Next Article in Journal
Integrated Pretreatment and Microbial Matching for PHA Production from Lignocellulosic Agro-Forestry Residues
Previous Article in Journal
Valorization of Oat Husk for the Production of Fermentable Sugars, Xylooligosaccharides, and Inulinase via Deep Eutectic Solvent and Microwave-Assisted Pretreatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Quorum Sensing in Enhancing Lovastatin and Pigment Production in Monascus purpureus C322
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bioemulsifier Produced by Aspergillus niger UCP 1064 Isolated from Caatinga Soil as a Promising Molecule for Scaled-Up Pharmaceutical Applications

by
Uiara Maria de Barros Lira Lins
1,
Rosileide Fontenele da Silva Andrade
2 and
Galba Maria de Campos-Takaki
2,*
1
Northeast Biotechnology Network (RENORBIO), Federal Rural University of Pernambuco (UFRPE), Recife 52171-900, Brazil
2
Multi-User Center for Analysis and Characterization in Biomolecules and Material Surface (CEMACBIOS), Catholic University of Pernambuco, Recife 50050-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2025, 11(10), 562; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11100562
Submission received: 1 June 2025 / Revised: 14 August 2025 / Accepted: 26 August 2025 / Published: 29 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Scale-Up Challenges in Microbial Fermentation)

Abstract

This study presents the production, characterization, and potential pharmaceutical application of a bioemulsifier synthesized by Aspergillus niger UCP 1064 by submerged fermentation using agro-industrial residues (cassava wastewater and soluble starch). The compound exhibited a high emulsification index (EI24 > 88%) against hydrophobic substrates, effectively reduced surface tension, and remained stable across a wide range of pH (2–12), temperatures (5–100 °C), and salinity levels (0–20% NaCl). Microscopic analysis confirmed the formation of stable oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions, while biochemical tests identified the compound as a glycolipoprotein. Rheological assays demonstrated a significant reduction in oil viscosity, enhancing fluidity. Through factorial design and response surface methodology, production conditions were optimized, achieving yields of up to 3.18 g/L. A theoretical scale-up indicated technical feasibility for pharmaceutical applications; however, challenges such as process reproducibility, sterility, and regulatory compliance persist. These findings highlight the bioemulsifier’s potential as a sustainable and biocompatible alternative for drug delivery systems.

1. Introduction

The growing demand for sustainable and environmentally friendly emulsifying agents has driven the development of bioemulsifiers produced by microorganisms [1,2]. Unlike synthetic surfactants, bioemulsifiers are biosynthesized molecules that typically exhibit lower toxicity, higher biodegradability, and, in some cases, stability under challenging conditions such as variations in pH, temperature, and salinity. Among microbial producers, filamentous fungi such as Aspergillus niger have stood out due to their ability to grow on low-cost substrates and to produce metabolites of biotechnological interest [3,4].
Aspergillus niger is a promising species known for its capacity to produce bioemulsifier with high emulsification index and potential applicability in various fields, including environmental remediation, cosmetics, food, and especially controlled drug delivery systems. The production of these compounds via submerged fermentation using agro-industrial residues as carbon sources not only reduces production costs but also contributes to waste valorization, thus supporting a circular economy [5,6].
However, it is important to note that some strains of Aspergillus niger are known to produce mycotoxins, such as ochratoxin A and fumonisins, under certain culture conditions. These secondary metabolites pose significant toxicological risks and are strictly regulated in the food and pharmaceutical industries. Therefore, strain selection, purification strategies, and toxicological screening are critical when considering the use of Aspergillus-derived compounds in edible or therapeutic products. This underscores the need for rigorous safety assessments to ensure the absence of harmful metabolites in the final product [7,8].
Despite progress in small-scale production, transitioning to industrial-scale processes remains a significant challenge. Reproducibility of production parameters, compound stability in pharmaceutical formulations, and regulatory compliance require a systematic approach to enable the successful application of bioemulsifiers in drug delivery systems [9,10].
In recent years, microbial bioemulsifiers have gained increasing attention as excipients in pharmaceutical formulations, particularly in controlled drug delivery systems such as nanoemulsions, liposomes, and micellar carriers [1,3,11]. These applications demand critical attributes, including low cytotoxicity, biocompatibility, physicochemical stability under physiological conditions, and the ability to form stable oil-in-water emulsions with reduced droplet size and controlled viscosity [10,12]. Glycolipoprotein-type bioemulsifiers have demonstrated the ability to enable sustained drug release and enhance the bioavailability of hydrophobic compounds, highlighting their multifunctional potential [13,14]. Although the present study does not include biological assays or formulation testing, the physicochemical profile of the bioemulsifier produced by Aspergillus niger UCP 1064 supports its potential use in pharmaceutical delivery systems, warranting further experimental investigation [15,16].
The aim of this study was to produce and characterize an efficient bioemulsifier using Aspergillus niger UCP 1064 through submerged fermentation, assess its physicochemical stability, evaluate its cytotoxicity, and discuss the main challenges related to its application in pharmaceutical systems and scale-up processes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microorganisms

The filamentous fungus Aspergillus niger UCP 1064 was isolated from soil samples collected in the Caatinga biome and from the Igarassu River in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. This strain is part of the Culture Collection UCP (Universidade Católica de Pernambuco) of the Multi-User Center for Analysis and Characterization in Biomolecules and Material Surface (CEMACBIOS), Catholic University of Pernambuco and is registered with the World Federation for Culture Collections (WFCC).

2.2. Agro-Industrial Residues

Cassava wastewater was used as the agro-industrial residue for bioemulsifier production. The residue was obtained from a cassava processing industry located in Cabo de Santo Agostinho (PE), Brazil.

2.3. Alternative Substrate (Soluble Starch)

A commercial corn-derived soluble starch was purchased from a local supplier in Recife (PE), Brazil.

2.4. Production of Bioemulsifier

Aspergillus niger was cultured on Petri dishes containing Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, purity 98%) and incubated at 28°C for 7 days until sporulation occurred. To prepare the inoculum, young spores were collected and suspended in sterile water to achieve a final concentration of 108 spores/mL. Ten percent of this spore suspension was used to inoculate the production medium.
Bioemulsifier production was conducted in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL of synthetic medium (control), composed of a salt base and glucose (45 g/L) and monosodium glutamate (15 g/L) as described by Gupta et al. [17] with modifications. The final composition was as follows: KH2PO4 (4.0 g/L, Êxodo, São Paulo, Brazil, 98% purity), K2HPO4 (5.0 g/L, Sigma-Aldrich, 98% purity), FeSO4·7H2O (0.2 g/L, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany, 98% purity), MnSO4·4H2O (0.1 g/L, Sigma-Aldrich, 98% purity), MgSO4·7H2O (0.1 g/L, Merck, 98% purity), ZnSO4·7H2O (0.2 g/L, Sigma-Aldrich, 99% purity), CaCl2·2H2O (20 mg/L, Sigma-Aldrich, 99% purity), and (NH4)2SO4 (5.0 mg/L, Sigma-Aldrich, 99% purity).
To identify the inducing source for bioemulsifier production, the carbon (glucose) and nitrogen (monosodium glutamate) sources in the control medium were replaced with renewable agro-industrial residues, specifically cassava wastewater and soluble starch. This new formulation was referred to as the modified medium (cassava wastewater + soluble starch) (Table 1). In all formulations, the saline base was maintained. pH was adjusted to 6.5, and the flasks were incubated at 28 °C under orbital shaking at 180 rpm for 7 days.

2.5. Surface Tension Measurement

Following cultivation, the surface tension of the cell-free metabolic liquids was measured using the Du Noüy ring method with an automatic tensiometer (Sigma 70 model, KSV Ltd., Helsinki, Finland). All measurements were performed in triplicate according to the protocol described by Kuyukina et al. [18].

2.6. Emulsification Index Determination

The emulsification capacity was assessed using the emulsification index (EI) after 24 h, following the method of Cooper and Goldenberg [19]. Hydrophobic substrates used included motor oil, used motor oil, canola oil, castor oil, sunflower oil, soybean oil, and corn oil, all mixed in a 1:1 ratio with the metabolic liquid. Measurements were performed in triplicate.

2.7. Emulsion Type Characterization

The type of emulsion formed was examined using a Zeiss Standard 20 bright-field optical microscope equipped with a digital camera (Oberkochen, Germany). After homogenization, an aliquot of the emulsion was carefully transferred onto a glass slide with a Pasteur pipette and observed at 10× magnification to evaluate the aggregation state and emulsion type.

2.8. Influence on Viscosity of Hydrophobic Compounds

The effect of the bioemulsifier produced by A. niger UCP 1064 on the viscosity of used motor oil and soybean oil was evaluated. A total of 6 mL of used motor oil was placed in a graduated tube, followed by the addition of 2 mL of cell-free metabolic liquid containing the bioemulsifier. Viscosity was measured at 25 °C using a Brookfield TC 500 viscometer (Middleboro, MA, USA) with spindle No. 42 at 50 rpm. Samples were vortexed for 1 min before analysis, and emulsions were evaluated rheologically as described by Diab et al. [20]. Results were expressed in centipoise (cP) and percentage (%).

2.9. Bioemulsifier Extraction and Quantification

The bioemulsifier was isolated from the cell-free metabolic liquid by precipitation with 70% ethanol (v/v) following the procedure described by Paraszkiewicz et al. [21]. The mixture was left to rest for 24 h at 4 °C, followed by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 15 min at 5 °C to collect the precipitate.
For quantification, the recovered precipitate was transferred to pre-weighed aluminum dishes and dried in a hot air oven at 60 °C until constant weight (24–48 h). The final dry weight was calculated by subtracting the weight of the empty dish from that of the dish containing the dried precipitate. All experiments were performed in triplicate. The concentration of the bioemulsifier was expressed as milligrams per milliliter (mg/mL) of the original metabolic liquid.

2.10. Determination of Ionic Charge and Functional Groups

The ionic charge was determined by zeta potential analysis using the Zeta-Meter System 3.0 with Direct Imaging technology (ZM3-DG, ZetaMeter, Inc., Harrisonburg, VA, USA). Functional groups present in the bioemulsifier were identified using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) on a Mattson 1000 FT-IR instrument (Milton Keynes, UK) within the spectral range of 500–4000 cm−1.

2.11. Determination of Biochemical Constituents

The biochemical composition of the biomolecules was determined by quantifying total protein, total carbohydrate, and total lipid contents. Protein concentration was assessed using a commercial kit from Diagnostic S.A. (Barueri, SP, Brazil), which employs the biuret reagent to detect peptide bonds. In the presence of peptides, copper (II) ions form mauve-colored coordination complexes in an alkaline solution. The alkaline reagent used was 0.2 mol·L−1 sodium hydroxide (NaOH), adjusted to a pH of approximately 11. Total protein concentration was calculated using the following equation:
T o t a l   P r o t e i n = (   S a m p l e   a b s o r b a n c e / S a n d a r d   A b s o r b a n c e )   ×   4   g / L
Total carbohydrate content was quantified using the phenol-sulfuric acid method described by Dubois et al. [22], with D-glucose as the standard. Total lipids were determined following the method proposed by Manocha et al. [23]. Lipids were extracted using chloroform:methanol mixtures in varying volume ratios (1:1, 1:2, and 2:1). The organic phases were pooled, evaporated under vacuum, and quantified gravimetrically.

2.12. Stability of Emulsifying Capacity

The stability of the bioemulsifier’s (BE) emulsifying activity was evaluated by measuring the emulsification index (EI) under various physicochemical conditions. Samples were exposed to a range of pH values (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12), temperatures (5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 100 °C), and NaCl concentrations (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20%). After treatment, the EI was measured to assess the stability and performance of the BE under these conditions.

2.13. Full-Factorial Design

A 22 full-factorial design was performed to evaluate the main effects and interaction between two variables: cassava wastewater and soluble starch, used as alternative carbon and energy sources for bioemulsifier production by Aspergillus niger UCP 1064.
Subsequently, a central composite design (CCD) with two factors, coupled with response surface methodology (RSM), was applied to model the effects of these variables on emulsifying activity and to explore the response surface.
All statistical analyses were conducted using Statistica® software, version 10.0 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA), with a significance level of p < 0.05.

2.14. Prospective Scale-Up Assessment of Bioemulsifier Production for Pharmaceutical Applications

A theoretical scale-up analysis was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of applying the bioemulsifier produced by Aspergillus niger UCP 1064 in drug delivery systems. This extrapolation was based on the yield obtained under optimized bench-scale conditions and projected to fermentation volumes of 5 L, 50 L, and 500 L.
All fermentation parameters were maintained constant, including the optimized medium (cassava wastewater and soluble starch), incubation at 28 °C, orbital agitation at 180 rpm, and a 7-day cultivation period. Input requirements such as substrates, mineral salts, water, and ethanol for product recovery were proportionally adjusted.
The assessment also accounted for pharmaceutical-scale requirements, including sterility, process reproducibility, pH and oxygen transfer control, and final product purity. This approach provided preliminary technical and operational insights to support the integration of the bioemulsifier into scalable drug delivery platforms.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Bioemulsifier Production Using Agro-Industrial Residues

The production of bioemulsifier by Aspergillus niger UCP 1064 using agro-industrial residues demonstrated both technical feasibility and biotechnological potential. The formulation containing 2.6% cassava wastewater and 4.5% soluble starch yielded 3.18 g/L of bioemulsifier after 7 days of submerged fermentation under orbital agitation at 180 rpm and 28 °C (Table 1).
This yield is notably higher than those typically reported in the literature for filamentous fungi under similar conditions, as described by Gupta et al. [17] and Devale et al. [4], underscoring the strain’s metabolic capacity to convert low-cost substrates into value-added products.
This approach is particularly relevant within the biorefinery context, as it utilizes regionally abundant by-products such as cassava wastewater, thereby reducing operational costs and promoting the valorization of agro-industrial residues [24,25].
The strategic use of these residues aligns with circular economy principles, supporting a sustainable approach with potential for industrial-scale applications [26,27]. Bioemulsifier production by Aspergillus niger, using 10% inoculum and agitation at 180 rpm, resulted in a surface tension of 54 mN/m, an emulsification index (EI24) of 96%, and a yield of 3.18 g/L. These results indicate high emulsifying efficiency when compared with recent literature. For instance, A. niger SA1 cultivated on waste cooking oil achieved a maximum yield of 8.02 g/L, EI24 of 65%, and surface tension reduction to ~35.8 mN/m after statistical optimization (200 rpm, 35 °C, pH 6) [28]. Although the yield obtained in this study is lower than the maximum reported, the emulsification index is markedly higher, suggesting enhanced emulsion stability under the tested operational conditions. The surface tension value, while higher, remains within the range considered effective for industrial and environmental applications.
Table 1. Emulsification index (EI24) of the bioemulsifier against different hydrophobic substrates.
Table 1. Emulsification index (EI24) of the bioemulsifier against different hydrophobic substrates.
Hydrophobic SubstrateEI24 (%)
Motor oil72.0 ± 1.5
Used motor oil88.3 ± 2.0
Soybean oil50.3 ± 1.2
Corn oil62.5 ± 1.7
Canola oil55.8 ± 1.3
Castor oil76.0 ± 1.1
Sunflower oil62.5 ± 1.2
Source: Authors (2025).

3.2. Emulsification Activity and Surface Tension

The emulsifying activity of the bioemulsifier produced by Aspergillus niger UCP 1064 varied depending on the hydrophobic substrate used (Table 1).
Among the oils evaluated, used motor oil exhibited the highest emulsification index after 24 h (EI24), with a value of 88.3 ± 2.0%, followed by castor oil (76.0 ± 1.1%) and fresh motor oil (72.0 ± 1.5%). In contrast, the lowest value was observed for soybean oil (50.3 ± 1.2%), although it still exceeded the 50% threshold established by Lima et al. [29] and Pele et al. [30] to characterize compounds with emulsifying potential.
These results suggest that the bioemulsifier has varying affinities for different oil phases, likely due to differences in the chemical composition of the oils, including viscosity, hydrocarbon chain length, and polarity. Similar findings were reported by Santos et al. [31], who observed higher emulsifying activity against used mineral oil than against vegetable oils. This suggests that complex industrial residues may serve as more suitable models for evaluating the performance of biosurfactants and bioemulsifiers.
Surface tension analysis of the cell-free supernatant further confirmed the compound’s surfactant activity, with values decreasing from 72 mN/m (distilled water) to below 54 mN/m in some formulations. According to Gupta et al. [17], effective biosurfactants typically reduce surface tension to values below 40 mN/m. Although this threshold was not reached in the present study, the notable reduction observed reinforces the biotechnological potential of the compound produced.
These findings are in line with those of Sundaram et al. [32], who demonstrated the effectiveness of agro-industrial residues such as whey and potato peels in biosurfactant production by filamentous fungi. Furthermore, the use of cassava wastewater as a carbon source supports the biorefinery concept, contributing to the valorization of abundant and potentially polluting regional by-products and promoting circular economy practices.
Overall, data confirm the potential of A. niger UCP 1064 to produce bioemulsifiers with high stability and efficiency, positioning it as a sustainable and economically viable alternative for industrial processes involving the emulsification of hydrophobic compounds.

3.3. Characterization of Emulsions Formed by the Bioemulsifier Produced by A. niger

The emulsions formed by the bioemulsifier produced by A. niger were analyzed using bright-field optical microscopy, focusing on the droplet aggregation state and the type of emulsion formed after using used motor oil as the hydrophobic substrate (Figure 1).
Optical microscopy confirmed the formation of stable oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions. The emulsified droplets showed a uniform distribution and low levels of coalescence, indicating adequate physical stability.
The emulsifying activity of the bioemulsifier produced by Aspergillus niger UCP 1064 proved to be highly effective in forming stable O/W emulsions, as evidenced by a notable emulsification index (EI24) of 88.3 ± 2.0% with used motor oil. This performance is comparable to that reported by Li et al. [33], who emphasized the influence of oil composition on emulsion stability. According to their findings, oils with shorter and more saturated fatty acid chains, such as corn oil, generally result in more stable emulsions due to their lower interfacial tension.
In addition, the stability of emulsions formed by the A. niger UCP 1064 bioemulsifier under different environmental conditions—including variations in pH and temperature—further supports its industrial application potential. Similar findings were reported by Barbosa et al. [2] who observed that bioemulsifiers produced by yeasts such as Candida subtilis maintained high emulsion stability even under extreme pH and salinity conditions. These observations suggest that the bioemulsifier evaluated in this study may serve as a viable and sustainable alternative to synthetic emulsifiers across various industrial sectors.
Therefore, the results confirm the efficacy of the bioemulsifier produced by A. niger UCP 1064 in forming stable emulsions, with promising applications in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and food industries—aligning with current trends toward sustainable, low-impact bioproducts.

3.4. Determination of Ionic Charge and Functional Groups

The bioemulsifier produced by A. niger exhibited a negative ionic charge, with a zeta potential of −28.7 mV and conductivity of 414.2 µS/cm at 25 °C, indicating an anionic profile. The biochemical composition revealed the presence of proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids, suggesting a glycolipoprotein nature (Table 2).
Although the biochemical profile indicates a glycolipoprotein nature due to the presence of proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids, further analyses are recommended to investigate the potential presence of low molecular weight metabolites, fermentation by-products, and secondary compounds, including mycotoxins. Some strains of Aspergillus niger, despite being generally recognized as safe (GRAS), may produce substances such as oxalic acid, gliotoxin, and fumonisins under specific cultivation conditions. Therefore, additional evaluations are essential to ensure the safety, purity, and regulatory compliance of the bioemulsifier for potential pharmaceutical applications, especially in drug delivery systems [15,34].
Functional group identification by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), as shown in Figure 2, revealed absorption bands in the 3400–3200 cm−1 range corresponding to O–H and N–H stretching vibrations, typically associated with hydroxyl groups from polysaccharides and amine groups from proteins. Bands between 2950 and 2850 cm−1 indicated C–H stretching vibrations from aliphatic –CH2 and –CH3 groups, confirming the presence of long hydrocarbon chains characteristic of lipids or fatty acids and supporting the amphiphilic nature of the molecule [32,35,36]. Additional bands in the 1000–1200 cm−1 range corresponded to C–O–C and C–O–P stretching vibrations, commonly found in oligosaccharides and polysaccharides. Peaks observed between 1300 and 1500 cm−1 were attributed to CH2 and =CH bending vibrations, typical of both lipids and proteins [37,38,39].
These FT-IR spectral features corroborate the biochemical composition, confirming the presence of proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids. Altogether, these results strongly support that the bioemulsifier produced by A. niger UCP 1064 is a glycolipoprotein structurally similar to other bioemulsifying molecules.
These findings are consistent with recent reports describing microbial bioemulsifiers as glycolipoprotein or glycoprotein complexes. For example, Ferreira et al. [38] described bioemulsifiers produced by Candida tropicalis strains with similar composition, emphasizing that the combination of proteins and carbohydrates enhances emulsifying capacity and emulsion stability. Likewise, Sankhyan et al. [13] demonstrated that the lipid fraction interacts with hydrophobic phases, while the protein and polysaccharide fractions confer colloidal stability and inhibit droplet coalescence.
The glycolipoprotein structure of the bioemulsifier produced by A. niger UCP 1064 provides both surfactant and stabilizing properties, which can be exploited in various industrial applications, particularly in the pharmaceutical and environmental sectors—aligning with current trends in the development of sustainable and multifunctional biosurfactants [32,40].

3.5. Bioemulsifier Stability Evaluated by Emulsification Index (EI24)

The stability of the bioemulsifier was assessed by monitoring variations in the emulsification index (EI24) under different physicochemical conditions. The results are summarized in Figure 3 and demonstrate that the bioemulsifier retains significant emulsifying activity across a wide range of conditions—an essential feature for industrial applications.
With respect to pH, the bioemulsifier remained stable between pH 2 and 12, with EI24 values ranging from 48.2% to 77.5%. This broad pH tolerance is consistent with studies by Dias et al. [39] and Tchakouani et al. [40], which reported that microbial biosurfactants tend to exhibit enhanced stability in both acidic and alkaline environments—making them suitable for processes involving wide pH fluctuations. The slight reduction in activity at extreme pH levels may be associated with conformational changes in the molecular structure of the bioemulsifier that hinder its interaction with oily phases.
In terms of temperature, the bioemulsifier maintained considerable emulsifying activity from 5 °C to 100 °C, with EI24 values ranging from 52.3% to 77.1%. This thermostability is advantageous for applications requiring heat resistance, such as in pharmaceutical and food processing. Similar behavior was observed by Zhang et al. [8], who noted that bioemulsifiers produced by filamentous fungi remained stable at elevated temperatures due to the protective roles of protein and lipid components in preserving molecular structure.
Regarding salinity, the bioemulsifier exhibited tolerance across NaCl concentrations ranging from 0% to 20%, with EI24 values between 58.1% and 76.5%. This salt resistance is especially relevant for marine applications or industrial processes involving high salinity. Studies by Lima et al. [29], emphasize the importance of such salt stability for the commercial viability of bioemulsifiers, as resistance to ionic stress ensures consistent emulsification performance in complex systems.

3.6. Effect on the Viscosity of Hydrophobic Compounds

Viscosity measurements revealed a significant reduction in the viscosity of the oils tested following the addition of the bioemulsifier (Table 3). Specifically, used motor oil showed a decrease from 128.4 cP to 83.7 cP (a 34.8% reduction), and soybean oil decreased from 102.3 cP to 68.1 cP (a 33.4% reduction).
This pronounced decrease in viscosity highlights the bioemulsifier’s effectiveness in modifying the rheological properties of hydrophobic compounds, thereby enhancing fluidity and dispersion. This behavior aligns with the known mechanisms of biosurfactants, which reduce interfacial tension between oil and water phases, promoting emulsification and lowering resistance to flow [41,42].
Maia et al. [37] reported similar findings, demonstrating that microbial biosurfactants significantly reduced the viscosity of crude and vegetable oils, improving processability in applications such as bioremediation and enhanced oil recovery. The observed reduction is also consistent with the amphiphilic glycolipoprotein structure of the bioemulsifier, which enables interactions with oil molecules that disrupt intermolecular forces and reduce cohesion [43].
Importantly, this reduction in viscosity has valuable implications for pharmaceutical and environmental uses, where lowering the viscosity of lipid-based formulations can enhance drug delivery efficiency and facilitate better dispersion in bioremediation processes [8,12].
In conclusion, the significant viscosity reductions observed after the addition of the bioemulsifier confirm its potential as an effective agent for modifying the physical properties of hydrophobic substances, supporting its application across diverse industrial sectors.

3.7. Full-Factorial Design

A factorial experimental design was employed to evaluate the effects of cassava wastewater and soluble starch concentrations on the bioemulsifier production yield by Aspergillus niger UCP 1064. Table 4 presents the two factors and their respective levels, each tested at three levels (−1, 0, +1).
The results of the experiments are shown in Table 5. Both cassava wastewater and soluble starch significantly influenced bioemulsifier production. The lowest yield (16.3%) was observed in the assay where only soluble starch at an intermediate concentration (4.5%) was used without any cassava wastewater (Assay 5). In contrast, the highest yield (26.1%) was achieved with a combination of 1.3% cassava wastewater and 8.0% soluble starch (Assay 8), suggesting that higher starch concentrations strongly favor bioemulsifier biosynthesis.
As shown in Figure 4, soluble starch (SS%) had the strongest positive effect on the response variable, with a standardized effect value of 7.04, indicating that it was the most influential factor in enhancing bioemulsifier production. Cassava wastewater (CWW%), representing the proportion of liquid effluent derived from cassava processing, also had a significant impact, with a standardized effect of 6.23—reinforcing its potential as a low-cost and sustainable carbon source. In the Pareto chart, the suffix (L) refers to the linear effect of each factor, (Q) denotes the quadratic effect, and 1Lby2L indicates the linear interaction between the two variables. These abbreviations help identify the individual and interactive contributions of each factor to the observed response.
The quadratic effects of cassava wastewater and soluble starch indicate that both variables have a non-linear influence on the response, suggesting that very low or very high concentrations may reduce bioemulsifier production. The interaction between the two factors had the least impact, with a standardized effect of 0.40, and was not statistically significant, indicating that no meaningful synergistic effect was observed within the tested concentration ranges.
These findings are in agreement with those of Santos et al. [31], who reported that starch-rich substrates and agro-industrial residues promote microbial growth and emulsifier biosynthesis. Similarly, Vučurović et al. [44] highlight the importance of optimizing substrate concentrations, as excess nutrients may trigger catabolic repression and reduce biosynthetic efficiency.
The ANOVA demonstrated that the regression model exhibited a high coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.960), indicating that 96.0% of the variation in bioemulsifier production was explained by the independent variables, while only 4.0% remained unexplained by the model. The reproducibility of the experimental data was confirmed by the low pure error (0.051) and the value of the adjusted determination coefficient (Adj. R2 = 0.893). The predicted versus observed values plot showed a strong correlation between the experimental results and the values estimated by the model, confirming its suitability for predicting biosurfactant production under the studied conditions.
Figure 5 illustrates the interaction between cassava wastewater and soluble starch in bioemulsifier production. The highest yields were observed at intermediate to high concentrations of both factors, supporting the trends shown in Figure 3.
The central region of the surface—ranging from 4.5% to 7.0% soluble starch and 1.3% to 2.6% cassava wastewater—exhibited a steep increase in bioemulsifier production, with yields exceeding 26%. In contrast, lower concentrations of both substrates resulted in a marked reduction in yield, likely due to nutrient limitations affecting microbial growth and biosynthetic capacity.
These results are consistent with those of Zhang et al. [8], who emphasized that balanced formulations of carbon and nitrogen sources enhance secondary metabolism and increase the production of microbial biosurfactants and bioemulsifiers.

3.8. Feasibility Analysis of Bioemulsifier Production Scale-Up for Pharmaceutical Use

Theoretical scale-up of bioemulsifier production, based on a laboratory-scale yield of 3.18 g/L, indicates promising potential for pharmaceutical applications, particularly in drug delivery systems. However, recent studies have shown that large-scale processes rarely maintain proportional productivity per liter. This is primarily due to challenges such as oxygen transfer limitations, inadequate mixing, and the formation of pH or nutrient gradients in large bioreactors [12,38].
In aerobic fermentations, maintaining a sufficient volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient (kla) is essential. For example, Li et al. [33] demonstrated that increasing agitation speed and aeration rate significantly enhanced kla and biosurfactant yields in stirred-tank reactors. Similarly, Santos et al. [31] reported a 20% reduction in biosurfactant yield when scaling up from 5 L to 500 L, due to suboptimal oxygen and nutrient transfer, despite stable temperature and pH conditions.
Considering these technical constraints, a conservative 20% reduction was applied to the theoretical yield projections to better reflect expected performance at larger volumes. The adjusted production estimates are presented in Table 6.
Recent literature emphasizes that the scalability of bioproducts such as bioemulsifiers is closely linked to the optimization of fermentation parameters—particularly oxygen transfer, agitation, and pH control. These factors are critical for maintaining productivity and ensuring the quality of the final product, as highlighted by Marques et al. [45] and Li et al. [33] Therefore, successfully scaling up production depends on integrating these parameters to ensure the bioemulsifier’s efficiency and stability at larger scales.
Furthermore, natural bioemulsifiers have gained increasing attention as biocompatible stabilizers in advanced pharmaceutical formulations, including nanostructured emulsions, liposomes, and nanoparticles for controlled drug release. Their low toxicity, biodegradability, and capacity to enhance drug bioavailability have been well documented in recent studies by Sharma et al. [10] and Shahiwala et al. [15].
Despite this promising outlook, further experimental validation is essential at pilot and industrial scales. Future studies should focus on evaluating the bioemulsifier’s stability, functionality, and compatibility with various drug compounds, as well as ensuring the robustness of the production process. This need is reinforced by Rivero et al. [16] and Barata et al. [46] who stress the importance of reproducibility and in-depth characterization for clinical applicability.

4. Conclusions

This study demonstrated the efficient production of a bioemulsifier by Aspergillus niger UCP 1064 using agro-industrial residues—specifically cassava wastewater and soluble starch—under submerged fermentation conditions. A maximum yield of 3.18 g/L was achieved after 7 days of cultivation at 28 °C and 180 rpm, using 2.6% cassava wastewater and 4.5% soluble starch as carbon sources.
The bioemulsifier exhibited strong emulsifying activity and physicochemical stability across a wide range of environmental conditions, including pH values from 2 to 12, temperatures between 5 and 100 °C, and NaCl concentrations up to 20%. Biochemical and spectroscopic analyses confirmed its glycolipoprotein composition.
Microscopic and rheological analyses revealed its ability to form stable oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions and significantly reduce the viscosity of hydrophobic substrates. These characteristics are highly relevant for potential applications in various industrial sectors, including environmental remediation and cosmetics.
Although theoretical scale-up projections indicate the feasibility of using this bioemulsifier in pharmaceutical applications, this study did not assess drug release, cytotoxicity, or in vivo biocompatibility. As such, no definitive conclusions can yet be drawn regarding its suitability for use in biological systems or drug formulations. Nevertheless, previous studies have highlighted the promise of glycolipoprotein-based bioemulsifiers as stabilizers in drug delivery systems due to their amphiphilic nature, biodegradability, and surface activity [10,12].
Future research should prioritize in vitro and in vivo biological testing, cytotoxicity assessment, formulation stability analysis, and pilot-scale production to confirm the safety and efficacy of this bioemulsifier for pharmaceutical applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, U.M.d.B.L.L., R.F.d.S.A. and G.M.d.C.-T.; methodology, U.M.d.B.L.L., G.M.d.C.-T. and. R.F.d.S.A.; software, U.M.d.B.L.L., G.M.d.C.-T. and R.F.d.S.A.; validation, U.M.d.B.L.L., R.F.d.S.A. and G.M.d.C.-T.; formal analysis, U.M.d.B.L.L. and G.M.d.C.-T.; investigation, U.M.d.B.L.L. and G.M.d.C.-T.; resources, G.M.d.C.-T.; data curation, U.M.d.B.L.L. and G.M.d.C.-T.; writing—original draft preparation, U.M.d.B.L.L. and G.M.d.C.-T.; writing—review and editing, G.M.d.C.-T.; visualization, G.M.d.C.-T.; supervision, G.M.d.C.-T.; project administration, G.M.d.C.-T.; funding acquisition, G.M.d.C.-T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), under grant number 88887.703430/2022-00 (U.M.B.L.L.), and by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), under grant number 312242/2022-4 (G.M.C.T.).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, CAPES, and CNPq for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Alizadeh-Sani, M.; Hamishehkar, H.; Khezerlou, A.; Azizi-Lalabadi, M.; Azadi, Y.; Nattagh-Eshtivani, E.; Fasihi, M.; Ghavami, A.; Aynehchi, A.; Ehsani, A. Bioemulsifiers Derived from Microorganisms: Applications in the Drug and Food Industry. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2018, 8, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Barbosa, F.G.; Marcelino, P.R.F.; Lacerda, T.M.; Philippini, R.R.; Giancaterino, E.T.; Mancebo, M.C.; dos Santos, J.C.; da Silva, S.S. Production, Physicochemical and Structural Characterization of a Bioemulsifier Produced in a Culture Medium Composed of Sugarcane Bagasse Hemicellulosic Hydrolysate and Soybean Oil in the Context of Biorefineries. Fermentation 2022, 8, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bjerk, T.R.; Severino, P.; Jain, S.; Marques, C.; Silva, A.M.; Pashirova, T.; Souto, E.B. Biosurfactants: Properties and Applications in Drug Delivery, Biotechnology and Ecotoxicology. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Devale, A.; Sawant, R.; Pardesi, K.; Perveen, K.; Khanam, M.N.; Shouche, Y.; Mujumdar, S. Production and characterization of bioemulsifier by Parapedobacter indicus. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1111135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. de Souza Mendonça, R.; Rodríguez, D.M.; de Souza, A.F.; da Silva Andrade, R.F.; Campos-Takaki, G.M.; de Almeida, S.M. Bioconversion of agro-industrial by-products into microbial lipids and bioemulsifier by Absidia cylindrospora var . cylindrospora UCP 1301. Res. Soc. Dev. 2022, 11, e30411830829. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rubio-Ribeaux, D.; da Costa, R.A.M.; Montero-Rodríguez, D.; do Amaral Marques, N.S.A.; Puerta-Díaz, M.; de Souza Mendonça, R.; Franco, P.M.; dos Santos, J.C.; da Silva, S.S. Sustainable production of bioemulsifiers, a critical overview from microorganisms to promising applications. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 39, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Frisvad, J.C.; Larsen, T.O. Chemodiversity in the genus Aspergillus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 7859–7877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, Y.; Pu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Chen, L.; Shen, C.; Zhang, W.; Cao, J.; Jiang, W. Improved sustained-release properties of ginger essential oil in a Pickering emulsion system incorporated in sodium alginate film and delayed postharvest senescence of mango fruits. Food Chem. 2024, 435, 137534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. de Oliveira Chaves, Y.A.; Val Springer, M.; Boloy, R.A.M.; de Castro Ferreira Soares, O.M.; Madeira, J.G.F. Performance Study of a Microturbine System for Cogeneration Application Using Biogas from Manipueira. BioEnergy Res. 2020, 13, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sharma, N.; Ahlawat, Y.K.; Sharma, A.J.; Chamoli, N.; Thakur, M.; Sharma, A.; Mehmood, S.; Malik, A.; Ahmed, M.; Punia, H.; et al. A comprehensive review on microbial production and significant applications of multifunctional biomolecules: Biosurfactants. Biodegradation 2025, 36, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Oliveira, D.d.S.; Gomes, G.C.; Rocha, L.C.S.; Rotella Junior, P.; Aquila, G.; Bernardes, P.A.; Janda, K. Energy and stochastic economic assessment for distributed power generation from Manipueira biogas. Environ. Technol. 2024, 45, 1608–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Patel, V.P.; Desai, S.A.; Thombare, K.C. Therapeutic Applications of Biosurfactant and Bioemulsifiers. In Microbial Surfactants in Pharmaceuticals and Cosmetics; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sankhyan, S.; Kumar, P.; Pandit, S.; Kumar, S.; Ranjan, N.; Ray, S. Biological machinery for the production of biosurfactant and their potential applications. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 285, 127765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Luft, L. Fungal Polysaccharides as Biosurfactants and Bioemulsifiers. In Fungal Biopolymers and Biocomposites: Prospects and Avenues; Deshmukh, S.K., Deshpande, M.V., Sridhar, K.R., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022; pp. 105–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shahiwala, A. Advancing drug delivery research: Sustainable strategies for innovation and translation. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2025, 15, 1513–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rivero, M.; Gutiérrez-Cacciabue, D.; Rajal, V.B.; Irazusta, V.P. Factorial designs are accurate tools to pick up the most promising extremophiles for future biosurfactant production. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 959, 178193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gupta, K.; Mishra, P.K.; Srivastava, P. Enhanced continuous production of lovastatin using pellets and siran supported growth of Aspergillus terreus in an airlift reactor. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2009, 14, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kuyukina, M.S.; Ivshina, I.B.; Makarov, S.O.; Litvinenko, L.V.; Cunningham, C.J.; Philp, J.C. Effect of biosurfactants on crude oil desorption and mobilization in a soil system. Environ. Int. 2005, 31, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Cooper, D.G.; Goldenberg, B.G. Surface-Active Agents from Two Bacillus Species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1987, 53, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Diab, A.; Din, G.E. Application of the biosurfactants produced by Bacillus spp. (SH 20 and SH 26) and P. aeruginosa SH 29 isolated from the rhizosphere soil of an Egyptian salt marsh plant for the cleaning of oil—Contaminataed vessels and enhancing the biodegradat. Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 7, 671–679. [Google Scholar]
  21. Paraszkiewicz, K.; Bernat, P.; Kuśmierska, A.; Chojniak, J.; Płaza, G. Structural identification of lipopeptide biosurfactants produced by Bacillus subtilis strains grown on the media obtained from renewable natural resources. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 209, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. DuBois, M.; Gilles, K.A.; Hamilton, J.K.; Rebers, P.A.; Smith, F. Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances; ACS Publications; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Manocha, M.S.; San-Blas, G.; Centeno, S. Lipid Composition of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis: Possible Correlation with Virulence of Different Strains. Microbiology 1980, 117, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kumar, B.; Verma, P. Biomass-based biorefineries: An important architype towards a circular economy. Fuel 2021, 288, 119622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gupta, V.K.; Pandey, A.; Koffas, M.; Mussatto, S.I.; Khare, S. Biobased biorefineries: Sustainable bioprocesses and bioproducts from biomass/bioresources special issue. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 167, 112683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N.M.P.; Hultink, E.J. The Circular Economy—A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Venkata Mohan, S.; Nikhil, G.N.; Chiranjeevi, P.; Nagendranatha Reddy, C.; Rohit, M.V.; Kumar, A.N.; Sarkar, O. Waste biorefinery models towards sustainable circular bioeconomy: Critical review and future perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 215, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Al-hazmi, M.A.; Moussa, T.A.A.; Alhazmi, N.M. Statistical Optimization of Biosurfactant Production from Aspergillus niger SA1 Fermentation Process and Mathematical Modeling. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 33, 1238–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lima, R.A.; Andrade, R.F.S.; RodrÃguez, D.M.; Araujo, H.W.C.; Santos, V.P.; Campos-Takaki, G.M. Production and characterization of biosurfactant isolated from Candida glabrata using renewable substrates. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 11, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pele, M.A.; Ribeaux, D.R.; Vieira, E.R.; Souza, A.F.; Luna, M.A.C.; Rodríguez, D.M.; Andrade, R.F.S.; Alviano, D.S.; Alviano, C.S.; Barreto-Bergter, E.; et al. Conversion of renewable substrates for biosurfactant production by Rhizopus arrhizus UCP 1607 and enhancing the removal of diesel oil from marine soil. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2019, 38, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Santos, F.F.d.; Freitas, K.M.L.d.; Pereira, A.d.S.; Fontes-Sant’Ana, G.C.; Rocha-Leão, M.H.M.d.; Amaral, P.F.F. Butter whey and corn steep liquor as sole raw materials to obtain a bioemulsifier from Yarrowia lipolytica for food oil-in-water emulsions. Ciênc. Rural 2021, 51, e20200323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sundaram, T.; Govindarajan, R.K.; Vinayagam, S.; Krishnan, V.; Nagarajan, S.; Gnanasekaran, G.R.; Baek, K.-H.; Rajamani Sekar, S.K. Advancements in biosurfactant production using agro-industrial waste for industrial and environmental applications. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1357302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, H.; Cao, W.; Lin, H.; Qin, X.; Chen, Z.; Gao, J.; Wu, L.; Zheng, H. Effect of ultrasonic power on the stability of low-molecular-weight oyster peptides functional-nutrition W1/O/W2 double emulsion. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2023, 92, 106282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thraeib, J.Z.; Altemimi, A.B.; Jabbar Abd Al-Manhel, A.; Abedelmaksoud, T.G.; El-Maksoud, A.A.A.; Madankar, C.S.; Cacciola, F. Production and Characterization of a Bioemulsifier Derived from Microorganisms with Potential Application in the Food Industry. Life 2022, 12, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Satpute, S.K.; Mone, N.S.; Das, P.; Banpurkar, A.G.; Banat, I.M. Lactobacillus acidophilus Derived Biosurfactant as a Biofilm Inhibitor: A Promising Investigation Using Microfluidic Approach. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rufino, R.D.; Luna, J.M.; Sarubbo, L.A.; Rodrigues, L.R.M.; Teixeira, J.A.C.; Campos-Takaki, G.M. Antimicrobial and anti-adhesive potential of a biosurfactant Rufisan produced by Candida lipolytica UCP 0988. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 84, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Maia, P.C.V.S.; Santos, V.P.; Fereira, A.S.; Luna, M.A.C.; Silva, T.A.L.; Andrade, R.F.S.; Campos-Takaki, G.M. An Efficient Bioemulsifier-Producing Bacillus subtilis UCP 0146 Isolated from Mangrove Sediments. Colloids Interfaces 2018, 2, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ferreira, I.N.S.; Rodríguez, D.M.; Campos-Takaki, G.M.; Andrade, R.F.d.S. Biosurfactant and bioemulsifier as promising molecules produced by Mucor hiemalis isolated from Caatinga soil. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2020, 47, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dias, G.R.; Freitas-Silva, J.; de Carvalho, M.M.; Ramos, V.F.d.S.; Muricy, G.; Rodrigues, J.C.F.; Costa, B.R.F.V.; de Oliveira, B.F.R.; Laport, M.S. Bioemulsifier from sponge-associated bacteria reduces staphylococcal biofilm. Microb. Pathog. 2024, 195, 106856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tchakouani, G.F.Y.; Mouafo, H.T.; Nguimbou, R.M.; Nganou, N.D.; Mbawala, A. Antibacterial activity of bioemulsifiers/biosurfactants produced by Levilactobacillus brevis S4 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum S5 and their utilization to enhance the stability of cold emulsions of milk chocolate drinks. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 12, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. D’Almeida, A.P.; de Albuquerque, T.L.; Rocha, M.V.P. Recent advances in Emulsan production, purification, and application: Exploring bioemulsifiers unique potentials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 278, 133672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Petra de Oliveira Barros, V.; Macedo Silva, J.R.; Maciel Melo, V.M.; Terceiro, P.S.; Nunes de Oliveira, I.; Duarte de Freitas, J.; Francisco da Silva Moura, O.; Xavier de Araújo-Júnior, J.; Erlanny da Silva Rodrigues, E.; Maraschin, M.; et al. Biosurfactants production by marine yeasts isolated from zoanthids and characterization of an emulsifier produced by Yarrowia lipolytica LMS 24B. Chemosphere 2024, 355, 141807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mujumdar, S.; Joshi, P.; Karve, N. Production, characterization, and applications of bioemulsifiers (BE) and biosurfactants (BS) produced by Acinetobacter spp.: A review. J. Basic Microbiol. 2019, 59, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vučurović, D.; Bajić, B.; Trivunović, Z.; Dodić, J.; Zeljko, M.; Jevtić-Mučibabić, R.; Dodić, S. Biotechnological Utilization of Agro-Industrial Residues and By-Products—Sustainable Production of Biosurfactants. Foods 2024, 13, 711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Marques, N.S.A.A.; Silva, I.G.S.d.; Cavalcanti, D.L.; Maia, P.C.S.V.; Santos, V.P.; Andrade, R.F.S.; Campos-Takaki, G.M. Eco-Friendly Bioemulsifier Production by Mucor circinelloides UCP0001 Isolated from Mangrove Sediments Using Renewable Substrates for Environmental Applications. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Barata, M.I.C.; Cavalcanti, M.H.C.; Rufino, R.D.; de Almeida, F.C.G.; Sarubbo, L.A. Optimized production and properties of biosurfactant from Bacillus invictae UCP1617 and its performance in a detergent formulation for environmental applications. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2025, 28, 155–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Microscopic observation (40×) of emulsion droplets formed by the bioemulsifier from Aspergillus niger.
Figure 1. Microscopic observation (40×) of emulsion droplets formed by the bioemulsifier from Aspergillus niger.
Fermentation 11 00562 g001
Figure 2. FT-IR spectrum identifying functional groups in the bioemulsifier produced by Aspergillus niger. Source: Authors (2025).
Figure 2. FT-IR spectrum identifying functional groups in the bioemulsifier produced by Aspergillus niger. Source: Authors (2025).
Fermentation 11 00562 g002
Figure 3. Stability of the bioemulsifier under different pH (A), temperature (B), and salinity (C) conditions. Source: Authors (2025).
Figure 3. Stability of the bioemulsifier under different pH (A), temperature (B), and salinity (C) conditions. Source: Authors (2025).
Fermentation 11 00562 g003
Figure 4. Standardized effects of experimental factors on bioemulsifier production. Pareto chart illustrating the standardized effects of soluble starch (SS%) and cassava wastewater (CWW%) concentrations used as carbon sources. The suffix (L) denotes the linear effect, (Q) the quadratic effect, and 1Lby2L represents the linear interaction between the two variables. The red vertical line indicates the threshold for statistical significance at p = 0.05. Standardized effects are expressed as absolute t-values. Source: Authors (2025).
Figure 4. Standardized effects of experimental factors on bioemulsifier production. Pareto chart illustrating the standardized effects of soluble starch (SS%) and cassava wastewater (CWW%) concentrations used as carbon sources. The suffix (L) denotes the linear effect, (Q) the quadratic effect, and 1Lby2L represents the linear interaction between the two variables. The red vertical line indicates the threshold for statistical significance at p = 0.05. Standardized effects are expressed as absolute t-values. Source: Authors (2025).
Fermentation 11 00562 g004
Figure 5. Response surface of bioemulsifier production as a function of cassava wastewater and soluble starch concentrations. Surface of bioemulsifier production as a function of cassava wastewater (CWW) and soluble starch (SS) concentrations. The blue dots correspond to the yield values obtained experimentally. The values shown on the X-axis (CWW) and Y-axis (SS) represent the coded levels used in the experimental design (−1.41, −1, 0, +1, and +1.41). Source: Authors (2025).
Figure 5. Response surface of bioemulsifier production as a function of cassava wastewater and soluble starch concentrations. Surface of bioemulsifier production as a function of cassava wastewater (CWW) and soluble starch (SS) concentrations. The blue dots correspond to the yield values obtained experimentally. The values shown on the X-axis (CWW) and Y-axis (SS) represent the coded levels used in the experimental design (−1.41, −1, 0, +1, and +1.41). Source: Authors (2025).
Fermentation 11 00562 g005
Table 2. Biochemical composition of the bioemulsifier produced by Aspergillus niger UCP 1064.
Table 2. Biochemical composition of the bioemulsifier produced by Aspergillus niger UCP 1064.
ComponentConcentration (mg/mL)
Total proteins12.4 ± 0.6
Total carbohydrates18.7 ± 0.9
Total lipids7.2 ± 0.3
Source: Authors (2025).
Table 3. Viscosity before and after the addition of the bioemulsifier.
Table 3. Viscosity before and after the addition of the bioemulsifier.
OilInitial Viscosity
(cP)
Final Viscosity
(cP)
Reduction (%)
Waste oil128.483.734.8
Soybean oil102.368.133.4
Source: Authors (2025).
Table 4. Factors and levels used in the experimental design.
Table 4. Factors and levels used in the experimental design.
FactorsLevels
–10+1
Cassava wastewater (%)01.32.6
Soluble starch (%)2.04.57.0
Source: Authors (2025).
Table 5. Bioemulsifier production yield in factorial experiments with varying concentrations of cassava wastewater and soluble starch.
Table 5. Bioemulsifier production yield in factorial experiments with varying concentrations of cassava wastewater and soluble starch.
AssayCassava Wastewater X1 (%)Starch
X2 (%)
Bioemulsifier Yield (%)
10.02.018.2
20.07.022.7
32.62.020.5
42.67.025.8
50.04.516.3
63.14.524.9
71.30.919.0
81.38.026.1
91.34.523.8
101.34.523.6
111.34.523.9
121.34.524.1
Source: Authors (2025).
Table 6. Theoretical scale-up estimate of bioemulsifier production for potential use in drug delivery systems.
Table 6. Theoretical scale-up estimate of bioemulsifier production for potential use in drug delivery systems.
Culture Volume (L)Estimated Production (g)
512.7
50127.2
5001272.0
Source: Authors (2025).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lins, U.M.d.B.L.; Andrade, R.F.d.S.; Campos-Takaki, G.M.d. Bioemulsifier Produced by Aspergillus niger UCP 1064 Isolated from Caatinga Soil as a Promising Molecule for Scaled-Up Pharmaceutical Applications. Fermentation 2025, 11, 562. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11100562

AMA Style

Lins UMdBL, Andrade RFdS, Campos-Takaki GMd. Bioemulsifier Produced by Aspergillus niger UCP 1064 Isolated from Caatinga Soil as a Promising Molecule for Scaled-Up Pharmaceutical Applications. Fermentation. 2025; 11(10):562. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11100562

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lins, Uiara Maria de Barros Lira, Rosileide Fontenele da Silva Andrade, and Galba Maria de Campos-Takaki. 2025. "Bioemulsifier Produced by Aspergillus niger UCP 1064 Isolated from Caatinga Soil as a Promising Molecule for Scaled-Up Pharmaceutical Applications" Fermentation 11, no. 10: 562. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11100562

APA Style

Lins, U. M. d. B. L., Andrade, R. F. d. S., & Campos-Takaki, G. M. d. (2025). Bioemulsifier Produced by Aspergillus niger UCP 1064 Isolated from Caatinga Soil as a Promising Molecule for Scaled-Up Pharmaceutical Applications. Fermentation, 11(10), 562. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11100562

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop