1. Introduction
Global aquaculture intensification has driven increasing demand for cost-effective and sustainable feed resources, especially for high-value carnivorous fish species. For carnivorous fish, traditional aquaculture practices rely heavily on live prey (e.g., live baitfish) [
1,
2], which poses challenges such as high production costs, ethical concerns over prey species welfare, and risks of disease transmission (e.g., viruses or parasites) [
3,
4]. Artificial compound feeds have emerged as a practical alternative to address these limitations, with benefits including standardized nutrient profiles, improved operational convenience, and reduced reliance on wild capture fisheries. Nevertheless, the transition from natural live prey to formulated feeds is often accompanied by suboptimal physiological outcomes in farmed fish, such as disrupted metabolic homeostasis, excessive hepatic lipid accumulation, and reduced stress resilience [
3,
5,
6]. Accumulating evidence indicates that such dietary-induced metabolic alterations stem from two interrelated categories of driving factors: differences in nutrient composition that directly modulate hepatic metabolic flux, and differences in feed characteristics that indirectly regulate metabolic pathway activation [
7,
8,
9]. Specifically, the direct regulatory effect is determined by both macronutrient levels and their in vivo bioavailability, while the indirect regulatory cascade involves not only physical feed form and predation-associated energy cost, but also feed-induced shifts in gut microbiota that further reshape hepatic metabolism via the gut–liver axis [
5,
10]. Therefore, understanding the physiological and metabolic adaptations to artificial feeds—particularly at the organ and molecular levels—is critical for guiding targeted feed formulation optimization and advancing the sustainable intensification of global aquaculture.
Fish livers perform diverse core metabolic tasks, including nutrient transformation, energy balance maintenance and toxicant clearance. These physiological features make the liver a suitable tissue to examine dietary-induced physiological shifts [
11,
12,
13]. For carnivorous fish like
S. chuatsi, which have evolved to thrive on high-lipid, high-protein prey, hepatic metabolism plays an even more pivotal role: it orchestrates the synthesis, oxidation, and storage of lipids, regulates glycogen turnover to maintain blood glucose stability, and mediates the biotransformation of xenobiotics (e.g., feed additives or environmental contaminants) [
14,
15]. Hepatic metabolism is also tightly linked to other physiological systems: for instance, liver-derived lipoproteins transport lipids to peripheral tissues, while hepatocyte-secreted proteins (e.g., albumin or clotting factors) support systemic homeostasis [
16,
17]. Notably, hepatic function is highly sensitive to dietary composition—small shifts in macronutrient ratios (e.g., protein–lipid balance) or micronutrient availability (e.g., vitamins or minerals) can trigger profound changes in metabolic flux, ranging from adaptive adjustments in enzyme activity to pathological states like hepatic steatosis (fatty liver disease) [
18,
19]. Given this centrality, understanding how artificial feeds alter hepatic metabolism in mandarin fish is essential for identifying the root causes of suboptimal performance and designing targeted feed improvements.
Metabolomics, a high-throughput analytical approach, has emerged as a powerful tool for deciphering systemic metabolic alterations in response to environmental or nutritional stimuli [
20,
21]. Metabolomics characterizes global small-molecule metabolite profiles and captures cellular metabolic states, bridging gene expression and phenotypic traits [
21]. Previous studies in aquaculture species, such as
Micropterus salmoides and
Ctenopharyngodon idella, have employed metabolomics to elucidate the impacts of diet on growth performance, lipid metabolism, and stress responses [
22,
23]. However, research focusing on carnivorous species like mandarin fish—especially regarding the hepatic adaptive responses to artificial feeds versus nature live feeds—remains scarce.
The mandarin fish (
Siniperca chuatsi), a carnivorous freshwater species native to East Asia, holds significant economic and ecological importance in China’s aquaculture industry [
6]. Renowned for its rapid growth rate, high market value, and nutritional benefits, mandarin fish farming has expanded rapidly over the past few decades [
9]. Prior studies on
S. chuatsi have explored growth metrics, digestive enzyme activities, muscle nutrient composition, and gut microbiota under different feeding regimes [
3,
5,
24]. Extensive research suggests that live-fed mandarin fish exhibit higher growth rates and feed conversion efficiency, potentially due to the high bioavailability of nutrients in live prey and stimulation of natural predatory behaviors, while artificial-fed fish often show signs of metabolic stress, including lipid accumulation, oxidative damage, and altered amino acid profiles [
25]. However, the association between hepatic metabolic reprogramming and histological lesions induced by artificial feeds remains poorly characterized. It is still unclear which hepatic metabolic pathways are primarily altered by artificial feed administration, and how these metabolic rearrangements are linked to hepatic structural damage. Elucidating these regulatory patterns is essential to understand the metabolic trade-offs between feeding strategies and guide targeted optimization of artificial feeds.
In this study, we employed untargeted metabolomics coupled with multivariate statistical analyses and histological observation to compare hepatic metabolic profiles and tissue morphology of S. chuatsi reared on live versus artificial feeds. We aimed to (1) identify key differences in hepatic metabolite profiles and tissue morphology between the two feeding regimes; (2) reveal core metabolic pathways and regulatory networks associated with hepatic steatosis induced by artificial feeds. The results will provide mechanistic insights into metabolic trade-offs between feeding strategies and inform targeted improvements in feed formulation, ultimately enhancing the sustainability and productivity of mandarin fish aquaculture.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animal Feeding Experiment
The experiment was conducted at a commercial fishery farm in Anhui, China, with a standardized mandarin fish culture system. A total of 800 homogenous-sized mandarin fish (152.4 ± 8.7 g) were randomly reared in 8 separate tanks (100 fish per tank), each four tanks designated as a distinct treatment group. Each tank functioned as an independent biological replicate with a separate water supply and independent feeding management. To avoid pseudoreplication, fish selected for subsequent histological and metabolomic assays were randomly sampled across different replicate tanks within each treatment. Fish in the NF group were reared on live
Cirrhinus mrigala (17.2% crude protein and 4.3% crude lipid, wet weight basis), while the AF group received artificial compound feed. The feed formulation was designed based on the nutritional requirements of mandarin fish reported in previous published studies [
26], and is consistent with the commercial feed commonly used in mandarin fish farming production. The feed was produced via industrial standardized processing, including ultrafine raw material crushing, proportional batching, uniform mixing, and high-temperature twin-screw extrusion molding [
26], which ensured stable nutrient uniformity and water resistance. The ingredient composition and proximate nutrient analysis of the artificial feed are shown in
Table 1.
The fish were fed to apparent satiation twice daily at 08:00 and 17:00 for 150 days. Throughout the experimental period, water quality parameters were maintained: water temperature was 28 ± 1 °C, dissolved oxygen was kept above 5.0 mg/L, and both nitrite and ammonia nitrogen were maintained below 0.1 mg/L. During the experiment, fish were maintained under a natural photoperiod and ambient water temperature (22–30 °C). Water quality parameters (dissolved oxygen ≥ 6 mg L−1, pH 7.0–7.5, ammonia nitrogen ≤ 0.2 mg L−1, nitrite ≤ 0.05 mg L−1) were monitored weekly. Survival rate was recorded daily, and calculated as (number of surviving fish at the end of the trial/initial number of fish) × 100%.
2.2. Sample Collection
At the end of the culture experiment, the experimental fish were starved for 24 h and anesthetized with tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222, 200 mg L−1; Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA). All fish were weighed and measured. Four fish per tank were randomly sampled for histological observation and metabolomic profiling. The abdominal cavity was opened immediately, and the whole liver was excised, rinsed with pre-cooled phosphate-buffered saline, and blotted dry with filter paper. Body length was measured with a digital vernier caliper (CD-12C, Mitutoyo, Kanagawa, Japan) to the nearest 0.1 cm. Body weights were determined using an electronic analytical balance (ACS-30, Haozhan, Kunshan Youkeweite Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) to the nearest 0.1 g. Liver weights were determined using an electronic analytical balance (YHM-30002, Yingheng, Huizhou Yingheng Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., Huizhou, China) to the nearest 0.01 g. The condition factor (CF) and hepatosomatic index (HSI) were calculated using the following formulas: CF = (body weight/body length3) × 100; HSI = (liver weight/body weight) × 100. A total of 500 mg liver samples were randomly collected from 16 fish per group: 8 samples were fixed in Bouin’s fixative (Phygene, Fujian, China) for histological observation, and the remaining 8 samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for subsequent metabolomic profiling.
2.3. Liver Histological Observation
Hepatic histological analysis for
S. chuatsi was performed following the protocol reported in the previous study [
27]. Briefly, the liver tissues were sequentially dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 100%) for 15 min per concentration, cleared in xylene (Bioisco, Jiangsu, China) for two 15 min cycles, infiltrated with paraffin, and cut into 5 μm thick sections. The sections were then subjected to hematoxylin–eosin (H&E) staining, with 5 min of hematoxylin (Bioisco, Jiangsu, China) staining followed by 3 min of eosin (Bioisco, Jiangsu, China) counterstaining [
28]. Tissue morphological features were observed and imaged using a light microscope (BX40F4, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
2.4. Metabolomic Profiling
Frozen tissue samples preserved at −80 °C were first thawed on an ice bath and homogenized under liquid nitrogen. For each 20 mg aliquot of homogenized sample, 400 μL of methanol/water mixture (7:3, v/v) spiked with internal standard was added. The mixture was vortexed at 1500 rpm for 5 min, incubated on ice for 15 min, and then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm and 4 °C for 10 min. A 300 μL aliquot of the supernatant was collected, kept at −20 °C for 30 min, and subjected to a second centrifugation at 12,000 rpm and 4 °C for 3 min. Ultimately, 200 μL of the supernatant was withdrawn for LC-MS analysis.
Metabolomic analysis was performed on a Vanquish Horizon UHPLC system coupled with an Orbitrap Exploris 120 mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), following an untargeted metabolomics workflow [
21,
29]. Both positive and negative electrospray ionization modes were applied to maximize metabolite coverage. For positive ion mode analysis, samples were eluted from a T3 column (Waters ACQUITY Premier HSS T3 Column 1.8 µm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm) using 0.1% formic acid in water (solvent A) (Adamas, Shanghai, China) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (solvent B) (Adamas, Shanghai, China) in the following gradient: 5 to 20% in 2 min, increased to 60% in the following 3 min, increased to 99% in 1 min and held for 1.5 min, then come back to 5% mobile phase B within 0.1 min, and held for 2.4 min. The analytical conditions were as follows, column temperature, 40 °C; flow rate, 0.4 mL/min; injection volume, 4 μL; the same elution gradient was applied for negative ion mode acquisition.
Mass spectrometric detection adopted a data-dependent acquisition mode that switched between full-scan MS and MSn events, with dynamic exclusion enabled. The instrument was operated in both positive and negative ionization mode, with full scan analysis over m/z 75-1000 at 35,000 resolution. Key MS settings were as follows: ion spray voltage, 3.5 kV (positive mode) and 3.2 kV (negative mode); sheath gas flow rate 30 arbitrary units (Arb); auxiliary gas flow rate 5 Arb; ion transfer tube temperature 320 °C; vaporizer temperature 300 °C; collision energy 30, 40, and 50 V; signal intensity threshold 1 × 106 counts per second (cps); top speed 10; and exclusion duration 3 s.
2.5. Metabolomic Analysis
All data preprocessing, statistical analysis and pathway enrichment were performed using the MetaboAnalyst 5.0 web platform (
https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/ (accessed on 10 April 2026)), following a standard untargeted metabolomics workflow [
29]. Raw peak intensity data were first processed via sum normalization, generalized logarithm transformation and auto-scaling to reduce systematic bias and improve data normality. Multivariate analysis (partial least squares-discriminant analysis, PLS-DA) and hierarchical clustering were then conducted to visualize global metabolic differences between the NF and AF groups. Differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs) between the two groups were screened using a dual threshold: variable importance in projection (VIP) score > 1 from the PLS-DA model, and
p < 0.05 after false discovery rate (FDR) correction in Student’s
t-test. Pathway enrichment analysis was performed by mapping DEMs to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway database integrated in MetaboAnalyst 5.0 web platform (
https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/ (accessed on 10 April 2026). The significance of each enriched pathway was quantified by the negative log-transformed
p-value (-log
p). A metabolic correlation network was constructed using Gephi software (version 0.10.1). Pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for all DEMs, and only correlations with |r| > 0.8 and
p < 0.05 were retained as significant edges for network visualization.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
Body length, body weight, CF, and HSI of mandarin fish are presented as mean ± standard error (SE). Each dataset was assessed for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test and homogeneity of variance using Levene’s test. For statistical analysis, independent samples t-test was performed using R (v3.6.1) to determine statistical significance between the AF and NF groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
4. Discussion
This study integrated growth performance, liver histological structure, and hepatic metabolomic data to reveal the differences in hepatic metabolic adaptation between mandarin fish fed artificial feeds (AF) and natural live feeds (NF). The present findings demonstrate that while artificial feeds maintain growth comparable to live prey, they trigger extensive hepatic lipid metabolism reprogramming and pathological structural changes represented by hepatic steatosis. These findings shed light on the metabolic adaptations underlying the successful transition from live prey to artificial feeds, with implications for improving aquaculture practices.
4.1. Dissociated Phenotypes of Growth and Hepatic Health
In the present study, the most prominent phenotypic difference was the significant increase in HSI in the AF group, despite no significant changes in body length, body weight, and condition factor between the two groups. This dissociated phenotype indicates that artificial feeds support normal growth but might cause liver-specific metabolic overload. This finding, combined with histological observations of severe cytoplasmic vacuolization and loose arrangement of hepatocytes in the AF group, indicates that the increase in liver weight is attributed to both enhanced hepatic metabolic activity and excessive lipid accumulation. This pattern indicates that artificial feeds do not alter overall growth (i.e., body size and condition factor), but redirect nutritional resources toward hepatic metabolism. This observation matches the physiological function of livers: the organ prioritizes processing and storing surplus dietary nutrients [
12].
Consistent with our growth results, previous work on mandarin fish has repeatedly found comparable growth rates between artificial feed and live prey groups, despite clear differences at the physiological and molecular levels. For instance, research has reported altered digestive enzyme activities and shifted intestinal microflora in artificial-fed mandarin fish hybrids relative to live prey-fed counterparts, even with similar body weight gain [
5]. Further research has revealed that domestication to artificial feeds induced adaptive remodeling of the entire digestive tract in mandarin fish, including changes in intestinal morphology and digestive enzyme secretion patterns [
9]. Our findings extend these prior observations from the digestive system to the liver, revealing that hepatic metabolic remodeling is another key component of the adaptive response to artificial feeds.
Similar phenotypes have been widely reported in other carnivorous fish species. In
Epinephelus coioides, high dietary coconut oil replacing fish oil significantly promoted hepatic lipid deposition without affecting growth performance and body condition [
32]. In
Pelteobagrus vachelli and
Lates calcarifer, dietary manipulation of lipid sources or nutrient levels also induced remarkable hepatic metabolic alterations and steatosis, but left growth and condition factor unchanged [
33,
34]. This pattern verifies that excess lipid is preferentially deposited in the liver rather than peripheral somatic tissues. As the core metabolic hub for nutrient processing, the liver first stores surplus nutrients from artificial feeds as metabolic reserves; systemic fat deposition only occurs when hepatic storage capacity is saturated [
11,
12]. By contrast, live prey feeding leads to more balanced nutrient allocation across somatic tissues, thus supporting comparable growth with lower hepatic mass [
35].
4.2. Metabolic Flexibility Under Live Prey Feeding
The clear separation of hepatic metabolomic profiles between the AF and NF groups in PLS-DA analysis confirms that dietary type is a key driver of the hepatic metabolic phenotype of mandarin fish. Metabolic correlation network analysis further revealed that amino acid and lipid metabolism form tightly linked functional modules in the liver of mandarin fish, indicating that the adaptation to artificial feeds involves the synergistic regulation of multiple metabolic pathways, rather than independent changes in individual metabolites. Live prey feeding is characterized by fluctuating nutrient intake and predation-associated energy expenditure, which requires high adaptive capacity of the liver to maintain energy homeostasis. In the NF group, we observed coordinated upregulation of multiple energy metabolism intermediates, including the tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediate α-ketoglutarate, glycolytic intermediate PEP, and gluconeogenic substrate L-alanine. This metabolic profile indicates enhanced central carbon metabolism flux and active gluconeogenesis, which enables the liver to rapidly regulate blood glucose levels in response to intermittent food intake from live prey. At the transcriptomic level, artificial feed altered the expression of genes related to stress response and energy metabolism in the intestine of mandarin fish, which aligns with the metabolic shifts observed in our liver samples [
36].
This adaptive pattern is consistent with the FoxO signaling pathway activation observed in the NF group. FoxO transcription factors are core regulators of cellular stress resistance and energy metabolism, which can upregulate gluconeogenesis and fatty acid oxidation to maintain energy supply during nutritional fluctuations [
37,
38]. Meanwhile, the significant elevation of cortisol and GABA in the NF group further supports the activation of stress adaptation mechanisms. Cortisol is the primary glucocorticoid in fish, which promotes hepatic gluconeogenesis and lipid mobilization under stress conditions [
39]. GABA, as an inhibitory neurotransmitter, is involved in regulating stress response and feeding behavior. Together, these metabolic changes reflect the adaptive flexibility of the mandarin fish liver, which enables efficient adaptation to the variable nutritional environment of live prey feeding [
15].
4.3. Hepatic Lipid Metabolism Reprogramming Induced by Artificial Feeds
The AF group showed comprehensive upregulation of lipid metabolism pathways and accumulation of multiple lipid metabolites, which is the core metabolic feature of artificial feed-induced hepatic steatosis. Phosphatidylcholine is a core component of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) responsible for hepatic lipid transport, and its upregulation may be a compensatory response to excessive hepatic lipid accumulation; meanwhile ceramide, as a bioactive lipid mediator, is closely associated with the progression of hepatic steatosis and inflammatory response [
39,
40]. Ceramide accumulation can induce hepatocyte apoptosis and promote the progression of fatty liver disease to steatohepatitis. The elevation of leukotriene B4, a pro-inflammatory eicosanoid, further indicates the presence of inflammatory activation in the liver of the AF group. These findings suggest that artificial feed-induced steatosis is not merely a passive lipid storage process, but is accompanied by active lipid signaling regulation and inflammatory response, which may pose long-term risks to liver function and fish health.
KEGG pathway enrichment analysis further clarified the core regulatory pathways of hepatic metabolic adaptation to artificial feeds. The AF group showed significant activation of multiple lipid metabolism-related pathways, including arachidonic acid metabolism, α-linolenic acid metabolism, glycerolipid metabolism, linoleic acid metabolism, fatty acid elongation, and glycerophospholipid metabolism. These pathways are not only involved in the synthesis and catabolism of structural and storage lipids, but also closely related to the regulation of inflammatory response and membrane fluidity in fish liver [
30,
31]. However, the continuous activation of these lipid synthesis pathways also leads to excessive lipid deposition in hepatocytes, which ultimately induces hepatic steatosis, forming a “metabolic adaptation–lipid overload–structural damage” cascade response.
4.4. Drivers of Phenotypic Differences: Nutrient Composition vs. Feed State
An important consideration is that the observed differences between groups may arise from two aspects: the difference in nutrient composition (higher protein and lipid levels in AF on a wet weight basis) and the difference in feed state (live prey vs. formulated feed, including physical form, palatability, and predation energy cost).
In terms of nutrient composition, the artificial feed had much higher protein and lipid concentrations on a wet weight basis than live prey. However, on a dry matter basis, the protein and lipid levels of the artificial feed are within the range commonly used for carnivorous fish feeds, and are consistent with previous studies on mandarin fish artificial feeds [
9]. The higher water content of live prey leads to lower nutrient concentration per unit wet weight, but fish can compensate by increasing prey intake. In this study, both groups were fed to apparent satiation, and the comparable growth performance suggests that the actual nutrient intake for growth was similar between groups.
In terms of feed state, live prey feeding requires predation behavior, which increases energy expenditure and metabolic stress, as reflected by the upregulation of cortisol and FoxO pathway in the NF group. In contrast, artificial feeds are easily ingested, reducing the energy cost of predation and allowing more nutrients to be used for metabolism and storage. The stable nutrient supply of artificial feeds also reduces the need for metabolic flexibility, leading to a shift in hepatic metabolism toward lipid synthesis and storage. Beyond energy expenditure and nutrient stability, differences in intestinal microbial communities may also contribute to the observed metabolic divergence. Previous studies have demonstrated that mandarin fish fed artificial feeds had significantly different gut microbiota composition compared to those fed live prey, with higher abundance of lipid-metabolizing bacterial taxa [
36,
41]. Shifts in gut microbiota can alter nutrient extraction efficiency and modulate hepatic lipid metabolism via the gut–liver axis, which may act as an additional driver of hepatic steatosis under artificial feeding.
Overall, the observed hepatic metabolic differences are the combined result of both nutrient composition and feed state. This study reflects the actual production scenario of mandarin fish farming, and the findings have direct practical relevance. Future studies using isonitrogenous and isolipidic diets can further separate the independent effects of nutrient level and feed physical state.
4.5. Implications for Artificial Feed Optimization
These findings have important guiding significance for the optimization of artificial feed formulations for mandarin fish. The significant activation of hepatic lipid synthesis pathways and the occurrence of steatosis in the AF group indicate that the lipid level and fatty acid composition of the current commercial feed do not fully match the metabolic capacity of mandarin fish. Adjusting the dietary protein-to-lipid ratio, optimizing the fatty acid profile, and adding functional additives that promote lipid transport and oxidation may alleviate excessive hepatic lipid deposition while maintaining normal growth performance [
42]. Additionally, the non-significant difference in growth between the two groups suggests that adjusting the macronutrient ratio of artificial feeds may redirect nutrients from hepatic storage to growth, thereby improving feed efficiency and production performance. It should be emphasized that although artificial feeds induce hepatic steatosis, they still have obvious advantages in terms of production cost, biosecurity, and operational convenience, and remain the development direction of sustainable mandarin fish aquaculture. The key is to optimize feed formulation and feeding strategies based on metabolic mechanisms to achieve a balance between growth performance and hepatic health.