Next Article in Journal
Effect of ZrO2 Content on Microstructure Evolution and Sintering Properties of (Tb0.7Lu0.3)2O3 Magneto-Optic Transparent Ceramics
Previous Article in Journal
Magnetic Semiconductors as Materials for Spintronics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Magnetochemistry
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/magnetochemistry8120174
magnetochemistry-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Green Synthesis of Unsaturated Fatty Acid Mediated Magnetite Nanoparticles and Their Structural and Magnetic Studies

by
Amlan Kumar Das
1,*,
Apoorva Fanan
2,
Daoud Ali
3,
Vijendra Singh Solanki
1,*,
Brijesh Pare
4,
Bader O. Almutairi
3,
Neha Agrawal
5,
Neera Yadav
6,
Vikram Pareek
1 and
Virendra Kumar Yadav
7,*
1
Department of Chemistry, School of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Sikar 332311, India
2
Department of Nanoscience and Technology, School of Engineering and Technology, Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Sikar 332311, India
3
Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Chemistry, Govt. Madhav Science, PG College, Vikram University, Ujjain 456001, India
5
Department of Chemistry, Navyug Kanya Mahavidyalaya, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226004, India
6
College of Pharmacy, Gachon University, Incheon 21999, Republic of Korea
7
Department of Biosciences, School of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Sikar 332311, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Magnetochemistry 2022, 8(12), 174; https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry8120174
Submission received: 17 October 2022 / Revised: 24 November 2022 / Accepted: 28 November 2022 / Published: 30 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Magnetic Oxide Nanoparticles/Composites)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The green, cost-effective and sustainable synthesis of nanomaterials has been a key concern of scientists and researchers. In this view, MNPs were prepared using a sapota plant leaf extract and the surface of the magnetite nanoparticles was engineered with unsaturated fatty acids. The first report on the effect of unsaturation on the size and magnetic properties of magnetite nanoparticles (MNPs), prepared by the co-precipitation method, has been studied by coating surfactants on MNPs based on their unsaturation from zero to three (lauric acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid). The size effect and magnetic properties of MNPs coated with a surfactant have been studied in comparison with uncoated magnetite nanoparticles. After the surface modification of the magnetite particle, it is necessary to check whether the magnetic property has been restored or not. Therefore, the magnetic property was studied. The presence of a surfactant on the surface of MNPs was confirmed by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), which was later confirmed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The atomic structure was studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and the size of uncoated and surfactant-coated MNPs was determined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and the Scherrer equation by following XRD data. The magnetization property was analyzed by a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) at 10, 100 and 300 K and both bared and surfactant-coated MNPs exhibited a superparamagnetic nature at room temperature. The saturation magnetization (Ms) study shows that MNPs coated with a surfactant have a lower saturation magnetization value in comparison to uncoated NPs, confirming surface layering. Because the magnetic fluid has been stabilized in the aqueous medium, the double-layer model is expected to prevail.

1. Introduction

The synthesis of nanomaterials via different methods and their utilization in various fields of science and technology has yielded a revolution in the industrial and manufacturing sectors. Due to their unique properties, such as electrical, magnetic [1,2], and optical properties, these metal oxide NPs are tremendously used in material science, engineering, and even in medical sciences [3].
MNPs (Fe3O4) show unique properties, such as being eco-friendly, stable, and biodegradable, having a high surface area, and being cost-effective and biocompatible in nature. These are used as a catalyst for the degradation of organic toxic pollutants from the environment and the separation of biomaterials [4,5,6].
Due to their higher hydrophilicity, MNPs have some limitations, such as being coagulated in an aqueous medium and oxidized in the air, as well as having instability in the acidic medium and less extraction capacity. In this view, to overcome the weaknesses of MNPs, their surface can be saturated and modified by monocarboxylic fatty acids, which are byproducts of the different vegetable oils and hydrocarbons available from the purifications of the oils [7].
Surfactants have unique properties to prevent MNPs from aggregating and they can be used to stabilize the magnetism of MNPs in aqueous and non-aqueous mediums by surface modification from the surfactants.
Coating with surfactants reduces NPs’ agglomeration by forming a covering layer on the surface of MNPs. In that layer, a hydrophilic head will stick to the hydrophilic magnetite nanoparticles through covalently bonded chemical adsorption, leaving the tail to the aqueous medium, which eventually stabilizes by double-layer formation through physical adsorption, leaving the hydrophilic head of the carboxylate anion to face the aqueous medium. This results in the bilayered structure of the surfactant–magnetite nanoparticle hybrid [8].
In this research paper, four fatty acids (lauric acid or dodecanoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid and linolenic acid) have been used for the saturation of the MNPs surface. Figure 1 shows the MNPs coated with fatty acids.

2. Materials and Methods

All the chemicals, including FeCl3·6H2O, FeSO4·4H2O, ethanol, ammonia and fatty acids for the synthesis of coated MNPs were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Chemical Pvt. Ltd. and Merck chemicals. (Sigma Aldrich Chemical Pvt. Ltd. and Merck chemicals., Bangalore, Karnataka, India). The standard solution was prepared with double-distilled water.

Synthesis of MNPs

Magnetite nanoparticles (Fe3O4) were synthesized by following the co-precipitation method from the sapota plant leaf extract [9,10,11,12]. MNPs were coated with an unsaturated fatty acid, forming a double layer and giving rise to colloidal and magnetic stability to the magnetite nanoparticle. Sapota plant leaf was collected from the university campus, dried and boiled with 100 mL of distilled water for 1 h. The aqueous solution was filtered, and the extracts were used for further synthesis of the magnetite nanoparticles. The ferrous and ferric chloride solution in a molar ratio of 1:2 was dissolved in distilled water and 15 mL of sapota plant leaf extract under magnetic stirring for 15 min, followed by a drop-by-drop addition of the surfactant solution made by dissolving 60 mM lauric/oleic/linoleic/linolenic acid in distilled water/ethanol. After the complete mixing of the above chemicals, pure ammonia was added as a precipitant at 80 °C for 15 min, followed by magnetic stirring at 80 °C for 1 h. A black precipitate solution formed, which was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min, followed by washing twice with distilled water. The obtained black precipitate was dried in a hot air oven for 4 h at 100 °C.

3. Characterization of MNPs

The initial confirmation of the presence of unsaturated fatty acids on the surface of MNPs was conducted by FTIR spectroscopy. It was used to determine the functional group of active compounds based on the peak value in the infrared region. Another confirmation for the presence of a surfactant and the morphology of surfactant-coated MNPs was examined by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The presence of a surfactant on the surface of MNPs was analyzed in terms of a change in the physical and chemical properties of materials with an increasing temperature or as a function of time by a thermogravimetric analyzer. The crystalline structure of the sample was identified by X-ray diffraction. The X-rays were produced using a sealed tube and the wavelength of the X-ray was 1.54 nm Cu K-alpha radiations. The diffraction patterns were carried out using a 2θ range of 25–70. The particle size, lattice parameter and area were calculated by applying the Scherrer equation to the obtained XRD data. The exact size of the uncoated and surfactant-coated MNPs was determined by a transmission electron microscope. Magnetization was measured by means of a 14 T PPMS vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). Zero field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) was performed by cooling the sample to 300 K, and in the presence of the external field of 500 Oe and M/Ms, it was studied at 10, 100 and 300 K.

3.1. FTIR Analysis

FTIR spectroscopy was used to identify the functional groups of the active components based on the bands in the region of infrared radiation. In Figure 2, the FTIR spectra showed a band at ~3452 cm−1, which is assigned for the stretching vibration of –OH, i.e., absorbed by Fe3O4 NPs. The bands at 2951 cm−1 and 2850 cm−1 are assigned for stretching vibrations in the methylene (H=C=H) group of arachidonic acid. The bands at 1626 cm−1 and 1408 cm−1 are assigned for the stretching vibration of C=C, and the band at 1574 cm−1 is assigned for the vibration in C=O of arachidonic acid, whereas the band at 577 cm−1 shows the stretching vibration of Fe-O of the surfactant-coated MNPs [13,14,15]. FTIR spectra of pure Fe3O4 show a band at 3452 cm−1 assigned for –OH and 573 cm−1, which shows stretching vibration in Fe-O of pure MNPs [16,17,18,19]. Yadav et al. 2020 also obtained bands for Fe-O in the range of 400–800 cm−1 [15].

3.2. TGA Analysis

TGA results in Figure 3a show that MNPs coated with one of the surfactants oleic acids had an initial weight loss of 1.44% at around 150 °C, followed by a gradual loss of 3.84, 13.42 and 8.20% at around 270, 445 and 622 °C, respectively. At 699.5 °C, the residual mass was only 70.57% but, in comparison to the coated MNPs, uncoated MNPs had a 97.10% residual mass at 699.5 °C shown in Figure 3b [20,21].

3.3. SEM Analysis

A scanning electron microscope (SEM) of uncoated MNPs and all the fatty-acid-coated MNPs are shown in Figure 4a–f. Figure 4a,b shows the SEM micrographs of uncoated MNPs, which are highly aggregated. Figure 4c shows a SEM micrograph of lauric-acid-coated MNPs, Figure 4d shows oleic acid-coated MNPs, Figure 4e shows a SEM micrograph of linoleic-acid-coated MNPs, and Figure 4d shows a SEM micrograph of linolenic-acid-coated MNPs. The size of all the particles is 10–30 nm, but due to aggregation and their very small size, they exhibit large lumps. The particles are highly aggregated as shown in the images. Several investigators have also reported a similar morphology of the synthesized MNPs, such as Yadav and Fulekar (2018), [22] and Yadav et al. 2020 [15]. The authors have obtained a range of sizes, i.e., 20 nm to 120 nm, by the chemical co-precipitation method [22]. Besides this, Pandya et al. 2018 also obtained similar results for synthesized MNPs using the chemical co-precipitation method. The particle size distribution was around 20–100 nm. It was polydispersed in nature, and as the unsaturation increased, particle size decreased.

3.4. XRD Analysis

The black precipitate was formed by the chemical co-precipitation method, and it was identified as magnetite by the X-ray diffraction pattern. The diffraction pattern for bared and surfactant-coated magnetite is shown in Figure 5. All the peaks were indexed as magnetite (reference code: JCPDS 01-088-0315), indicating the presence of a single-phase cubic spinel structure and the diffraction peaks were fairly broad. The maximum intensity peak was found at 35.3–35.5ɵ (311) [23], which indicates the formation of the magnetite phase of iron oxide nanoparticles.
The size, shape, lattice parameter and area of bared MNPs and surfactant-coated MNPs were analyzed using XRD data by following the Scherrer equation [24].
τ = K λ / ω   c o s θ
where τ is the mean size of the ordered domain, K is the dimensionless shape factor, which is 0.9, λ is the X-ray wavelength, ω is the width on the 2θ scale and θ is the Bragg angle. The obtained results are shown in Table 1.
The obtained result is in agreement with previous results obtained for MNPs. Yadav and Fulekar (2018) and Yadav et al. 2020 also obtained peaks at 33 and 35°, which was attributed to the hematite and magnetite phase of the IONPs [22,25,26,27,28].

3.5. TEM Analysis

The effect of coating with unsaturated fatty acids will give magnetite nanoparticles colloidal stability and superparamagnetic stability by forming a double layer around the magnetite nanoparticle. Figure 6a,d shows TEM images of uncoated MNPs. The particle is of a cuboidal to spherical shape, whose size varies from 7–10 nm. This small size of the MNPs indicates the formation of the superparamagnetic nanoparticle. Figure 6e,f shows TEM images of lauric-acid-coated MNPs. The size of the particle is 4–8 nm as revealed by TEM, whereas the particle is spherical to cuboidal in shape. Figure 6g,h shows TEM images of oleic-acid-coated MNPs whose size is 4–8 nm and whose shape is also spherical to cuboidal. Figure 6i,j shows TEM images at 20 nm where the size of linoleic-acid-coated MNPs varies from 5–15 nm and the shape is cuboidal to spherical. The linolenic-acid-coated MNPs are shown in Figure 6k,l, whose size varies from 5–14 nm. Here, the morphology is also mainly spherical to cuboidal in shape. So, in all the types of MNPs, the size varies from ~16 nm to ~8 nm as shown in Figure 6a–k. All the particles showed aggregation, and this could be due to their very small size. In all cases, the average particle size of the synthesized magnetite nanoparticle hybrid was calculated using the Debye–Scherrer formula ranging from 12 nm to 6 nm, which is much less than what was obtained from TEM measurements for the same surfactant hybrid samples and confirms the presence of the non-crystalline surfactant layer on the surface of the magnetite nanoparticles [29]. Yadav and Fulekar (2018) [22], and Yadav et al. 2020 [15] reported the synthesis of the cuboidal to spherical shape of the MNPs by the chemical co-precipitation method. The size of uncapped MNPs varied from 8–20 nm.

4. Result and Discussion

Magnetic Study

MNPs at room temperature show superparamagnetic behavior, i.e., no hysteresis loop. However, a hysteresis loop can be achieved by pinning magnetic domain walls at grain boundaries within the material and by that material becoming ferromagnetic [30]. If synthesized NPs are of a size below a superparamagnetic critical size. In that case, hysteresis behavior vanishes above the blocking temperature. The magnetic behavior of MNPs was studied using VSM, ZFC and FC curves in the presence of the external field of 500 Oe. Increasing the temperature up to 300 K, as presented in Figure 7a–e, shows that these uncoated MNPs and surfactant-coated MNPs exhibit a superparamagnetic nature [31,32,33,34]
The increase in blocking temperature with an increase in the unsaturation of the surfactant may be understood as the particle size decreasing the thickness of the double layer and subsequently increasing, making the effective size of the surfactant–magnetite hybrid bigger. This may indicate that the average distance between magnetite nanoparticles does not change significantly. It seems that the double layering took place on the surface of some already agglomerated magnetite nanoparticles and not on all the individual magnetite nanoparticles. From Figure 7a, we can see the loss of magnetization with the increase in temperature over 200 K is very sharp for uncoated MNPs in comparison with the bilayer-coated MNPs, which are very smooth and slow. It can be understood that the bilayer of the surface of the magnetite acts as a shielding layer for the heat transfer to the inner magnetite, therefore reducing the rate of decreased magnetization.
The hysteresis magnetic loop M(H) was measured at 10, 100 and 300 K for both uncoated and surfactant-coated MNPs, presented in Figure 8. The saturation magnetization (MS) of surfactant-coated MNPs, in comparison to bared MNPs, was observed at 10, 100 and 300 K, and it was observed that surfactant-coated MNPs have a lower MS value than uncoated MNPs. By comparing MS for surfactant-coated MNPs at 10, 100 and 300 K, it is found that oleic acid with a minimum Ms value will have the maximum extent of the adsorbed layer of a surfactant.
Surfactants with a higher unsaturation bring more fluidity to the double layer as the area per molecule adsorption increases with unsaturation because of a kink in their structure, which certainly makes the surfactant hybrid magnetite more biocompatible and less toxic. The extent of adsorption for higher unsaturated fatty acids is less confirmed by their saturation magnetization value, which is very much essential for these fatty acid magnetite hybrids to be influenced efficiently under an external magnetic field for their application in the biomedical field. Yadav et al. 2020 have also obtained similar results for the magnetic strength of the IONPs [35,36,37].
The variation of magnetic properties of all surfactant hybrids in comparison with uncoated MNPs has been tabulated below in Table 2.

5. Conclusions

The present study shows a surface modification of MNPs using a range of unsaturated fatty acids. The synthesized MNPs and analysis by analytical instruments revealed their detailed information. The microscopic analysis, i.e., SEM and TEM, showed that particles are highly aggregated, with individual sizes varying from 14 nm to 8 nm. The band obtained in the region of 400–600 in FTIR confirmed the formation of MNPs due to the Fe-O bond. Additionally, the presence of various functional groups indicated the capping by unsaturated acids. Magnetic study shows that surfactant-coated MNPs have an increase in blocking temperature and splitting temperature in comparison to uncoated MNPs. The increase in blocking temperature with an increase in the unsaturation of the surfactant may be understood as the particle size decreases, the thickness of the double layer will also increase, making the effective size of the surfactant–magnetite hybrid bigger. The surfactant-coated MNPs with a lower saturation magnetization value than the uncoated MNPs at 10 K, 100 K and 300 K confirm the double-layer coating on the magnetite surface. Surfactants with more unsaturation in their tail will bring more fluidity to the double layer of the surface of the magnetite, making it more biocompatible and less toxic. Because of the presence of a double bond in the fatty acid tail, which brings polarity to the tail, the double layer eventually becomes more hydrophilic and the extent of water content increases; therefore, the water-soluble drug can easily be entrapped in the double layer. Therefore, this bilayer surfactant–magnetite hybrid could be the best to be used in targeted drug delivery.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K.D., A.F., B.O.A., N.A. and D.A.; data curation, N.A., N.Y. and V.K.Y.; methodology, V.S.S., N.A., A.K.D., V.P. and D.A.; validation, V.S.S., V.K.Y. and A.K.D.; formal analysis, V.K.Y., V.S.S. and D.A.; resources, N.Y., N.A. and A.F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K.D., V.S.S., V.P., A.F., D.A. and N.A.; writing—review and editing, N.Y., B.O.A., V.S.S., V.P., A.K.D., V.K.Y. and A.F.; supervision, A.K.D., N.Y., V.S.S. and D.A.; project administration, V.S.S., A.K.D., V.P., V.K.Y. and N.A.; funding acquisition, B.O.A., D.A., N.Y., V.K.Y. and N.A.; investigation, B.P., V.P., A.F., V.S.S., N.A. and V.P.; software, B.O.A., V.K.Y., N.Y., V.P. and V.S.S.; visualization, A.K.D., D.A. and N.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/165), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia AKD, AP, VKY and VSS are thankful to the Department of Chemistry, SLAS, and Mody University of Science and Technology for providing laboratory and instrument facilities for the research work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Justin, C.; Philip, S.A.; Samrot, A.V. Synthesis and characterization of superparamagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) and utilization of SPIONs in X-ray imaging. Appl. Nanosci. 2017, 7, 463–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kamali, M.S.; Ericsson, T.; Wäppling, R. Characterization of iron oxide nanoparticles by Mössbauer spectroscopy. Thin Solid Films 2006, 515, 721–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ahmadi, S.; Fazilati, M.; Nazem, H.; Mousavi, S.M. Green Synthesis of Magnetic Nanoparticles Using Satureja hortensis Essential Oil toward Superior Antibacterial/Fungal and Anticancer Performance. Biomed. Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 8822645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cano, M.; Sbargoud, K.; Allard, E.; Larpent, C. Magnetic separation of fatty acids with iron oxide nanoparticles and application to extractive deacidification of vegetable oils. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 1786–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahghari, M.R.; Soltaninejad, V.; Maleki, A. Synthesis of nickel nanoparticles by a green and convenient method as a magnetic mirror with antibacterial activities. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ying, S.; Guan, Z.; Ofoegbu, P.C.; Clubb, P.; Rico, C.; He, F.; Hong, J. Green synthesis of nanoparticles: Current developments and limitations. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 26, 102336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mahmad Rozi, S.K.; Bakhshaei, S.; Abdul Manan, N.S.; Mohamad, S. Superhydrophobic magnetic nanoparticle-free fatty acid regenerated from waste cooking oil for the enrichment of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sewage sludges and landfill leachates. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 87719–87729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lenin, R.; Joy, P.A. Studies on the role of unsaturation in the fatty acid surfactant molecule on the thermal conductivity of magnetite nanofluids. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 506, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Valenzuela, R.; Fuentes, M.C.; Parra, C.; Baeza, J.; Durán, N.; Sharma, S.K.; Knobel, M.; Freer, J. Influence of stirring velocity on the synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles (Fe3O4) by the co-precipitation method. J. Alloy. Compd. 2009, 488, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vereda, F.; de Vicente, J.; Hidalgo-Álvarez, R. Influence of a Magnetic Field on the Formation of Magnetite Particles via Two Precipitation Methods. Langmuir 2007, 23, 3581–3589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, B.; Wei, Q.; Qu, S. Synthesis and Characterization of Uniform and Crystalline Magnetite Nanoparticles via Oxidation-precipitation and Modified co-precipitation Methods. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013, 8, 3786–3793. [Google Scholar]
  12. Etemadifar, R.; Kianvash, A.; Arsalani, N.; Abouzari-Lotf, E.; Hajalilou, A. Green synthesis of superparamagnetic magnetite nanoparticles: Effect of natural surfactant and heat treatment on the magnetic properties. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 17144–17153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yadav, V.K.; Yadav, K.K.; Gnanamoorthy, G.; Choudhary, N.; Khan, S.H.; Gupta, N.; Kamyab, H.; Bach, Q.-V. A novel synthesis and characterization of polyhedral shaped amorphous iron oxide nanoparticles from incense sticks ash waste. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 20, 101089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yadav, V.K.; Gnanamoorthy, G.; Ali, D.; Bera, S.P.; Roy, A.; Kumar, G.; Choudhary, N.; Kalasariya, H.; Basnet, A. Cytotoxicity, Removal of Congo Red Dye in Aqueous Solution Using Synthesized Amorphous Iron Oxide Nanoparticles from Incense Sticks Ash Waste. J. Nanomater. 2022, 2022, 5949595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yadav, V.; Ali, D.; Khan, S.; Gnanamoorthy, G.; Choudhary, N.; Yadav, K.; Thai, V.; Hussain, S.; Manhrdas, S. Synthesis and characterization of amorphous iron oxide nanoparticles by the sonochemical method and their application for the remediation of heavy metals from wastewater. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, K.; Peng, H.; Wen, Y.; Li, N. Re-examination of characteristic FTIR spectrum of secondary layer in bilayer oleic acid-coated Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 3093–3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Meng, X.; Li, L.; Ye, Q.; van de Voort, F. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy as a Utilitarian Tool for the Routine Determination of Acidity in Ester-Based Oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 8333–8338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Santhosh, S.; Satish, M.; Yadav, A.; Anish Madhavan, A. Thermal analysis of Fe2O3- Myristic acid nanocomposite for latent heat storage. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 43, 3795–3798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gholoobi, A.; Abnous, K.; Ramezani, M.; Shandiz, F.H.; Darroudi, M.; Ghayour-Mobarhan, M.; Meshkat, Z. Synthesis of γ-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles Capped with Oleic Acid and their Magnetic Characterization. Iran J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A Sci. 2018, 42, 1889–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rudolph, M.; Erler, J.; Peuker, U.A. A TGA-FTIR perspective of fatty acid adsorbed on magnetite nanoparticles-Decomposition steps and magnetite reduction. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2012, 397, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, L.; He, R.; Gu, H.C. Oleic acid coating on the monodisperse magnetite nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 253, 2611–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yadav, V.K.; Fulekar, M.H. Biogenic synthesis of maghemite nanoparticles (γ-Fe2O3) using Tridax leaf extract and its application for removal of fly ash heavy metals (Pb, Cd). Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 20704–20710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Arévalo, P.; Isasi, J.; Caballero, A.C.; Marco, J.F.; Martín-Hernández, F. Magnetic and structural studies of Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized via coprecipitation and dispersed in different surfactants. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 10333–10340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dorniani, D.; Hussein MZ bin Kura, A.U.; Fakurazi, S.; Shaari, A.H.; Ahmad, Z. Preparation of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles coated with gallic acid for drug delivery. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 5745–5756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Hanesch, M. Raman spectroscopy of iron oxides and (oxy)hydroxides at low laser power and possible applications in environmental magnetic studies. Geophys. J. Int. 2009, 177, 941–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wegmann, M.; Scharr, M. Synthesis of Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. In Precision Medicine; Deigner, H.-P., Kohl, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; Chapter 8; pp. 145–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Joos, A.; Rümenapp, C.; Wagner, F.E.; Gleich, B. Characterisation of iron oxide nanoparticles by Mössbauer spectroscopy at ambient temperature. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2016, 399, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yadav, V.K.; Gnanamoorthy, G.; Yadav, K.K.; Ali, I.H.; Bagabas, A.A.; Choudhary, N.; Yadav, S.; Suriyaprabha, R.; Islam, S.; Modi, S.; et al. Utilization of Incense Stick Ash in Hydrometallurgy Methods for Extracting Oxides of Fe, Al, Si, and Ca. Materials 2022, 15, 1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shagholani, H.; Ghoreishi, S.M.; Mousazadeh, M. Improvement of interaction between PVA and chitosan via magnetite nanoparticles for drug delivery application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 78, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yetim, N.K.; Kurşun, F. Magnetic and Structural Characterization of Inorganic/Organic coated Fe3O4 Nanoparticles. J. Mater. Electron. Devices 2021, 2, 12–18. [Google Scholar]
  31. Corrêa, B.S.; Costa, M.S.; Cabrera-Pasca, G.A.; Sena, C.; Pinto, R.H.H.; Silva, A.P.S.; Junior, R.N.C.; Ishida, L.; Ramon, J.G.A.; Freitas, R.S.; et al. High-saturation magnetization in small nanoparticles of Fe3O4 coated with natural oils. J. Nanopart. Res. 2020, 22, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Barbeta, V.B.; Jardim, R.F.; Kiyohara, P.K.; Effenberger, F.B.; Rossi, L.M. Magnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles coated with oleic and dodecanoic acids. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107, 073913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Salvador, M.; Marqués-Fernández, J.L.; Martínez-García, J.C.; Fiorani, D.; Arosio, P.; Avolio, M.; Brero, F.; Balanean, F.; Guerrini, A.; Sangregorio, C.; et al. Double-Layer Fatty Acid Nanoparticles as a Multiplatform for Diagnostics and Therapy. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Huo, D.; Tan, W. Room-temperature magnetoresistive and magnetocaloric effect in La1-xBa xMnO3compounds: Role of Griffiths phase with ferromagnetic metal cluster above Curie temperature. J. Appl. Phys. 2022, 131, 043901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yadav, V.K.; Singh, B.; Gacem, A.; Yadav, K.K.; Gnanamoorthy, G.; Alsufyani, T.; Hussein, H.S.; Awwad, N.S.; Verma, R.; Inwati, G.K.; et al. Development of Novel Microcomposite Materials from Coal Fly Ash and Incense Sticks Ash Waste and Their Application for Remediation of Malachite Green Dye from Aqueous Solutions. Water 2022, 14, 3871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yadav, V.K.; Gacem, A.; Choudhary, N.; Rai, A.; Kumar, P.; Yadav, K.K.; Abbas, M.; Khedher, N.B.; Awwad, N.S.; Barik, D.; et al. Status of Coal-Based Thermal Power Plants, Coal Fly Ash Production, Utilization in India and Their Emerging Applications. Minerals 2022, 12, 1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pare, B.; Barde, V.S.; Solanki, V.S.; Agarwal, N.; Yadav, V.K.; Alam, M.M.; Gacem, A.; Alsufyani, T.; Khedher, N.B.; Park, J.-W.; et al. Green Synthesis and Characterization of LED-Irradiation-Responsive Nano ZnO Catalyst and Photocatalytic Mineralization of Malachite Green Dye. Water 2022, 14, 3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g001 550
Figure 1. MNPs coated by fatty acid.
Figure 1. MNPs coated by fatty acid.
Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g001
Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g002 550
Figure 2. TIR spectra of uncoated and surfactant-coated MNPs.
Figure 2. TIR spectra of uncoated and surfactant-coated MNPs.
Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g002
Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g003 550
Figure 3. GA analysis for (a) surfactant-coated MNPs, (b) uncoated MNPs.
Figure 3. GA analysis for (a) surfactant-coated MNPs, (b) uncoated MNPs.
Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g003
Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g004a 550Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g004b 550
Figure 4. EM images of (a,b) uncoated MNPs, (c) lauric-acid-coated MNPs, (d) oleic-acid-coated MNPs, (e) linoleic-acid-coated MNPs, (f) linolenic-acid-coated MNPs.
Figure 4. EM images of (a,b) uncoated MNPs, (c) lauric-acid-coated MNPs, (d) oleic-acid-coated MNPs, (e) linoleic-acid-coated MNPs, (f) linolenic-acid-coated MNPs.
Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g004aMagnetochemistry 08 00174 g004b
Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g005 550
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction pattern of uncoated MNPs and surfactant-coated MNPs.
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction pattern of uncoated MNPs and surfactant-coated MNPs.
Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g005
Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g006a 550Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g006b 550Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g006c 550
Figure 6. TEM images of (a–d) uncoated MNPs, (e,f) lauric-acid-coated MNPs, (g,h) oleic-acid-coated MNPs, (i,j) linoleic-acid-coated MNPs, (k,l) linolenic-acid-coated MNPs.
Figure 6. TEM images of (a–d) uncoated MNPs, (e,f) lauric-acid-coated MNPs, (g,h) oleic-acid-coated MNPs, (i,j) linoleic-acid-coated MNPs, (k,l) linolenic-acid-coated MNPs.
Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g006aMagnetochemistry 08 00174 g006bMagnetochemistry 08 00174 g006c
Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g007 550
Figure 7. ZFC and FC curve for (a) uncoated MNPs, (b) lauric-acid-coated MNPs, (c) oleic-acid-coated MNPs, (d) linoleic-acid-coated MNPs, (e) linolenic-acid-coated MNPs.
Figure 7. ZFC and FC curve for (a) uncoated MNPs, (b) lauric-acid-coated MNPs, (c) oleic-acid-coated MNPs, (d) linoleic-acid-coated MNPs, (e) linolenic-acid-coated MNPs.
Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g007
Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g008a 550Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g008b 550
Figure 8. Comparison of MH curve for uncoated MNPs with surfactant-coated MNPs at (a) 10 K, (b) 100 K, (c) 300 K.
Figure 8. Comparison of MH curve for uncoated MNPs with surfactant-coated MNPs at (a) 10 K, (b) 100 K, (c) 300 K.
Magnetochemistry 08 00174 g008aMagnetochemistry 08 00174 g008b
Table
Table 1. Results obtained from XRD analysis.
Table 1. Results obtained from XRD analysis.
Sr. No.MNPs Coated byShapeAreaLattice ParameterParticle Size (nm)
By XRDBy TEM
1.UncoatedCubic263.728.36577 × 10−1015~16
2.Lauric acidCubic193.328.35144 × 10−1012~14
3.Oleic acidCubic307.808.37072 × 10−1010~12
4.Linoleic acidCubic221.868.3763 × 10−108~10
5.Linolenic acidCubic207.768.3763 × 10−106~8
Table
Table 2. Variation of magnetic properties of surfactant hybrids in comparison to uncoated MNP.
Table 2. Variation of magnetic properties of surfactant hybrids in comparison to uncoated MNP.
MNPs Coated byMS (emu/g)HC (Oe)MR (emu/g)TB
(K)		TP
(K)
10 K100 K300 K10 K100 K300 K10 K100 K300 K
Uncoated66655614536015704355
Lauric acid5755471521000161004058
Oleic acid51493715273014304878
Linoleic acid525044214390164072106
Linolenic acid5149411610013005071
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Das, A.K.; Fanan, A.; Ali, D.; Solanki, V.S.; Pare, B.; Almutairi, B.O.; Agrawal, N.; Yadav, N.; Pareek, V.; Yadav, V.K. Green Synthesis of Unsaturated Fatty Acid Mediated Magnetite Nanoparticles and Their Structural and Magnetic Studies. Magnetochemistry 2022, 8, 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry8120174

AMA Style

Das AK, Fanan A, Ali D, Solanki VS, Pare B, Almutairi BO, Agrawal N, Yadav N, Pareek V, Yadav VK. Green Synthesis of Unsaturated Fatty Acid Mediated Magnetite Nanoparticles and Their Structural and Magnetic Studies. Magnetochemistry. 2022; 8(12):174. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry8120174

Chicago/Turabian Style

Das, Amlan Kumar, Apoorva Fanan, Daoud Ali, Vijendra Singh Solanki, Brijesh Pare, Bader O. Almutairi, Neha Agrawal, Neera Yadav, Vikram Pareek, and Virendra Kumar Yadav. 2022. "Green Synthesis of Unsaturated Fatty Acid Mediated Magnetite Nanoparticles and Their Structural and Magnetic Studies" Magnetochemistry 8, no. 12: 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry8120174

APA Style

Das, A. K., Fanan, A., Ali, D., Solanki, V. S., Pare, B., Almutairi, B. O., Agrawal, N., Yadav, N., Pareek, V., & Yadav, V. K. (2022). Green Synthesis of Unsaturated Fatty Acid Mediated Magnetite Nanoparticles and Their Structural and Magnetic Studies. Magnetochemistry, 8(12), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry8120174

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop