Next Article in Journal
Biorefinery Approach for H2 and Acids Production Based on Uncontrolled pH Fermentation of an Industrial Effluent
Next Article in Special Issue
Terminal-Enhanced Polymerization in the Biosynthesis of Polysialic Acid
Previous Article in Journal
Dietary NDF/Starch Ratio Modulates Colonic Microbiota and Metabolites in Lambs before and after Weaning
Previous Article in Special Issue
Physicochemical Properties and Biological Characteristics of Sargassum fusiforme Polysaccharides Prepared through Fermentation of Lactobacillus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Kraft and Sulfite Pulps: What Is the Best Cellulosic Substrate for Industrial Saccharification?

by
Aleksandr R. Shevchenko
1,
Ksenia A. Mayorova
1,
Dmitry G. Chukhchin
1,
Alexey V. Malkov
1,
Evgeniy A. Toptunov
1,
Vadim D. Telitsin
1,2,
Aleksandra M. Rozhkova
3,
Ivan N. Zorov
2,3,
Maria A. Rodicheva
1,
Vadim A. Plakhin
1,
Denis A. Akishin
1,
Daria N. Poshina
4,
Margarita V. Semenova
3,
Andrey S. Aksenov
1,* and
Arkady P. Sinitsyn
2,3
1
Northern (Arctic) Federal University, Northern Dvina Embankment 17, 163000 Arkhangelsk, Russia
2
Chemical Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Vorobyevy Gory, 1–11, 119992 Moscow, Russia
3
Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology”, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky prospect, 33, build. 2, 119071 Moscow, Russia
4
Institute of Macromolecular Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences, Bolshoi VO 31, 199004 St. Petersburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2023, 9(11), 936; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9110936
Submission received: 18 September 2023 / Revised: 25 October 2023 / Accepted: 25 October 2023 / Published: 27 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polysaccharides Fermentation)

Abstract

:
Sulfite and kraft pulping are two principal methods of industrial delignification of wood. In recent decades, those have been considered as possibilities to pretreat recalcitrant wood lignocellulosics for the enzymatic hydrolysis of polysaccharides and the subsequent fermentation of obtained sugars to valuable bioproducts. Current work compares chemistry and technological features of two different cooking processes in the preparation of polysaccharide substrates for deep saccharification with P. verruculosum glycosyl hydrolases. Bleached kraft and sulfite pulps were subjected to hydrolysis with enzyme mixture of high xylanase, cellobiohydrolase, and β-glucosidase activities at a dosage of 10 FPU/g of dry pulp and fiber concentration of 2.5, 5, and 10%. HPLC was used to analyze soluble sugars after hydrolysis and additional acid inversion of oligomers to monosaccharides. Kraft pulp demonstrated higher pulp conversion after 48 h (74–99%), which mostly resulted from deep xylan hydrolysis. Sulfite-pulp hydrolysates, obtained in similar conditions due to higher hexose concentration (more than 50 g/L), had higher fermentability for industrial strains producing alcohols, microbial protein, or organic acids. Along with saccharification, enzymatic modification of non-hydrolyzed residues occurred, which led to decreased degree of polymerization and composition changes in two industrial pulps. As a result, crystallinity of kraft pulp increased by 1.3%, which opens possibilities for obtaining new types of cellulosic products in the pulp and paper industry. The high adaptability and controllability of enzymatic and fermentation processes creates prospects for the modernization of existing factories.

1. Introduction

Food security principles around the world imply an increasing use of abundant non-starch polysaccharide sources, including wood, to produce important industrial bio-based products. That requires developing new technologies, including primarily efficient enzymatic hydrolysis of polysaccharides [1,2]. Deep saccharification is one of the main tasks in this context; it remains challenging due to the recalcitrant structure of wood lignocellulose [3,4]. Prior to the implementation of cost-effective techniques for cellulose and hemicelluloses hydrolysis to fermentable sugars with advanced enzymes, an adequate pretreatment of raw substrate must be developed. A large number of researchers have proposed various pretreatment techniques based on physical [5,6], chemical [7], biological [8,9], and combined [10] treatment of wood lignocellulose. Nevertheless, the development of the most effective pretreatment method still remains urgent and continues to this day [11]. Finally, due to hierarchically ordered structure of cell wall and high lignin content in trees, pretreatment methods successfully applied in industry for non-wood lignocellulosics can hardly be adapted to pretreat raw wood for the production of sugars and subsequently bio-products with enzymes [12].
Novozhilov et al. first considered the industrial pulping of raw wood as a commercially available method for the effective pretreatment of wood polysaccharides to enzymatic hydrolysis [13,14]. The industrial wood-to-pulp processing provides leaching of most of lignin, partial destruction, and dissolution of hemicelluloses, as well as a reduction of cellulose degree of polymerization, increasing fiber swelling, etc. The widely applied sulfate or kraft pulping process implies reduced sulfur compounds and active alkali reagent and represents the dominant technology for production of paper-grade pulps from wood. It was shown that kraft pulping significantly increased the accessibility of hardwoods and softwoods polysaccharides for cellulases and hemicellulases [15,16,17]. Bleaching is one way of dealing with residual lignin as a negative factor for enzymatic saccharification. Bleached pulps have already been considered as an adequate substrate for enzymatic treatment [18]. Sulfite delignification was historically the first large-scale industrial pulping process [19]; it implies treatment with sulfur dioxide in acidic medium and at high temperatures for the production of commercial sulfite pulps of various applications. Enzymatic saccharification of sulfite pulps has been poorly studied so far; nevertheless, commercial cellulases have been applied in sulfite pulp production [20]. Various techniques have been proposed to modify sulfite pulping and produce sulfite pulps that are more suitable for enzymatic hydrolysis [21]. These include lignin conversion to lignosulfonates, as well as the application of the lignin reactive sites blocking agents to limit the enzyme adsorption onto lignin. An alternative approach is the enzymatic hydrolysis of industrially bleached pulps with minimal lignin content.
Successful pretreatment enables the complicated lignocellulose structure to be targeted by fungal glycosyl hydrolases (GHs). Generally GHs mixtures include endoglucanases, cellobiohydrolases, β-glucosidases, xylanases, and mannanases acting by endo- and exo-mechanisms, as well as accessory enzymes [22,23]. Acting together, these enzymes convert the main wood polysaccharides to fermentable sugars. However, simply maximizing the amount of carbohydrate active enzymes is not enough; the composition of the mixture and the ratio of individual enzymes are crucial for effective saccharification. The synergistic effect between cellulases and hemicellulases allows for a high saccharification level in cellulosic pulp with low enzyme dosages less than 10 filter paper units per 1 g of substrate. The generation of a cellulolytic complex with a balanced composition and high productivity is possible by means of genetic engineering. Currently, recombinant GHs produced by Penicillium fungi have received large-scale development and have demonstrated high efficiency in long-term studies [24,25] towards different cellulosic substrates [26], including good performance on kraft pulps [13,15,27]. In the 1990s, researchers of the Department of Chemical Enzymology of the Moscow State University started the development of laboratory-scale and industrial enzyme mixture derived from highly active P. verruculosum strains, which have already found applications as feed additives in animal breeding, increasing nutritional value [28,29]. The optimization of P. verruculosum enzyme compositions creates prospects for the successful saccharification of wood lignocellulose. The investigations of enzyme performance on less studied sulfite cellulosic pulp are now of great interest.
The enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates produces fermentable sugars, glucose, xylose, mannose, and others; most of those can be converted into bioethanol [30] or other highly valuable products, such as organic or amino acids [31,32]. Another type of product is non-hydrolyzed residue, insoluble biomodified cellulose, which represents a complex of partially hydrolyzed cellulose, xylan, and mannan. Due to the high hydrolysis level, its composition and properties differ essentially from the original, which could be favorable in terms of application [33,34]. Through comprehensive utilization of sugars, aromatic compounds, and insoluble products from lignocellulose, one can obtain the maximum benefit from non-food plant resources.
The current study presents a comparative analysis of enzymatic saccharification of two commercially available cellulosic pulps with P. verruculosum cellulases and xylanases—understudied sulfite pulp versus well-studied kraft pulp. The aim of the work was to validate existing industrial techniques for pulping and bleaching as effective pretreatment options of wood lignocelluloses and to select the optimal schemes for production of soluble fermentable sugars and valuable insoluble residues from wood polysaccharides.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cellulosic Pulps

We used never-dried bleached spruce sulfite pulp and never-dried bleached hardwood kraft pulp (birch and aspen mixture 1:1). Sulfite and kraft pulps were commercially available and were produced according to the schemes presented in Figure S1 and Figure S2, respectively. The bleaching scheme for kraft pulp is presented in Figure S3. Commercial sulfite pulp was bleached in six stages using chlorine- and alkali-based agents. To determine the composition of raw pulps, an exhaustive hydrolysis (enzyme dosage of 30 FPU/g) was carried out with P. verruculosum enzymes according to [13]. The polysaccharide compositions of initial pulps (Table 1) were further calculated from the monosaccharide content of hydrolysates.

2.2. Enzymes

The enzyme mixture was produced by ascomycete P. verruculosum Xyl35/Xyl8 [35]. The enzyme dosage used in hydrolysis experiments was calculated from the specific cellulase activity on filter paper and was adjusted to 10 filter paper units (FPU) per 1 g of dry pulp. Corresponding activities towards carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), beech xylan, galactomannan, p-NF-cellobioside (cellobiase activity), and p-NF-β-D-glucopyranoside (β-glucosidase activity) were determined and collected in Table 2. The activities were analyzed at a temperature of 50 °C and pH of 5.0, according to previously published techniques [36].

2.3. Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Pulp Substrates

Enzymatic saccharification at low pulp concentration (2.5 and 5% of dry fiber) was carried out using a ES-20/60 (BioSan, Latvia) laboratory shaker-incubator; for high pulp concentration (10%) a Biostat A Plus (Sartorius, Germany) bioreactor was used, all experiments were carried out in triplicates, and the results were presented as mean ± SD. The hydrolysis temperature was adjusted to 50 °C and pH was maintained at 5.0 with 0.05 M sodium acetate buffer. Continuous stirring at 150–300 rpm was applied during the entire saccharification period, up to 48 h. Samples for analyses were taken after 3, 6, 10, 12, and 24 h (for 2.5 and 5% concentration) and after 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 8, 12, 21, 24, and 48 h (for 10% concentration). The suspension was first centrifuged for 1 min at 13,400 rpm, and then the supernatant (hydrolysate) was further analyzed.

2.4. Hydrolysate Analyses

2.4.1. Determination of Reducing Sugars, Glucose, and Minor Soluble Sugars

An analysis of monosaccharides (glucose, xylose, and mannose), disaccharides (cellobiose, xylobiose) and oligosaccharides in hydrolysates was carried out by HPLC using an Agilent 1200 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) high pressure chromatographic system according to a procedure such as [37]. Sugars were separated on a Dionex CarboPac PA20 (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) column using NaOH gradient increasing from 7.5 to 100 mM and were analyzed using ESA Coulochem III (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) detector. The concentration of reducing sugars (RS, g/L) was determined by the modified Somogyi–Nelson method [38].
To assess the hydrolytic ability of the pulps, the oligosaccharides released under enzymatic action were further hydrolyzed using sulfuric acid. Hydrolysate aliquots were mixed with 8% sulfuric acid in a ratio of 1:1 and boiled for 20 min; after neutralization, the samples were analyzed similarly to the hydrolysates before acidic inversion.
The cellulose conversion in pulps was calculated as follows:
C e l l u l o s e   c o n v e r s i o n ,   % = G l c 0.2 M a n 0.9   S o l i d s %   c e l l u l o s e   100 %
Here Glc is the concentration of glucose after inversion (g/L); Solids is the pulp fiber concentration for hydrolysis (g/L); Man is the concentration of mannose after inversion (g/L); % cellulose is the cellulose content in pulp according to Table 1; 0.2 is the conversion factor, taking into account the glucose monosaccharide produced from glucomannan (as mannose to glucose ratio in glucomannan is 4:1 according to literature data [39]); and 0.9 is a factor considering the addition of water molecules during hydrolysis.

2.4.2. Gravimetrical Analysis of Non-Hydrolyzed Residue

Pulp mass losses under hydrolysis were used to calculate total pulp conversion. Non-hydrolyzed residue, or biomodified pulp, was washed several times with distilled water to remove soluble products, and then it was frozen at −80 °C and freeze-dried using a Labconco FreeZone 2.5 machine (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA). The pulp conversion was determined by the formula:
P u l p   c o n v e r s i o n ,   % = 1 n o n h y d r o l y s e d   r e s i d u e   d r y   w e i g h t   g i n i t i a l   f i b e r   d r y   w e i g h t   g 100 %

2.5. Pulp Fiber Characterisation prior and after Enzymatic Hydrolysis

To determine fiber dimensions, original never-dried pulps were suspended in water to a dry fiber concentration of 0.5% and analyzed using L&W Fiber Tester. Objects less than 0.1 mm wide and more than 0.2 mm long were counted as fibers [15].
The degree of polymerization (DP) of cellulose in initial pulps and lyophilized biomodified residue was calculated from intrinsic viscosities of 0.1% cellulose solutions in cadmium ethylenediamine according to Shevchenko et al. [27]. Pulp crystallinity was determined according to the previously published method [40] using a XRD-7000S (Shimadzu, Japan) powder X-ray diffractometer. The X-ray diffractograms of pressed pellets were recorded using a non-reflective silicon sample holder and X-ray tube with Cu target that operated at 50 kV and 30 mA.

3. Results

3.1. Enzymatic Hydrolysis at Low Pulp Concentrations

We compared cellulose conversion in sulfite and kraft pulp, taking into account differences in their polysaccharide composition. The saccharification was performed at fiber concentrations of 2.5 and 5.0% (w/w, dry weight) with 10 FPU/g of P. verruculosum enzymes for 24 h. The concentration of 2.5% was chosen to ensure complete hydrolysis. The concentration of 5% was chosen to increase sugar concentrations in hydrolysates while hydrolysis levels were still high. Kraft pulp showed a high level of cellulose conversion up to 93% (Figure 1). Sulfite pulp demonstrated a lower level of cellulose conversion; however, 50% of the theoretical glucose yield was reached in 12 h (Figure 1, concentration 2.5%). Increasing the substrate concentration from 2.5 to 5% reduced cellulose conversion for both pulps, with the largest decrease of 33% for kraft pulp, which is related to a decrease in stirring efficiency and the presence of residual lignin causing enzyme inhibition [41]. The total amount of reducing sugars over 48 h was at the level of 27.2–51.9 g/L for both pulps (Table S1). The maximal pulp conversion was achieved at the lowest substrate concentration (2.5%), 99% and 94% for kraft and sulfite pulp, respectively (Table S1). Thus, at low substrate concentration, both pulps demonstrated high hydrolyzability since they were almost completely hydrolyzed by the P. verruculosum enzyme complex.

3.2. Enzymatic Hydrolysis at High Pulp Concentrations

Enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics at high substrate concentration of 10% will provide higher concentrations of sugars in resulting hydrolysates, which is crucial for subsequent biosynthesis of organic acids and amino acids. However, higher pulp concentrations require more intensive stirring. In that case, several GHs can be inhibited by corresponding end products. We also observed a significant decrease in the hydrolysis efficiency, by 10–30%, with an increase of the pulp concentration from 5 to 10%. Hydrolysates of kraft and sulfite pulp differ in the composition and content of soluble sugars. As shown in Figure 2, glucose, being a cellulose monomer, dominated in hydrolysates over the course of hydrolysis. The final glucose concentration after 48 h reached 50 g/L for sulfite pulp, while 4% less glucose concentration was obtained from the kraft sample under the same condition. The hydrolysates differed most significantly in content of xylose, a xylan monomer. After 48 h, the ratio of xylose to glucose was 0.35 for kraft pulp and only 0.06 for sulfite pulp. In addition, the concentration of reducing sugars was also different for two types of hydrolysates, reflecting the mannan content in two pulps. For kraft pulp, the concentration of reducing sugars was 71.1 g/L at a total pulp conversion of 74% (Table S1). The final conversion of sulfite pulp was lower at 70%; however, sulfite pulp produced glucose-rich hydrolysates, and minor sugars represented less than 18% of hydrolysate monosaccharides.

3.3. Transformation of Non-Hydrolysed Residue

As hydrolysis proceeded deeper with the accumulation of large amounts of soluble sugars, significant changes occurred in the composition and properties of insoluble residue. Such biomodified pulps consist of low DP cellulose, remaining hemicelluloses, and non-carbohydrate compounds [27]. As shown in Figure 3, the initial DP of cellulose in pulps after sulfite delignification was higher compared to kraft pulp—1025 ± 122 versus 950 ± 92, respectively. After hydrolysis with P. verruculosum enzymes, the average length of cellulose chain significantly decreased in 24 h and further; however, this modification proceeded differently for two pulps. While the DP for sulfite pulp decreased almost twice in 48 h (DP 550), at the same time for kraft pulp at a conversion level of 74% the DP reduced more drastically and reached the level of commercial microcrystalline cellulose (DP 290).
Crystallinity is another important parameter that is crucial for possible further applications of biomodified pulps. As shown in Figure 4, the initial values of the crystallinity for two pulps were quite similar and equaled 46–47%. At the initial stages of hydrolysis, up to 24 h, crystallinity of commercial pulps generally increases due to the action of enzymes, especially hemicellulases and endo-β-1,4-glucanases, which predominantly digest amorphous cellulose [27]. We also observed an increase in crystallinity of 1.3–2.2% in both pulps after 24 h of hydrolysis. The resulting crystallinity was slightly higher than the previously obtained values for commercial microcrystalline cellulose (47.2%) [27,33]. The final hydrolysis stages (48 h) contributed to a decrease in the crystalline areas, with more significant changes for sulfite pulp (Figure 4). The crystallinity of kraft pulp after prolonged hydrolysis remained at a high level, higher than that of initial kraft pulp and commercial microcrystalline cellulose.

4. Discussion

4.1. Feasibility of Industrial Pulping for Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Wood Polysaccharides

Wood lignocellulosics contain a significant amount of lignin, an aromatic heteropolymer, that binds polysaccharides into a complex matrix and in the meantime hinders the cellulase attack on the cellulose. The enzyme inactivation occurs during the non-productive binding of cellulases on lignin due to electrostatic or hydrophobic interactions [15,41,42]. Enzyme inhibition with an excessive amount of acetyl groups or some extractives can also contribute to a decrease in the hydrolysis efficiency [43]. Thus, for successful enzymatic saccharification of wood lignocellulosics, it is necessary to minimize the factors during the pretreatment stage. On a laboratory scale several methods are used to delignify wood, such as steam explosion [44], treatment with mineral acids [45] or organic acids [46], sodium hydroxide [46,47], and organosolv pulping [48]. Despite the high efficiency of these methods, technological and economic difficulties arise when scaling them up. An industrially available alternative is the thermochemical processing of wood chips aimed at obtaining fibrous wood pulps for the manufacturing of paper, cardboard, and other paper products. Enzymes that have already found an application in the pulp and paper industry include endoglucanases for pulp viscosity control and xylanases for kraft pulp prebleaching [20]. This creates a background for a deeper introduction of enzymatic steps into the production process.
Commercial pulps contain more than 92% of polysaccharides, consisting of cellulose as the major component and hemicelluloses (up to 30%) that were partially destructed during cooking. Compared to original wood, commercial pulps have lower lignin content, improved accessibility to cellulases and hemicellulases, and a lower content of fermentation inhibitors after hydrolysis. The toxic inhibitors are mostly products of monosaccharide thermal degradation, furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, phenolic compounds derived from lignin, and organic acids, which can cause significant inhibition of industrial microbial strains [49]. Since these compounds are concentrated mainly in spent cooking liquors, the hot washing of commercial pulps removes most of the inhibitors from the fibers. Furthermore, alkaline treatment stages using sodium, calcium, or ammonium hydroxide, at a pH higher than 10, significantly enhances the detoxification of cellulosic pulps [50].
Historically, sulfite pulping was developed earlier than other methods of industrial delignification [51]. The most common process is acid sulfite cooking (Figure S1), which applies acidic cooking liquor produced by burning sulfur or pyrites. Under the action of sulfur dioxide in the cooking liquor, lignin is transferred into a solution in the form of lignosulfonates [52]. High temperatures and the action of sulfurous acid and its salts lead to an efficient extraction of lignin, partial destruction of hemicelluloses and, to a lesser extent, cellulose. As a result, cellulose-rich pulps are produced which contain less than 20% mannan and xylan in total (Table 1). Sulfite spent liquor, a by-product of sulfite pulping, contains a mixture of oligo-, di-, and monosaccharides with a total content of 26–30% of the dry weight, as well as lignin derivatives and sugar decomposition products [53]. Further treatment of spent liquor at sulfite plants includes neutralization, evaporation, and other chemical and thermomechanical treatment, leading to liquor detoxification. For more than 85 years, spent liquor sugars have been utilized by yeast fermentation to obtain feed protein or ethanol [54]. Among industrial strains, yeasts are the most resistant to the highly inhibitory liquor-based media, but poor substrate quality results in low fermentation productivity and low overall technology efficiency.
To date, kraft pulping is one widespread and straightforward way to obtain cellulosic pulps. It involves treatment with a sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfide (Figure S2) and ensures the extraction of most of the lignin, acetyl groups, uronic acids, and partially hemicelluloses [55,56]. The disruption of lignin–carbohydrate linkages during kraft pulping results in the subsequent liberation of fibers with an increase in their inner surface area. This and subsequent bleaching (Figure S3) positively affect the pulp papermaking properties, and also determines the high accessibility of kraft pulps to enzymatic hydrolysis, according to present and previous studies [15]. A well-designed recovery system for cooking chemicals and heat eliminates lignin utilization issues. Spent black liquor contains 30–35% lignin and 30–35% sugar decomposition products; its combustion provides energy to heat the digester. The green liquor produced after combustion is subjected to causticization to obtain white liquor, an active reagent for the cooking of a new batch of wood chips (Figure S2).
Both sulfite and kraft pulping produce fibrous paper-grade pulps, however, the resulting pulps differ significantly in fiber properties and composition, which directly depends on the cooking process, cooking reagents, and on the species of wood [13]. During sulfite pulping, polysaccharides, mainly hemicelluloses, are partially degraded and released into the solution in the form of dextrins, oligo-, and, to a lesser extent, monosaccharides [57]. The acidic environment causes deacetylation of hemicelluloses; deacetylation and cleavage of galactopyranose units in softwood glucomannans lead to their consolidation, which, together with the high resistance of cellulose to cooking acid, contributes to an increased yield of sulfite process comparing to kraft pulping. For these reasons softwoods, containing mainly cellulose and mannans, are used to obtain high pulp yields. Alkaline delignification is characterized by a higher loss of cellulose, which is less resistant to alkaline peeling compared to hemicelluloses. Hardwoods are considered the most suitable for kraft pulping, mainly due to the unique behavior of xylans during cooking. In an alkaline medium, most of the xylans dissolve, however, after the cleavage of glucuronic acid units, xylan quickly stabilizes on cellulose fibers, which increases both the mechanical strength and the yield of the kraft fibers. Such modified xylan becomes more accessible for hemicellulases; we observed its deep hydrolysis under the action of the P. verruculosum xylanases. Since xylan destruction made pulp fibers more accessible to cellulases, the close to complete saccharification of hardwood kraft pulp became possible due to the synergistic action of cellulases and hemicellulases in the enzyme mixture. As a result, we obtained a hydrolysate with a predominantly higher content of monosaccharides (glucose and xylose) compared to oligosaccharides.

4.2. Characterization of Hydrolysis Products of Commercial Pulps and Their Potential Application

Most of the publications on enzymatic saccharification of raw wood give general time-yield dependences for glucose and reducing sugars [58,59]. Only a few studies have analyzed the monosaccharide composition of hydrolysates [42,46,60], while concentrations of cellobiose, xylobiose, and oligosaccharides are rarely reported [16,17,46]. Finally, data on the content of oligosaccharides with DP ≥ 5 are practically not found in the literature. However, these data are important characteristic of hydrolysates and their potential in subsequent fermentation using selected bacteria or yeasts. The identification of various oligomers by chromatography is tricky, since their concentrations in hydrolysates against major components are close to the detection limit. Here we propose determination based on the amount of monomers formed from oligomers after acid inversion (Section 2.3). The increase in concentration of the main sugars (glucose, xylose, and mannose) after acid inversion allows for calculating the oligomer content in hydrolysates and their proportion in the total amount of soluble sugars. This approach reveals composition differences in hydrolysates of pulps with similar hydrolyzability.
During hydrolysis by P. verruculosum enzymes, kraft pulp hydrolysates accumulated glucose and xylose as major products, while glucose predominated in sulfite pulp hydrolysates (Figure 2). Cellobiose was found to be the second main product of cellulose hydrolysis after glucose (Table 3); an increase in the concentration of xylose and mannose after acid inversion of hydrolysates indicated the presence of soluble oligomeric xylans and mannans. After 48 h of conversion of kraft pulp, the accumulation (up to 4.5 g/L) of xylobiose and xylooligomers with a higher DP was observed, mostly from reprecipitated xylan, highly accessible for P. verruculosum endoxylanases. A significant amount of xylooligomers can inhibit β-glucosidase [61], which might explain the observed high cellobiose content in kraft pulp hydrolyzates. The level of pentose oligomers, and especially xylose and xylobiose, must be considered when selecting a fermentation strain for further microbiological conversion. The most complete fermentation of kraft pulp sugar hydrolysates can only be carried out with strains assimilating xylose along with glucose, for example Bacillus vallismortis [62], Candida guilliermondii FTI 20037 [63], and B. coagulans Azu-10 [64]. In addition, to increase the yield of target fermentation products, research is being carried out on the genetic design of Saccharomyces cerevisiae [65,66], Gluconobacter oxydans [67], and Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB [68].
In the production of easily assimilated hexose sugars, sulfite pulp is more promising over kraft pulp due to the initial softwood composition and cooking method. Sulfite pulp hydrolysates accumulated a significant amount of mannan hydrolysis products, mainly di- and oligomers, since after acid inversion the concentration of mannose increased by 1.7 times. The fermentability of hydrolysates can be improved by increasing the activity of β-mannosidase in the enzyme cocktail; the total amount of easily assimilated hexoses can reach over 93% of the reducing sugars. The high hexose ratio in hydrolysates of wood polysaccharides facilitates microbiological conversion, since most industrial strains preferentially consume hexoses. Yeast strains used in spent sulfite liquor fermentation are known to metabolize in toxic liquor media, assimilating little sugars produced through acid hydrolysis during sulfite cooking [53,66]. For the complete fermentation of media based on enzymatic hydrolysates of sulfite pulp, it is important to use industrial strains capable of utilizing mannose, for example, Candida yeasts or genetically modified Corynebacterium glutamicum [69] and Rhodosporidium toruloides-1588 [70].
A large amount (average 10 g/L) of soluble poorly assimilated oligosaccharides in the hydrolyzates of kraft and sulfite pulp provokes the search for their alternative applications. One possible alternative is prebiotics based on cellooligosaccharides (COS), xylooligosaccharides (XOS), and mannooligosaccharides (MOS). These generally indigestible compounds can represent a special type of prebiotics, providing a carbon and energy source for gut microbiota [70,71].
When choosing the best pulp substrate, we should also consider the amount and properties of non-soluble product along with fermentable sugars. Generally, in industrial trials, the insoluble fraction remains significant, which is related to reasonable enzyme dosages and hydrolysis time. Compared to initial polysaccharide composition (Table 1), pulps underwent significant changes after 24 and 48 h of hydrolysis with P. verruculosum enzymes (Figure 5). Cellulose remained the main component of unhydrolysed residue; for kraft pulp its content increases to 76%, while for sulfite pulp, after an increase up to 80% (24 h), it then decreased by 1% (48 h). In kraft pulp the hydrolysis rate of xylan, considering its accessibility on the surface of the fibers, can exceed the hydrolysis rate of cellulose. In sulfite pulp xylan content is lower, and its localization significantly decreases its accessibility to xylanases. Furthermore, the content of non-polysaccharide components increased in the sulfite pulp. These two effects contributed to the decrease in the crystallinity of sulfite pulp at the final stages of enzymatic hydrolysis (Figure 4). For kraft pulp, due to intensive hemicelluloses hydrolysis, an enzymatic purification of cellulose took place, increasing both the content of cellulose and its crystallinity.

4.3. Complex Processing of Industrial Pulps Including Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Microbial Fermentation

As discussed earlier, spent sulfite liquors undergo biotechnological conversion to obtain bioethanol and single cell protein. The low efficiency of fermentation with yeasts can be increased by increasing the quality of the liquor-based media. Hydrolysates of sulfite pulps obtained with P. verruculosum enzymes are glucose-rich solutions with a sugar concentration 3–5 times higher than in the spent liquor. The content of hexoses in hydrolysates can be further increased by increasing the mannanase activity of the enzyme cocktail. Combining even a small amount of hydrolysate with the main stream of spent sulfite liquor will significantly increase the total hexose content and favorably affect the production of microbial protein or ethanol by yeasts, or various valuable products, if non-yeast strains are used. The unhydrolyzed residue from sulfite pulp contains a mixture of polysaccharides, with cellulose being the major component and hemicelluloses providing good papermaking properties. The addition of this biomodified pulp to the main pulp flow can increase the strength of the resulting paper, ensuring integrated processing of all saccharification products (Figure 6). Thus, this technological solution can preserve a few remained sulfite pulp productions through the introduction of enzymatic hydrolysis and the modernization of the already-applied fermentation processes.
Kraft pulp production has historically lacked fermentation technology. The present work proposes the ways for their implementation, simultaneously increasing the number of products one can obtain from well-studied and widely used commercial kraft pulp. For the enzymatic saccharification of kraft pulp, P. verruculosum GHs complexes with sufficiently high xylanase activity can be used without modifications. The resulting solutions containing mostly glucose and xylose should be fermented by industrial strains capable of efficient assimilation of xylose along with glucose. It will allow the most complete conversion of simple sugars into bioproducts for the pharmaceutical, food, or energy industry, such as organic acids, amino acids, and alcohols (including biofuels) (Figure 7). Unfermented XOS and MOS, when skillfully separated from the culture medium after fermentation, can be used as prebiotics in nutrition, and this topic currently evokes increased interest [72]. Biomodified kraft pulp, an insoluble residue after enzymatic saccharification, has DP and crystallinity close to commercial MCC, obtained by acid hydrolysis of plant cellulose. Further development of enzymatic modification and unhydrolyzed pulp properties will create a background for its applications similar to MCC, including adsorbents, drug carriers, and formulation fillers [73], as well as hydrogel matrix for tissue engineering purposes [27,74].

5. Conclusions

When choosing the best cellulosic substrate for industrial saccharification, it is necessary to consider the specific needs of particular pulp manufacture. For the generation of highly concentrated glucose-rich fermentation media, it is better to use kraft pulp. Advanced and cost-effective kraft pulping allows for heat and reagent recovery, as well as the production of cellulosic pulp suitable for additional applications, in contrast to the direct production of cardboard and paper. A part of the mill’s pulp flow can be directed to enzymatic saccharification to produce new products, such as biomodified pulp, which increases biorefining efficiency. While kraft pulp hydrolysis allows for the production of highly concentrated media, the media based on sulfite pulp hydrolysates have enhanced fermentability.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fermentation9110936/s1, Table S1: Reducing sugar yield and pulp conversion after 48 h of hydrolysis at fiber concentrations of 2.5, 5 and 10%; Figure S1: Scheme of sulfite-pulping process; Figure S2: Scheme of kraft-pulping process; Figure S3: Scheme of pulp bleaching process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.R.S., A.P.S. and A.S.A.; methodology, A.R.S., A.M.R., D.G.C., V.A.P., K.A.M. and A.S.A.; resources, D.A.A. and V.D.T.; data curation, A.R.S., I.N.Z., A.V.M. and E.A.T.; writing—original draft preparation, K.A.M., A.S.A. and A.R.S.; writing—review and editing, D.N.P., M.V.S. and A.P.S.; visualization, D.A.A. and A.S.A.; enzymatic hydrolysis of pulps, A.R.S., K.A.M., M.A.R. and A.S.A.; project administration, A.S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Russian Science Foundation supported all biocatalysis studies, hydrolysate and biomodified pulp analysis (project 22-24-20136).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

In this work, we used instrumentation of the Core Facility Center “Arktika” of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov and the Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, M.; Li, J.; Wang, S.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, C.; Chunhui, Z.; Han, S. Status and trends of enzyme cocktails for efficient and ecological production in the pulp and paper industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 418, 138196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chatterjee, A.; Puri, S.; Sharma, P.K.; Deepa, P.R.; Chowdhury, S. Nature-inspired Enzyme engineering and sustainable catalysis: Biochemical clues from the world of plants and extremophiles. Front. Bioeng. Biotech 2023, 11, 1229300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Álvarez, C.; Reyes-Sosa, F.M.; Díez, B. Enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass from wood. Microb. Biotech. 2016, 9, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zoghlami, A.; Paës, G. Lignocellulosic biomass: Understanding recalcitrance and predicting hydrolysis. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, W.C.; Han, L.J.; Peng, T.B.; Xie, Y.Y.; Zou, Y.; Li, L.Z.; Jia, S.R.; Zhong, C. Structural and behavior changes of herbaceous and hardwood biomass during steam explosion pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. BioResources 2020, 15, 691–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mikulski, D.; Kłosowski, G. High-pressure microwave-assisted pretreatment of softwood, hardwood and non-wood biomass using different solvents in the production of cellulosic ethanol. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2023, 16, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lehto, J.T.; Alén, R.J. Chemical pretreatments of wood chips prior to alkaline pulping—A review of pretreatment alternatives, chemical aspects of the resulting liquors, and pulping outcomes. BioResources 2015, 10, 8604–8656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Civzele, A.; Stipniece-Jekimova, A.A.; Mezule, L. Fungal ligninolytic enzymes and their application in biomass lignin pretreatment. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, H.; Yang, S.; Sun, X.Y.; Yuan, T.Q. Biological treatment of poplar wood with white-rot fungus Trametes hirsuta C7784: Structural elucidation of the whole lignin in treated wood. BioResources 2016, 11, 7305–7321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, S.M.; Dien, B.S.; Singh, V. Erratum to: Promise of combined hydrothermal/chemical and mechanical refining for pretreatment of woody and herbaceous biomass. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2016, 9, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. El Hage, M.; Louka, N.; Rezzoug, S.-A.; Maugard, T.; Sablé, S.; Koubaa, M.; Debs, E.; Maache-Rezzoug, Z. Bioethanol production from woody biomass: Recent advances on the effect of pretreatments on the bioconversion process and energy yield aspects. Energies 2023, 16, 5052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Valamonfared, J.; Javanmard, A.S.; Ghaedi, M.; Bagherinasab, M. Bioethanol production using lignocellulosic materials and thermophilic microbial hydrolysis. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2023, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Novozhilov, E.V.; Sinelnikov, I.G.; Aksenov, A.S.; Chukchin, D.G.; Tyshkunova, I.V.; Rozhkova, A.M.; Osipov, D.O.; Zorov, I.N.; Sinitsyn, A.P. Biocatalytic conversion of kraft pulp using cellulase complex of Penicillium verruculosum. Catal. Ind. 2016, 8, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Novozhilov, E.V.; Aksenov, A.S.; Demidov, M.L.; Chukhchin, D.G.; Dotsenko, G.S.; Osipov, D.O.; Sinitsyn, A.P. Application of complex biocatalysts based on recombinant Penicillium verruculosum enzyme preparations in the hydrolysis of semichemical hardwood pulp. Catal. Ind. 2014, 6, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aksenov, A.S.; Tyshkunova, I.V.; Poshina, D.N.; Guryanova, A.A.; Chukhchin, D.G.; Sinelnikov, I.G.; Terentyev, K.Y.; Skorik, Y.A.; Novozhilov, E.V.; Synitsyn, A.P. Biocatalysis of industrial kraft pulps: Similarities and differences between hardwood and softwood pulps in hydrolysis by enzyme complex of Penicillium verruculosum. Catalysts 2020, 10, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Buzała, K.; Przybysz, P.; Rosicka-Kaczmarek, J.; Kalinowska, H. Production of glucose-rich enzymatic hydrolysates from cellulosic pulps. Cellulose 2015, 22, 663–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Przybysz Buzała, K.; Kalinowska, H.; Przybysz, P.; Malachowska, E. Conversion of various types of lignocellulosic biomass to fermentable sugars using kraft pulping and enzymatic hydrolysis. Wood Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 873–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kafle, K.; Shin, H.; Lee, C.M.; Park, S.; Kim, S.H. Progressive structural changes of Avicel, bleached softwood and bacterial cellulose during enzymatic hydrolysis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Annergren, G.; Germgard, U. Process aspects for sulfite pulping. Appita Technol. Innov. Manufact. Environ. 2014, 67, 270–276. [Google Scholar]
  20. Poshina, D.; Novozhilov, E. Modification of spruce sulphite pulp by cellulase treatment. Cellul. Chem. Technol 2015, 49, 187–194. [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang, C.; Li, R.; Tang, W.; Zheng, Y.; Meng, X. Improve Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass by Modifying Lignin Structure via Sulfite Pretreatment and Using Lignin Blockers. Fermentation 2022, 8, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rozhkova, A.M.; Gusakov, A.V.; Dotsenko, A.S.; Sinitsyna, O.A.; Sinitsyn, A.P. Capabilities of the ascomycete fungus Penicillium verruculosum and its enzymes for conversion of cellulosic feedstock. In Liquid Biofuels: Bioethanol; Soccol, C.R., Pereira, G.A.G., Luciana, C.-G.D., Vandenberghe, P.S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 12, pp. 243–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ogunyewo, O.A.; Upadhyay, P.; Rajacharya, G.H.; Okereke, O.E.; Faas, L.; Gómez, L.D.; McQueen-Mason, S.J.; Yazdani, S.S. Accessory enzymes of hypercellulolytic Penicillium funiculosum facilitate complete saccharification of sugarcane bagasse. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2021, 14, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gusakov, A.V. Alternatives to Trichoderma reesei in biofuel production. Trends Biotech. 2011, 29, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Korotkova, O.G.; Rozhkova, A.M.; Rubtsova, E.A.; Sinitsyn, A.P. Cellulases from mycelial fungi Penicillium verruculosum as a real alternative to Trichoderma enzymes in industrial hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass. In From Biomass to Biobased Products; Jacob-Lopes, E., Queiroz Zepka, L., Rodrigues Dias, R., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2023; p. 19. Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/87268 (accessed on 3 June 2023).
  26. Osipov, D.O.; Dotsenko, G.S.; Sinitsyna, O.A.; Kondratieva, E.G.; Zorov, I.N.; Shashkov, I.A.; Satrutdinov, A.D.; Sinitsyn, A.P. Comparative study of the convertibility of agricultural residues and other cellulose-containing materials in hydrolysis with Penicillium verruculosum cellulase complex. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shevchenko, A.R.; Tyshkunova, I.V.; Chukhchin, D.G.; Malkov, A.V.; Toptunov, E.A.; Telitsin, V.D.; Rozhkova, A.M.; Sinitsyna, O.A.; Gofman, I.V.; Aksenov, A.S. Production of biomodified bleached kraft pulp by catalytic conversion using Penicillium verruculosum enzymes: Composition, properties, structure and application. Catalysts 2023, 13, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Korotkova, O.G.; Rozhkova, A.M.; Kislitsin, V.Y.; Sinitsyna, O.A.; Denisenko, Y.A.; Marorochkina, M.A.; Zorov, I.N.; Shashkov, I.A.; Satrudinov, A.D.; Sinytsyn, A.P. New feed enzyme preparations for the destruction of nonstarch polysaccharides and phytates. Moscow Univ. Chem. Bull. 2023, 78, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sinitsyn, A.P.; Sinitsyna, O.A.; Zorov, I.N.; Rozhkova, A.M. Carbohydrases: 50 years of research at the department of chemical enzymology of Moscow state university—History and prospects. Moscow Univ. Chem. Bull. 2023, 78, 170–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Branco, R.H.R.; Amândio, M.S.T.; Serafim, L.S.; Xavier, A.M.R.B. Ethanol production from hydrolyzed kraft pulp by mono- and co-cultures of yeasts: The challenge of C6 and C5 sugars consumption. Energies 2020, 13, 744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kerssemakers, A.A.J.; Doménech, P.; Cassano, M.; Yamakawa, C.K.; Dragone, G.; Mussatto, S.I. Production of itaconic acid from cellulose pulp: Feedstock feasibility and process strategies for an efficient microbial performance. Energies 2020, 13, 1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Júnior, A.I.M.; Soccol, C.R.; Camara, M.C.; Aulestia, D.T.M.; de Souza Vandenberghe, L.P.; de Carvalho, J.C. Challenges in the production of second-generation organic acids (potential monomers for application in biopolymers). Biomass Bioenergy 2021, 149, 106092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shevchenko, A.; Aksenov, A.; Tyshkunova, I.; Falev, D.; Toptunov, E. Products of hydrolysis of bleached hardwood kraft pulp by carbohydrate-active enzymes. In The International Conference on Advances in Emerging Trends and Technologies; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, T.; Li, X.; Xu, N.; Guo, Y.; Liu, G.; Zhao, J. Preparation of cellulose nanocrystals from commercial dissolving pulp using an engineered cellulose system. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2023, 10, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sinitsyn, A.P.; Korotkova, O.G.; Rubtsova, E.A.; Sinitsyna, O.A.; Kondrat’eva, E.G.; Sereda, A.S.; Zorov, I.N.; Rozhkova, A.M. Construction of recombinant producers of enzyme preparations for feed production with an expression system based on Penicillium verruculosum fungus. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2020, 56, 875–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ghose, T.K. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl. Chem. 1987, 59, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Willför, S.; Pranovich, A.; Tamminen, T.; Puls, J.; Laine, C.; Suurnäkki, A.; Saake, B.; Uotila, K.; Simolin, H.; Hemming, J.; et al. Carbohydrate analysis of plant materials with uronic acid-containing polysaccharides—A comparison between different hydrolysis and subsequent chromatographic analytical techniques. Ind. Crops Prod. 2009, 29, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nelson, N. A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose. J. Biol. Chem. 1944, 153, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Laine, J.; Buchert, J.; Viikari, L.; Stenius, P. Characterization of unbleached kraft pulps by enzymatic treatment, potentiometric titration and polyelectrolyte adsorption. Holzforschung 1996, 50, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vydrina, I.; Malkov, A.; Vashukova, K.; Tyshkunova, I.; Mayer, L.; Faleva, A.; Shestakov, S.; Novozhilov, E.; Chukhchin, D. A new method for determination of lignocellulose crystallinity from XRD data using NMR calibration. Carb. Pol. Technol. Appl. 2023, 5, 100305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, C.; Jiang, X.; Shen, X.; Hu, J.; Tang, W.; Wu, X.; Ragauskas, A.; Jameel, H.; Meng, X.; Yong, Q. Lignin-enzyme interaction: A roadblock for efficient enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 154, 111822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rahikainen, J.; Mikander, S.; Marjamaa, K.; Tamminen, T.; Lappas, A.; Viikari, L.; Kruus, K. Inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by residual lignins from softwood—Study of enzyme binding and inactivation on lignin-rich surface. Biotech. Bioeng. 2011, 108, 2823–2834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pan, X.; Gilkes, N.; Saddler, J.N. Effect of acetyl groups on enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates. Holzforschung 2006, 60, 398–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pažitný, A.; Russ, A.; Boháček, Š.; Stankovská, M.; Ihnát, V. Effect of steam explosion on enzymatic hydrolysis of various parts of poplar tree. Wood Res. 2020, 65, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mirmohamadsadeghi, S.; Karimi, K.; Horváth, I.S. Improvement of solid-state biogas production from wood by concentrated phosphoric acid pretreatment. BioResources 2016, 11, 3230–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wen, P.; Chen, Z.; Lian, Z.; Zhang, J. Efficient production of high concentration monosaccharides and ethanol from poplar wood after delignification and deacetylation. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 385, 129459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Doménech, P.; Manzanares, P.; Álvarez, C.; Ballesteros, M.; Duque, A. Comprehensive study on the effects of process parameters of alkaline thermal pretreatment followed by thermomechanical extrusion in sugar liberation from Eucalyptus grandis wood. Holzforschung 2021, 75, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chu, Q.; Tong, W.; Chen, J.; Wu, S.; Jin, Y.; Hu, J.; Song, K. Organosolv pretreatment assisted by carbocation scavenger to mitigate surface barrier effect of lignin for improving biomass saccharification and utilization. Biotech. Biofuels 2021, 14, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chandel, A.K.; Da Silva, S.S.; Singh, O.V. Detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates: Biochemical and metabolic engineering toward white biotechnology. BioEnergy Res. 2013, 6, 388–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Alriksson, B.; Horváth, I.S.; Sjöde, A.; Nilvebrant, N.O.; Jönsson, L.J. Ammonium hydroxide detoxification of spruce acid hydrolysates. In Twenty-Sixth Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 911–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kononov, G.N.; Verevkin, A.N.; Serdyukova, Y.V.; Mironov, D.A. Wood as a chemical raw material. History and modernity. IV. Delignification of wood as a way to produce cellulose. Part I. For. Bull. 2022, 26, 97–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nepenin, N.N. Production of sulfite pulp. In Pulp Technology; Nepenin, N.N., Nepenin, Y.N., Eds.; Forestry Industry: Moscow, Russia, 1976; Volume 1, p. 624. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  53. Rueda, C.; Calvo, P.A.; Moncalián, G.; Ruiz, G.; Coz, A. Biorefinery options to valorize the spent liquor from sulfite pulping. J. Chem. Tech. Biotech. 2015, 90, 2218–2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Asadollahzadeh, M.T.; Ghasemian, A.; Saraeian, A.R.; Resalati, H.; Lennartsson, P.R.; Taherzadeh, M.J. Ethanol and biomass production from spent sulfite liquor by filamentous fungi. Int. J. Biotech. Bioeng. 2017, 11, 718–724. [Google Scholar]
  55. Rahman, M.; Avelin, A.; Kyprianidis, K. A Review on the modeling, control and diagnostics of continuous pulp digesters. Processes 2020, 8, 1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Balkissoon, S.; Andrew, J.; Sithole, B. Dissolving wood pulp production: A review. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2022, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ek, M.; Gellerstedt, G.; Henriksson, G. Pulping Chemistry and Technology. In Pulp and Paper Chemistry and Technology; Ek, M., Gellerstedt, G., Henriksson, G., Eds.; Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.: Berlin, Germany, 2009; Volume 2, p. 471. [Google Scholar]
  58. Li, M.; Yuan, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Jiang, B.; Wu, W.; Wu, S.; Jin, Y. Comparison of sulfomethylated lignin from poplar and masson pine on cellulase adsorption and the enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 343, 126142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Jin, Y.; Yang, L.; Jameel, H.; Chang, H.M.; Phillips, R. Sodium sulfite–formaldehyde pretreatment of mixed hardwoods and its effect on enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 135, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Przybysz Buzała, K.; Kalinowska, H.; Małachowska, E.; Boruszewski, P.; Krajewski, K.; Przybysz, P. The effect of lignin content in birch and beech kraft cellulosic pulps on simple sugar yields from the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Energies 2019, 12, 2952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, C.; Lu, X.; Gao, J.; Li, X.; Zhao, J. Xylo-oligosaccharides inhibit enzymatic hydrolysis by influencing enzymatic activity of cellulase from Penicillium oxalicum. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 9427–9437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kuenz, A.; Jäger, M.; Niemi, H.; Kallioinen, M.; Mänttäri, M.; Prüße, U. Conversion of xylose from birch hemicellulose hydrolysate to 2,3-butanediol with Bacillus vallismortis. Fermentation 2020, 6, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Puentes, J.G.; Mateo, S.; Sánchez, S.; Roberto, I.C.; Moya, A.J. Bioconversion study of olive tree biomass hemicellulosic hydrolysates by Candida guilliermondii at different scales for ethanol and xylitol production. Fermentation 2023, 9, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Abdel-Rahman, M.A.; Hassan, S.E.-D.; Alrefaey, H.M.A.; Elsakhawy, T. Efficient co-utilization of biomass-derived mixed sugars for lactic acid production by Bacillus coagulans Azu-10. Fermentation 2021, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Procópio, D.P.; Kendrick, E.; Goldbeck, R.; Damasio, A.R.D.L.; Franco, T.T.; Leak, D.J.; Jin, Y.S.; Basso, T.O. Xylo-oligosaccharide utilization by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce ethanol. Front. Bioeng. Biotech. 2022, 10, 825981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Novy, V.; Krahulec, S.; Longus, K.; Klimacek, M.; Nidetzky, B. Co-fermentation of hexose and pentose sugars in a spent sulfite liquor matrix with genetically modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 130, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cheng, L.; Huang, R.; Ying, J.; Fu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Jiang, K. Sequential bioprocess with Gluconobacter oxydans and Candida tropicalis for gluconic acid and single-cell protein production from enzymatic hydrolysate. Fermentation 2023, 9, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hama, S.; Mizuno, S.; Kihara, M.; Tanaka, T.; Ogino, C.; Noda, H.; Kondo, A. Production of D-lactic acid from hardwood pulp by mechanical milling followed by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using metabolically engineered Lactobacillus plantarum. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 187, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Pérez-García, F.; Burgardt, A.; Kallman, D.R.; Wendisch, V.F.; Bar, N. Dynamic co-cultivation process of Corynebacterium glutamicum strains for the fermentative production of riboflavin. Fermentation 2021, 7, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Osorio-González, C.S.; Saini, R.; Hegde, K.; Brar, S.K.; Lefebvre, A.; Avalos Ramírez, A. Crabtree effect on Rhodosporidium toruloides using wood hydrolysate as a culture media. Fermentation 2023, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhong, C.; Ukowitz, C.; Domig, K.J.; Nidetzky, B. Short-chain cello-oligosaccharides: Intensification and scale-up of their enzymatic production and selective growth promotion among probiotic bacteria. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 8557–8567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Deng, J.; Yun, J.; Gu, Y.; Yan, B.; Yin, B.; Huang, C. Evaluating the in vitro and in vivo prebiotic effects of different xylo-oligosaccharides obtained from bamboo shoots by hydrothermal pretreatment combined with endo-xylanase hydrolysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Mayorova, K.; Aksenov, A.; Shevchenko, A. Wood microcrystalline cellulose: Preparation and pharmaceutical applications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Emerging Trends and Technologies, Stavropol, Russia, 5–6 October 2023. [Google Scholar]
  74. Tyshkunova, I.V.; Poshina, D.N.; Skorik, Y.A. Cellulose cryogels as promising materials for biomedical applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cellulose conversion by P. verruculosum enzymes at low pulp concentrations.
Figure 1. Cellulose conversion by P. verruculosum enzymes at low pulp concentrations.
Fermentation 09 00936 g001
Figure 2. Accumulation of glucose and xylose during enzymatic hydrolysis of industrial sulfite (a) and kraft (b) pulps at high pulp concentration.
Figure 2. Accumulation of glucose and xylose during enzymatic hydrolysis of industrial sulfite (a) and kraft (b) pulps at high pulp concentration.
Fermentation 09 00936 g002
Figure 3. Degree of polymerization for initial and biomodified pulps.
Figure 3. Degree of polymerization for initial and biomodified pulps.
Fermentation 09 00936 g003
Figure 4. Crystallinity changes in cellulosic pulps under hydrolysis by P. verruculosum enzymes.
Figure 4. Crystallinity changes in cellulosic pulps under hydrolysis by P. verruculosum enzymes.
Fermentation 09 00936 g004
Figure 5. Biomodified pulp composition.
Figure 5. Biomodified pulp composition.
Fermentation 09 00936 g005
Figure 6. Possible strategies of sulfite pulp bioprocessing.
Figure 6. Possible strategies of sulfite pulp bioprocessing.
Fermentation 09 00936 g006
Figure 7. Possible strategies for kraft pulp bioprocessing.
Figure 7. Possible strategies for kraft pulp bioprocessing.
Fermentation 09 00936 g007
Table 1. Pulp composition.
Table 1. Pulp composition.
ComponentKraft Pulp, %Sulfite Pulp, %
Cellulose72.0 ± 1.478.9 ± 1.3
Xylan23.7 ± 1.17.0 ± 0.5
Mannan3.0 ± 0.69.1 ± 0.5
Others1.3 ± 0.45.0 ± 1.5
Table 2. Activities of the P. verruculosum enzyme complex (U adjusted to 10 FPU per 1 g of dry pulp).
Table 2. Activities of the P. verruculosum enzyme complex (U adjusted to 10 FPU per 1 g of dry pulp).
CMC-aseMCC-aseXylanaseMannanaseβ-GlucosidaseCellobiase
286 ± 1.9419.8 ± 0.122326 ± 6.229.1 ± 0.1526.4 ± 0.1210.9 ± 0.08
Table 3. Concentrations (g/L) of cellobiose and hemicellulose oligomers in pulp hydrolysates.
Table 3. Concentrations (g/L) of cellobiose and hemicellulose oligomers in pulp hydrolysates.
PulpHydrolysis TimeCellobioseMonosaccharides from Hemicelluloses
Oligomers after Acid Inversion
XyloseMannose
Sulfite243.73.46.5
483.34.26.8
Kraft244.24.61.7
484.75.32.0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shevchenko, A.R.; Mayorova, K.A.; Chukhchin, D.G.; Malkov, A.V.; Toptunov, E.A.; Telitsin, V.D.; Rozhkova, A.M.; Zorov, I.N.; Rodicheva, M.A.; Plakhin, V.A.; et al. Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Kraft and Sulfite Pulps: What Is the Best Cellulosic Substrate for Industrial Saccharification? Fermentation 2023, 9, 936. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9110936

AMA Style

Shevchenko AR, Mayorova KA, Chukhchin DG, Malkov AV, Toptunov EA, Telitsin VD, Rozhkova AM, Zorov IN, Rodicheva MA, Plakhin VA, et al. Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Kraft and Sulfite Pulps: What Is the Best Cellulosic Substrate for Industrial Saccharification? Fermentation. 2023; 9(11):936. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9110936

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shevchenko, Aleksandr R., Ksenia A. Mayorova, Dmitry G. Chukhchin, Alexey V. Malkov, Evgeniy A. Toptunov, Vadim D. Telitsin, Aleksandra M. Rozhkova, Ivan N. Zorov, Maria A. Rodicheva, Vadim A. Plakhin, and et al. 2023. "Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Kraft and Sulfite Pulps: What Is the Best Cellulosic Substrate for Industrial Saccharification?" Fermentation 9, no. 11: 936. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9110936

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop