In Vitro Characterization of Veillonella atypica ATCC 17744 Regarding Its Functional Properties
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Microorganism: Activation and Inoculum Preparation
2.2. Performance of Veillonella atypica ATCC 17744 in BHIL Medium
2.3. In Vitro Functional Properties Characterization of Veillonella atypica ATCC 17744
2.3.1. Stress Tolerance: pH Resistance, Bile Salt Tolerance, and Gastrointestinal Tract Survival
2.3.2. Adhesion Capacity: Hydrophobicity, Auto-Aggregation, and Biofilm Formation
- OD600 ≤ OD600: No biofilm formation capacity;
- OD600 ≤ 2 × OD600: Weak biofilm formation capacity;
- 2 × OD600 < OD ≤ 4 × OD600: Moderate biofilm formation capacity;
- OD600 > 4 × OD600: Strong biofilm formation capacity.
2.3.3. Anti-Pathogenic Activity
2.3.4. Functional Characteristics—Antioxidant Activity
2.3.5. Safety Characterization: Antibiotic Resistance; Gelatinase, Lipase, and Catalase Synthesis; and Hemolytic Activity
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Veillonella atypica ATCC 17744 Performance in BHIL Medium
3.2. Functional Properties Evaluation of Veillonella atypica ATCC 17744 “In Vitro”
3.2.1. Stress Tolerance: pH Resistance, Bile Salt Tolerance, and Gastrointestinal Tract Survival
3.2.2. Adhesion Capacity: Hydrophobicity, Auto-Aggregation, and Biofilm Formation
3.2.3. Anti-Pathogenic Activity
3.2.4. Functional Characteristics—Antioxidant Activity
3.2.5. Safety Properties: Antibiotic Resistance; Gelatinase, Lipase, and Catalase Synthesis; and Hemolytic Activity
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Marco, M.L.; Sanders, M.E.; Gänzle, M.; Arrieta, M.C.; Cotter, P.D.; De Vuyst, L.; Hill, C.; Holzapfel, W.; Lebeer, S.; Merenstein, D.; et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) Consensus Statement on Fermented Foods. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 18, 196–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barton, W.; Penney, N.C.; Cronin, O.; Garcia-Perez, I.; Molloy, M.G.; Holmes, E.; Shanahan, F.; Cotter, P.D.; O’Sullivan, O.; Claesson, M.J.; et al. The microbiome of professional athletes differs from that of more sedentary subjects in composition and particularly at the functional metabolic level. Gut 2018, 67, 625–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scheiman, J.; Luber, J.M.; Chavkin, T.A.; MacDonald, T.; Tung, A.; Pham, L.D.; Wibowo, M.C.; Wurth, R.C.; Punthambaker, S.; Tierney, B.T.; et al. Meta-omics analysis of elite athletes identifies a performance-enhancing microbe that functions via lactate metabolism. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1104–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, L.; Zhang, R.; Li, L. Effects of Probiotic Supplementation on Exercise and the Underlying Mechanisms. Foods 2023, 12, 1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marttinen, M.; Ala-Jaakkola, R.; Laitila, A.; Lehtinen, M.J. Gut Microbiota, Probiotics and Physical Performance in Athletes and Physically Active Individuals. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolfe, R.S.; Metcalf, W.W. A vacuum vortex technique for preparation of anoxic solutions or liquid culture media in small volumes for cultivating methanogens or other strict anaerobes. Anaerobe 2010, 16, 216–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Oliveira Coelho, B.; Fiorda-Mello, F.; De Melo Pereira, G.V.; Thomaz-Soccol, V.; Rakshit, S.K.; De Carvalho, J.C.; Soccol, C.R. In vitro probiotic properties and DNA protection activity of yeast and lactic acid bacteria isolated from a honey-based kefir beverage. Foods 2019, 8, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vitola, H.R.S.; Dannenberg, G.D.S.; Marques, J.L.; Fiorentini, Â.M. Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus casei CSL3 isolated from bovine colostrum silage and its viability capacity immobilized in soybean. Process Biochem. 2018, 75, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kos, B.; Šušković, J.; Vuković, S.; Simpraga, B.; Banović, M.; Pavunc, A.L.; Džidara, P.; Matosić, S.; Jaki, M.; Maurac, I. Adhesion and aggregation ability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 94, 981–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hooshdar, P.; Kermanshahi, R.K.; Ghadam, P.; Khosravi-Darani, K. A Review on Production of Exopolysaccharide andBiofilm in Probiotics like Lactobacilli and Methods of Analysis. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2020, 10, 6058–6075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tagg, J.R.; McGiven, A.R. Assay system for bacteriocins. Appl. Microbiol. 1971, 21, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bian, J.; Peng, F.; Peng, X.P.; Peng, P.; Xu, F.; Sun, R.C. Structural features and antioxidant activity of xylooligosaccharides enzymatically produced from sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 127, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zulkiply, N.A.; Santha, S.; Zulperi, D.; Noor Azmai, M.A.; Yusof, M.T.; Zamri Saad, M. Antibiotic susceptibility and resistance profiles of Vibrio spp. isolated from cultured grouper using disk diffusion method conforming to CLSI guidelines. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, G.S.; Mangels, J.I. Gelatinase production: Incubation techniques for anaerobic bacteriology specimens. In Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook; Leber, A.L., Ed.; American Society for Microbiology: Washington, DC, USA, 2023; Chapter 4.6.13. [Google Scholar]
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 34th ed.; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2024; CLSI Document M100. [Google Scholar]
- Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2002; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Feltrin, V.P.; Sant’Anna, E.S.; Porto, A.C.S.; Torres, R.C.O. Produção de Lactobacillus plantarum em melaço de cana-de-açúcar. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2000, 43, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, Y.; Yu, X.; Zhao, X.; Liu, C.; Li, T.; Mu, S.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Song, Z.; et al. Fermentation Characteristics and Postacidification of Yogurt by Streptococcus thermophilus CICC 6038 and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus CICC 6047 at Optimal Inoculum Ratio. J. Dairy Sci. 2024, 107, 123–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Begley, M.; Gahan, C.G.M.; Hill, C. The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29, 625–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marcia, J.; Aleman, R.S.; Montero-Fernández, I.; Martín-Vertedor, D.; Manrique-Fernández, V.; Moncada, M.; Kayanush, A. Attributes of Lactobacillus acidophilus as Effected by Carao (Cassia grandis) Pulp Powder. Fermentation 2023, 9, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zółkiewicz, J.; Marzec, A.; Ruszczyński, M.; Feleszko, W. Postbiotics—A Step Beyond Pre- and Probiotics. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campos, J.V.F.; Silva, M.O.; Vieira, A.C.A.; Faria, L.M.; Valente, G.L.C. In Vitro Evaluation of the Probiotic Potential of Microorganisms Isolated from Functional Commercial Fermented Milks. Agrar. Sci. J. 2021, 13, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Han, F.; Cong, L.; Sun, T.; Menghe, B.; Liu, W. Evaluation of Tolerance to Artificial Gastroenteric Juice and Fermentation Characteristics of Lactobacillus Strains Isolated from Human. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 10, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathara, J.M.; Schillinger, U.; Kutima, P.M.; Mbugua, S.K.; Guigas, C.; Franz, C.; Holzapfel, W.H. Functional Properties of Lactobacillus plantarum Strains Isolated from Maasai Traditional Fermented Milk Products in Kenya. Curr. Microbiol. 2008, 56, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vinderola, G.C.; Reinheimer, J.A. Lactic Acid Starter and Probiotic Bacteria: A Comparative “In Vitro” Study of Probiotic Characteristics and Biological Barrier Resistance. Food Res. Int. 2003, 36, 885–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pelletier, C.; Bouley, C.; Cayuela, C.; Bouttier, S.; Bourlioux, P.; Bellon-Fontaine, M.N. Cell Surface Characteristics of Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei, Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus Strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 1725–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Todorov, S.D.; Furtado, D.N.; Saad, S.M.I.; Tome, E.; Franco, B.D.G.M. Potential Beneficial Properties of Bacteriocin-Producing Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Smoked Salmon. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 110, 971–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nader-Macías, M.E.F.; Otero, M.C.; Espeche, M.C.; Maldonado, N.C. Advances in the Design of Probiotic Products for the Prevention of Major Diseases in Dairy Cattle. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 35, 1387–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Du, Y.; Li, H.; Shao, J.; Wu, T.; Xu, W.; Hu, X.; Chen, J. Adhesion and Colonization of the Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum HC-2 in the Intestine of Litopenaeus vannamei Are Associated with Bacterial Surface Proteins. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 878874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhakephalkar, T.; Pisu, V.; Margale, P.; Chandras, S.; Shetty, D.; Wagh, S.; Dagar, S.S.; Kapse, N.; Dhakephalkar, P.K. Strain-Dependent Adhesion Variations of Shouchella clausii Isolated from Healthy Human Volunteers: A Study on Cell Surface Properties and Potential Probiotic Benefits. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Newaj-Fyzul, A.; Al-Harbi, A.H.; Austin, B. Developments in the Use of Probiotics for Disease Control in Aquaculture. Aquaculture 2014, 431, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krausova, G.; Hyrslova, I.; Hynstova, I. In Vitro Evaluation of Adhesion Capacity, Hydrophobicity, and Auto Aggregation of Newly Isolated Potential Probiotic Strains. Fermentation 2019, 5, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Rodríguez, I.; Ruiz, L.; Gueimonde, M.; Margolles, A.; Sánchez, B. Factors Involved in the Colonization and Survival of Bifidobacteria in the Gastrointestinal Tract. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2013, 340, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, B.R.; Hymes, J.; Sanozky-Dawes, R.; Henriksen, E.D.; Barrangou, R.; Klaenhammer, T.R. Conserved S-Layer-Associated Proteins Revealed by Exoproteomic Survey of S-Layer-Forming Lactobacilli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bentahar, M.C.; Benabdelmoumene, D.; Robert, V.; Dahmouni, S.; Qadi, W.S.M.; Bengharbi, Z.; Langella, P.; Benbouziane, B.; Al-Olayan, E.; Dawoud, E.A.D.; et al. Evaluation of Probiotic Potential and Functional Properties of Lactobacillus Strains Isolated from Dhan, Traditional Algerian Goat Milk Butter. Foods 2024, 13, 3781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motta, J.P.; Wallace, J.L.; Buret, A.G. Gastrointestinal Biofilms in Health and Disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 18, 314–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tomé, A.R.; Carvalho, F.M.; Teixeira-Santos, R.; Burmølle, M.; Mergulhão, F.J.M.; Gomes, L.C. Use of Probiotics to Control Biofilm Formation in Food Industries. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pugazhendhi, A.S.; Wei, F.; Hughes, M.; Coathup, M. Bacterial Adhesion, Virulence, and Biofilm Formation. In Musculoskeletal Infection; Coathup, M., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 19–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terraf, M.C.L.; Juárez Tomás, M.S.; Nader-Macías, M.E.F.; Silva, C. Screening of Biofilm Formation by Beneficial Vaginal Lactobacilli and Influence of Culture Media Components. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 113, 1517–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alotaibi, G.F.; Bukhari, M.A. Factors Influencing Bacterial Biofilm Formation and Development. Am. J. Biomed. Sci. Res. 2021, 12, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plaza-Diaz, J.; Ruiz-Ojeda, F.J.; Gil-Campos, M.; Gil, A. Mechanisms of Action of Probiotics. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, S49–S66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, J.; Jo, J.; Wan, J.; Seo, H.; Han, S.-W.; Shin, Y.-J.; Kim, D.-H. In Vitro Evaluation of Probiotic Properties and Anti-Pathogenic Effects of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Strains as Potential Probiotics. Foods 2024, 13, 2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiktorczyk Kapischke, N.; Grudlewska Buda, K.; Budzyńska, A.; Chomacka Gollus, K.; Gospodarek Komkowska, E.; Skowron, K. Antimicrobial action of Lactobacillus spp. isolated from yoghurt against Escherichia coli, Salmonella enteritidis and Listeria monocytogenes: A pilot study. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrade, C.R.G.; Souza, M.R.; Penna, C.F.A.M.; Acurcio, L.B.; Sant’Anna, F.M.; Castro, R.D.; Oliveira, D.L.S. In Vitro Probiotic Properties of Lactobacillus spp. Isolated from Minas Artisanal Cheese from Serra da Canastra—MG. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2014, 66, 1592–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Santos-Sánchez, N.F.; Salas-Coronado, R.; Villanueva-Cañongo, C.; Hernández-Carlos, B. Antioxidant Compounds and Their Antioxidant Mechanism. In Antioxidants; Shalaby, E., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; pp. 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, D.; Boxin, O.U.; Prior, R.L. The Chemistry Behind Antioxidant Capacity Assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1841–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Begunova, A.V.; Savinova, O.S.; Glazunova, O.A.; Moiseenko, K.V.; Rozhkova, I.V.; Fedorova, T.V. Development of Antioxidant and Antihypertensive Properties during Growth of Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus reuteri on Cow’s Milk: Fermentation and Peptidomics Study. Foods 2020, 10, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fatahi Bafghi, M.; Naseri, S.; Alizehi, A. Genome analysis of probiotic bacteria for antibiotic resistance genes. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2022, 115, 375–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gueimonde, M.; Sánchez, B.; de los Reyes-Gavilán, C.G.; Margolles, A. Antibiotic resistance in probiotic bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fisher, K.; Phillips, C. The Ecology, Epidemiology and Virulence of Enterococcus. Microbiology 2009, 155, 1749–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, W.; Khosasih, V.; Suwanto, A.; Kim, H.K. Characterization of Lipases from Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis Isolated from Human Facial Sebaceous Skin. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 22, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín, R.; Suárez, J.E. Biosynthesis and Degradation of H2O2 by Vaginal Lactobacilli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 400–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atassi, F.; Servin, A.L. Individual and Cooperative Roles of Lactic Acid and Hydrogen Peroxide in the Killing Activity of Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC933 and Lactobacillus gasseri KS120.1 against Enteric, Uropathogenic and Vaginosis-Associated Pathogens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010, 304, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delbes-Paus, C.; Dorchies, G.; Chaabna, Z.; Callon, C.; Montel, M.C. Contribution of Hydrogen Peroxide to the Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus by Lactococcus garvieae in Interaction with Raw Milk Microbial Community. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 924–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vesterlund, S.; Vankerckhoven, V.; Saxelin, M.; Goossens, H.; Salminen, S.; Ouwehand, A.C. Safety Assessment of Lactobacillus Strains: Presence of Putative Risk Factors in Faecal, Blood and Probiotic Isolates. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 116, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]



| Absorbance (600 nm) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Time | Blank | Samples |
| 24 h | 0.07903 | 0.0791 |
| 48 h | 0.07903 | 0.11171 |
| Antibiotic | Average Inhibition Zone (mm) |
|---|---|
| Ceftiofur | 39.5 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 25.5 |
| Ceftriaxone | 37.0 |
| Enrofloxacin | 27.0 |
| Amoxicillin | 22.5 |
| Ampicillin | 22.5 |
| Gentamicin | 21.5 |
| Tetracycline | 30.0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Fernandes, J.C.; Bordini, F.W.; Chandel, A.K.; de Mancilha, I.M. In Vitro Characterization of Veillonella atypica ATCC 17744 Regarding Its Functional Properties. Fermentation 2025, 11, 612. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11110612
Fernandes JC, Bordini FW, Chandel AK, de Mancilha IM. In Vitro Characterization of Veillonella atypica ATCC 17744 Regarding Its Functional Properties. Fermentation. 2025; 11(11):612. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11110612
Chicago/Turabian StyleFernandes, Julia Cristina, Fernanda Weber Bordini, Anuj Kumar Chandel, and Ismael Maciel de Mancilha. 2025. "In Vitro Characterization of Veillonella atypica ATCC 17744 Regarding Its Functional Properties" Fermentation 11, no. 11: 612. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11110612
APA StyleFernandes, J. C., Bordini, F. W., Chandel, A. K., & de Mancilha, I. M. (2025). In Vitro Characterization of Veillonella atypica ATCC 17744 Regarding Its Functional Properties. Fermentation, 11(11), 612. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11110612

