You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Horticulturae
  • Review
  • Open Access

15 November 2023

Technological Trends and Engineering Issues on Vertical Farms: A Review

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Graduate School, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Agricultural and Industrial Engineering, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh
3
Department of Smart Agricultural Systems, Graduate School, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea
4
Agricultural Technical Institute, Division of Horticultural Technologies, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA
This article belongs to the Special Issue Controlled Environment Horticulture: Latest Advances and Future Prospects

Abstract

Vertical farming has emerged as a promising solution to cope with increasing food demand, urbanization pressure, and limited resources and to ensure sustainable year-round urban agriculture. The aim of this review was to investigate the evolving technological landscape and engineering considerations, with a focus on innovative developments and future prospects. This paper presents technological trends in vertical farming, covering advances in sensing technologies, monitoring and control systems, and unmanned systems. It also highlights the growing role of artificial intelligence (AI) in contributing to data-driven decision-making and the optimization of vertical farms. A global perspective on vertical farming is presented, including the current status and advanced technological trends across regions like Asia, the USA, and Europe. Innovative concepts and upcoming enterprises that could shape the future of vertical agriculture are explored. Additionally, the challenges and future prospects of vertical farming are also addressed, focusing on crop production limitations, environmental sustainability, economic feasibility, and contributions to global food security. This review provides guidance on the state of vertical farming, technological advancements, global trends, challenges, and prospects, offering insights into the roles of researchers, practitioners, and policymakers in advancing sustainable vertical agriculture and food security.

1. Introduction

The global population is expected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050 and 10.4 billion by 2100 [], accompanied by a significant urban shift, with 70% of people living in urban environments [,]. Rapid population growth and urbanization are exerting immense pressure on food-production systems []. As a result, the demand for higher agricultural yields is increasing. Moreover, the expansion of urban areas and the development of infrastructure are further encroaching on farmland, creating food shortages []. Addressing these challenges requires innovative approaches, as traditional farming methods have limitations concerning available land and yield.
The increasing global demand for food production, combined with the difficulties presented by climate change and limited arable land, has prompted a critical need for innovative and efficient agricultural practices. Farmland abandonment is a global issue stemming from inefficient agricultural practices, an aging rural labor force, and various other factors. Arable land is left unused due to these challenges. Enhancing farming efficiency and reducing costs through innovative practices is crucial, even in traditional rural areas, to address this trend. To address this issue, the implementation of advanced, precise techniques for food production using controlled environment agriculture (CEA) has garnered increasing attention [,]. CEA includes a range of innovative systems like greenhouses, plant factories, and vertical farms, which offer promising solutions to securing sustainable food supplies. CEA systems are designed to protect crops from external weather conditions, thereby reducing their vulnerability to extreme weather events and climate fluctuations. These controlled environments enable precise control, monitoring, and regulation of the microclimate within cultivation areas. This results in higher yields that remain stable throughout the year, supporting year-round production [,,]. The CEA approach, commonly implemented through advanced vertical farming systems, is progressively recognized as a sustainable method for high-intensity food production, achieved through the use of soilless substrates, artificial LED lighting, and precise control of growth parameters.
Vertical farming, a revolutionary agricultural approach involving multiple levels of crop-growing platforms, is gaining attention for its potential to increase crop yield per unit area of land [,]. The profitability of vertical farming may be impacted by rising costs. It is essential to take into account the overall economic viability, considering the increase in various expenses. This innovative crop-cultivation system offers a promising solution to address the challenges posed by population growth, limited arable land, and environmental constraints on traditional farming methods. Urbanization and population growth drive the global vertical farming market, which reached USD 5.6 billion in 2022 and is predicted to surpass USD 35 billion by 2032 (Figure 1). Vertical farming optimizes space, reducing the need for land and construction in cities, with a growing demand fueled by the popularity of organic food []. However, vertical farming encounters challenges in sensor technology, innovative cultivation techniques for diverse crops, energy optimization, and automation. These challenges are expected to drive advancements toward more efficient production systems.
Figure 1. Projected vertical farming market worldwide from 2022 to 2032 (in billion USD) [].
At the core of vertical farming is the utilization of cutting-edge technological equipment and sophisticated sensors, which facilitate comprehensive monitoring of the cultivation environment. By utilizing automation and actuators, these systems maintain the uniform and optimal conditions essential for crop health and development, leading to improved energy management and resource efficiency [,]. Integrating these advanced technologies not only enhances crop yields but also minimizes resource waste, making vertical farming an environmentally sustainable alternative to conventional farming practices []. However, integrating sensors and control mechanisms for efficient monitoring and regulation across different levels can be challenging, as it requires sophisticated automation and data-management systems.
Vertical farming technology is experiencing rapid and diverse advancements. The initial phase of indoor farming was primarily concentrated on monitoring and controlling factors such as lighting, nutrients, temperature, and humidity. However, recent developments have led growers to adopt novel technologies for data collection and analysis, aimed at optimizing crop yield []. This trend is particularly promising for enhancing food sustainability in urban areas and presents opportunities to positively impact the environment, society, and economy [,]. Although vertical farms have demonstrated their potential for producing a wide array of crops, further research is essential in order to achieve technical and economic optimization.
One crucial aspect of this transformation from traditional farming to vertical farming is the changing perceptions of land use []. Vertical farming enables the cultivation of crops in urban settings by converting underutilized spaces, such as warehouses, abandoned buildings, or even skyscrapers, into productive agricultural hubs []. This reclamation of urban space has the potential to relieve pressure on rural areas by minimizing the need for extensive agricultural lands and preserving natural ecosystems. Moreover, vertical farming systems are highly adaptable and can be tailored to the specific needs of each community, promoting localized and resilient food production.
Numerous studies have been conducted on vertical farming, covering a range of topics, including the various categories of vertical farms [], prototypes and operational characteristics [], environmental control and resource efficiency [,], smart indoor farm architecture, sensing technologies [,], consumer perceptions and acceptance [,], and the potential and limitations []. However, there is a noticeable scarcity of research focused on advanced technologies, trends, and challenges in vertical farming from the engineering perspective.
Therefore, this review aims to explore the latest technological advancements in vertical farming, including sensors, automation, robots, and artificial intelligence (AI), and discuss how these technologies are integrated into vertical farming systems to enhance crop yield, resource efficiency, and overall sustainability. First, the core aspects of vertical farming are outlined, addressing its concept, classification, and key considerations. Next, it explores current technological trends, highlighting advancements in sensing technology, unmanned vertical farming systems, and AI-based research trends. Then, a global landscape of vertical farming is presented, analyzing industry and market trends in Asia, the United States, and Europe, along with innovative concepts in upcoming vertical farms. Finally, the article investigates the growing need for and promotion of vertical farms, focusing on their potential to address issues related to urban population growth, limited crop diversity, food security, and economic challenges.

2. Vertical Farming: Concept, Classification, and Key Considerations

2.1. Definition and Types

Vertical farms comprise multistory structures designed for the cultivation of fruits, vegetables, and nonedible plants using advanced technologies, similar to high-tech greenhouses and harnessing technologies, and fall under CEA []. They are a modern approach to agriculture [] that addresses challenges in food production due to population growth, environmental concerns, and limited space [], enabling efficient cultivation of various products in controlled environments for increased yield [,].
The term “vertical farming” is difficult to grasp, due to inconsistent definitions given by different publications, industries, and stakeholders and a lack of standardized documentation []. In 2010, Despommier [] introduced the concept of vertical farming to address pressing global challenges with regard to agriculture, food supply, the environment, society, and resource scarcity in the face of population growth and climate change. This idea has engaged scientists, engineers, policymakers, and architects, leading to the establishment of numerous vertical farms globally []. During the same year, Japan introduced its inaugural vertical farming facility, which diverged from the conventional commercial enterprise model. Instead, it became an experimental agricultural enterprise affiliated with Chiba University, oriented toward rigorous scientific exploration and investigation [].
Several authors have introduced the concept of vertical farming, often with varied perspectives. Some of these authors proposed that vertical farming can be considered a “model” or an “initiative”, involving the cultivation of crops within high-rise, multistory structures [,,,,,].
Vertical agriculture, a term often used to describe vertical farming, intersects with the more sophisticated concept of CEA. However, CEA is not necessarily interchangeable with vertical farming [,]. Other indoor-farming concepts, such as high-density vertical growing (HDVG) [,], which falls under CEA, and the widely recognized plant factories (PFs), including plant factories with artificial lighting (PFALs) [] and plant production systems with artificial lighting (PPALs) [], are part of the concept of vertical farming but are not synonymous with it. Building-integrated agriculture (BIA) and CEA also overlap, forming building-integrated controlled-environment farms (BICEFs) []. A less common term, sky farming, pertains to agriculture in high-rise buildings []. Waldron [] provided an overview of these vertical farming concepts, describing their relationships and considering size, density, control mechanism, arrangement, architectural design, and site selection as factors in classifying indoor farming (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Types of vertical farms and influencing factors (adapted from []).
To navigate the complexities of vertical farming, standardization efforts are essential. Developing a unified definition and distinguishing it from related concepts like CEA, HDVG, and plant factories will enhance communication and understanding. Research should focus on refining and optimizing advanced technologies to enhance scalability, resource efficiency, and cost-effectiveness in vertical farming operations.

2.2. General Structures and Characteristics

Vertical farming employs indoor cultivation with stacked layers and artificial lighting (AL) to maximize growing space, ranging from small mobile setups to high-rise structures []. It involves creating controlled environments for plants by regulating factors like light, temperature, humidity, CO2, water, and nutrients, resulting in consistent, high-quality produce regardless of outdoor conditions. These factors can be fully automated by integrating sensors, imaging technology, and artificial intelligence (AI) [].
Vertical farming encompasses categories like PFALs, container farms, in-store farms, and appliance farms [,]. PFALs are purpose-built structures using innovative designs and dedicated buildings tailored for large-scale vertical farming. These types of farms are typically located within industrial spaces and create a controlled environment suitable for industrial-level vertical farming. Modified shipping containers are furnished with vertically stacked racks, LED lighting, and digitally supervised control systems. Using containers for these self-contained vertical farming units ensures adaptability and mobility, allowing easy relocation and space optimization.
In-store farms comprise compact cabinet systems strategically placed in locations where direct consumption or purchases occur, like restaurants, bars, or supermarkets. These vertical farming units are situated at the point of sale or consumption, bringing fresh produce closer to consumers. Appliance farms are designed with a focus on smaller-scale utility and are intended for installation in homes or offices. These plug-and-play indoor-cultivation systems offer the ease and convenience of personalized or limited-scale growing. Additional categories of vertical farming include adaptive reusable buildings, deep farms, balconies, and rooftops [,,,]. Beacham et al. [] categorized vertical farming systems, differentiating between stacked horizontal systems and vertical growth surfaces. Stacked horizontal systems include several tiers of horizontally arranged growing surfaces in structures within glasshouses or controlled environments, often incorporating elements like level rotation, multiflora towers, and balconies, whereas vertical growing platforms comprise green walls and cylindrical growth units. In this review, we explored multitiered indoor crop-production systems employing artificial lights in which plant-growth conditions are precisely controlled, which are considered vertical farms.
Figure 3 illustrates the structural elements of a vertical farm. It consists of key components working in harmony to optimize plant growth: (1) a well-insulated and airtight structure resembling a warehouse with opaque walls, creating an ideal plant-cultivation environment; (2) a multitier plant-cultivation bed system equipped with lighting devices positioned above the beds, resembling natural sunlight, to boost photosynthesis and growth; (3) an air-conditioning unit for cooling and dehumidification, complemented by fans to ensure uniform air distribution for healthy photosynthesis and transpiration; (4) a CO2 delivery system to maintain an optimal concentration for improved plant photosynthesis; (5) a nutrient-solution supply system to ensure that plants receive essential nutrients for growth; and (6) an environmental management system to regulate light, temperature, humidity, CO2, and airflow, while also managing nutrient-solution parameters [,,]. Water efficiency is vital in vertical farms, where lighting and watering heavily influence overall efficiency. While vertical farms are more water-efficient than modern sensor-controlled farms, both systems necessitate careful water management. As vertical farms are enclosed systems, ensuring secure crop production, lower CO2 emissions, and efficient resource utilization, they require stringent hygiene protocols. Moreover, advanced technological capabilities should be integrated to effectively monitor and maintain the targeted environmental conditions with precision.
Figure 3. Configuration of a vertical farm: (a) thermally well-insulated and tightly sealed walls; (b) multilevel structure with lighting equipment; (c) air conditioner with fan; (d) CO2 supply unit; (e) hydroponic system (nutrient-solution supply unit); and (f) environmental control unit. (adapted from [,,]).

2.3. Key Considerations

A vertical farm utilizes advanced technology to efficiently cultivate abundant quantities of food crops and medicinal plants within a confined space. Vertical farming revolutionizes food production by enabling the cultivation of crops within a controlled environment facilitated by artificial lighting. This innovative method is intended to optimize crop yield within restricted spaces, operating independently of fluctuating weather conditions. The establishment and operation of an indoor vertical farm hinge on four key factors, the chosen cultivation approach, the selection of crops, the integration of cutting-edge technology, and the strategic choice of location [].

2.3.1. Crop-Cultivation System

Vertical farming employs a soil-free methodology (hydroponics) to deliver water and essential nutrients to plants. This technique involves the circulation of a nutrient solution, which operates in a closed loop, and ensures its return to a central reservoir for effective recycling and subsequent reuse. The selection of a vertical farming cultivation technique is frequently influenced by the grower’s expertise and technological preparedness.
Hydroponic systems grow plants without soil, providing water and nutrients directly. Although there are multiple approaches to designing hydroponic systems, commercially, methods like the nutrient-film technique (NFT), deep water culture (DWC), and aeroponics are used for recirculating nutrient solutions. In DWC, the recirculating nutrient solution is delivered to plants based on the water level, ensuring that bare roots on a gently sloped bed receive constant nourishment. The NFT and the modified deep flow technique (DFT), which are akin to ebb and flow, are popular on vertical farms []. Hydroponics significantly minimizes water evaporation and conserves water, though system disruptions can impact outcomes, even with automated watering. The expenses for nutrients and electricity exceed those for soil-based methods, and nutrient solutions are tailored to specific vegetable requirements. Schematic diagrams with the basic components of each hydroponic technique are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4. Schematic diagrams of hydroponic systems: (a) nutrient-film technique (NFT); (b) ebb-and-flow technique; (c) aeroponics; (d) drip; (e) wick; (f) deep water culture (DWC); (g) multilayer NFT; (h) hybrid aeroponics (aero–hydro). Adapted from [,,,].
Aeroponics, a variation of hydroponics, involves misting plant roots with air or a water solution regularly [], and the plants are typically suspended using boards or foam. This method promotes faster plant growth, requiring precise sensing technology and dosing for optimal results. While aeroponic systems employing air-assisted and centrifugal atomization nozzles have higher initial costs compared to systems using ultrasonic foggers, they potentially have long-term advantages by reducing labor, fertilizer, and pesticide inputs, leading to significantly higher plant yields. To ensure efficient, trouble-free, and cost-effective operation over the long term, routine maintenance and protection from extreme weather conditions are essential for aeroponics systems. These systems are sensitive to climatic conditions in the growth chamber, making weather protection crucial [].
Hydroponic crop-cultivation methods can be categorized based on several aspects, including the choice of cultivation medium (liquid or culture medium), water circulation (open cycle or closed loop), and aeration method (separate air and water or mixed air and water). To select the most suitable hydroponic technique, it is crucial to understand the unique features of each and compare them with others. For instance, wick and water culture systems are simple to set up and are well suited for home growers. However, if growers aim to cultivate a diverse range or large quantity of plants, NFT, aeroponics, or drip systems are more suitable options. A brief assessment of hydroponic techniques is given in Table 1.
Table 1. Comparison of six commonly used hydroponics techniques.
From this comparison, it is evident that each hydroponic technique has distinct strengths and weaknesses relative to the others. Commercial vertical farms, such as Aerofarms, Plenty, and Bowery, primarily use NFT and aeroponics systems in their operations [,,]. Aeroponics, in particular, offers several advantages over the NFT system. One notable benefit is that it utilizes air as the growth medium, facilitating efficient oxygen uptake by exposed roots. This eliminates the risk of algae growth and the need for chemicals or pesticides [,,]. Furthermore, the nutrient-solution spray not only provides nourishment but also acts as a sterilizing agent, safeguarding the roots against diseases. Additionally, aeroponics maximizes the coverage of the root surface area, surpassing other hydroponic methods in this regard [,,,].
In recent advancements, researchers and manufacturers have introduced modified or hybrid versions of the NFT and aeroponic systems. A multilayer NFT system has been developed, comprising interconnected layers of circuits at different levels, resulting in small cascades []. These cascades enhance the oxygenation of the nutrient solution, which is beneficial for plant growth. The three-layer version of this multilayer trough is specifically designed for leafy crops like lettuce, spinach, chard, celery, cabbage, and aromatic plants. In contrast, the four-layer version is well suited for crops with extensive root systems, such as tomato, pepper, zucchini, eggplant, and cucumber. Additionally, a specialized multilayer dual trough model, featuring a superior and two interior levels, has been developed for the unique requirements of strawberry crops. Eldridge et al. [] described the hybrid aeroponic (aero–hydro) system, in which the roots mainly develop in an environment of air or fine mist, while a portion of the roots is submerged in a nutrient solution in the plant bed. In the conventional aeroponic setup, any excess nutrient solution not absorbed by the plants is drained from the plant bed. However, in the hybrid approach, a specific quantity of nutrient solution is retained at the bottom of the plant bed, while the remaining irrigation nutrient solution is allowed to drain out.
An advanced cylindrical hydroponics system employing the revoponics technique has been developed []. This system enhances plant-growth efficiency by rotating plants around a central light source. The technology offers various configurations, including single, double, stacked, and super-container farming systems, designed for cultivating greens, herbs, and specific types of fruits. An innovative approach known as the binary village design has been introduced, featuring a farming center and a habitat ring constructed from durable concrete. Rapid rotation of plants generates gravitational forces, allowing for zero-gravity plant growth. This design promotes a balanced atmosphere by exchanging oxygen in the farm dome with CO2 from the habitat ring, benefiting both plant and human wellbeing while being environmentally sensitive []. These rotary and cylindrical hydroponics systems support high-density crop cultivation, enabling year-round indoor production of leafy greens. The closed-loop systems enhance water and nutrient efficiency, effectively eliminating runoff. However, further trials are needed to determine which indoor crop varieties are best suited for cylindrical hydroponics to ensure successful vertical crop production.
The Radix hydroponic module [] utilizes advanced light recipes and hybrid NFT–DWC irrigation modes to enhance crop yield and quality. Featuring four adjustable light-to-bed heights and an independent lighting system utilizing proprietary LED technology, the module offers over 80 optimized light recipes for more than 300 plant varieties. Its adaptable water levels and gravity-driven circulation facilitate the fusion of NFT and DWC. Alkhalidi et al. [] explored an inventive hybrid of hydroponics and microalgae in a compact two-part shipping container to grow food and produce bioenergy sustainably. A validated mathematical model was used to identify the optimal parameters, including sparger diameter and plant count, for enhanced performance of the integrated system. In another developmental direction, there is an emphasis on plant experience (PX), with a focus on providing diverse vertical farming technologies, including containers as well as nutrient delivery, lighting, and control systems []. This approach includes innovations such as hydrobubble technology, in which irrigation water is infused with microsized gas bubbles for improved oxygenation, nutrient absorption, and root health. Additionally, efforts are under way to develop a comprehensive smart system for remote control and management of vertical farms.

2.3.2. Crop Selection

Crop selection in vertical farming should be strategically determined through feasibility studies, taking into account factors like operating costs and demand. Vertical farms prioritize economically feasible crops like leafy greens, herbs, berries, cherry tomatoes, cucumbers, and microgreens, favoring plants that mature quickly and have short height and specific light needs [,].
These crops are well suited for vertical farming systems like stacked or cylindrical setups, enabling efficient use of vertical space, higher plant numbers, and increased flexibility for crop rotation and management in response to challenges like diseases or pests. Vertical farming systems can also accommodate other crops like tomatoes and peppers, although their larger size and extended growth cycle pose challenges, and nonedible crops like ornamental flowers can also be considered for production []. While commonly used for the cultivation of these crops, vertical farming has the potential for diversification to encompass a wide range of crops. Such expansion could play a pivotal role in advancing sustainable urban agriculture and potentially redefine our approach to food production in the coming years. However, in order to enable the effective cultivation of a diverse range of crops on vertical farms, it is essential to integrate more advanced technologies.

2.3.3. Technological Level

Vertical farming systems have the potential to be implemented in diverse locations. However, costs associated with water supply and temperature-control (cooling or heating) systems can differ significantly depending on the specific environmental context and conditions. The success of indoor vertical farming greatly depends on the efficient use of technology. Technological advancements, including LED lights, sensors, and automation, have revolutionized indoor farming, making it more efficient and tailored to specific crop needs [].
Lighting plays a critical role in the cultivation of crops on vertical farms, particularly artificial lighting such as LEDs, which replace natural sunlight []. Consequently, factors like light intensity and spectral quality have a profound impact on plant growth and development, contributing to enhanced nutritional value and the regulation of essential processes [,]. Among artificial lighting options, LEDs have emerged as the most promising choice for horticulture in controlled environments, offering stability, durability, and the ability to cater to specific light spectra []. Standard LED technology achieves 28% efficiency, but vertical farming demands higher efficiency, ideally 50–60%, for cost-effectiveness [,,]. However, the capacity of LED-based solid-state lighting is progressing, especially with color-mixing technology []. This drives researchers and growers to optimize energy and space by testing various light spectra and crop varieties.
Vertical farming systems offer precise monitoring and control of growth conditions using real-time sensors. Utilizing big data and internet of things (IoT) technology can lead to advanced crop-production knowledge, such as LED lighting and nutrient formulation, through software or firmware applications. Continuous monitoring systems, which measure factors like light, nutrients, and the environment, yield proprietary big data to optimize resource use, reduce cost, and enhance crop quality []. Stored in sensor networks, these data aid in developing AI algorithms for optimal growing recipes and efficiency []. Automation, coupled with IoT, can minimize costs and human involvement in vertical farming. The cost of this approach offsets the initial expenses by using affordable sensors and reduced labor.

2.3.4. Location

Vertical farming systems ensure consistent year-round production regardless of external factors like sunlight or weather. This versatility allows for production almost anywhere, from harsh tundra to arid desert, extending to densely populated urban zones and even outer space. These adaptable production methods can be implemented in various structures, including repurposed tall buildings, basements, growth chambers, and shipping containers [].
The choice of location for an indoor farm significantly impacts its infrastructure and operations. In areas where land costs are prohibitive, indoor farms can be strategically placed in neglected spaces like vacant buildings, underground areas, or areas beneath overpasses []. Being close to cities reduces the use of fossil fuels by minimizing transportation and human travel, leading to the quicker delivery of fresh produce. Integrating nature into urban spaces promotes access to skilled labor and generates local employment opportunities [].

5. Issues and Future Prospects

5.1. Opportunities and Challenges Regarding Crops, the Environment, and Economics

5.1.1. Crop-Production Perspective

Vertical farming presents promising opportunities for cultivating a diverse array of crops, including leafy greens, fruits, vegetables, and flowers, within controlled environments. This technology holds immense potential to ensure year-round, high-quality produce irrespective of external conditions, while optimizing resource consumption [,,]. The controlled setting of virtual farms allows for the exploration of novel crops, pharmaceutical plants, and niche markets, leveraging the advantages of low disease pressure and regulated conditions [,,]. By emphasizing the breeding of improved cultivars with compact growth, shorter growth cycles, and early flowering, vertical farming can enhance resource efficiency and yields [,]. Advanced technologies further empower efficient crop cultivation, while the shift toward environmental modification augments the capacity for agricultural sustainability and resilience []. This technology-driven approach offers the possibility of expanding the horizons of crop cultivation, ensuring food security and enabling novel market opportunities.
Despite its potential, there are challenges in vertical farming in terms of limited crop diversity and the need for specialized cultivars, which affects its adaptability. Breeding improved cultivars with traits like compact growth, shorter growth cycles, and early flowering is essential to address this issue []. While vertical farming allows year-round production and optimized resource utilization, its viability is currently confined to specific crops due to growth cycles, spatial constraints, and economic factors [,]. Therefore, while vertical farming offers substantial advantages, including efficient resource utilization and consistent production, these challenges underscore the need for strategic solutions to broaden its scope and viability across diverse crops.

5.1.2. Environmental Perspective

Vertical farming offers unique opportunities to enhance environmental sustainability in agriculture. This innovative approach has a lower environmental impact in terms of reduced pesticide and nutrient emissions, minimized water and land usage, and decreased food transport mileage [,]. To amplify its role in the food supply chain, it is essential to address initial capital and operational expenses. This can be achieved by refining system design for cost efficiency, optimizing resource utilization, and adopting circular systems []. Developing water-saving recycling techniques and localized irrigation systems and harnessing solar power for clean energy can foster self sufficiency and global accessibility in vertical farming, thereby contributing to a sustainable food future [,].
Vertical farming faces challenges in managing crucial environmental factors. The precise control of temperature, light, humidity, and other factors demands energy-intensive systems. Energy-intensive operations raise sustainability concerns, necessitating optimized energy sourcing. Challenges in air distribution within closely spaced racks can lead to uneven climate, hampering growth. Crop diseases can spread rapidly in confined spaces, necessitating strict disease-management protocols []. Furthermore, the transition from genetic to environmental modification demands advanced technologies and may produce unforeseen ecological impacts []. Overcoming these challenges and advancing the technology to effectively control and adapt to environmental conditions will be instrumental in harnessing the full potential of vertical farming for sustainable and efficient food production.

5.1.3. Economic Perspective

Economic considerations predominantly drive the advancement of vertical farming. While the initial investment is high, advantages like reduced transport, resource efficiency, and climate resilience make vertical farming economically viable in the long run. The controlled environment minimizes susceptibility to pests and diseases, reducing the need for pesticides []. The close proximity to consumers reduces transportation costs, and the adaptability to various crops provides versatility []. The primary drawback of vertical farming is increased electrical energy consumption, but harnessing renewable energy sources can capitalize on the distinct advantages regarding resource utilization, quality enhancement, and automation. Furthermore, cutting-edge automation and AI technologies promise cost reduction, risk mitigation, efficiency, and quality enhancement while optimizing energy-intensive operations [,].
The creation of a vertical farm comes with numerous inherent challenges, both economic and practical []. The main challenge involves conducting a cost–benefit analysis. The cost of urban land hinders urban vertical farming due to energy costs and optimal environmental maintenance challenges []. The considerable initial costs and energy required to construct a vertical farm constitute a fundamental problem, and this may potentially be a reason why vertical farms are not more widespread. Vertical farming also requires substantial investments in nutrient delivery systems, crop-growing platforms, and growth equipment, leading to significantly higher costs, which can be seen as a disadvantage []. Locating suitable urban spaces for vertical farming is challenging due to the limited accessibility of land, but this can be addressed by repurposing vacant buildings []. A high initial investment may be required when acquiring real estate in a central business district to establish a vertical farming operation []. Furthermore, the successful maintenance of vertical farms requires personnel with high levels of expertise in various fields, including plant science, agriculture, agronomy, civil planning, architecture, engineering, economics, and public health []. However, as a solution to future food scarcity, vertical farming is expected to become a trend, and reusing existing building structures will eventually reduce the cost []. Especially in subtropical countries, the adoption of vertical farming can lead to substantial positive economic enhancement []. In the context of globalization, there is an increasing focus on fostering highly adaptable local economies, and urban vertical farming exemplifies this localized initiative, aligning with the broader economic agenda.

5.2. Opportunities and Challenges for Global Food Security

Accelerating urbanization, coupled with the escalating impacts of climate change, land degradation, pandemics, depleted biodiversity, and the extensive utilization of pesticides and fertilizers, has intensified the strain on conventional agricultural systems [,]. In this context, vertical farming has emerged as a strong candidate to address these multifaceted challenges and enhance the production of high-quality agricultural yields []. This innovative agricultural paradigm represents a transformative strategy with the potential to cultivate fresh and nutrient-rich crops in urban landscapes. Vertical farming can boost yields through faster growth, year-round production, and multitier cultivation, enhancing productivity. Despite the current economic limitations, vertical farming is poised for increased adoption as a proactive response to potential food scarcity. Furthermore, the increasing population and spatial limitations are propelling cities toward becoming megacities.
Responding to this trend, designers around the world are advocating for the use of indoor-farming techniques to realize the potential for urban areas to yield substantial quantities of food []. This approach demands less space than conventional farming, fostering urban self-sufficiency in food production while alleviating the strain on land and natural resources []. The integration of vertical farming not only addresses current agricultural challenges but also has the potential for ecosystem restoration, offering a sustainable solution to the evolving demands of growing urban populations.

5.3. Technological Opportunities and Challenges

Vertical farming has emerged as a transformative opportunity, blending advanced technologies and innovative cultivation techniques. The integration of hydroponics, aeroponics, and aquaponics, coupled with the precision management of water and nutrients, offers efficient space utilization and reduced environmental impact []. Advanced technologies such as AI, sensors, and automation enable precise growth control, reducing resource waste and increasing yields [,,]. With controlled indoor-environment crop cultivation, rapid progress is evident in the evolution of automation, robotics, and artificial intelligence. These advancements enhance food self sufficiency, increase crop yields, and address the challenges of traditional agriculture [], making vertical farming a promising solution for sustainable food production.
Vertical farming, while promising, faces several technological challenges. The complex integration of cultivation systems in confined spaces demands precise management of water, nutrient delivery, and potential leaks. Maintaining uniform irrigation across multiple tiers is crucial and requires advanced sensor networks and streamlined automation. A synergy between advanced technology and skilled labor is vital, yet there is a shortage of adequately trained personnel. The initial investment is substantial, and the challenges include adapting robotics and automation for delicate crops while maintaining consistent performance []. Managing lighting systems for optimal plant growth without producing negative effects is also complex []. Furthermore, integrating diverse data streams from sensors demands meticulous calibration and rapid adaptive responses, which involves significant challenges []. Challenges also arise from variations among fruits and crops, impacting the effectiveness of robotic systems []. However, the potential of vertical farming to enable resource-efficient production, reduced transportation, and controlled environments provides opportunities to overcome the challenges and revolutionize modern agriculture.

6. Conclusions

Vertical farming is a modern agricultural approach that offers exceptional space efficiency, in contrast to conventional farming methods that often result in water wastage and land degradation. The key advantages of vertical farming include the recirculation of freshwater to minimize waste, the optimization of growth conditions for steady year-round harvests, and the ability to sidestep seasonal limitations. These urban-based farms employ advanced technologies to reduce costs by decreasing the need for transportation and labor expenses. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that the realization of vertical farming within urban domains is accompanied by a set of intricate challenges that require careful consideration and strategic resolution. Figure 14 provides a concise overview of the prospects and challenges associated with vertical farming in sustainable food production.
Figure 14. Prospects and challenges of sustainable food production in an urban area.
One of the primary challenges of vertical farming is the substantial expense involved in setup and operation. The infrastructure required for vertical farming, such as controlled environment chambers, advanced lighting systems, and automation technologies, can be costly to install and maintain. Additionally, the increased energy usage of vertical farming operations is a significant concern. A crucial factor contributing to the energy demand is the use of photosynthetic LED lighting, which is essential for plant growth in indoor environments. While renewable energy sources can help mitigate some of the energy-related challenges, they may not always ensure complete farm self-sufficiency, especially if they are incompatible with specific indoor setups. Furthermore, certain crops, such as leafy greens, are better suited for the sustainability goals of vertical farming. Still, challenges arise with cereal crops due to the difficulty in stacking plants and the intense light requirements for their growth.
In contrast, traditional agriculture is struggling to meet rising global food demands due to climate-related factors affecting crop yields and quality. To address this, optimizing the sustainability of farming methods could make traditional practices more efficient despite their significant environmental consequences. While an immediate shift to efficient vertical farming methods would be challenging, a gradual approach that integrates low-carbon methods may align with increasing food needs more sustainably. The feasibility of urban vertical farming has greatly improved in recent years due to emerging technologies. High costs hindered the viability of such farming methods in the past, but the integration of sensors, AI, and robots has transformed the agricultural landscape. Cameras and sensors are employed to monitor factors such as plant growth and disease, with AI analyzing the collected data and providing remedies. Meanwhile, robots have taken on tasks related to harvesting and tending to crops. These technological advancements have significantly reduced the need for human intervention, setting vertical farming apart from conventional practices and safeguarding its economic viability in urban settings.
Vertical farming lacks industry-wide standardization and sustainability certifications due to its evolving technologies and competitive innovations. Establishing standards would enable performance analysis and the dissemination of innovations across the vertical farming industry. Despite the drawbacks and challenges, vertical farms have the potential to promote sustainability, alleviate hunger, and provide local economic support. As technology continues to enhance the efficiency of vertical farming, discussions and debates are initiated about transforming agriculture into a greener, more efficient way of cultivating food, thereby addressing global food demand in a sustainable manner.
Vertical farming is a sustainable and efficient response to the challenges posed by increasing global food demand. Its ability to overcome spatial limitations, ensure year-round production, conserve resources, and embrace technological advancements positions vertical farming as a key player in shaping the future of agriculture. The success and popularity of vertical farming depend on dealing with various regional factors. Local weather, cultural practices, available technology, economic conditions, and government support all contribute to the unique challenges and opportunities encountered by vertical farming initiatives worldwide.
This review explores the dynamic field of vertical farming, covering concepts, classifications, and technological trends, including sensors, IoT, robotics, and AI integration. The assessment extends globally, evaluating the current status of vertical farming as well as the regional technological trends and their impact. In addition, it examines challenges and opportunities in crop production, environmental sustainability, and economic viability, addressing global food security. The aim of this review is to provide a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers seeking to understand and navigate this dynamic field, offering key insights for its future development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S.N.K. and S.-O.C.; methodology, M.S.N.K. and S.-O.C.; validation, M.N.R., M.C. and M.A.; formal analysis, M.S.N.K., M.N.R. and M.C.; investigation, M.S.N.K., M.N.R. and K.Y.L.; resources, S.-O.C.; data curation, S., M.R.A. and K.Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.N.K.; writing—review and editing, M.N.R., M.C., M.A. and S.-O.C.; visualization, S. and M.R.A.; supervision, S.-O.C.; project administration, S.-O.C.; funding acquisition, S.-O.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the research fund of Chungnam National University.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors express gratitude to the National Research Foundation of Korea for their support through the Brain Pool program (project no. 2022H1D3A2A01096440) under the Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results (UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO.3); United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420); United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. Vollset, S.E.; Goren, E.; Yuan, C.-W.; Cao, J.; Smith, A.E.; Hsiao, T.; Bisignano, C.; Azhar, G.S.; Castro, E.; Chalek, J.; et al. Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: A forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020, 396, 1285–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Saad, M.H.M.; Hamdan, N.M.; Sarker, M.R. State of the art of urban smart vertical farming automation system: Advanced topologies, issues and recommendations. Electronics 2021, 10, 1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Beacham, A.M.; Vickers, L.H.; Monaghan, J.M. Vertical farming: A summary of approaches to growing skywards. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 94, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ragaveena, S.; Shirly Edward, A.; Surendran, U. Smart controlled environment agriculture methods: A holistic review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 20, 887–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gan, C.I.; Soukoutou, R.; Conroy, D.M. Sustainability framing of controlled environment agriculture and consumer perceptions: A review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Engler, N.; Krarti, M. Review of energy efficiency in controlled environment agriculture. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 141, 110786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, G.O.; Jang, S.-N.; Kim, M.J.; Cho, D.Y.; Cho, K.M.; Lee, J.H.; Son, K.-H. Comparison of growth patterns and metabolite composition of different ginseng cultivars (Yunpoong and K-1) grown in a vertical farm. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nájera, C.; Gallegos-Cedillo, V.M.; Ros, M.; Pascual, J.A. Role of spectrum-light on productivity, and plant quality over vertical farming systems: Bibliometric analysis. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Statista. Global Vertical Farming Market Projection 2022–2032. 2023. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/487666/projection-vertical-farming-market-worldwide/ (accessed on 7 August 2023).
  12. Li, H.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, H.; Wang, Y.; Chow, D. Towards automated greenhouse: A state of the art review on greenhouse monitoring methods and technologies based on internet of things. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 191, 106558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vatistas, C.; Avgoustaki, D.D.; Bartzanas, T. A systematic literature review on controlled-environment agriculture: How vertical farms and greenhouses can influence the sustainability and footprint of urban microclimate with local food production. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Oh, S.; Lu, C. Vertical farming—Smart urban agriculture for enhancing resilience and sustainability in food security. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2023, 98, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kalantari, F.; Mohd Tahir, O.; Mahmoudi Lahijani, A.; Kalantari, S. A review of vertical farming technology: A guide for implementation of building integrated agriculture in cities. Adv. Eng. Forum 2017, 24, 76–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Al-Kodmany, K. The Vertical Farm: A review of developments and implications for the vertical city. Buildings 2018, 8, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sandison, F.; Yeluripati, J.; Stewart, D. Does green vertical farming offer a sustainable alternative to conventional methods of production?: A case study from Scotland. Food Energy Secur. 2023, 12, e438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yuan, G.N.; Marquez, G.P.B.; Deng, H.; Iu, A.; Fabella, M.; Salonga, R.B.; Ashardiono, F.; Cartagena, J.A. A review on urban agriculture: Technology, socio-economy, and policy. Heliyon 2022, 8, e11583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kozai, T. Towards sustainable plant factories with artificial lighting (PFALs) for achieving SDGs. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2019, 12, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kalantari, F.; Tahir, O.T.; Joni, R.A.; Aminuldin, N.A. The importance of the public acceptance theory in determining the success of the vertical farming projects. Manag. Res. Pract. 2018, 10, 5–16. [Google Scholar]
  21. Despommier, D. Vertical Farms in Horticulture. In Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics; Thompson, P.B., Kaplan, D.M., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Banerjee, C.; Adenaeuer, L. Up, up and away! The economics of vertical farming. J. Agric. Stud. 2014, 2, 40–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Van Gerrewey, T.; Boon, N.; Geelen, D. Vertical Farming: The only way is up? Agronomy 2022, 12, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Waldron, D. Evolution of vertical farms and the development of a simulation methodology. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 2018, 217, 975–986. [Google Scholar]
  25. Despommier, D. The Vertical Farm: Feeding the World in the 21st Century; St. Martin’s Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 11–16. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kozai, T.; Niu, G. Introduction: Overview and concept of closed plant production system (CPPS). In Plant Factory: An Indoor Vertical Farming System for Efficient Quality Food Production, 2nd ed.; Kozai, T., Niu, G., Takagaki, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Despommier, D. Vertical farms, building a viable indoor farming model for cities. Field Actions Sci. Rep. 2019, 20, 68–73. Available online: http://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/5737 (accessed on 15 January 2023).
  28. Benke, K.; Tomkins, B. Future food-production systems: Vertical farming and controlledenvironment agriculture. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 2017, 13, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Despommier, D. The rise of vertical farms. Sci. Am. 2009, 301, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Al-Chalabi, M. Vertical farming: Skyscraper sustainability? Sustain. Cities Soc. 2015, 18, 74–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fischetti, M. Growing vertical: Skyscraper farming. Sci. Am. 2008, 18, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Benis, K.; Reinhart, C.; Ferrão, P. Building-Integrated Agriculture (BIA) in urban contexts: Testing a simulation-based decision support workflow. In Proceedings of the 15th International Building Performance Simulation Association (IBPSA) Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 7–9 August 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shamshiri, R.R.; Kalantari, F.; Ting, K.C.; Thorp, K.R.; Hameed, I.A.; Weltzien, C.; Ahmad, D.; Shad, Z.M. Advances in greenhouse automation and controlled environment agriculture: A transition to plant factories and urban agriculture. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2018, 11, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kozai, T. Resource use efficiency of closed plant production system with artificial light: Concept, estimation and application to plant factory. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 2013, 89, 447–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Butturini, M.; Marcelis, L.F.M. Vertical farming in Europe: Present status and outlook. In Plant Factory: An Indoor Vertical Farming System for Efficient Quality Food Production, 2nd ed.; Kozai, T., Niu, G., Takagaki, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. SharathKumar, M.; Heuvelink, E.; Marcelis, L.F.M. Vertical farming: Moving from genetic to environmental modification. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 724–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chole, A.S.; Jadhav, A.R.; Shinde, V. Vertical farming: Controlled environment agriculture. Just Agric. 2021, 1, 249–256. Available online: https://justagriculture.in/files/newsletter/2021/jan/055.pdf (accessed on 9 August 2023).
  38. Chaudhry, A.R.; Mishra, V.P. A comparative analysis of vertical agriculture systems in residential apartments. In Proceedings of the 2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 26 March–10 April 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kozai, T.; Niu, G. Plant factory as a resourceefficient closed plant production system. In Plant Factory: An Indoor Vertical Farming System for Efficient Quality Food Production, 2nd ed.; Kozai, T., Niu, G., Takagaki, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 93–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kozai, T. Current Status of Plant Factories with Artificial Lighting (PFALs) and Smart PFALs. In Smart Plant Factory—The Next Generation Indoor Vertical Farms; Kozai, T., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wong, C.E.; Teo, Z.W.N.; Shen, L.; Yu, H. Seeing the lights for leafy greens in indoor vertical farming. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 106, 48–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Son, J.E.; Kim, H.J.; Ahn, T.I. Hydroponic systems. In Plant Factory: An Indoor Vertical Farming System for Efficient Quality Food Production, 2nd ed.; Kozai, T., Niu, G., Takagaki, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. van Delden, S.H.; SharathKumar, M.; Butturini, M.; Graamans, L.J.A.; Heuvelink, E.; Kacira, M.; Kaiser, E.; Klamer, R.S.; Klerkx, L.; Kootstra, G.; et al. Current status and future challenges in implementing and upscaling vertical farming systems. Nat. Food 2021, 2, 944–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Maucieri, C.; Nicoletto, C.; Os, E.V.; Anseeuw, D.; Havermaet, R.V.; Junge, R. Hydroponic technologies. In Aquaponics Food Production Systems; Goddek, S., Joyce, A., Kotzen, B., Burnell, G.M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 77–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Eldridge, B.M.; Manzoni, L.R.; Graham, C.A.; Rodgers, B.; Farmer, J.R.; Dodd, A.N. Getting to the roots of aeroponic indoor farming. New Phytol. 2020, 228, 1183–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lakhiar, I.A.; Gao, J.M.; Syed, T.N.; Chandio, F.A.; Tunio, M.H.; Ahmad, F. Overview of the aeroponic agriculture—An emerging technology for global food security. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2020, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Aerofarms. Available online: https://aerofarms.com/ (accessed on 26 August 2023).
  48. Plenty. Available online: https://www.plenty.ag/ (accessed on 26 August 2023).
  49. Bowery. Available online: https://bowery.co/ (accessed on 26 August 2023).
  50. Pala, M.; Mizenko, L.; Mach, M.; Reed, T. Aeroponic greenhouse as an autonomous system using intelligent space for agriculture robotics. In Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications 2: Results from the 2nd International Conference on Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications; Kim, J.H., Matson, E., Myung, H., Xu, P., Karray, F., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lakhiar, I.A.; Gao, J.; Syed, T.N.; Chandio, F.A.; Buttar, N.A. Modern plant cultivation technologies in agriculture under controlled environment: A review on aeroponics. J. Plant Interact. 2018, 13, 338–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chowdhury, M.; Islam, M.N.; Reza, M.N.; Ali, M.; Rasool, K.; Kiraga, S.; Lee, D.L.; Chung, S.O. Sensor-based nutrient recirculation for aeroponic lettuce cultivation. J. Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 46, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tunio, M.H.; Gao, J.; Shaikh, S.A.; Lakhiar, I.A.; Qureshi, W.A.; Solangi, K.A.; Chandio, F.A. Potato production in aeroponics: An emerging food growing system in sustainable agriculture forfood security. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2020, 80, 118–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. NGS. New Growing System. Available online: https://ngsystem.com (accessed on 8 April 2023).
  55. Omega Garden™. Hydroponics Design. Available online: https://omegagarden.com/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
  56. Farmdominium™. The Farmdominium™ Concept. Available online: https://omegagarden.com/the-farmdominium/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
  57. Sananbio. Indoor Vertical Hydroponic Vegetation Cultivation Module. Available online: https://www.sananbiofarm.com/product/indoor-vertical-hydroponic-vegetation-cultivation-module (accessed on 10 July 2023).
  58. Alkhalidi, A.; Jarah, H.; Khawaja, M.K. Innovative design for a portable hybrid system of hydroponic and microalgae to produce food and biofuels. Clean Energy 2022, 6, 412–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lambert, A. Plant Experience (PX) for Vertical Farming 2.0. Liberty Produce. 28 March 2022. Available online: https://www.liberty-produce.com/post/px-for-vertical-farming (accessed on 9 May 2023).
  60. Pocock, T. Light-emitting diodes and the modulation of specialty crops: Light sensing and signaling networks in plants. HortScience 2015, 50, 1281–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pattison, P.; Tsao, J.; Brainard, G.; Bugbee, B. LEDs for photons, physiology and food. Nature 2018, 563, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bantis, F.; Smirnakou, S.; Ouzounis, T.; Koukounaras, A.; Ntagkas, N.; Radoglou, K. Current status and recent achievements in the field of horticulture with the use of light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Sci. Hortic. 2018, 235, 437–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nwoba, E.G.; Parlevliet, D.A.; Laird, D.W.; Alameh, K.; Moheimani, N.R. Light management technologies for increasing algal photobioreactor efficiency. Algal Res. 2019, 39, 101433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rehman, A.-U.; Abbasi, A.Z.; Islam, N.; Shaikh, Z.A. A review of wireless sensors and networks’ applications in agriculture. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 2014, 36, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Singh, N.; Singh, A.N. Odysseys of agriculture sensors: Current challenges and forthcoming prospects. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 171, 105328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sivamani, S.; Bae, N.; Cho, Y. A smart service model based on ubiquitous sensor networks using vertical farm ontology. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2013, 9, 161495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lakhiar, I.A.; Jianmin, G.; Syed, T.N.; Chandio, F.A.; Buttar, N.A.; Qureshi, W.A. Monitoring and control systems in agriculture using intelligent sensor techniques: A review of the aeroponic system. J. Sens. 2018, 2018, 8672769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dhanaraju, M.; Chenniappan, P.; Ramalingam, K.; Pazhanivelan, S.; Kaliaperumal, R. Smart farming: Internet of things (IoT)-based sustainable agriculture. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kato, K.; Yoshida, R.; Kikuzaki, A.; Hirai, T.; Kuroda, H.; Hiwasa-Tanase, K.; Takane, K.; Ezura, H.; Mizoguchi, T. Molecular breeding of tomato lines for mass production of miraculin in a plant factory. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 9505–9510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Borgognone, D.; Colla, G.; Rouphael, Y.; Cardarelli, M.; Rea, E.; Schwarz, D. Effect of nitrogen form and nutrient solution pH on growth and mineral composition of self-grafted and grafted tomatoes. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 149, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Trejo-Téllez, L.I.; Gómez-Merino, F.C. Nutrient solutions for hydroponic systems. In Hydroponics—A Standard Methodology for Plant Biological Researches; Toshiki, A., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  72. Bamsey, M.; Graham, T.; Thompson, C.; Berinstain, A.; Scott, A.; Dixon, M. Ion-specific nutrient management in closed systems: The necessity for ion-selective sensors in terrestrial and space-based agriculture and water management systems. Sensors 2012, 12, 13349–13392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kim, H.J.; Kim, W.K.; Roh, M.Y.; Kang, C.I.; Park, J.M.; Sudduth, K.A. Automated sensing of hydroponic macronutrients using a computer-controlled system with an array of ion-selective electrodes. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2013, 93, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Chowdhury, M.; Jang, B.E.; Kabir, M.S.N.; Kim, Y.J.; Na, K.D.; Park, S.B.; Chung, S.O. Factors affecting the accuracy and precision of ion-selective electrodes for hydroponic nutrient supply systems. Acta Hortic. 2020, 1296, 997–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chowdhury, M.; Jang, B.E.; Kabir, M.S.N.; Lee, D.H.; Kim, H.T.; Park, T.S.; Chung, S.O. Performance evaluation of commercial ion-selective electrodes for hydroponic cultivation system. Acta Hortic. 2020, 1296, 831–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jung, D.H.; Kim, H.J.; Choi, G.L.; Ahn, T.I.; Son, J.E.; Sudduth, K.A. Automated lettuce nutrient solution management using an array of ion-selective electrodes. Trans. ASABE 2015, 58, 1309–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Asaduzzaman, M.; Asao, T. Autotoxicity in strawberry under recycled hydroponics and its mitigation methods. Hortic. J. 2020, 89, 124–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gutiérrez, M.; Alegret, S.; Caceres, R.; Casadesús, J.; Marfa, O.; Del Valle, M. Application of a potentiometric electronic tongue to fertigation strategy in greenhouse cultivation. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2007, 57, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jung, D.-H.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, H.S.; Choi, J.; Kim, J.D.; Park, S.H. Fusion of Spectroscopy and Cobalt Electrochemistry Data for Estimating Phosphate Concentration in Hydroponic Solution. Sensors 2019, 19, 2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Jung, D.H.; Kim, H.J.; Cho, W.J.; Park, S.H.; Yang, S.H. Validation testing of an ion-specific sensing and control system for precision hydroponic macronutrient management. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 156, 660–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Tuan, V.N.; Khattak, A.M.; Zhu, H.; Gao, W.; Wang, M. Combination of multivariate standard addition technique and deep kernel learning model for determining multi-ion in hydroponic nutrient solution. Sensors 2020, 20, 5314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tuan, V.N.; Dinh, T.D.; Khattak, A.M.; Zheng, L.; Chu, X.; Gao, W.; Wang, M. Multivariate standard addition cobalt electrochemistry data fusion for determining phosphate concentration in hydroponic solution. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 28289–28300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zheng, S.; Liu, K.; Xu, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y. Robust soft sensor with deep kernel learning for quality prediction in rubber mixing processes. Sensors 2020, 20, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cho, W.-J.; Kim, H.-J.; Jung, D.-H.; Han, H.-J.; Cho, Y.-Y. Hybrid signal-processing method based on neural network for prediction of NO3, K, Ca, and Mg ions in hydroponic solutions using an array of ion-selective electrodes. Sensors 2019, 19, 5508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Rousseau, C.R.; Bühlmann, P. Calibration-free potentiometric sensing with solid-contact ion-selective electrodes. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2021, 140, 116277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Qi, L.; Liang, R.; Jiang, T.; Qin, W. Anti-fouling polymeric membrane ion-selective electrodes. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2022, 150, 116572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Popkova, E.G. Vertical farms based on hydroponics, deep learning, and AI as smart innovation in agriculture. In Smart Innovation in Agriculture; Popkova, E.G., Sergi, B.S., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. de Abreu, C.L.; van Deventer, J.P. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) and internet of things (IoT) in Agriculture: A systematic literature review. In Artificial Intelligence Research; Communications in Computer and Information Science; Jembere, E., Gerber, A.J., Viriri, S., Pillay, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 1551, pp. 32–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ramakrishnam Raju, S.V.S.; Dappuri, B.; Ravi Kiran Varma, P.; Yachamaneni, M.; Verghese, D.M.G.; Mishra, M.K. Design and implementation of smart hydroponics farming using IoT-based AI controller with mobile application system. J. Nanomater. 2022, 2022, 4435591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lowe, M.; Qin, R.; Mao, X. A review on machine learning, artificial intelligence, and smart technology in water treatment and monitoring. Water 2022, 14, 1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Qazi, S.; Khawaja, B.A.; Farooq, Q.U. IoT-equipped and AI-enabled next generation smart agriculture: A critical review, current challenges and future trends. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 21219–21235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Crisnapati, P.N.; Wardana, I.N.K.; Aryanto, I.K.A.A.; Hermawan, A. Hommons: Hydroponic management and moni-toring system for an IOT based NFT farm using web technology. In Proceedings of the 2017 5th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), Denpasar, Indonesia, 8–10 August 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ullah, R.; Asghar, I.; Griffiths, M.G.; Stacey, C.; Stiles, W.; Whitelaw, C. Internet of things based sensor system for vertical farming and controlled environment agriculture. In Proceedings of the 2023 6th Conference on Cloud and Internet of Things (CIoT), Lisbon, Portugal, 20–22 March 2023; pp. 136–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kaur, G.; Upadhyaya, P.; Chawla, P. Comparative analysis of IoT-based controlled environment and uncontrolled environment plant growth monitoring system for hydroponic indoor vertical farm. Environ. Res. 2023, 222, 115313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Morella, P.; Lambán, M.P.; Royo, J.; Sánchez, J.C. Vertical farming monitoring: How does it work and how much does it cost? Sensors 2023, 23, 3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chowdhury, M.E.H.; Khandakar, A.; Ahmed, S.; Al-Khuzaei, F.; Hamdalla, J.; Haque, F.; Reaz, M.B.I.; Al Shafei, A.; Al-Emadi, N. Design, construction and testing of IoT based automated indoor vertical hydroponics farming test-bed in Qatar. Sensors 2020, 20, 5637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Quy, V.K.; Hau, N.V.; Anh, D.V.; Quy, N.M.; Ban, N.T.; Lanza, S.; Randazzo, G.; Muzirafuti, A. IoT-enabled smart agriculture: Architecture, applications, and challenges. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Dutta, M.; Gupta, D.; Sahu, S.; Limkar, S.; Singh, P.; Mishra, A.; Kumar, M.; Mutlu, R. Evaluation of growth responses of lettuce and energy efficiency of the substrate and smart hydroponics cropping system. Sensors 2023, 23, 1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Rezk, N.G.; Hemdan, E.E.-D.; Attia, A.-F.; El-Sayed, A.; El-Rashidy, M.A. An efficient IoT based smart farming system using machine learning algorithms. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2021, 80, 773–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Grinblat, G.L.; Uzal, L.C.; Larese, M.G.; Granitto, P.M. Deep learning for plant identification using vein morphological patterns. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2016, 127, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mehra, M.; Saxena, S.; Sankaranarayanan, S.; Tom, R.J.; Veeramanikandan, M. IoT based hydroponics system using deep neural networks. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 155, 473–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Franchetti, B.; Ntouskos, V.; Giuliani, P.; Herman, T.; Barnes, L.; Pirri, F. Vision based modeling of plants phenotyping in vertical farming under artificial lighting. Sensors 2019, 19, 4378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Schima, R.; Mollenhauer, H.; Grenzdörffer, G.; Merbach, I.; Lausch, A.; Dietrich, P.; Bumberger, J. Imagine all the plants: Evaluation of a light-field camera for on-site crop growth monitoring. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Paulus, S.; Behmann, J.; Mahlein, A.-K.; Plümer, L.; Kuhlmann, H. Low-cost 3D systems: Suitable tools for plant phenotyping. Sensors 2014, 14, 3001–3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Mavridou, E.; Vrochidou, E.; Papakostas, G.A.; Pachidis, T.; Kaburlasos, V.G. Machine vision systems in precision agriculture for crop farming. J. Imaging 2019, 5, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Jiang, G.Q.; Zhao, C.J.; Si, Y.S. A machine vision based crop rows detection for agricultural robots. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Wavelet Analysis and Pattern Recognition, Qingdao, China, 11–14 July 2010; pp. 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Paul, K.; Chatterjee, S.S.; Pai, P.; Varshney, A.; Juikar, S.; Prasad, V.; Bhadra, B.; Dasgupta, S. Viable smart sensors and their application in data driven agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 198, 107096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pérez-Bueno, M.L.; Pineda, M.; Barón, M. Phenotyping plant responses to biotic stress by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Zahir, S.A.D.M.; Omar, A.F.; Jamlos, M.F.; Azmi, M.A.M.; Muncan, J. A review of visible and near-infrared (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy application in plant stress detection. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 2022, 338, 113468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Brzychczyk, B.; Hebda, T.; Fitas, J.; Giełżecki, J. The follow-up photobioreactor illumination system for the cultivation of photosynthetic microorganisms. Energies 2020, 13, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bagha, H.; Yavari, A.; Georgakopoulos, D. IoT-based plant health analysis using optical sensors in precision agriculture. In Proceedings of the 2021 Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA), Gold Coast, Australia, 29 November–1 December 2021; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Qu, C.C.; Sun, X.Y.; Sun, W.X.; Cao, L.X.; Wang, X.Q.; He, Z.Z. Flexible wearables for plants. Small 2021, 17, 2104482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Gupta, S.; Huang, C.H.; Singh, G.P.; Park, B.S.; Chua, N.H.; Ram, R.J. Portable Raman leaf-clip sensor for rapid detection of plant stress. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wang, T.; Xu, X.; Wang, C.; Li, Z.; Li, D. From smart farming towards unmanned farms: A new mode of agricultural production. Agriculture 2021, 11, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Avgoustaki, D.D.; Avgoustakis, I.; Miralles, C.C.; Sohn, J.; Xydis, G. Autonomous mobile robot with attached multispectral camera to monitor the development of crops and detect nutrient and water deficiencies in vertical farms. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Blom, T.; Jenkins, A.; Pulselli, R.M.; Van den Dobbelsteen, A.A.J.F. The embodied carbon emissions of lettuce production in vertical farming, greenhouse horticulture, and open-field farming in the Netherlands. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 377, 134443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kozai, T.; Niu, G. Role of the plant factory with artificial lighting (PFAL) in urban areas. In Plant Factory: An Indoor Vertical Farming System for Efficient Quality Food Production, 2nd ed.; Kozai, T., Niu, G., Takagaki, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Eagle Technologies. Use Cases of Factory Automation in Vertical Farming. Factory Automation Food Processing. 2020. Available online: https://eagletechnologies.com/2020/08/03/6-use-cases-of-factory-automation-in-vertical-farming/ (accessed on 12 January 2023).
  119. CityCrop. Automated Indoor Farming. Available online: https://citycrop.io/ (accessed on 13 February 2023).
  120. Eponic Agriculture Co. Ltd. A Fully Automated Three-Dimensional Vertical Farm Comes into Operation. Available online: https://www.igrowpreowned.com/igrownews/a-fully-automated-three-dimensional-vertical-farm-comes-into-operation (accessed on 16 June 2023).
  121. GreenCUBE. Automated Vertical Farming System. Available online: https://tytcorp.com.sg/vertical-cultivation-system/automated-vertical-farming-system (accessed on 18 July 2023).
  122. iFarm. iFarm StackGrow Vertical Farming Automation Technology. Available online: https://ifarm.fi/technologies/stack-grow (accessed on 16 July 2023).
  123. Seasony. Making the Future of Vertical Farming Profitable, Scaleable, & Sustainable. Available online: https://seasony.io/ (accessed on 12 May 2023).
  124. Organifarms. Strawberry Harvesting Robot. 2022. Available online: https://www.organifarms.de/product (accessed on 12 December 2022).
  125. IGS. Intelligent Growth Solutions (IGS) Ltd. Growth Towers for Indoor Farming: Fully Automated Year Round Growing. Available online: https://www.intelligentgrowthsolutions.com/product/growth-towers (accessed on 15 June 2023).
  126. Badia Farms. The Farm Of The Future, Today. 2018. Available online: https://www.badiafarms.com/ (accessed on 12 May 2023).
  127. Techno Farm. Innovation: Vegetable Factory. 2023. Available online: https://www.technofarm.com/en/innovation/ (accessed on 16 March 2023).
  128. A-Plus. Farm & Factory TAMURA Plant Factory, Fukushima, Japan. 2021. Available online: https://www.a-plus-tamura.com/farm-factory (accessed on 18 April 2023).
  129. Hornayek, T. Chiba Sees Farming Revolution Budding Underground. 2019. Available online: https://shingetsunewsagency.com/2019/02/26/chiba-sees-farming-revolution-budding-underground/ (accessed on 12 February 2023).
  130. SANANBIO. Available online: https://www.sananbio.com/ (accessed on 26 February 2023).
  131. Allinson, M. Future of Agriculture: What Does Automated Vertical Farming Look Like? 2023. Available online: https://roboticsandautomationnews.com/2023/03/10/future-of-agriculture-what-does-automated-vertical-farming-look-like/64840/ (accessed on 16 July 2023).
  132. iFarm. Available online: https://ifarm.fi/ (accessed on 2 March 2023).
  133. Iron Ox. Available online: http://ironox.com/ (accessed on 5 March 2023).
  134. IGS. Intelligent Growth Solutions (IGS). Available online: https://www.intelligentgrowthsolutions.com/ (accessed on 10 March 2023).
  135. Urban Crop Solution. Available online: https://urbancropsolutions.com/ (accessed on 7 March 2023).
  136. Lardinois, F. Iron Ox Opens Its First Fully Autonomous Farm. 4 October 2018. Available online: https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/03/iron-ox-opens-its-first-fully-autonomous-farm/ (accessed on 18 August 2023).
  137. Marchant, W.; Tosunoglu, S. Robotic implementation to automate a vertical farm system. In Proceedings of the 30st Florida Conference on Recent Advances in Robotics, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 11–12 May 2107; Available online: https://public.eng.fau.edu/design/fcrar2017/papers/RoboticImplementation.pdf (accessed on 12 February 2023).
  138. AgritechTomorrow, Future Crops Brings Vertical Farming Closer to the Land. 2021. Available online: https://www.agritechtomorrow.com/story/2021/12/future-crops-brings-vertical-farming-closer-to-the-land/13356/ (accessed on 10 January 2023).
  139. AgriTech. Top 10 Agriculture Trends, Technologies & Innovations for 2023. 2023. Available online: https://www.startus-insights.com/innovators-guide/agriculture-trends-innovation/ (accessed on 16 July 2023).
  140. Nokia Bell Labs. Available online: https://www.bell-labs.com/ (accessed on 28 February 2023).
  141. ChemistryViews. Vertical Farming with Drones. Wiley-VCH GmbH. 11 August 2021. Available online: https://www.chemistryviews.org/details/news/11313637/Vertical_Farming_With_Drones/ (accessed on 2 March 2023).
  142. iFarm. Autonomous Drones Will Help to Observe Plants. Available online: https://ifarm.fi/dron_on_farm (accessed on 18 August 2023).
  143. Corvus Drones. Available online: https://www.corvusdrones.com/ (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  144. Arugga—AI Farming. Available online: https://www.arugga.com/ (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  145. Glick, M. Robotic Bees Could Support Vertical Farms Today and Astronauts Tomorrow. Sci. Am. 17 July 2023. Available online: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/robotic-bees-could-support-vertical-farms-today-and-astronauts-tomorrow/ (accessed on 21 May 2023).
  146. Siropyan, M.; Celikel, O.; Pinarer, O. Artificial Intelligence Driven Vertical Farming Management System. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, London, UK, 6–8 July 2022; Available online: https://www.iaeng.org/publication/WCE2022/WCE2022_pp108-113.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2023).
  147. Talaviya, T.; Shah, D.; Patel, N.; Yagnik, H.; Shah, M. Implementation of artificial intelligence in agriculture for optimisation of irrigation and application of pesticides and herbicides. Artif. Intell. Agric. 2020, 4, 58–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Hwang, Y.; Lee, S.; Kim, T.; Baik, K.; Choi, Y. Crop growth monitoring system in vertical farms based on region-of-interest prediction. Agriculture 2022, 12, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Vorapatratorn, S. Development of Automatic Plant Factory Control Systems with AI-Based Artificial Lighting. In Proceedings of the 2021 13th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE), Chiang Mai, Thailand, 14–15 October 2021; pp. 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Rizkiana, A.; Nugroho, A.P.; Salma, N.M.; Afif, S.; Masithoh, R.E.; Sutiarso, L.; Okayasu, T. Plant growth prediction model for lettuce (Lactuca sativa.) in plant factories using artificial neural network. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 733, 012027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Story, D.; Kacira, M.; Kubota, C.; Akoglu, A.; An, L. Lettuce calcium deficiency detection with machine vision computed plant features in controlled environments. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2010, 74, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Hao, X.; Jia, J.; Gao, W.; Guo, X.; Zhang, W.; Zheng, L.; Wang, M. MFC-CNN: An automatic grading scheme for light stress levels of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) leaves. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 179, 105847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Sun, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, G.; Zhang, H. Deep learning for plant identification in natural environment. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2017, 2017, 7361042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Gozzovelli, R.; Franchetti, B.; Bekmurat, M.; Pirri, F. Tip-burn stress detection of lettuce canopy grown in Plant Factories. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, BC, Canada, 11–17 October 2021; pp. 1259–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Wu, Z.; Yang, R.; Gao, F.; Wang, W.; Fu, L.; Li, R. Segmentation of abnormal leaves of hydroponic lettuce based on DeepLabV3+ for robotic sorting. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 190, 106443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Hendrawan, Y.; Damayanti, R.; Al Riza, D.F.; Hermanto, M.B. Classification of water stress in cultured Sunagoke moss using deep learning. TELKOMNIKA Telecommun. Comput. Electron. Control 2021, 19, 1594–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Lee, U.; Chang, S.; Putra, G.A.; Kim, H.; Kim, D.H. An automated, high-throughput plant phenotyping system using machine learning-based plant segmentation and image analysis. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0196615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Lauguico, S.; Concepcion, R.; Tobias, R.R.; Alejandrino, J.; Guia, J.D.; Guillermo, M.; Sybingco, E.; Dadios, E. Machine Vision-Based Prediction of Lettuce Phytomorphological Descriptors using Deep Learning Networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE 12th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM), Manila, Philippines, 3–7 December 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Moshou, D.; Pantazi, X.E.; Kateris, D.; Gravalos, I. Water stress detection based on optical multisensor fusion with a least squares support vector machine classifier. Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 117, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Kim, S.; Lee, M.; Shin, C. IoT-based strawberry disease prediction system for smart farming. Sensors 2018, 18, 4051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Anubhove, M.S.T.; Ashrafi, N.; Saleque, A.M.; Akter, M.; Saif, S.U. Machine learning algorithm based disease detection in tomato with automated image telemetry for vertical farming. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Performance Evaluation (ComPE), Shillong, India, 2–4 July 2020; pp. 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Alejandrino, J.; Concepcion, R.; Lauguico, S.; Tobias, R.R.; Almero, V.J.; Puno, J.C.; Bandala, A.; Dadios, E.; Flores, R. Visual classification of lettuce growth stage based on morphological attributes using unsupervised machine learning models. In Proceedings of the IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON), Osaka, Japan, 16–19 November 2020; pp. 438–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Gowtham, R.; Jebakumar, R. Analysis and prediction of lettuce crop yield in aeroponic vertical farming using logistic regression method. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Data Communication Systems (ICSCDS), Erode, India, 23–25 March 2023; pp. 759–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Mamatha, V.; Kavitha, J.C. Machine learning based crop growth management in greenhouse environment using hydroponics farming techniques. Meas. Sens. 2023, 25, 100665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Obu, U.; Sarkarkar, G.; Ambekar, Y. Computer Vision for Monitor and Control of Vertical Farms Using Machine Learning Methods. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications (ICCICA), Nagpur, India, 26–27 November 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Jayasekara, C.; Banneka, S.; Pasindu, G.; Udawaththa, Y.; Wellalage, S.; Abeygunawardhane, P.K.W. Automated crop harvesting, growth monitoring and disease detection system for vertical farming greenhouse. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advancements in Computing (ICAC), Colombo, Sri Lanka, 9–11 December 2021; pp. 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Chang, S.; Lee, U.; Hong, M.J.; Jo, Y.D.; Kim, J.B. Time-series growth prediction model based on U-net and machine learning in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 721512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Wang, H.; Sánchez-Molina, J.A.; Li, M.; Berenguel, M.; Yang, X.T.; Bienvenido, J.F. Leaf area index estimation for a greenhouse transpiration model using external climate conditions based on genetics algorithms, back-propagation neural networks and nonlinear autoregressive exogenous models. Agric. Water Manag. 2017, 183, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Nagano, S.; Moriyuki, S.; Wakamori, K.; Mineno, H.; Fukuda, H. Leaf-movement-based growth prediction model using optical flow analysis and machine learning in plant factory. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Petropoulou, A.S.; van Marrewijk, B.; de Zwart, F.; Elings, A.; Bijlaard, M.; van Daalen, T.; Jansen, G.; Hemming, S. Lettuce production in intelligent greenhouses—3D imaging and computer vision for plant spacing decisions. Sensors 2023, 23, 2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Galaz, V.; Centeno, M.A.; Callahan, P.W.; Causevic, A.; Patterson, T.; Brass, I.; Baum, S.; Farber, D.; Fischer, J.; Garcia, D.; et al. Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability. Technol. Soc. 2021, 67, 101741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Vela, D.; Sharp, A.; Zhang, R.; Nguyen, T.; Hoang, A.; Pianykh, O.S. Temporal quality degradation in AI models. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 11654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Avgoustaki, D.D.; Xydis, G. Indoor vertical farming in the urban nexus context: Business growth and resource savings. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Mitchell, C.A. History of controlled environment horticulture: Indoor farming and its key technologies. HortScience 2022, 57, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Armanda, D.T.; Guinée, J.B.; Tukker, A. The second green revolution: Innovative urban agriculture’s contribution to food security and sustainability—A review. Glob. Food Sec. 2019, 22, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Hardy, K.; Orridge, T.; Heynes, X.; Gunasena, S.; Grundy, S.; Lu, C. Farming the future: Contemporary innovations enhancing sustainability in the agri-sector. Annu. Plant Rev. 2021, 4, 263–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Piechowiak, M. Countries Using Vertical Farming, Vertical Farming Planet. Available online: https://verticalfarmingplanet.com/countries-using-vertical-farming/#:~:text=There%20are%20currently%20over%20200,that%20focus%20on%20producing%20vegetables (accessed on 2 September 2023).
  178. Takeshima, H.; Joshi, P.K. Protected Agriculture, Precision Agriculture, and Vertical Farming: Brief Reviews of Issues in the Literature Focusing on the Developing Region in Asia. 2019. Available online: https://www.ifpri.org/publication/protected-agriculture-precision-agriculture-and-vertical-farming-brief-reviews-issues (accessed on 2 September 2023).
  179. Kalantari, F.; Tahir, O.M.; Joni, R.A.; Fatemi, E. Opportunities and challenges in sustainability of vertical farming: A review. J. Landsc. Ecol. 2018, 11, 35–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Takada, A. As High-Rise Farms Go Global, Japan’s Spread Leads the Way. Available online: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/11/01/business/tech/high-rise-farms-go-global-japans-spread-leads-way/ (accessed on 28 January 2023).
  181. Wen, X. Vertical Farming Reaches New Heights. 13 April 2023. Available online: https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202304/13/WS64373a55a31057c47ebb9cb0_3.html (accessed on 20 February 2023).
  182. Yan, X. Chinese Startup Gets in on Ground Floor of High-Rise Farms. 17 August 2020. Available online: https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Startups/Chinese-startup-gets-in-on-ground-floor-of-high-rise-farms (accessed on 20 February 2023).
  183. Ning, S.; Xydis, G. PEST analysis of the future Chinese vertical farming market: Environmental sustainability and energy savings. AIMS Agric. Food 2023, 8, 496–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Chatterjee, A.; Debnath, S.; Pal, H. Implication of urban agriculture and vertical farming for future sustainability. In Urban Horticulture; Solankey, S.S., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2020; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Kollenberg, K.A. Vertical Farming; Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World? 22 July 2011. Available online: https://cityfarmer.info/south-korean-city-of-suwon-has-a-vertical-farm/ (accessed on 22 December 2022).
  186. John. The Rise of Smart Vertical Farms in Korea—The Future of Farming. 25 May 2022. Available online: https://www.seoulz.com/the-rise-of-smart-vertical-farms-in-korea-the-future-of-farming/ (accessed on 5 January 2023).
  187. NextOn. Available online: http://nexton.ag/about/index.php (accessed on 10 February 2023).
  188. Farm8. Available online: http://en.farm8.co.kr/ (accessed on 10 February 2023).
  189. N.Thing. Available online: https://nthing.net/TECH (accessed on 10 February 2023).
  190. ALGA Farmtech. Available online: http://en.algafarmtech.com/index (accessed on 10 February 2023).
  191. Mordor Intelligence. Vertical Farming Market Size & Share Analysis-Growth Trends & Forecasts (2023–2028). Available online: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/vertical-farming-market (accessed on 2 April 2023).
  192. 80 Acres Farms. Available online: https://www.80acresfarms.com/ (accessed on 12 April 2023).
  193. Kozai, T.; Niu, G. Selected PFALs in the United States, the Netherlands, and China. In Plant Factory: An Indoor Vertical Farming System for Efficient Quality Food Production, 2nd ed.; Kozai, T., Niu, G., Takagaki, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 419–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. American Hydroponics. Available online: https://amhy-dro.com/ (accessed on 31 May 2023).
  195. Bright Farms. Available online: https://www.brightfarms.com/ (accessed on 31 May 2023).
  196. Hort Americas. Available online: https://hortameri-cas.com/ (accessed on 31 May 2023).
  197. The Plant. Available online: https://www.insidetheplant.com/ (accessed on 31 May 2023).
  198. FarmedHere. Available online: http://www.farmedhere.com/ (accessed on 31 May 2023).
  199. 80 Acres Farms Layoffs Linked to Industry & Other Collapses. Available online: : https://igrownews.com/80-acres-farms-layoffs-linked-to-industry-other-collapses/ (accessed on 31 May 2023).
  200. den Besten, J. Vertical farming development; the Dutch approach. In Plant Factory Using Artificial Light; Anpo, M., Fukuda, H., Wada, T., Eds.; Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Benis, K.; Ferrão, P. Commercial farming within the urban built environment–Taking stock of an evolving field in northern countries. Glob. Food Sec. 2018, 17, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. PlantLab. Available online: https://plantlab.com/ (accessed on 15 April 2023).
  203. UrbanFarmers. Available online: http://www.urbanfarmers.nl/ (accessed on 15 April 2023).
  204. B-Four Agro. Available online: https://b4agro.nl/ (accessed on 15 April 2023).
  205. Agricool. Available online: https://www.agritec-tu-re.com/agricool/ (accessed on 2 June 2023).
  206. Infarm. Available online: https://www.infarm.com/ (accessed on 2 June 2023).
  207. Farmers Cut. Available online: https://farmerscut.com/ (accessed on 2 June 2023).
  208. Architects, S. A New Model for Urban Farming for the World’s Largest Agricultural Producer and Consumer: China, Sunqiao Urban Agricultural District. Available online: https://www.sasaki.com/projects/sunqiao-urban-agricultural-district/ (accessed on 12 July 2023).
  209. La Tour Vivante—The Living Tower. SOA Architectes. Available online: https://archello.com/project/la-tour-vivante-the-living-tower (accessed on 10 June 2023).
  210. Jian Mu Tower. Farmscraper—Tall Building Design Meets Urban Farming. 2021. Available online: https://carloratti.com/project/jian-mu-tower/ (accessed on 9 May 2023).
  211. Jordana, S. Harvest Green Project/Romses Architects. ArchDaily. 7 May 2009. Available online: https://www.archdaily.com/21555/harvest-green-project-romses-architects (accessed on 18 June 2023).
  212. Romses Architects. Harvest Green Tower. Available online: http://www.romsesarchitects.com/harvest_green.html (accessed on 18 June 2023).
  213. Urban Skyfarm. Available online: http://www.aprilli.com/urban-skyfarm/ (accessed on 12 April 2023).
  214. Peters, A. This Tree-Shaped Farm-On-A-Skyscraper Could Bring Acres of Crops into the City. Available online: https://www.fastcompany.com/3032379/this-tree-shaped-farm-on-a-skyscraper-could-bring-acres-of-crops-into-the-city (accessed on 12 April 2023).
  215. Spread Co., Ltd. Largest FoodTech Deal in Japan: Vertical Farming Startup Spread Raises $30 Million to Accelerate Its Business. 2 August 2022. Available online: https://spread.co.jp/uploads/news-release_20220802-1.pdf (accessed on 22 May 2023).
  216. Hive-InnTM City Farm. New York, NY, USA. Available online: https://www.ovastudio.com/work/hive-inn-city-farm-nyc (accessed on 12 December 2022).
  217. Markham, D. Repurposed Shipping Containers May Be Building Blocks for Modular Vertical Urban Farms. Treehugger News. 11 October 2018. Available online: https://www.treehugger.com/shipping-container-repurposed-vertical-urban-farm-4855558 (accessed on 12 December 2022).
  218. Orsini, F.; Pennisi, G.; Zulfiqar, F.; Gianquinto, G. Sustainable use of resources in plant factories with artificial lighting (PFALs). Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 2020, 85, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Roberts, J.M.; Bruce, T.J.A.; Monaghan, J.M.; Pope, T.W.; Leather, S.R.; Beacham, A.M. Vertical farming systems bring new considerations for pest and disease management. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2020, 176, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Hegedűs, C.; Frankó, A.; Varga, P.; Gindl, S.; Tauber, M. Enabling Scalable Smart Vertical Farming with IoT and Machine Learning Technologies. In Proceedings of the NOMS 2023—2023 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium, Miami, FL, USA, 8–12 May 2023; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Mempel, H.; Jüttner, I.; Wittmann, S. The potentials of indoor farming for plant production. Automatisierungstechnik 2021, 69, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Zhu, X.-G.; Marcelis, L. Vertical farming for crop production. Mod. Agric. 2023, 1, 13–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Naqvi, S.M.Z.A.; Saleem, S.R.; Tahir, M.N.; Hussain, S.; Ul Haq, S.I.; Awais, M.; Qamar, S. Vertical Farming-Current Practices and Its Future. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 23, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Sarkar, A.; Majumder, M. Opportunities and challenges in sustainability of vertical eco-farming: A review. J. Adv. Agric. Technol. 2015, 2, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Abdullah, M.J.; Zhang, Z.; Matsubae, K. Potential for food self-sufficiency improvements through indoor and vertical farming in the gulf cooperation council: Challenges and opportunities from the case of Kuwait. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Csordás, A.; Füzesi, I. The impact of technophobia on vertical farms. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Siregar, R.R.A.; Seminar, K.B.; Wahjuni, S.; Santosa, E. Vertical farming perspectives in support of precision agriculture using artificial intelligence: A review. Computers 2022, 11, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Kim, H.-G.; Park, D.-H.; Chowdhury, O.R.; Shin, C.-S.; Cho, Y.-Y.; Park, J.-W. Location-based intelligent robot management service model using RGPSi with AoA for vertical farm. Lect. Notes Electr. Eng. 2014, 279, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Swain, M. Vertical farming trends and challenges: A new age of agriculture using IoT and machine learning. In Internet of Things for Agriculture 4.0: Impact and Challenges; Sing, R.S., Thakur, A.K., Gehlot, A., Kaviti, A.K., Eds.; Academic Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  230. Shrivastava, A.; Nayak, C.K.; Dilip, R.; Samal, S.R.; Rout, S.; Ashfaque, S.M. Automatic robotic system design and development for vertical hydroponic farming using IoT and big data analysis. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 80, 3546–3553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Larsen, D.H.; Woltering, E.J.; Nicole, C.C.S.; Marcelis, L.F.M. Response of basil growth and morphology to light intensity and spectrum in a vertical farm. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 597906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Lehnert, C.; McCool, C.; Sa, I.; Perez, T. Performance improvements of a sweet pepper harvesting robot in protected cropping environments. J. Field Robot. 2020, 37, 1197–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.