Next Article in Journal
A Review of Magnetically Controlled Continuum Robots: Principles, Classification, and Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Low-Cost, Biodegradable, and Magnetic Biocomposite of Luffa cylindrica Fruit and Natural Magnetite by Removal of Microplastics
Previous Article in Journal
Construction of Y-Doped Magnetic CoFe2O4 Electrode Materials Based on Dual-Waste Biomass and Study on Performance of Asymmetric Supercapacitors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ferrofluids Based on Anionic Polysaccharide-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles for Targeted Magnetocatalytic-Driven Multimodal Anticancer Therapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Why Magnetic Nanoparticles Still Struggle to Translate: A Systematic Analysis of Structural Gaps in Nanobiotechnology

by
Fernando Gomes de Souza, Jr.
1,2,3,*,
Carolina de Souza Cardoso Delfino
2 and
Yuri Ranieri de Medeiros Camargo
2
1
Instituto de Macromoléculas Professora Eloisa Mano, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Centro de Tecnologia, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro 21941-598, Brazil
2
Instituto Alberto Luiz Coimbra de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa de Engenharia—COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Centro de Tecnologia, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro 21941-972, Brazil
3
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Florida International University (FIU), 10555 West Flagler Street, EC3900, Miami, FL 33174, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Magnetochemistry 2026, 12(6), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry12060065
Submission received: 26 December 2025 / Revised: 22 May 2026 / Accepted: 29 May 2026 / Published: 5 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Magnetic Nano- and Microparticles in Biotechnology)

Abstract

This review offers an in-depth look at the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of MNPs as superparamagnetic and high-surface-area-to-volume entities, considering their applications in MRI, magnetic hyperthermia, and targeted drug delivery. Based on an integrative approach, which includes systematic searches in 3 main bibliographic databases, 870 articles, semantic network analysis, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and gap classification (Miles’ taxonomy), our analysis identifies a constant gap between lab performances and in vivo applications, described through eight critical challenges. The development of MNP-based biotechnologies is largely hindered by open issues in terms of safety, standardization, and control of the nanobio interface, mainly incomplete physicochemical characterization and poor methodological harmonization, because the high sensitivity of MNPs to synthesis routes and scale is a major bottleneck for GMP-compatible translation. Moreover, the analysis of in vivo data suggests that, on average, less than 1% of the injected dose accumulates in solid tumors, whereas a substantial fraction is diverted to non-target organs, particularly those associated with the mononuclear phagocyte system, reinforcing concerns regarding off-target sequestration, incomplete clearance, and long-term safety. Other critical challenges include complex interactions with biofluids, lack of unifying conceptual frameworks, limited experimental validation, underexploited methodological integration, and geographical and biological biases. Consequently, successfully overcoming these challenges will require the early and deliberate integration of rigorous materials engineering, mechanistic biological insight, and application-oriented validation for robust, reproducible, and translatable magnetic nanoplatforms.
Keywords: magnetic nanoparticles; biotechnology; nanomedicine; translational abyss; reproducibility; standardization; protein corona; characterization; scalability; theranostics magnetic nanoparticles; biotechnology; nanomedicine; translational abyss; reproducibility; standardization; protein corona; characterization; scalability; theranostics

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Souza, F.G., Jr.; de Souza Cardoso Delfino, C.; Camargo, Y.R.d.M. Why Magnetic Nanoparticles Still Struggle to Translate: A Systematic Analysis of Structural Gaps in Nanobiotechnology. Magnetochemistry 2026, 12, 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry12060065

AMA Style

de Souza FG Jr., de Souza Cardoso Delfino C, Camargo YRdM. Why Magnetic Nanoparticles Still Struggle to Translate: A Systematic Analysis of Structural Gaps in Nanobiotechnology. Magnetochemistry. 2026; 12(6):65. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry12060065

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Souza, Fernando Gomes, Jr., Carolina de Souza Cardoso Delfino, and Yuri Ranieri de Medeiros Camargo. 2026. "Why Magnetic Nanoparticles Still Struggle to Translate: A Systematic Analysis of Structural Gaps in Nanobiotechnology" Magnetochemistry 12, no. 6: 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry12060065

APA Style

de Souza, F. G., Jr., de Souza Cardoso Delfino, C., & Camargo, Y. R. d. M. (2026). Why Magnetic Nanoparticles Still Struggle to Translate: A Systematic Analysis of Structural Gaps in Nanobiotechnology. Magnetochemistry, 12(6), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry12060065

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop