Next Article in Journal
Monitoring β-Fructofuranosidase Activity through Kluyveromyces marxianus in Bioreactor Using a Lab-Made Sequential Analysis System
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhancing Pullulan Production in Aureobasidium pullulans through UV Mutagenesis Breeding and High-Throughput Screening System
Previous Article in Journal
Alternative Fermented Soy-Based Beverage: Impact of Inulin on the Growth of Probiotic Strains and Starter Culture
Previous Article in Special Issue
Formulation of a Gluten-Free Carob-Based Bakery Product: Evaluation of Glycemic Index, Antioxidant Activity, Rheological Properties, and Sensory Features
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Barley Vinegar Relieves Loperamide-Induced Constipation in Mice via the Modulation of the Gut Microbiota and Serum Metabolism

Fermentation 2023, 9(11), 962; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9110962
by Yan Li, Aixia Wang, Mengzi Nie, Zhiying Chen, Lili Wang, Liya Liu, Fengzhong Wang * and Litao Tong *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Fermentation 2023, 9(11), 962; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9110962
Submission received: 24 September 2023 / Revised: 5 November 2023 / Accepted: 7 November 2023 / Published: 9 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fermented Foods for Boosting Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript is interesting and has adequate information. However, statistical analysis is lacking. The authors must indicate which test for homogeneity of variances was performed. There are data that require non-parametric statistics such as gene analyses. The authors report correlations in the results, but do not cite the evidence in the methodology. It is necessary to separate the statistical analyzes by sections and include a statistical model

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors, 

thank you very much for this precious submission. I find this paper very interesting and also very detailed. Even if it is complex is very easy to understand and the scientific implications that can be glimpsed are of strong impact.

However I kindly ask to improve the figures;

 

Fig. 4 A/B 

Please try to improve the quality of these figures, I really love the impact of your results but it could be hard for the reader appreciate them. 

Fig. 9

Please improve the quality of the images, considering your efforts and the heavy statistic that you have performed we can present better your results. 

Discussion/Results

Are very complex and very detailed, I found the discussion very well composed. Maybe it is even too much detailed, especially the result section. 

First obstervation: The passage could benefit from a more concise and explicit conclusion that summarizes the key findings and their implications. What are the main takeaways from this research, and how might they be applied or further investigated?

Second observation: What could be the implications for human health? What parallels could be drawn between your work and a possible human treatment?

Third observation: What are the future prospects and next studies? 

Please write again the conclusion to answer to this questions in the best way, cause these results can advice different future prospectives. 

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop