Next Article in Journal
Grasping Discriminates between Object Sizes Less Not More Accurately than the Perceptual System
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Influencing Pseudo-Accommodation—The Difference between Subjectively Reported Range of Clear Focus and Objectively Measured Accommodation Range
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Changing Landscape: High-Level Influences on Eye Movement Guidance in Scenes
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview

Regressions during Reading

1
Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA
2
Department of Psychology, Bergische Universitaet, 42103 Wuppertal, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vision 2019, 3(3), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/vision3030035
Received: 28 February 2019 / Revised: 31 May 2019 / Accepted: 24 June 2019 / Published: 9 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Eye Movements and Visual Cognition)
  |  
PDF [659 KB, uploaded 9 July 2019]
  |  

Abstract

Readers occasionally move their eyes to prior text. We distinguish two types of these movements (regressions). One type consists of relatively large regressions that seek to re-process prior text and to revise represented linguistic content to improve comprehension. The other consists of relatively small regressions that seek to correct inaccurate or premature oculomotor programming to improve visual word recognition. Large regressions are guided by spatial and linguistic knowledge, while small regressions appear to be exclusively guided by knowledge of spatial location. There are substantial individual differences in the use of regressions, and college-level readers often do not regress even when this would improve sentence comprehension. View Full-Text
Keywords: reading; eye movements; regressions; individual differences reading; eye movements; regressions; individual differences
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Inhoff, A.W.; Kim, A.; Radach, R. Regressions during Reading. Vision 2019, 3, 35.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Vision EISSN 2411-5150 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top