Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The review is attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Respected Reviewer,

Fishes Journal, 

MDPI.

Dear Sir,

 

Many thanks for your suggestions and accepting the paper for publication in fishes. I will thoroughly look into your suggestion regarding theoritic model that investigate time consistency in international agreements in future. For this article, I beleive as you suggested, shall be published in existing form. 

Regards.

 

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is interesting and deals with current topics of potential conflicts between those who have to legislate and regulate fishing activities and those who must comply with increasingly stringent and complex rules. The paper is quite well written and easy to understand even for those who deal with more scientific aspects of fishing.

Author Response

Respected Reviewer,

Fishes Journal,

MDPI.

Dear Sir,

Many thanks for your approval in publishing this article in current form.

 

Regards.

Reviewer 3 Report

This research addresses the maritime dispute settlement law to sustainable fishery governance. Overall, the communication is great. However, it will be better if the following minor issues is addressed: There is no sub-headings for Section 2 and 3, which are 4-5 pages long sections. It will be better to have some sub-headings to make the structure of these two sections clearer.

Author Response

Respected Reviewer,

Fishes Journal,

MDPI.

Dear Sir, 

Many thanks for your suggestions, the article has been improved according to your suggestions, the sub-headings are added.

Looking forward towards your final approval.

 

Regards.