Next Article in Journal
Grasping Discriminates between Object Sizes Less Not More Accurately than the Perceptual System
Next Article in Special Issue
Eye Behavior During Multiple Object Tracking and Multiple Identity Tracking
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Influencing Pseudo-Accommodation—The Difference between Subjectively Reported Range of Clear Focus and Objectively Measured Accommodation Range
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Changing Landscape: High-Level Influences on Eye Movement Guidance in Scenes
Open AccessReview

Regressions during Reading

Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA
Department of Psychology, Bergische Universitaet, 42103 Wuppertal, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vision 2019, 3(3), 35;
Received: 28 February 2019 / Revised: 31 May 2019 / Accepted: 24 June 2019 / Published: 9 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Eye Movements and Visual Cognition)
Readers occasionally move their eyes to prior text. We distinguish two types of these movements (regressions). One type consists of relatively large regressions that seek to re-process prior text and to revise represented linguistic content to improve comprehension. The other consists of relatively small regressions that seek to correct inaccurate or premature oculomotor programming to improve visual word recognition. Large regressions are guided by spatial and linguistic knowledge, while small regressions appear to be exclusively guided by knowledge of spatial location. There are substantial individual differences in the use of regressions, and college-level readers often do not regress even when this would improve sentence comprehension. View Full-Text
Keywords: reading; eye movements; regressions; individual differences reading; eye movements; regressions; individual differences
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Inhoff, A.W.; Kim, A.; Radach, R. Regressions during Reading. Vision 2019, 3, 35.

AMA Style

Inhoff AW, Kim A, Radach R. Regressions during Reading. Vision. 2019; 3(3):35.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Inhoff, Albrecht W.; Kim, Andrew; Radach, Ralph. 2019. "Regressions during Reading" Vision 3, no. 3: 35.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop