Next Article in Journal
How Water Quality and Quantity Affect Pepper Yield and Postharvest Quality
Previous Article in Journal
Estimation of Citrus Maturity with Fluorescence Spectroscopy Using Deep Learning
Previous Article in Special Issue
RNA Helicase Mediates Competitive Fitness of Listeria monocytogenes on the Surface of Cantaloupe
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Horticulturae 2019, 5(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5010003

Precision Crop Load Management of Apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) without Chemicals

Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 98, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
Received: 15 November 2018 / Revised: 20 December 2018 / Accepted: 21 December 2018 / Published: 28 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Safety Pertinent to Fresh Produce)
Full-Text   |   PDF [2431 KB, uploaded 28 December 2018]   |  

Abstract

Fruit thinning is an important management practice in commercial apple production. The standard industry practice for crop load management in many countries is based on bloom and/or post-bloom chemical thinning (CT) followed up with hand thinning. However, the response to CT is unpredictable and there is an increasing awareness of the environmental impact of many chemicals. Hence there is a need to find alternate environmentally acceptable methods for managing crop load. Artificial bud extinction (ABE), a thinning method that imitates natural bud extinction by manually removing buds before bud break, has been suggested as a potential tool to replace chemical thinning, but there have been no studies comparing ABE and chemical thinning. Trials were established in Tasmania, Australia to determine how ABE technology compares with best practice CT programs in terms of yield, fruit quality, and cost of implementation. Results from these trials demonstrated consistent fruit set of both Gala and Fuji apple under ABE management compared with conventional management. Fruit weight was increased in all ABE treatments from 5% up to 38%. The four studies presented here have demonstrated that ABE is a feasible alternative to chemical thinning, improving reliability of crop load management with increased predictability of fruit size and yield. Trees are significantly thinned before flowering, controlling biennial bearing. In addition, bud position is optimised, fruit is well spaced and light distribution into the canopy is enhanced. In terms of costs, implementation of ABE is comparable to managing crop load with CT programs but has the advantage that crop load management costs reduce in subsequent years after the initial tree set-up. ABE is also suitable for use in organic apple orchards. View Full-Text
Keywords: thinning; fruit quality; artificial bud extinction; yield; organic thinning; fruit quality; artificial bud extinction; yield; organic
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Bound, S.A. Precision Crop Load Management of Apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) without Chemicals. Horticulturae 2019, 5, 3.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Horticulturae EISSN 2311-7524 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top