Effects of Strontium Marking on Otolith Elemental Deposition, Digestive Enzymes, and Antioxidant System in Juvenile Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus)
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design
2.2. Biological Measurement and Tissue Collection
2.3. Otolith Preparation
2.4. Trace Element Analysis
2.5. Enzyme Activity Assays
2.6. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Effect of Sr Marking
3.2. Effects of Sr on the Growth of P. olivaceus
3.3. Effects of Sr on Digestive Enzyme Activity
3.4. Effects of Sr on Antioxidant Enzyme Activity
4. Discussion
4.1. Otolith Sr/Ca Ratio as an Elemental Fingerprint for Marking Identification
4.2. Effects of Strontium Marking on Growth and Survival
4.3. Effects of Strontium Marking on Digestive Enzyme Activity
4.4. Effects of Strontium Marking on Antioxidant Enzyme Activity
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Liu, M.H.; Chen, B.; Luo, H.Z.; Fu, R.B.; Luo, H.J. Preliminary Study on Artificial Breeding Technique of Paralichthys olivaceus Caught from Zhoushan Area. Fish. Inf. Strategy 2006, 21, 24–26. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, G.D.; Zhang, X.M.; Gao, T.X. The enhancement experiment of Paralichthys olivaceus in Shandong Weihai. Trans. Oceanol. Limnol. 2000, 4, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, H.Z.; Chen, B.; Gu, Y.C.; Sun, Z.W. Primary Study on Farming Paralichthys oliyacens (Temminck et Schlegel) with Shrimp and Crab in the Pond in Zhoushan. Fish. Inf. Strategy 2005, 20, 27–29. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.; Zhang, B.L.; Guo, B.; Jiang, T.; Chen, W.; Yang, J.; Gao, Y.; Zeng, X.X. Study of the Feasibility of Identifying the Group of Released Liza haematocheila by Using the Strontium Marking Method in Otoliths. Prog. Fish. Sci. 2022, 43, 38–45. [Google Scholar]
- Pan, J. Application of Otolith Microstructure and Microchemistry Analysisi to Stock Identification of Sliver Carp from the Yangtze River, Ganjiang River and Poyang Lake. Master’s Thesis, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, O.R.; Ganio, K.; Roberts, B.R.; Swearer, S.E. Trace element-protein interactions in endolymph from the inner ear of fish: Implications for environmental reconstructions using fish otolith chemistry. Metallomics 2017, 9, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serre, S.H.; Nielsen, K.E.; Fink-Jensen, P.; Thomsen, T.B.; Hüssy, K. Analysis of cod otolith microchemistry by continuous line transects using LA-ICP-MS. Geol. Surv. Den. Greenl. Bull. 2018, 41, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, Z.; Song, D.; Zhang, H.; Liang, L.; Zhang, C.; Jiang, T.; Zhu, F.; Xiong, Y. Exploring the drivers of otolith Sr/Ca during the early life stages of Larimichthys polyactis: Insights from cultured and wild populations. Front. Mar. Sci. 2025, 12, 1513070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Z.Y.; Liu, M.Z.; Shan, X.L.; Jiang, R.J.; Yin, R.; Li, Z.H.; Jiang, T.; Zhu, S.L.; Wang, H.R.; Shen, J.R. Habitat use history of Coilia nusus in Oujiang River Estuary based on otolith microchemistry. J. Fish. China 2025, 49, 079308. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, Y.H.; Jiang, T.; Chen, X.B.; Liu, H.B.; Yang, J. Characterization of strontium markers and validation of daily increment formation for three otolith types in larval grass carp(Ctenopharyngodon idellus). J. Fish. Sci. China 2024, 31, 640–651. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Z.C.; Hu, W.J.; Feng, G.P.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, Y.P. Strontium labeling technique for otolith of Myxocyprinus asiaticus based on immersion method. Chin. Fish. Qual. Stand. 2024, 14, 22–27. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, C.; Zhang, M.Y.; Zheng, C.F.; Zhang, X.Y.; Chen, C.; Shao, X.B.; Zhao, W.H.; Liu, W.C. Otolith strontium marking of juvenile Liza haematocheila. Chin. J. Ecol. 2024, 43, 975–981. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, L.L.; Zhang, H.; Feng, G.P.; Liu, Y.; Han, Z.Q.; Zhao, F.; Ye, Q.; Hu, W.J.; Song, C. Evaluation of the effectiveness of marking juvenile Takifugu obscurus otoliths with strontium. Fishes 2022, 7, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, C.W.; Zhang, H.; Ben, C.K.; Yuan, J.M.; Hu, H.S.; Xiao, Y.Y. Study on Marked Release and Effect Evaluation of Larimichthys crocea in Coastal Areas of Jiangsu Province. J. Aquac. 2023, 44, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Q.Y.; Xie, X.J. The effect of waterbome lead on antioxidative responses stress in tissue and neurotoxic in brain on embryonic and larval development of Silurus meridionalis Chen. Freshw. Fish. 2018, 48, 97–105. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, D.M.; Gong, S.L.; Li, Y.W.; Chen, Q.L. Cadmium Induces Histological Damage and Oxidative Stress in the Liver of Zebrafish. J. Chongqing Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2018, 35, 31–36+2. [Google Scholar]
- Ma’rifah, F.; Saputri, M.R.; Soegianto, A.; Irawan, B.; Putranto, T.W.C. The change of metallothionein and oxidative response in gills of the Oreochromis niloticus after exposure to copper. Animals 2019, 9, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, H.J.; Zhuang, P.; Gao, L.J. Advances on the studies of the effect of ecological factors on activities of digestive enzymes of fish. Mar. Fish. 2006, 28, 158–162. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.X.; Gao, Y.T.; Wu, H.X.; Wang, Z.G.; Wang, Y.H.; Zhou, C.S.; Hu, Y. Changes of digestive enzyme activity of Tegillarca granosa exposed to cadmium and copper. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2013, 33, 7690–7698. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, H.X.; Kong, X.H.; Wang, S.P.; Guo, H.Y. Effect of copper on growth, digestive and antioxidant enzyme activities of juvenile Qihe crucian carp, Carassius carassius, during exposure and recovery. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2016, 96, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricker, W.E. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull. Fish. Res. Board Can. 1975, 191, 1–382. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.S.; Hu, Z.C.; Zong, K.Q.; Gao, C.G.; Gao, S.; Xu, J.; Chen, H.H. Reappraisement and refinement of zircon U-Pb isotope and trace element analyses by LA-ICP-MS. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2010, 55, 1535–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu-Saleem, M.A.; Al-Zyoud, M.F.; Al-Harbi, M.A. A Comparative Evaluation of Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) and ChatGPT-4 in Statistical Analyses. Cureus 2024, 16, e73380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maxwell, S.E.; Delaney, H.D. Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective, 2nd ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Seifert, E. OriginPro 9.1: Scientific Data Analysis and Graphing Software—Software Review. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2014, 54, 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Campana, S.E. Chemistry and composition of fish otoliths: Pathways, mechanisms and applications. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1999, 188, 263–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dou, S.Z.; Yokouchi, K.; Yu, X.; Cao, L.; Kuroki, M.; Otake, T.; Tsukamoto, K. The migratory history of anadromous and non-anadromous tapertail anchovy Coilia nasus in the Yangtze River Estuary revealed by the otolith Sr:Ca ratio. Environ. Biol. Fishes 2012, 95, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Secor, D.H.; Henderson-Arzapalo, A.; Piccoli, P.M. Can otolith microchemistry chart patterns of migration and habitat utilization in anadromous fishes? J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1995, 192, 15–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, C.; Jiang, T.; Chen, X.B.; Liu, H.B.; Yang, J. Effectiveness of otolith strontium marking for juvenile Cyprinus carpio. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2019, 30, 2093–2100. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, C.; Jiang, T.; Chen, X.B.; Liu, H.B.; Yang, J. Persistence evaluation of strontium marking on otoliths in larvae common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Hubei Agric. Sci. 2021, 60, 114–117. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, C.; Jiang, T.; Chen, X.B.; Liu, H.B.; Yang, J. Characteristics of otolith strontium marking and its time lags of larval Cyprinus carpio. Oceanol. Limnol. Sin. 2019, 50, 903–912. [Google Scholar]
- Hwang, P.P.; Tung, Y.C.; Chang, M.H. Effect of environmental calcium levels on calcium uptake in tilapia larvae Oreochromis mossambicus. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 1996, 15, 363–370. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, B.; Zhang, B.L.; Wang, S.; Zheng, D.B.; Zeng, X.X.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, J.W. Effect of seawater strontium concentration on enzymes involved in metabolism and immunity of Liza haematocheila during otolith strontium marking. Mar. Fish. 2024, 46, 628–637. [Google Scholar]
- Bo, H.Y.; Feng, J.D.; Zhang, X.H.; Wang, W.T.; Li, Q.; Liu, L.; He, C.Y.; Tian, L.X. Research on the mechanism of enrichment and excretion of strontium ions in Danio rerio. Radiat. Prot. 2024, 44, 46–52. [Google Scholar]
- Song, H.J.; Liu, W.; Wang, J.L.; Tang, F.J. Effects of Strontium Ion on Growth and ATPase Activity in Muscle of Chum Salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) Juveniles. Chin. J. Fish. 2013, 26, 23–28. [Google Scholar]
- Klaczek, C.E.; Saari, G.N.; Veilleux, H.D.; Mielewczyk, D.A.; Goss, G.G.; Glover, C.N. Acute waterborne strontium exposure to rainbow trout: Tissue accumulation, ionoregulatory effects, and the modifying influence of waterborne calcium. Aquat. Toxicol. 2022, 245, 106125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Livingstone, D. Contaminant-stimulated reactive oxygen species production and oxidative damage in aquatic organisms. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2001, 42, 656–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Winston, G.W.; Di Giulio, R.T. Prooxidant and antioxidant mechanisms in aquatic organisms. Aquat. Toxicol. 1991, 19, 137–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valavanidis, A.; Vlahogianni, T.; Dassenakis, M.; Scoullos, M. Molecular biomarkers of oxidative stress in aquatic organisms in relation to toxic environmental pollutants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2006, 64, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sies, H. Oxidative stress: A concept in redox biology and medicine. Redox Biol. 2015, 4, 180–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Z.; Xu, M.; Cao, Q.; Chi, W.; Cao, S.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, Y. Antioxidant Systematic Alteration Was Responsible for Injuries Inflicted on the Marine Blue Mussel Mytilus edulis Following Strontium Exposure. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lushchak, V.I. Environmentally induced oxidative stress in aquatic animals. Aquat. Toxicol. 2011, 101, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Q.L.; Fu, S.J.; Hou, Y.T.; Yang, S.; Tang, Z.H. Hypoxia and reoxygenation induced distinct patterns of response in antioxidant capacity between two cyprinid fish species. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2025, 310, 111928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J.M. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, 3rd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, C.; Liu, W.; Zhan, P.R.; Wang, J.L.; Li, P.L. Exogenous Sr2+ sedimentation on otolith of chum salmon embryos. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2015, 26, 3189–3194. [Google Scholar]
- Si, F.; Wang, Q.L.; Yu, Q.H.; Liu, H.B.; Jiang, T.; Yang, J.; Wang, J. Use of Strontium Chloride in Otolith Marking of Japanese Flounder. Prog. Fish. Sci. 2019, 40, 65–72. [Google Scholar]









| Parameter | Value | Parameter | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wavelength | 150 nm | RF power | 1350 W |
| Energy density | 7.0 J/cm3 | Plasma gas flow rate | 15 L/min |
| Carrier gas | Helium (He, 0.65 L/min) | Auxiliary gas flow rate | 1 L/min |
| Ablation spot diameter | 40 μm | Make-up gas flow rate | 0.7 L/min |
| Repetition rate | 10 Hz | Sampling depth | 5 nm |
| Ablation mode | Linear/constant speed scan | Detector mode | Dual |
| Marking Treatment Method | Body Length (mm)/Body Weight (g) | ANOVA | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 mg/L | 20 mg/L | 40 mg/L | 80 mg/L | F | p | η2p | |||
| Marking stage | Marking treatment group | 2d | 67.8 ± 8.75/ 1.81 ± 0.72 | 74.2 ± 6.87/ 2.37 ± 0.57 | 63.2 ± 8.34/ 54.0 ± 16.8 | 69.6 ± 5.5/ 1.97 ± 0.28 | 1.289/ 2.557 | 0.260/ 0.120 | 0.023/ 0.037 |
| 4d | 66.2 ± 6.34/ 1.89 ± 0.22 | 71.6 ± 7.19/ 2.19 ± 0.91 | 71.6 ± 6.26/ 2.54 ± 0.58 | 72.2 ± 6.53/ 2.64 ± 0.78 | |||||
| 8d | 73.6 ± 6.76/ 2.58 ± 0.47 | 72.4 ± 6.8/ 2.36 ± 0.47 | 67.6 ± 6.18/ 1.95 ± 0.67 | 66.6 ± 3.84/ 2.03 ± 0.31 | |||||
| Control group | 72.25 ± 6.44/2.14 ± 0.59 | ||||||||
| Recovery stage | Marking treatment group | 2d | 68.3 ± 7.57/ 1.89 ± 0.37 | 77 ± 1.21/ 2.49 ± 0.22 | 75.1 ± 4.1/ 2.37 ± 0.28 | 77.3 ± 4.04/ 2.58 ± 0.49 | 1.673/ 2.099 | 0.140/ 0.101 | 0.043/ 0.059 |
| 4d | 65.6 ± 3.51/ 1.91 ± 0.20 | 80.6 ± 5.5/ 2.69 ± 0.41 | 74.6 ± 4.04/ 2.21 ± 0.19 | 75.2 ± 11.53/ 2.56 ± 1.14 | |||||
| 8d | 74.33 ± 1.52/ 2.39 ± 0.27 | 70.1 ± 7.01/ 1.92 ± 0.19 | 72.6 ± 1.71/ 2.36 ± 0.82 | 68.3 ± 5.5/ 1.80 ± 0.11 | |||||
| Control group | 73 ± 9.01/2.4 ± 0.66 | ||||||||
| Marking Treatment Method | Condition Factor | ANOVA | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 mg/L | 20 mg/L | 40 mg/L | 80 mg/L | F | p | η2p | |||
| Marking stage | Marking treatment group | 2d | 0.66 ± 0.12 | 0.50 ± 0.11 | 0.48 ± 0.12 | 0.66 ± 0.21 | 1.586 | 0.134 | 0.027 |
| 4d | 0.57 ± 0.13 | 0.58 ± 0.13 | 0.60 ± 0.50 | 0.65 ± 0.17 | |||||
| 8d | 0.50 ± 0.05 | 0.68 ± 0.01 | 0.68 ± 0.58 | 0.69 ± 0.14 | |||||
| Control group | 0.56 ± 0.1 | ||||||||
| Recovery stage | Marking treatment group | 2d | 0.59 ± 0.84 | 0.54 ± 0.16 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0.50 ± 0.11 | 1.568 | 0.116 | 0.031 |
| 4d | 0.55 ± 0.24 | 0.51 ± 0.63 | 0.59 ± 0.11 | 0.64 ± 0.02 | |||||
| 8d | 0.68 ± 0.12 | 0.53 ± 0.59 | 0.58 ± 0.78 | 0.50 ± 0.21 | |||||
| Control group | 0.62 ± 0.13 | ||||||||
| Enzyme | Time | ANOVA Values | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marking Period | Recovery Period | ||||||
| F | p | η2p | F | p | η2p | ||
| Pepsin | 2d | 4.429 | 0.041 | 0.624 | 0.613 | 0.625 | 0.187 |
| 4d | 0.382 | 0.769 | 0.125 | 0.830 | 0.514 | 0.237 | |
| 8d | 1.063 | 0.417 | 0.285 | 0.638 | 0.612 | 0.193 | |
| Trypsin | 2d | 2.833 | 0.106 | 0.515 | 1.784 | 0.228 | 0.401 |
| 4d | 0.789 | 0.533 | 0.228 | 1.640 | 0.256 | 0.381 | |
| 8d | 0.639 | 0.611 | 0.193 | 0.318 | 0.812 | 0.107 | |
| α-Amylase | 2d | 2.440 | 0.139 | 0.478 | 1.455 | 0.298 | 0.353 |
| 4d | 1.303 | 0.339 | 0.328 | 2.948 | 0.098 | 0.525 | |
| 8d | 2.389 | 0.143 | 0.474 | 0.887 | 0.488 | 0.250 | |
| Lipase | 2d | 0.306 | 0.821 | 0.103 | 0.563 | 0.654 | 0.174 |
| 4d | 1.635 | 0.257 | 0.380 | 0.533 | 0.672 | 0.167 | |
| 8d | 0.881 | 0.491 | 0.248 | 2.665 | 0.119 | 0.500 | |
| Enzyme | Time | ANOVA Values | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marking Period | Recovery Period | ||||||
| F | p | η2p | F | p | η2p | ||
| T-AOC | 2d | 0.423 | 0.742 | 0.137 | 4.720 | 0.035 | 0.639 |
| 4d | 1.039 | 0.426 | 0.280 | 1.126 | 0.395 | 0.297 | |
| 8d | 0.372 | 0.776 | 0.122 | 0.448 | 0.726 | 0.144 | |
| CAT | 2d | 0.398 | 0.758 | 0.130 | 0.206 | 0.890 | 0.072 |
| 4d | 0.229 | 0.874 | 0.079 | 1.147 | 0.387 | 0.301 | |
| 8d | 2.169 | 0.170 | 0.449 | 0.364 | 0.781 | 0.120 | |
| GHS-Px | 2d | 0.822 | 0.517 | 0.236 | 2.940 | 0.099 | 0.524 |
| 4d | 0.821 | 0.518 | 0.235 | 1.528 | 0.280 | 0.364 | |
| 8d | 0.959 | 0.457 | 0.265 | 0.170 | 0.914 | 0.060 | |
| SOD | 2d | 5.260 | 0.027 | 0.664 | 0.096 | 0.960 | 0.035 |
| 4d | 1.657 | 0.252 | 0.383 | 0.800 | 0.528 | 0.231 | |
| 8d | 0.507 | 0.688 | 0.160 | 6.751 | 0.014 | 0.717 | |
| MDA | 2d | 3.843 | 0.057 | 0.590 | 0.668 | 0.595 | 0.200 |
| 4d | 0.239 | 0.866 | 0.082 | 1.852 | 0.216 | 0.410 | |
| 8d | 0.966 | 0.454 | 0.266 | 0.587 | 0.640 | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, T.; Li, J.; Yang, J.; Wang, Y. Effects of Strontium Marking on Otolith Elemental Deposition, Digestive Enzymes, and Antioxidant System in Juvenile Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Fishes 2026, 11, 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11050306
Zhang J, Li S, Zhang J, Zhang J, Li T, Li J, Yang J, Wang Y. Effects of Strontium Marking on Otolith Elemental Deposition, Digestive Enzymes, and Antioxidant System in Juvenile Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Fishes. 2026; 11(5):306. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11050306
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Jiahui, Siyang Li, Jun Zhang, Jinming Zhang, Tianyi Li, Jianhua Li, Jun Yang, and Yan Wang. 2026. "Effects of Strontium Marking on Otolith Elemental Deposition, Digestive Enzymes, and Antioxidant System in Juvenile Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus)" Fishes 11, no. 5: 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11050306
APA StyleZhang, J., Li, S., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Li, T., Li, J., Yang, J., & Wang, Y. (2026). Effects of Strontium Marking on Otolith Elemental Deposition, Digestive Enzymes, and Antioxidant System in Juvenile Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Fishes, 11(5), 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11050306

