You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • David F. Metzger1,*,
  • Christoph Klahn2 and
  • Roland Dittmeyer1

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous Reviewer 3: Alexey Salimon

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Please find attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

thank you very much for your accurate analysis. We used your feedback to re-focus our article. By clarifying several portions, we made it more appealing to the reader.

Find in the file attached the comments of yours, our replies to them, and excerpts from the improved article if applicable.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Please find attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Please replace some words to better fit the customary expression methods in scientific papers.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

thank you very much for your comments that we used to make the article more appealing to the reader.

Find in the file attached the comments of yours and our replies to them.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Please find attached.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

thank you very much for your comments that we used to make the article more appealing to the reader.

Find in the file attached the comments of yours, our replies to them, and excerpts from the improved article if applicable.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

 

Please find attached.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf