Next Article in Journal
An Assessment of the Functional Properties of Black Amaranth Flour During Fermentation with Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria
Previous Article in Journal
Light and Temperature Effects on the Accumulation of Carotenoids in Rhodotorula spp. Yeasts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adding Ethanol to the Batch and Continuous Transplantation Co-Culture of Maize Straw Fermented by Rumen Fluid for the Production of Caproic Acid

1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
2
Institutes of Agricultural Science and Technology Development, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2025, 11(7), 413; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11070413
Submission received: 12 May 2025 / Revised: 13 July 2025 / Accepted: 16 July 2025 / Published: 18 July 2025

Abstract

In this study, to enhance the concentration of caproic acid generated from maize straw fermentation and clarify the structures of bacterial and fungal communities within the serially subcultured rumen microbial fermentation system, maize straw was used as the substrate. In a continuous subculture system, the impacts of ethanol addition on pH and gas production were explored, with a focus on the caproic acid yield in the final (eighth generation) generation and alterations in bacterial and fungal communities. The results showed that the relative abundances of unidentified_Clostridiales, Shuttleworthia, and Syntrophococcus in ethanol-driven caproic acid production were enriched by 5.36-fold, 2.61-fold, and 2.25-fold, respectively. This consequently increased the concentration of caproic acid in the fermentation broth to 1492 mg/L, representing a 3.7-fold increase. These findings are highly significant for the high-value utilization of maize straw waste to produce caproic acid via the carboxylic acid platform using rumen microorganisms in industrial processing.

1. Introduction

Lignocellulosic fibers stand out as the most intensively researched biomass for alternative resource utilization. Agricultural waste, in particular, is a highly valuable lignocellulosic resource due to its abundant availability, high yield, and relatively low cost [1]. Maize, as the world’s second-largest agricultural crop, generates substantial straw waste, with China alone producing over 10 million tons annually [2]. The conversion of maize stover into value-added products and the alleviation of environmental impacts from straw accumulation are urgent challenges that require innovative solutions. Microbial anaerobic fermentation offers a viable approach to transform agricultural waste into a variety of industrial products, including organic acids, biofuels, enzymes, and lipids [3,4,5,6]. Optimizing microbial fermentation technology for the utilization of maize stover is a strategic direction for creating a cleaner and more sustainable environment.
Anaerobic fermentation of straw is a four-stage process comprising hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis [7]. During the hydrolysis stage, complex macromolecules such as cellulose, starch, proteins, and lipids are broken down into simpler monomers–sugars, amino acids, and fatty acids. These monomers are then converted into short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), ethanol, hydrogen (H2), and carbon dioxide (CO2) in the acidogenesis phase. Acetogenesis involves the conversion of SCFAs and ethanol into acetate, which is subsequently converted to methane (CH4) either directly or through the reduction of CO2. Methane production is an effective and sustainable method for processing large amounts of lignocellulosic waste to meet global energy demands. SCFAs are more valuable than biomethane as they can be further converted into high-value-added chemicals, such as bioplastics and biofuels including biodiesel [8,9,10]. Additionally, SCFAs can be transformed into medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) through beta-oxidation, a process that is gaining attention for its potential to yield products of higher economic value [11,12].
Rumen microorganisms are well-known for their remarkable degradation abilities, especially in breaking down plant materials rich in fiber, such as maize straw. The rumen’s lignocellulosic biomass decomposition efficiency is estimated to be threefold higher compared to traditional anaerobic digesters [13]. The rumen microbiota converts biomass into SCFAs, supplying nutrients for ruminants [14], and also produces gases like methane and carbon dioxide. The synthesis of SCFAs and gaseous byproducts is achieved through synergistic interactions within diverse microbial communities [15]. The formation of SCFAs requires the participation of electron donors (EDs) and electron acceptors (EAs), initiating from acetic acid and extending the carbon chain via reverse β-oxidation [16]. Ethanol, a well-known ED in fermentation processes, is oxidized to generate acetyl-CoA, which can engage in reverse β-oxidation. Additionally, the acetyl-CoA produced can promote chain elongation from acetic acid to butyric acid and facilitate the hexanoic acid pathway from butyric acid [17,18,19]. Ma et al. significantly increased the caproic acid production to 1473 mg by adding ethanol as an ED to the co-fermentation system of rice straw and rumen fluid, and found that the conversion rate of segmented addition was nearly twice as high as that of one-time addition (17.69% vs. 7.38%) [20]. Although our previous research has demonstrated that ethanol, as an electron donor, can increase the elongation rate of SCFA chains in the mixed culture of in vitro rumen-fermented switchgrass [21], there are still two issues that remain unclear at present: (1) the exact effect of adding ethanol on the relatively large biomass of maize straw and (2) whether caproic acid production from straw fermentation can be increased by domesticating rumen microorganisms through continuous batch culture.
We hypothesize that the addition of ethanol can promote the elongation of fatty acid chains during the fermentation of maize straw by rumen fluid through the reverse β-oxidation pathway. Additionally, continuous subculturing for domesticating rumen microorganisms will enhance the production of caproic acid by optimizing the composition of the microbial community and metabolic pathways. By investigating the underlying mechanisms and the impact on microbial communities, the research provides valuable insights into the utilization of agricultural waste resources.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Substrate and Rumen Fluid

The experimental procedures concerning animals were approved by the Animal Care Committee at Yangzhou University (Yangzhou, China). The maize straw was obtained from the Animal Nutrition and Feed Engineering Technology Research Center, Yangzhou University, Jiangsu Province, China. Maize straw was dried at 65 °C for 48 h, then ground through a 0.50 mm sieve, and sealed in hermetic/air-tight bags for later use. Ruminal fluid was obtained from two dry-lactation Holstein cows with permanent ruminal fistulas fed twice daily (8:00 and 16:00) with a 40:60 concentrate to roughage ratio diet and free access to water at the experimental farm of Yangzhou University (Gaoyou, China). Ruminal contents were collected before morning feeding, filtered through 4 layers of sterile gauze and brought back to the laboratory immediately and placed in a 39 °C water bath [22].

