Next Article in Journal
Effects of Normative Aging on Eye Movements during Reading
Next Article in Special Issue
Aesthetic Image Statistics Vary with Artistic Genre
Previous Article in Journal
Immunohistochemical Analysis of a Vitreous Membrane Removed from a Patient with Incontinentia Pigmenti-Related Retinal Detachment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Questions for the Psychology of the Artful Mind
Open AccessArticle

Individual Differences in Aesthetic Preferences for Multi-Sensorial Stimulation

Institute of Education, University College London, London WC1H 0AL, UK
Department of Psychology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S10 2BP, UK
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 October 2019 / Revised: 19 December 2019 / Accepted: 30 December 2019 / Published: 6 January 2020
The aim of the current project was to investigate aesthetics in multi-sensorial stimulation and to explore individual differences in the process. We measured the aesthetics of interactive objects (IOs) which are three-dimensional objects with electronic components that exhibit an autonomous behaviour when handled, e.g., vibrating, playing a sound, or lighting-up. The Q-sorting procedure of Q-methodology was applied. Data were analysed by following the Qmulti protocol. The results suggested that overall participants preferred IOs that (i) vibrate, (ii) have rough surface texture, and (iii) are round. No particular preference emerged about the size of the IOs. When making an aesthetic judgment, participants paid more attention to the behaviour variable of the IOs than the size, contour or surface texture. In addition, three clusters of participants were identified, suggesting that individual differences existed in the aesthetics of IOs. Without proper consideration of potential individual differences, aesthetic scholars may face the risk of having significant effects masked by individual differences. Only by paying attention to this issue can more meaningful findings be generated to contribute to the field of aesthetics. View Full-Text
Keywords: multi-sensorial stimulation; individual difference; aesthetic preference multi-sensorial stimulation; individual difference; aesthetic preference
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, J.; Soranzo, A. Individual Differences in Aesthetic Preferences for Multi-Sensorial Stimulation. Vision 2020, 4, 6.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop