Next Article in Journal
Quantum Correlation Enhanced Optical Imaging
Next Article in Special Issue
Coulomb Spike Model of Radiation Damage in Wide Band-Gap Insulators
Previous Article in Journal
Prototype Setup Hardware Choice for the DUCK System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Evaluation of Two Analytical Functions for the Microdosimetry of Ions from 1H to 238U

1
Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
2
Nuclear Science and Engineering Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai 319-1195, Ibaraki, Japan
3
Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka University, Suita 567-0047, Osaka, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Quantum Beam Sci. 2024, 8(3), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs8030018
Submission received: 30 May 2024 / Revised: 28 June 2024 / Accepted: 8 July 2024 / Published: 10 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quantum Beam Science: Feature Papers 2024)

Abstract

The analytical microdosimetric function (AMF) implemented in the Monte Carlo code PHITS is a unique tool that bridges the gap between macro- and microscopic scales of radiation interactions, enabling accurate microdosimetric calculations over macroscopic bodies. The original AMF was published in 2006, based on the results of track structure calculations. Recently, a newer version of the AMF was proposed, incorporating an improved description of the energy loss at the microscopic scale. This study compares the older and the newer AMFs in computing microdosimetric probability distributions, mean values, and the relative biological effectiveness (RBE). To this end, 16000 microdosimetric lineal energy probability density distributions were simulated with PHITS for ions from 1H to 238U over a broad energy range (1–1000 MeV/n). The newer AMF was found to offer superior performance, particularly for very heavy ions, producing results that align more closely with published in vitro clonogenic survival experiments. These findings suggest that the updated AMF provides a more reliable tool for microdosimetric calculations and RBE modeling, essential for ion radiation therapy and space radiation protection.
Keywords: microdosimetry; PHITS; RBE; ion radiotherapy; space radiation microdosimetry; PHITS; RBE; ion radiotherapy; space radiation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Parisi, A.; Furutani, K.M.; Sato, T.; Beltran, C.J. Comparative Evaluation of Two Analytical Functions for the Microdosimetry of Ions from 1H to 238U. Quantum Beam Sci. 2024, 8, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs8030018

AMA Style

Parisi A, Furutani KM, Sato T, Beltran CJ. Comparative Evaluation of Two Analytical Functions for the Microdosimetry of Ions from 1H to 238U. Quantum Beam Science. 2024; 8(3):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs8030018

Chicago/Turabian Style

Parisi, Alessio, Keith M. Furutani, Tatsuhiko Sato, and Chris J. Beltran. 2024. "Comparative Evaluation of Two Analytical Functions for the Microdosimetry of Ions from 1H to 238U" Quantum Beam Science 8, no. 3: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs8030018

APA Style

Parisi, A., Furutani, K. M., Sato, T., & Beltran, C. J. (2024). Comparative Evaluation of Two Analytical Functions for the Microdosimetry of Ions from 1H to 238U. Quantum Beam Science, 8(3), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs8030018

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop