Next Article in Journal
Using Digital Surface Models from UAS Imagery of Fire Damaged Sphagnum Peatlands for Monitoring and Hydrological Restoration
Next Article in Special Issue
Rapid Assessment of Ecological Integrity for LTER Wetland Sites by Using UAV Multispectral Mapping
Previous Article in Journal
Multirotor Drone Aerodynamic Interaction Investigation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Drone Monitoring of Breeding Waterbird Populations: The Case of the Glossy Ibis
Article Menu
Issue 4 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Drones 2018, 2(4), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones2040044

Estimating Wildlife Tag Location Errors from a VHF Receiver Mounted on a Drone

1
Département des Sciences du Bois et de la Forêt, Université Laval, 2405 rue de la Terrasse, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
2
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Science and Technology, 801-1550 avenue d’Estimauville, Québec, QC G1J 0C3, Canada
3
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service, 801-1550 avenue d’Estimauville, Québec, QC G1J 0C3, Canada
4
droneMetrics, 7 Tauvette Street, Ottawa, ON K1B 3A1, Canada
5
Defense Research and Development Canada, 3701 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1A 0Z4, Canada
6
Avian Science and Conservation Centre of McGill University, c/o 10980 Dunne Road, North Saanich, BC V8L 5J1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 9 November 2018 / Revised: 3 December 2018 / Accepted: 7 December 2018 / Published: 11 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drones for Biodiversity Conservation and Ecological Monitoring)
  |  
PDF [2192 KB, uploaded 11 December 2018]
  |     |  

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated the high potential of drones as tools to facilitate wildlife radio-tracking in rugged, difficult-to-access terrain. Without estimates of accuracy, however, data obtained from receivers attached to drones will be of limited use. We estimated transmitter location errors from a drone-borne VHF (very high frequency) receiver in a hilly and dense boreal forest in southern Québec, Canada. Transmitters and the drone-borne receiver were part of the Motus radio-tracking system, a collaborative network designed to study animal movements at local to continental scales. We placed five transmitters at fixed locations, 1–2 m above ground, and flew a quadrotor drone over them along linear segments, at distances to transmitters ranging from 20 m to 534 m. Signal strength was highest with transmitters with antennae pointing upwards, and lowest with transmitters with horizontal antennae. Based on drone positions with maximum signal strength, mean location error was 134 m (range 44–278 m, n = 17). Estimating peak signal strength against drone GPS coordinates with quadratic, least-squares regressions led to lower location error (mean = 94 m, range 15–275 m, n = 10) but with frequent loss of data due to statistical estimation problems. We conclude that accuracy in this system was insufficient for high-precision purposes such as finding nests. However, in the absence of a dense array of fixed receivers, the use of drone-borne Motus receivers may be a cost-effective way to augment the quantity and quality of data, relative to deploying personnel in difficult-to-access terrain. View Full-Text
Keywords: radio-tracking; Motus; drone; boreal forest; precision; accuracy; response surface; forêt Montmorency radio-tracking; Motus; drone; boreal forest; precision; accuracy; response surface; forêt Montmorency
Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Desrochers, A.; Tremblay, J.A.; Aubry, Y.; Chabot, D.; Pace, P.; Bird, D.M. Estimating Wildlife Tag Location Errors from a VHF Receiver Mounted on a Drone. Drones 2018, 2, 44.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Drones EISSN 2504-446X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top