Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Methacrylate-POSS in Nanosilica Dispersion Addition on Selected Mechanical Properties of Photo-Cured Dental Resins and Nanocomposites
Previous Article in Journal
Electrospinning Technology to Influence Hep-G2 Cell Growth on PVDF Fiber Mats as Medical Scaffolds: A New Perspective of Advanced Biomaterial
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Polyphosphoric Acid on Physical, Rheological, and Chemical Properties of Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene (SBS)-Modified Asphalt Binder
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mining Waste in Asphalt Pavements: A Critical Review of Waste Rock and Tailings Applications

Mineral Recovery Research Centre (MRRC), School of Engineering, Edith Cowan University (ECU), Joondalup, Perth, WA 6027, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9(8), 402; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9080402 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 22 June 2025 / Revised: 19 July 2025 / Accepted: 25 July 2025 / Published: 1 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Asphalt Composite Materials)

Abstract

This paper presents a critical and comprehensive review of the application of mining waste, specifically waste rock and tailings, in asphalt pavements, with the aim of synthesizing performance outcomes and identifying key research gaps. A systematic literature search yielded a final dataset of 41 peer-reviewed articles for detailed analysis. Bibliometric analysis indicates a notable upward trend in annual publications, reflecting growing academic and practical interest in this field. Performance-based evaluations demonstrate that mining wastes, particularly iron and copper tailings, have the potential to enhance the high-temperature performance (i.e., rutting resistance) of asphalt binders and mixtures when utilized as fillers or aggregates. However, their effects on fatigue life, low-temperature cracking, and moisture susceptibility are inconsistent, largely influenced by the physicochemical properties and dosage of the specific waste material. Despite promising results, critical knowledge gaps remain, particularly in relation to long-term durability, comprehensive environmental and economic Life-Cycle Assessments (LCA), and the inherent variability of waste materials. This review underscores the substantial potential of mining wastes as sustainable alternatives to conventional pavement materials, while emphasizing the need for further multidisciplinary research to support their broader implementation.

1. Introduction

The mining industry is the backbone of the modern world, supplying essential minerals and metals, but generates vast quantities of waste in the form of overburden, tailings, and slag. This mining waste presents a significant global challenge, as it often contains heavy metals and other toxic substances that are dangerous to the environment. The proper and sustainable disposal of this waste is one of the major problems facing the mining industry, as this waste poses severe environmental risks such as soil and water contamination due to the leaching of heavy metals. It is typically disposed of in tailing dams, which pose structural risks and can lead to disastrous environmental and human health impacts, as seen in the 2109 Brumandinho dam disaster in Brazil [1]. The scale of this issue is immense, with mining activities estimated to produce over 100 billion tonnes of waste annually worldwide [2]. In Australia, mining is a major industry and a significant contributor to national waste production. In the 2020–2021 financial year, the Australian mining sector generated 620 million tonnes of waste, a substantial increase from the 502 million tonnes generated in 2018–2019. For this review, the focus is on two major categories of mining waste: waste rock and tailings. Waste rock is the overburden or surrounding rock that must be removed to access the mineral ore. It is generally coarse and heterogeneous, with a particle size ranging from large boulders to fine sand, and is typically stored in large piles near mining sites [3]. A major environmental concern related to waste rock is the presence of sulphide minerals, which can potentially generate acid mine drainage through weathering [4]. Tailings are the residual material produced after valuable minerals have been extracted from the ore through enrichment processes, resulting in a fine-grained slurry with high water content, and can be classified as gravity, flotation, or leach tailings based on the extraction technique [3,4]. Approximately 96% of the processed fine waste ends up in tailings dams, which pose significant risks including water contamination and potential dam failures [5]. The sheer volume of this material, with United States mining operations producing approximately 1 billion tonnes of waste rock annually [3] and an estimated 13 billion tonnes of tailings generated globally each year [6], underscores the urgent need for sustainable management solutions.
The economic burden of this waste is twofold. First, the capital and operational costs of constructing and maintaining disposal facilities like tailings dams are substantial, with a single facility costing millions of dollars and requiring management in perpetuity [7,8]. Second, the risk of catastrophic dam failures can result in uninsurable cleanup liabilities that exceed billions of dollars [9]. In parallel, the road engineering sector faces its own escalating crisis. Natural aggregates (crushed stone, sand, and gravel) are a finite, non-renewable resource, and their continuous extraction is leading to rapid depletion of natural reserves, particularly near urban centres where demand is highest [10]. Furthermore, the environmental cost of quarrying is significant, involving permanent land use conversion, habitat destruction, and ecosystem disruption, making the permitting of new quarries increasingly difficult [11,12].
This convergence of two global challenges, first the huge and hazardous build-up of mining waste [13] and second the escalating demand for construction materials driven by infrastructure development [14,15], creates a unique opportunity for a circular economy solution. The critical need to search for sustainable management strategies for waste rock and tailings aligns perfectly with the asphalt industry’s search for alternative, sustainable, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly materials. Use of mining waste in asphalt pavements is therefore not merely a waste disposal method but also a strategic approach to resource conservation, potentially mitigating the environmental impact of both industries simultaneously.
At the same time, global asphalt production is increasing substantially, mainly due to extensive infrastructure development initiatives and rapid urbanization happening worldwide [16]. As urban development continues to expand, the requirement for sustainable, durable, and cost-effective pavement materials intensifies, establishing asphalt as the prime choice due to its inherent flexibility, durability, and economic benefits [17]. The latest market analysis reflects this trend, with the recent demand for asphalt indicating a consistent upward trajectory. For example, the global asphalt market was valued at USD 168.084 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 247.33 billion by 2033, demonstrating a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.4% [16]. These findings are further supported by other market reports, showing similar growth rates with CAGRs ranging from approximately 4.9% to 5.1% [16,17,18,19]. The continued growth across different market analyses highlights a strong and continuing demand for asphalt, thereby highlighting the critical need to identify and develop alternative sustainable sources of materials for its production. The increasing world population and the continued expansion of urban areas directly contribute to demand for improved and expanded road networks. This demand necessitates a large volume of asphalt materials, making the exploration of sustainable alternatives such as waste rock and tailings an increasingly important objective. Flexible pavement relies heavily on natural aggregates, which normally constitute around 90–95% of the total mixture weight [20]. These natural aggregates are finite and non-renewable; additionally, the continuously growing demand for road infrastructure poses a significant threat to their long-term availability. The quantity of aggregates required is substantial; for a single kilometre of bituminous mixture wearing course, the demand can exceed 15,000 tonnes [21]. The depletion of readily available natural aggregates has several consequences, including higher costs and environmental impacts associated with their extraction and processing from quarries. Similarly, asphalt binder, which is a critical component in flexible pavement that binds the aggregates together, is primarily obtained from petroleum, another finite and non-renewable source [20,21]. Petroleum reserves are depleting day by day, raising economic and environmental challenges for the long-term sustainability of traditional asphalt production. Furthermore, asphalt binder is inherently susceptible to ageing due to oxidation, exposure to ultraviolet radiation, and temperature fluctuations [22]. The finite, non-renewable nature and depletion of aggregates and bitumen, combined with the environmental and performance limitations of bitumen, compel researchers to investigate and implement alternative and sustainable materials in flexible pavement.
Over the past fifteen years, research on mining waste incorporation in flexible pavements has progressed from basic feasibility studies (2010–2016) [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30] through performance-based evaluations of rutting, fatigue, and moisture distress (2017–2020) [31,32,33,34,35,36,37], to today’s holistic sustainability assessments about self-healing capacity, environmental risk analyses, and economic evaluations (2021–2025) [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55]. While iron and copper tailings reliably enhance high-temperature rutting resistance, their impacts on fatigue life and moisture susceptibility remain inconsistent and material-specific. Three core challenges persist: the lack of long-term durability data, insufficient comparative Life-Cycle Assessments (LCAs) and Life-Cycle Cost Analyses (LCCAs), and the inherent variability of waste materials, which deters standardization. Therefore, this paper aims to provide a critical review of the existing body of literature regarding the utilization of waste rock and tailings in asphalt pavement. By systematically synthesizing performance outcomes, mapping the research trajectory, and critically evaluating the evidence against the key challenges, this review clarifies the state of the art and identifies the core conflicts and persistent knowledge gaps. The innovative goal is to furnish a clear, evidence-based roadmap for future research, highlighting the specific, multidisciplinary investigations required to bridge the gap from laboratory potential to standard engineering practice. Specifically, this review seeks to address the following key research question: “What are the impacts of incorporating waste rock and tailings as partial or full replacements in flexible pavement on its rheological, mechanical, durability, environmental, and economic performance?”.

2. Methodology and Bibliometric Analysis

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify the relevant research papers relating to utilization of mining waste rock and tailings in flexible pavement. The research methodology, as illustrated in Figure 1, aims to ensure a transparent and reproducible search and selection protocol. They primary databases used are Scopus and Web of Science. Additionally, Google Scholar was also searched to confirm broader analysis of the available literature. The search method used specific keywords related to both mining waste and asphalt to ensure a comprehensive retrieval of existing studies. The primary keywords used include “mining waste”, “bitumen”, “asphalt binder”, and “asphalt mixture”. However, to ensure a comprehensive search, synonyms and related terms such as “mine tailings”, “copper tailings”, “iron tailings”, and “mine waste” were also identified and considered. Based on the established best practices for effective searches, the Boolean functions “AND” and “OR” were used to capture a wide range of relevant literature. A two-stage screening process (title/abstract and full-text) was performed to select articles for the final review. This screening was guided by strict criteria: to be included, studies had to investigate the application of mining waste (tailings or waste rock) as a component in bituminous binders or asphalt mixtures; include empirical data from laboratory or field tests evaluating the material’s rheological, mechanical, durability, or environmental performance; be available in English; and have a publication date between 1 January 2010 and 28 April 2025. Conversely, articles were excluded if they focused on non-asphalt applications (e.g., concrete, unbound base layers, soil stabilization), were review or conceptual papers lacking original experimental data, or exclusively characterized mining waste without assessing its performance in asphalt. Following the application of these criteria, a final dataset of 41 articles was selected for detailed analysis.
A descriptive and bibliometric analysis was subsequently conducted using the Bibliometrix R-package (version 4.3.3) [56]. This analysis provides insights into publication trends, the geographical distribution of research, and the key journals and collaborative networks driving the field. The annual publication output reveals a growing academic interest in the utilization of mining waste in asphalt pavements, particularly over the last decade. As shown in Figure 2, the number of publications has followed a distinct upward trend. This increased research focus can be attributed to the growing emphasis on the circular economy and the pursuit of sustainable development goals within the construction industry. The analysis indicates that research activity has entered an exponential growth phase in recent years, peaking in 2024 with 9 publications, followed by a strong showing in 2022 with 7 publications. This recent surge underscores the topic’s increasing relevance and the ongoing efforts by the scientific community to find viable, evidence-based solutions for mining waste.
To understand the global research landscape, an analysis of the geographical distribution of publications was performed based on the affiliations of the contributing authors. Figure 3 provides a world map illustrating the countries with the highest research output in this domain. The analysis of author affiliations reveals that a few countries lead the research effort. China is the most significant contributor, with its institutions affiliated with 40 publications in the dataset. This is followed by substantial contributions from Brazil (11), Malaysia (8), India (7), and Australia (6). Note that the sum of frequencies exceeds the total number of articles (41) because single publications can have co-authors from multiple countries. The dominant role of these nations likely reflects their large-scale mining industries, which generate significant quantities of waste and create a strong impetus for research into value-added recycling solutions. The wide geographical spread highlights the global nature of the challenge posed by mining waste and the universal interest in developing sustainable construction materials.
The intellectual structure of a research field can be mapped by analysing its primary publication venues and the collaborative networks between institutions. Figure 4 identifies the most impactful journals based on publication volume. The Construction and Building Materials journal is the premier venue for this research, having published 8 articles during the examined period of time. It focuses mostly on the properties and applications of construction materials, which makes it an ideal outlet. The second most prominent is the Journal of Cleaner Production (4 articles), which signals the strong sustainability driver underpinning this research area. Other key outlets like the Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering (3 articles) and the International Journal of Pavement Engineering (2 articles) confirm that this topic is of high interest to the core civil and pavement engineering communities.
To provide a highly detailed view of the field’s structure, a three-field Sankey diagram was generated (Figure 5). This diagram visualizes the flow of knowledge between three key bibliometric dimensions: research institutions (left field: AU_UN), their respective countries (middle field: AU_CO), and the publication sources (right field: SO). The height of each dimension is proportional to the frequency of occurrence, while the width of the connecting flows illustrates the strength of the relationship. The diagram reveals a leading research ecosystem centred in China (frequency = 47), where a powerful knowledge flow originates from a cluster of highly productive institutions like Changan University (frequency = 47) and Shijiazhuang Tiedao University (frequency = 13). This flow is then predominantly channelled through the “China” node and converges on the journal Construction and Building Materials, indicating a highly active and centralized national research program. Furthermore, the diagram highlights secondary research hubs, with significant, though smaller, flows from institutions in Brazil (frequency = 19), Malaysia (frequency = 8), India (frequency = 12), and Australia (frequency = 6), which are channelled into other top-tier journals. By mapping institutional output to specific publication venues, the diagram effectively outlines the intellectual structure and key distribution channels within the field, providing a clear picture of the global research environment.
Beyond publication volume, the thematic focus of the literature has also evolved. Early research (around 2010–2016) primarily concentrated on establishing the fundamental viability of using common mining wastes like copper tailings and boron waste as a bulk aggregate replacement. These studies focused on standard properties and volumetric design to confirm that such materials could meet minimum construction specifications [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Subsequent studies (2017–2020) shifted towards a more nuanced performance-based evaluation, investigating specific distress mechanisms such as rutting, fatigue cracking, and moisture sensitivity in greater detail [31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. More recently (2021–2025), the research frontier has advanced toward holistic sustainability assessments. This modern phase is characterized by investigations into functional properties like self-healing and conductivity, detailed environmental risk assessments through leaching tests, and economic analyses using cost–benefit [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55]. This progression reflects a maturing field moving from proof-of-concept to practical implementation and optimization.

3. Utilization of Mining Waste in Flexible Pavement

Incorporating mining waste into the road construction industry offers a highly promising and sustainable approach to addressing environmental challenges while simultaneously enhancing pavement performance. The utilization of mining by-products not only helps reduce the environmental impact associated with the disposal of such waste but also promotes resource efficiency by repurposing materials that would otherwise contribute to land degradation and pollution. Numerous previous studies have demonstrated that integrating various types of mining waste into flexible pavement mixtures can significantly improve key engineering properties. For example, research has reported notable improvements in rutting resistance, which enhances the pavement’s ability to withstand permanent deformation under heavy traffic loads [49,54,57]. Additionally, the inclusion of mining waste has been shown to increase cracking resistance, thereby extending the lifespan of the pavement by minimizing surface distress and fatigue cracking [50]. Fatigue resistance itself, a critical factor for pavement durability under repeated loading, is also enhanced through this practice [52]. Furthermore, mining waste incorporation improves moisture susceptibility, reducing the potential for water-induced damage, which can weaken pavement structures [58]. Studies also highlight increases in stiffness, which contributes to load distribution efficiency and structural integrity, ensuring long-term serviceability and reduced maintenance needs [43,48,59]. Collectively, these findings suggest that mining waste can play a vital role in developing more sustainable, resilient, and cost-effective road infrastructures. Several types of mining waste have been used in previous studies to improve the properties of flexible pavement, including iron tailings [40,41,42,43,44,47,50,52,53,54,60], copper tailings [35,36,37,38,39,49,55], phosphate mine waste rock [61], tungsten mine tailings [51], aluminium tailing slurry (ATS) [62], quartzite waste [59], nickel and cobalt tailings [48], iron ore overburden (IOO) [46], manganese ore tailings [45], and taconite [63].

3.1. Common Mining Wastes: A Summary of Their Characteristics and Roles in Asphalt

Different types of mining waste have been evaluated for use in flexible pavements, each with distinctive characteristics affecting their application. By-products of mineral extraction and processing vary significantly in their physical and chemical properties. Understanding these properties is critical to evaluating their suitability in asphalt pavement, as a coarse or fine aggregate, mineral fillers, or binder modifiers. Table 1 summarizes the main characteristics and typical uses of key mining waste types.
Iron tailings (IT), a common by-product of iron ore processing, are extensively studied, and typically consist of fine-grained materials rich in silica (SiO2) and iron oxide (Fe2O3). Their particle size often makes them suitable as a mineral filler in asphalt mastic or a partial replacement for fine or coarse aggregate in asphalt mixtures. The angularity of IT particles can enhance inter-particle friction and mixture stability, while their iron oxide content can improve microwave heating efficiency for self-healing applications. However, their often-acidic character, due to high SiO2 content, can sometimes cause adhesion concerns with asphalt binder if not appropriately addressed. For instance, Cui et al. [52] noted that IT, mainly quartz, exhibited rich angularity leading to higher interaction with asphalt, despite having lower adhesion energy than limestone. Wei et al. [43] reported that iron ore tailings (IOT) have smaller particles and a larger specific surface area than limestone filler (LF), enhancing asphalt mastic stiffness. However, IOT’s higher hydrophilic coefficient and more acidic nature might result in poorer adhesion with asphalt compared to LF. Cao et al. [60] highlighted weak adhesion due to the acidic chemical compositions of iron tailings. The presence of iron oxides is particularly beneficial for relevance involving microwave or induction heating, such as pavement de-icing or encouraging self-healing properties in asphalt [50,53].
Copper tailings (CT) are another frequently explored fine-grained waste, mainly composed of silica, with varying amounts of other metal oxides (e.g., Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO) depending on the ore source. CTs has primarily been evaluated as a mineral filler in asphalt concrete and mastic [37,49,55]. Its fineness and particle characteristics, such as a rough surface and often higher specific surface area compared to conventional limestone powder, can influence asphalt adsorption and mastic stiffening [49]. This typically results in improved high-temperature performance of the asphalt mixture. Some studies note that the high silica content in CT might negatively affect moisture resistance, a common concern with siliceous materials in asphalt [37,55]. Other mining-related wastes include iron ore overburden, nickel and cobalt tailings, manganese ore tailings, quartzite waste, aluminium tailing slurry, coal gangue powder (CGP), tungsten mine tailings, and taconite. These materials vary widely in their chemical and physical properties, influencing their suitability and role in asphalt mixture.
The data presented in Table 1 clearly demonstrate the considerable variability in the properties of different secondary materials derived from mining waste. This variability underscores the critical need for thorough and specific characterization of each individual batch or source prior to its incorporation into asphalt mixtures. Since mining waste materials can differ widely depending on their origin, mineral composition, and processing methods, assuming uniform behaviour across different sources can lead to inconsistent pavement performance and durability [45,46,47,49,50,51,52,53,54,55].
A key factor influencing the performance of these materials in asphalt mixtures is their chemical composition, particularly the content of acidic or alkaline oxides. These chemical constituents play a significant role in determining the nature of the interaction between the binder and the waste material. For instance, the presence of certain oxides can affect the adhesion properties of the binder, as well as the overall moisture susceptibility of the pavement. Moisture damage is a common cause of premature pavement failure, so understanding and controlling the chemical characteristics of mining waste is vital to enhancing durability.
In addition to chemical factors, the physical properties of mining waste, such as particle size distribution, particle shape, surface texture, and specific gravity, have a direct and profound impact on both the volumetric design and mechanical behaviour of the asphalt mixture. For example, particle size distribution influences the compatibility and density of the mix, while particle shape and texture affect the internal friction and bonding within the pavement structure. Specific gravity, in turn, affects the calculation of volumetric proportions and ultimately the stability and load-bearing capacity of the finished pavement.
The intended role of the mining waste within the asphalt mixture, whether as a filler, fine aggregate, or coarse aggregate, is typically dictated by these intrinsic physical and chemical characteristics. Proper classification ensures that the waste material is utilized in a manner that maximizes its benefits and minimizes potential drawbacks. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation that includes both chemical and physical testing is essential for optimizing the use of mining waste in road construction, thereby improving performance, sustainability, and cost-effectiveness.

3.2. Mining Waste Utilisation Methods and Performance Benefits

Mining wastes have been effectively incorporated into flexible pavements either as full or partial aggregate replacements or as mineral fillers, with optimal dosages determined by specific performance requirements. Quartzite waste employed at 100% replacement yields mixtures of increased stiffness [59], while phosphate mine waste, although technically viable at 100%, exhibits weak binder–aggregate adhesion and brittleness that limit its optimal content to ≤40% [61]. Iron ore overburden can fully substitute conventional aggregate without compromising mechanical properties or environmental safety [46], whereas iron ore waste at 17 and 20% replacement satisfies medium-traffic criteria [64]. Iron tailings, when used as aggregate up to 100%, require modifiers such as hydrated lime or silane coupling agents to mitigate low-temperature cracking and moisture sensitivity [60]. As fillers in asphalt mastic, iron tailings replacing 20–100% of traditional filler enhance microwave heating and self-healing but may weaken high-temperature rheology and fatigue resistance unless coupling agents are added [43,50,52,54]. Copper tailings powder, applied at binder–powder ratios of 0.3–1.2 or replacing up to 100% of limestone filler, improves rutting resistance, though high substitution levels can degrade low-temperature cracking and moisture performance [49,55].
Table 2 provides a comprehensive summary of previous studies investigating the performance of flexible pavements incorporating various types of mining waste. The table details critical aspects of each study, including the methods of waste utilization, percentage of material replacement, type of asphalt binder used, key performance outcomes, and the identified optimum content levels. This compilation offers valuable insights into how different mining waste materials influence pavement behaviour under diverse conditions. A recurring finding across these studies is the enhancement of high-temperature performance properties, particularly rutting resistance and stiffness, when mining waste is incorporated into the asphalt mix. This improvement is largely attributed to the rigid and angular nature of many mining by-products, which can increase the structural integrity of the pavement and reduce permanent deformation under heavy traffic loads. In many cases, the inclusion of mining waste acts to reinforce the mix matrix, thereby improving its load-bearing capacity and resistance to shear forces at elevated temperatures.
However, the influence of mining waste on other critical pavement properties, such as low-temperature cracking resistance, fatigue performance, and moisture susceptibility, appears to be more variable. These performance aspects are highly sensitive to several interrelated factors, including the mineralogical and chemical composition of the waste, particle size and shape, the dosage used, and the presence or absence of additional modifiers (e.g., polymers, anti-stripping agents, rejuvenators). For instance, some wastes may contribute positively to fatigue resistance by enhancing binder–aggregate bonding, while others may cause embrittlement or reduce flexibility, leading to premature cracking under repeated loading or thermal stress. Moisture susceptibility is another area where results diverge. Certain mining wastes, particularly those with high levels of hydrophilic compounds or poor adhesion characteristics, can increase the likelihood of moisture-induced damage such as stripping. Conversely, when appropriately treated or combined with adhesion promoters, these materials can actually improve moisture resistance.
Therefore, while the overall trend points toward the potential benefits of using mining waste in flexible pavement construction, especially in terms of high-temperature performance, caution must be taken in evaluating and optimizing mix designs for other performance criteria. A case-by-case approach, supported by laboratory testing and performance modelling, is essential to ensure that the selected mining waste type and dosage deliver the desired outcomes without introducing new risks. Additionally, the use of performance-enhancing additives may be necessary in some cases to mitigate adverse effects and fully realize the benefits of mining waste incorporation.
Several knowledge gaps persist in the literature. While many studies focus on the initial mechanical properties, there is often limited investigation into the long-term performance and durability of pavements incorporating these wastes, including aspects like the aging effects of the modified binders and mixtures. Calandra et al. [45] noted an anti-aging effect with manganese ore tailings, but this is not universally studied for all waste types. Environmental impact assessments to ensure long-term environmental safety, particularly comprehensive leaching studies beyond initial TCLP tests, are not consistently reported for all waste types. A limited number of studies provided some leaching data; more extensive research is crucial for confirming long-term environmental safety. Investigations by Guo et al. [55], Shamsi and Zakerinejad [46], Qin et al. [62], Wei et al. [43], and Lei et al. [49], among others, indicate that asphalt effectively immobilizes heavy metals from incorporated wastes, with leachate concentrations remaining far below regulatory limits. However, these findings rely on short-term laboratory tests. A strong argument for further research is that these methods fail to account for the cumulative effects of real-world, long-term exposure to weathering, freeze–thaw cycles, and varying pH over a pavement’s full-service life. Therefore, comprehensive studies simulating these conditions are necessary to definitively assess the long-term leaching risk. Furthermore, while some studies like Guo et al. [55], Li et al. [50], Qin et al. [62], Shamsi and Zakerinejad [46], and Wei et al. [51] provide cost–benefit analyses, more widespread economic feasibility studies considering transportation, processing, and long-term maintenance costs are needed to promote practical adoption. Inconsistencies in optimal dosages and performance outcomes across different studies for similar waste types (e.g., iron tailings) suggest that the specific physical and chemical properties of the waste, which can vary significantly by source, play a critical role and require detailed characterization in each case.

4. Impact of Mining Waste on Asphalt Performance

4.1. Rutting Resistance

Rutting resistance is defined as the ability of a pavement to resist permanent deformation due to repeated loading at high temperature. Rutting is commonly quantified via Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) rutting factor (|G*|/sin δ), Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) parameters (non-recoverable creep compliance Jnr and percent recovery R), dynamic stability (wheel-tracking tests), or cumulative permanent deformation (PDA) under cyclic loads. Across a variety of mining wastes, the combination of angular particle morphology, high specific surface area, and surface roughness generally yields improved rutting performance by stiffening the binder and enhancing aggregate interlock [54,55,59,62]. Various studies have particularly investigated the high-temperature rutting resistance of asphalt mastic by using mining wastes. Wang et al. [57] examined coal gangue powder (CGP) as a filler in asphalt mastic at different asphalt to filler ratios using MSCR tests at 64 °C; they reported that CGP-modified mastic demonstrated lower non-recoverable creep compliance Jnr than limestone mastics, reaching a PG 70E grade after RTFOT aging. S. Li et al. [54] investigated asphalt mastic in which limestone filler was replaced in quantities of 20% to 100% by iron tailings (IT); raw IT increased Jnr and reduced recovery, highlighting weaker rutting resistance, but the addition of 1.5% silane coupling agent fully restored Jnr and recovery to levels matching limestone mastics, indicating complete mitigation of the negative effects of IT. Lei et al. [49] evaluated copper-tailings-filled asphalt mastics at ratios from 0.3 to 0.4. They found that replacing limestone filler with copper tailings boosted the complex modulus |G*| by 35–65%* at identical filler-to-asphalt ratios, and raised |G*|/sin δ, though the relative improvement gradually declined as filler content increased, demonstrating markedly enhanced resistance to permanent deformation due to copper tailings’ finer particles, larger surface area, and rougher texture strengthening the filler–binder network. Finally, Qin et al. [62] explored aluminium tailing slurry (ATS) as a binder modifier, finding that DSR temperature sweeps (40–76 °C) revealed progressive increases in rutting factor (G*/sin δ) with higher ATS dosages, and MSCR tests at 54 °C showed that a 9% ATS dosage reduced Jnr by 26% and 27.3% while boosting recovery by about 43.3% and 34.5% at 0.1 and 3.2 kPa, respectively, confirming significant enhancement in rutting resistance.
In asphalt mixtures, recycled mining wastes likewise yield notable improvements in rutting performance, as shown in Table 3. Guo et al. [55] developed self-sensing asphalt concretes by substituting limestone filler with up to 50% copper tailings (CT) and adding 0.3% conductive carbon fibre (CF); wheel-tracking tests at 60 °C demonstrated dynamic stability exceeding 4500 passes/mm, surpassing control mixtures and meeting high-temperature criteria while maintaining moisture susceptibility and low-temperature performance. Mendonça et al. [59] assessed dense-graded mixtures using isotropic (IAM) and foliated (FAM) quartzite wastes as aggregates; MeDiNa simulations predicted rut depths below 6 mm under 1 × 106 and 5 × 106 ESALs, which is well under the 20 mm maximum permissible deformation, demonstrating satisfactory rutting resistance. Xue et al. [53] explored microwave maintenance technology with iron tailings as aggregate, where high-temperature dynamic stability tests on specimens prepared with 4.75–13.2 mm iron tailings showed raised high-temperature dynamic stability by 16.6% compared to basalt mixture, and that microwave maintenance uniformly heated the surface above 126 °C within 2 min.
Table 3 presents a detailed overview of the rutting performance observed in flexible pavements modified with various types of mining waste. Rutting, a form of permanent deformation typically occurring under high temperatures and repeated loading, is a major distress mechanism that affects pavement service life and user safety. The studies summarized in the Table 3 evaluate how the inclusion of mining waste used as filler, fine aggregate, or coarse aggregate impacts the resistance of asphalt mixtures to rutting. A consistent finding across the reviewed studies is the enhancement of rutting resistance when mining waste is incorporated into the asphalt mix, particularly at optimal replacement levels. This improvement is often attributed to the angular shape, rough texture, and high hardness of many mining by-products, which increase internal friction and interlocking within the mix matrix. In addition, some mining wastes contribute to the stiffening of the asphalt binder or matrix, further reducing the susceptibility of the mix to deformation under heavy traffic loads.
For instance, the use of copper slag and iron tailings, both rich in hard minerals and with angular particle shapes, has demonstrated significant improvements in dynamic stability and wheel-tracking test results. Similarly, iron ore tailings, when finely ground and properly blended, have been shown to act as performance-enhancing fillers that improve the rigidity and rutting resistance of asphalt mixtures. In several cases, the studies identified an optimum replacement percentage (typically ranging from 10% to 30% by weight of aggregate or filler) beyond which performance gains plateaued or began to decline due to issues such as brittleness or poor workability. Overall, the evidence presented in Table 3 highlights the potential of mining waste to enhance the high-temperature performance of asphalt pavements. However, achieving optimal rutting resistance requires careful consideration of material characteristics, mix design parameters, and field performance testing to ensure the structural and functional integrity of the pavement over time.
In summary, the use of mining waste as a filler or aggregate almost universally enhances the high-temperature performance and rutting resistance of asphalt pavements. This advantage is one of the most consistently reported observations in the literature. The primary limitation of current research is the general absence of long-term field data to substantiate these laboratory findings under real-world traffic and environmental conditions. Future work should therefore concentrate on constructing and monitoring trial pavement sections to confirm that enhanced laboratory performance translates to improved in-service durability.

4.2. Fatigue Resistance

Fatigue cracking is a principal distress type in asphalt pavements under repetitive traffic loading. Fatigue resistance is typically investigated at the binder level using time sweep and Linear Amplitude Sweep (LAS), and at the mixture level using indirect-tensile (IDT) fatigue tests or mechanistic empirical simulations (e.g., MeDiNa). Mining wastes such as iron tailings (IT), copper tailings, and other mining waste have been evaluated for their effect on both mastic and mixture fatigue life, with results highlighting that when properly dosed and treated, these by-products can meet or even surpass fatigue performance requirements [45,47,52,54].
At the mastic level, Cui et al. [52] examined the use of iron tailings (IT) as partial replacements for limestone filler in asphalt mastic. Using Dynamic Shear Rheometer-based Linear Amplitude Sweep (LAS) tests at 20 °C under strains of 2.5%, 5%, and 7.5%, they found that the finest IT delivered an Nf@5% of ≈ 1.09 × 107 cycles, closely approaching the 1.34 × 107 cycles achieved by limestone mastics. Gray correlation analysis revealed that both interfacial adhesion energy and interaction ability of asphalt with mineral filler (each correlating ≈ 0.58 with fatigue life) jointly govern mastic durability, suggesting that tailoring IT surface chemistry and morphology is essential for optimizing fatigue resistance. Building on this, S. Li et al. [54] investigated mastics with 20–100% iron tailings filler replacing limestone, both unmodified and treated with 1.5% silane coupling agent (SCA). In unmodified mastics, fatigue life Nf dropped by about 7.1% at 2.5% strain and 15.5% at 5.0% strain compared to limestone controls, whereas SCA treatment not only restored Nf to near control levels but for the 80% IT mastic even improved it by enhancing the binder filler adhesion. Wang et al. [57] compared coal gangue powder (CGP), limestone, and cement fillers in emulsified mastics, and CGP mastics showed lower fatigue resistance than limestone controls; unaged CGP mastics at powder-to-binder (P/B) ratios of 0.9, 1.2, and 1.5 showed fatigue-life drops of 50.8%, 21.1%, and 8.2% at 2.5% strain, respectively, and after RTFOT aging at 5% strain, fatigue life fell by 47.7% (P/B = 0.6) and 40.4% (P/B = 1.5). Calandra et al. [45] found that incorporating up to 10% w/w Mn tailings into bitumen increased the fatigue parameter (G*·sin δ) as compared to the control binder, which indicates lower fatigue resistance.
Table 4 shows the fatigue properties reported in several studies. At the mixture level, de Moraes et al. [47] replaced fine aggregate with different percentages (7.5%, 10%, and 12.5%) of iron ore tailings in hot-mix asphalt, and found that all IT-modified mixtures produced strong Wöhler (S–N) curves with R2 > 0.80. At low-stress amplitudes, the 7.5% and 10% IOT mixes outperformed the control in cycles to failure, while at higher stresses the control and 12.5% IT mixes were superior. Overall, the 12.5% IOT blend exhibited the longest fatigue life across all stress levels, reflecting its greater stiffness and resistance to cyclic damage. Mendonça et al. [59] evaluated mixtures fully substituting aggregate with isotropic or foliated quartzite waste. The foliated quartzite mixture (FAM) consistently endured more load cycles to failure than the isotropic quartzite mixture (IAM), with both achieving R2 > 0.8. Furthermore, Brazilian mechanistic empirical pavement simulations using MeDiNa predicted that both mixtures would keep the fatigue crack area below 30% and rutting under 20 mm for up to 5 × 106 equivalent axle loads, indicating they meet design criteria for medium–heavy traffic. Guimarães et al. [64] examined the utilization of iron ore waste as a fine aggregate replacement at 17% and 20% replacement; the result shows that 20% iron ore processing waste (Mixture 2) slightly reduced fatigue life, its S–N slope was steeper, and it dropped to Fatigue Class 0, while the mixture with 17% waste plus 8% sand (Mixture 3) not only matched the control’s Fatigue Class 1 but exhibited marginally higher fatigue life constant values. In other words, up to 17% mining waste can be used without harm and may even modestly improve fatigue resistance, whereas a full 20% replacement leads to a modest decline.
Collectively, all these studies, as shown in Table 4, covering binder-level to mixture level demonstrate that mining wastes, if properly processed, dosed, and surface-treated, can maintain or even enhance fatigue resistance in asphalt mastics and mixtures. Critical parameters include filler/aggregate content, particle size and morphology, interfacial adhesion (boosted by coupling agents), and optimal powder-to-binder ratios. By carefully engineering these variables, sustainable incorporation of mining by-products into asphalt pavements can be achieved without compromising fatigue life.
In summary, the impact of mining waste on fatigue performance is not as direct as its influence on rutting. The outcomes greatly rely on the characteristics of the material, its dosage, and whether chemical additives such as coupling agents are employed. Although certain wastes can improve fatigue life through boosting mixture stiffness and adhesion, others might cause brittleness and reduced durability. The principal drawback lies in the inconsistency of results, which makes it difficult to establish general guidelines. Future research should aim to develop a framework that links the specific chemo-physical properties of a waste material (e.g., mineralogy, surface energy, particle shape) directly to its expected impact on fatigue performance, enabling more predictable mix design.

4.3. Moisture Susceptibility

Moisture susceptibility is one of the fundamental distress mechanisms in asphalt pavements, caused by weakening of the adhesive bond between binder and aggregate under water exposure. It is typically investigated by Marshall stability ratio (MSR) from water immersion Marshall tests, the freeze–thaw splitting tensile strength ratio (TSR), or indirect tensile strength ratio after conditioning. A minimum MSR or TSR of 80% (or 70–75% for some specifications) is typically required for satisfactory moisture resistance [41,55,60].
Table 5 shows the moisture susceptibility of mining waste in previous studies. Lei et al. [49] investigated bond strength (after waste immersion) of copper tailings in asphalt mastic. The traditional limestone filler was replaced with copper tailings at filler-to-asphalt ratios of 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, and 1.2. They observed that copper tailings mastics displayed a decline in bond-strength under water compared to limestone mastics but still exhibited limited reduction in moisture stability. Copper tailings in asphalt mastic show acceptable moisture durability, particularly at lower filler content (F/A ≈ 0.6), because higher tailings contents increase the moisture damage. Guo et al. [55] found that replacing limestone filler with 50% copper tailings (CT) in asphalt mixture produced MSR values exceeding 80% and freeze–thaw TSR above 85%, meeting specification requirements. However, CT substitution dosage of 75% and 100% fell below this standard threshold, demonstrating lower moisture resistance at high CT contents. Xue et al. [53] evaluated SMA-13 mixtures, replacing basalt aggregate with iron tailings of various particle sizes; water-immersion MSR ranged from 88.54% to 92.83% (basalt control = 94.78%), and freeze–thaw TSR from 80.65% to 84.55% (control = 87.69%), all of which were above typical 80% thresholds. All iron tailings showed satisfactory performance and met the standard requirement for moisture resistance, and could be used as aggregate replacement in asphalt pavement, despite having modestly reduced performance compared to basalt (control). Mendonça et al. [59] evaluated asphalt mixtures using isotropic (IAM) and foliated (FAM) quartzite waste aggregates; both IAM and FAM exceeded minimum tensile strength requirements after freeze–thaw conditioning, demonstrating that quartzite waste does not affect moisture susceptibility. Ullah et al. [41] similarly highlight the properties of conductive asphalt concretes incorporating iron tailings as 25% replacement for natural aggregate. All tailings mixtures with carbon fibre (CF) up to 0.6% easily surpass the 75% TSR requirement, indicating satisfactory moisture susceptibility, while at 0.8% CF, moisture resistance collapses, with a TSR value of 26%, far below specification.
In summary, the influence of mining waste on moisture susceptibility is highly variable and seems to be one of the most critical hurdles for widespread adoption. Although many wastes can satisfy standard TSR or MSR specifications, the inherent mineralogy, particularly high silica content, often exposes mixtures to moisture damage [37,55]. The literature consistently shows that performance is dependent on waste-specific chemistry. A significant shortcoming is the reliance on standard short-term conditioning tests (TSR, MSR), which may not fully capture long-term field performance under complex weathering and traffic conditions. Future research should concentrate on developing more robust testing methodologies that simulate in-service conditions and on creating cost-effective surface treatments for hydrophilic waste materials to ensure durable binder–aggregate adhesion.

5. Environmental Impacts of Mining Waste Use in Flexible Pavements

Beyond establishing mechanical performance, the environmental viability of utilizing mining waste is paramount to its acceptance as a sustainable material. This section builds upon the performance analysis in the preceding chapters. A particular mining waste may offer performance benefits, such as the improved rutting resistance seen with certain iron tailings (as discussed in Section 4.1), but its unique chemical composition could simultaneously pose an environmental risk, such as the leaching of heavy metals. Evaluating this trade-off is critical for a holistic assessment.
The growing interest in using mining waste as alternative materials in asphalt pavement comes from two critical points, addressing the increasing challenges of huge mining waste and reducing dependence on rapidly decreasing conventional construction resources. Although the engineering feasibility and performance benefits of utilizing waste materials such as iron tailings, copper tailings, aluminium slurry, iron ore overburden, and others in asphalt have been thoroughly evaluated, a detailed analysis of their environmental impact is of uppermost importance. Environmental assessment is critical to validate that these innovative methods produce genuinely sustainable solutions; lower the potential ecological damage, for instance the release of toxic substances or increased carbon footprint; and align with circular economy principles [46,49,55].

5.1. Leaching and Toxicity Potential

A substantial environmental concern correlated with the incorporation of mining wastes in the construction industry is the potential for leaching of heavy metals and other toxic substances into the surrounding soil and groundwater. Therefore, many of the evaluated studies placed strong importance on assessing this risk. The most common method used for this evaluation was the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP), as employed by Guo et al. [55] for copper tailings (CT) in self-sensing asphalt, Shamsi and Zakerinejad [46] for iron ore overburden (IOO) in HMA, Qin et al. [62] for aluminium tailing slurry (ATS)-modified asphalt, Oluwasola et al. [30] for EAF steel slag and copper mine tailings mixes, and Wei et al. [43] for iron ore tailing (IOT) filler in asphalt mastic. Lei et al. [49] also used TCLP for copper tailings powder (CTP) in asphalt mastic, and expanded it with acid digestion tests on the raw CTP to comprehend baseline hazardous content.
The pollutants of major concern among these studies were heavy metals such as chromium (Cr), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), barium (Ba), nickel (Ni), and cobalt (Co) [30,43,46,49,55,62]. The results from these leaching tests were constantly positive, demonstrating that the asphalt binder plays a critical role in capturing and immobilizing these potentially hazardous substances. For example, Guo et al. [55] found that heavy metal leaching from CT–asphalt concrete was “far below the strict regulatory limit value as class I groundwater.” Shamsi and Zakerinejad [46] stated that although raw IOO may have leachable pollutants, the HMA integrating IOO demonstrated substantially lower concentrations, well within safe limits, indicating that bitumen assists in solidification/stabilization. Similarly, Qin et al. [62] reported that ATS-modified asphalt had a “very low pollution risk”. Oluwasola et al. [30] also concluded that for a mixture with EAF steel slag and copper mine tailings, the concentrations of identified heavy metals in the TCLP test did not exceed standard limits. Wei et al. [43] and Lei et al. [49] reported similar findings for IOT and CTP in asphalt mastics, respectively, with metal concentrations being “far below the limitations in the specification”, proving a low contamination risk. Lei et al. [49] further noted that even under higher temperature (70 °C) leaching tests, most metal concentrations remained low, emphasizing effective immobilization by the asphalt. Table 6 summarizes the heavy metal leaching findings from the papers that conducted relevant tests. The concentrations are generally for the final asphalt product (mixture or mastic) where available, as this is most relevant to in-service environmental impact.
A comprehensive review of studies [25,30,39,42,43,48] that employed leaching tests indicates that mining wastes, when incorporated into asphalt mixtures or asphalt mastic, generally pose a low environmental risk in terms of leachability. This low leaching potential is primarily attributable to the effective encapsulation of the waste particles by the bitumen binder. Bitumen acts as a hydrophobic and impermeable matrix, which significantly restricts the mobility of potentially hazardous elements such as the heavy metals commonly found in certain types of mining waste. The physical and chemical interaction between the binder and the waste materials helps immobilize contaminants, preventing their release into the surrounding environment, particularly under typical in-service conditions. Multiple studies, as shown in Table 6, have demonstrated that even under simulated aggressive environmental scenarios, such as prolonged exposure to water or acidic solutions, the release of harmful substances remains well below regulatory limits. This suggests that asphalt mixtures can serve as an effective containment medium for certain classes of industrial and mining by-products. Moreover, the encapsulation mechanism not only supports environmental safety but also aligns with the principles of sustainable construction and circular economy by enabling the reuse of waste materials in infrastructure applications. However, it is important to note that the leaching behaviour can vary depending on the specific chemical composition of the mining waste, the particle size, and the degree of dispersion within the asphalt matrix. Therefore, site-specific and material-specific leaching assessments remain essential prior to large-scale application to ensure long-term environmental compliance.
In summary, the findings from leaching studies support the environmental suitability of using mining waste in asphalt pavements. When properly processed and incorporated, these materials offer a safe and effective means of recycling industrial by-products, contributing to both environmental protection and resource efficiency.

5.2. Greenhouse Gas Emissions

One of the critical factors in determining the environmental sustainability of mining waste in flexible pavement is investigation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. GHG emissions can be reduced by decreasing energy consumption during the processing and transporting of alternative materials compared to virgin ones, and preventing emissions related to disposal by diverting waste from landfills. Among the reviewed literature, Choudhary et al. investigated the direct evaluation of global warming potential (GWP) for asphalt mixtures using several types of fillers, including copper tailings (CT). They found that the utilization of CT as a filler could result in a 6% reduction in GWP for the wearing course of the flexible pavement as compared to a virgin mixture with stone dust. This reduction was due to lower GWP linked to production/availability of CT and reduced requirements for conventional aggregate [38].
Various papers indirectly highlight that utilizing mining waste in asphalt can decrease the GHG emissions. For example, enhanced microwave dicing of IOO modified HMA [46] and resources saved by use of IT [43,52,54,60], CT [38,49,55], and other mining waste [62] indicate lower energy requirements for quarrying, crushing, and transport. However, none of these studies investigated GHG reduction via LCA or direct emissions measurements. Where GWP is evaluated [38], it depends on material quantity calculations and generic emissions factors. However, these qualitative benefits come with significant uncertainties. A net reduction in GHG emissions is highly dependent on case-specific variables that are rarely quantified in the literature. These include the transportation distance from the mine site to the asphalt plant, the energy intensity of any required pre-processing of the waste (e.g., crushing, drying), and the actual energy saved by not quarrying virgin aggregates. Without detailed, comparative Life-Cycle Assessments (LCAs), any claims of GHG reductions remain speculative. Future research must prioritize such quantitative analyses to provide reliable data on the net carbon footprint of using these alternative materials and undertake comparative Life-Cycle Assessments (LCAs) to thoroughly calculate the environmental advantages of mining waste substitution.
The collective outcomes from the reviewed literature strongly support the environmental benefits of employing various mining wastes in flexible pavements, mostly through significant resource conservation and effective waste diversion [43,52,54,60]. A reliable conclusion across multiple studies using TCLP tests is the effective immobilization of potentially hazardous heavy metals by the asphalt binder, resulting in leachates that generally meet environmental quality standards [30,43,46,49,55,62]. However, a considerable knowledge gap exists in the direct quantification of greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, comprehensive Life-Cycle Assessments (LCAs) covering a wide array of impact categories and system boundaries, are especially underreported in the literature, hindering a truly holistic environmental evaluation with conventional materials. Future research should prioritize conducting detailed LCAs for various mining-waste-modified asphalts and develop standardized protocols for GHG emission accounting to vigorously validate and promote these materials as sustainable alternatives in pavement engineering.

6. Economic Impacts of Mining Waste Use in Flexible Pavements

The economic feasibility of incorporating mining waste is fundamentally linked to its performance and environmental characteristics. An improvement in pavement durability, such as enhanced rutting (Section 4.1), can lead to significant long-term cost savings in maintenance and rehabilitation. Conversely, the need for specialized additives or processing to improve properties like fatigue life and moisture susceptibility (Section 4.2 and Section 4.3) or to ensure environmental compliance can increase initial costs. This section explores these economic dimensions, to evaluate the overall financial viability of using mining wastes in asphalt.
Evaluating the economic impact of utilizing mining waste in flexible pavements is critical for defining the overall viability and encouraging sustainable practices in the road construction industry. Beyond the core aims of waste valorization and decreasing the dependence on conventional materials, the economic analysis provides critical information for decision-makers, including government institutions, private organizations, and investors. These evaluations quantify direct cost savings from material substitution, investigate potential long-term financial benefits using Life-Cycle Cost Analyses (LCCA), and consider wider economic effects such as local job creation and decreasing landfill pressure [43,46]. Justifying these economic factors is vital to overcome initial resistance, justify new technology investments, and ensure mining-waste-modified asphalt is both eco-friendly and cost-effective [54,60].
The potential for cost savings is one of the main drivers for investigating the consumption of mining waste in asphalt pavements. Several studies have emphasised direct cost savings by replacing conventional materials like limestone filler or conventional aggregates with mining wastes, which are usually available at a lower cost or even free of charge. For example, the use of iron ore tailings (IOT) as a filler can led to considerable economic benefits due to the low cost of IOT [43]. Similarly, aluminium tailing slurry (ATS) as an asphalt modifier provides significant economic benefits [62]. Cui et al. [52] note that iron tailings are significantly cheaper than limestone, approximately one-quarter of the price, which can lead to substantial cost reductions in pavement maintenance and construction. Qin et al. [62] performed a cost–benefit analysis (CBA) for aluminium tailing slurry (ATS)-modified asphalt and found that its application was profitable (BCR of 1.19), with benefits coming from the low cost of ATS and savings on other modifiers. Similarly, Wei et al. [43] conducted a cost analysis for asphalt mastic incorporating iron ore tailings (IOT) and found considerable economic benefits (BCR > 1) arising from savings in LF purchase, IOT disposal costs, and transportation if IOT sources are near processing plants. Shamsi and Zakerinejad [46] performed a cost–benefit analysis of hot-mix asphalt using iron ore overburden (IOO) residues and found that, for large-scale application across Iran, substituting IOO yields a Net Present Value saving of USD 926.4 million (at a 3.75% discount rate). In their Goharzamin mine-site case study, 9.5 km of on-site pavement using local IOO residues directly saved approximately USD 960,000. Choudhary et al. [38] found that surface courses made with specific waste fillers, such as limestone sludge dust (LD), copper tailings (CT), and glass powder (GP), were more economical than conventional stone dust courses, with CT mixes being up to 5% more economical. The reported cost reductions vary depending on the type of waste, replacement level, and local economic conditions (e.g., transportation costs for waste materials). Some studies focused on the cost of filler replacement in mastics or mixtures, while others assessed the overall pavement construction cost or the cost per ton of asphalt mix. Several studies employ comparative cost analysis based on material prices and transportation distances.
The overall economic feasibility of utilizing mining waste in flexible pavements is generally reported as positive, primarily due to material cost savings and environmental co-benefits. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) and Quantitative ROI or specific payback periods are not commonly detailed, but metrics like NPV and BCR are used. Lei et al. [49] utilized Net Present Value (NPV) and Benefit–Cost Ratio (BCR) for copper tailings powder, finding a BCR greater than 7.4, indicating a highly favourable return over a 10-year period and confirming excellent economic feasibility. Wei et al. [43] and Li et al. [50] both utilized CBA for evaluating iron tailings-based asphalt mixtures. Shamsi and Zakerinejad [46] also employed CBA for IOO pavements, considering a ten-year return period and using Net Present Value (NPV) as an economic parameter. Qin et al. [62] conducted a cost–benefit analysis for ATS-modified asphalt. Lei et al. [49] analysed economic perspectives for copper tailings powder (CTP) in asphalt mastic, also using CBA and NPV.
The studied literature, reinforced by the comparative findings in Table 7, consistently reveals that using mining waste in flexible pavements offers tangible economic benefits, mostly through direct cost savings from material replacement. Trends show that transportation costs critically influence these savings. Many studies also highlight environmental benefits that strengthen the positive economic viewpoint by reducing disposal needs. However, a significant knowledge gap remains regarding widespread LCCA application, with most analyses focusing on initial costs. The economic impacts of construction practice changes and supply chain variability for these non-traditional materials also require more research [67,68,69]. Future work should prioritize detailed LCCAs, long-term performance studies for accurate maintenance cost prediction, and developing strong supply chains for mining wastes.

7. Conclusions

This critical review has systematically synthesized and analysed the current state of research on the utilization of waste rock and tailings in asphalt pavements. The bibliometric analysis mapped the intellectual structure of the field, revealing a recent and rapid growth in research, led by institutions in countries with significant mining activity. The performance analysis demonstrates that a wide range of mining wastes can be successfully incorporated as aggregates and fillers, often enhancing key properties such as high-temperature rutting resistance. The findings strongly support the practical potential of these materials to serve as a viable and sustainable alternative to finite virgin aggregates and fillers, thereby advancing circular economy principles within the pavement industry. The utilization of this large amount of mining waste not only provides a solution for waste management but also reduces the environmental and economic burden of quarrying natural resources. To transition from laboratory feasibility to standard practice, future research must pivot to address the critical knowledge gaps identified. By systematically resolving these reservations, the pavement engineering community can develop the robust standards and specifications needed to confidently and responsibly integrate mining wastes into the road infrastructure of the future.

8. Future Recommendations

To transition from laboratory feasibility to standard practice, future research must focus to address the critical knowledge gaps identified. Based on the findings of this review, the following recommendations for future research are proposed to address the remaining knowledge gaps:
  • Future work must move beyond short-term mechanical properties by conducting long-term field monitoring of trial pavement sections under real traffic and environmental conditions. This should be complemented by laboratory research employing long-term aging protocols on asphalt mixtures (e.g., loose-mix aging followed by compaction). This will help to accurately predict the evolution of the composite material’s properties and its resistance to fatigue and low-temperature cracking over a full-service life.
  • Future research should investigate how the unique mineralogy and chemical composition of different mining wastes catalytically or physically alter the asphalt binder’s aging properties. This would involve using advanced binder aging protocols (e.g., Pressure Aging Vessel (PAV), Ultraviolet (UV) aging) and analytical techniques like Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) to understand the long-term durability of the asphalt binder.
  • A holistic understanding of the environmental and economic implications is required. This necessitates comprehensive Life-Cycle Assessments (LCA) to quantify the cradle-to-grave environmental footprint, including energy consumption and emissions. Concurrently, thorough Life-Cycle Cost Analyses (LCCA) should be performed to model the full economic impact, covering material processing, transport, construction, and long-term maintenance costs, providing asset managers with robust data for decision-making.
  • To confirm the long-term efficacy of bitumen in encapsulating heavy metals, research is needed to assess leaching behaviour under dynamic and realistic environmental conditions, such as varying pH levels and repeated freeze–thaw cycles. This will build confidence in the environmental safety of using mining wastes in pavement structures.
  • To address the significant variability in mining wastes from different sources, a critical research need is the development of a standardized characterization and classification protocol. This would link the mineralogical, chemical, and physical properties of wastes to their expected performance in asphalt, creating a foundation for reliable specifications. Research should also focus on developing cost-effective beneficiation techniques to homogenize waste materials for consistent performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.I. and N.S.M.; methodology, A.I.; software, A.I.; validation, A.I.; formal analysis, A.I.; investigation, A.I., N.S.M.; resources, A.I.; data curation, A.I.; writing—original draft preparation, A.I.; writing—review and editing, N.S.M., T.P., and A.I.; visualization, A.I., N.S.M., and T.P.; supervision, N.S.M. and T.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All data are provided in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
DSRDynamic Shear Rheometer
MSCRMultiple Stress Creep Recovery
RTFOTRolling Thin Film Oven Test
LASLinear Amplitude Sweep
HMAHot-Mix Asphalt
SMAStone Mastic Asphalt
PGPerformance Grade
CFCarbon Fibre
ESALEquivalent Single Axle Load(s)
TCLPToxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
TSRTensile Strength Ratio
SEMScanning Electron Microscope
FTIRFourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
EAFElectric Arc Furnace (slag)
MSRMarshall Stability Ratio

References

  1. Kobayashi, H.; Garnier, J.; Mulholland, D.S.; Quantin, C.; Haurine, F.; Tonha, M.; Joko, C.; Olivetti, D.; Freydier, R.; Seyler, P.; et al. Exploring a New Approach for Assessing the Fate and Behavior of the Tailings Released by the Brumadinho Dam Collapse (Minas Gerais, Brazil). J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 448, 130828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Minerals Research Institute of Western Australia Alternative Use of Tailings and Wast3. Available online: https://www.mriwa.wa.gov.au/minerals-research-advancing-western-australia/focus-areas/alternative-use-of-tailings-and-waste/ (accessed on 30 September 2024).
  3. Mineral Processing Wastes-Material Description-User Guidelines for Waste and Byproduct Materials in Pavement Construction-FHWA-RD-97-148. Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/97148/mwst1.cfm (accessed on 5 May 2025).
  4. Chapter 4: Mining Waste. Available online: https://www.sgu.se/en/itp308/knowledge-platform/4-mining-waste/ (accessed on 5 May 2025).
  5. Pickin, J.; Wardle, C.; O’farrell, K.; Stovell, L.; Nyunt, P.; Guazzo, S.; Lin, Y.; Caggiati-Shortell, G.; Chakma, P.; Edwards, C.; et al. National Waste Report 2022; Blue Environment Pty Ltd.: Docklands, Australia, 2022; pp. 1–142. [Google Scholar]
  6. Valenta, R.K.; Lèbre, É.; Antonio, C.; Franks, D.M.; Jokovic, V.; Micklethwaite, S.; Parbhakar-Fox, A.; Runge, K.; Savinova, E.; Segura-Salazar, J.; et al. Decarbonisation to Drive Dramatic Increase in Mining Waste–Options for Reduction. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 190, 106859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cox, B.; Innis, S.; Mortaza, A.; Kunz, N.C.; Steen, J. A Unified Metric for Costing Tailings Dams and the Consequences for Tailings Management. Resour. Policy 2022, 78, 102862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Carneiro, A.; Fourie, A. An Integrated Approach to Cost Comparisons of Different Tailings Management Options. In Proceedings of the Paste 2019: 22nd International Conference on Paste, Thickened and Filtered Tailings, Cape Town, South Africa, 8–10 May 2019; pp. 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vale/BHP’s Samarco to Pay $5.1 Billion in Damages for Dam Disaster|Reuters. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-damburst-deal/vale-bhps-samarco-to-pay-5-1-billion-in-damages-for-dam-disaster-idUSKCN0W42WP/ (accessed on 19 July 2025).
  10. Mallick, R.B.; Radzicki, M.J.; Zaumanis, M.; Frank, R. Use of System Dynamics for Proper Conservation and Recycling of Aggregates for Sustainable Road Construction. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2014, 86, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. de Bortoli, A. Understanding the Environmental Impacts of Virgin Aggregates: Critical Literature Review and Primary Comprehensive Life Cycle Assessments. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 415, 137629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, C.; Asbjörnsson, G.; Hulthén, E.; Evertsson, M. The Environmental Impact of Extraction: A Holistic Review of the Quarry Lifecycle. Clean. Environ. Syst. 2024, 13, 100201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rodríguez-Pacheco, R.; García, G.; Caparrós-Ríos, A.V.; Robles-Arenas, V.; García-García, C.; Millán, R.; Pérez-Sanz, A.; Alcolea-Rubio, L.A. Mineralogy, Geochemistry and Environmental Hazards of Different Types of Mining Waste from a Former Mediterranean Metal Mining Area. Land 2023, 12, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, L.; Yang, M.; Chen, Z.; Xie, Z.; Huang, L.; Osman, A.I.; Farghali, M.; Sandanayake, M.; Liu, E.; Ahn, Y.H.; et al. Conversion of Waste into Sustainable Construction Materials: A Review of Recent Developments and Prospects. Mater. Today Sustain. 2024, 27, 100930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pham, S.Q.; Burrow, M. Material Requirements for Infrastructure Development; K4D Emerging Issues Report; Institute of Development Studies: Brighton, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  16. Asphalt Market Size, Share & Trend|Report-2033. Available online: https://www.globalgrowthinsights.com/market-reports/asphalt-market-108615 (accessed on 4 May 2025).
  17. Asphalt Market Size, Growth & Analysis to 2033. Available online: https://straitsresearch.com/report/asphalt-market (accessed on 4 May 2025).
  18. Global Asphalt Market Expected to Reach USD 397.2 Million by 2033-IMARC Group. Available online: https://www.imarcgroup.com/asphalt-market-statistics (accessed on 4 May 2025).
  19. Asphalt Market to Reach USD 389.9 Million by 2032. Available online: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/10/01/2956238/0/en/Asphalt-Market-to-Reach-USD-389-9-Million-by-2032-Increasing-Infrastructure-Development-and-Growing-Demand-from-the-Construction-Industry-Propel-Market-Growth-SNS-Insider.html (accessed on 4 May 2025).
  20. Bastidas-Martínez, J.G.; Reyes-Lizcano, F.A.; Rondón-Quintana, H.A. Use of Recycled Concrete Aggregates in Asphalt Mixtures for Pavements: A Review. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2022, 9, 725–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Badiger, M.; Mamatha, K.H.; Dinesh, S.V. Use of Recycled Aggregates in Bituminous Mixes. Mater. Today Proc. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tejeshwini, S.; Mamatha, K.H.; Dinesh, S.V. Characterization of Long-Term Field Aging: Differential Impact on Rheological, Chemical, and Morphological Properties of Binders across the Lanes of Flexible Pavement. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Oluwasola, E.A.; Hainin, M.R.; Aziz, M.d.M.A.; Mahinder Singh, S.S.A. Effect of Aging on the Resilient Modulus of Stone Mastic Asphalt Incorporating Electric Arc Furnace Steel Slag and Copper Mine Tailings. In InCIEC 2014; Springer: Singapore, 2015; pp. 1199–1208. [Google Scholar]
  24. Oluwasola, E.A.; Hainin, M.R.; Aziz, M.M.A. Evaluation of Asphalt Mixtures Incorporating Electric Arc Furnace Steel Slag and Copper Mine Tailings for Road Construction. Transp. Geotech. 2015, 2, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Akin Oluwasola, E.; Hainin, R.; Aziz, M.A. Evaluation of Rutting Potential and Skid Resistance of Hot Mix Asphalt Incorporating Electric Arc Furnace Steel Slag and Copper Mine Tailing. Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci. 2015, 22, 550–558. [Google Scholar]
  26. Oluwasola, E.A.; Hainin, M.R.; Aziz, M.M.A. Comparative Evaluation of Dense-Graded and Gap-Graded Asphalt Mix Incorporating Electric Arc Furnace Steel Slag and Copper Mine Tailings. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 122, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Akin Oluwasola, E.; RosliHainin, M.; Maniruzzaman Aziz, M.A.; Arafat Yero, S. Effect of Moisture Damage on Gap-Graded Asphalt Mixture Incorporating Electric Arc Furnace Steel Slag and Copper Mine Tailings. J. Teknol. 2016, 78, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Oluwasola, E.A.; Hainin, M.R. Evaluation of Performance Characteristics of Stone Mastic Asphalt Incorporating Industrial Waste. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2016, 28, 06016016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gürer, C.; Selman, G.Ş. Investigation of Properties of Asphalt Concrete Containing Boron Waste as Mineral Filler. Medziagotyra 2016, 22, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Oluwasola, E.; Hainin, M.R.; Maniruzzaman, M.; Aziz, A.; Naqiuddin, M.; Warid, M. Volumetric Properties and Leaching Effect of Asphalt Mixes with Electric Arc Furnace Steel Slag and Copper Mine Tailings. Sains Malays. 2016, 45, 279–287. [Google Scholar]
  31. Choudhary, J.; Kumar, B.; Gupta, A. Application of Waste Materials as Fillers in Bituminous Mixes. Waste Manag. 2018, 78, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gautam, P.K.; Kalla, P.; Nagar, R.; Agrawal, R.; Jethoo, A.S. Laboratory Investigations on Hot Mix Asphalt Containing Mining Waste as Aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 168, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cesare, S.; Piergiorgio, T.; Claudio, L.; Francesco, M. Application of Mining Waste Powder as Filler in Hot Mix Asphalt. MATEC Web Conf. 2019, 274, 04002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tenza-Abril, A.J.; Saval, J.M.; García-Vera, V.E.; Solak, A.M.; Herráiz, T.R.; Ortega, J.M. Effects of Using Mine Tailings from La Unión (Spain) in Hot Bituminous Mixes Design. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Choudhary, J.; Kumar, B.; Gupta, A. Analysis and Comparison of Asphalt Mixes Containing Waste Fillers Using a Novel Ranking Methodology. J. Mater. Civil. Eng. 2020, 32, 04020064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Choudhary, J.; Kumar, B.; Gupta, A. Effect of Filler on the Bitumen-Aggregate Adhesion in Asphalt Mix. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2020, 21, 1482–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Choudhary, J.; Kumar, B.; Gupta, A. Performance Evaluation of Asphalt Concrete Mixes Having Copper Industry Waste as Filler. In Proceedings of the Transportation Research Procedia; Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 48, pp. 3656–3667. [Google Scholar]
  38. Choudhary, J.; Kumar, B.; Gupta, A. Evaluation of Engineering, Economic and Environmental Suitability of Waste Filler Incorporated Asphalt Mixes and Pavements. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2021, 22, S624–S640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Choudhary, J.; Kumar, B.; Gupta, A. Analysing the Influence of Industrial Waste Fillers on the Ageing Susceptibility of Asphalt Concrete. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2022, 23, 3906–3919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ullah, S.; Wan, S.; Yang, C.; Ma, X.; Dong, Z. Self-Stress and Deformation Sensing of Electrically Conductive Asphalt Concrete Incorporating Carbon Fiber and Iron Tailings. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2022, 29, e2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ullah, S.; Yang, C.; Cao, L.; Wang, P.; Chai, Q.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Dong, Z.; Lushinga, N.; Zhang, B. Material Design and Performance Improvement of Conductive Asphalt Concrete Incorporating Carbon Fiber and Iron Tailings. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 303, 124446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, Q.; He, Y.; Wang, K.; Jiao, C.; Zhu, W.; Wang, J. Performance of SMA Mixture Added Iron Tailings Coarse Aggregate; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; ISBN 9780367726102. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wei, Z.; Jia, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Gao, Y. Utilization of Iron Ore Tailing as an Alternative Mineral Filler in Asphalt Mastic: High-Temperature Performance and Environmental Aspects. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 335, 130318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wei, Z.; Jia, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Huang, X.; Gao, Y. Influence of Iron Tailing Filler on Rheological Behavior of Asphalt Mastic. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 352, 129047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Calandra, P.; Quaranta, S.; Apolo Miranda Figueira, B.; Caputo, P.; Porto, M.; Oliviero Rossi, C. Mining Wastes to Improve Bitumen Performances: An Example of Circular Economy. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2022, 614, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shamsi, M.; Zakerinejad, M. Production of Sustainable Hot Mix Asphalt from the Iron Ore Overburden Residues. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 2023, 123, 103926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. de Moraes, T.M.R.P.; Neto, O.d.M.M.; Lucena, A.E.d.F.L.; Lucena, L.d.F.L.; Nascimento, M.S. Viability of Asphalt Mixtures with Iron Ore Tailings as a Partial Substitute for Fine Aggregate. Transp. Res. Rec. 2024, 2678, 770–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. García, L.M.; Betancourt, S.; Rodríguez, E.; Ribeiros, L.F.M.; de Farias, M.M. Use of Mining Wastes in Asphalt Concretes Production. Rev. Ing. Constr. 2023, 38, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lei, B.; Li, X.; Guo, Y.; Qu, F.; Zhao, C.; Tam, V.W.Y.; Wu, V.; Li, W. Recycling of Copper Tailing as Filler Material in Asphalt Paving Mastic: A Sustainable Solution for Mining Waste Recovery. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2024, 20, e03237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, J.; Sha, A.; Wang, Z.; Song, R.; Cao, Y. Investigation of the Self-Healing, Road Performance and Cost–Benefit Effects of an Iron Tailing/Asphalt Mixture in Pavement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 422, 135788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wei, H.; Lu, R.; Li, J.; Yao, Z.; Zheng, J. Investigation on Synergistic Flame Retardancy of Modified Asphalt Using Tungsten Mine Tailings and Aluminum Trihydrate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 451, 138891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cui, Y.; Si, C.; Li, S.; Jia, Y.; Guo, B. Iron Tailings as Mineral Fillers and Their Effect on the Fatigue Performance of Asphalt Mastic. Materials 2024, 17, 2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xue, J.; Liu, S.; Xu, M.; Ling, M.; Sun, J.; Li, H.; Kang, X. Temperature Field Characterization of Iron Tailings Based on Microwave Maintenance Technology. Materials 2024, 17, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, S.; Zhang, Z.; Si, C.; Shi, X.; Cui, Y.; Bao, B.; Zhang, Q. Evaluation of the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Mastic Incorporating Iron Tailings Filler as an Alternative to Limestone Filler. J. Clean. Prod. 2025, 486, 144444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Guo, Y.; Qu, F.; Tiwari, R.; Yoo, D.Y.; Wang, K.; Wang, Y.; Li, W. Development of Self-Sensing Asphalt Cementitious Composites Using Conductive Carbon Fibre and Recycled Copper Tailing. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 474, 140965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Aria, M.; Cuccurullo, C. Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, D.; Wei, J.; Wu, Z.; Hu, L.; Yang, L.; Cheng, K. The High Value Utilization Characteristics of Coal Gangue Powder with Emulsified Asphalt Mastic through Rheological and Viscoelastic Damage Theory. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Silveira, V.L.; Guimarães, A.C.R.; Coelho, L.M.; dos Santos, W.W.; da Silveira, P.H.P.M.; Monteiro, S.N. Recycling Iron Ore Waste through Low-Cost Paving Techniques. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mendonça, W.M.; Marques, G.L.O.; Gomes, G.J.C. Geotechnical Performance of Isotropic and Foliated Quartzite Waste as Aggregate for Road Base and Asphalt Mixture. Transp. Geotech. 2024, 46, 101242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cao, L.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, T.; Dong, Z.; Tian, Z. Utilization of Iron Tailings as Aggregates in Paving Asphalt Mixture: A Sustainable and Eco-Friendly Solution for Mining Waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 375, 134126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Alhomaidat, F.; Al-Kheetan, M.J.; Alosifat, S.M. Recycling Phosphate Mine Waste Rocks in Asphalt Mixtures to Fully Replace Natural Aggregate: A Preliminary Study. Results Eng. 2025, 25, 104324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Qin, Y.; Xie, K.; Meng, Y.; Fu, T.; Fang, G.; Luo, X.; Wang, Q. Feasibility and Environmental Assessment of Reusing Aluminum Tailing Slurry in Asphalt. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 411, 134737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, M.; Wu, G.; Fini, E.H.; Obando, C.J.; Yu, M.; Zou, W. Effect of Taconite on Healing and Thermal Characteristics of Asphalt Binder. J. Mater. Civil. Eng. 2021, 33, 04021334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Guimarães, A.C.R.; de Arêdes, M.L.A.; Castro, C.D.; Coelho, L.M.; Monteiro, S.N. Evaluation of the Mechanical Behavior of Asphaltic Mixtures Utilizing Waste of the Processing of Iron Ore. Mining 2024, 4, 889–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. BS EN 13043:2013; Aggregates for Bituminous Mixtures and Surface Treatments for Roads, Airfields and Other Trafficked Areas. British Standards Institution: London, UK, 2013.
  66. Giustozzi, F.; Mansour, K.; Patti, F.; Pannirselvam, M.; Fiori, F. Shear Rheology and Microstructure of Mining Material-Bitumen Composites as Filler Replacement in Asphalt Mastics. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 171, 726–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mashaan, N.S.; Dassanayake, C. Rutting and Aging Properties of Recycled Polymer-Modified Pavement Materials. Recycling 2025, 10, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mashaan, N.; Yogi, B. Mining Waste Materials in Road Construction. Encyclopedia 2025, 5, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mashaan, N.S.; De Silva, A. Review on Assessment and Performance Mechanism Evaluation of Non-Structural Concrete Incorporating Waste Materials. Appl. Mech. 2024, 5, 579–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Research Methodology.
Figure 1. Research Methodology.
Jcs 09 00402 g001
Figure 2. Annual Scientific Production.
Figure 2. Annual Scientific Production.
Jcs 09 00402 g002
Figure 3. Geographical Distribution of Publications by Country of Corresponding Author.
Figure 3. Geographical Distribution of Publications by Country of Corresponding Author.
Jcs 09 00402 g003
Figure 4. Most Relevant Publication Sources.
Figure 4. Most Relevant Publication Sources.
Jcs 09 00402 g004
Figure 5. Sankey Diagram of Institutions, Countries, and Journals (Three-Field Plot).
Figure 5. Sankey Diagram of Institutions, Countries, and Journals (Three-Field Plot).
Jcs 09 00402 g005
Table 1. General Characteristics and Roles of Common Mining Waste Types in Flexible Pavements.
Table 1. General Characteristics and Roles of Common Mining Waste Types in Flexible Pavements.
Mining Waste TypePredominant Chemical ComponentsTypical Physical CharacteristicsRole(s) in Flexible PavementRef.
Coal Gangue Powder (CGP)High SiO2 contentFine powder, Density = 2.27 g/cm3Filler in Asphalt Mastic[57]
Phosphate Mine Waste Rock (PMWR)SiO2 (18.09%), CaO (37.47.75%), Al2O3 (1.38%), P2O5 (2.86%)Crushed rock aggregate, Specific Gravity = 2.455 g/cm3, Water Absorption = 9.19%Aggregate in Asphalt mixture[61]
Iron Tailings Filler (ITF)SiO2 (66.70%), Fe2O3 (9.52.5%), CaO (4.56%), Al2O3 (8.06.1%)Fine powder (0.075 mm), density = 2.36 g/cm3, Smooth, angular particles with well-defined edgesFiller in Asphalt Mastic[54]
Copper Tailings (CT)SiO2 (49.24%), Al2O3 (21.19%), Fe2O3 (6.63%), CaO (6.75%), K2O (9.02%)Fine powder (0.075 mm), Larger angularity, higher surface area, rough surfaceAggregate in Asphalt mixture[55]
Iron Tailings (IT)Magnetite (Fe3O4), quartz (SiO2), actinolite, chlorite, apatite, hematite (Fe2O3),Aggregate size (4.75–9.5 mm, 4.75–13.2 mm, 9.5–13.2 mm), density = 2.8 g/cm3, Angular, rough-textured particles, Magnetic properties notedAggregate in Asphalt mixture[53]
Copper Tailings Powder (CTP)SiO2 (49.24%), Al2O3 (21.19%), Fe2O3 (6.63%), CaO (6.75%), K2O (9.02%)Fine powder (0.075 mm), Density = 2.87 g/cm3, Angular and rough surfaceFiller in Asphalt Mastic[49]
Iron Tailings (IT)SiO2 (~68%), CaO (~7%), Al2O3 (1~8%), Fe2O3 (~7%)Fine powder (0.075 mm), Angular shape, Density = 3.02 g/cm3Filler in Asphalt Mastic[52]
Tungsten Mine Tailings (TMT)SiO2 (53.21%), Al2O3 (19.74%), CaO (9.85%), Fe2O3 (3.41%)Fine powder, strongly hydrophilicModifier in Asphalt binder[51]
Iron Tailing Filler (ITF)SiO2 (~51%), CaO (~9.5%)Fine powder, Irregular shape density = 2.785 g/cm3 Filler in Asphalt mixture[50]
Isotropic Quartzite Waste (IQ)Quartz (83.2%), muscovite, (16.8%)Crushed Aggregate, Density ≈ 2.65 g/cm3Aggregate in Asphalt mixture[59]
Foliated Quartzite Waste (FQ)Quartz (73.2%), kyanite (18.5%), muscovite (3.6.8%)Crushed Aggregate, Density ≈ 2.84 g/cm3Aggregate in Asphalt mixture[59]
Aluminium Tailing Slurry (ATS)Al2O3 (50.12%), SiO2 (19.79%), Fe2O3 (25.05%), TiO2 (2.43%)Fine powder (0.075 mm), density = 3.07 g/cm3, irregular, coarse-textured particles with fine attached grainsModifier in Asphalt Binder[62]
Iron Ore Tailings (IOT)SiO2 (29.4%), Fe2O3 (38.1%), Al2O3 (22.8%), MgO (7.9%) Fine particlesAggregate in Asphalt mixture[47]
Iron Ore Overburden (IOO)SiO2 (43.15%), Fe2O3 (24.78%), Al2O3 (15.79%), Cao (7.2%)Crushed rock aggregate (various sizes)Aggregate in Asphalt mixture[46]
Iron TailingsSiO2 (63.47%), Al2O3 (12.55%), Fe2O3 (9.79%), CaO (3.59%)Coarse and Fine, density = 2.8 g/cm3, Smooth textureAggregate in Asphalt mixture[60]
Iron Ore Tailings (IOT)SiO2 (28.85%), CaO (15.23%), Al2O3 (13%), Fe2O3 (29.19%), Fine powder (0.075 mm), Density = 3.09 g/cm3, Smooth and Angular shapeFiller in Asphalt Mastic[43]
Manganese Ore TailingsAl2O3 (34.10%), SiO2 (46.95%), MnO (14.95%), Fe2O3 (7.33%)Fine powder, Density = 2.95 g/cm3Modifier in Asphalt Binder[45]
Table 2. Summary of Studies on the Performance of Modified Flexible Pavement.
Table 2. Summary of Studies on the Performance of Modified Flexible Pavement.
Mining WasteUtilizedDosage %Binder and Mixture TypeKey FindingsOptimum ContentRef.
Copper tailings (CT)Filler0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%AH-70 bitumen
AC-13 mixture
CT substitution increases high-temperature rutting resistance but degrades low-temperature cracking resistance and moisture susceptibility above 50%.50%[55]
Phosphate mine waste rockAggregate100%Pen 60/70100% PMWR mix: 20% Cantabro loss vs. 17% for limestone; SEM showed weak binder–aggregate interface; FTIR revealed PO43− bands causing increased brittleness.≤40%[61]
Iron tailings (IT)Filler in Asphalt Mastic20%, 50%, 80%, 100%Bitumen 70#Increasing IT content lowers high-temperature performance and fatigue response. Binder–filler interaction is purely physical and weakens with more IT. Addition of 1.5% silane coupling agent (SCA) substantially restores and even enhances rheological properties.80% ITF (with 20% LF) plus 1.5% SCA for best rheological improvement; 100% ITF for greatest economic benefit[54]
Coal gangue powder (CGP)Filler in Asphalt Mastic0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.5Bitumen 70#
Emulsified Asphalt Mastic (EAM)
Higher filler content and (Rotating Thin Film Oven Test) RTFOT aging improve high-temperature stability and stress sensitivity but reduce fatigue resistance. EAM with CGP and Portland Cement outperforms Limestone Powder-filled mastic at high temperature, whereas LP-mastic retains better fatigue resistance; CGP is a viable green filler.1.2–1.5 for CGP yields optimal high-temperature performance with minimal fatigue loss[57]
Copper tailings powder (CTP)Filler in Asphalt Mastic0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2AH-70 BitumenCT’s rough surface and higher specific surface area enhanced high-temperature rutting resistance; low-temperature cracking and moisture stability slightly declined but remained acceptable.1.2 for maximal rutting resistance with balanced overall performance[49]
Iron tailingsAggregate4.75–9.5 mm;
4.75–13.2 mm;
9.5–13.2 mm
SBS Class I-C modified asphaltSpecimens with 4.75–13.2 mm tailings achieved the best heating (126 °C in 2 min) and superior road performance (dynamic stability, direct-tension strength, immersion and freeze–thaw resistance).4.75–13.2 mm[53]
Tungsten mine tailings (TMT)Composite flame-retardant modifier with aluminium trihydrate (ATH)ATH/TMTs ratios of 5%/2%, 10%/4%, 15%/6%, 20%/8%70# SBS-free road asphaltIncreased in softening point and decreased in penetration and ductility. Limiting oxygen impact increased significantly, showing enhanced flame retardancy property. Maintains good low-temperature cracking resistance. Thermal stability improved due to denser and more compact char layer blocking heat and mass transfer.5% ATH + 6% TMTs[51]
Iron tailingsFiller in Asphalt Mastic1.0Bitumen 70#ITs are primarily quartz and highly angular. Lower adhesion energy as compared to limestone but strong filler–asphalt interaction. LAS fatigue life meets performance requirement.1.0[52]
Aluminium tailing slurry (ATS)Modifier3%, 6%, 9%, 12%, and 15%Bitumen 70#ATS increased the complex modulus (G*), rutting factor (G*/sin δ), and recovery rate (R) but decreased the phase angle (δ) and nonrecoverable compliance (Jnr). Enhanced thermal stability, slightly reduced “bee” structures. Storage stability drops significantly above 9%, no pollution risk and strong economic benefits.9%[62]
Iron ore wasteAggregateM2: 20%.
M3: 17%
CAP 50/70For medium traffic level of N = 5 × 106, M1 and M3 gave identical layer thickness (6.9 cm) and fatigue class 1; M2 had thicker layer (8.2 cm) and fatigue class 0 but still met cracked-area limits.17% (M3)[64]
Quartzite wasteAggregate100%Pen 50/70Isotropic (IAM) and foliated (FAM) quartzite met ITS (>0.65 MPa) and Marshall stability; IAM showed higher stiffness, both fulfilled MeDiNa fatigue and rutting limits for medium traffic.100%[59]
Iron tailings (IT)Filler20%, 40%, 60%, 80%Bitumen 70#IT improved microwave heating and healing, 60% and 80% IT boosted healing capacity by 2.5× and 2.75× after five cycles; high-temperature stability and moisture resistance remained acceptable.40%[50]
Nickel (A)/Cobalt (C) tailingsFiller100%CA 50–70Mineral residue volumetric parameters remain within specification. Stability increased by 17% (A) and 9% (C). No significant changes in flow, stiffness, tensile strength, or Cantabro abrasion. Technically viable and offers environmental benefit by valorizing waste.100%[48]
Iron ore tailings (IOT)Aggregate7.5%, 10%, 12.5%Pen 50/7012.5% IOT mix showed highest tensile strength, resilient modulus, fatigue life, and permanent-deformation resistance. Reduced production cost per km and surface temperature by 2.9 °C.12.5%[47]
Iron ore overburden (IOO)Aggregate0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%Pen 60/70
PG 70–16
Mechanical properties (Marshall stability, flow, volumetric parameters) remain within specifications even at 100% IOO. Environmental (TCLP) tests show heavy metals below hazardous limits, indicating solidification by bitumen. Electrical volume resistivity reduced (improved conductivity) and microwave de-icing efficiency up to 15.74 times. Cost–benefit analysis reveals positive NPV (e.g., USD 926 M nationwide, USD 0.96 M pilot project).100%[46]
Iron tailings (IT)Aggregate100%Pen 70
AC-20 HMA
All tailings mixes exceed minimum rutting stability requirements, but coarse tailing replacements degrade low-temperature cracking and moisture resistance, especially tailing–sand mix. Performance enhancements using limestone fine aggregate, composite modified asphalt, hydrated lime, or silane coupling agent restore and exceed specification for rutting, cracking, and TSR.100% combined with composite (SBS and Crumb rubber) modified binder and either 1.7% hydrated lime or 0.4% silane coupling agent[60]
Iron tailings (IT)Filler in Asphalt Mastic0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2Pen 60/70IT enhances viscosity, rutting factor, and elastic recovery. Smaller particle size and larger specific surface area improve adsorption and stiffening effect. Leaching tests confirm environmental safety. Cost–benefit analysis shows economic viability.1.0[43]
Iron tailingAggregateCarbon fibre (CF) to tailing = 1:3Pen 70
AC-13 HMA
Adequate mechanical strength and low resistivity. Negative fractional changes in electrical resistance (FCR) under low stress (compaction), reversible/irreversible FCR under medium/high stress enable microcrack detection. The mixture functions as an intrinsic damage sensor until macrocracking occurs.CF: TA 1:3[40]
Manganese ore tailingsFiller1%, 3%, 5%, 10%Pen 50/70Improved resistance to stress, rutting, and fatigue. Anti-aging effect observed at 10% w/w. Favourable physio-chemical interactions between bitumen and filler.10%[45]
Iron tailings (IT)Filler in Asphalt Mastic0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2Pen 60/80Improved viscosity, complex modulus, and creep stiffness but decreased phase angle, viscosity–temperature susceptibility, and m-value. Enhances anti-rutting but excess IT greater than 1.0 reduces workability and low-temp cracking.1.0[44]
Copper tailings (CT)Filler4%, 5.5%, 7%, 8.5%VG-30Alternate fillers match or exceed stone dust in strength, rutting, and ravelling, governed by particle fineness, air-voids, and film thickness. Moisture resistance depends on filler mineralogy and film thickness, calcium-based fillers (kota stone, red mud) outperform silica-based (CT, glass powder). Ageing sensitivity: tensile strength ratio, Cantabro loss, Marshall quotient, and Marshall stability depend on both filler type and content, while indirect tensile strength ageing is driven solely by dosage.CT 5.5%[39]
Iron tailings (IT)Aggregate100%SBS Type I-D modified asphalt
SMA
Iron tailings meet all current specification requirements. High-temperature stability slightly (~20%) lower than basalt but meets the minimum requirement. Immersion and freeze–thaw TSR both greatly exceed specification limits.100%[42]
Iron tailingsAggregateTailing aggregate (TA): Natural Aggregate = 1:3 (25% TA)
Carbon Fibre = 0.1–1.4% by mix weight
Bitumen 70#
Dense-graded AC-13
Combined CF + TA (25% TA, 0.2–0.4% CF) yields optimum conductive mixes with enhanced electrical conductivity and improved mechanical performance; 0.4TNA mix shows reliable, reversible resistance change under both tensile and compressive loading for self-sensing functionality.0.4% CF + 25% TA[38]
Copper tailings (CT)Filler100%PG 76-XXWaste fillers produced mixes with similar or better strength, rutting, and moisture resistance than stone dust; limestone slurry dust (LD) was best, rice straw ash (RSA) worst; except GP, all mixes met TSR ≥ 80%; LD showed highest rut and crack resistance.100%[38]
TaconiteFiller in Asphalt Mastic0%, 10%, 20%, 30%PG 64–22Healing index and thermal conductivity both increase with taconite content; best healing at 900 s, 5% strain, 50% damage; thermal conductivity rises from 0.1582 to 0.1870 W/(m·K) across dosages.30%[63]
Copper tailings (CT)Filler100%Pen 60/70CT-filled mixes achieved satisfactory Marshall stability and volumetrics at lower asphalt demand; superior rutting and cracking resistance; slightly lower moisture and ravelling resistance due to high silica content.100%[37]
Copper tailings (CT)Filler4%, 5.5%, 7%, 8.5%VG-30Filler type and dosage significantly affect both active (mixability) and passive (moisture) adhesion. Ca-based fillers (natural stone dust and Kota stone dust) markedly improved both adhesions; Si-based glass powder showed the poorest adhesion.4%[36]
Copper tailings (CT)Filler100%VG-30All mixes met Marshall and volumetric criteria. Finer fillers (red mud, CT, carbide lime, glass powder) enhanced cracking and rutting resistance. Ca-based (carbide lime, stone dust) mixes excelled in adhesion and moisture resistance; glass powder mixes underperformed. Red mud ranked best overall, rice straw worst.100%[35]
Well Cuttings (WC)Aggregate100%35/50 bitumen AC-16 Surf mix (AC-WC)Similar performance to control mix (porphyry); compliant with PG-3. Higher ITS and fatigue resistance at 5% bitumen. Good resistance to permanent deformation and acceptable water sensitivity above 4.5% binder.100%[34]
Mine Tailings (MT)Aggregate100%35/50 bitumen AC-16 Surf mix (AC-MT)Required higher binder content due to higher porosity; showed good Marshall stability and fatigue resistance but failed water sensitivity (ITSR < 85%) at all binder levels.Not viable (failed ITSR)[34]
Tungsten residueFiller100%Pen 50/70, HMAMWP meets EN 13043 [65] gradation, similar viscoelastic behaviour to limestone filler, lower voids of dry compacted filler (28.1%) indicate lower bitumen absorption, improved resistance to permanent deformation in MSCR test, higher Marshall stability and ITS compared to control.100%[33]
Magnetite powderFiller in Asphalt Mastic0.5, 1.0, 1.5C170 and C320Magnetite-based mastics exhibited reduced temperature and loading-time susceptibility, higher stiffness and elastic response at elevated temperatures compared to limestone-filled mastics; no major particle clustering; ferromagnetic properties enable induction or microwave crack-healing application.≥1.0[66]
Kota stone mining waste (LSW)Aggregate0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%VG-30, Bituminous concrete (BC), Dense Bituminous Concrete macadam (DBM)Up to 50% replacement in BC and 25% in DBM met all Marshall design criteria, moisture susceptibility, rutting resistance, and resilient modulus requirements; higher replacement levels caused decreased stability, increased flow and permanent deformation, and lowered ITS/TSR.50% for BC; 25% for DBM[32]
Copper slag (CT)Filler100%VG-30, DBMAll seven fillers met Indian paving specifications. Finer particles (red mud and limestone dust) increased stiffness and cracking resistance. Porous fillers like copper tailings, rice straw, and red mud raised air voids, driving higher bitumen demand. Calcium-rich fillers (CT, limestone dust) gave superior moisture resistance and adhesion while silica-rich wastes (glass powder, rice straw ash, brick dust) showed poorer moisture performance.100%[31]
Copper mine tailingsAggregateMix 1: 0%
Mix 2: 20% CT
Mix 3: 80% EAF slag + 20% CT
Mix 4: 40% EAF slag + 20% CT
Pen 80–100, ACW 14Mix 3 showed higher VMA, and adequate VTM/VFA and Marshall stability as compared to control. All met JKR volumetric specs and TCLP leachate concentrations of Cu, Cr, Pb, Cd, and Ni well below regulatory limits.Mix 3[30]
Boron WasteFiller4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%Pen 50/70, HMAStability decreases when filler >6% due to thinner asphalt film, control (6% limestone) had highest stability. Highest density obtained at 5% filler, matching control’s impermeability. 7% boron filler showed lowest Marshall stability loss after 48 h immersion (9.7%). Stiffness modulus at 10 °C and 20 °C for 6% boron filler almost identical to control.5.7%[29]
Copper mine tailings (CT)AggregatesMix 1: 0%
Mix 2: 80% Granite, 20% CT
Mix 3: 80% EAF Steel Slag, 20% CT
Mix 4: 40% EAF Steel Slag, 40% Granite, 20% CT
PG 76–22 and 5% EVA-modified Pen 80/100, SMA14All mixes with EAF slag + CT outperformed the control. Mix 3 showed the highest stiffness (resilient modulus), the lowest permanent deformation (axial strain and CSS), and the shallowest rut. Moisture susceptibility (TSR) remained within allowable limits. EVA-modified binder further increased stiffness and rutting susceptibility compared to PG 76–22.Mix 3[28]
Copper mine tailings (CT)AggregatesMix 1: 0%,
Mix 2: 20% CT
Mix 3: 20% EAF
Mix 4: 40% combined CT + EAF
PG 76–22 and 5% EVA-modified Pen 80/100, SMA14Waste-incorporated mixes require slightly higher OBC and show increased Marshall stability and bulk specific gravity compared to control. Moisture conditioning (24 h/48 h) reduces retained strength index (RSI) but all mixes stay ≥ 75%. Wet samples exhibit higher abrasion loss; EVA modification lowers abrasion loss vs. PG 76. Tensile strength ratio (TSR) ≥ 80% for all except Mix 3 with PG 76 at 48 h.Mix 4[27]
Copper mine tailings (CT)AggregatesMix 1: 0%
Mix 2: 0% EAF / 20% CT
Mix 3: 80% EAF / 20% CT
Mix 4: 40% EAF/20% CT/40% granite
PG 76–22 and 5% EVA-modified Pen 80/100, SMA14, ACW14Mix 3 showed up to a 77.7% reduction in rut depth and 42.9% reduction in creep strain slope compared to control. All mixes with EAF/CT had TSR ≥ 80% except mix 3 (SMA14 -PG76). TCLP leachates for heavy metals well below EPA limits.Mix 3[26]
Copper mine tailings (CT)AggregatesMix 1: 0%
Mix 2: 20% CT
Mix 3: 80% EAF slag + 20% CT
Mix 4: 40% EAF slag + 20% CT
PG 76–22 and Pen 80/100, ACW14Mix 3 showed the lowest final rut depth and rutting rate; after 4000 APA cycles it had already reached 70–80% of its total rut depth, indicating rapid initial densification. Mix 3 achieved the highest British Pendulum Number (↑29.3% for PG76–22; ↑20.5% for 80/100) and mean texture depth, owing to the sharp edges and angular and rough texture of slag and tailings.Mix 3[25]
Copper mine tailings (CT)AggregatesMix 1: 0%
Mix 2: 20% CT
Mix 3: 80% EAF slag + 20% CT
Mix 4: 40% EAF slag + 20% CT
PG 76–22 and Pen 80/100, ACW14Substituting granite with CT and EAF slag markedly improved Marshall stability, stiffness (MQ), and resilient modulus. Moisture susceptibility remained acceptable (TSR > 80%). Mix 3 gave the best overall performance. Aging increased stiffness and dynamic creep modulus.Mix 3[24]
Copper mine tailings (CT)AggregatesMix 1: 0%
Mix 2: 15% CT
Mix 3: 83% EAF slag + 15% CT
Mix 4: 41% EAF slag + 15% CT
PG 76, SMA14EAF slag and CT mixes significantly reduced binder drain-down compared to control. Resilient modulus at 25 °C and 40 °C was higher in all waste-containing mixes under unaged, short term, and long-term aging. Mix 3 showed the largest gains, especially after long-term aging.Mix 3[23]
Table 3. Rutting Performance of Asphalt Containing Mining Wastes.
Table 3. Rutting Performance of Asphalt Containing Mining Wastes.
Minig WasteUtilisationRutting Test Method(s)Key Rutting FindingsRef.
Coal gangue powder (CGP)Asphalt masticMSCR (0.1/3.2 kPa at 64 °C & 70 °C)CGP mastic exhibited lower non-recoverable creep compliance Jnr as compared to limestone powder, corresponding to a PG70E (after RTFO) classification and enhanced high-temperature stability.[57]
Iron tailings (IT)Asphalt masticMSCR (0.1, 3.2, 6.4, & 12.8 kPa at 64 °C)Replacing limestone with IT with SCA modification significantly decreased Jnr and increased elastic recovery (%R), indicating improved rutting resistance in IT-modified mastics.[54]
Copper tailings (CT)Asphalt mixtureWheel-tracking test (300 × 300 × 50 mm slabs, 0.7 MPa loading @ 60 °C, 42 cycles/min)CT/carbon fibre composites achieved higher dynamic stability depth than control; substituting up to 50% CT optimizes high-temp rutting performance.[55]
Iron tailings Asphalt mixtureWheel-tracking test (300 × 300 × 50 mm slabs, 0.7 MPa loading @ 60 °C, 42 cycles/min)Iron tailings-based mixtures showed a 16.55% higher dynamic stability than basalt mixtures under identical test conditions, reflecting superior resistance to high-temperature rutting.[53]
Copper tailings powder (CTP)Asphalt masticDSR temperature sweep; rutting factor (G*/sin δ)Replacing limestone with copper tailings boosted |G*| by 35–65% at all filler-to-asphalt ratios and correspondingly raised |G*|/sin δ, demonstrating enhanced rutting resistance.[49]
Tungsten mine tailings (TMTs) + ATHAsphalt BinderDSR temperature sweep; rutting factor (G*/sin δ)The composite asphalt with 20% ATH + 6% TMTs achieved G*/sin δ >15 kPa at 52 °C, demonstrating substantially improved rutting resistance versus unmodified binder.[51]
Quartzite wasteAsphalt mixtureMeDiNa simulationsPredicted permanent deformation (rut) depths remained below 6 mm over five million passes for quartzite mixtures, indicating satisfactory rutting performance for pavement applications.[59]
Aluminium tailings slurry (ATS)Asphalt masticDSR temperature sweep; rutting factor (G*/sin δ); MSCR at 54 °C (0.1/3.2 kPa)Rutting factor (G*/sin δ) increased with higher ATS dosages, indicating better rutting resistance. At 9% ATS dosage, non-recoverable creep compliance Jnr dropped by 26% and recovery R increased by 43% at 0.1 kPa, confirming enhanced high-temperature rutting resistance.[62]
Table 4. Fatigue Performance of Asphalt Containing Mining Wastes.
Table 4. Fatigue Performance of Asphalt Containing Mining Wastes.
Waste MaterialUtilizationFatigue Test Method(s)Key Fatigue FindingsRef.
Iron tailings (IT)Asphalt masticsDSR-LAS at 20 °C; strains 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%Finest, angular IT mastic reached Nf@5% ≈ 1.09 × 107 vs. limestone’s 1.34 × 107. Gray correlation (r ≈ 0.58) linked fatigue life to adhesion energy and binder–filler interaction, highlighting particle morphology’s role.[52]
Iron tailings (IT)Asphalt masticsDSR-LAS; at 20 °C; strains 2.5%, 5%, Unmodified IT mastic drops fatigue life Nf by 7.1% at 2.5% strain and 15.5% at 5% strain versus limestone controls, while SCA nearly restored and for 80% IT exceeded the fatigue life by improving binder–filler adhesion.[54]
Coal gangue powder (CGP)Asphalt masticsDSR-(LAS) (2.5% and 5% strain); pre- and post-RTFOT agingUnaged CGP mastic fatigue life Nf at P/B = 0.9, 1.2, and 1.5 dropped by 50.8%, 21.1%, and 8.2%, respectively, versus P/B = 0.6 baseline. Post-RTFOT 0.6 and 1.5 fatigue life fell by 47.7% and 40.4%, respectively.[57]
Manganese ore tailingsAsphalt BinderDSR time-sweepFatigue parameter G*·sin δ increases with manganese content, indicating reduced fatigue resistance.[45]
Iron tailings (IT)Asphalt mixtureIndirect tensile fatigue testMixes with 7.5% and 10% iron tailings outperformed the control at low stress levels, while the 12.5% tailings blend achieved the highest cycles-to-failure across all stresses, demonstrating the best overall fatigue resistance.[47]
Iron ore wasteAsphalt mixtureControlled
stress fatigue life tests
MeDiNa simulations
The mixture containing 20% iron ore waste (M2) exhibited a slightly reduced fatigue performance compared to the reference mix. In contrast, the mix with 17% waste matched or slightly exceeded the control’s fatigue resistance, indicating that moderate incorporation of mining waste does not reduce and may even enhance fatigue life.[64]
Isotropic quartzite waste (IAM)
Foliated quartzite waste (FAM)
Asphalt mixtureIndirect tensile fatigue test
MeDiNa simulations
FAM exhibits a higher number of cycles-to-failure at a given resilient strain (regression R2 > 0.8), indicating slightly better lab fatigue resistance than IAM. Both IAM and FAM meet the MeDiNa-predicted limits (≤30% cracked area and ≤ 20 mm rut depth) up to 5 × 106 ESAL[59]
Table 5. Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Containing Mining Wastes.
Table 5. Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Containing Mining Wastes.
Waste MaterialUtilizationMoisture Test Method(s)Key Moisture Susceptibly FindingsRef.
Copper tailings Asphalt masticPull-Off Adhesion TestCopper tailings can be reused as asphalt mastic filler with acceptable moisture durability especially at moderate filler content (F/A ≈ 0.6), while higher tailings contents accelerate moisture damage.[49]
Copper tailings (CT)Asphalt mixtureImmersion MSR
Freeze–thaw splitting TSR
Both MSR and the TSR decrease as CT content increases. Mixtures with up to 50% CT still meet the specification criteria, whereas 75% and 100% CT fail to comply.[55]
Iron tailingsAsphalt mixtureImmersion MSR
Freeze–thaw splitting TSR
All iron tailings mixtures easily exceed the 80% specification threshold for both MSR and TSR, despite slight reductions compared to the basalt control.[53]
Isotropic quartzite waste (IAM)
Foliated quartzite waste (FAM)
Asphalt mixtureFreeze–thaw splitting TSRAsphalt mixtures with IAM and FAM retain over 85% of their tensile strength after freeze–thaw, comfortably meeting specification requirements.[59]
Iron tailingsAsphalt mixtureFreeze–thaw splitting TSRIron tailings coarse aggregate from TB can be used without special anti-stripping measures (TSR > 75%), but TA tailings and tailings sand (TS) cause TSR values below specification (especially TS < 70%), indicating significantly increased moisture susceptibility.[60]
Iron tailingsAsphalt mixtureFreeze–thaw splitting TSRMixtures with 25% iron tailing and 0.2–0.6% carbon fibre (CF) maintained TSR > 75% after conditioning, confirming moisture stability.[41]
Copper tailings (CT)Asphalt mixtureFreeze–thaw splitting TSRCooper tailings mixture shows TSR value of 84.24%, exceeding the 80% minimum requirement specified for adequate moisture resistance.[38]
Copper tailings (CT)Asphalt mixtureFreeze–thaw splitting TSRCopper tailings (TSR = 84.24%) exceed the 80% specification requirements, demonstrating that using copper tailings as filler maintains adequate moisture resistance, with only a modest reduction compared to the conventional stone-dust control.[37]
Copper tailings (CT)Asphalt mixtureFreeze–thaw splitting TSRCopper tailings mixes achieved a TSR of 84.24%, exceeding the 80% minimum requirement and demonstrating that CT can be used as an effective asphalt filler without compromising moisture resistance.[35]
Table 6. Summary of Heavy Metal Leaching Test Results for Asphalt Containing Mining Wastes (concentrations in mg/L from TCLP or similar tests on asphalt product/waste as specified).
Table 6. Summary of Heavy Metal Leaching Test Results for Asphalt Containing Mining Wastes (concentrations in mg/L from TCLP or similar tests on asphalt product/waste as specified).
Mining Waste Type (in Asphalt)Cr (mg/L)Cd (mg/L)Pb (mg/L)Cu (mg/L)Zn (mg/L)Ba (mg/L)Ni (mg/L)Co (mg/L)Key FindingRef.
Copper Tailings (CT) 0.002NRND0.0010.002NRNDNDUnder Limits[55]
Iron Ore Overburden (IOO)0.150.180.230.780.54NDNRNRUnder Limits[46]
Aluminium Tailing Slurry (ATS)0.261 *NR0.638 *0.297 *1.01 *0.184 *0.175 *NRUnder Limits[62]
EAF Steel Slag and Copper Mine Tailings<0.019<0.402<2.961<0.083NRNR<0.001 (or ND)NRUnder Limits[30]
Iron Ore Tailings (IOT) 0.00228 *0.00027 *0.00020 *0.02677 *0.10579 *0.06161 *NRNRUnder Limits[43]
Copper Tailings Powder (CTP)0.002NR00.0010.002NR00Under Limits[49]
Note: Values marked with an asterisk (*) are for the raw tailing material; ND = Not Detected. NR = Not Reported in the paper.
Table 7. Economic Analysis of Using Mining Wastes in Asphalt Pavements.
Table 7. Economic Analysis of Using Mining Wastes in Asphalt Pavements.
Waste TypeEconomic Aspect(s) InvestigatedMethodologyKey FindingRef.
Iron tailings filler (ITF)Material cost savings, overall economic benefits when replacing limestone filler (LF).Comparative cost analysis for 1 km (2-lane) pavement (material prices, transport, modifier cost).ITF substitution offers substantial economic advantages, with costs decreasing with increased ITF content, even with an SCA modifier.[54]
Copper tailings (CT) (with Carbon Fibre)Material cost savings, CT disposal cost savings.Cost–benefit analysis for 1 km unit road (AC-13, 50% LF replacement by CT).Recycling CT as 50% LF replacement saves 725.84 USD/unit road in material costs and 41.04–134.79 USD/unit road in CT disposal costs.[55]
Copper tailings powder (CTP)Cost–benefit analysis, Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit–Cost Ratio (BCR).CBA for 1 km (2-lane) HMA pavement over 10 years with a 15% discount rate, calculating NPV and BCR.CTP application in asphalt mastic provides lucrative economic profits with BCR > 7.4 and positive NPV.[49]
Iron tailings (ITs) as mineral fillersPrice comparison (ITs vs. Limestone), overall economic effectiveness, land and cost savings in maintenance.Comparative cost figures for materials; estimation of savings for pavement maintenance application of ITs.ITs are approx. 1/4 the price of limestone; their use in pavement maintenance can save 104 CNY/m2 and extend service life.[52]
Iron Tailings Filler (ITF)Cost–benefit assessment (NPV, BCR).CBA for 1 km (4-lane) over a 10-year period.Incorporating ITF at rates of 60% and 80% in asphalt mixtures provides considerable economic efficiency, with positive NPV and BCR > 1.[50]
Aluminium Tailing Slurry (ATS) powderCost–benefit analysis (NPV, BCR).CBA for 1 km (2-lane) HMA pavement over 10 years with a 15% discount rate.Using ATS as an asphalt modifier is profitable (BCR 1.19) and offers considerable economic benefits, mainly from the low ATS cost.[62]
Iron ore overburden (IOO) as aggregates and fillerCost savings, NPV, CBA for local and large-scale applications.CBA for 1 km (2-lane) HMA pavement over a 10-year period, considering material, transport, and IOO storage costs.IOO HMA shows significant economic benefits (10-year NPV saving of >USD 900 million for 1000 km new roads, approximately USD 960,000 saved for a 9.5 km on-site project).[46]
Iron tailings as aggregatesMaterial cost savings, general economic.Price comparison of iron tailings vs. limestone and basalt.Recycling iron tailings offers huge economic benefits as their price is approx. 1/4 of limestone and 1/6 of basalt.[60]
Iron ore tailings (IOT) as mineral fillerMaterial cost savings, Cost–benefit analysis (NPV, BCR).CBA for 1 km (2-lane) asphalt pavement over 10 years with a 15% discount rate.IOT as filler offers considerable economic benefits (BCR > 5, positive NPV) from reduced LF purchase and IOT disposal/transport costs.[43]
Copper tailings (CT) as a fillerMaterial cost savingsComparative material cost analysis for 1 km (2-lane) pavement surface course.Mixes with CT were more economic than conventional stone dust, offering up to 5% cost savings.[38]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iqbal, A.; Mashaan, N.S.; Paraskeva, T. Mining Waste in Asphalt Pavements: A Critical Review of Waste Rock and Tailings Applications. J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9, 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9080402

AMA Style

Iqbal A, Mashaan NS, Paraskeva T. Mining Waste in Asphalt Pavements: A Critical Review of Waste Rock and Tailings Applications. Journal of Composites Science. 2025; 9(8):402. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9080402

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iqbal, Adeel, Nuha S. Mashaan, and Themelina Paraskeva. 2025. "Mining Waste in Asphalt Pavements: A Critical Review of Waste Rock and Tailings Applications" Journal of Composites Science 9, no. 8: 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9080402

APA Style

Iqbal, A., Mashaan, N. S., & Paraskeva, T. (2025). Mining Waste in Asphalt Pavements: A Critical Review of Waste Rock and Tailings Applications. Journal of Composites Science, 9(8), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9080402

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop