Next Article in Journal
A New Integrated Multi-Pathogen In Situ Detection Platform Using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Point-of-Care Platform for Plant Health Assessment: A Microfluidic Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

An Add-On Electronic Device to Upgrade Mechanical Gas Meters into Electronic Ones †

by
Edgar Ripoll-Vercellone
1,2,*,
Vicent Ferrandiz
1 and
Manel Gasulla
2
1
Idneo Technologies, 08100 Mollet del Vallès, Spain
2
e-CAT Group, Department Electronic Eng., Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08860 Castelldefels, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Eurosensors 2018 Conference, Graz, Austria, 9–12 September 2018.
Proceedings 2018, 2(13), 1094; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2131094
Published: 13 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of EUROSENSORS 2018)

Abstract

:
Smart utilities enable more efficient energy consumption and distribution and are the key for smart homes development. We propose an electronic device that will be integrated as an add-on to already installed conventional gas meters as a first stage of smart metering rollout. The electronic device will measure the gas consumption and it will be managed by the user’s or operator’s smartphone via NFC. For the gas flow measurement, the electronic device takes advantage of the rotation of a permanent magnet fixed in an index drum.

1. Introduction

Smart grids have been subject of study with the objective of optimizing the energy production and distribution as well as the management of the end users service, in terms of security, remote operations diagnostics, etc. Furthermore, they allow the consumers to manage their consumption according to the available information since they can read their consumption and prices with more detail [1]. Besides, it generates new business models for the energy providers such as the prepaid service [1,2,3].
Nowadays, most gas meters in Spain are mechanical, which hinders the achievement of smart grids for the gas sector [1]. The meters are periodically read by the user or an operator who takes a picture of the totalizer, which is prone to human mistakes and fraud billing [4]. However, their substitution by electronic gas meters is generally not economically feasible. The alternative solution proposed here is to attach an electronic device to the already installed meter (jointly forming a smart gas meter). The smart meters benefit of the accuracy and the long term stability of the conventional gas meters and the advantages (traceability, security, reliability and easier management) of the electronic upgrade. This solution is carried out within the European project “EnSO” (Energy for Smart Objects) [5].

2. Node Description

The add-on electronic device (node, hereafter) must have a long lifetime, small size and must be low cost [4]. In addition, the main required functionalities of the smart meter are: store gas consumption information in fixed periods (days, weeks, etc.); identify and register alarms (low battery, tampering, detect strong magnetic fields, repeated attempts to establish a communication, etc.); and communicate with smartphones through NFC (the user and operator use a smartphone application to perform the management and reading of the smart meter). Figure 1 shows a detailed block diagram. It consists of four main modules: power management, sensor/actuator, control and communication.
The power management module is designed for powering the node from a primary battery, solar cells or the NFC link. For this first version prototype, only primary batteries are considered, in particular coin cells.
The sensor/actuator module consists of three sensors (gas measurement, magnetic field and tamper detection) and one LED for indication purposes. The sensors are on/off switches. The operating principle of the gas measuring is based on that as the gas flows a transmission gear and a mechanical coupling transfer the reciprocating motion to the mechanical index, which has attached a permanent magnet in the index drum that represents the less significant digit. A reed switch is positioned in the edge of the node and is activated whenever the magnet passes in front of it. The resolution of the mechanical measure is 0.001 m3, whereas the digital measure is 0.01 m3, which corresponds to a complete turn of the index drum. Figure 2a shows the node attached to a mechanical gas meter (Gallus 2000) [6]. On the other hand, a reed switch activates an alarm when a strong magnetic field is attempting to corrupt the gas measurement. Finally, the tamper detection consists of a button that is pressed against the case of the electronic device. If someone breaks the plastic case, the switch will be unpressed, generating an alarm.
The control module includes a STM32L0 series microcontroller, which gathers, stores and processes the information of the sensors and the communication module.
The communication module consists of a NFC transceiver. A smartphone is used to interconnect the smart meters with an Internet of Things platform, which is developed by a third-party company. The smartphone uses an android application for installation, configuration, activation, management and maintenance actions.
Figure 2b presents the printed circuit board (PCB) of the electronic device with a description of its elements. The dimensions of the node are 70 mm × 30 mm (without the solar cell). The estimated unitary cost is from 5€ to 7€ depending on the production volume.

3. Performance/Experimental Results

Performed tests using an emulated gas flow on an ITRON counter (Figure 2a) validated a correct performance of the gas reading process. The magnetic field detection was validated by bringing a magnet closer to the sensor. The tamper detection was tested by opening the plastic case of the electronic device. Besides, extensive tests were also performed for assessing the reading range and reliability of the NFC communication and the operating lifetime of the node.
Regarding the tests of the NFC communication, in order to avoid magnetic interference, a plastic structure was used to hold both the smartphone and the node. The structure was placed on a clear laboratory table (Figure 3). Two smartphones models were used: the Huawei P8 Lite ALE-L21 and the Motorola Moto X Style XT1572. Three versions of the node were tested to evaluate the influence of some metallic parts: (1) the original version (see Figure 2b), (2) the node with the battery holder and all the copper removed from the back of the PCB coil and (3) and the node with the copper removed from the back of the PCB coil and with a ferrite plane between the PCB coil and the battery holder. Version 2 was powered externally.
Table 1 summarizes the maximum range achieved with the different setups measured with a resolution of 0.5 cm. As can be seen in Figure 3a, the battery holder and the copper placed below the PCB coil limit the communication range (version 1). For the Huawei smartphone the range is constrained to 1 cm, whereas without the battery holder and the copper (version 2) a range of 3.5 cm is achieved for both smartphones (Figure 3b). The magnetic field distribution of version 3 is similar to the one of version 2, therefore the same communication range is achieved. As the battery must be within the board, version 2 is not feasible. However, a practical solution for version 1 to increase the communication range is to move the battery holder to a different location. When this is not possible due to size restrictions, a ferrite plane can be added between the metal plane and the PCB coil (version 3) at the expense of a higher cost of the node (about 0.5€ to 0.7€ for high volume production).
For the estimation of the operating lifetime of the node, the current profile of the power supply was measured with an oscilloscope current probe (Labdevice). The internal shunt resistor was replaced by other values (1 Ω and 39 Ω) to obtain a better resolution of the measurements. The idle current was measured with a digital multimeter (34461A, Keysight). Table 2 shows the estimated average current consumption for each task based on the assumption of their periodicity. With a 230 mAh coin cell battery, the lifetime of node is 600 days (about 20 months). This lifetime is insufficient for the application and a thorough analysis and redesign has to be done to extend it to more than four years.

4. Future Work

Work is in progress regarding the design of a new version. The product specifications are redefined on the basis of the input from the developed prototype and previously described. This stage includes a new loop of development and validation solving all problems detected on the first prototype series and adding those new provided requirements. Two main features are going to be improved in the following version of the node. One of the goals is to extend the system autonomy as much as possible. Some hardware and software modifications have been studied in order to reach a lower consumption during the idle mode, which has the highest power consumption contribution (78.88%). It is estimated that the autonomy will be increased to more than four years by reducing the energy consumption in about five times. The second goal is to increase the NFC communication range. As it was mentioned in Section 3, the battery holder and the copper generates considerable limitations for the PCB coil. Since adding a ferrite layer will significantly increase the cost of the product, the battery holder will be moved to a more appropriate location.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by EnSO (Energy for Smart Objects), Grant Agreement No. 692482, Idneo Technologies S.L. and the Secretariat of University and Research of the Ministry of Business and Knowledge of the Government of Catalonia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Sun, Q.; Li, H.; Ma, Z.; Wang, C.; Campillo, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wallin, F.; Guo, J. A Comprehensive Review of Smart Energy Meters in Intelligent Energy Networks. IEEE Internet Things J. 2016, 3, 464–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dong, S.; Duan, S.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Li, G.; Tao, R. MEMS-Based Smart Gas Metering for Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Things J. 2017, 4, 1295–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Deng, R.; Yang, Z.; Chow, M.Y.; Chen, J. A Survey on Demand Response in Smart Grids: Mathematical Models and Approaches. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2015, 11, 570–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cascetta, F.; Vigo, P. The future domestic gas meter: Review of current developments. Measurement 1994, 13, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Energy for Smart Objects (EnSO). Available online: http://enso-ecsel.eu/ (accessed on 2 May 2018).
  6. Itron Gallus 2000 Residential Diaphragm Gas Meter Product Specification. Available online: https://www1.itron.com/local/Poland%20Product%20Portolio/GA-GALLUS-04-EN-02-14.pdf (accessed on 13 June 2018).
Figure 1. Block diagram of the add-on electronic device. It consists of four main modules: power management, sensor/actuator, control and communication.
Figure 1. Block diagram of the add-on electronic device. It consists of four main modules: power management, sensor/actuator, control and communication.
Proceedings 02 01094 g001
Figure 2. (a) Tests carried out in a simulated environment, on an ITRON counter (Gallus 2000) [6]; (b) PCB of the node with a description of its elements.
Figure 2. (a) Tests carried out in a simulated environment, on an ITRON counter (Gallus 2000) [6]; (b) PCB of the node with a description of its elements.
Proceedings 02 01094 g002
Figure 3. Setup for testing the NFC communication range with the Huawei P8 Lite: (a) Version 1 at the limit distance of 1 cm; (b) Version 2 at the limit distance of 3.0 cm.
Figure 3. Setup for testing the NFC communication range with the Huawei P8 Lite: (a) Version 1 at the limit distance of 1 cm; (b) Version 2 at the limit distance of 3.0 cm.
Proceedings 02 01094 g003
Table 1. Maximum Range. The ruler used for measure the distance has a resolution of 0.5 cm.
Table 1. Maximum Range. The ruler used for measure the distance has a resolution of 0.5 cm.
SmartphoneVersion 1Version 2Version 3
Huawei P8 Lite1.0 cm3.0 cm3.0 cm
Motorola Moto X Style2.0 cm3.5 cm3.5 cm
Table 2. Average current consumption detailed by each task performed. A 3V coin cell battery powers the node. It is assumed that an NFC communication will take place every five days and one pulse detection will happen every 30 s.
Table 2. Average current consumption detailed by each task performed. A 3V coin cell battery powers the node. It is assumed that an NFC communication will take place every five days and one pulse detection will happen every 30 s.
TaskAverage Current [uA]Consumption Percentage
Energy ConsumptionIdle mode12.6078.88%
Pulse detection3.220.03%
NFC communication0.161.00%
Rest0.0130.08%
AutonomyBattery 230 mAh600Days
1.64Years
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ripoll-Vercellone, E.; Ferrandiz, V.; Gasulla, M. An Add-On Electronic Device to Upgrade Mechanical Gas Meters into Electronic Ones. Proceedings 2018, 2, 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2131094

AMA Style

Ripoll-Vercellone E, Ferrandiz V, Gasulla M. An Add-On Electronic Device to Upgrade Mechanical Gas Meters into Electronic Ones. Proceedings. 2018; 2(13):1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2131094

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ripoll-Vercellone, Edgar, Vicent Ferrandiz, and Manel Gasulla. 2018. "An Add-On Electronic Device to Upgrade Mechanical Gas Meters into Electronic Ones" Proceedings 2, no. 13: 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2131094

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop