Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Geometric Modifications and the Signal Plan Optimization of Intersections in an Urban Area
Previous Article in Journal
Japan’s Urban-Environmental Exposures: A Tripartite Analysis of City Shrinkage, SAR-Based Deep Learning Versus Forward Modeling in Inundation Mapping, and Future Flood Schemes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Digital Technology and AI for Smart Sustainable Cities in the Global South: A Critical Review of Literature and Case Studies

Discipline of Civil Engineering, Sustainable Transportation Research Group (STRg), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa
Urban Sci. 2025, 9(3), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9030072
Submission received: 31 December 2024 / Revised: 14 February 2025 / Accepted: 3 March 2025 / Published: 5 March 2025

Abstract

:
Many countries across the Global South strive to align their urban development with sustainability goals. Consequently, the notion of smart sustainable cities has emerged, integrating the ideas of smart cities and sustainability. The region faces diverse challenges, including rapid population growth and financial constraints. Infrastructural deficiencies, especially in digital infrastructure and AI adoption, add to these challenges. Therefore, exploring digital technologies and AI is essential for developing smart, sustainable cities in the Global South. This paper examined both the potential and barriers to digital technologies and AI. It also explored policy implications and proposes a framework for smart sustainable cities. A qualitative methodological approach is used, including a systematic literature review and case studies. The study demonstrates how various urban challenges can be addressed with digital technologies and AI, alongside the barriers to their adoption. The study proposes a conceptual framework with three key pillars: adopting digital technologies and AI as the pivotal element, overcoming barriers, and identifying application areas to transform cities into smart sustainable cities. Moreover, the paper discusses policy implications and suggests future directions for research.

1. Introduction

The evolution of the academic and political discourse on sustainable development has progressed from an initial focus on environmental issues to encompass a broader emphasis on the environmental, social, and economic dimensions [1]. This shift gave rise to the concept of sustainable cities as a proactive response to rising issues such as environmental degradation and the need for resilient urban spaces [2]. Recognising this, the United Nations incorporated the development of sustainable cities and communities as a key focus within its Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Sustainable cities are characterised by their triple-bottom-line approach, integrating social, economic, and environmental considerations [3,4]. These cities aim to ensure that current and future generations enjoy a high quality of life while fostering resilience and inclusivity [3,5,6,7]. In this context, United Nations SDG 11—Sustainable Cities and Communities underscores its commitment to achieving green, social, and economic sustainability, emphasising inclusivity, safety, resilience, and sustainability. Essentially, sustainable cities prioritise economic opportunities, affordable housing, and robust infrastructure such as public transportation and green spaces, all shaped by participatory urban planning [3,5,6,7,8]. Furthermore, they aim to minimise resource consumption, waste, and emissions, thus promoting sustainable economic growth. This philosophy has been the cornerstone of the development of cities across the world, including many cities in various countries in the Global South.
Alongside the sustainable cities movement, the concept of smart cities has emerged, leveraging technology to enhance efficiency and optimise city functions and services [9,10,11,12,13]. Although there is no universally agreed-upon definition of smart cities, and their characteristics are context-specific, they generally emphasise the integration of economy, governance, infrastructure, and service delivery through advanced digital technology and intelligent systems. The goal is to enhance economic activities, drive social development, and improve energy efficiency, mobility solutions, and waste management, among other objectives. [9,13,14,15,16,17]. In other words, smart cities are characterised by attributes such as smart economy, mobility, environment, governance, and living, and promoting economic efficiency, environmental sustainability, inclusive governance, and liveability [18,19,20,21,22,23].
While sustainable cities traditionally focus on holistic urban development, smart cities introduce a technologically driven approach to urban management [9,13,24,25]. This shift has sparked discussions on integrating sustainability into smart city frameworks to address broader developmental goals [26,27,28,29], despite the criticism that smart cities risk prioritising technological solutions over social and environmental aspects [28,30,31,32,33].
However, there is a growing movement toward the notion of smart sustainable cities, which evolved from integrating smart and sustainable city paradigms. This evolution reflects a dynamic shift toward combining innovative technologies with sustainability goals to create urban environments that are smart and sustainable. In essence, smart sustainable cities leverage advanced digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) to optimise systems and processes, with the aim of fostering more liveable, resilient, and sustainable urban environments [19,24,34,35]. For example, smart technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), big data analytics, and AI are argued to be vital for developing efficient urban systems because these technologies facilitate the real-time monitoring and management of urban resources, mobility, infrastructure, and services, leading to improved sustainability and resilience [19,36,37,38]. Essentially, economic prosperity, environmental sustainability, the efficient operation of infrastructure, and service delivery ensure enhanced quality of life for the people [9,16,23]. While the adoption and implementation of advanced digital technologies and AI in the cities of the Global North are progressing significantly, it is observed to be challenging in the Global South [39,40,41,42,43].

1.1. The Context of Global South

The “Global South” is a socio-political term that refers to diverse nations primarily in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean, with some definitions also including Oceania. However, countries from these regions, such as Israel, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand, are excluded from the Global South. Unlike earlier categorisations such as “developing” or “Third World”, the term highlights shared histories of colonialism, persistent economic inequalities, and structural power imbalances in global geopolitics [44,45].
A key characteristic of the Global South is rapid urbanisation, often accompanied by the expansion of informal settlements and heightened vulnerability to climate change [46]. Cities in these regions face complex challenges, including fast-growing populations, large informal economies, social and economic inequalities, and environmental degradation. Climate change disproportionately affects the Global South due to a combination of factors, such as high exposure to extreme weather events—including tropical storms, droughts, and rising sea levels—along with socio-economic disparities and limited adaptive capacities [47]. Geographic conditions, particularly the dominance of tropical and subtropical climates, further exacerbate these vulnerabilities.
Additionally, large segments of the population in the Global South lack access to fundamental municipal infrastructure and services, constraining economic mobility and perpetuating poverty [48]. Despite these substantial challenges, cities in the Global South are increasingly adopting “smart sustainable city” initiatives, utilising technology and innovative governance strategies to enhance infrastructure, improve public services, foster sustainable economic growth, and promote equitable urban development.
Nevertheless, several cities in the Global South are making strides towards becoming smart sustainable cities. For example, initiatives in countries like India, Kenya, Rwanda, and Brazil are leveraging digital technologies and AI to tackle urban challenges and enhance the quality of life for their people [43,49,50]. These efforts accentuate the potential of digital technologies and AI to drive sustainable urban development and address the socio-economic disparities in these regions.

1.2. The Research Gap, Objectives, and Research Questions

Several studies have examined the concept of smart sustainable cities and the role of digital technology and AI in their development and management. However, much of this research tends to be conceptual in nature, contextually limited to countries in the Global North, or narrowly focused on specific aspects such as infrastructure, service delivery, or governance. For instance, Höjer and Wangel (2015) [28] offered the definitions and challenges of smart sustainable cities. Freeman (2017) [26] explored the origins and application of the smart sustainable city concept, while Trindade et al. (2017) [51] provided a theoretical framework linking sustainable urban development with smart city initiatives. Ahvenniemi et al. (2017) [18] compared smart and sustainable cities, underscoring that smart city technologies should support sustainable development goals. Martin et al. (2018) [33] examined the tensions within smart sustainable city visions and practices, promoting empowerment and inclusivity. Ibrahim et al. (2018) [29] outlined a roadmap for transforming cities into smart, sustainable cities. Bibri’s extensive work (2018a, 2018b, 2019) [5,30,52] investigated future smart sustainable cities and their viability in the era of big data, while Krogstie (2019) [31] introduced an innovative model for future cities. Additionally, Bibri and Krogstie (2019) [31] and Bibri (2021) [53] examined data-driven approaches to advancing smart, sustainable cities. Rjab et al. (2023) [54] critically reviewed the literature to identify barriers to adopting AI in cities. Mutambik (2024) [35] assessed culturally informed technology and its importance in transitioning to smart sustainable cities. Das (2024) [24] discussed how digital technologies, including AI, can serve as catalysts for fostering a synergetic linkage among infrastructure, service delivery, and governance.
However, since the drive for smart sustainable cities in the Global South is relatively recent, research on how digital technology and AI can leverage the development and management of such cities in this context remains limited, emphasising a significant knowledge gap in this domain. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to explore how digital technology and AI can be leveraged to develop smart sustainable cities in the Global South. Specifically, it identified key technologies and AI driving smart sustainable cities, examined their applications in urban management, analysed critical barriers to implementing digital technology and AI, examined successful case studies, and discussed the policy implications for fostering smart sustainable cities in the Global South.
In this context, the research questions investigated are as follows:
  • RQ1: How would digital technology and AI address urban challenges to foster smart sustainable cities in the Global South?
  • RQ2: What are the barriers to implementing digital technology and AI for smart sustainable cities in the Global South?
  • RQ3: What relevant policy implications would enable the creation of smart sustainable cities in the Global South?

2. Conceptualisation of Smart Sustainable Cities and Its Relevance in Global South

2.1. Defining and Conceptualising Smart Sustainable Cities

Smart sustainable cities integrate the principles of smart cities—such as efficient infrastructure, advanced technologies, and smart governance—with sustainability goals such as reducing emissions, conserving resources, and promoting social equity [5,24,31,33]. They integrate technology and data to enhance urban living, promote economic development, and ensure environmental sustainability [24,26,55,56]. In other words, smart sustainable cities leverage ICT and AI to enhance the quality of life across economic, social, environmental, and cultural facets [18]. They aim to attain a dynamic balance between economic development and environmental sustainability while enhancing economic competitiveness, fostering social inclusion, and improving living conditions. This integration involves using advanced digital technology and AI to manage urban operations and services, enhance competitiveness, and improve the quality of life of people [24,26,31,55,56].
Figure 1 presents a conceptual framework of smart sustainable cities, integrating digital technology and AI with key sustainability dimensions—economy, socio-cultural aspects, environment, and governance—alongside smart infrastructure and services to enable efficient urban management, enhanced economic competitiveness, and improved quality of life. It aims at resource conservation and its efficient utilisation, the effective management of urban operations and service delivery, emissions reduction for a healthier environment, smart governance, and social equity and inclusivity. In other words, the intended outcomes of smart sustainable cities encompass efficient urban operations and services management, improved economic competitiveness, and an enhanced quality of life [24,29]. Digital transformation (ICT and AI) is pivotal within this framework.

2.2. Digital Technologies, AI, and Their Systemic Roles in Cities

Different digital technologies, such as ICT and AI, and their applications are well-documented in scholarly literature and reports. Based on this evidence, Table 1 presents digital technologies, including ICT and AI, which can be utilised to develop smart sustainable cities [57,58,59,60]. For instance, digital technologies such as ICT, IoT, big data and analytics, and smart mobility solutions are increasingly available and are transforming urban environments [61,62]. In addition, in recent years, AI technologies such as machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), natural language processing (NLP), computer vision, reinforcement learning, and robotic process automation (RPA) have become available and can make substantial contributions to urban transformation [34,60,63].

2.3. Theoretical Framework for Digital Technologies and AI in Cities

The integration and adoption of digital technology and AI for smart, sustainable cities can be effectively analysed through established theoretical frameworks, such as the Technology–Organisation–Environment (TOE) framework and Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT). The TOE framework posits that technology adoption within organisations is influenced by three key contexts: the technological context, organisational context, and environmental context. The technological context encompasses the characteristics of the technology itself, including the relative advantage, complexity, compatibility, trialability, and observability [64,65]. The organisational context considers internal factors such as the organisational size and structure, readiness, available resources, top management support, and organisational culture [66,67]. The environmental context includes external pressures like the industry competition, regulatory landscape, market conditions, and existing technological infrastructure [66,68,69]. According to the TOE framework, the likelihood of adoption is enhanced when the technology offers demonstrable advantages, presents manageable complexity, and integrates seamlessly with current systems. It is also enhanced when the organisation possesses the requisite resources and internal support, while external environmental factors also exert significant influence.
IDT explains the diffusion of innovations within a population over time [70]. IDT categorises adopters into five groups—innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards—based on their propensity to adopt new ideas [70]. The diffusion process typically unfolds through the knowledge, persuasion, decision, implementation, and confirmation stages. Key factors influencing diffusion include the innovation’s characteristics (relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability), adopter characteristics, communication channels employed, and social system characteristics [70,71]. While IDT offers valuable insights, it has been critiqued for its potential pro-innovation bias. It does not fully account for the resistance to change due to cultural or psychological factors and its use of somewhat simplified adopter categories [72].
Given the specific focus of this study on digital technology and AI adoption in smart sustainable cities, the TOE framework is deemed more appropriate. Unlike IDT, which primarily emphasises the social and behavioural aspects of diffusion, TOE provides a structured, multi-dimensional approach that accounts for internal organisational capabilities and external environmental factors—critical considerations in urban technology deployment.

2.4. Relevance to the Global South and Potential Specific Applications

The Global South includes diverse regions in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, which face unique and significant challenges, such as rapid urbanisation, infrastructure deficits, a limited access to technology, governance and institutional challenges, financial constraints, climate-change-induced disasters, and policy issues [73,74,75]. Many countries across the Global South have initiated measures to make their cities sustainable and aspire to make them smart. However, in recent years, with the advent of smart sustainable cities, it has been argued that smart sustainable cities offer a transformative framework to tackle the challenges faced by the cities by fostering innovation, resilience, and inclusive growth [5,24,29,31]. For instance, certain cities in the Global South, e.g., Kigali, Rwanda, have pursued digital transformation through initiatives like a digital land registry to modernise and secure land ownership records [76]. Similarly, India’s Aadhaar program [77] integrates advanced technologies into urban and social services, promoting greater efficiency and sustainability. These initiatives demonstrate how smart sustainable city frameworks can be adapted to address the specific challenges and opportunities unique to different regions within the Global South.
Moreover, smart sustainable cities embody a paradigm shift by integrating sustainability goals with innovative smart solutions for holistic urban development. Given the numerous challenges faced by cities in the Global South, alongside ongoing efforts to promote sustainability and implement smart solutions, coupled with the increasing penetration of digital technologies and AI, this concept is considered particularly relevant to their urban development context. In this context, as shown in Table 2, digital technology and AI have diverse applications across various urban domains, including but not limited to planning and management, economy, infrastructure and mobility, environment, governance, and people’s living conditions.

3. Methodological Approach

This research employs a qualitative methodological framework to explore the potential and challenges of digital technology and AI for developing smart sustainable cities in the Global South. The approach constitutes an extensive and systematic review of existing literature and case study analyses. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method was employed to document the review process and report the literature [102,103].

3.1. Literature Review Process and Reporting

3.1.1. The PRISMA Process

PRISMA is a systematic and structured method commonly employed for reporting systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses conducted aimed at maintaining transparency in research processes. The PRISMA framework consists of four main stages: identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion. In the identification stage, researchers expand keywords to capture a wide range of relevant articles from databases. Screening is the next stage, where articles are either included or excluded according to set criteria, filtering out irrelevant studies. The eligibility stage involves a detailed review of each article’s title, abstract, methods, results, and discussion sections to confirm that they meet the study’s inclusion criteria and research objectives. Finally, in the inclusion stage, only those articles that fully satisfy the requirements are selected for further analysis [102,103].

3.1.2. The Search Strategy

A comprehensive review of scholarly literature was conducted to examine the key themes related to digital and AI technologies that are relevant to smart cities, sustainable cities, and smart sustainable cities. Given the interdisciplinary nature of the field, the reviewed sources span a wide array of scholarly works, including journal articles, books, book chapters, conference proceedings, reports, news articles, and online content. The search strategy aimed to capture the complexities of digital and AI technology applications for creating smart sustainable cities. For this purpose, three important and large databases, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, were searched using search strings developed using several relevant keywords. While searching the databases, the literature review focused on core aspects such as digital technology, AI, and smart sustainable cities, with particular emphasis on the context of the Global South. PRISMA checklist—covering sections like title and abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and funding—was diligently followed throughout the search process.

Identification

The identification process involved searching and listing keywords and their synonyms to retrieve as many articles as possible from different databases. The search included a broad array of keywords, focusing on digital technology and AI in smart sustainable cities. The keywords were strategically chosen to cover a wide range of relevant topics. These included the following: sustainable cities, smart cities, smart sustainable cities, ICT, digital technology, AI technology, application of digital and AI technologies, Global South, potential and challenges of digital and AI technology, strategies for smart sustainable cities, etc. The co-occurrence of keywords was also considered. Search strings were generated in the relevant formats accepted by different databases such as Scopus, Web of Sciences, Google Scholar, etc. Table 3 provides an example of the search strings used for the study (to search the Scopus database). Figure 2 presents a snapshot of the advanced search process in the Scopus database and the number of articles generated.
The search yielded a total of 6079 articles from three databases and 36 reports from websites. Duplicate records and irrelevant articles were excluded, resulting in 4648 articles and 36 reports for the next screening step.

Screening

The second phase of the search process involved screening and applying defined inclusion and exclusion criteria for precision. Table 4 outlines these criteria, which were designed using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, Study Characteristics, and Other (PICOSO) framework. The keywords and search strings used in the literature search were primarily aligned with these inclusion criteria.
Inclusion criteria comprised empirical and review articles published in peer-reviewed journals, conference proceedings articles, books, book chapters, reports, and relevant web and newspaper articles. The studies focused on contexts that include smart cities, sustainable cities, and smart sustainable cities in the Global South or developing countries, with emphasis on digital technology, ICT, IoT, AI, machine learning, robotics, deep learning (DL), natural language processing (NLP), computer vision, reinforcement learning, and robotic process automation (RPA).
In contrast, exclusion criteria were applied strategically to refine the search scope. Non-peer-reviewed articles, patents, laws, treaties, and publications in languages other than English were excluded. Studies that are not focused on smart, sustainable, or smart sustainable cities, as well as those centred primarily on technical aspects of hardware, software, and AI, were also omitted. At this stage, 143 reports from databases and 24 reports from other sources (such as websites/reports), were assessed for eligibility. The timeline for publications was set to include studies up to October 2024.

Data Extraction and Quality Appraisal

Data were extracted using a standardised extraction form that documented details such as authorship, publication date, research aims and objectives, methodology, key findings, contributions, recommendations for future research, and study limitations. The extracted information was organised in an Excel spreadsheet. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2) tool for randomised trials was utilised to evaluate potential bias. The assessments were conducted by the researcher and another independent assessor, with one verifying the other’s evaluations, followed by an independent review for accuracy. The majority of the studies were found to have a low risk of bias.
The PRISMA checklist, characteristics of the included studies, and the summary RoB 2 analysis results are included in Supplementary File S1, Supplementary File S2, and Supplementary File S3, respectively. The bias-related findings, such as Summary Risk of Bias analysis and Intention of Threat analysis, and individual Intention to Threat analysis are presented in Supplementary Files S4 and S5, respectively.

Eligibility and Inclusion in the Study

In the third phase, the eligibility assessment involved thoroughly reviewing each article’s title, abstract, objectives, methods, results, and discussion to verify alignment with the study’s inclusion criteria and central focus. Articles were excluded if they (1) failed to contribute meaningfully to the study’s aims or did not clearly align with the research objectives, (2) demonstrated potential bias through selective reporting or lacked substantial, direct contributions, or (3) were qualitative observational studies without robust evidence. Blogs and opinion pieces without supporting evidence were also excluded from the report selection.

3.2. Case Study Contexts

To reinforce the findings of the literature, case study analyses were conducted on adopting digital technology and AI in four Global South countries: India, Rwanda, Kenya, and Brazil. Selection criteria included urbanisation levels, smart city initiatives, and digital technology and AI adoption efforts. These countries are rapidly urbanising, actively pursuing smart and sustainable city initiatives, leading in digital technology adoption, and operating under democratic governance.
For example, Nairobi (Kenya), Kigali (Rwanda), and Brazil’s cities—São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and Curitiba—are at the forefront of smart city development, while India’s Smart Cities Mission aims to transform 100 cities into smart and sustainable urban centres. Although specific city-level cases were not analysed in detail, the impact of digital technology and AI across various sectors in these countries underscores their potential to drive urban transformation.

3.3. Analysis and Synthesis

3.3.1. Record Search Analysis

The records search was analysed using descriptive statistics such as the number of records identified, duplicates removed, and records screed, retrieved, and assessed following the PRISMA process; moreover, the numbers and share of articles included in the study were also observed.

3.3.2. Bibliographic Data Analysis

A comprehensive bibliometric analysis was performed on the collected articles using VOSviewer software. The analysis included network visualisations of author keyword co-occurrences and their density to identify research trends and dominant focus areas. Additionally, co-author–country and citation–country network analyses were carried out to highlight the primary regions contributing to research on smart sustainable cities and assess Global South countries’ representation in this field. Furthermore, bibliographic coupling with source network analysis was conducted to identify the key publication sources within this domain.

3.3.3. Thematic Analyses

The selected literature underwent a systematic review followed by a thematic analysis. This analysis was organised using an analytical framework with central themes and subthemes (Table 5). These themes emerged from the study characteristics of the literature reviewed and the study’s scope, ensuring their relevance. The selection was based on their significance in understanding the role of digital and AI technologies in smart sustainable cities, providing a comprehensive lens to examine fundamental concepts, existing challenges, and practical applications.
The identified themes include (1) Smart Sustainable Cities, which explores the concept and its relevance to the Global South; (2) Digital and AI Technologies for Driving Smart Sustainable Cities, which examines available technologies available for driving Smart Sustainable Cities; and (3) The Potential of Digital and AI Technologies in Smart Sustainable Cities, which highlights opportunities and benefits. Additionally, (4) Barriers to Adoption and Implementation identifies challenges hindering integration, while (5) Specific Applications of Digital and AI Technologies in the Global South focuses on contextual applications. Furthermore, as mentioned before, case studies were selected and discussed to reinforce the findings from the literature review.

4. Results

4.1. Literature Search

The detailed process of the literature search, review, and quality assessment resulted in the selection of 167 sources, including 143 eligible articles and 24 reports to be included for detailed analyses in the study. The sources comprise 113 (67.66%) journal articles, 12 books (7.19%), 12 book chapters (7.19%), 5 conference proceedings (2.99%), 24 (14.37%) reports and web articles, and 1 (0.60%) thesis. A summary of the reviewed articles is provided in Table 6. Out of the total articles and reports reviewed, 57 research articles including book chapters, and 16 reports—accounting for 73 (43.71%)—focus on various aspects of smart and sustainable cities in the Global South. Given the limited research on this topic, the proportion of articles included in the review is considered acceptable. Furthermore, as mentioned previously, four countries from the Global South were analysed as case studies.
Figure 3 illustrates the PRISMA flow chart detailing the stages of identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion in the study, along with the respective number of articles at each step.

4.2. Research Trends and Focus of Studies on Smart Sustainable Cities

The research trends and focus of studies related to smart, sustainable cities were explored through bibliographic analyses. The co-occurrence of author keywords network analysis (Figure 4) indicates that research is concentrated in six distinct clusters, represented by different colours in the figure. These clusters primarily focus on smart cities and sustainable cities; urban planning, urban policy, and governance; digital technology and artificial intelligence (AI); big data, machine learning, and cloud computing; COVID-19, city logistics, and innovation; and social sustainability, environmental sustainability, and sustainable mobility. Among these, the overarching and central themes are smart cities and sustainable cities, followed by digital technologies and AI. The network also highlights substantial interlinkages between the domains of smart and sustainable cities, digital technologies, and AI. However, as shown in Figure 5, topics such as digital transformation, digital twins, innovations, and application areas like urban development, urban innovation, smart governance, and smart mobility remain peripheral to the main research focus (Figure 5).
The co-authorship by country network (Figure 6) and citation by country network analysis (Figure 7) reveal that most research contributions originate from authors in the Republic of China, the USA, the UK, Spain, Germany, India, Italy, France, and Sweden, often through collaborative efforts (Figure 6). These collaborations are predominantly concentrated within Global North nations and China, with limited engagement involving Global South nations. Sporadic collaborations have been observed with countries such as Malaysia, Morocco, India, South Africa, Oman, and Saudi Arabia. The citation network reflects a similar trend, with significant contributions from the Republic of China and the Global North nations. However, some Global South nations—such as India, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and Morocco—have made noteworthy contributions, though most Global South nations remain underrepresented in this research domain (Figure 7).
The bibliographic coupling and source network analysis further indicate that prominent journals in this field include Sustainability, Sustainable Cities and Society, Cities, Smart Cities, IEEE Access, Energies, Journal of Cleaner Production, and Frontiers of Sustainability. These journals exhibit connections and shared references, as shown in Figure 8, underscoring their thematic alignment (Figure 8). Despite these insights, the analysis highlights that, while significant research has focused on smart cities and sustainable cities independently, studies integrating these concepts with digital technology and AI remain relatively recent and peripheral. Furthermore, contributions from Global South nations and authors are limited, and the interlinkages among publication sources are similarly constrained.
Thus, this analysis underscores a significant research gap in integrating digital technology, AI, and the concept of smart sustainable cities, particularly in the Global South. Addressing this gap requires the further exploration of the potential applications, barriers, and relevance of digital technologies and AI in developing smart sustainable cities within this context. Consequently, subsequent analyses will focus on these critical aspects to bridge the identified gaps and advance the field.

4.3. Potentials, Applications, and Barriers to Digital Technology and AI Driving Smart Sustainable Cities

4.3.1. Potential of Digital Technologies and AI in Smart Sustainable Cities

The incorporation of digital technologies is pivotal for the creation of smart sustainable cities. For example, ICT plays a critical role in modern cities, enhancing efficiency, connectivity, and citizen engagement across various sectors. It enables cities to collect, analyse, and utilise large amounts of data for improved decision-making and service delivery [104]. It also enables the integration of smart grids for energy management, smart transportation for traffic optimisation, and smart healthcare [13,101]. These technologies assist in improving operational efficiency and enhance sustainability by reducing resource consumption and emissions [18]. Furthermore, ICT is evidenced to foster citizen participation through digital platforms and e-government services, promoting transparency and accountability in governance [105].
The IoTs play a critical role by enabling real-time data collection and monitoring across various urban systems, facilitating efficient resource management and enhancing service delivery [24,47,106]. This capability would allow cities to optimise functions such as energy usage, traffic management, waste management, and water distribution, leading to improved operational efficiency and reduced costs [15,107,108].
Complementing the IoTs, big data analytics offer critical insights into urban patterns and trends, empowering city planners to make data-driven decisions that enhance urban planning and management [16,62,79]. These analytics help identify areas that require improvement and predict future needs, thereby supporting the creation of more liveable and adaptable urban environments [62,109].
Similarly, smart mobility solutions are a vital component of sustainable urban development. Technologies such as electric vehicles (EVs), bike-sharing systems, and smart traffic management systems significantly enhance urban mobility while minimising the environmental impact [15,37,82,107,110].
In the domain of AI, ML and its advanced subset, DL, are revolutionising urban management and services by enabling cities to harness the power of data. ML algorithms empower computers to learn from data and make informed decisions [89,93,111,112]. In cities, ML is pivotal for predictive maintenance, which helps in identifying when infrastructure or equipment requires attention, thus preventing costly failures and enhancing operational efficiency [113]. Additionally, ML is crucial for fraud detection by analysing transaction data to identify anomalous patterns indicative of fraudulent activities, thereby ensuring financial integrity and security [80]. Moreover, ML facilitates customer personalisation, enabling cities to tailor services and recommendations to individual preferences, thus improving citizen satisfaction and engagement [114,115,116].
Deep learning can leverage neural networks with multiple layers to analyse large datasets and uncover intricate patterns [117,118]. For example, DL applications such as image and video recognition are essential for urban security and surveillance, helping to identify objects, faces, and scenes in real time [119]. Furthermore, DL underpins energy optimisation and autonomous vehicle technology, enabling self-driving cars to navigate and make decisions in complex urban environments, thereby enhancing transportation safety and efficiency [36,120].
NLP models enable cities to develop advanced chatbots and virtual assistants that can understand and generate human language, facilitating efficient customer service and support [121]. NLP also supports opinion analysis, allowing cities to gauge public opinion and sentiment from textual data, which is vital for responsive governance and public relations [122].
Computer vision can interpret and analyse visual data, making it indispensable for urban applications such as facial recognition, which enhances security by verifying individuals’ identities [123]. It is also used in object detection, helping to monitor and manage urban infrastructure by locating and identifying various objects within a cityscape [124]. Additionally, in the medical field, computer vision aids in diagnosing diseases through the analysis of medical images like X-rays and MRIs, thereby improving public health services [125].
Reinforcement learning, a dynamic form of ML, is vital for developing AI that can make decisions by learning from interactions with its environment and optimising actions based on rewards and penalties [126]. In urban contexts, game AI utilises intelligent systems for complex problem-solving, robotics applies it to teach robots intricate tasks like assembly line operations, and autonomous driving leverages it to enable vehicles to make real-time decisions in dynamic traffic conditions, thereby enhancing safety and efficiency in transportation systems [127].
Moreover, RPA can help transform urban management by automating repetitive and rule-based tasks traditionally performed by humans [128]. RPA applications include data entry, streamlining administrative tasks and reducing human error, invoice processing that enhances financial operations, and handling routine customer service queries, improving efficiency and service delivery [129].
Thus, integrating digital technologies and AI offers significant potential for applications in urban development and management, promoting smarter, more efficient, and sustainable cities [130]. Therefore, specific areas of application that can drive smart sustainable cities in the Global South are discussed in the following subsections.

4.3.2. Barriers to Digital and AI Technology Implementation

Several technological, and organisational barriers impede the implementation of digital technologies and AI [54]. Organisational barriers encompass constraints in human, financial, and technological resources, as well as challenges related to employee and managerial dynamics, municipal initiatives, cultural factors, and regulatory frameworks. Issues such as mass unemployment, public apprehensions and distrust of AI, the absence of comprehensive legal frameworks, and adverse impacts on sustainability and economic growth also act as barriers. Technological barriers include concerns related to privacy, cybersecurity, the disruptive impact of digital technologies and AI, the limited transparency and accountability, ethical dilemmas, complex decision-making, digital inequality, the intricacies of digital and AI technology use, and challenges with data quality and availability [54].
However, the most significant systemic barriers are identified as infrastructural deficits, the digital divide and inequality, policy and governance challenges, and financial constraints [10,112,117,131,132,133]. These barriers pose substantial challenges to the widespread adoption of digital technologies and AI. The subsequent subsections present the implications of each of these barriers.

Infrastructure Deficits

Cities in the Global South face significant challenges in infrastructure development, which is a fundamental barrier to implementing advanced technologies and smart city initiatives. Many of these cities lack the necessary infrastructure, such as robust broadband networks, efficient transportation systems, and reliable energy grids, to support the deployment of AI and other digital technologies essential for sustainable urban development [10,11,17,38,112,117,134]. The absence of these critical infrastructures limits the capacity of cities to integrate and benefit from AI technologies, thereby hindering the progress toward smart sustainable city models.

Digital Divide and Inequality

A critical challenge for cities in the Global South is that there are significant disparities and inequality in access to essential services such as education and healthcare, often exacerbated by the uneven distribution of technological resources [131,132,135]. The difficulty lies in deploying digital technologies and AI to bridge the gap between different socio-economic groups, ensuring that advancements in smart sustainable city initiatives do not exacerbate the existing inequalities but rather promote social inclusion [131,132]. Disparities in access to technology and digital literacy pose significant challenges to adopting smart sustainable city solutions [49,136].

Policy and Governance

Effective policies and governance frameworks are essential for facilitating the integration of digital technologies and AI and ensuring equitable benefits [135]. Integrating AI and digital technologies into urban planning and development poses a challenge due to the high costs and technical expertise required [137]. This limitation hampers the creation of job opportunities, innovation, and the competitiveness of cities, thus impeding economic growth and development [138]. The challenge is to create a policy and governance environment that can leverage technological advancements to drive inclusive and sustainable development.

Financial Constraints

Cities in the Global South face significant financial constraints that impede the implementation of digital technologies and AI, which are needed in order to succeed in large-scale smart city projects and attain sustainability. Limited access to funding restricts investments in essential infrastructure such as broadband networks, smart grids, and data centres, which are crucial for adopting advanced technologies [112,135]. These cities often struggle to secure external funding due to stringent requirements from financial institutions, and the high costs involved make smart city projects less attractive to private investors [112,135]. Competing demands for public funds prioritise immediate needs like healthcare and education over implementing advanced technology, further limiting financial resources for smart sustainable city initiatives [139]. Additionally, ongoing operational costs for maintaining digital technologies pose a financial burden that many cities find difficult to sustain [140].

4.3.3. Applications of Digital and AI Technologies for Smart Sustainable Cities in the Global South

As discussed previously, digital technology and AI play a vital role in developing and managing smart sustainable cities. In the Global South, where rapid urbanisation and resource constraints present unique challenges, both digital technologies and AI offer innovative solutions for improving sustainability and resilience through direct communication, real-time data analysis, predictive modelling, and decision-making processes essential for managing complex urban systems. For example, AI is used to track driver travel behaviour in Bengaluru, India; Cape Town’s Smart Waste Initiative employs IoT sensors to optimise waste collection; and Rwanda’s AI-powered drone delivery system ensures timely medical supply distribution. The specific domains where these technologies can play critical roles in enabling the creation and management of smart sustainable cities include the following:

Urban Planning and Management

The application of digital technology in urban planning and management is well-established. However, the advent of AI has offered enormous potential in making urban planning and management more efficient and rigorous. For example, AI-driven tools can optimise urban planning by analysing data and creating scenarios for population growth, traffic patterns, energy consumption, environmental impacts, water management, waste management, etc. These tools can enable city planners to develop strategies that balance development with sustainability, ensuring efficient land and resource use and infrastructure development [16,26]. For example, innovative technologies like the Open Building Insights (OBI) platform and the Modeling Urban Growth (MUG) AI model represent a significant step forward in understanding how cities in Africa and India are likely to evolve. By combining satellite imagery, demographic data, and advanced machine learning, these tools offer policymakers critical insights into future infrastructure needs and urban growth patterns [141].

Transportation and Mobility

AI improves transportation systems by optimising traffic flow, reducing congestion, and enhancing public transportation. Smart mobility solutions, such as AI-powered traffic management systems and predictive analytics, can reduce travel times, enable route choice, lower emissions, and improve urban transportation efficiency [37,81,82,83]. These benefits are evidenced by examples from some Indian cities and Kigali, Rwanda. For instance, an AI camera and facial recognition system in Bangalore could monitor driver behaviour, such as fatigue from overwork and speeding. Similarly, the condition of buses is monitored through driver fatigue detection, surveillance cameras on vehicles, improvements in bus efficiency, and sensors that manage pedestrian signal crossings. In Chennai, automatic number plate recognition cameras powered by Optical Character Recognition (OCR) read traffic violations and automatically generate demand invoices for the payment of a fine sent to the violator [80]. In Kigali, IoT is used for Car Parking Spaces Management for Traffic Congestion Mitigation [107].

Energy Management

IoT and AI enhance energy management in smart sustainable cities by optimising energy production, distribution, and consumption. AI systems integrate renewable energy sources, monitor energy usage, and predict future energy demands, contributing to more sustainable energy systems [84,85,86,142]. For instance, the Puducherry Smart Grid Pilot Project in India has proven valuable in enabling the real-time monitoring of energy consumption patterns and related alarms through the Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AM) system. It also features environmentally friendly electric vehicles with charging facilities powered by solar photovoltaic (PV). Additionally, it demonstrates a Smart Home Energy Management System to encourage consumer participation, along with functionalities like smart security and microgrid controllers [143].

Waste Management

AI transforms waste management by facilitating real-time monitoring and predictive analytics to enhance the efficiency of waste collection, recycling, and disposal. For instance, Cape Town is enhancing waste management through smart systems that use sensors and data analytics to optimise collection routes and improve efficiency. The real-time monitoring of bin levels ensures timely collection, reducing overflow and littering. Additionally, the city is exploring the use of drones for waste management [144]. Smart waste management systems with the use of IoTs reduce costs, minimise environmental impacts, and improve resource recovery rates [5,30,52,87,88,89,145].

Environmental Monitoring

Digital technology, including AI, facilitates environmental monitoring by analysing data from sensors, satellites, and social media to track pollution levels, monitor biodiversity, and predict natural disasters. For example, a real-time air pollution monitoring and forecasting system, supported by Internet of Things (IoT) sensors and AI, can detect a wide range of air pollutants, including ammonia (NH3), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), ozone (O3), and particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10). It provides real-time data on pollutant concentration levels [146]. These insights help cities implement proactive measures to protect the environment and enhance climate resilience [90,91,92,93,94].

Governance and Participation

Digital technology such as ICT, IoTs, and AI enhance governance in smart sustainable cities by enabling more transparent, efficient, and inclusive decision-making processes. For example, ICT is being used for communication and information transfer for citizen participation in India, specifically in smart cities such as Cochin, Bhubaneswar, Kolkata, etc., although the challenges of the digital reduce the impact [10,24]. AI-driven platforms facilitate citizen engagement, improve service delivery, and support data-driven policy development, ensuring responsive urban governance [24,81,82,83,84,85,86].

5. Case Study Analyses

Several counties in the Global South have successfully either implemented or are in the process of implementing digital technologies and AI to promote sustainability, make some of their cities smart and sustainable, and, consequently, improve the quality of life. In the absence of examples of specific cities in the Global South, the following country-level case studies illustrate the potential of digital technologies and AI to drive smart sustainable city development.

5.1. India

India has launched several initiatives that incorporate digital technology and AI to address urban challenges such as resource management, identity verification for accessing public services, financial transactions, traffic management, pollution, etc. For example, India’s digital landscape has been revolutionised by the Aadhaar system, a biometric-based digital identity initiative that, despite some challenges, streamlines access to services and secure identity verification [147]. Alongside Aadhaar, the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) has advanced financial transactions by enabling efficient digital transactions, especially in urban areas, enhancing governance and reducing fraud [148]. The shift to digital payments has simplified financial interactions, reduced corruption, and provided valuable data for informed policymaking, demonstrating the transformative impact of a digital infrastructure on building a smart sustainable society. Furthermore, cities are exploring avenues to implement service delivery, such as traffic management, waste management, construction, etc., using AI [34,149]. For example, as mentioned previously (Section 4.3.3) in Bangalore, AI-powered cameras with facial recognition monitor driver behaviour, including fatigue from overwork and speeding. At the same time, sensors and surveillance systems enhance bus efficiency and pedestrian safety. In Chennai, OCR-based automatic number plate recognition cameras detect traffic violations and issue fines directly to offenders [82]. However, integrating AI into urban development is hindered by a significant digital divide, with disparities in Internet access and digital literacy between different sections of the people [150,151]. This gap limits the reach of smart city solutions. Further, concerns over data privacy and security pose challenges, as the extensive deployment of sensors and surveillance systems in AI-driven cities leads to the collection of vast amounts of personal data, raising issues related to data protection and public trust [152].

5.2. Kenya

AI is being implemented across various sectors in Kenya, including agriculture, healthcare, education, fintech, and transportation. The country is actively positioning itself to leverage the benefits of Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) technologies such as AI. Furthermore, as East Africa’s leading tech hub, Nairobi supports innovation through tech incubators and co-working spaces in Nairobi, fostering economic growth and solidifying its status as a centre for digital innovation [153]. In 2018, the government established the Blockchain and AI Taskforce to guide the strategic use of AI [154]. Moreover, the energy distribution system is transformed by adopting ICT and AI-enabled smart grid technologies that enhance efficiency and reliability. AI-powered smart meters also provide real-time data on energy consumption, helping to reduce wastage and support sustainable practices [49,155]. However, the absence of comprehensive and structured AI-specific policies and the regulatory and policy gaps pose challenges related to data privacy, ethical AI use, and legal compliance, thus hindering the implementation [156,157].

5.3. Rwanda

Rwanda has made significant progress in developing a smart sustainable city by incorporating digital and AI technologies into its urban planning and management processes. The country has introduced a digital land registry, modernising and securing land ownership records [76]. Supported by a robust digital infrastructure, this initiative revolutionises land transactions, reduces fraud, and improves record accuracy, leading to greater transparency and efficiency in the real estate sector. Additionally, the adoption of digital technology in land management has streamlined processes and positively influenced governance by minimising corruption, boosting accountability, and supporting informed decision-making in urban planning [158]. Similarly, the “Tap&Go” smart card system for public transport has streamlined fare payments and improved commuter efficiency, helping address urban mobility and reducing traffic congestion [159]. Furthermore, IoT is utilised for managing car parking spaces to mitigate traffic congestion [107]. However, Rwanda faces challenges in digital technology and AI adoption due to a shortage of skilled professionals in AI and digital technologies, which slows the deployment of smart city initiatives. Moreover, the lack of structured data ecosystems impedes the effective deployment of AI solutions [160,161,162].

5.4. Brazil

Brazil leverages ICT and AI in urban planning to tackle challenges from rapid urbanisation. The São Paulo Research Foundation, a leading scientific institution in Brazil, has partnered with IBM to establish the first Latin American branch of IBM’s AI Horizons Network [163]. In Brazil, AI has proliferated in the private sector—particularly in areas like e-commerce, finance, and technology-driven companies—and in the public sector. The push for digitalisation to enhance service quality has spurred investment in these technologies. For instance, the Brazilian federal government has launched the Brazilian Strategy for Artificial Intelligence (EBIA) in 2021, which aims to guide state actions to promote research, innovation, and the development of AI solutions [164]. However, Brazil faces several challenges in leveraging AI and digital technologies for smart sustainable cities. Infrastructure gaps, including uneven broadband access, limit AI deployment [165,166]. Moreover, regulatory fragmentation and bureaucratic inefficiencies hinder the effective implementation of smart city initiatives [166]. Socio-economic inequality exacerbates digital exclusion, preventing the widespread access to AI-driven urban services [167]. Cybersecurity and data privacy risks remain concerns due to the weak enforcement of the General Data Protection Law [166].

6. Discussion, Policy Implications, and Recommendations

6.1. Discussion

The evolution of sustainable development discourse has expanded from an initial focus on environmental issues to a more comprehensive consideration of social and economic dimensions [1]. This broader perspective has been instrumental in shaping the concept of sustainable cities, which emerged as a response to pressing challenges such as environmental degradation and the need for urban resilience [2]. Recognising these complexities, the United Nations included the development of sustainable cities and communities in its SDGs (SDG 11), underscoring the need for a multi-dimensional approach that encompasses social, economic, and environmental sustainability [4].
Sustainable cities are envisioned as urban areas that integrate economic opportunities, affordable housing, and comprehensive infrastructure, emphasising public transportation and green spaces, all guided by participatory planning [3,5,7,8]. This model aims to balance current and future needs, fostering inclusive and resilient urban environments. While cities worldwide, including those in the Global South, have adopted this model to varying extents, the parallel emergence of smart cities presents a distinct, technologically driven approach to urban development [10,11]. Smart cities, although lacking a single definitive concept, generally emphasise the integration of digital technologies to enhance urban functions, aiming to create more efficient, liveable, and sustainable environments [9,13,14,82]. These cities utilise advanced digital technology to improve aspects such as governance, mobility, and infrastructure, often focusing on economic efficiency and environmental sustainability [25,26]. However, there is criticism that smart cities sometimes prioritise technological advancements over addressing deeper social and environmental concerns [3,28,32,33].
To address the challenges and leverage the advantages of smart cities while ensuring sustainability, the concept of smart sustainable cities has recently emerged. This concept combines the efficiency of smart technologies with the holistic goals of sustainable development [14,19,24,30,31]. Smart sustainable cities are characterised by efficient resource management, sustainable infrastructure, and enhanced connectivity, which are essential for balancing economic growth with environmental conservation and social inclusion [18,24]. This evolution reflects a significant shift towards using advanced digital tools to meet sustainability targets while improving the quality of life in cities. The adoption of digital technology and AI, such as ICT, IoT, big data, and AI-driven tools, plays a critical role in optimising urban functions, enhancing decision-making, and improving the overall quality of life [16,101,104].
The successful adoption of digital technology and AI in smart sustainable cities in the Global South requires addressing key technological, organisational, and environmental factors in alignment with the Technology–Organisation–Environment (TOE) framework. Technologically, digital innovations offer significant advantages in improving efficiency, sustainability, and urban management [64]. However, infrastructure deficits, the digital divide, and integration complexities hinder their widespread adoption [39,41,112,131,133,136,137,139,140]. Ensuring compatibility, affordability, and scalability is essential. Organisationally, governance structures, financial resources, and institutional capacity must be strengthened [66]. Weak governance, financial constraints, and a lack of institutional readiness pose significant challenges; yet, successful implementations in India, Rwanda, Kenya, and Brazil highlight the importance of strong policy frameworks, and inter-agency collaboration. Investment in institutional capacity building, cross-sector partnerships, and innovative financing mechanisms is necessary. Environmentally, external factors such as regulatory landscapes, market conditions, and infrastructure availability influence adoption [68].
Despite the challenges, cities in the Global South, such as those in India, Rwanda, Kenya, and Brazil, are making strides toward smart sustainable city development by leveraging digital technology and AI to address urban issues and enhance people’s quality of life [24,50]. In the Global South, these technologies offer transformative solutions for urban planning, transportation, energy management, waste management, environmental monitoring, and governance, helping cities address rapid urbanisation and resource constraints [26]. Successful implementations in cities of the above-mentioned countries demonstrate the potential of these technologies for enhancing urban sustainability, making the cities smart and sustainable [24,26].
Thus, while the concept of smart sustainable cities holds promise for the Global South, realising this vision requires overcoming substantial hurdles and adapting technologies and AI to local contexts. Moreover, a framework for the adoption and implementation of digital technology and AI for smart sustainable cities is needed. In this context, a conceptual framework is presented in Figure 9.
The framework is built on three pillars based on the three key factors (Technological, Organisational, and Environmental) of the TOE framework: the adoption of digital technology and AI, the resolution of critical barriers, and the identification of specific application areas in Global South cities. Digital technology and AI play a pivotal role in addressing urban challenges and enabling efficient solutions for essential city functions. As emerged from the study, the key barriers to the adoption of digital technology and AI in Global South cities are infrastructure deficits, the digital divide, policy and governance challenges, and financial constraints. Overcoming these barriers is crucial for enhancing the implementation and effectiveness of digital solutions within the cities of the Global South.
Furthermore, important application areas in Global South cities that can benefit from digital technology and AI include urban planning and management, transportation and mobility, energy management, waste management, environmental monitoring, and governance with stakeholder participation. The study indicates that some of these areas are already being addressed through digital technology and AI in the case study cities.
Addressing these barriers and integrating digital technology and AI into critical urban functions can enhance urban management, improve service delivery, boost competitiveness, and elevate the quality of life, ultimately transforming cities into smart, sustainable cities in the Global South (Figure 9). Strengthening efficiency in these key domains through digital interventions will likely accelerate this transformation. However, the specific barriers and application areas may vary depending on each city’s unique context and priorities. Therefore, policies and strategies for adopting digital technology and AI must be tailored to the local needs and challenges of each city to ensure smart sustainable city development.

6.2. Policy Implications and Recommendations

Policies should be developed and implemented to leverage the potential of digital technology and AI while addressing challenges in the Global South to create smart sustainable cities. Critical policy implications and recommendations include the following:
  • The identification and prioritisation of city functions and application areas: Critical city functions that require enhanced efficiency, along with key areas for digital technology and AI applications, should be identified and prioritised based on the city’s specific needs. Municipalities should conduct needs assessments to identify critical city functions, such as transportation, healthcare, waste management, and energy, where digital technology and AI can yield the most significant benefits. Given financial constraints, these assessments should prioritise areas where technology can provide a significant return on investment in terms of efficiency and impact. A collaborative, evidence-based approach involving local experts and stakeholders is essential for aligning digital solutions with the city’s long-term goals while being mindful of budget limitations.
  • Enhancing collaboration and partnerships: Collaboration and partnerships between governments, the private sector, and civil society are essential for mobilising resources, including funding for infrastructure and expertise in smart, sustainable city development. Given the resource constraints, collaboration between governments, the private sector, and civil society is vital for mobilising funding and expertise for smart, sustainable city development. Governments should focus on creating public–private partnerships (PPPs) that incentivise private-sector investment in infrastructure. Multi-stakeholder platforms, including civil society, academia, and international donors, should be established to share knowledge, co-finance initiatives, and build capacity. Digital platforms should be utilised to enhance transparency and accountability in partnerships, ensuring the efficient use of resources within financial limitations.
  • Strengthening institutional capacities: Building institutional capacities to manage and regulate digital technologies and AI is essential for their effective adoption and sustainable implementation. Governments should strategically invest in building institutional capacities by prioritising training for key and relevant personnel, regulators, and city planners in digital technologies, data management, and AI. Given resource limitations, this can be achieved through partnerships with universities, training programs, and online courses, ensuring continuous skill development without significant financial burden. Establishing dedicated units within local governments focused on digital transformation can streamline policy development and technology adoption while ensuring that regulatory frameworks evolve in line with technological advancements.
  • Promoting inclusive development and people’s participation: Policies should prioritise inclusivity in smart, sustainable city initiatives, ensuring they benefit marginalised communities. Digital technology and AI-driven participation are key to bridging the digital divide and promoting inclusivity. Policies should focus on inclusivity in smart, sustainable city initiatives, ensuring they benefit marginalised communities despite financial constraints. Digital technology and AI-driven participation should be prioritised to bridge the digital divide. Given financial constraints, policies can focus on affordable digital literacy programs, utilising existing community centres or local organisations to provide training. Cities can design cost-effective digital platforms that facilitate public participation, leveraging open-source tools and local expertise to engage communities in decision-making. AI-powered community-based monitoring tools can be developed incrementally, ensuring their scalability as resources allow.
  • Encouraging innovation and research: Investing in research and innovation is crucial for developing context-specific solutions to the unique challenges faced by cities in the Global South. The focus should be on increasing the targeted funding for research and development that addresses the specific challenges of cities in the Global South. This can be achieved by prioritising projects that deliver high-impact, context-specific solutions within available budgets. Collaborations with universities, research institutes, and tech companies should be established to leverage existing resources and foster innovation. Public-sector innovation hubs can incubate start-ups with low operational costs, providing essential resources like mentorship and access to seed funding to help scale local solutions.

7. Conclusions and Future Research

The development of smart sustainable cities in the Global South is a crucial approach for tackling the complex challenges of rapid urbanisation and promoting sustainable development. Integrating advanced digital technologies and AI into urban planning and management offers the transformative potential to create efficient, resilient, and inclusive cities. However, realising this vision requires overcoming significant barriers, including infrastructure deficits, financial limitations, and governance challenges. The successful implementation of smart sustainable city models hinges on a comprehensive approach that prioritises innovation, inclusivity, and adaptability to local contexts. This approach should prioritise not only technological advancements but also the social and economic aspects, ensuring that the benefits of urban development are shared equitably among all residents. Moreover, fostering smart sustainable cities in the Global South involves a multi-dimensional effort that balances current needs with future aspirations, ultimately contributing to global sustainable development goals.
This paper contributes in terms of identifying the types of digital technologies and AI suitable for smart sustainable cities and examining how they can address urban challenges to promote smart, sustainable development in the Global South. It also explores the barriers to implementing these technologies and the related policy implications for developing smart sustainable cities in this region. Furthermore, a conceptual framework is presented that is likely to offer a way forward for the city development authorities and municipalities in their endeavour to transform their cities into smart, sustainable cities. However, it should be tailored to each city’s specific contexts, needs, and demands.
However, this paper has limitations. It relies on a literature review and a limited case study analysis. The study’s limitations include the reliance on only three databases—Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar—excluding many other potentially relevant databases. Additionally, no automation tools were employed for removing duplicates or merging database records. Furthermore, most of the reviewed articles were qualitative studies, with only a limited number of empirical studies. This reflects the nature of the discipline, the relative newness of the study domain, and the general scarcity of empirical research in this field. Consequently, the findings may not be conclusive and, as the field evolves, significant empirical studies may either reinforce or contest the conclusions drawn.
Additionally, it does not propose a unified vision for urban planning in the Global South but instead offers a conceptual framework for adopting digital technology and AI in the development of smart sustainable cities.
Future research should include context-specific empirical analyses to refine and adapt the conceptual framework to the unique socio-economic, cultural, and environmental contexts of individual cities within the Global South. Additionally, studies on policy and governance mechanisms for effectively integrating digital technology and AI are essential. Moreover, future research incorporating a broader database coverage and more empirical studies would strengthen the validity and generalizability of the findings.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/urbansci9030072/s1, Supplementary File S1: PRISMA Checklist; Supplementary File S2: Study Characteristics; Supplementary File S3: Cochrane Summary Risk of Bias (RoB2) analysis; Supplementary File S4: Summary Risk of Bias Analysis; Supplementary File S5: individual Intention to Threat analysis.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the assistance of research assistants and colleagues who assisted in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Prizzia, R. Sustainable Development in an International Perspective. In Handbook on Globalisation and the Environment; Thai, K.V., Rahm, D., Coggburn, J.D., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 19–42. [Google Scholar]
  2. UNCED. Agenda 21. Rio de Janeiro: United Nations. The Triple Bottom Line: What Is It and How Does It Work? 1992. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21 (accessed on 22 July 2024).
  3. Heinberg, R. What Is a Sustainable City? The Edmonton Sustainability Papers. 2010. Available online: https://edmontonsocialplanning.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/edmontonsocialplanning.ca_joomlatools-files_docman-files_E.-URBAN-ISSUES_E.01-PLANNING_2010-sustainable_city.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2024).
  4. Slaper, T.; Hall, T.J. The Triple Bottom Line: What Is It and How Does It Work. Indiana Bus. Rev. 2011, 86, 4–8. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bibri, S.E. Smart Sustainable Cities of the Future; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Girardet, H. Sustainable cities: A contradiction in terms. In The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Cities, 1st ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 1999; p. 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hassan, A.M.; Lee, H. The Paradox of the Sustainable City: Definitions and Examples. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2015, 17, 1267–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Javidroozi, V.; Carter, C.; Grace, M.; Shah, H. Smart, Sustainable, Green Cities: A State-of-the-Art Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Batty, M.; Axhausen, K.W.; Giannotti, F.; Pozdnoukhov, A.; Bazzani, A.; Wachowicz, M.; Ouzounis, G.; Portugali, Y. Smart Cities of the Future. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2012, 214, 481–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Das, D.K.; Chadchan, J. A Proposed Framework for an Appropriate Governance System to Develop Smart Cities in India. Territ. Politics Gov. 2023, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Praharaj, S.; Han, H. Cutting through the Clutter of Smart City Definitions: A Reading into the Smart City Perceptions in India. City Cult. Soc. 2019, 18, 100289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Saha, A.R.; Singh, N. Smart Cities for a Sustainable Future: Can Singapore Be a Model for Delhi? Int. J. Econ. Res. 2017, 14, 367–379. [Google Scholar]
  13. Townsend, A.M. Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia, 1st ed.; W.W. Norton & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cavada, M.; Hunt, D.V.L.; Rogers, C.D.F. Do Smart Cities Realise Their Potential for Lower Carbon Dioxide Emissions? Eng. Sustain. 2016, 169, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dankan Gowda, V.; Patil, S.; Srinivas, V.; Prasad, K.; Jagtap, M.M.; Kaur, M. Smart Urban Ecosystems with IoT-Based Strategies for Traffic Optimization and Pollution Control. In Proceedings of the 2024 2nd International Conference on Advancement in Computation & Computer Technologies (InCACCT), Gharuan, India, 2–3 May 2024; pp. 777–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kitchin, R. The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 2014, 79, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yigitcanlar, T.; Desouza, K.; Butler, L.; Roozkhosh, F. Contributions and Risks of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Building Smarter Cities: Insights from a Systematic Review of the Literature. Energies 2020, 13, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ahvenniemi, H.; Huovila, A.; Pinto-Seppä, I.; Airaksinen, M. What Are the Differences between Sustainable and Smart Cities? Cities 2017, 60, 234–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Angelidou, M. The Role of Smart City Characteristics in the Plans of Fifteen Cities. J. Urban Technol. 2017, 24, 3–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chu, J.; Zhong, A.; Zhang, W. Characteristics and Problems of Smart City Construction above the Prefecture Level in China: An Exploratory Study. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 2024, 150, 04024014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Das, D. Perspectives of smart cities in South Africa through applied systems analysis approach: A case of Bloemfontein. Constr. Econ. Build. 2020, 20, 65–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Das, D.; Emuze, F. Smart City Perspectives of Bloemfontein, South Africa. J. Constr. Proj. Manag. Innov. 2014, 4, 930–949. [Google Scholar]
  23. Giffinger, R.; Fertne, C.; Kramar, H.; Kalasek, R.; Pichler, M.N.; Evert, M. Smart Cities–Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities; Final Project Report; Centre of Regional Science, Vienna UT: Vienna, Austria, 2007; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  24. Das, D.K. Exploring the Symbiotic Relationship between Digital Transformation, Infrastructure, Service Delivery, and Governance for Smart Sustainable Cities. Smart Cities 2024, 7, 806–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. De Jong, M.; Joss, S.; Schraven, D.; Zhan, C.; Weijnen, M. Sustainable–Smart–Resilient–Low Carbon–Eco–Knowledge Cities; Making Sense of a Multitude of Concepts Promoting Sustainable Urbanization. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 109, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Freeman, G. The Origin and Implementation of the Smart-Sustainable City Concept, The Case of Malmö, Sweden. Master of Science in Environmental Sciences, Policy & Management (MESPOM) Thesis, Lund University–University of Manchester, University of the Aegean, Central European University, Lund, Sweden, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  27. García-Fuentes, M.Á.; de Torre, C. Towards Smarter and More Sustainable Cities: The Remourban Model. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2017, 4, 328–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Höjer, M.; Wangel, J. Smart Sustainable Cities: Definition and Challenges. In ICT Innovations for Sustainability; Hilty, L.M., Aebischer, B., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 310, pp. 333–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ibrahim, M.; El-Zaart, A.; Adams, C. Smart Sustainable Cities Roadmap: Readiness for Transformation towards Urban Sustainability. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 37, 530–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bibri, S.E. On the Sustainability of Smart and Smarter Cities in the Era of Big Data: An Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Literature Review. J. Big Data 2019, 6, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bibri, S.E.; Krogstie, J. Generating a Vision for Smart Sustainable Cities of the Future: A Scholarly Backcasting Approach. Eur. J. Futures Res. 2019, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hollands, R.G. Will the Real Smart City Please Stand up?: Intelligent, Progressive or Entrepreneurial? City 2008, 12, 303–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Martin, C.J.; Evans, J.; Karvonen, A. Smart and Sustainable? Five Tensions in the Visions and Practices of the Smart-Sustainable City in Europe and North America. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2018, 133, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kotecha, P. Unlocking the Potential of AI in Smart Cities, The Increasing Connectivity of Cities Through IoT Devices Presents a Remarkable Opportunity; Financial Express; Spon Press: London, UK, 2023; Available online: https://www.financialexpress.com/business/digital-transformation-unlocking-the-potential-of-ai-in-smart-cities-3245974/ (accessed on 24 July 2024).
  35. Mutambik, I. Culturally Informed Technology: Assessing Its Importance in the Transition to Smart Sustainable Cities. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Aljohani, A. Deep Learning-Based Optimization of Energy Utilization in IoT-Enabled Smart Cities: A Pathway to Sustainable Development. Energy Rep. 2024, 12, 2946–2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Al-Kaff, A. Navigating the Future: AI Innovations for Intelligent Mobility in Smart Cities; SAE Technical Paper 2023-01-1901; SAE International Mobilus USAM: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Allam, Z.; Dhunny, Z. On Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Smart Cities. Cities 2019, 89, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Amankwah-Amoah, J. Global Business and Emerging Economies: Towards a New Perspective on the Effects of e-Waste. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2016, 105, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fromhold-Eisebith, M.; Eisebith, G. What Can Smart City Policies in Emerging Economies Actually Achieve? Conceptual Considerations and Empirical Insights from India. World Dev. 2019, 123, 104614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ghosh, B.; Arora, S. Smart as (Un)Democratic? The Making of a Smart City Imaginary in Kolkata, India. Environ. Plan. C Politics Space 2022, 40, 318–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Goyal, S.; Sahni, A.; Garg, T. Identification and prioritisation of barriers in building smart cities. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol. 2018, 9, 819–827. [Google Scholar]
  43. Korah, P.I. Smart urban development strategies in Africa? An analysis of multiple rationalities for Accra’s City Extension Project. In Smart Cities for Technological and Social Innovation: Case Studies, Current Trends, and Future Steps; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 157–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dados, N.; Connell, R. The Global South. Contexts 2012, 11, 12–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mahler, A.G. What/Where Is the Global South? Oxford Bibliographies in Literary and Critical Theory; O’Brien, E., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ode, E.L. A Comparative Analysis of Global North and Global South Economies. J. Sustain. Dev. Afr. 2010, 12, 338–347. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lobell, D.B.; Burke, M.B.; Tebaldi, C.; Mastrandrea, M.D.; Falcon, W.P.; Naylor, R.L. Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 2008, 319, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mahendra, A.; King, R.; Du, J.; Dasgupta, A.V.; Beard, A.; Kallergis, A.; Schalch, K. Seven Transformations for More Equitable and Sustainable Cities; World Resources Report, Towards a More Equal City; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Groenendaal, B. Kenya to Roll Out Smart Meters to 55000 SME Customers 2022. Available online: https://www.greenbuildingafrica.co.za/kenya-power-to-roll-out-smart-meters-to-55000-sme-customers/ (accessed on 22 July 2024).
  50. Kumar, V.T.M.; Dahiya, B. Smart Economy in Smart Cities. In Smart Economy in Smart Cities; Vinod Kumar, T.M., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 3–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Trindade, E.P.; Hinnig, M.P.F.; Da Costa, E.M.; Marques, J.S.; Bastos, R.C.; Yigitcanlar, T. Sustainable Development of Smart Cities: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2017, 3, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bibri, S.E. The IoT for Smart Sustainable Cities of the Future: An Analytical Framework for Sensor-Based Big Data Applications for Environmental Sustainability. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 38, 230–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bibri, S.E. Data-Driven Smart Sustainable Cities of the Future: An Evidence Synthesis Approach to a Comprehensive State-of-the-Art Literature Review. Sustain. Futures 2021, 3, 100047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rjab, A.B.; Mellouli, S.; Corbett, J. Barriers to Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda. Gov. Inf. Q. 2023, 40, 101814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. UNECE. Smart Sustainable Cities. United Nations. (n.d). Available online: https://unece.org/housing/smart-sustainable-cities (accessed on 12 May 2024).
  56. ITU. An Overview of Smart Sustainable Cities and the Role of Information and Communication Technologies. Focus Group Technical Report. The International Telecommunication Union. 2014. Available online: www.itu.int (accessed on 12 May 2024).
  57. European Commission. Powering European Public Sector Innovation: Towards a New Architecture. 2013. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/powering-european-public-sector-innovation-towards-new-architecture (accessed on 16 October 2023).
  58. European Commission. Joint Research Centre. AI Watch, AI Uptake in Smart Mobility. Publications Office. 2021. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/879190 (accessed on 12 May 2024).
  59. Heng, S.; Tsilionis, K.; Scharff, C.; Wautelet, Y. Understanding AI Ecosystems in the Global South: The Cases of Senegal and Cambodia. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2022, 64, 102454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Khlie, K.; Benmamoun, Z. Towards Smarter and Greener Cities: Harnessing AI and Green Technology for Urban Sustainability. J. Infrastruct. Policy Dev. 2024, 8, 6300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Moriarty, P. Advanced Communication and Computational Technologies in a Sustainable Urban Context: Smart Grids, Smart Cities and Smart Health. In Power Systems: Vol. Part F1423; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 389–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mortaheb, R.; Jankowski, P. Smart City Re-Imagined: City Planning and GeoAI in the Age of Big Data. J. Urban Manag. 2023, 12, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Singh, M. User Submission—Revolutionizing City Transportation: The Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Traffic Management. INDIAai. 2023. Available online: https://indiaai.gov.in/article/revolutionizing-city-transportation-the-influence-of-artificial-intelligence-on-traffic-management (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  64. Ahmed, A.; Mat, N. Exploring digital marketing adoption dynamics in Pakistani startups through the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework. J. Dev. Entrep. 2024, 29, 2450020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tornatzky, L.G.; Fleischer, M. The Processes of Technological Innovation; Lexington Books: Lanham, MD, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  66. Yoopetch, C.; Chareanporn, T. Measuring Hotel Financial and Non-Financial Performance in Thailand: The Application of Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) Framework. J. Ecohumanism 2024, 3, 1703–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhu, K.; Kraemer, K.L. Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Inf. Syst. Res. 2005, 16, 61–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gong, X.; Lü, L.; Yao, N.; Guo, Q. Configurational paths of entrepreneurial activity: An analysis based on the technology–organization–environment framework. Am. J. Econ. Sociol. 2024, 83, 831–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Oliveira, T.; Martins, M.F. Literature review of information technology adoption models at the firm level. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval. 2011, 14, 110–121. [Google Scholar]
  70. Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed.; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  71. Vernanda, D.; Niqotaini, Z.; Susilawati; Buchori, A.S. The Innovation Diffusion Theory for Analysis the Digitalization of ‘Rasa Alami’ MSMEs at Subang Regency. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS), Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia, 7–8 November 2023; pp. 653–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kee, K.F.; Dearing, J.W. Diffusion. In Organisational Communication Theory and Research; Miller, V.D., Poole, M.S., Eds.; De Gruyter Mouton: Berlin, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 2024; pp. 197–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. AfDB. African Economic Outlook (AEO). 2019. Available online: https://www.afdb.org/en/documents/document/african-economic-outlook-aeo-2019-107319 (accessed on 5 May 2024).
  74. Satterthwaite, D.; Archer, D.; Colenbrander, S.; Dodman, D.; Hardoy, J.; Mitlin, D.; Patel, S. Building Resilience to Climate Change in Informal Settlements. One Earth 2020, 2, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Simon, D.; Leck, H. Understanding Climate Adaptation and Transformation Challenges in African Cities. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2015, 13, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. UNECA. Digital technology key to property management Technologies like drones help collect land photos for image analysis, and in the demarcation of plot boundaries. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Land Policy in Africa (CLPA-2021), Kigali, Rwanda, 1–4 November 2021; Available online: https://www.un.org/africarenewal/magazine/december-2021/digital-technology-key-property-management (accessed on 12 June 2024).
  77. World Bank. Aadhaar: Lessons Learned. 2018. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2018/05/07/aadhaar-lessons-learned (accessed on 14 June 2024).
  78. Mark, R. Ethics of Public Use of AI and Big Data. ORBIT J. 2019, 2, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yigitcanlar, T.; O’Connor, K.; Westerman, C. The Making of Knowledge Cities: Melbourne’s Knowledge-Based Urban Development Experience. Cities 2008, 25, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. West, J.; Bhattacharya, M. Intelligent Financial Fraud Detection: A Comprehensive Review. Comput. Secur. 2016, 57, 47–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. De Nigris, S.; Hradec, J.; Craglia, M.; Nepelski, D. AI Watch: AI Uptake in Smart Mobility, EUR 30821 EN; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2021; JRC126302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Iyer, L.S. AI Enabled Applications towards Intelligent Transportation. Transp. Eng. 2021, 5, 100083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jevinger, Å.; Zhao, C.; Persson, J.A.; Davidsson, P. Artificial Intelligence for Improving Public Transport: A Mapping Study. Public Transp. 2024, 16, 99–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Binyamin, S.S.; Ben Slama, S.A.; Zafar, B. Artificial Intelligence-Powered Energy Community Management for Developing Renewable Energy Systems in Smart Homes. Energy Strategy Rev. 2024, 51, 101288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Gabriel, F.; Bergers, J.; Aschersleben, F.; Dröder, K. Increasing the Energy-Efficiency in Vacuum-Based Package Handling Using Deep Q-Learning. Energies 2021, 14, 3185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Li, X.; Wang, Q.; Tang, Y. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Development on Urban Energy Efficiency—Based on the Perspective of Smart City Policy. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ahmed, A.A.; Asadullah, A.B. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Waste Management and Recycling. Eng. Int. 2020, 8, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Fang, B.; Yu, J.; Chen, Z.; Osman, A.I.; Farghali, M.; Ihara, I.; Hamza, E.H.; Rooney, D.W.; Yap, P.-S. Artificial Intelligence for Waste Management in Smart Cities: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2023, 21, 1959–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gude, D.K.; Bandari, H.; Challa, A.K.R.; Tasneem, S.; Tasneem, Z.; Bhattacharjee, S.B.; Lalit, M.; Flores, M.A.L.; Goyal, N. Transforming Urban Sanitation: Enhancing Sustainability through Machine Learning-Driven Waste Processing. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bhatia, M.; Meenakshi, N.; Kaur, P.; Dhir, A. Digital Technologies and Carbon Neutrality Goals: An in-Depth Investigation of Drivers, Barriers, and Risk Mitigation Strategies. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 451, 141946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chisom, O.N.; Biu, P.W.; Umoh, A.A.; Obaedo, B.O.; Adegbite, A.O.; Abatan, A. Reviewing the role of AI in environmental monitoring and conservation: A data-driven revolution for our planet. World J. Adv. Res. Rev. 2024, 21, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Dong, M.; Wang, G.; Han, X. Impacts of artificial intelligence on carbon emissions in China: In terms of artificial intelligence type and regional differences. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 113, 105682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Szramowiat-Sala, K. Artificial Intelligence in Environmental Monitoring: Application of Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning for Pollution Prevention and Toxicity Measurements. Preprints 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhang, X.; Shu, K.; Rajkumar, S.; Sivakumar, V. Research on Deep Integration of Application of Artificial Intelligence in Environmental Monitoring System and Real Economy. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2021, 86, 106499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Aldegheishem, A. Assessing Progress towards Smart Governance in Saudi Arabia. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2024, 11, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Biygautane, M.; Clegg, S. Constructing Smart Cities through the Use of Public-Private Partnerships: The Case of Dubai in the United Arab Emirates. J. Infrastruct. Policy Dev. 2024, 8, 3668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Li, X.; Xu, H.; Shen, H.; Hsu, W.L.; Yu, P.-Y. Smart City Governance: Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 2nd Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare and Sustainability (ECBIOS), Tainan, Taiwan, 9–31 May 2020; pp. 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Medaglia, R.; Gil-Garcia, J.R.; Pardo, T.A. Artificial Intelligence in Government: Taking Stock and Moving Forward. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 2023, 41, 123–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sameer, N.; Alalouch, C.; Saleh, M.S.; Al-Saadi, S.; Saleem, A. Towards Sustainable Smart Cities: A Study on Digital Participatory Planning in Oman. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Urban Des. Plan. 2022, 175, 72–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Sharma, G.D.; Yadav, A.; Chopra, R. Artificial Intelligence and Effective Governance: A Review, Critique and Research Agenda. Sustain. Futures 2020, 2, 100004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Caragliu, A.; Del Bo, C.; Nijkamp, P. Smart Cities in Europe. J. Urban Technol. 2011, 18, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Komninos, N. Intelligent Cities: Innovation, Knowledge Systems, and Digital Spaces; Spon Press: London, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  105. Foth, M.; Brynskov, M.; Ojala, T. (Eds.) Citizen’s Right to the Digital City; Springer: Singapore, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Atzori, L.; Iera, A.; Morabito, G. The Internet of Things: A Survey. Comput. Netw. 2010, 54, 2787–2805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Bisetsa, J.G.; Bizimana, Z.; Umutoni, M.R.; Nzanywayingoma, F.; Nduwingoma, M. IoT Applications in Kigali Car Parking Spaces Management for Traffic Congestion Mitigation. In Proceedings of the 2024 13th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications, Bali Island, Indonesia, 1–3 February 2024; pp. 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Gubbi, J.; Buyya, R.; Marusic, S.; Palaniswami, M. Internet of Things (IoT): A Vision, Architectural Elements, and Future Directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2013, 29, 1645–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hashem, I.A.T.; Yaqoob, I.; Anuar, N.B.; Mokhtar, S.; Gani, A.; Ullah Khan, S. The Rise of “Big Data” on Cloud Computing: Review and Open Research Issues. Inf. Syst. 2015, 47, 98–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Banister, D. Sustainable Mobility Paradigm. Transp. Policy 2008, 15, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Jordan, M.I.; Mitchell, T.M. Machine Learning: Trends, Perspectives, and Prospects. Science 2015, 349, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Mohammadi, M.; Al-Fuqaha, A. Enabling Cognitive Smart Cities Using Big Data and Machine Learning: Approaches and Challenges. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Susto, G.A.; Schirru, A.; Pampuri, S.; McLoone, S.; Beghi, A. Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance: A Multiple Classifier Approach. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 2015, 11, 812–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Aggarwal, C.C. Recommender Systems; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Arana-Catania, M.; Lier, F.-A.V.; Procter, R.; Tkachenko, N.; He, Y.; Zubiaga, A.; Liakata, M. Citizen Participation and Machine Learning for a Better Democracy. Digit. Gov. Res. Pract. 2021, 2, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kowalski, R.; Esteve, M.; Jankin Mikhaylov, S. Improving Public Services by Mining Citizen Feedback: An Application of Natural Language Processing. Public Adm. 2020, 98, 1011–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Chen, Q.; Wang, W.; Wu, F.; De, S.; Wang, R.; Zhang, B.; Huang, X. A Survey on an Emerging Area: Deep Learning for Smart City Data. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell. 2019, 3, 392–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. LeCun, Y.; Bengio, Y.; Hinton, G. Deep Learning. Nature 2015, 521, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hossain, M.Z.; Sohel, F.; Shiratuddin, M.F.; Laga, H. A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Learning for Image Captioning. ACM Comput. Surv. 2019, 51, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bojarski, M.; Del Testa, D.; Dworakowski, D.; Firner, B.; Flepp, B.; Goyal, P.; Jackel, L.D.; Monfort, M.; Muller, U.; Zhang, J.; et al. End to End Learning for Self-Driving Cars. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1604.07316. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.07316 (accessed on 12 August 2024).
  121. Young, T.; Hazarika, D.; Poria, S.; Cambria, E. Recent Trends in Deep Learning Based Natural Language Processing. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 2018, 13, 55–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Medhat, W.; Hassan, A.; Korashy, H. Sentiment Analysis Algorithms and Applications: A Survey. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2014, 5, 1093–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Zhao, W.; Chellappa, R.; Phillips, P.J.; Rosenfeld, A. Face Recognition: A Literature Survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 2003, 35, 399–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ren, S.; He, K.; Girshick, R.; Sun, J. Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. arXiv 2015. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.01497 (accessed on 14 August 2024). [CrossRef]
  125. Litjens, G.; Kooi, T.; Bejnordi, B.E.; Setio, A.A.A.; Ciompi, F.; Ghafoorian, M.; Van Der Laak, J.A.W.M.; Van Ginneken, B.; Sánchez, C.I. A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis. Med. Image Anal. 2017, 42, 60–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Sutton, R.S.; Barto, A.G. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, 2nd ed.; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  127. Mnih, V.; Kavukcuoglu, K.; Silver, D.; Rusu, A.A.; Veness, J.; Bellemare, M.G.; Graves, A.; Riedmiller, M.; Fidjeland, A.K.; Ostrovski, G.; et al. Human-Level Control through Deep Reinforcement Learning. Nature 2015, 518, 529–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Aguirre, S.; Rodriguez, A. Automation of a Business Process Using Robotic Process Automation (RPA): A Case Study. In Applied Computer Sciences in Engineering; Figueroa-García, J.C., López-Santana, E.R., Villa-Ramírez, J.L., Ferro-Escobar, R., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 742, pp. 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Willcocks, L.; Lacity, M.; Craig, A. Robotic Process Automation: Strategic Transformation Lever for Global Business Services? J. Inf. Technol. Teach. Cases 2017, 7, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. McMillan, L.; Varga, L. A Review of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Methods in Infrastructure Systems. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2022, 116, 105472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Heeks, R. Digital Inequality beyond the Digital Divide: Conceptualizing Adverse Digital Incorporation in the Global South. Inf. Technol. Dev. 2022, 28, 688–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Vargas García, A.; Golovanevsky, L.; Chachagua, M.R. Social Inequality, Technological Inequality and Educational Heterogeneity in the Light of the Conectar Igualdad OLPC Programme (Salta, Argentina, 2015–2017). In Digital Inequalities in the Global South; Ragnedda, M., Gladkova, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 319–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Viale Pereira, G.; Cunha, M.A.; Lampoltshammer, T.J.; Parycek, P.; Testa, M.G. Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance: A cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives. Inf. Technol. Dev. 2017, 23, 526–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Echeverría, J.; Tabarés, R. Artificial Intelligence, Cybercities and Technosocieties. Minds Mach. 2017, 27, 473–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ali, K.S.; Faroque, A.R. Addressing the complexity of the digital divide and the role of government in addressing it: Role of government in bridging the digital divide. In Fostering Sustainable Businesses in Emerging Economies: The Impact of Technology; Emerald Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK, 2023; pp. 127–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Yigitcanlar, T.; Cugurullo, F. The Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence: An Urbanistic Viewpoint from the Lens of Smart and Sustainable Cities. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Datta, A. The Digitalising State: Governing Digitalisation-as-Urbanisation in the Global South. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 2023, 47, 141–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Gurumurthy, A.; Bharthur, D. Impact of Digitalisation in the Ports Sector. SSRN J. 2019, 5, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Freire, C.A.R.; Ferreira, F.A.F.; Carayannis, E.G.; Ferreira, J.J.M. Artificial Intelligence and Smart Cities: A DEMATEL Approach to Adaptation Challenges and Initiatives. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2023, 70, 1881–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Anthopoulos, L.G. Understanding Smart Cities: A Tool for Smart Government or an Industrial Trick? Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Petersen, B. How AI Is Rewriting Urban Planning in Developing Regions 2024. Available online: https://ventureburn.com/2024/11/how-ai-is-rewriting-urban-planning-in-developing-regions/ (accessed on 18 September 2024).
  142. Yusuff, A.; Mosetlhe, T. Artificial Intelligence Solution for Energy Management. In Proceedings of the 2023 31st Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference (SAUPEC), Johannesburg, South Africa, 24–26 January 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Jha, I.S.; Sen, S.; Kumar, R. Smart grid development in India—A case study. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth National Power Systems Conference (NPSC), Guwahati, India, 18–20 December 2014; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Medium. The Future of Waste Management: Exploring Cape Town’s Green Strategies 2024. 2024. Available online: https://medium.com/@pickup_78022/the-future-of-waste-management-exploring-cape-towns-green-strategies-026c6d79dfe4 (accessed on 20 September 2024).
  145. Thomaz, P.L.I.; Fernando, M.C.; Pereira Calôba, L. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Applied to Waste Management: A Contingency Measure to Fill out the Lack of Information Resulting from Restrictions on Field Sampling. Waste Manag. Bull. 2023, 1, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Ramadan, M.N.A.; Ali, M.A.H.; Shin, Y.K.; Alkhedher, M.; Alherbawi, M. Real-time IoT-powered AI system for monitoring and forecasting of air pollution in industrial environment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 283, 116856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Nilekani, N. India’s Aadhaar System: Bringing E-Government to Life. (n.d.). Available online: https://www.chandlerinstitute.org/governancematters/indias-aadhaar-system-bringing-e-government-to-life (accessed on 20 September 2024).
  148. Ojha, S. Unified Payments Interface: Why Made-in-India UPI Is Becoming a Global Favourite? 2023. Available online: https://www.livemint.com/money/personal-finance/unified-payments-interface-why-made-in-india-upi-is-becoming-a-global-favourite-11698047714911.html (accessed on 20 September 2024).
  149. Singh, A.K.; Kumar, V.R.P.; Dehdasht, G.; Mohandes, S.R.; Manu, P.; Pour Rahimian, F. Investigating the Barriers to the Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Sustainable Construction Projects. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 403, 136840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Laskar, M.H. Examining the emergence of digital society and the digital divide in India: A comparative evaluation between urban and rural areas. Front. Sociol. 2023, 8, 1145221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Mullick, M.; Patnaik, A. Pandemic management, citizens and the Indian Smart cities: Reflections from the right to the smart city and the digital divide. City Cult. Soc. 2022, 30, 100474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Chakrabarty, S.P.; Ghosh, J.; Mukherjee, S. Privacy Issues of Smart Cities: Legal Outlook; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 295–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. iHub. About iHub. Retrieved from iHub. 2021. Available online: https://ihub.co.ke// (accessed on 21 September 2024).
  154. Akello, J. Policy Brief Artificial Intelligence in Kenya, Paradigm Initiative Supported. 2022. Available online: https://paradigmhq.org/report/policy-brief-artificial-inteligence-in-kenya/ (accessed on 21 September 2024).
  155. Muraga, C.; Tadesse, G.A. AI: A Catalyst for Progressive Future in Kenya and Beyond. Capital Business 2024. 2024. Available online: https://www.capitalfm.co.ke/business/2024/02/ai-a-catalyst-for-progressive-future-in-kenya-and-beyond/ (accessed on 21 September 2024).
  156. Gwagwa, A.; Kraemer-Mbula, E.; Rizk, N.; Rutenberg, I.; de Beer, J. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Deployments in Africa: Benefits, Challenges and Policy Dimensions. Afr. J. Inf. Commun. 2020, 26, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Omoga, C.O. Challenges in Implementing Artificial Intelligence within Management Information Systems: Case of County Governments in Kenya. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 2023, 12, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Ali, D.A.; Deininger, K.; Duponchel, M. New Ways to Assess and Enhance Land Registry Sustainability: Evidence from Rwanda. World Dev. 2017, 99, 377–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. The New Times Rwanda. Digital transformation and productivity. The New Times Rwanda, 5 March 2021.
  160. Bakunzibake, P.; Grönlund, Å.; Klein, G.O. Organisational Challenges in the Implementation of ‘one-stop’ e-Government in Rwanda. Electron. J. E-Gov. 2019, 17, 1–19. Available online: https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejeg/article/view/663 (accessed on 25 September 2024).
  161. Mukamurenzi, S.; Grönlund, Å.; Islam, M.S. Challenges in implementing citizen-centric e-government services in Rwanda. Electron. Gov. Int. J. 2019, 15, 283–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Yongabo, P.; Göransson, B. Constructing the national innovation system in Rwanda: Efforts and challenges. Innov. Dev. 2020, 12, 155–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Tang, E. Brazil & Artificial Intelligence. Rebellion Research 2020. 2020. Available online: https://blog.rebellionresearch.com/blog/brazil-artificial-intelligence (accessed on 12 August 2024).
  164. Siscaro, S. Brazil Excels in the Use of Artificial Intelligence. News CCBC 2022 (26 April 2022). Available online: https://ccbc.org.br/en/publicacoes/news-ccbc/brazil-excels-in-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence/ (accessed on 12 August 2024).
  165. Barros, D.A.T.d.M.; Morais, E.A.M.; Kassab, M.; Graciano Neto, V.V. Preliminaries on the State-of-the-Practice on Smart Cities Projects in Brazil. In Anais Estendidos do XX Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação (SBSI 2024); SBC: Brasilia, Brazil, 2024; pp. 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Vasconcelos, E.S.; dos Santos, F.A. Artificial Intelligence in Brazilian public management: Challenges and opportunities for government efficiency. In Seven Editora; Seven Publicações: São José dos Pinhais, Brazil, 2024; pp. 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Nicolás, M.A.; Sampaio, R.C. Balancing efficiency and public interest: The impact of AI automation on social benefit provision in Brazil. Internet Policy Rev. 2024, 13, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptualising a smart sustainable city integrating digital technology and AI (Adapted from [24]).
Figure 1. Conceptualising a smart sustainable city integrating digital technology and AI (Adapted from [24]).
Urbansci 09 00072 g001
Figure 2. Example of a snapshot of documents accessed on Scopus databases using the search string.
Figure 2. Example of a snapshot of documents accessed on Scopus databases using the search string.
Urbansci 09 00072 g002
Figure 3. PRISMA flow chart of search and selection process.
Figure 3. PRISMA flow chart of search and selection process.
Urbansci 09 00072 g003
Figure 4. Co-occurrence of author keywords network.
Figure 4. Co-occurrence of author keywords network.
Urbansci 09 00072 g004
Figure 5. Co-occurrence of author keywords density visualisation.
Figure 5. Co-occurrence of author keywords density visualisation.
Urbansci 09 00072 g005
Figure 6. Co-authorship with countries’ network.
Figure 6. Co-authorship with countries’ network.
Urbansci 09 00072 g006
Figure 7. Citation countries network analysis.
Figure 7. Citation countries network analysis.
Urbansci 09 00072 g007
Figure 8. Bibliographic coupling and sources network analyses.
Figure 8. Bibliographic coupling and sources network analyses.
Urbansci 09 00072 g008
Figure 9. A conceptual framework for the adoption and implementation of digital technology and AI for smart sustainable cities.
Figure 9. A conceptual framework for the adoption and implementation of digital technology and AI for smart sustainable cities.
Urbansci 09 00072 g009
Table 1. Digital and AI technologies for smart sustainable cities.
Table 1. Digital and AI technologies for smart sustainable cities.
Digital TechnologiesSourcesAI TechnologiesSources
ICT[57,58,59,60,61,62]Machine Learning (ML)[34,57,58,59,60,63]
IoT Deep Learning (DL)
Big Data and Analytics Natural Language Processing (NLP)
Smart Mobility Solutions Computer Vision
Reinforcement Learning
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
Compiled from Sources: Kotecha (2023) [34]; European Commission (2013) [57]; European Commission, Joint Research Centre (2021) [58]; Heng, Tsilionis, Scharff, Wautelet (2022) [59]; Khlie, Benmamoun (2024) [60]; Moriarty (2023) [61]; Mortaheb, Jankowski (2023) [62]; and Singh, (2023) [63].
Table 2. Specific application areas of digital technology and AI under different urban domains.
Table 2. Specific application areas of digital technology and AI under different urban domains.
Urban DomainsApplication AreasSources
Planning and management Urban planning and management[16,26,62,78]
EconomyOptimal resource utilisation and management [18,21,23]
Knowledge economy [79]
Finance[80]
Enhance competitiveness[21,23,79]
Infrastructure and mobilityTransportation and mobility[37,81,82,83]
Energy management [84,85,86]
Waste management [5,30,52,87,88,89]
EnvironmentEnvironmental monitoring [90,91,92,93,94]
Reduction in emissions[18]
Governance Governance, participation and responsiveness [24,81,82,83,84,85,86]
Equity and inclusiveness[24,95,96,97,98,99,100]
People and living conditions Quality of life[13,22,23,101]
Health care[13,22,23]
Education [13,22,23]
Table 3. The search string.
Table 3. The search string.
Database Search String
ScopusTITLE-ABS-KEY (Smart sustainable cities AND smart cities AND sustainable cities) AND (Digital Technology OR Information Communication Technology OR Internet of Things OR Big Data and Analytics OR Smart Mobility Solutions) OR (Artificial Intelligence OR (Machine Learning (ML) OR Deep Learning (DL) OR Natural Language Processing (NLP) OR Computer Vision OR Reinforcement Learning OR Robotic Process Automation (RPA)) AND (Potential AND Barriers) AND Strategies AND Global South
Table 4. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Table 4. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Inclusion Exclusion
Peer-reviewed journals, books, book chapters, conference proceedings, and reportsNon-peer-reviewed journals
Empirical and conceptual papersReview papers, patents, laws, meta-analyses, opinion articles, and debate articles
English languageOther languages than English
Smart cities, sustainable cities, and smart sustainable citiesStudies focusing on hardware and software of technology and AI
Digital technology, Information Communication Technology, Internet of Things, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Robotics, Deep Learning (DL), Natural Language Processing (NLP), Computer Vision, Reinforcement Learning, Robotic Process Automation (RPA)Studies not focusing on smart, sustainable, and smart sustainable cities.
Global South, developing countries
Table 5. Themes and subthemes for thematic analyses.
Table 5. Themes and subthemes for thematic analyses.
Sl No.Themes Subthemes
1Smart Sustainable Cities
  • Defining Smart, Sustainable Cities
  • Conceptualising Smart Sustainable Cities
  • Relevance to the Global South
2Digital and AI technologies for driving Smart Sustainable Cities
3The Potential of Digital and AI Technologies in Smart, Sustainable Cities
  • The potential of digital technologies in smart sustainable cities
  • The potential of AI technologies in smart sustainable cities
4Barriers to adoption and implementation
  • Infrastructure Deficits
  • Digital Divide and inequality
  • Policy and Governance
  • Financial Constraints
5Specific applications of digital and AI technologies for smart sustainable cities in the Global South
  • Urban Planning and Management
  • Transportation and Mobility
  • Energy Management
  • Waste Management
  • Environmental Monitoring
  • Governance and Participation
6Case Studies
  • India
  • Rwanda
  • Kenya
  • Brazil
Table 6. Summary of literature reviewed.
Table 6. Summary of literature reviewed.
Literature SourceTotal (Numbers) Share (%)Global South (Number)Share (%)
Journal 11367.665739.86
Books 127.19
Book chapters127.19
Conference proceedings52.99
Reports/web articles2414.371562.5
Thesis10.60
Total167 100.0073 43.71
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Das, D.K. Digital Technology and AI for Smart Sustainable Cities in the Global South: A Critical Review of Literature and Case Studies. Urban Sci. 2025, 9, 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9030072

AMA Style

Das DK. Digital Technology and AI for Smart Sustainable Cities in the Global South: A Critical Review of Literature and Case Studies. Urban Science. 2025; 9(3):72. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9030072

Chicago/Turabian Style

Das, Dillip Kumar. 2025. "Digital Technology and AI for Smart Sustainable Cities in the Global South: A Critical Review of Literature and Case Studies" Urban Science 9, no. 3: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9030072

APA Style

Das, D. K. (2025). Digital Technology and AI for Smart Sustainable Cities in the Global South: A Critical Review of Literature and Case Studies. Urban Science, 9(3), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9030072

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop