Strongyloides spp. and Cytomegalovirus Co-Infection in Patient Affected by Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
, Elena Crisà 2, Alberto Gaviraghi 3, Barbara Rizzello 3, Alessia Di Vincenzo 4, Fabrizio Carnevale-Schianca 2, Daniela Caravelli 2, Marco Fizzotti 2, Francesco Tolomeo 2, Umberto Vitolo 2, Ilaria De Benedetto 3, Nour Shbaklo 3, Alessandro Cerutti 5, Piero Fenu 6, Vanesa Gregorc 2, Silvia Corcione 3,7, Valeria Ghisetti 4 and Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa 1,3Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comment to MS: Strongyloides spp. and Cytomegalovirus Co-infection in a patient affected by non-Hodgkin lymphoma
General comment:
The authors described the first case of Strongyloides/Cytomegalovirus (CMV) concomitant infection that occurred in a European country. This case is important for clinicians in European countries for awareness of this parasitosis. Scientific sound is adequate.
The information will increase awareness of this lethal condition in patients who have obvious risk factors and present symptoms in the related field.
References need to be rechecked with the style of Journal. References numbers 11-31 can be reduced as appropriated.
Figures are clear and appropriate.
Specific comments:
Introductions, line 3 should be 30-100 million.
Please give more details about stool examination of this case.
Please recheck ref no.44
Author Response
Comment to MS: Strongyloides spp. and Cytomegalovirus Co-infection in a patient affected by non-Hodgkin lymphoma
General comment:
The authors described the first case of Strongyloides/Cytomegalovirus (CMV) concomitant infection that occurred in a European country. This case is important for clinicians in European countries for awareness of this parasitosis. Scientific sound is adequate.
The information will increase awareness of this lethal condition in patients who have obvious risk factors and present symptoms in the related field.
Dear Reviewer, thank you for these comments and this revision
References need to be rechecked with the style of Journal. References numbers 11-31 can be reduced as appropriated.
Dear reviewer, thank you for these comments that notably improve our manuscript. We have changed the text accordingly.
Figures are clear and appropriate.
Dear Reviewer, thank you for these comments and this revision
Specific comments:
Introductions, line 3 should be 30-100 million.
Dear reviewer, thank you for these comments that notably improve our manuscript. We have changed the text accordingly.
Please give more details about stool examination of this case.
Dear reviewer, thank you for these comments that notably improve our manuscript. We have changed the text accordingly.
Please recheck ref no.44
Dear reviewer, thank you for these comments that notably improve our manuscript. We have changed the text accordingly.
Reviewer 2 Report
I have made edits and comments on a word version of the file (easier since there were no line numbers). Should be attached here.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
English mostly fine, few things with the numbers however with decimals were I think would normally be a comma, just check those. In some places the language seemed a little hesitant, have changed it to be more - determined.
Author Response
I have made edits and comments on a word version of the file (easier since there were no line numbers). Should be attached here.
Dear reviewer, thank you for these comments that notably improve our manuscript. We have changed the text accordingly. Please find the changes highlighted in the text.
English mostly fine, few things with the numbers however with decimals were I think would normally be a comma, just check those. In some places the language seemed a little hesitant, have changed it to be more - determined.
Dear reviewer, thank you for these comments that notably improve our manuscript. We have revised the English accordingly. Please find the changes highlighted in the text.
