Large Model in Low-Altitude Economy: Applications and Challenges
Abstract
1. Introduction
- It articulates the SILAS as a unified, cross-layer architecture tailored to the low-altitude economy and clarifies the scope and interfaces of its four networks.
- It presents a cross-layer meta-survey of large foundation models across all SILAS layers and presents a service-oriented taxonomy with consolidated evidence tables.
- It synthesizes the enabling technology stack and deployment patterns for providing actionable design guidelines and cooperation between models and networks in the SILAS.
- It discusses emerging trends, such as advanced multimodal fusion and trustworthy distributed intelligence, to guide future research and industrial implementations.
2. Large Model for SILAS
2.1. The SILAS Architecture: A Dedicated Overview
2.1.1. Facility Network: The Physical and Data Backbone
2.1.2. Information Network: The Dynamic Sensing and Communication Layer
2.1.3. Air Route Network: The Structured Traffic Management Layer
2.1.4. Service Network: The Application and Business Logic Layer
2.2. Motivation for Integrating Large Models into SILAS
3. Large Model for the Facility Network
3.1. Large Model for the Remote Sensing Dataset Construction
3.2. Large Model for Perception and Interaction
3.3. Large Models for the Meteorological Field
3.4. Large Model for Image Restoration Technologies
4. Large Models for the Information Network
4.1. Large Models in Localization
4.2. Large Models in Sensing
4.3. Large Models in Communication
4.4. Platform Design and Experiments
5. Large Models for the Air Route Network
5.1. Large Models for Embodied Intelligence
5.2. Large-Model-Based Vision Transformer
5.3. Large Models for Path Planning
6. Large Models for the Service Network
6.1. Toward a Service-Oriented Taxonomy: Organizing Large Model Interactions in SILAS
6.2. Intelligent Perception Service Large Models
6.3. Unified Representation of Large Models
6.4. Inherent Generalization in Large Models
6.5. Multi-Agent Large Models
7. Discussion and Future Directions
7.1. Actionable Design Guidelines for SILAS Integration
7.2. Core Challenges for Applying LLMs to SILAS
7.2.1. Sustainable Operation Under Severe Resource Constraints
7.2.2. Data Security and Privacy Preservation
7.2.3. Network Security and System Resilience
7.2.4. Standardization and Interoperability for Cross-Domain Integration
7.3. Proposed Research Roadmap to Investigable Applications
7.3.1. Specialized and Robust Models for Low-Altitude Domains
7.3.2. High-Efficiency, Low-Cost Training and Deployment
7.3.3. Advanced Multi-Modal Fusion for Active Perception
7.3.4. Distributed, Trustworthy and Secure Intelligence
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| UAVs | Unmanned Aerial Vehicles |
| eVTOL | Electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing |
| LAVs | Low-Altitude Vehicles |
| SILAS | Smart Integrated Lower Airspace System |
| BSs | Base Stations |
| IoT | Internet of Things |
| 5G | Fifth-Generation Mobile Network |
| 6G | Sixth-Generation Mobile Network |
| UTM | Unmanned Aircraft System Traffic Management |
| UAM | Urban Air Mobility |
| 3D | Three-Dimensional |
| AI | Artificial Intelligence |
| 3GPP | 3rd Generation Partnership Project |
| NTN | Non-Terrestrial Network |
| LEO | Low Earth Orbit |
| RGB | Red–Green–Blue |
| SAR | Synthetic Aperture Radar |
| ISAC | Integrated Sensing and Communication |
| EC | Edge Computing |
| UE | User Equipment |
| SAGIN | Space–Air–Ground Integrated Network |
| QoS | Quality of Service |
| GPS | Global Positioning System |
| GNSS | Global Navigation Satellite System |
| RTK | Real-Time Kinematic |
| IMUs | Inertial Measurement Units |
| SLAM | Simultaneous Localization and Mapping |
| VO | Visual Odometry |
| VLM | Vision Language Model |
| SPOT | Sparse Position and Outline Tracking |
| MMLM | Meteorological Multimodal Large Model |
| Intra-PT | Intra-Patch Transformer |
| CLIP | Contrastive Language–Image Pre-training |
| CLIP-SRD | CLIP Soft Residual Distillation |
| CWP | CLIP Weather Prior |
| MLLM | Multi-Modal Large Language Model |
| UGSAM | Urban Green Space SAM |
| YOLO | You Only Look Once |
| DeepSORT | Simple Online and Realtime Tracking |
| EKF | Extended Kalman Filter |
| DNN | Deep Neural Network |
| RF | Radio Frequency |
| LC | Least Context |
| RIS | Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface |
| MIMO | Multiple Input, Multiple Output |
| ISCC | Integrated Sensing Communication and Computing |
| GAI | Generative AI |
| wBAIM | Wireless Big AI Model |
| GAIL | Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning |
| FANETs | Flying Ad Hoc Networks |
| free5GC | Free 5G Core |
| RL | Reinforcement Learning |
| GAN | Generative Adversarial Network |
| Play-LMP | Play-Supervised Latent Motor Plans |
| LangLfP | Language-Conditioned Learning from Play |
| ELLM | Exploring with Large Language Model |
| SayCan | Do As I Can, Not As I Say |
| ROSchain | Robot Operating System Chain |
| CLS | Classification Token |
| MAGE | Masked Generative Encoder |
| VQGAN | Vector-Quantized Generative Adversarial Network |
| DETR | DEtection TRansformer |
| iBOT | Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizer |
| SwAV | Swapping Assignments Between Views |
| ViT-g | Vision Transformer—Giant |
| CNN | Convolutional Neural Network |
| API | Application Programming Interface |
| Qwen2-72B | Qwen2 Family, 72-Billion-Parameter Model |
| CapFilt | Caption Filtering Strategy |
| OCR | Optical Character Recognition |
| HYDRA | Hyper Agent for Dynamic Compositional Visual Reasoning |
| FFN | Feed-Forward Neural Network |
| DRL | Deep Reinforcement Learning |
| SHAP | SHapley Additive exPlanations |
| LIME | Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations |
| MEC | Multi-Access Edge Computing |
References
- Li, Z.; Gao, Z.; Wang, K.; Mei, Y.; Zhu, C.; Chen, L.; Wu, X.; Niyato, D. Unauthorized UAV Countermeasure for Low-Altitude Economy: Joint Communications and Jamming Based on MIMO Cellular Systems. IEEE Internet Things J. 2025, 12, 6659–6672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garrow, L.A.; German, B.J.; Leonard, C.E. Urban air mobility: A comprehensive review and comparative analysis with autonomous and electric ground transportation for informing future research. Transp. Res. Part Emerg. Technol. 2021, 132, 103377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, N.; Wu, S.; Wang, X.; Yin, Z.; Li, C.; Chen, W.; Chen, F. AI for UAV-Assisted IoT Applications: A Comprehensive Review. IEEE Internet Things J. 2023, 10, 14438–14461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Q.H.; Dong, C.; Jia, Z.Y.; Cui, C.; Feng, S.M.; Zhou, F.H.; Xie, H. Low-Altitude Intelligent Network Networking and Control Theories and Methods (in Chinese). Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin. 2024, 45, 28809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solomon, Y. With 1 Announcement, the FAA Just Created an $82 Billion Market and 100,000 New Jobs, 2016. Available online: https://www.inc.com/yoram-solomon/with-one-rule-the-faa-just-created-an-82-billion-market-and-100000-new-jobs.html (accessed on 12 October 2025).
- Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Traffic Management (UTM) Concept of Operations v2.0; Technical Report; U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2020.
- Lieb, J.; Volkert, A. Unmanned Aircraft Systems Traffic Management: A comparsion on the FAA UTM and the European CORUS ConOps based on U-space. In Proceedings of the 2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), Virtual, 11–15 October 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Yu, C.; Wu, T.; Lin, B.; Ma, L.; Li, Y.; Chen, M.; Shi, J. (Eds.) Low-Altitude Economy Scenario White Paper (English Edition); White Paper; Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CSAA): Beijing, China, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Baum, M.S. Unmanned Aircraft Systems Traffic Management: UTM, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SESAR Joint Undertaking (SJU). SESAR Master Plan 2025: Accelerating the Digital European Sky; Technical Report; SESAR Joint Undertaking: Brussels, Belgium, 2025; Strategic roadmap for the digital transformation of European air traffic management under the Single European Sky initiative. [Google Scholar]
- SESAR Joint Undertaking (SJU). Proposal for the Future Architecture of the European Airspace; Final Report, SESAR Joint Undertaking; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2019; Developed under the Delegation Agreement MOVE/E3/DA/2017-477/SI2.766828 between the European Commission and the SESAR Joint Undertaking. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). 3GPP TS 38.211: NR; Physical Channels and Modulation (Release 18). Technical Report 38.211, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). 2025. Available online: https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=3231 (accessed on 12 October 2025).
- Giordani, M.; Zorzi, M. Non-Terrestrial Networks in the 6G Era: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Netw. 2021, 35, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Telecommunication Union (ITU). ITU-R M.2171: Characteristics of Terrestrial IMT-Advanced Systems for Frequency Sharing/Interference Analyses. Technical Report M.2171, International Telecommunication Union, Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R). 2009. Available online: https://www.itu.int/pub/R-REP-M.2171 (accessed on 12 October 2025).
- Xu, C.; Liao, X.; Yang, F. IEEE Standard Pioneered an IT-Led Interdisciplinary Approach to Structure Low-Altitude Airspace for UAV Operations. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2022, 65, 207201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Cui, Y.; Masouros, C.; Xu, J.; Han, T.X.; Eldar, Y.C.; Buzzi, S. Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward Dual-Functional Wireless Networks for 6G and Beyond. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2022, 40, 1728–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Y.; Ye, Z.; Wu, M.; Li, H.; Xiao, M.; Alouini, M.S.; Al-Hourani, A.; Cioni, S. Space-Air-Ground Integrated Wireless Networks for 6G: Basics, Key Technologies, and Future Trends. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2024, 42, 3327–3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, H.; Zhang, J.; Geng, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Sun, T.; Zhang, N.; Liu, J.; Wu, Q.; Cao, X. Space-air-ground integrated network (SAGIN) for 6G: Requirements, architecture and challenges. China Commun. 2022, 19, 90–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, K.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, C.X.; Ye, X.; Gomez-Ponce, J.; Cai, X.; Miao, Y.; Cui, Z.; Wu, Q.; Fan, W. A Survey on Channel Sounding Technologies and Measurements for UAV-Assisted Communications. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2024, 73, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Z.; Luo, C.; Min, G.; Wu, J.; Luo, C.; Pu, J.; Li, S. A Survey on Autonomous and Intelligent Swarms of Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2025, 26, 14477–14500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shukla, P.; Shukla, S.; Kumar Singh, A. Trajectory-Prediction Techniques for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2025, 27, 1867–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, M.; Soofi, A.A.; Khan, F.; Raza, S.; Khan, W.U.; Su, L.; Xu, F.; Han, Z. Toward a Sustainable Low-Altitude Economy: A Survey of Energy-Efficient RIS-UAV Networks. IEEE Internet Things J. 2025, 12, 51951–51975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sallouha, H.; Saleh, S.; De Bast, S.; Cui, Z.; Pollin, S.; Wymeersch, H. On the Ground and in the Sky: A Tutorial on Radio Localization in Ground-Air-Space Networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2025, 27, 218–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamissi, A.; Dhraief, A. A Survey on the Unmanned Aircraft System Traffic Management. ACM Comput. Surv. 2023, 56, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauranov, A.; Rakas, J. Designing airspace for urban air mobility: A review of concepts and approaches. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2021, 125, 100726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IDEA Research Institute. Low-Altitude Economy Development White Paper (2.0)—Full Digitalization Scheme. 2023. Available online: https://www.idea.edu.cn/news/7638.html (accessed on 12 October 2025).
- He, D.; Yuan, W.; Wu, J.; Liu, R. Ubiquitous UAV Communication Enabled Low-Altitude Economy: Applications, Techniques, and 3GPP’s Efforts. IEEE Netw. 2025, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brohan, A.; Brown, N.; Carbajal, J.; Chebotar, Y.; Chen, X.; Choromanski, K.; Ding, T.; Driess, D.; Dubey, A.; Finn, C.; et al. RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2307.15818. [Google Scholar]
- Tao, L.; Zhang, H.; Jing, H.; Liu, Y.; Yan, D.; Wei, G.; Xue, X. Advancements in Vision–Language Models for Remote Sensing: Datasets, Capabilities, and Enhancement Techniques. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, X.; He, Z.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, Z.H.; Yang, M.; Zhao, J. An Overview of Large AI Models and Their Applications. Vis. Intell. 2024, 2, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Chen, S.; Jiang, L.; Pan, S.; Cai, R.; Yang, S.; Yang, F. Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning in Large Language Models: A Survey of Methodologies. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2025, 58, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lan, L.; Wang, F.; Zheng, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, X. Efficient Prompt Tuning of Large Vision-Language Model for Fine-Grained Ship Classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2025, 63, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, K.; Ramrakhya, R.; Ramakrishnan, S.K.; Gervet, T.; Turner, J.; Gokaslan, A.; Maestre, N.; Chang, A.X.; Batra, D.; Savva, M.; et al. Habitat-Matterport 3D Semantics Dataset. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2210.05633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Sun, G.; Sun, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Zhao, C.; Wu, J.; Liang, S.; Yin, M.; Wang, P.; et al. Toward Realization of Low-Altitude Economy Networks: Core Architecture, Integrated Technologies, and Future Directions. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw. 2025, 11, 2788–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Chen, D.; Guan, Z.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, J.; Ye, Q.; Fu, L.; Zhou, J. RemoteCLIP: A Vision Language Foundation Model for Remote Sensing. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2024, 62, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Zhao, T.; Guo, Y.; Yin, J. RS5M and GeoRSCLIP: A Large-Scale Vision- Language Dataset and a Large Vision-Language Model for Remote Sensing. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2024, 62, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Chen, K.; Zhao, R.; Zou, Z.; Shi, Z. Text2Earth: Unlocking text-driven remote sensing image generation with a global-scale dataset and a foundation model. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 2025, 13, 238–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, Z.; Wang, Y.; Yu, W.; Stewart, A.J.; Zhao, J.; Lehmann, N.; Dujardin, T.; Yuan, Z.; Ghamisi, P.; Zhu, X.X. DOFA-CLIP: Multimodal Vision-Language Foundation Models for Earth Observation. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.06312. [Google Scholar]
- Du, S.; Tang, S.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Guo, R. Tree-GPT: Modular Large Language Model Expert System for Forest Remote Sensing Image Understanding and Interactive Analysis. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2310.04698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, C.; Song, N.; Nie, J.; Ye, M.; Liang, X.; Liu, X.; Ma, J. MS-LIP: Multiscale Semantic Information Integration With Large Language Models for Marine Prediction. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2025, 63, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Shen, H.; Zhao, T.; Chen, B.; Guan, Z.; Wang, Y.; Jia, X.; Cai, Y.; Shang, Y.; Yin, J. GeoRSMLLM: A Multimodal Large Language Model for Vision-Language Tasks in Geoscience and Remote Sensing. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.12490. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, W.; Cai, M.; Zhang, T.; Zhuang, Y.; Mao, X. EarthGPT: A Universal Multimodal Large Language Model for Multisensor Image Comprehension in Remote Sensing Domain. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2024, 62, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, K.; Xu, N.; Yang, R.; Xu, Y.; Gao, Z.; Kitrungrotsakul, T.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, P.; Wang, J.; Wei, N.; et al. Falcon: A Remote Sensing Vision-Language Foundation Model. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.11070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shabbir, A.; Zumri, M.; Bennamoun, M.; Khan, F.S.; Khan, S. GeoPixel: Pixel Grounding Large Multimodal Model in Remote Sensing. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2501.13925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Cai, M.; Zhang, T.; Li, J.; Zhuang, Y.; Mao, X. EarthMarker: A Visual Prompting Multi-modal Large Language Model for Remote Sensing. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2407.13596. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, H.; Su, X.; Wu, C.; Du, B.; Zhang, L.; Li, D. Remote Sensing ChatGPT: Solving Remote Sensing Tasks with ChatGPT and Visual Models. In Proceedings of the IGARSS 2024—2024 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Athens, Greece, 7–12 July 2024; pp. 11474–11478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, W.; Yu, Z.; Mu, B.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, G.; Peng, M. RS-Agent: Automating Remote Sensing Tasks through Intelligent Agent. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2406.07089. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, C.; Chen, K.; Zhang, H.; Qi, Z.; Zou, Z.; Shi, Z. Change-Agent: Toward Interactive Comprehensive Remote Sensing Change Interpretation and Analysis. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2024, 62, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, J.; Mi, X.; Chen, W.; Chen, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Awange, J.L.; Soja, B.; Bai, L.; Deng, Y.; et al. Forecasting of Tropospheric Delay Using AI Foundation Models in Support of Microwave Remote Sensing. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2024, 62, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Yang, W.; Zhang, P.; Xiao, X.; Cao, D.; Qin, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Bogdan, P. ClimateLLM: Efficient Weather Forecasting via Frequency-Aware Large Language Models. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2502.11059. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, C.; Chen, Z.; Minhas, F. Physics-Informed Learning for Tropical Cyclone Intensity Prediction. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2024, 62, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, R.; Tan, R.T.; Cheong, L.F. All in One Bad Weather Removal Using Architectural Search. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA, 13–19 June 2020; pp. 3172–3182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zafarmomen, N.; Samadi, V. Can large language models effectively reason about adverse weather conditions? Environ. Model. Softw. 2025, 188, 106421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Long, G.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, C. Personalized Adapter for Large Meteorology Model on Devices: Towards Weather Foundation Models. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2405.20348. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.; Zhou, P.; Hua, Y.; Chong, D.; Cao, M.; Li, Y.; Chen, W.; Zhu, B.; Liang, J.; Yuan, Z. ClimateIQA: A New Dataset and Benchmark to Advance Vision-Language Models in Meteorology Anomalies Analysis. In Proceedings of the KDD ’25: 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2, New York, NY, USA, 3–7 August 2025; pp. 5322–5333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, S.; Xu, J.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Jin, Q.; Shen, L.; Liu, C.; Xiang, S. MeteorPred: A Meteorological Multimodal Large Model and Dataset for Severe Weather Event Prediction. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2508.06859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jose Valanarasu, J.M.; Yasarla, R.; Patel, V.M. TransWeather: Transformer-based Restoration of Images Degraded by Adverse Weather Conditions. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA, 18–24 June 2022; pp. 2343–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.T.; Huang, Z.K.; Tsai, C.C.; Yang, H.H.; Ding, J.J.; Kuo, S.Y. Learning Multiple Adverse Weather Removal via Two-stage Knowledge Learning and Multi-contrastive Regularization: Toward a Unified Model. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA, 19–24 June 2022; pp. 17632–17641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Z.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Q.; Chu, Q.; Lu, L.; Ye, J.; Yu, N. Exploring the Application of Large-Scale Pre-Trained Models on Adverse Weather Removal. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2024, 33, 1683–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mi, W.; Chen, H.; Liu, W. Hierarchical Interpretable Vision Reasoning Driven Through a Multi-Modal Large Language Model for Depth Estimation. In Proceedings of the 2024 China Automation Congress (CAC), Qingdao, China, 2–3 November 2024; pp. 829–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Yang, S.; Long, C.; Yuan, J.; Yang, Q.; Fan, J.; Meng, B.; Chen, Z.; Xu, F.; Mou, C. Urban Greening Analysis: A Multimodal Large Language Model for Pinpointing Vegetation Areas in Adverse Weather Conditions. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mozaffari, M.; Lin, X.; Hayes, S. Toward 6G with Connected Sky: UAVs and Beyond. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2021, 59, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Telecommunication Union. Framework and Overall Objectives of the Future Development of IMT for 2030 and Beyond; Recommendation itu-r m.2160-0; International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R): Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. Available online: https://www.itu.int/pub/R-REC-M.2160 (accessed on 12 October 2025).
- Kuckreja, K.; Danish, M.S.; Naseer, M.; Das, A.; Khan, S.; Khan, F.S. GeoChat:Grounded Large Vision-Language Model for Remote Sensing. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA, 16–22 June 2024; pp. 27831–27840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koubaa, A.; Ammar, A.; Abdelkader, M.; Alhabashi, Y.; Ghouti, L. AERO: AI-Enabled Remote Sensing Observation with Onboard Edge Computing in UAVs. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.Y.; Bochkovskiy, A.; Liao, H.Y.M. YOLOv7: Trainable Bag-of-Freebies Sets New State-of-the-Art for Real-Time Object Detectors. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 18–22 June 2023; pp. 7464–7475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, B.; Cao, X.; Xiong, K.; Yuen, C.; Guan, Y.L.; Leng, S.; Qian, L.; Han, Z. Edge Intelligence for Autonomous Driving in 6G Wireless System: Design Challenges and Solutions. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2021, 28, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, G.; Xie, W.; Niyato, D.; Du, H.; Kang, J.; Wu, J.; Sun, S.; Zhang, P. Generative AI for Advanced UAV Networking. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2404.10556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odat, E.; Ghazzai, H.; Alsharoa, A. A WaveGAN Approach for mmWave-Based FANET Topology Optimization. Sensors 2024, 24, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Zhang, H.; Song, L. Beyond D2D: Full Dimension UAV-to-Everything Communications in 6G. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2020, 69, 6592–6602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rashid, M.T.; Zhang, D.Y.; Wang, D. SocialDrone: An Integrated Social Media and Drone Sensing System for Reliable Disaster Response. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2020—IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, Virtual, 6–9 July 2020; pp. 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Chen, Y.; Jin, H.; Chen, L.; Liu, Z.; Sun, H.; Hong, J.; Wang, H.; Fang, S.; Zhang, X. 3D Model Construction and Ecological Environment Investigation on a Regional Scale Using UAV Remote Sensing. Intell. Autom. Soft Comput. 2023, 37, 1655–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdalla, A.S.; Powell, K.; Marojevic, V.; Geraci, G. UAV-Assisted Attack Prevention, Detection, and Recovery of 5G Networks. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2020, 27, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McEnroe, P.; Wang, S.; Liyanage, M. A Survey on the Convergence of Edge Computing and AI for UAVs: Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 15435–15459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, M.; Niyato, D.; Zhang, H.; Kang, J.; Xiong, Z.; Mao, S.; Han, Z. Sparks of Generative Pretrained Transformers in Edge Intelligence for the Metaverse: Caching and Inference for Mobile Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content Services. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2023, 18, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baltrušaitis, T.; Ahuja, C.; Morency, L.P. Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomy. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019, 41, 423–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Team, G.; Anil, R.; Borgeaud, S.; Alayrac, J.B.; Yu, J.; Soricut, R.; Schalkwyk, J.; Dai, A.M.; Hauth, A.; Millican, K.; et al. Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2312.11805. [Google Scholar]
- Geraci, G.; Garcia-Rodriguez, A.; Azari, M.M.; Lozano, A.; Mezzavilla, M.; Chatzinotas, S.; Chen, Y.; Rangan, S.; Renzo, M.D. What Will the Future of UAV Cellular Communications Be? A Flight From 5G to 6G. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2022, 24, 1304–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Q.; Fei, Z.; Li, B.; Han, Z. Computation Offloading in LEO Satellite Networks With Hybrid Cloud and Edge Computing. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 9164–9176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajatheva, N.; Atzeni, I.; Bjornson, E.; Bourdoux, A.; Buzzi, S.; Dore, J.B.; Erkucuk, S.; Fuentes, M.; Guan, K.; Hu, Y.; et al. White Paper on Broadband Connectivity in 6G. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2004.14247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Du, H.; Niyato, D.; Kang, J.; Cui, S.; Shen, X.; Zhang, P. Generative AI for Integrated Sensing and Communication: Insights From the Physical Layer Perspective. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2024, 31, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, G.; He, L.; Sun, Z.; Wu, Q.; Liang, S.; Li, J.; Niyato, D.; Leung, V.C.M. Joint Task Offloading and Resource Allocation in Aerial-Terrestrial UAV Networks With Edge and Fog Computing for Post-Disaster Rescue. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024, 23, 8582–8600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, B.; Cao, X.; Yuen, C.; Qian, L. Offloading Optimization in Edge Computing for Deep Learning Enabled Target Tracking by Internet-of-UAVs. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2008.08001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Z. Big AI Models for 6G Wireless Networks: Opportunities, Challenges, and Research Directions. Wirel. Commun. 2024, 31, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Wang, Q.; Xu, Y. AR-GAIL: Adaptive routing protocol for FANETs using generative adversarial imitation learning. Comput. Netw. 2022, 218, 109382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, W.; Rangan, S.; Mezzavilla, M.; Lozano, A.; Geraci, G.; Semkin, V.; Loianno, G. Generative Neural Network Channel Modeling for Millimeter-Wave UAV Communication. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2022, 21, 9417–9431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Xu, M.; Zhang, X.; Niyato, D.; Xiong, Z.; Wang, S.; Huang, T. AI-Generated Network Design: A Diffusion Model-Based Learning Approach. IEEE Netw. 2024, 38, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Liu, Q.; Chen, K.; Di, B.; Zhang, H.; Yang, W.; Niyato, D.; Han, Z.; Vincent Poor, H. Large Models for Aerial Edges: An Edge-Cloud Model Evolution and Communication Paradigm. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2025, 43, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Nie, J.; Huang, Y.; Xie, G.; Xiong, Z.; Liu, J.; Niyato, D.; Shen, X. Beyond the Cloud: Edge Inference for Generative Large Language Models in Wireless Networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2025, 24, 643–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lins, S.; Cardoso, K.V.; Both, C.B.; Mendes, L.; De Rezende, J.F.; Silveira, A.; Linder, N.; Klautau, A. Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Mobility and 5G Connectivity in UAV-Based Critical Missions. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 111792–111801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, W.; Ma, S.; Duan, L.; Tian, Y.; Xing, P.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Jia, H.; Huang, T. Digital Retina: A Way to Make the City Brain More Efficient by Visual Coding. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 2021, 31, 4147–4161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Saad, W.; Bennis, M.; Lu, X.; Debbah, M.; Zuo, W. Predictive Deployment of UAV Base Stations in Wireless Networks: Machine Learning Meets Contract Theory. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2021, 20, 637–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, G.; Li, J.; Wang, A.; Wu, Q.; Sun, Z.; Liu, Y. Secure and Energy-Efficient UAV Relay Communications Exploiting Collaborative Beamforming. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2022, 70, 5401–5416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Zhan, C.; Cui, Y.; Wu, C.; Hu, H. Robust Edge Computing in UAV Systems via Scalable Computing and Cooperative Computing. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2021, 28, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lynch, C.; Khansari, M.; Xiao, T.; Kumar, V.; Tompson, J.; Levine, S.; Sermanet, P. Learning Latent Plans from Play. In Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning, Osaka, Japan, 30 October–1 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Lynch, C.; Sermanet, P. Language Conditioned Imitation Learning over Unstructured Data. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2005.07648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palo, N.D.; Byravan, A.; Hasenclever, L.; Wulfmeier, M.; Heess, N.; Riedmiller, M. Towards A Unified Agent with Foundation Models. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2307.09668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Y.; Watkins, O.; Wang, Z.; Colas, C.; Darrell, T.; Abbeel, P.; Gupta, A.; Andreas, J. Guiding Pretraining in Reinforcement Learning with Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Honolulu, HI, USA, 23–29 July 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Ahn, M.; Brohan, A.; Brown, N.; Chebotar, Y.; Cortes, O.; David, B.; Finn, C.; Gopalakrishnan, K.; Hausman, K.; Herzog, A.; et al. Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances. In Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning, Auckland, New Zealand, 14–18 December 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, W.; Wang, C.; Zhang, R.; Li, Y.; Wu, J.; Fei-Fei, L. VoxPoser: Composable 3D Value Maps for Robotic Manipulation with Language Models. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2307.05973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Pan, F.; Ping, H.; Zhou, Y. Agent as Cerebrum, Controller as Cerebellum: Implementing an Embodied LMM-based Agent on Drones. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2311.15033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Firoozi, R.; Tucker, J.; Tian, S.; Majumdar, A.; Sun, J.; Liu, W.; Zhu, Y.; Song, S.; Kapoor, A.; Hausman, K.; et al. Foundation models in robotics: Applications, challenges, and the future. Int. J. Robot. Res. 2025, 44, 701–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Shi, E.; Hu, H.; Ma, C.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Yao, Y.; Liu, X.; Ge, B.; Zhang, S. Large language models for robotics: Opportunities, challenges, and perspectives. J. Autom. Intell. 2025, 4, 52–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dosovitskiy, A.; Beyer, L.; Kolesnikov, A.; Weissenborn, D.; Zhai, X.; Unterthiner, T.; Dehghani, M.; Minderer, M.; Heigold, G.; Gelly, S.; et al. An Image is Worth 16 × 16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. arXiv 2020, arXiv:abs. [Google Scholar]
- He, K.; Chen, X.; Xie, S.; Li, Y.; Dollár, P.; Girshick, R. Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA, 18–24 June 2022; pp. 15979–15988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, T.; Chang, H.; Mishra, S.K.; Zhang, H.; Katabi, D.; Krishnan, D. MAGE: MAsked Generative Encoder to Unify Representation Learning and Image Synthesis. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 18–22 June 2023; pp. 2142–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X.; Su, W.; Lu, L.; Li, B.; Wang, X.; Dai, J. Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detection. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2010.04159. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.; Li, F.; Liu, S.; Zhang, L.; Su, H.; Zhu, J.; Ni, L.M.; Shum, H.Y. DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detection. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2203.03605. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, Y.; Li, L.; Xu, Y.; Li, X.; Yang, Z.; Wang, W.; Yang, Y. Segment and Track Anything. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2305.06558. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, X.; Liu, M.; Zeng, D.; Ye, H.; Li, S. Learning Occlusion-Robust Vision Transformers for Real-Time UAV Tracking. In Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Nashville, TN, USA, 11–15 June 2025; pp. 17103–17113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Wang, X.; Zeng, D.; Ye, H.; Xie, X.; Zhao, Q.; Li, S. Learning motion blur robust vision transformers for real-time UAV tracking. Expert Syst. Appl. 2026, 297, 129445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Liu, M.; Wu, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, X.; Li, S. Learning adaptive and view-invariant vision transformer for real-time UAV tracking. In Proceedings of the ICML’24: 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, Vienna, Austria, 21–27 July 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Oquab, M.; Darcet, T.; Moutakanni, T.; Vo, H.; Szafraniec, M.; Khalidov, V.; Fernandez, P.; Haziza, D.; Massa, F.; El-Nouby, A.; et al. DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2304.07193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, Z.; Song, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, L. VideoMAE: Masked autoencoders are data-efficient learners for self-supervised video pre-training. In Proceedings of the NIPS ’22: 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Red Hook, NY, USA, 28 November–9 December 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, L.; Huang, B.; Zhao, Z.; Tong, Z.; He, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Qiao, Y. VideoMAE V2: Scaling Video Masked Autoencoders with Dual Masking. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2303.16727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, J.; Liu, G.; Wang, H.; Yu, Y.; Yang, J. TPML: Task Planning for Multi-UAV System with Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 18th International Conference on Control & Automation (ICCA), Reykjavík, Iceland, 18–21 June 2024; pp. 886–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, J.; Huang, W.; Xia, F.; Xu, P.; Hausman, K.; Ichter, B.; Florence, P.; Zeng, A. Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Control. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), London, UK, 29 May–2 June 2023; pp. 9493–9500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, W.; Abbeel, P.; Pathak, D.; Mordatch, I. Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agents. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2201.07207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, Y.; Zhang, X.; Paxton, C.; Zhang, S. Task and Motion Planning with Large Language Models for Object Rearrangement. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Detroit, MI, USA, 1–5 October 2023; pp. 2086–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiao, A.; Patel, T.P.; Khurana, S.; Korol, A.M.; Brunke, L.; Adajania, V.K.; Culha, U.; Zhou, S.; Schoellig, A.P. Swarm-GPT: Combining Large Language Models with Safe Motion Planning for Robot Choreography Design. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2312.01059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vemprala, S.H.; Bonatti, R.; Bucker, A.; Kapoor, A. ChatGPT for Robotics: Design Principles and Model Abilities. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 55682–55696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radford, A.; Kim, J.W.; Hallacy, C.; Ramesh, A.; Goh, G.; Agarwal, S.; Sastry, G.; Askell, A.; Mishkin, P.; Clark, J.; et al. Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2103.00020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, C.; Yang, Y.; Xia, Y.; Chen, Y.T.; Parekh, Z.; Pham, H.; Le, Q.V.; Sung, Y.; Li, Z.; Duerig, T. Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervision. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2102.05918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, L.; Krishnan, D.; Isola, P.; Katabi, D.; Tian, Y. Improving CLIP Training with Language Rewrites. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2305.20088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.H.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, H.; Yang, J.; Li, C.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, L.; Yuan, L.; Zhang, L.; Hwang, J.N.; et al. Grounded Language-Image Pre-training. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA, 18–24 June 2022; pp. 10955–10965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Z.; Xie, F.; Ji, T. Patrol Agent: An Autonomous UAV Framework for Urban Patrol Using on Board Vision Language Model and on Cloud Large Language Model. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Robotics and Computer Vision (ICRCV), Wuxi, China, 20–22 September 2024; pp. 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Li, D.; Xiong, C.; Hoi, S. BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2201.12086. [Google Scholar]
- Bai, J.; Bai, S.; Yang, S.; Wang, S.; Tan, S.; Wang, P.; Lin, J.; Zhou, C.; Zhou, J. Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2308.12966. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhong, Z.; Chen, Y.; Chu, R.; Liu, S.; Jia, J. Mini-Gemini: Mining the Potential of Multi-modality Vision Language Models. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2403.18814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.; Chen, H.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, Z.; He, H.; Yue, X.; Jiang, L. Vision as a Dialect: Unifying Visual Understanding and Generation via Text-Aligned Representations. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2506.18898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Team, C. Chameleon: Mixed-Modal Early-Fusion Foundation Models. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2405.09818. [Google Scholar]
- Li, T.; Lu, Q.; Zhao, L.; Li, H.; Zhu, X.; Qiao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Shao, W. UniFork: Exploring Modality Alignment for Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2506.17202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.; Wang, Y.; Song, Z.; Li, Y.; Sun, H.; Chen, W.; Zhou, Z.; Xu, J.; Wang, J.; Yu, K. DualToken: Towards Unifying Visual Understanding and Generation with Dual Visual Vocabularies. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.14324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Jia, J. LLaMA-VID: An Image is Worth 2 Tokens in Large Language Models. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2311.17043. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.; Yu, S.; Stengel-Eskin, E.; Yoon, J.; Cheng, F.; Bertasius, G.; Bansal, M. VideoTree: Adaptive Tree-based Video Representation for LLM Reasoning on Long Videos. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2405.19209. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, G.; Jin, P.; Wu, Z.; Li, H.; Song, Y.; Sun, L.; Yuan, L. LLaVA-CoT: Let Vision Language Models Reason Step-by-Step. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2411.10440. [Google Scholar]
- Ke, F.; Cai, Z.; Jahangard, S.; Wang, W.; Haghighi, P.D.; Rezatofighi, H. HYDRA: A Hyper Agent for Dynamic Compositional Visual Reasoning. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2403.12884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, T.; Kembhavi, A. Visual Programming: Compositional visual reasoning without training. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 18–22 June 2023; pp. 14953–14962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Li, C.; Wu, Q.; Lee, Y.J. Visual Instruction Tuning. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2304.08485. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, H.; Li, C.; Li, Y.; Lee, Y.J. Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA, 16–22 June 2024; pp. 26286–26296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, B.; Tang, Z.; Ye, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhang, J.; Pang, Y.; Jin, P.; Ning, M.; Luo, J.; Yuan, L. MoE-LLaVA: Mixture of Experts for Large Vision-Language Models, 2024. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2401.15947. [Google Scholar]
- Leranso Betalo, M.; Ullah, I.; Berhanu Tesema, F.; Wu, Z.; Li, J.; Bai, X. Generative AI-Driven Multiagent DRL for Task Allocation in UAV-Assisted EMPD Within 6G-Enabled SAGIN Networks. IEEE Internet Things J. 2025, 12, 35890–35907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, X.; Chen, Q.; Weng, W.; Jin, C.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Sun, G.; Li, X.; Niyato, D. Task Assignment and Exploration Optimization for Low Altitude UAV Rescue via Generative AI Enhanced Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2025, 25, 627–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, R.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; He, P.; Du, Y.; Chen, Y.; Shi, W.; Ding, G.; Hu, F. Joint Task Offloading and Resource Allocation in UAV-Assisted MEC Networks for Disaster Rescue: A Large AI Model Enabled DRL Approach. IEEE Internet Things J. 2025, 12, 48336–48350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Lian, L.; Wen, D.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, F.; Wang, W.; Shi, Y. Dynamic UAV-Assisted Cooperative Edge AI Inference. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2025, 24, 615–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haque, E.; Hasan, K.; Ahmed, I.; Alam, M.S.; Islam, T. Enhancing UAV Security Through Zero Trust Architecture: An Advanced Deep Learning and Explainable AI Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), Big Island, HI, USA, 19–22 February 2024; pp. 463–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raja, A.; Njilla, L.; Yuan, J. Adversarial Attacks and Defenses Toward AI-Assisted UAV Infrastructure Inspection. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 23379–23389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| Ref. | Description |
|---|---|
| [19] | This survey examines the design of UAV channel sounders, addressing hardware schemes, signaling, synchronization, calibration, and data processing. Challenges such as limited battery life and payload constraints and the requirements for dynamic channel adaptation are also discussed. |
| [20] | Surveys autonomous and intelligent swarms of UAVs, covering trajectory planning, task assignment, control, localization, perception, and communication. Essential technologies of UAV swarms and recent technical advancements are investigated for developing swarm systems. |
| [21] | Organizes physics-based, machine-learning, deep-learning, and reinforcement-learning models according to dynamics, uncertainty, and real-time limits. Clarifies how prediction couples with trajectory planning to enable proactive avoidance and low-latency routing. |
| [22] | Analyzes energy-efficient reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided UAV networks for the low-altitude economy. Integrates trajectory, power, and beamforming optimization with edge computing and non-orthogonal multiple access. |
| [23] | Provides a systemic analysis of radio localization in ground–air–space (GAS) networks, detailing the roles of ground, aerial, and space anchors for accurate 3D positioning. Discusses sixth-generation enablers such as reconfigurable intelligent surfaces, joint communication and sensing, and artificial intelligence for resilient services. |
| [24] | Outlines unmanned aircraft system traffic management architecture and services. Lists identification, surveillance, deconfliction, and data exchange. Contrasts centralized with decentralized decision making and reviews simulators and interoperability challenges for low-altitude operations. |
| [25] | Surveys urban airspace design and management from both academic and industrial perspectives. Analyzes trade-offs between safety, capacity, and operational freedom against technological complexity, and stresses infrastructure-aware planning. |
| References | Advantages | Limitations | Service Model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Localization [64] | Visual–inertial and network-assisted localization enables operation in GNSS-denied areas and supports cooperative updates for UAVs. | Drift accumulates without careful calibration and loop closure; multi-UAV clock synchronization is difficult in practice. | Localization service for GNSS-denied environments. |
| Localization [65,66,67] | Onboard detection and tracking with geo-tagging and device–edge split shorten the positioning loop and ease backhaul. | Accuracy drops under occlusion and lighting; edge hardware faces tight compute and power budgets. | Unified location and geo-tagging service. |
| Localization [68,69,70,71] | Generative topology with social sensing coordinates cooperative links to keep collaborative localization stable in millimeter-wave conditions. | Blockage and data bias can mislead topology search; cross-network synchronization adds overhead. | Collaborative localization service with geo-verification |
| Sensing [72] | Regional 3D mapping from RGB and multispectral flights produces ecological indicators with high spatial fidelity. | Results depend on sensor calibration and flight geometry; transfer to unfamiliar terrains is limited. | Mapping-as-a-Service for ecological surveys. |
| Sensing [73,74,75,76,77] | UAV-assisted radio-frequency (RF) threat sensing with edge pipelines and unified multimodal fusion improves timeliness and fusion quality. | Labeled RF datasets are scarce and noisy; device energy budgets constrain real-time fusion. | Threat detection service powered by multimodal fusion. |
| Communication [74,75] | Edge pipelines and on-device large language models with context-aware scheduling reduce decision latency. | Bursty demand triggers latency spikes; caching or batching policies may overfit specific content. | Inference offloading for edge LLMs. |
| Communication [78,79,80] | 5G-to-6G integration with non-terrestrial networks extends coverage and guides model–network co-design. | Rollout costs are high; satellite–air–ground handovers are complex to manage at scale. | NTN; access service |
| Communication [81,82,83] | Learning-based direction-of-arrival and split convolutional tracking enable joint sensing and communication and reduce task delay. | Generalization degrades across environments; offloading is sensitive to channel variation and input size. | ISAC for tracking offload. |
| Communication [84,85,86,87] | Foundation-model control with generative channels, routing, and diffusion design accelerates intent-driven network planning. | Generated designs lack formal guarantees; distribution shift can cause drift without expert oversight. | AI-assisted network design. |
| References | Description | Key Concept | Application/Insight |
|---|---|---|---|
| [122,123,124] | Pretrains on web-scale image–text pairs; adds language rewrites and external knowledge to boost open-set perception and retrieval. | Large-scale image–text pre-training with training refinements. | Zero-shot recognition and cross-modal retrieval for monitoring, auto-tagging, and indexing. |
| [125] | Unifies phrase grounding with open-vocabulary detection to support object-level search and indexing. | Grounded language–image pre-training for phrase-level detection. | Text-driven object search, region grounding, fine-grained inspection. |
| [126,127,128,129] | Orchestrates onboard vision–language inference with cloud planning and multimodal reasoning for patrol and multi-image analysis. | Edge–cloud orchestration for onboard perception and cloud planning. | Urban patrol, anomaly inspection, optical character recognition (OCR) for assets, multi-view evidence aggregation. |
| [130,131,132,133] | Creates shared or dual token spaces so understanding and generation run under one interface across tasks. | Unified token space for joint understanding and generation. | Unified services mixing captioning, detection, and generation; modular task composition. |
| [134,135] | Builds token-efficient video representations that enable long-context reasoning under limited computational power. | Token-efficient video representation with adaptive keyframes. | Long-video question answering (QA), mission summarization, and streaming analytics with low computational burden. |
| [136,137,138,139,140] | Adds Chain-of-Thought, compositional planning, and instruction tuning to make reasoning explicit and reliable. | Structured reasoning with Chain-of-Thought, composition, and instruction tuning. | Stepwise decision support, interpretable planning, and tool use in inspection. |
| [141] | Scales capacity with sparse experts while activating only a small subset per query. | Sparse Mixture of Experts for compute-efficient scaling. | Low-latency, large-scale perception and multi-UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) deployment. |
| [142,143,144,145] | Uses large-model-guided multi-agent learning with cooperative edge inference for task allocation, exploration, and offloading. | Large-language-model-guided multi-agent learning and cooperative edge inference. | Disaster-response tasking, exploration planning, feature aggregation, and offloading policy. |
| [146,147] | Applies zero-trust authentication and adversarial defenses with explainable analysis for safe inspection and control. | Zero-trust security with explainable adversarial defense. | Secure inspection and resilient control with continuous authentication and attack mitigation. |
| Ref. | Model Name/Type | Application Scenario | Evaluation Metrics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remote sensing scene classification and weather restoration metrics | |||
| [35] | RemoteCLIP/Vision–language model | Zero-shot remote-sensing (RS) scene retrieval and cross-modal semantic understanding. | CLRS top-1 accuracy: 66.04%. |
| [48] | Text2Earth/Text-to-image model | Text-driven RS image generation and global land-cover synthesis. | CLRS top-1 accuracy: 65.18%. |
| [38] | DOFA-CLIP/Vision–language model | Zero-shot RS scene classification with domain-adapted CLIP features. | AID top-1 accuracy: 77.60%. |
| [42] | EarthGPT/Multimodal large language model | Unified RS classification, visual question answering (VQA), and multi-sensor geospatial reasoning. | CLRS top-1 accuracy: 77.37%. |
| [52] | All-in-One Weather Removal/Unified restoration model | Multi-weather RS image restoration under haze, rain, and snow conditions. | Raindrop PSNR/SSIM: 31.12/0.9268; Snow100K-L PSNR/SSIM: 28.33/0.8820. |
| [57] | TransWeather/Transformer-based model | Single-model restoration for multiple adverse RS weather degradations. | Raindrop PSNR/SSIM: 34.55/0.9502; SnowTest100k-L PSNR/SSIM: 33.78/0.9287. |
| [59] | CLIP-Weather/CLIP-guided restoration model | CLIP-driven multi-weather RS enhancement with semantic consistency. | Raindrop PSNR/SSIM: 30.53/0.9620; SnowTest100k-L PSNR/SSIM: 29.20/0.9396. |
| Task success rate/success-based metrics | |||
| [95] | Play-LMP/Latent-plan model | Multi-task robotic manipulation learned from large-scale play data. | Success rate: 85.5%. |
| [96] | LangLfP/Language-conditioned imitation model | Language-driven manipulation, robust to paraphrased and multilingual commands. | 1-step success: 68.6%; 4-step success: 52.1%. |
| [99] | SayCan/LLM + Q-value grounding | Language-guided long-horizon task planning and execution. | Plan success: 84%. |
| [100] | VoxPoser/Composable 3D value maps | Zero-shot language-guided 3D manipulation and obstacle-aware motion. | Task success: 76.7%. |
| ImageNet top-1/visual backbone classification metrics | |||
| [104] | ViT-H/14/Vision Transformer | Generic visual backbone for large-scale image classification and perception. | ImageNet-1K top-1 accuracy: 88.1%. |
| [105] | MAE (ViT-H)/Masked autoencoder | Self-supervised visual pre-training for robust feature learning. | ImageNet-1K top-1 accuracy: 87.8%. |
| [113] | DINOv2 ViT-L/14/Self-supervised vision foundation model | Unified visual features for detection, mapping, and localization. | ImageNet-1K k-NN top-1 accuracy: 83.5%. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Hu, J.; Wang, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J. Large Model in Low-Altitude Economy: Applications and Challenges. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2026, 10, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc10010033
Hu J, Wang W, Liu Y, Zhang J. Large Model in Low-Altitude Economy: Applications and Challenges. Big Data and Cognitive Computing. 2026; 10(1):33. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc10010033
Chicago/Turabian StyleHu, Jinpeng, Wei Wang, Yuxiao Liu, and Jing Zhang. 2026. "Large Model in Low-Altitude Economy: Applications and Challenges" Big Data and Cognitive Computing 10, no. 1: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc10010033
APA StyleHu, J., Wang, W., Liu, Y., & Zhang, J. (2026). Large Model in Low-Altitude Economy: Applications and Challenges. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 10(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc10010033

