Review Reports
- Na Li1,2,3,
- Daojing Lin1,2,3 and
- Junfeng Wu1,2,3
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: José Ricardo De Arruda Miranda Reviewer 3: Sajjad Mohammadi
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The manuscript is very clear and features an improved externally magnetic field controlled rbot system with new features and increased abilities.
Minor comments
Need to further discuss what are the limitations or drawback of C-MCR
Delivery the system does it, but it doesn't deliver – how do they release the drug? Continuously or with some trigger?
Repeated words – for exemple line 1 introduction
Although the experiments are carried out in an ex-vivo environment, it would be important, as a proof concept, to present some in vivo measurement. But this does not prevent the authors from presenting the paper.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
The paper looks interesting but unfortunately and do not have any close expertise to comment on the novelty of the paper, so i would suggest the editor to count on the other reviewer's comment.
The paper looks interesting but unfortunately and do not have any close expertise to comment on the novelty of the paper, so i would suggest the editor to count on the other reviewer's comment.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Thanks for addressing the comments. Accept in present form.