2.2. Sequential Batch Culture

To mimic conventional in vitro fermentation protocols and perceived use of mixed ruminal inocula for industrial SCFA and MCFA production in “open-culture” reactor microbiomes, all experiments were conducted under non-aseptic conditions, without sterilization of vessels, medium components, or transfer equipment [23]. The saliva buffer was prepared according to Menke’s method: 1.10 mg L−1 CaCl2·2H2O, 0.83 mg L−1 MnCl2·4H2O, 0.08 mg L−1 CoCl2·6H2O, 0.67 mg L−1 FeCl3·6H2O, 5.83 mg L−1 NaHCO3, 0.95 mg L−1 Na2HPO4, 1.03 mg L−1 KH2PO4, and 0.10 mg L−1 MgSO4·7H2O, all reagents are from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China [24]. Maize straw (0.80 g) as fermentation substrate was weighed into 128 mL volume glass anaerobic culture flask before inoculation. An amount of 15 mL buffer and 2 mL rumen fluid were mixed and O2 was removed by continuously flushing with CO2. An amount of 0.15 mL of 2.5% sodium sulfide solution (w/v) was added as reduced reagent. An amount of 0.2 mL of anhydrous ethanol was supplemented in the flask, sealed with a rubber stopper with an aluminum cap and incubated at 39 °C for 72 h. The control (CON) group consisted of flasks containing substrates without ethanol addition. The ethanol (ETH) and CON groups each consisted of six replicate bottles, totaling twelve bottles. The gas volume at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h was recorded to calculate gas production. The pH value and VFA production of fermentation fluid were tested at 72 h.
All continuous subculture procedures were similar to batch culture. At the first 72 h (first generation), 2 mL of culture fluid was transferred into new 128 mL flasks containing fresh culture media and substrates. The pH value and gas production were monitored during the culture period. After seven batch transfers, samples were collected for the analysis of pH, VFA, and bacterial composition, corresponding to the eighth generation.

2.3. Sampling and Analysis

The pH value of the fermentation liquid was determined by pH meter (PHS-25 produced by Shanghai Electronic Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The pressure values in the flasks at each time point were determined using pressure gauge (barometer DPG1000B15PSG-5, CeComp Electronics Inc., Libertyville, IL, USA) [21,24]. The following calculation equation was applied:
Vgas = Vj × Ppsi × 0.068004084,
where Vgas is the gas volume at 39 °C, mL, Vj is the vial volume headspace of liquid (110 mL in this study), mL, and Ppsi is the pressure of the vial, psi.
At each sampling time, the fermentation mixture was collected using a syringe, and the samples were pretreated for determination later. Briefly, fermentation liquid was centrifuged (12,000 r/min, 20 min), and 1 mL supernatant was mixed with 0.2 mL A total of 20% of metaphosphoric acid (containing 60 mM crotonic acid) was kept overnight in a refrigerator at −20 °C. After thawing, the acidified samples were centrifuged (12,000 r/min, 10 min, 4 °C) and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm water phase filter membrane. The percentages of the individual VFA (Acetic, propionic, butyric, valeric, and caproic acid were measured by gas chromatography (GC-3800, Shanghai Kechuang Chromatography Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and column type, the same as the gas assay above. The temperature of the injector, column, and detector was 200 °C, 110 °C, and 200 °C, respectively. The carrier gas was nitrogen, with 50 mL min−1 flow rate and 1 μL injection volume. In addition to quantifying g/L individual concentrations of individual and total SCFA, total alkyl concentrations (TAL) and average SCFA chain lengths (ACL) were calculated as previously described [12,21]:
(1) Total mM alkyl groups, the sum of all methyl and methylene groups in SCFA, i.e., total mM alkyl groups (hereafter designated TAL) = C2 + (2 × C3) + (3 × C4) + (4 × C5) + (5 × C6), where Cx corresponds to mM concentration of SCFA of carbon number x.
(2) Average SCFA chain length (hereafter designated ACL) = (total mM alkyl groups/total mM SCFA) + 1, where the 1 represents the nonenergetic carbon (carboxyl group) of the SCFA molecule.
The amplification primers for 16S rDNA sequencing were 515F and 806R of the 16S V4 region (515F: 5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and (806R: 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′). The ITS amplicon sequencing primers are ITS5-1737F to ITS2-2043R (1737F: 5′-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3′, 2043R: 5′-GCTGCGTTCTTCAT CGATGC-3′). The PCR products were sent to Novogene Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) for high-throughput sequencing analysis. Microbial sequencing was analyzed as elaborated previously [25]. In brief, the raw data were read using FASTP (Version 0.14.1), followed by denoising with the DADA2 module in QIIME2 (Version 1.9.1). Sequences with an abundance of less than 5 were filtered out to obtain the final amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) and feature table. Finally, ASVs were compared with the SILVA (version 138.1) database to determine species information. Based on the ASV data, QIIME2 was used to calculate α-diversity indices, including Ace, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The significance of differences was determined using independent samples of T-tests and univariate general linear models in the SPSS 26.0 software. The test results were expressed as “mean ± standard deviation”, with p-value less than 0.05, indicating significant differences. To reveal the intrinsic associations between microbial communities and fermentation products, canonical correlation analysis (CCA) and visualization of the results were performed using Chiplot (https://www.chiplot.online/) (accessed on 27 January 2025) [26]. It should be noted that due to the insufficient readings of ITS, one sample had to be removed from the ETH group.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effects of Ethanol on Continuous Subcultured Culture of Maize Straw with Rumen Liquid

3.1.1. pH and Gas Production

Using rumen fluid as the inoculum and 72 h fermentation fluid for continuous subculture, maize stover was fermented to produce acid. Ethanol was added as an electron donor (ED) to promote chain elongation via β-oxidation for caproic acid production. The variations in pH and gas production during anaerobic fermentation across different generations are shown in Figure 1. The addition of ethanol and eight consecutive subculturing cycles of the enriched cultures in the same medium led to significant changes in the fermentation pH and total gas production. In the continuous subculturing processes, the pH values at the end of each cycle generally ranged from 5.2 to 6.7 (mean = 5.81), and each culture cycle produced 80~120 mL (mean = 99.5 mL) of gas. The significant increase in the pH of the fermentation broth with ethanol addition compared to the CON group might be due to the effective use of ED to promote organic acid chain elongation, thereby reducing the H+ ion concentration in the fermentation broth [18,27,28].

3.1.2. Ethanol Promotes the Production of Caproic Acid and Chain Extension

Adding ethanol to the fermentation of maize stover with rumen fluid led to acetate dominance, with propionate, butyrate, valerate, and caproate contents (in g/L) being successively lower (Figure 2). Prior to subculturing, although ethanol addition to the fermentation could reduce propionate production and increase caproate production, it did not significantly increase the total VFA yield or the average chain length (ACL) (CON: 2.87 vs. ETH: 2.87). However, after subculturing, consistent with expectations, the ETH group exhibited reduced production of propionate (CON: 1.66 g/L vs. ETH: 0.18 g/L), butyrate (CON: 1.25 g/L vs. ETH: 0.51 g/L), and valerate (CON: 0.58 g/L vs. ETH: 0.24 g/L), along with enhanced caproate production increased by 3.7-fold (CON: 0.4 g/L vs. ETH: 1.49 g/L) and an extended average VFA chain length (CON: 3.09 vs. ETH: 3.66). Additionally, valerate production and ACL extension were influenced by the interaction between ethanol addition and subculturing.
Early studies have shown that ethanol, as an electron donor, generates acetyl-CoA by supplying reducing equivalents like NADH and FADH2. Acetyl-CoA is a key intermediate in the reverse β-oxidation (RBO) cycle for carbon chain elongation [12,29,30,31]. In our experiment, ethanol was metabolized by rumen microorganisms into intermediate products such as acetyl-CoA, which participated in caproate synthesis, thereby increasing caproate production. The average chain length of VFA naturally increases with the elevation of caproic acid production, as caproic acid has a longer carbon chain. Upon ethanol addition to the maize stover–rumen fluid fermentation, a similar RBO pathway may be activated, prompting microorganisms to convert more substrates into caproate while reducing propionate and butyrate production. Moreover, during subculturing, microorganisms continuously adapt to metabolic product changes and further adjust their metabolic pathways [21,32]. As the number of subcultures increases, microbial ethanol utilization efficiency improves, potentially yielding more caproate. Enhanced feedback inhibition amplifies the impact on valerate production and ACL, thus forming an interactive effect between ethanol addition and subculturing.

3.2. Microbial Community Analysis

3.2.1. Alpha and Beta Diversity Analysis

Ethanol significantly reduced the ACE, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices of bacteria (Table 1). Overall, ethanol addition had no significant effect on fungal species richness (Ace and Chao1 indices) but significantly increased the fungal community’s Shannon diversity index (p = 0.035). This indicates that ethanol has a potential positive effect on fungal community diversity under the experimental conditions, yet has little impact on community dominance. It suggests that ethanol reduces bacterial species number and diversity, simplifying the community structure. Additionally, certain species became dominant in the community, suppressing other species’ growth. This finding is consistent with our previous research on wheat straw and ethanol in vitro co-culture, where ethanol increased valeric and caproic acid production, and bacteria played a more crucial role than fungi [22]. On the other hand, ethanol-caused reduction in bacterial richness and diversity implies that some bacteria could not survive [21,22,33]. The decrease in pH and gas production might be associated with these changes in bacterial richness and diversity.

3.2.2. Community Structure of Bacteria and Fungi

The top 10 most abundant bacterial and fungal phyla in terms of relative abundance are shown in Figure 3A,C. Compared with the CON group, ethanol significantly increased the relative abundance of Firmicutes (p = 0.001) and significantly decreased those of Bacteroidetes (p = 0.009), Actinobacteria (p = 0.004), and Spirochaetes (p = 0.001). Ethanol had no significant effect on the relative abundances of Basidiomycota (p = 0.673) and Ascomycota (p = 0.454), the major components of the fungal community (Table A1). Firmicutes are often involved in carbohydrate metabolism during rumen fermentation; Bacteroidetes play a role in polysaccharide degradation [34,35]; Actinobacteria can decompose complex organic substances (such as polysaccharides, cellulose, starch, chitin, etc.) and promote nutrient cycling [36]; and Spirochaetes act synergistically with other microorganisms (such as Fibrobacteres) and participate in lignocellulose degradation [37]. Such significant changes in dominant bacterial phyla indicate that ethanol can profoundly affect the bacterial metabolic networks and functions in fermentation.
The top 20 bacterial and fungal genera in terms of relative abundance are shown in Figure 3B,D. Ethanol addition induced significant shifts in multiple genera within Firmicutes (Table A2). Specifically, the relative abundances of unidentified_Clostridiales (p = 0.006), Shuttleworthia (p = 0.016), and Syntrophococcus (p = 0.043) were markedly higher in the ETH group than in the CON group, indicating their potential roles in ethanol-associated metabolic processes and specific fermentation pathways. In contrast, the relative abundances of Solobacterium (p < 0.001) and Mitsuokella (p = 0.01) were substantially lower in the ETH group, suggesting ethanol-mediated growth inhibition and potential disruption of their original functions in the fermentation system. Within Bacteroidetes, the abundance of unidentified_Rikenellaceae (p = 0.016) was significantly reduced in the ETH group, whereas unidentified_Prevotellaceae abundance showed no significant difference (p = 0.233). In Actinobacteria and Spirochaetes, the relative abundances of Pseudoscardovia (p = 0.004) and unidentified_Spirochaetaceae (p = 0.001) were notably lower in the ETH group, indicating ethanol strongly inhibited these genera and likely interfered with their roles in lignocellulose degradation and nutrient cycling. For the fungal community at the genus level, ethanol significantly reduced the relative abundance of Symmetrospora (Basidiomycota, p = 0.044) in the ETH group, which may affect the metabolic functions of Basidiomycota during fermentation. However, most Basidiomycota genera (e.g., Wallemia [p = 0.841], Hannaella [p = 0.682]) exhibited no significant differences, indicating their stability and ethanol resistance in the fermentation system. In Ascomycota, Aspergillus (p = 0.002) and Acremonium (p = 0.008) showed substantially lower abundances in the ETH group, suggesting ethanol suppressed these genera and potentially altered metabolic processes such as substrate conversion. Overall, ethanol had a more limited impact on the fungal community at the genus level, with most genera showing stable abundances.
PCoA results show that ethanol remarkably alters the bacterial community structure in the fermentation broth but has no significant effect on the fungal community (Figure 4A,E). SIMPER analysis revealed that changes in Lactobacillus, Megasphaera, Shuttleworthia, and unidentified_Clostridiales were key drivers of bacterial community differentiation between groups; Wallemia, Pholiota, and Aspergillus were the primary genera contributing to fungal community differences (Figure 4B,F). LEfSe results further indicated that unidentified_Clostridiales, Shuttleworthia, and Syntrophococcus were biomarker bacteria for the ETH group, while Solobacterium, Mitsuokella, unidentified_Rikenellaceae, and Pseudoscardovia characterized the CON group. Aspergillus emerged as the key taxon differentiating the fungal community structure (Figure 4C,D,G,H).
Mechanistically, specific microorganisms utilize acetic, propionic, and butyric acids alongside ED (e.g., ethanol) to elongate carbon chains via fatty acid β-oxidation, generating valeric and caproic acids. Ethanol, as a critical ED for chain elongation, facilitates the production of medium-chain fatty acids [38]. Clostridiales, a well-documented ethanol-utilizing taxon, drives caproic acid synthesis from acetic acid through reverse β-oxidation [29,39,40]. Studies have shown that co-culturing Clostridium kluyveri with ruminal bacteria accelerates carbon chain elongation and enhances caproic acid production [12]. In this study, unidentified_Clostridiales was the dominant genus in ethanol-driven caproate production, with a relative abundance of 20.97% in the ETH group (5.36-fold higher than CON). Syntrophococcus (8.42% in ETH), capable of generating acetic acid from formic acid (a sugar oxidation product), provided essential precursors for caproate biosynthesis [41]. Shuttleworthia, with a 160% increase in relative abundance in ETH, likely participates in ethanol-dependent caproic acid metabolism, further supporting the observed chain elongation.

3.2.3. Correlation Between Microorganisms and Fatty Acid Production

To investigate the effects of ethanol on microbial community structure and its interaction with environmental factors, canonical correlation analysis (CCA) was performed. The results revealed that key bacterial genera including unidentified_Clostridiales, Syntrophococcus, and Shuttleworthia were strongly associated with caproic acid and average chain length (ACL), whereas pH was a critical environmental factor shaping the bacterial community structure (Figure 5A). Gas production-related parameters significantly influenced the fungal community structure, as shown in Figure 5B.
To further clarify the associations between the microbial community and fermentation indicators, Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to examine relationships between microbial genera and fermentation parameters. The results indicated that the fungal community exhibited weaker correlations with fatty acid production compared to the bacterial community. Specifically, Aspergillus (R = −0.836; p = 0.001) and Acremonium (R = −0.664; p = 0.026) in Ascomycota showed negative correlations with caproic acid production (Figure 5D).
Consistent with expectations, the bacterial community was closely associated with fatty acid production. In Firmicutes, unidentified_Clostridiales (R = 0.839; p < 0.001), Shuttleworthia (R = 0.748; p = 0.005), Syntrophococcus (R = 0.685; p = 0.014), and Dialister (R = 0.683; p = 0.014) exhibited significant positive correlations with caproate. Additionally, unidentified_Clostridiales (R = 0.797; p = 0.002), Syntrophococcus (R = 0.58; p = 0.048), and Dialister (R = 0.739; p = 0.006) were positively correlated with ACL, indicating their potential roles in caproic acid biosynthesis and carbon chain elongation. In contrast, Pseudoscardovia (Actinobacteria, R = −0.601; p = 0.039), Solobacterium (Firmicutes, R = −0.692; p = 0.013), Mitsuokella (Firmicutes, R = −0.741; p = 0.006), unidentified_Rikenellaceae (Firmicutes, R = −0.741; p = 0.006), and unidentified_Spirochaetaceae (Spirochaetes, R = −0.741; p = 0.006) showed negative correlations with caproate production, consistent with their low relative abundances in the ETH group. These observations may be attributed to ethanol-mediated antibacterial effects or poor adaptation to long-term in vitro subculturing. Notably, genera positively correlated with caproic acid production were negatively correlated with acetic, butyric, and valeric acid production, and vice versa, aligning with the fermentation results where ethanol promoted the elongation of short-chain fatty acids into caproic acid.
In conclusion, this study demonstrated that after eight generations of in vitro domestication, rumen microorganisms can still facilitate short-chain fatty acid chain elongation in maize straw fermentation through electron donor addition, thereby enhancing caproic acid production. Key bacterial genera unidentified_Clostridiales, Shuttleworthia, and Syntrophococcus play critical roles in this process. Future studies should focus on isolating and purifying these microorganisms to validate their functional contributions to caproic acid production.

4. Conclusions

Adding ethanol during in vitro rumen fermentation inhibits the production of acetic and propionic acids while enhancing caproic acid biosynthesis. This study demonstrates that ethanol enables rumen microorganisms to convert acetic and propionic acids into caproic acid when maize stover serves as the fermentation substrate. Specifically, the bacterial genera unidentified_Clostridiales, Shuttleworthia, and Syntrophococcus stably utilize ethanol to facilitate caproic acid production across multiple generations of in vitro subculturing. Rumen fungi exhibit minimal effect on the carbon chain elongation of volatile fatty acids, with bacterial communities playing a dominant role in this process. Future research should focus on further validation through pilot-scale or larger-scale trials to evaluate the stability and applicability of this strategy under actual production conditions, thus providing more direct references for industrial applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.C. and M.L.; methodology, Z.C. and Y.S.; software, Z.C. and W.L.; validation, Z.C., Z.M. and L.L.; formal analysis, Z.C. and Z.M.; investigation, Z.C. and Y.S.; resources, G.Z. and M.L.; data curation, Z.C. and M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.C., Z.M. and L.L.; writing—review and editing, M.L. and L.W.; visualization, Z.C., Z.M. and W.L.; supervision, Z.C. and M.L.; project administration, M.L.; funding acquisition, M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Project (2024-02-08-00-12-F00023); the earmarked fund for CARS (CARS-36).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Yangzhou University (SYXK(Su)2016-0019, approve of date: 6 April 2016).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Effects of ethanol addition on the relative abundances of bacterial and fungal communities at the phylum level in in vitro fermented maize straw (with an average relative abundance of at least one treatment ≥ 1%).
Table A1. Effects of ethanol addition on the relative abundances of bacterial and fungal communities at the phylum level in in vitro fermented maize straw (with an average relative abundance of at least one treatment ≥ 1%).
PhylumTreatmentsp-Value
CON 1ETH 2
Bacterial
Firmicutes54.11 ± 2.4278.58 ± 5.010.001
Bacteroidetes27.89 ± 1.9915.58 ± 3.210.009
Actinobacteria14.35 ± 1.404.31 ± 2.270.004
Spirochaetes1.72 ± 0.260.08 ± 0.030.001
Proteobacteria1.39 ± 0.180.82 ± 0.200.061
Fungi
Basidiomycota56.39 ± 1.5657.34 ± 1.470.673
Ascomycota16.97 ± 1.0215.59 ± 1.510.454
1 Each value represents the mean ± SE of 6 replicates (n = 6); 2 In the ETH group, fungal data are presented as the mean ± standard error (SE) of 5 replicates (n = 5).
Table A2. Effects of ethanol addition on the relative abundances of bacterial and fungal communities at the genus level in in vitro fermented maize straw (with an average relative abundance of at least one treatment ≥ 0.5%).
Table A2. Effects of ethanol addition on the relative abundances of bacterial and fungal communities at the genus level in in vitro fermented maize straw (with an average relative abundance of at least one treatment ≥ 0.5%).
PhylumGenusTreatmentsp-Value
CON 1ETH 2
Bacterial
Firmicutesunidentified_Clostridiales3.91 ± 0.5820.97 ± 3.750.006
Shuttleworthia4.09 ± 0.6210.7 ± 1.890.016
unidentified_Lachnospiraceae8.27 ± 1.215.00 ± 2.290.237
Syntrophococcus3.74 ± 0.508.42 ± 1.750.043
Solobacterium5.98 ± 0.601.44 ± 0.29<0.001
Mitsuokella3.26 ± 0.790.03 ± 0.010.010
Succiniclasticum3.60 ± 0.331.84 ± 0.600.027
Dialister0.02 ± 0.001.77 ± 0.690.053
Lactobacillus1.20 ± 0.231.75 ± 0.360.226
Oribacterium1.36 ± 0.191.16 ± 0.250.547
Bacteroidetesunidentified_Prevotellaceae15.29 ± 1.3411.69 ± 2.50.233
unidentified_Rikenellaceae2.88 ± 0.800.02 ± 0.010.016
ActinobacteriaPseudoscardovia13.36 ± 1.423.41 ± 2.240.004
Spirochaetesunidentified_Spirochaetaceae1.69 ± 0.260.08 ± 0.030.001
Fungi
BasidiomycotaWallemia23.00 ± 4.0022.00 ± 2.220.841
Hannaella9.63 ± 0.9510.42 ± 1.730.682
Symmetrospora8.24 ± 1.274.93 ± 0.220.044
Tricholoma2.11 ± 0.853.78 ± 1.20.274
Geminibasidium1.75 ± 0.822.08 ± 0.560.762
Papiliotrema3.11 ± 0.342.52 ± 0.710.452
Sterigmatomyces2.18 ± 0.372.04 ± 0.430.810
Erythrobasidium1.48 ± 0.412.18 ± 0.200.184
Russula0.64 ± 0.291.37 ± 0.570.259
AscomycotaCladosporium5.84 ± 0.465.82 ± 1.320.984
Aspergillus4.83 ± 0.232.58 ± 0.490.002
Acremonium1.13 ± 0.140.47 ± 0.130.008
Pichia0.51 ± 0.151.03 ± 0.640.403
1 Each value represents the mean ± SE of 6 replicates (n = 6); 2 In the ETH group, fungal data are presented as the mean ± standard error (SE) of 5 replicates (n = 5).

References

  1. Langsdorf, A.; Volkmar, M.; Holtmann, D.; Ulber, R. Material Utilization of Green Waste: A Review on Potential Valorization Methods. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2021, 8, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pang, Y.Z.; Liu, Y.P.; Li, X.J.; Wang, K.S.; Yuan, H.R. Improving Biodegradability and Biogas Production of Corn Stover through Sodium Hydroxide Solid State Pretreatment. Energy Fuels 2008, 22, 2761–2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ajayi-Banji, A.A.; Rahman, S.; Cihacek, L.; Nahar, N. Comparison of the Reactor Performance of Alkaline-Pretreated Corn Stover Co-Digested with Dairy Manure Under Solid-State. Waste Biomass Valor. 2020, 11, 5211–5222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gong, Z.; Wang, X.; Yuan, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Wang, G.; Liu, Y. Fed-Batch Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Alkaline Organosolv-Pretreated Corn Stover Facilitating High Concentrations and Yields of Fermentable Sugars for Microbial Lipid Production. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2020, 13, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Méndez-Hernández, J.E.; Loera, O.; Méndez-Hernández, E.M.; Herrera, E.; Arce-Cervantes, O.; Soto-Cruz, N.Ó. Fungal Pretreatment of Corn Stover by Fomes Sp. EUM1: Simultaneous Production of Readily Hydrolysable Biomass and Useful Biocatalysts. Waste Biomass Valor. 2019, 10, 2637–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Cai, D.; Zhao, G. Co-Generation of Ethanol and l-Lactic Acid from Corn Stalk under a Hybrid Process. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Taherzadeh, M.; Karimi, K. Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Wastes to Improve Ethanol and Biogas Production: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 9, 1621–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kim, N.-J.; Park, G.W.; Kang, J.; Kim, Y.-C.; Chang, H.N. Volatile Fatty Acid Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass by Lime Pretreatment and Its Applications to Industrial Biotechnology. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2013, 18, 1163–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tu, W.; Zhang, D.; Wang, H. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) Production from Fermented Thermal-Hydrolyzed Sludge by Mixed Microbial Cultures: The Link between Phosphorus and PHA Yields. Waste Manag. 2019, 96, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Zhang, L.; Loh, K.-C.; Kuroki, A.; Dai, Y.; Tong, Y.W. Microbial Biodiesel Production from Industrial Organic Wastes by Oleaginous Microorganisms: Current Status and Prospects. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 402, 123543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Andersen, S.J.; Candry, P.; Basadre, T.; Khor, W.C.; Roume, H.; Hernandez-Sanabria, E.; Coma, M.; Rabaey, K. Electrolytic Extraction Drives Volatile Fatty Acid Chain Elongation through Lactic Acid and Replaces Chemical pH Control in Thin Stillage Fermentation. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2015, 8, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Weimer, P.J.; Nerdahl, M.; Brandl, D.J. Production of Medium-Chain Volatile Fatty Acids by Mixed Ruminal Microorganisms Is Enhanced by Ethanol in Co-Culture with Clostridium Kluyveri. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 175, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bayané, A.; Guiot, S.R. Animal Digestive Strategies versus Anaerobic Digestion Bioprocesses for Biogas Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 43–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Noel, S.J.; Attwood, G.T.; Rakonjac, J.; Moon, C.D.; Waghorn, G.C.; Janssen, P.H. Seasonal Changes in the Digesta-Adherent Rumen Bacterial Communities of Dairy Cattle Grazing Pasture. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wei, S. The Application of Biotechnology on the Enhancing of Biogas Production from Lignocellulosic Waste. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 9821–9836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nerdahl, M.A.; Weimer, P.J. Redox Mediators Modify End Product Distribution in Biomass Fermentations by Mixed Ruminal Microbes In Vitro. AMB Expr. 2015, 5, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cavalcante, W.d.A.; Leitão, R.C.; Gehring, T.A.; Angenent, L.T.; Santaella, S.T. Anaerobic Fermentation for N-Caproic Acid Production: A Review. Process Biochem. 2017, 54, 106–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shi, X.; Wu, L.; Wei, W.; Ni, B.-J. Insights into the Microbiomes for Medium-Chain Carboxylic Acids Production from Biowastes through Chain Elongation. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 52, 3787–3812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Spirito, C.M.; Richter, H.; Rabaey, K.; Stams, A.J.; Angenent, L.T. Chain Elongation in Anaerobic Reactor Microbiomes to Recover Resources from Waste. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 27, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ma, H.; Yu, Z.; Wu, W.; Fu, P.; Xia, C.; Shiung Lam, S.; Boer Emilia, D.; Wang, Q.; Gao, M. Effects of Ethanol Addition on Caproic Acid Production and Rumen Microorganism Community Structure from Straw Fermentation. Fuel 2022, 327, 125142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lin, M.; Dai, X.; Weimer, P.J. Shifts in Fermentation End Products and Bacterial Community Composition in Long-Term, Sequentially Transferred in Vitro Ruminal Enrichment Cultures Fed Switchgrass with and without Ethanol as a Co-Substrate. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 285, 121324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lin, M.; Feng, L.; Cheng, Z.; Wang, K. Effect of Ethanol or Lactic Acid on Volatile Fatty Acid Profile and Microbial Community in Short-Term Sequentially Transfers by Ruminal Fermented with Wheat Straw In Vitro. Process Biochem. 2021, 102, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Menke, K.H.; Raab, L.; Salewski, A.; Steingass, H.; Fritz, D.; Schneider, W. The Estimation of the Digestibility and Metabolizable Energy Content of Ruminant Feedingstuffs from the Gas Production When They Are Incubated with Rumen Liquor In Vitro. J. Agric. Sci. 1979, 93, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lin, M.; Schaefer, D.M.; Zhao, G.Q.; Meng, Q.X. Effects of Nitrate Adaptation by Rumen Inocula Donors and Substrate Fiber Proportion on In Vitro Nitrate Disappearance, Methanogenesis, and Rumen Fermentation Acid. Animal 2013, 7, 1099–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cheng, Z.; Meng, Z.; Tan, D.; Datsomor, O.; Zhan, K.; Lin, M.; Zhao, G. Effects of Supplementation of Sodium Acetate on Rumen Fermentation and Microbiota in Postpartum Dairy Cows. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1053503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xie, J.; Chen, Y.; Cai, G.; Cai, R.; Hu, Z.; Wang, H. Tree Visualization by One Table (tvBOT): A Web Application for Visualizing, Modifying and Annotating Phylogenetic Trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W587–W592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chen, W.-S.; Strik, D.P.B.T.B.; Buisman, C.J.N.; Kroeze, C. Production of Caproic Acid from Mixed Organic Waste: An Environmental Life Cycle Perspective. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 7159–7168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wu, Q.; Bao, X.; Guo, W.; Wang, B.; Li, Y.; Luo, H.; Wang, H.; Ren, N. Medium Chain Carboxylic Acids Production from Waste Biomass: Current Advances and Perspectives. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 599–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cheng, S.; Liu, Z.; Varrone, C.; Zhou, A.; He, Z.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Liu, W.; Yue, X. Elucidating the Microbial Ecological Mechanisms on the Electro-Fermentation of Caproate Production from Acetate via Ethanol-Driven Chain Elongation. Environ. Res. 2022, 203, 111875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Suo, M.; Liu, L.; Fan, H.; Li, N.; Pan, H.; Hrynsphan, D.; Tatsiana, S.; Robles-Iglesias, R.; Wang, Z.; Chen, J. Advancements in Chain Elongation Technology: Transforming Lactic Acid into Caproic Acid for Sustainable Biochemical Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2025, 425, 132312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhao, J.; Ma, H.; Gao, M.; Qian, D.; Wang, Q.; Liu, L. Production of Caproate from Lactate by Chain Elongation under Electro-Fermentation: Dual Role of Exogenous Ethanol Electron Donor. Bioresour. Technol. 2025, 424, 132272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Liu, W.; Cheng, Z.; Zong, Y.; Shen, Y.; Jama, S.M.; Lin, M. Enrichment of Rumen Solid-Phase Bacteria for Production of Volatile Fatty Acids by Long-Term Subculturing In Vitro. Fermentation 2025, 11, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mickdam, E.; Khiaosa-ard, R.; Metzler-Zebeli, B.U.; Klevenhusen, F.; Chizzola, R.; Zebeli, Q. Rumen Microbial Abundance and Fermentation Profile during Severe Subacute Ruminal Acidosis and Its Modulation by Plant Derived Alkaloids In Vitro. Anaerobe 2016, 39, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jia, M.; Zhu, S.; Xue, M.-Y.; Chen, H.; Xu, J.; Song, M.; Tang, Y.; Liu, X.; Tao, Y.; Zhang, T.; et al. Single-Cell Transcriptomics across 2,534 Microbial Species Reveals Functional Heterogeneity in the Rumen Microbiome. Nat. Microbiol. 2024, 9, 1884–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mizrahi, I.; Wallace, R.J.; Moraïs, S. The Rumen Microbiome: Balancing Food Security and Environmental Impacts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 553–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hazarika, S.N.; Thakur, D. Actinobacteria. In Beneficial Microbes in Agro-Ecology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 443–476. ISBN 978-0-12-823414-3. [Google Scholar]
  37. Li, J.; Rui, J.; Pei, Z.; Sun, X.; Zhang, S.; Yan, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Zheng, T.; Li, X. Straw- and Slurry-Associated Prokaryotic Communities Differ during Co-Fermentation of Straw and Swine Manure. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 4771–4780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chwialkowska, J.; Duber, A.; Zagrodnik, R.; Walkiewicz, F.; Łężyk, M.; Oleskowicz-Popiel, P. Caproic Acid Production from Acid Whey via Open Culture Fermentation—Evaluation of the Role of Electron Donors and Downstream Processing. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 279, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mandra Harahap, B.; Ahring, B.K. Caproic Acid Production from Short-Chained Carboxylic Acids Produced by Arrested Anaerobic Digestion of Green Waste: Development and Optimization of a Mixed Caproic Acid Producing Culture. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 414, 131573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhang, C.; Liu, H.; Wu, P.; Li, J.; Zhang, J. Clostridium Kluyveri Enhances Caproate Production by Synergistically Cooperating with Acetogens in Mixed Microbial Community of Electro-Fermentation System. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 369, 128436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sekiguchi, Y. Syntrophococcus. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria; Whitman, W.B., Ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 1–5. ISBN 978-1-118-96060-8. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Effect of ethanol supplementation and continuous passages on (A) pH and (B) gas production of maize straw fermented with ruminal fluid in vitro (CON: control; ETH: with 200 mM of ethanol) (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 1. Effect of ethanol supplementation and continuous passages on (A) pH and (B) gas production of maize straw fermented with ruminal fluid in vitro (CON: control; ETH: with 200 mM of ethanol) (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Fermentation 11 00413 g001
Figure 2. Effect of ethanol supplementation and passages on (AF) SCFAs, (G) total alkyl and (H) average chain length of maize straw fermented with ruminal fluid in vitro (CON: control; ETH: with 200 mM of ethanol; 1st: first generation; 8th: eighth generation) (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 2. Effect of ethanol supplementation and passages on (AF) SCFAs, (G) total alkyl and (H) average chain length of maize straw fermented with ruminal fluid in vitro (CON: control; ETH: with 200 mM of ethanol; 1st: first generation; 8th: eighth generation) (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001).
Fermentation 11 00413 g002
Figure 3. Relative abundance of bacterial (A) phylum level and (B) genus level species community, and fungi (C) phylum level and (D) genus level species community.
Figure 3. Relative abundance of bacterial (A) phylum level and (B) genus level species community, and fungi (C) phylum level and (D) genus level species community.
Fermentation 11 00413 g003
Figure 4. Effect of ethanol addition on (A) PCoA, (B) SIMPER analysis, (C) LDA score, and (D) linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe ) for bacteria and (E) PCoA, (F) SIMPER analysis, (G) LDA score, and (H) LEfSe for fungi in vitro fermented maize straw (8th generation).
Figure 4. Effect of ethanol addition on (A) PCoA, (B) SIMPER analysis, (C) LDA score, and (D) linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe ) for bacteria and (E) PCoA, (F) SIMPER analysis, (G) LDA score, and (H) LEfSe for fungi in vitro fermented maize straw (8th generation).
Fermentation 11 00413 g004
Figure 5. Redundancy analysis of the correlation between microbial community and environmental factors: (A) bacterial CCA; (B) fungal CCA; (C) bacterial spearman; (D) fungal spearman (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 5. Redundancy analysis of the correlation between microbial community and environmental factors: (A) bacterial CCA; (B) fungal CCA; (C) bacterial spearman; (D) fungal spearman (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Fermentation 11 00413 g005
Table 1. Effect of ethanol supplementation on the alpha diversity and species richness of microorganisms in vitro fermented maize straw.
Table 1. Effect of ethanol supplementation on the alpha diversity and species richness of microorganisms in vitro fermented maize straw.
ItemsTreatmentsp-Value
CONETH
Bacterial 1
Ace320.79 ± 7.17242.43 ± 8.17<0.001
Chao1322.50 ± 7.94249.25 ± 18.110.004
Shannon5.49 ± 0.084.57 ± 0.08<0.001
Simpson0.9564 ± 0.0030.9141 ± 0.007<0.001
Fungi 2
Ace986.72 ± 42.641111.47 ± 47.040.081
Chao1986.28 ± 42.301121.72 ± 52.290.072
Shannon6.60 ± 0.127.13 ± 0.190.035
Simpson0.9686 ± 0.0030.9739 ± 0.0040.314
1 Each value represents the mean ± SE of 6 replicates (n = 6); 2 In the ETH group, fungal data are presented as the mean ± standard error (SE) of 5 replicates (n = 5).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, Z.; Meng, Z.; Shen, Y.; Liu, W.; Liu, L.; Zhao, G.; Wang, L.; Lin, M. Adding Ethanol to the Batch and Continuous Transplantation Co-Culture of Maize Straw Fermented by Rumen Fluid for the Production of Caproic Acid. Fermentation 2025, 11, 413. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11070413

AMA Style

Cheng Z, Meng Z, Shen Y, Liu W, Liu L, Zhao G, Wang L, Lin M. Adding Ethanol to the Batch and Continuous Transplantation Co-Culture of Maize Straw Fermented by Rumen Fluid for the Production of Caproic Acid. Fermentation. 2025; 11(7):413. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11070413

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, Zhiqiang, Zitong Meng, Yue Shen, Wengboyang Liu, Li Liu, Guoqi Zhao, Lin Wang, and Miao Lin. 2025. "Adding Ethanol to the Batch and Continuous Transplantation Co-Culture of Maize Straw Fermented by Rumen Fluid for the Production of Caproic Acid" Fermentation 11, no. 7: 413. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11070413

APA Style

Cheng, Z., Meng, Z., Shen, Y., Liu, W., Liu, L., Zhao, G., Wang, L., & Lin, M. (2025). Adding Ethanol to the Batch and Continuous Transplantation Co-Culture of Maize Straw Fermented by Rumen Fluid for the Production of Caproic Acid. Fermentation, 11(7), 413. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11070413

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop