Next Article in Journal
Distinguishing Hemodynamics from Function in the Human LGN Using a Temporal Response Model
Next Article in Special Issue
The Sun/Moon Illusion in a Medieval Irish Astronomical Tract
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances of Computerized Graphical Methods for the Detection and Progress Assessment of Visual Distortion Caused by Macular Disorders
Open AccessPerspective

Ocular Equivocation: The Rivalry Between Wheatstone and Brewster

Department of Psychology, University of Dundee, Nethergate, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK
Vision 2019, 3(2), 26;
Received: 14 May 2019 / Revised: 31 May 2019 / Accepted: 3 June 2019 / Published: 6 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from the Scottish Vision Group Meeting 2019)
Ocular equivocation was the term given by Brewster in 1844 to binocular contour rivalry seen with Wheatstone’s stereoscope. The rivalries between Wheatstone and Brewster were personal as well as perceptual. In the 1830s, both Wheatstone and Brewster came to stereoscopic vision armed with their individual histories of research on vision. Brewster was an authority on physical optics and had devised the kaleidoscope; Wheatstone extended his research on audition to render acoustic patterns visible with his kaleidophone or phonic kaleidoscope. Both had written on subjective visual phenomena, a topic upon which they first clashed at the inaugural meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1832 (the year Wheatstone made the first stereoscopes). Wheatstone published his account of the mirror stereoscope in 1838; Brewster’s initial reception of it was glowing but he later questioned Wheatstone’s priority. They both described investigations of binocular contour rivalry but their interpretations diverged. As was the case for stereoscopic vision, Wheatstone argued for central processing whereas Brewster’s analysis was peripheral and based on visible direction. Brewster’s lenticular stereoscope and binocular camera were described in 1849. They later clashed over Brewster’s claim that the Chimenti drawings were made for a 16th-century stereoscope. The rivalry between Wheatstone and Brewster is illustrated with anaglyphs that can be viewed with red/cyan glasses and in Universal Freeview format; they include rivalling ‘perceptual portraits’ as well as examples of the stimuli used to study ocular equivocation. View Full-Text
Keywords: Wheatstone; Brewster; Chimenti; binocular rivalry Wheatstone; Brewster; Chimenti; binocular rivalry
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Wade, N.J. Ocular Equivocation: The Rivalry Between Wheatstone and Brewster. Vision 2019, 3, 26.

AMA Style

Wade NJ. Ocular Equivocation: The Rivalry Between Wheatstone and Brewster. Vision. 2019; 3(2):26.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wade, Nicholas J. 2019. "Ocular Equivocation: The Rivalry Between Wheatstone and Brewster" Vision 3, no. 2: 26.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop