Next Article in Journal
A Review of Recent Advancements in the Application of Monoethanolamine for CO2 Capture
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Sonochemical Byproducts on the Gel-Based Purification of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Rational Functional Design of Carbon Quantum Dots for Food Safety and Preservation: A Critical Review

1
Analytical and Testing Center, Shanxi Normal University, Taiyuan 030031, China
2
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shanxi Normal University, Taiyuan 030031, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 23 March 2026 / Revised: 6 May 2026 / Accepted: 9 May 2026 / Published: 11 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Carbon Materials and Carbon Allotropes)

Abstract

Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) have attracted considerable attention as versatile fluorescent nanomaterials in the domains of food safety and preservation, primarily due to their tunable photoluminescence, high aqueous dispersibility, and favorable biocompatibility. Although numerous reviews have documented the synthesis and extensive applications of CQDs, a focused critical assessment specifically addressing how rational surface functionalization and heteroatom doping impact their performance within complex food matrices remains absent. This review provides a targeted analysis of the interplay between the functional design of CQDs, including both surface group engineering and elemental doping, and their practical efficacy in food-related applications. Initially, a concise overview of the fundamental aspects of CQDs relevant to their functionality is presented, emphasizing the origin and role of surface chemical groups and pivotal photophysical sensing mechanisms. Subsequently, the core of the review critically evaluates recent advancements (particularly those from 2022 onward) in the use of functionalized CQDs for detecting food contaminants (such as heavy metals, pesticide residues, antibiotic residues, pathogens, and additives) and in food preservation techniques, including active packaging, antioxidative and antimicrobial coatings, and photodynamic inactivation. Through a systematic comparison of analytical figures of merit and the effects of various matrices across different design approaches, we delineate both the established capabilities and the current limitations of CQD-based technologies in realistic food systems. The review concludes by identifying ongoing challenges, specifically, batch-to-batch consistency, the long-term safety profile of CQDs in food-contact applications, and the translation gap from laboratory innovation to industrial practice, and outlines prospective research directions. The overarching aim of this work is to provide a structured framework for understanding how deliberate functional design can lead to improved performance, thereby guiding the rational development of next-generation CQD-based materials for ensuring food quality and public health.

1. Introduction

Ensuring food safety and minimizing post-harvest losses represent significant challenges in global public health and sustainable food supply chains. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) reports that approximately 1.31 billion tonnes of food, equivalent to 13.3% of total global production, are lost annually from harvest to retail. Fruits and vegetables exhibit the highest loss rates, at 25.4% [1]. Concurrently, foodborne diseases impose a considerable economic burden. Recent estimates suggest that foodborne illnesses cost the Australian economy around $3 billion annually [2]. In the United States, updated assessments of these costs reflect a significant and enduring economic impact due to food contamination [3]. The contamination of food with heavy metals, pesticide and veterinary drug residues, foodborne pathogens, and excessive additives continually threatens human well-being. Additionally, microbial spoilage and oxidative deterioration lead to substantial economic losses throughout storage and distribution phases [4,5,6]. In response to these issues, considerable research efforts focus on developing rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective analytical methods for hazard detection, along with innovative preservation technologies aimed at extending shelf life without compromising food quality or environmental sustainability [7,8].
Within this context, carbon quantum dots (CQDs) have emerged as a versatile class of fluorescent nanomaterials. Initially discovered during the electrophoretic purification of carbon nanotubes [9] and subsequently formally designated [10], CQDs have garnered sustained attention due to their unique combination of properties: tunable photoluminescence, excellent aqueous dispersibility, straightforward synthesis from abundant precursors, favorable biocompatibility, and remarkable photostability [11,12,13]. These characteristics have established CQDs as promising candidates for diverse applications, including bioimaging, drug delivery, photocatalysis, and, most relevant to the current discussion, food safety monitoring and preservation [7,14,15,16,17].
The rapid expansion of research on CQDs has been matched by an increasing number of review articles that catalog synthesis methods, structural characteristics, optical properties, and general areas of application. Recent reviews have systematically summarized CQD definitions, synthesis pathways, and applications across various fields [18,19,20,21]. In contrast, other reviews have focused on specific topics such as antimicrobial properties for food safety [22], applications in the food industry [23], the integration of CQDs with metal-organic frameworks for sensing [24], and environmentally friendly synthesis from biomass for food packaging [25,26,27,28]. These contributions have significantly enhanced the foundational knowledge base; however, many maintain a broad, encyclopedic perspective. Consequently, there remains a notable absence of literature that explicitly and critically examines the causal relationship between intentional functionalization of CQDs and their practical performance in complex food matrices. The term “functionalized design” is often used in titles and abstracts, but its practical meaning, how specific surface chemical groups and heteroatom doping affect sensing selectivity, sensitivity, antioxidant capacity, or antimicrobial effectiveness in actual food environments, is rarely explored in depth and with systematic precision. This oversight is particularly significant in the food sector, where the complexity of matrices, regulatory safety limits, and scalability requirements present unique challenges that differ significantly from those in idealized aqueous solutions or biomedical imaging scenarios [29,30].
The current review seeks to bridge this gap by offering a focused and critical analysis of the relationship between the rational functional design of CQDs and their effectiveness in food safety and preservation. Rather than providing an exhaustive summary, we intentionally focus on two main strategies to enhance functionality, surface group engineering and heteroatom doping, and examine how each affects the performance of CQDs in detection and preservation applications. A key goal is to progress beyond mere descriptive summaries to evaluate the extent to which reported systems have been validated in realistic food matrices, taking into account analytical figures of merit, matrix interferences, and practical applicability.
This review is structured as follows: Section 2 delivers a comprehensive overview of the foundational principles of CQDs, focusing on key aspects most pertinent to functional design. This includes discussions on the origin and reactivity of surface moieties and photophysical sensing mechanisms. Section 3 examines two principal strategies for functionalization: surface modification and elemental doping, elucidating their impact on the properties of CQDs. Section 4 forms the core analytical segment, critically analyzing recent advancements in the use of functionalized CQDs for detecting various food contaminants and systematically comparing performance metrics. Section 5 explores applications in food preservation, covering topics such as coatings, active packaging, photodynamic inactivation (PDI), and intelligent freshness indicators, while considering practical limitations. Section 6 synthesizes the identified advantages and ongoing challenges, proposing future directions for research. Section 7 presents concluding remarks that highlight the significance of rational design principles in advancing CQD-based solutions toward industrial and regulatory acceptance.
By establishing a clear conceptual framework that links functional design to application-specific performance, this review aims to serve as a valuable resource for researchers endeavoring to engineer next-generation CQDs with enhanced functionalities for ensuring food quality and safety.

2. Fundamentals of CQDs Relevant to Functional Design and Food-Related Applications

Before delving into functionalization strategies and their impacts on food safety, it is crucial to develop a clear understanding of the properties of CQDs that are most relevant to these concerns. This section selectively focuses on synthesis approaches, surface chemistry, and key photophysical mechanisms that influence how CQDs can be tailored for specific applications in sensing and preservation.

2.1. Brief Overview of Synthesis Approaches

Methods for preparing CQDs are broadly categorized into “top-down” and “bottom-up” strategies [18,20,21,25]. Top-down approaches involve the cleavage of bulk carbon materials into nanoscale fragments using methods such as laser ablation, arc discharge, or electrochemical exfoliation [21]. Conversely, bottom-up strategies construct CQDs from molecular precursors through controlled carbonization and polymerization [20]. Typically, top-down approaches yield CQDs with high crystallinity, while bottom-up methods produce CQDs with amorphous cores, abundant doping sites, and rich surface functional groups [31].
Among the various techniques, hydrothermal/solvothermal synthesis and microwave-assisted pyrolysis are the most widely adopted for food safety applications due to their operational simplicity, use of green solvents, and in situ generation of surface functional groups [32,33,34]. Hydrothermal synthesis is particularly notable for its high reactant reactivity, ease of solution control, and minimal environmental impact [32]. Recent advances have increasingly utilized biomass-derived precursors, such as fruit peels, agricultural residues, and food waste, aligning with sustainability goals while conferring unique surface functionalities [27,35,36]. Table 1 compares representative synthesis methods and their relevance to food safety applications.

2.2. Surface Functional Groups: Origin and Roles

The efficacy of CQDs in complex food matrices predominantly depends on their surface chemistry. The bottom-up synthesis method typically produces a passivating layer enriched with oxygen- and nitrogen-containing functional groups, which include carboxyl (−COOH), hydroxyl (−OH), carbonyl (−C=O), and amine (−NH2) moieties [37]. These groups fulfill several pivotal roles:
(i) Colloidal Stability. Hydrophilic groups confer excellent aqueous dispersibility, which prevents aggregation and maintains stable fluorescence signals, critical for reproducible sensing in food extracts [38].
(ii) Reactive Anchors for Functionalization. Surface functional groups act as adaptable anchors for post-synthetic modifications. For example, carboxyl groups can be activated to covalently bind with specific recognition elements such as antibodies and aptamers, effectively transforming a general fluorophore into a selective probe [39,40].
(iii) Inherent Recognition Sites. Some functional groups can directly interact with analytes via non-covalent interactions. For instance, the lone pair electrons on amine groups can coordinate with heavy metal ions like Hg2+ and Cu2+, eliciting an intrinsic fluorescence response [41]. Table 2 summarizes the functional roles of these prominent surface groups.

2.3. Photophysical Mechanisms Underpinning Fluorescence Sensing

CQD-based sensors function through various mechanisms, including static quenching, dynamic quenching, Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET), the inner filter effect (IFE), and photoinduced electron transfer (PET) [41,42]:
(i) PET. Upon excitement, a CQD is quenched due to an electron transfer from an electron-rich receptor. The diminishing electron-donating ability of the analyte upon binding restores fluorescence, yielding a “turn-on” response [43].
(ii) FRET and IFE. FRET involves a non-radiative energy transfer from an excited CQD to a proximal acceptor, necessitating spectral overlap [44]. Conversely, IFE occurs when a chromophore in solution attenuates the excitation light or emission; IFE-based sensors are less complex as they do not require close proximity between donor and acceptor [45].
(iii) Aggregation-Induced Emission Quenching (AIEQ). The aggregation of CQDs, induced by analytes, leads to fluorescence quenching through π-π stacking interactions [11].

2.4. Biocompatibility and Safety Considerations for Food Contact

CQDs are generally recognized as having low cytotoxicity, especially when compared to quantum dots that contain heavy metals [11]. Recent safety assessments using citrus-derived CQDs in zebrafish exhibited no adverse effects at normal dietary exposure levels [46]. Equally, a study demonstrated the low toxicity of CQDs synthesized from paneer whey [47]. Nonetheless, comprehensive long-term toxicological data under realistic dietary conditions are lacking, which constitutes a significant barrier for their industrial application [48]. This topic is further explored in Section 6.

3. Strategies for Functional Design: Surface Engineering and Heteroatom Doping

The innate properties of pristine CQDs often do not suffice to meet the stringent requirements for food safety. This section assesses two main strategies: engineering of surface groups and heteroatom doping.

3.1. Surface Functionalization: Tailoring Surface Chemistry for Recognition and Reactivity

Surface functionalization entails the deliberate introduction or modification of functional groups to imbue specific properties [39]. This process typically involves covalent modifications, such as the formation of amide bonds between the carboxyl groups on oxidized CQDs and amine-containing recognition elements. Alternatively, noncovalent strategies, including electrostatic adsorption and π-π stacking, provide simpler methods [40]. For example, CQDs functionalized with polymyxin B, ampicillin, or gentamicin exhibit differentiated binding affinities towards various foodborne pathogens, thus facilitating discrimination within complex matrices [49].

3.2. Heteroatom Doping: Modulating Electronic Structure and Optical Properties

Heteroatom doping entails the incorporation of non-carbon atoms into the carbon lattice, fundamentally altering its electronic structure and optical properties [50,51]. This synthesis commonly includes the introduction of elements such as N, S, P, B, Si, Fe, Gd, Mn, Zn, Cu, Cl, and F, either individually or in combinations [51].
Nitrogen doping, extensively studied, enhances the quantum yield and facilitates electron transfer [52]. Doping with sulfur creates thiol-related states advantageous for the detection of heavy metals [53], while phosphorus doping broadens the bandgap and improves photocatalytic activity [54]. Co-doping strategies, such as N/S and N/P, achieve synergistic enhancements [55,56]. Table 3 summarizes commonly employed dopant elements and their applications in food safety.

3.3. Metal and Lanthanide Doping: Expanding Functionality

Doping with metal ions, including Cu, Mn, Fe, Zn, and Mg, imparts catalytic, magnetic, or enhanced optical properties [50]. Lanthanide elements, like Eu, Tb, Ce, and Nd, contribute sharp, long-lived emission peaks that enable ratiometric sensing with built-in calibration [17,50]. Table 4 offers a critical comparison of functional design strategies.

3.4. Practical Comparison of Doping Strategies for Food-Relevant Applications

Among the three doping routes, single-element N-doping appears to be the most reproducible and presents the lowest toxicity concerns. This is evidenced by consistent quantum yields reported across different laboratories and its widespread use in food-matrix validated sensors [52,59,60,61]. Co-doping may enhance multifunctionality but introduces additional synthetic variables that compromise batch consistency [50]. In contrast, metal and lanthanide-doped CQDs offer unique catalytic or ratiometric signals but are associated with significant uncertainties regarding metal leaching under acidic food conditions and have yet to be thoroughly tested in real food products [50]. Therefore, N-doping and N/S co-doping currently stand out as the most practical approaches for near-term food safety applications. Nevertheless, metal/lanthanide doping should be supported by rigorous migration and toxicity data before being considered safe for contact with food.

4. Applications of Functionalized CQDs in Food Safety Detection

This section critically examines the recent advances in the application of functionalized CQDs for detecting food contaminants. Figure 1 provides a schematic overview of the CQD-based fluorescence sensing platforms [16].

4.1. Detection of Heavy Metal Ions

Recent studies have demonstrated the practicality of sensors validated in real food matrices. Systematic reviews have highlighted functionalized carbon dots for the detection of heavy metal ions such as Hg2+, Pb2+, and Cu2+ in environmental protection and food safety [29]. For instance, Li et al. developed Ca, N-co-doped carbon dots for dual-mode detection of Hg2+ and Ag+, with smartphone integration enabling LODs of 56.2 and 90.96 nM, respectively, and recoveries ranging from 96.3% to 105.7% in real food samples [59]. Ali et al. devised a ratiometric sensor for Al3+ and Co2+ in canned tomato sauce and tuna, achieving LODs of 0.06 and 0.012 μM and recoveries between 97.0% and 100.7% [60]. Moreover, N-CQDs facilitated Hg2+ detection in seafood and rice via IFE, with an LOD of 42.4 nmol/L [61]. CQDs derived from avocado seeds have been used for analyzing Cr(VI) using enhanced absorption and fluorescence quenching techniques [62]. Table 5 summarizes representative systems.

4.2. Detection of Pesticide and Veterinary Drug Residues

Pesticide detection. Ali et al. reported on azide-functionalized carbon dots utilized for the detection of propargite in citrus and tea, achieving a LOD of 0.35 ng/mL and recovery rates between 95.2% and 97.6% [63]. N,S-co-doped CQDs have been developed for the detection of carbendazim employing a turn-off-on approach, with an LOD of 27.84 ng/mL and recoveries ranging from 96.9% to 99.36% [58]. Mango peels-derived CQDs have been applied in optical sensing of diazinon using an SPR-based sensor, achieving an LOD as low as 0.01 nM [64]. Reviews on CQD-based nanocomposites have pinpointed their potential in targeted detection of food toxins, including pesticides [65]. Various functional CQDs as fluorescent probes for detecting pesticide residues in food have been comprehensively discussed [66].
Antibiotic detection. Self-nitrogen-doped CQDs derived from shrimp shell waste were used for detecting tetracycline in milk and eggs, with an LOD of 96 nM and recovery rates ranging from 98.2% to 109.7% [67]. Ce-doped CQDs facilitated the simultaneous detection of tetracycline and carmine in meat, boasting LODs of 0.037 μM and 0.035 μM, respectively, and recovery rates from 92.0% to 115% [68]. A dual-functional fluorescent sensor based on soybean-derived N-doped carbon dots enabled discrimination and quantification of tetracyclines in milk and chicken, with an LOD of 0.12 μM for TC and recoveries between 97.2% and 110.4% [69]. P-doped CQDs from Caesalpinia sappan L. were employed for the detection of ciprofloxacin in milk, achieving an LOD of 2.06 nM [70]. Table 6 provides a comparative summary of these findings.

4.3. Detection of Foodborne Pathogens

Li et al. developed mannose-grafted carbon dots for the detection of S. typhimurium, achieving an LOD of 117 CFU/mL [71]. Xie et al. developed pH-responsive CQDs leveraging bacterial metabolism for the detection of S. aureus and E. coli, with LODs ranging from 3 to 6 CFU/mL [72]. Hassan et al. created N-doped CQD composite films possessing antimicrobial activity and fluorescence-based pathogen detection capabilities, which extended the shelf life of tomatoes from 4 to 10 days [73]. A full-color CQDs fluorescence sensing array, combined with machine learning, facilitated rapid bacterial detection and classification of five common pathogenic bacteria [74]. Onion-peel-derived CQDs demonstrated antimicrobial efficacy and biofilm control on food contact surfaces against key foodborne pathogens [75]. Nd-doped CQDs have been developed for ratiometric detection with applications in food analysis [17]. Table 7 summarizes representative systems.

4.4. Detection of Food Additives and Nutritional Components

Detection of food additives. Safaei et al. developed a ratiometric sensor for tartrazine with a LOD of 64 nM and recovery rates ranging from 97.2% to 104.4% [76]. Gao et al. created a ratiometric probe for Brilliant Blue, which includes a smartphone-assisted readout feature, and achieved a LOD of 67.78 nM [77]. Researchers have designed surface-decorated, Zn-doped CQDs for detecting tartrazine in real food samples by utilizing the IFE mechanism [78]. Furthermore, N-CQDs have been employed for the direct detection of food additives such as STPP and Al3+, with a LOD of 0.024 μM for STPP [79]. Additionally, green-synthesized amino-functionalized CQDs derived from asparagus peel facilitated the detection of Sunset Yellow with a LOD of 0.92 μM [80].
Detection of nutritional components. Zhu et al. synthesized iron-doped CQDs from coffee grounds to detect ascorbic acid in various beverages [81]. N-doped carbon dots have been used for the sensitive detection of curcumin, employing smartphone-integrated, 3D-printed platforms [82]. A dual-emission CQD-based ratiometric fluorescence sensor has also been developed for hydrocortisone detection in food, with a LOD of 0.029 μM and recovery rates ranging between 93.37% and 103.87% [83]. Additionally, a ratiometric fluorescent sensor utilizing N-GQDs@AuNCs enabled Al3+ and Cu2+ detection in fried dough twists and shellfish [84].
A critical distinction must be established between sensors tested in actual food samples and those evaluated only in simplified media such as buffers, water, or films. For example, the mannose-grafted probe exhibited a LOD of 117 CFU·mL−1 in a buffer solution [85], but its performance in complex food matrices was not explored. In another instance, a pH-responsive system demonstrated a LOD of 3–6 CFU·mL−1 in water [86]; however, factors such as protein content, fat, and autofluorescence in real matrices could significantly affect detection performance. Conversely, several heavy metal sensors have been successfully validated in canned tomato sauce, tuna, shrimp, rice, and chicken, with recovery rates ranging from 92.0 to 115% [59,60,69,73]. This confirms the superior matrix tolerance of ratiometric or dual-mode designs. Future studies should quantify matrix effects under actual food conditions to provide a meaningful comparison across different sensor platforms.

5. Applications of Functionalized CQDs in Food Preservation

Functionalized CQDs have displayed significant versatility as active components in food preservation systems. Notably, carbon dots have been extensively reviewed regarding their sustainable antioxidant effects in active food packaging, with proven efficacy across fresh produce, meat, seafood, dairy, and bakery products.

5.1. Antioxidative and Antimicrobial Coatings and Films

Niu et al. developed CQD/chitosan-PVA composite films derived from peanut shells for strawberry preservation, demonstrating 80.19% DPPH scavenging activity and more than 94% antibacterial efficiency [85]. ZnO/CQD nanocomposite agar films facilitated greater than three-log CFU/g reduction of E. coli, Salmonella, and Listeria on chicken breast under blue light illumination [86]. Jafarzadeh et al. incorporated N-CDs into sago starch bioplastic films, which reduced UV transmittance by 56% to 74% and enhanced hydrophobicity [87]. Further, lignin-derived CQDs/PVA composite films exhibited antioxidant efficiency and UV blocking of more than 90%, with a 49.6% increase in tensile strength [88]. CQDs have been recognized as green and efficient materials for the preservation of fruits and vegetables [89]. Table 8 summarizes various representative preservation systems.

5.2. CQD-Mediated Photodynamic Inactivation (PDI)

CQD-mediated PDI employs light-activated ROS generation for microbial inactivation [91]. The field of carbon dots represents a rapidly advancing area with significant potential for food safety applications, especially considering their benign and nontoxic properties compared to heavy metal-containing semiconductor QDs [22]. Du et al. utilized CQDs as photosensitizers for fresh Goji berries, extending their storage life by nine days and enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities [92]. PVA/CA-CD films have been shown to extend the shelf life of chilled mutton by six days [93]. Additionally, the use of edible coatings incorporating CQDs for fresh produce preservation has been critically reviewed from safety perspectives [94].
The efficacy of PDI is constrained by the shallow penetration of light (less than 1–2 mm for blue light), necessitating that the products be thin or transparent. Achieving uniform illumination on irregular surfaces remains technically challenging, and shadowed areas may remain untreated. The ROS generated are nonspecific and may oxidize lipids, vitamins, and pigments, possibly leading to off-flavors or nutrient degradation. Although comprehensive sensory data are still lacking, current studies are limited to the laboratory scale; scaling up to meet industrial throughput would require specialized equipment and validated treatment protocols. Additionally, the safety regarding the ingestion of residual CQDs and their photodegradation products on food surfaces has not yet been systematically assessed, which is a prerequisite for regulatory acceptance.

5.3. Intelligent Packaging: Freshness Indicators

CQDs, responsive to pH changes and biogenic amines, enable real-time freshness monitoring [95]. N, S, and P-doped carbon dots have been developed for intelligent paper sensors, enabling vapor-phase biogenic amine detection and freshness evaluation in shrimp, broccoli, and mushrooms with a LOD of 6.73 nM for spermine and 6.57 nM for spermidine [96]. Qazanfarzadeh et al. converted bread waste into CQD-starch smart films with UV-barrier, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties [90]. CQDs synthesized from lemon extract in ethyl acetate have enhanced the performance of PLA films, achieving 82% UV-blocking and greater than 90% antimicrobial activity [97]. Furthermore, N, S-co-doped fluorescent carbon dots have been integrated into PVA composite films for dual functionalities: chlortetracycline detection and UV shielding, providing over 99.5% protection against UV-C and UV-B [98]. CQDs have also been integrated into stimulus-responsive hydrogels, advancing smart food packaging with capabilities in sensing, preservation, and AI-enabled predictive quality management [99].

6. Current Advantages, Key Challenges, and Future Perspectives

6.1. Core Advantages

(i) Sustainable and Cost-Effective Synthesis. CQDs are synthesized from abundant renewable precursors, including food waste, reflecting principles of a circular economy [27,35].
(ii) Favorable Biocompatibility. CQDs demonstrate minimal cytotoxicity at concentrations relevant to the food industry [46,47].
(iii) Tunable Functionality. Techniques such as surface engineering and heteroatom doping facilitate precise control over the optical properties and selectivity of CQDs [51,52,53,54,55,56].
(iv) Multifunctional Integration. Functionalized CQDs can concurrently serve as fluorescent probes, antimicrobial agents, antioxidants, and freshness indicators [85,87].
(v) Compatibility with Digital Technologies. CQD sensors are compatible with smartphone readouts, machine learning, and IoT infrastructure [59,60,74,82].

6.2. Key Challenges

(i) Scalability and Reproducibility. Scaling up laboratory protocols often presents engineering challenges; furthermore, batch-to-batch variability necessitates systematic quality control [23,48].
(ii) Matrix Interference in Real Foods. Sensor effectiveness often diminishes in complex food matrices due to issues like autofluorescence and competitive binding [48].
(iii) Regulatory and Safety Uncertainty. Long-term toxicological data pertinent to chronic dietary exposure are scarce, and specific regulatory frameworks for CQDs have yet to be established [30,94].
(iv) Quantum Yield and Photostability Limitations. Biomass-derived CQDs typically exhibit moderate QY between 10 and 40 percent; their operational stability remains poorly characterized [48].
(v) Manufacturing Integration. Effective integration into polymer matrices and adhesion to various food surfaces require customized solutions.

6.3. Future Directions

(i) Standardization and Quality Control. The establishment of reference materials and standardized characterization protocols is crucial [100].
(ii) Long-Term Toxicological Assessment. There is an urgent need for chronic feeding studies and migration testing under realistic food-contact conditions [30].
(iii) Machine Learning-Assisted Design. ML-assisted design can significantly expedite the development of functional CQDs, with recent advances achieving 50–100 fold improvements in detection limits [74,101].
(iv) Hybrid Material Systems. The integration of metal-organic frameworks, stimuli-responsive hydrogels, and edible biopolymers can create versatile platforms [24,99,102].
(v) IoT and Supply Chain Integration. The deployment of wireless CQD sensor tags and cloud-connected monitoring networks can facilitate real-time quality tracking [103].
(vi) Green Manufacturing and Life Cycle Assessment. The adoption of continuous-flow synthesis along with comprehensive LCA studies should inform sustainable manufacturing practices [27,35].

7. Concluding Remarks

This review critically examines the relationship between the rational functional design of CQDs, through surface group engineering and heteroatom doping, and their practical performance in the detection and preservation of food contaminants. Several conclusions can be drawn. First, functionalized CQDs enable the sensitive and selective detection of a wide range of food-related analytes across various matrices, with enhancements such as ratiometric sensing and smartphone integration contributing to their robustness. Second, CQDs act as effective multifunctional components in preservation systems, providing antimicrobial activity, antioxidant protection, UV-barrier properties, and freshness indication. The conversion of waste into functional CQDs exemplifies a commitment to the principles of a circular economy. Third, the integration of CQDs with machine learning and IoT technologies holds transformative potential for real-time, predictive quality management.
However, several persistent challenges must be acknowledged: scalable synthesis with reproducible properties, effective performance in unprocessed food matrices, comprehensive long-term safety data, and well-defined regulatory pathways are yet to be fully addressed. These challenges, while significant, are surmountable and will require a sustained interdisciplinary effort. Looking forward, advances will depend on standardized quality control, systematic toxicological assessments under food-relevant exposure scenarios, machine learning-accelerated functional design, and the development of hybrid material systems. With focused investment in overcoming translational hurdles, functionalized CQDs are poised to become indispensable tools for ensuring food safety, reducing waste, and protecting public health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Z.; writing—review and editing, J.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysand during the current study.

Acknowledgments

This review did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. FAO. 13.3% of Total Food Production Lost Between Harvest and Retail. Available online: https://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals-data-portal/data/indicators/1231-global-food-losses/en#:~:text=The%20percentage%20of%20food%20lost%20globally%20after%20harvest,13.0%20percent%20in%202015%2C%20when%20global%20monitoring%20began (accessed on 20 April 2026).
  2. FSANZ. Foodborne Illness Costs Australian Economy Around $3 Billion Annually. Available online: https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/news/FSANZ%20updates%20estimate%20of%20annual%20cost%20of%20foodborne%20illness#:~:text=Foodborne%20illness%20costs%20the%20Australian%20economy%20around%20%243,%242.81%20billion%20in%202023%2C%20updated%20FSANZ%20estimates%20show (accessed on 20 April 2026).
  3. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Cost Estimates of Foodborne Illnesses—Expanded Coverage. Available online: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/cost-estimates-of-foodborne-illnesses/documentation#:~:text=The%202025%20estimates%20expand%20coverage%20beyond%2015%20major,illnesses%2C%20and%20update%20disease%20modeling%20and%20cost%20estimates (accessed on 20 April 2026).
  4. Halonen, N.; Pálvölgyi, P.S.; Bassani, A.; Fiorentini, C.; Nair, R.; Spigno, G.; Kordas, K. Bio-based smart materials for food packaging and sensors—A review. Front. Mater. 2020, 7, 521914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jeddi, M.Z.; Boon, P.E.; Cubadda, F.; Hoogenboom, R.; Mol, H.; Verhagen, H.; Sijm, D.T.H.M. A vision on the ‘foodture’ role of dietary exposure sciences in the interplay between food safety and nutrition. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 120, 288–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Singh, A.K.; Itkor, P.; Lee, M.; Saenjaiban, A.; Lee, Y.S. Synergistic integration of carbon quantum dots in biopolymer matrices: An overview of current advancements in antioxidant and antimicrobial active packaging. Molecules 2024, 29, 5138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Das, S.; Mondal, S.; Ghosh, D. Carbon quantum dots in bioimaging and biomedicines. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2024, 11, 1333752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sharma, N.; Pandey, T.; Pandey, V. Biomass-derived carbon quantum dots as sustainable nanosensors for pesticides and toxic metabolites. Environ. Sci. Nano 2026, 13, 14–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, X.; Ray, R.; Gu, Y.; Ploehn, H.J.; Gearheart, L.A.; Raker, K.; Scrivens, W.A. Electrophoretic analysis and purification of fluorescent single-walled carbon nanotube fragments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12736–12737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, Y.-P.; Zhou, B.; Lin, Y.; Wang, W.; Fernando, K.A.S.; Pathak, P.; Meziani, M.J.; Harruff, B.A.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; et al. Quantum-sized carbon dots for bright and colorful photoluminescence. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7756–7757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Molaei, M.J. Carbon quantum dots and their biomedical and therapeutic applications: A review. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 6460–6481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhu, Z.; Zhai, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhu, P.; Mao, S.; Zhu, C.; Du, D.; Belfiore, L.A.; Tang, J.; Lin, Y. Red carbon dots: Optical property regulations and applications. Mater. Today 2019, 30, 52–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ghahremani, H.; Molaei, M.J.; Salimi, E. Dextran-derived carbon quantum dots for drug delivery and food preservation. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2025, 158, 112615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, J.V.; Rhim, J.-W. Fluorescent carbon quantum dots for food contaminants detection applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 111999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Altaylı, B.; Toprak, Y.E.; Çubuk, S.; Uyumaz, F.; Kahraman, M.V. Fluorescent carbon quantum dots for toxic mercury (ii) ions detection in environmental waters. Surf. Interfaces 2025, 74, 107668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, R.; Yue, J.; Zhu, F.; Zhou, J.; Liu, X. Application progress of carbon quantum dot composites in fluorescent detection of food safety. J. Food Sci. 2025, 90, e70299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mohandoss, S.; Roy, P.; Velu, K.S.; Ahmad, N.; Ahmed, M.; Palanisamy, S.; You, S.; Mani, D.; Lee, S.W.; Kim, S.C. Yellow-emissive nd-doped carbon quantum dots for ratiometric detection of anthrax biomarker with applications in food analysis and cellular imaging. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2026, 349, 127326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rosales, S.; Medina, O.E.; Garzon, N.; Zapata, K.; Taborda, E.A.; Ordóñez, J.C.; Cortés, F.B.; Franco, C.A. Systematic review of carbon quantum dots (cqd): Definition, synthesis, applications and perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025, 219, 115854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Karki, D.; Thapa, Y.N.; Rajchal, B.; Adhikari, R. Recent advances in the synthesis of tailored carbon quantum dots and their biomedical applications. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2025, 8, 8401–8420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mujahid, M. Carbon quantum dots: Sustainable synthesis, enhanced properties, and cross-disciplinary applications. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2025, 16, 033001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sharma, A.K.; Kuamri, N.; Chauhan, P.; Thakur, S.; Kumar, S.; Shandilya, M. Comprehensive insights into carbon quantum dots: Synthesis strategies and multidomain applications. J. Fluoresc. 2025, 35, 12051–12085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Collins, J.; Yang, L.; Dong, X.; Sun, Y.-P. Antimicrobial properties of carbon “quantum” dots for food safety applications. J. Nanopart. Res. 2025, 27, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Naseer, M.S.; Imran, A.; Jameel, Q.Y.; Bishoyi, A.K.; Ahmed, F.; Elawady, A.; Rajput, P.; Islam, F.; Zahoor, T.; Kinki, A.B.; et al. Application of carbon quantum dots in food business: A comprehensive review. eFood 2025, 6, e70054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Murugesan, A.; Li, H.; Shoaib, M. Recent advances in functionalized carbon quantum dots integrated with metal–organic frameworks: Emerging platforms for sensing and food safety applications. Foods 2025, 14, 2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Solayman, H.M.; Leong, K.H.; Hossain, M.K.; Khan, M.B.; Kang, K.; Jiang, J.-J.; Abd Aziz, A. Carbon quantum dots: Comparative analysis of synthesis strategies and their environmental application. Next Mater. 2025, 8, 100787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kohli, H.K.; Parab, D. Green synthesis of carbon quantum dots and applications: An insight. Next Mater. 2025, 8, 100527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gupta, D.; Priyadarshi, R.; Tammina, S.K.; Rhim, J.-W.; Agrawal, G. Fruit processing wastes as sustainable sources to produce multifunctional carbon quantum dots for application in active food packaging. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2025, 18, 2145–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rasal, A.S.; Subrahmanya, T.M.; Kizhepat, S.; Getachew, G.; Ghule, A.V.; Devan, R.S.; Hung, W.-S.; Fahmi, M.Z.; Wibrianto, A.; Chang, J.-Y. Carbon quantum dots: Classification-structure-property-application relationship for biomedical and environment remediation. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2025, 533, 216510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lin, X.; Sun, C.; Du, W.; Li, W.; Wang, R.; Wang, C.; Su, Z.; Wang, Q.; Tian, J.; Li, W.; et al. Research progress on functional carbon dots for detecting heavy metal ions in the fields of environmental protection and food safety. Talanta 2026, 302, 129405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Riahi, Z.; Khan, A.; Kim, J.T. Chapter 28—Global regulatory aspects of carbon dot applications in the food industry. In Carbon Dots in Food Packaging and Preservation; Rhim, J.W., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2026; pp. 575–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Overview of Carbon Quantum Dots Synthesis Strategies—Photochemistry. Available online: https://photochem.alfa-chemistry.com/overview-of-carbon-quantum-dots-synthesis-strategies.html (accessed on 24 April 2026).
  32. Solayman, H.M.; Leong, K.H.; Hossain, M.K.; Kang, K.; Khan, M.B.; Jiang, J.-J.; Abd Aziz, A. State-of-the-art advances in hydrothermally synthesized carbon quantum dots: An extensive review. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2025, 43, 101533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Z.; Changotra, R.; Dasog, M.; Singh Selopal, G.; Yang, J.; He, Q.S. Carbon quantum dots: Synthesis via hydrothermal processing, doping strategies, integration with photocatalysts, and their application in photocatalytic hydrogen production. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2025, 44, e01386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rastgar, S.; Elboughdiri, N. Environmentally friendly synthesis of carbon quantum dots (cqds) to enhance photocatalytic activity for the photodegradation of various organic dyes and the evolution of hydrogen and oxygen. J. Fluoresc. 2025, 35, 13497–13543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sharma, N.; Sharma, A.; Lee, H.-J. The antioxidant properties of green carbon dots: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2025, 23, 1061–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Luo, J.; Ma, Y.; Chen, W.; Pang, J. Green synthesis of biomass carbon nanodots and their multifunctional applications. Bioresour. Technol. 2026, 448, 134292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shabbir, H.; Csapó, E.; Wojnicki, M. Carbon quantum dots: The role of surface functional groups and proposed mechanisms for metal ion sensing. Inorganics 2023, 11, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Giordano, M.G.; Seganti, G.; Bartoli, M.; Tagliaferro, A. An overview on carbon quantum dots optical and chemical features. Molecules 2023, 28, 2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yan, F.; Jiang, Y.; Sun, X.; Bai, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, X. Surface modification and chemical functionalization of carbon dots: A review. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, Y.; Wang, K.; Hou, W.; Wang, L. Carbon quantum dots for environmental catalysis: Green synthesis, surface functionalization, and interface engineering. Chem. Commun. 2025, 61, 18784–18797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Molaei, M.J. Principles, mechanisms, and application of carbon quantum dots in sensors: A review. Anal. Methods 2020, 12, 1266–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mohammed, A.S. Nitrogen-doped carbon dots in food sensing: A review of detection mechanisms and applications. RSC Adv. 2025, 15, 48727–48756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zu, F.; Yan, F.; Bai, Z.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, X. The quenching of the fluorescence of carbon dots: A review on mechanisms and applications. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 1899–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sun, Y.; Huang, L. Regulation of brightness attributes of high-stability carbon quantum dots applicable in led digital color display. J. Fluoresc. 2025, 35, 5035–5044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pan, L.; Sun, S.; Zhang, A.; Jiang, K.; Zhang, L.; Dong, C.; Huang, Q.; Wu, A.; Lin, H. Truly fluorescent excitation-dependent carbon dots and their applications in multicolor cellular imaging and multidimensional sensing. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 7782–7787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Malavika, V.; Rajan, M.R.; Krishnamoorthi, R.; Adithya, K.C.; Kim, K.-S. Citrus-derived carbon quantum dots: Synthesis, characterization, and safety evaluation in zebrafish (Danio rerio) for potential biomedical and nutritional applications. Micro 2025, 5, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nataraj, B.H.; Srivastava, S.K.; Vishwakarma, S.; Mallappa, R.H.; Singh Parmar, A. Hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of carbon quantum dots from paneer whey and evaluation of their in-vitro safety, anti-oxidant and antagonistic properties. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2025, 19, 5958–5970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Das, P.; Nath, P.C.; Pandey, V.K.; Singh, R.; Rustagi, S.; Shaikh, A.M.; Kovács, B. Carbon quantum dots as emerging biosensors for food safety and environmental applications: Advances and challenges. Appl. Food Res. 2025, 5, 101255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xiao, M.; Mei, L.; Qi, J.; Zhu, L.; Wang, F. Functionalized carbon quantum dots fluorescent sensor array assisted by a machine learning algorithm for rapid foodborne pathogens identification. Microchem. J. 2024, 201, 110701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mohandoss, S.; Roy, P.; Ahmad, N.; Gomez, P.L.A.M.; Velu, K.S.; Somu, P.; Kim, S.-C. A comprehensive review of multifunctional carbon quantum dots (cqds): Heteroatom, metal, and lanthanide doping for advanced sensing applications. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2026, 183, 115698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sethulekshmi, A.S.; Aparna, A.; Parvathi, P.; Pathak, R.; Punetha, V.D.; Selvaraj, M.; Saritha, A. Advances in doped carbon quantum dots: Synthesis, mechanisms, and applications in sensing technologies. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 514, 163262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nguyen, K.G.; Baragau, I.-A.; Gromicova, R.; Nicolaev, A.; Thomson, S.A.J.; Rennie, A.; Power, N.P.; Sajjad, M.T.; Kellici, S. Investigating the effect of n-doping on carbon quantum dots structure, optical properties and metal ion screening. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 13806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ren, H.; Labidi, A.; Sun, J.; Allam, A.A.; Ajarem, J.S.; Abukhadra, M.R.; Wang, C. Facile synthesis of nitrogen, sulfur co-doped carbon quantum dots for selective detection of mercury (ii). Environ. Chem. Lett. 2024, 22, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhao, W.; Wan, R.; Sun, X.; Wang, Z.; Gong, Z.; Guo, L.; Marzouki, R.; Luo, M.; Li, A.; Ning, H.; et al. Inhibition mechanism of phosphorus-doped carbon quantum dots on anodic corrosion in neutral mg-air batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2025, 1037, 182609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, Y.; Qin, H.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Liu, H.; Liu, H.; Wang, Z.J.; Li, R. Highly fluorescent nitrogen and boron doped carbon quantum dots for selective and sensitive detection of Fe(3). J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 4654–4662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Li, X.; Wang, C.; Li, P.; Sun, X.; Shao, Z.; Xia, J.; Liu, Q.; Shen, F.; Fang, Y. Beer-derived nitrogen, phosphorus co-doped carbon quantum dots: Highly selective on–off-on fluorescent probes for the detection of ascorbic acid in fruits. Food Chem. 2023, 409, 135243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liang, J.M.; Zhang, F.; Zhu, Y.L.; Deng, X.Y.; Chen, X.P.; Zhou, Q.J.; Tan, K.J. One-pot hydrothermal synthesis of Si-doped carbon quantum dots with up-conversion fluorescence as fluorescent probes for dual-readout detection of berberine hydrochloride. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2022, 275, 121139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, Z.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, F.; Yang, H.; Guo, L.; Chai, F. High sensitive and selective multivariate detection of Hg2+ and Ag+ in real food samples via ca, n-co-doped carbon dots based dual-mode platform. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2025, 343, 126536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Ali, A.-M.B.H.; Elmasry, M.R.; Bin Jardan, Y.A.; El-Wekil, M.M. Smart fluorometric sensing of metal contaminants in canned foods: A carbon dot-based dual-response system for quantifying aluminum and cobalt ions. RSC Adv. 2025, 15, 6962–6973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shan, D.; Yu, H.; Yang, Z.; Li, H.; Jia, R.; Zhang, Y. Nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots (ncqds) detected to mercury ions in food monitoring. Food Chem. 2025, 463, 141308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Mkhize, A.; Nocanda, X.; Booysen, I.N.; Mambanda, A. Enhanced absorption and fluorescence quenching methods for the quantitative analysis of cr(vi) ions using avocado seed-derived carbon quantum dots as pseudo-derivatising reagents. Nanoscale 2026, 18, 8278–8296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ali, R.; Alhazzani, K.; Alanazi, A.Z.; Barker, J.; Mostafa, A.M.; El-Wekil, M.M.; Goda, M.N.; Ali, A.-M.B.H. Selective detection of terminal alkyne acaricide via click-reactive carbon dots: Applications in food safety monitoring. Anal. Methods 2025, 17, 8923–8934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pawar, R.V.; Patil, P.O.; Khalid, M.; Wahab, S.; Taleuzzaman, M.; Pardeshi, S.R.; Khan, Z.G. Design of a facile fluorescent nano-sensor using nitrogen and sulfur dual doped carbon quantum dots for carbendazim detection: A turn-off-on approach for food safety and environmental monitoring. J. Fluoresc. 2025, 35, 11175–11190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Asri, N.A.N.; Fen, Y.W.; Fauzi, N.I.M.; Kamaruzzaman, N.A.; Khaidir, R.E.M.; Hashim, H.S.; Anuar, M.F.; Zailani, M.A.Z.M.; Fadzil, A.D.I.M.; Basari, N.N.A.M.; et al. Mango peels-assisted synthesis of carbon quantum dots for potential optical sensing of diazinon. Sci. Rep. 2026, 16, 4341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vijaybhai, B.M.; Singh, A.; Singh, G.; Tangra, A.K.; Sankhla, M.S. Advances in carbon quantum dot-based nanocomposites for targeted detection of food toxins: A focus on safety applications. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2025, 148, 108321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tian, J.; Yang, R.; Ren, X.; Wang, Q.; Qing, J.; Li, W.; Wang, R.; Su, Z.; Wang, C.; Lin, X.; et al. Research progress on functional carbon quantum dots fluorescent probes for detecting pesticide residues in food. Microchim. Acta 2026, 193, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chen, M.; Wu, D.; Deng, X.; Ma, J.; Fan, H.; Huang, X.; Wang, P.; Li, Y.; Liao, X.; Si, L.; et al. Ultrasensitive detection of tetracycline in animal-origin foods using self-nitrogen doped carbon dots as fluorescent probes. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2025, 142, 107414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, Q.; Xie, M.; Tian, X.; Luo, X.; Zheng, B.; Mou, S.; Wang, M.; Luo, X.; Zou, Q. A one-stone-two-birds strategy: Cerium-doped carbon dots as a dual probes platform for quantification of tetracycline and carmine in foods. Microchim. Acta 2026, 193, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lin, X.; Wang, J.; Xia, M.; Li, S.; Xu, Y.; Sun, J.; Leng, H.; Song, T.; Xing, Y.; Yang, M. A dual-functional fluorescent sensor based on a single soybean-derived carbon dots for discrimination and quantification of tetracyclines in food. Food Chem. 2026, 514, 149094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pei, S.; Yan, K.; Cai, S.; Hou, Y.; Luo, K.; Xiang, P.; Peng, Y. Preparation of carbon quantum dot fluorescent probe from Caesalpinia sappan L. for the detection of ciprofloxacin and antibacterial applications. Sci. Rep. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Li, J.; Ma, G.; Wang, X.; Cai, J.; Wang, X. A mannose-functionalized carbon dot and boronic acid–graphene oxide nanocomposite fluorescent probe for salmonella typhimurium detection. Anal. Methods 2025, 17, 7468–7481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xie, L.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, B.; Liu, M. A novel fluorescent sensing system based on ph-responsive carbon dots for the identification and detection of bacteria. New J. Chem. 2025, 49, 15973–15979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tohamy, H.-A.S. Beet root carbon dots cellulose sulfate film as a novel naked eye ph sensor for chromium and bacterial detection in tomatoes. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 30235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kang, L.; Wang, J.; Lin, X.; Feng, J.; Duan, N.; Wang, Z.; Wu, S. A full-color carbon quantum dots fluorescence sensing array combined with machine learning for rapid bacterial detection and classification. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2026, 15, e02916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ahn, J.M.; Kim, Y.H.; Rhim, J.-W.; Yoon, K.S. Onion-peel carbon quantum dots: Antimicrobial effect and biofilm control on food contact surfaces. Foods 2025, 14, 4296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Safaei, A.; Giyahban, F.; Ebrahimzadeh, H. Development of a ratiometric fluorescence sensor based on blue- and orange-emissive carbon dots for the determination of tartrazine in food products. Food Chem. 2025, 477, 143582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gao, F.; An, K.; Chen, X.; Fu, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, L.; Jia, H.; Bian, W. Carbon dot- and curcumin dye-based dual-emission fluorescence ratiometric probes for rapid smartphone detection of brilliant blue in food. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2025, 8, 12322–12328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chaudhari, S.S.; Patil, P.O.; Mali, S.S.; Alam, M.S.; Nangare, S.N.; Bari, S.B.; Khan, Z.G. Design and synthesis of surface-decorated zinc-doped carbon quantum dots as fluorescent probes for tartrazine detection in real food samples exploiting the inner filter effect mechanism. Food Control 2025, 168, 110925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, J.; Li, Q.; Wang, W.; Wang, Q.; Fu, Y. Fluorescent probes based on n-cqds: For direct detection of food additives stpp and Al3+. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2025, 324, 125036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zou, J.; Tan, S.; Yan, F.; Yang, B.; Li, C.; Wu, S. A green synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots and their application to the determination of sunset yellow. Foods 2025, 14, 3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Zhu, Y.; Deng, X.; Chen, J.; Hu, Z.; Wu, F. Coffee grounds-derived carbon quantum dots as peroxidase mimetics for colorimetric and fluorometric detection of ascorbic acid. Food Chem. 2023, 429, 136957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Nath, P.; Dey, A.; Kundu, T.; Pathak, T.; Chatterjee, M.; Roy, P.; Satapathi, S. Highly fluorescent nitrogen doped carbon dots as analytical probe for sensitive detection of curcumin through smartphone integrated 3d-printed platform: A new horizon in food safety. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2025, 326, 125260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Cai, Z.; Yang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Xing, W.; Yang, S. Ratiometric fluorescence sensor based on carbon quantum dots for hydrocortisone detection in food samples. Food Chem. 2025, 495, 146636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Li, M.; Chen, X.; Xia, X.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, W.; Xu, Q.; Zhao, X. A ratiometric fluorescent sensor for Al3+ and Cu2+ detection in food samples. Front. Nutr. 2025, 12, 1707179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Niu, K.; Yao, F.; Ma, Y.; Lv, D.; Chen, F. Multifunctional peanut shell-derived carbon dots/chitosan-polyvinyl alcohol composite films for preservation of fruits. J. Food Sci. 2026, 91, e71016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Na, G.; Kang, J.-W. Sustainable agar-based film with zinc oxide/carbon quantum dot (zno/cqd) nanocomposite for photocatalytic antimicrobial and antioxidant packaging of chicken breast. Food Hydrocoll. 2025, 168, 111568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sharma, S.; Riahi, Z.; Khan, A.; Mishra, N.C.; Priyadarshi, R.; Rhim, J.-W. Carbon dots as sustainable antioxidants in active food packaging applications: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2026, 170, 105602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jafarzadeh, S.; Golgoli, M.; Qazanfarzadeh, Z.; Forough, M.; Wu, P.; Timms, W.; Barrow, C.J.; Naebe, M.; Zargar, M. Evaluating the influence of carbon quantum dots on starch-based bioplastics: Toward potential food packaging applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2025, 50, 101555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zheng, Y.; Ma, X.; Su, X.; Li, J.; Li, D.; Li, Y. Development of highly transparent and multifunctional lignin-derived carbon quantum dots/pva composite films for active food packaging. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2025, 65, 6010–6020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Liu, Z.; Yang, F.; Zhang, G.; Liao, Y.; Cui, M.; Li, H.; Hu, L.; Mo, H. Carbon quantum dots: A green and efficient material for fruits and vegetables preservation. Food Rev. Int. 2025, 42, 694–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Qazanfarzadeh, Z.; Baptista, H.; Nunes, C.; Kumaravel, V. Development of smart food packaging from bread waste-derived starch and carbon quantum dots. Ind. Crops Prod. 2025, 233, 121426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sheng, L.; Li, X.; Wang, L. Photodynamic inactivation in food systems: A review of its application, mechanisms, and future perspective. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 124, 167–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Du, J.; Ni, Z.-J.; Wang, W.; Thakur, K.; Ma, R.-H.; Ma, W.-P.; Wei, Z.-J. Carbon dot-mediated photodynamic treatment improves the quality attributes of post-harvest goji berries (Lycium barbarum L.) via regulating the antioxidant system. Foods 2024, 13, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Xia, F.; Zhang, H.; Yu, Y.; Jiang, C.; Kang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, P.; Sun, W. Novel photodynamic antimicrobial films loaded with chinese artichoke carbon dots for chilled mutton preservation. Food Chem. 2025, 495, 146492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Priyadarshi, R.; Uzun, S.; Rhim, J.-W. Edible coating using carbon quantum dots for fresh produce preservation: A review of safety perspectives. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 331, 103211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Riahi, Z.; Khan, A.; Rhim, J.-W.; Shin, G.H.; Kim, J.T. Carbon dot-based ph-responsive indicators for intelligent food packaging and food safety control. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 163, 105200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sasikumar, T.; Shin, G.H.; Kim, J.T. N, s, and p-doped carbon dots for intelligent paper sensors: Vapor-phase biogenic amine detection and freshness evaluation of foods. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2025, 52, 101647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Han, S.; Ansari, J.R.; Park, K.; Sadeghi, K.; Seo, J. Carbon quantum dots synthesized from a lemon extract in ethyl acetate to enhance the performance of polylactic acid films for packaging applications. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2026, 153, 395–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Shi, X.; Wu, S. Nitrogen and sulfur co-doped fluorescent carbon dots constructing pva@n, s-cds composite film: A next-generation food packaging material with dual functions of chlortetracycline detection and ultraviolet shielding. Small 2026, 22, e14630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Li, M.; Du, Y.; Zhao, J.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yi, J. Carbon quantum dot-enhanced stimulus-responsive hydrogels for smart food packaging: Sensing, preservation, and ai-enabled predictive quality management. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2026, 53, 101701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Jena, T.; Shinde, S.; Roselin, S.E.; Sujana, C.; Rao, V.S.; Immanuvel Arokia James, K. Deep learning-optimized carbon quantum dot biosensors for emerging contaminant monitoring. Microchem. J. 2025, 218, 115389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Mohammed, A.S.; Mohammed, S.J. Carbon dot-integrated edible films: Emerging synergies for advanced food packaging applications. RSC Adv. 2026, 16, 12012–12036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Fan, K. Recent advances in carbon dots-loaded composite films for food preservation and freshness monitoring: A review. Food Biosci. 2025, 74, 107839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Applications of CQDs in food safety detection. Reproduced from [16] Copyright Wiley-Blackwell 2025.
Figure 1. Applications of CQDs in food safety detection. Reproduced from [16] Copyright Wiley-Blackwell 2025.
Carbon 12 00040 g001
Table 1. Comparison of CQDs synthesis methods and their relevance to food safety applications.
Table 1. Comparison of CQDs synthesis methods and their relevance to food safety applications.
Synthesis MethodTypical PrecursorsKey AdvantagesLimitationsRelevance to Food ApplicationsRef.
HydrothermalCitric acid, glucose, biomassHigh quantum yield; abundant surface groups; green solventBatch-to-batch variation; requires autoclaveMost widely used for food sensors and preservation coatings[32,33,34]
Microwave-assistedCitric acid, urea, amino acidsRapid synthesis; energy-efficient; good dispersibilityNon-uniform particle sizeRapid screening of functionalized CQDs[21,27]
Pyrolytic carbonizationBiomass waste (peels, shells, whey)Sustainable, low-cost; waste valorizationComplex purification; lower quantum yieldGreen synthesis for active food packaging[27]
ElectrochemicalGraphite, carbon nanotubesStrong fluorescence stability; controllable sizeLow quantum yield; requires post-treatmentLimited food applications[21]
Laser ablationGraphite powder, carbon targetsAbundant raw materials; no chemical additivesExpensive equipment; low yieldRarely used in food-related research[21]
Table 2. Functional roles of major surface groups on CQDs in food safety and preservation applications.
Table 2. Functional roles of major surface groups on CQDs in food safety and preservation applications.
Functional GroupProperty ConferredRole in SensingRole in PreservationRef.
Carboxyl (−COOH)Hydrophilicity; negative chargeConjugation anchor; electrostatic attraction of cationsEnhances aqueous dispersibility[37,39]
Hydroxyl (−OH)Hydrophilicity; hydrogen bondingStabilizes CQDs in aqueous media; H-bonding recognitionRadical scavenging (antioxidant)[37,38]
Amine (-NH2)Positive charge (acidic pH); electron donorMetal ion coordination; PET-based sensingAntimicrobial activity via membrane disruption[37,41]
Carbonyl (−C=O)Electron-withdrawingModulates band gap and emissionMinor contribution to antioxidant activity[37]
Thiol (-SH)Strong metal affinity; redox activitySelective binding of heavy metals (Hg2+, Pb2+)Potential antioxidant effects[41]
Table 3. Summary of heteroatom dopants for CQDs.
Table 3. Summary of heteroatom dopants for CQDs.
DopantTypical PrecursorsImparted PropertiesRepresentative Food Safety ApplicationRef.
Nitrogen (N)Urea, ethylenediamineEnhanced QY; n-type dopingDetection of antibiotics, pesticides, heavy metals[52]
Sulfur (S)Sodium sulfide, cysteineThiol-related states; affinity for Hg2+, Pb2+Selective heavy metal detection in seafood[53]
Phosphorus (P)Phosphoric acidExpanded bandgap; enhanced ROS generationPhotodynamic inactivation; antioxidant packaging[54]
Boron (B)Boric acidp-type doping; enhanced sensingDetection of phenolic contaminants[27]
Silicon (Si)APTES, APTMSUp-conversion fluorescence; enhanced photostabilityDual-readout detection of alkaloids[57]
N/S co-dopingUrea + thioureaSynergistic QY enhancement; dual active sitesSimultaneous multi-metal detection[53,58]
N/P co-dopingEthylenediamine + phosphoric acidEnhanced ROS generationPhotodynamic antibacterial coatings[56]
Table 4. Critical comparison of functional design strategies for CQDs.
Table 4. Critical comparison of functional design strategies for CQDs.
Design StrategyKey AdvantagesLimitationsBest Suited forRef.
Surface functionalizationDirect control over surface chemistry; covalent attachment of biorecognition elementsMay reduce QY; biomolecule stability in food matrices may be limitedSelective pathogen detection; aptamer/antibody-based sensing[39,40]
Single-element dopingSignificant QY enhancement; simple one-step synthesisLimited tunability; predominantly blue-green emissionGeneral fluorescence sensing; metal ion detection[52,53]
Co-dopingSynergistic property enhancement; multifunctional capabilitiesComplex optimization; reproducibility challengesRatiometric sensing; photodynamic inactivation[55,56]
Metal/Lanthanide dopingCatalytic/redox activity; ratiometric sensingPotential toxicity concerns; expensive precursorsElectrochemical sensors; high-precision ratiometric sensing[17,50]
Table 5. Representative functionalized CQDs for heavy metal ion detection in food matrices.
Table 5. Representative functionalized CQDs for heavy metal ion detection in food matrices.
CQD SystemFunctional DesignTargetFood MatrixLODRecovery (%)Ref.
E-CDs (Ca,N-co-doped)Ca/N co-doping; dual-modeHg2+, Ag+Real food samples11.28 nM; 128.23 nM96.3–105.7[59]
N,S-doped CQDsDual-emission; ratiometricAl3+, Co2+Canned tomato sauce, tuna0.06 μM; 0.012 μM97.0–100.7[60]
N-CQDsN-doping; IFEHg2+Shrimp, crab, carp, rice42.4 nmol/LSatisfactory[61]
Avocado seed-derived CQDsBiomass-derivedCr(VI)Water/food samplesEnhanced absorption/fluorescence[62]
Table 6. Representative functionalized CQDs for pesticide and veterinary drug detection.
Table 6. Representative functionalized CQDs for pesticide and veterinary drug detection.
CQD SystemFunctional DesignTargetFood MatrixLODRecovery (%)Ref.
Az-CDsAzide surface functionalizationPropargiteCitrus, tea0.35 ng mL−195.2–97.6[63]
N-S@CQDsN,S-co-doping; turn-off-onCarbendazimReal food samples27.84 ng/mL96.9–99.36[58]
Mango peel-derived CQDsBiomass-derived; SPR sensingDiazinonEnvironmental/food0.01 nM[64]
N-CDs (shrimp shell)Self-N-dopingTetracyclineMilk, egg96 nM98.2–109.7[67]
Ce-CDsCe-dopingTetracycline, CarmineMeat0.037; 0.035 μM92.0–115[68]
N-BCDsSoybean-derived N-dopingTetracyclinesMilk, chicken0.12 μM97.2–110.4[69]
P-CQDsP-doping; C. sappan L.CiprofloxacinMilk2.06 nM[70]
Table 7. Representative functionalized CQDs for foodborne pathogen detection.
Table 7. Representative functionalized CQDs for foodborne pathogen detection.
CQD SystemFunctional DesignTargetFood MatrixLODPerformance NotesRef.
g-CDs-M/GO-PBAMannose graftingS. typhimuriumBuffer117 CFU·mL−1Linear range: 102–107 CFU·mL−1[71]
pH-CDspH-responsiveS. aureus, E. coliWater3–6 CFU·mL−1Species differentiation[72]
N-CDs-CS-CMC filmN-doping; compositeE. coli, S. aureusTomatoShelf life: 4 to 10 days[73]
Full-color CQDs arrayML-assisted; multichannel5 pathogenic bacteriaPork matrix>93% accuracyMachine learning integration[74]
Onion-peel CQDsBiomass-derivedS. typhimurium, L. monocytogenesFood contact surfacesMIC: 1200–2200 μg/mLBiofilm reduction: 74–91%[75]
Table 8. Representative CQD-based coatings and films for food preservation.
Table 8. Representative CQD-based coatings and films for food preservation.
CQD SystemFunctional DesignMatrixTarget FoodKey PerformanceRef.
Peanut shell-CDsBiomass-derived; photocatalytic ROSCS/PVAStrawberry80.19% DPPH scavenging; >94% antibacterial[85]
ZnO/CQDCQDs improve ZnO dispersionAgarChicken breast>3-log CFU/g reduction[85]
N-CDsN-dopingSago starchModel system56–74% UV reduction; improved hydrophobicity[87]
LCQDs/PVALignin-derivedPVAActive packaging>90% antioxidant/UV blocking; 49.6% tensile strength increase[88]
Bread waste-CQDsWaste valorizationStarch filmSmart packaging79.13% DPPH scavenging; pH-responsive[90]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Z.; Du, J. Rational Functional Design of Carbon Quantum Dots for Food Safety and Preservation: A Critical Review. C 2026, 12, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/c12020040

AMA Style

Zhang Z, Du J. Rational Functional Design of Carbon Quantum Dots for Food Safety and Preservation: A Critical Review. C. 2026; 12(2):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/c12020040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Ziting, and Juan Du. 2026. "Rational Functional Design of Carbon Quantum Dots for Food Safety and Preservation: A Critical Review" C 12, no. 2: 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/c12020040

APA Style

Zhang, Z., & Du, J. (2026). Rational Functional Design of Carbon Quantum Dots for Food Safety and Preservation: A Critical Review. C, 12(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/c12020040

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop