Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
(Mind)-Reading Maps
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
How to Make Correct Predictions in False Belief Tasks without Attributing False Beliefs: An Analysis of Alternative Inferences and How to Avoid Them
Open AccessArticle

Cajal’s Law of Dynamic Polarization: Mechanism and Design

Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Instituto de Filosofía “Dr. Alejandro Korn”, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, PO 1406, Argentina
Philosophies 2018, 3(2), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies3020011
Received: 8 February 2018 / Revised: 9 April 2018 / Accepted: 11 April 2018 / Published: 16 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Philosophy of Cognitive Science: Selected Papers from WPCS 2017)
Santiago Ramón y Cajal, the primary architect of the neuron doctrine and the law of dynamic polarization, is considered to be the founder of modern neuroscience. At the same time, many philosophers, historians, and neuroscientists agree that modern neuroscience embodies a mechanistic perspective on the explanation of the nervous system. In this paper, I review the extant mechanistic interpretation of Cajal’s contribution to modern neuroscience. Then, I argue that the extant mechanistic interpretation fails to capture the explanatory import of Cajal’s law of dynamic polarization. My claim is that the definitive formulation of Cajal’s law of dynamic polarization, despite its mechanistic inaccuracies, embodies a non-mechanistic pattern of reasoning (i.e., design explanation) that is an integral component of modern neuroscience. View Full-Text
Keywords: Cajal; law of dynamic polarization; mechanism; utility; design Cajal; law of dynamic polarization; mechanism; utility; design
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Barberis, S.D. Cajal’s Law of Dynamic Polarization: Mechanism and Design. Philosophies 2018, 3, 11.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop