Next Article in Journal
Study of Orifice Design on Oleo-Pneumatic Shock Absorber
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Energy Budget Characterisation of the Optimal Disturbance in Stratified Shear Flow
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Are Local Heat Transfer Quantities Useful for Predicting the Working Behavior of Different Pulsating Heat Pipe Layouts? A Comparative Study

1
Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 181/A, 43121 Parma, Italy
2
SITEIA.PARMA Interdepartmental Centre, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 181/A, 43121 Parma, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fluids 2024, 9(5), 107; https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9050107
Submission received: 18 March 2024 / Revised: 22 April 2024 / Accepted: 24 April 2024 / Published: 30 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Challenges and Advances in Heat and Mass Transfer)

Abstract

:
Despite a continuous effort devoted by the scientific community, a large-scale employment of Pulsating Heat Pipes for thermal management applications is still nowadays undermined by the low reliability of such heat transfer systems. The main reason underlying this critical issue is linked to the strongly chaotic thermofluidic behavior of these devices, which prevents a robust prediction of their working behavior for different geometries and operating conditions, consequently hampering proper industrial design. The present work proposes to thoroughly compare data referring to previous infrared investigations on different Pulsating Heat Pipe layouts, which have focused on the estimation of heat fluxes locally exchanged at the wall–fluid interfaces. The aim is to understand the beneficial contribution of local heat transfer quantities in the prediction of the complex physics underlying such heat transfer systems. The results have highlighted that, regardless of the considered geometry and working conditions, wall-to-fluid heat fluxes are able to provide useful quantities to be employed, to some extent, to generalize Pulsating Heat Pipe operation and to improve their existing numerical models.

1. Introduction

Pulsating Heat Pipes (PHPs) are promising passive two-phase heat transfer devices which have achieved resounding interest among the scientific community during the last decades due to their highly advantageous technological features and are especially useful for thermal management applications [1]. Specifically, PHPs are pipes partially filled with a working fluid in saturation conditions and often constituted by three main sections, namely the evaporator (heated area), the condenser (cooled area), and the adiabatic section (transport section). Effective heat dissipation is generally obtained at the heated area thanks to self-sustained, thermally driven oscillations between the evaporator and the condenser through the adiabatic section [2]. Depending on their layout, PHPs may be classified as tubular PHPs, made of a tube arranged in a serpentine manner, and Flat Plate PHPs (FPPHPs), where the channels for the working fluid are machined on a flat plate [3,4,5]. Moreover, when the inner hydraulic diameter falls below 500 μm, devices are usually referred to as micro-PHPs [6].
PHP heat transfer performance is usually studied in terms of thermal characterizations, i.e., by evaluating equivalent thermal resistances under different operating conditions, including varying working fluid, the heat load to the evaporator, orientation, and condenser temperature [7,8,9,10,11]. Such an approach has been proven to be extremely suitable and effective from an application standpoint, i.e., when specific applications are considered, spanning from thermal management of batteries and electronic equipment to heat recovery applications and the cooling of foldable systems in both standard and microgravity conditions [12,13,14]. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of equivalent thermal resistance in terms of overall generalization of the working behavior is extremely controversial. In fact, the available literature does not provide any established methods for the prediction of PHP operation. Generalization attempts have been carried out in the past decades by means of empirical and semi-empirical correlations. Rittidech et al. [15] were among the first researchers to propose empirical correlations for PHPs. Their model aimed at predicting the transferred heat flux at horizontal orientation by evaluating the Kutateladze number. The standard deviation between the prediction and the experiments was equal to ±30%. However, the quantity of available experimental data on heat fluxes were quite limited due to the still premature literature, resulting in probably lower robustness and reliability of the proposed correlation. Khandekar et al. [16] highlighted the better fitting performances of semi-empirical models over standard empirical ones. A total of 248 data points on tubular pulsating heat pipes were used to develop, together with theoretical models, a correlation for the maximum heat flux exchangeable by a PHP device, with an overall drift in prediction of ±30%. Qu and Wang [17] used collected data on three PHPs, presenting different inner diameters and tested with different working fluids/volumetric filling ratios and previous outcomes from the literature to design an empirical correlation based on a total of 510 data points. The average standard deviation between the employed data and the predicted Kutateladze number and thermal performance was equal to ±40%.
More recently, artificial neural networks have been explored to improve the prediction capabilities of empirical and semi-empirical models, hence tackling difficulties linked to the critical definition of influencing parameters and dimensionless groups for the description of PHP complex thermo-fluid dynamics. Wang et al. [18] used 772 data points picked from previous studies on different PHPs presenting varying geometrical and operational features to build an artificial neural network model with 7 nodes in the input layer, 11 nodes in the hidden layer, and 1 node in the output layer. The prediction capability was assessed to be highly superior to traditional empirical correlations (average accuracy of about 0.22% for thermal resistance prediction), although the working fluid greatly affected model’s deviations from the experimental data. High prediction accuracies were also assessed by other neural network models, such as the ones by Jokar et al. [19] (average relative error less than 5%) and by Ahmadi et al. [20] (minimum deviation of 3.33% achieved through the least-squares support-vector machine model). However, as underlined by Kholi et al. in their review article [21], artificial neural network models per se provide no physical insight into the PHP thermo-fluid dynamics, resulting in poor flexibility and accuracy outside the training dataset ranges. Such an issue inevitably undermines a full understanding of the complex physics underlining PHP functioning as well as a robust conceptualization of design techniques to be used for reliable, large-scale employment by industries [2]. Typical figures of merit, such as equivalent thermal resistances, have been thus proven to provide viable pieces of information on PHP-influencing parameters while lacking generality probably due to almost absent standardization of experimental approaches.
In the last few years, research effort has been devoted to the comprehension of the inner thermo-fluid dynamics of PHPs through the promotion of novel figures of merit, including heat fluxes locally exchanged between the working fluid and the PHP walls. Jo et al. [22] investigated a flat micro-PHP to shed light on the debated sensible/latent heat transfer processes occurring in PHPs. The adopted multilayer structure of the walls allowed simultaneous assessment of outer and inner wall temperatures in the overall system through thermography, which resulted in the estimation of wall-to-fluid heat fluxes in all the device sections (evaporator, condenser, and adiabatic section). Additional direct visualizations enabled a one-to-one comparison between the liquid–vapor phase displacement and exchanged heat flux to ponder sensible/latent heat contributions. However, it has to be underlined that, despite the high temporal and spatial accuracy of the method, the realization of such a multilayer structure, which represents the core of the estimation of local heat fluxes in [22], would be unfeasible for tubular devices due to manufacturing difficulties. Moreover, the presented results might not be extended to the physical description of more typical PHP layouts, such as those made of metallic materials, due to intrinsic differences in terms of overall convective and conductive heat transfer. To address these issues, local wall-to-fluid heat fluxes have been evaluated in the previous literature by means of different experimental and post-processing approaches for metallic devices. Pagliarini et al. [23] proposed a novel technique for estimating heat fluxes locally exchanged between the working fluid and the walls in three-dimensional, tubular PHPs made of aluminum channels (also called “Space PHPs”) under microgravity conditions. Specifically, the experimental analysis was based on non-intrusive, infrared (IR) acquisitions on the outer wall surfaces within the adiabatic section (opportunely coated with highly emissive paints), used as inputs for the Inverse Heat Conduction Problem (IHCP) resolution approach. The results highlighted the high capability of the wall-to-fluid heat fluxes to provide insight into the inner fluid dynamics of the device. The same methodology of [23] was therefore adopted in [24] for the study of the Space PHPs at different orientations and condenser temperatures under standard gravity. Here, results on heat flux amplitudes and dominant fluid oscillation frequencies were presented. The method of [23] was extended by Iwata et al. [25] to the study of a tubular micro-PHP made of stainless-steel. IR acquisitions were carried out within the condenser section, cooled by free convection with air. Conclusions on the fluid oscillations and heat flux amplitudes were drawn. Lastly, a novel method, similarly based on the IHCP resolution approach, was proposed by Pagliarini et al. [26] for wall-to-fluid heat flux estimation in an FPPHP made of copper. Statistical reductions were performed on the resulting wall-to-fluid heat flux amplitudes. In [27], the figures of merit referred to fluid oscillations and transverse conduction in the same FPPHP device, analyzed through the same experimental and post-processing approach in [26], were collected and presented. The outcomes resulting from each experimental campaign were capable of quantitatively outlining the inner thermo-fluid dynamics of the investigated systems, even without any presence of transparent inserts for direct fluid visualizations. The main device specifics, test conditions, and quantified phenomena are listed in Table 1.
Due to the greatly promising results of wall-to-fluid heat fluxes for PHP descriptions, local heat transfer quantities are believed to be a straightforward and powerful tool for the generalization and prediction of the PHP operation regardless the adopted layout, the manufacturing material, the working fluid, or the operating condition. Hence, the aim of the present work is to disclose the potentiality of wall-to-fluid heat fluxes locally exchanged at the wall–fluid interfaces for PHP working behavior prediction through the comparison of results provided by the previous literature [24,25,26,27], available, to the authors’ best knowledge, for metallic devices, which are of greater manufacturing and application appeal for the general industry.

2. Materials and Methods

In the present section, the methodologies adopted in the previous works are briefly outlined. The steps belonging to the experimental procedure are summarized below:
  • Step heat loads are provided to the evaporator, the investigated device under specific working conditions (e.g., specific orientation, condenser temperature, etc.).
  • When pseudo-steady-state conditions are reached, IR videos are taken at the outer wall surface of the section of interest (either the adiabatic section or the condenser, depending on the considered device).
  • For every framed channel, temperature distributions are collected by assuming negligible temperature variations along the circumferential direction; this results in N × M temperature distributions, with N being the number of pixels along the axial coordinate of each tube and M the number of time instants (frames).
  • The temperature distributions referring to every device channel are therefore processed by means of the IHCP resolution approach, resulting in wall-to-fluid heat flux distributions qn (for the n-th channel). For the sake of brevity and clarity, the theoretical formulations assumed by the IHCP resolution method for the geometries under investigation are left to the reader ([23] for tubular layouts, [26] for FPPHP layouts).
  • The wall-to-fluid heat fluxes are processed through different reduction approaches; statistical approaches are used to provide figures of merit for all the collected wall-to-fluid heat flux distributions, while the wavelet method is adopted to assess heat flux oscillation frequencies, which directly reflect fluid oscillation frequencies.
  • The above steps are replicated for every heat load step to the evaporator/all-test conditions.
All the steps referring to the experimental approach, the post-processing procedure, and the data reduction are overviewed in the flowchart in Figure 1.
The evaluated heat fluxes were proven to be inherently linked to the fluid motion, even though no information could be obtained in terms of liquid–vapor displacement due to thermal inertia and the overall thermal properties of the walls [23]. In the following subsections, the reduction methods adopted to estimate meaningful figures of merit aimed at comparing the results of previous experimental campaigns on different devices are described.

2.1. Statistical Reduction

Concerning statistical approaches, the coefficient of variation cvt was proposed to quantify heat flux variations over time. In particular, cvt is defined, for the n-th device channel, as follows [23]:
cvt n = i = 1 N std q n i , t = 1 , , M mean q n i , t = 1 , , M N
where N and M are the space (axial) and time dimensions of the heat flux maps, respectively, std is the standard deviation operator, mean is the arithmetic mean operator, i is the space coordinate, and t is the time coordinate. Of note, N reflects the number of pixels in the thermographic acquisitions along the channels’ axis, while M reflects the number of frames in the IR videos (function of the adopted sampling frequency and videos length). To better highlight space and time discretization of the wall-to-fluid heat flux maps adopted in Equation (1), a representative scheme is shown in Figure 2.
Specifically, cvt was proven to provide quantitative pieces of information in terms of working regime detection, thus assuming different values during the start-up, intermittent flow, and full activation phases of the PHPs [24,26]. This represents an important improvement with respect to typical working regime identifications, which usually rely on qualitative observations of wall temperature trends at the evaporator and/or condenser sections [2,28,29].
By averaging cvtn for the overall system, i.e., for every device channel, a new meaningful coefficient, cvtav, is defined, quantifying differences in terms of thermofluidic interactions between the fluid and the channel wall in the whole PHP:
cvt av = n = 1 num c vt n num
where num represents the total number of PHP channels.
Additionally, q80 was proposed to statistically describe the wall-to-fluid heat flux magnitude in the overall devices. Such a quantity was computed as the 80th percentile [30] of the absolute value of all the estimated heat flux values. In particular, the 80th percentile of all the absolute heat flux values q = { | q 1 i = 1 , , N , t = 1 , , M | ; ; | q n u m i = 1 , , N , t = 1 , , M | } represents the q * =   q n * ( i * , t * ) value below which the 80% of q falls. All the high amplitude, sporadic peaks (i.e., belonging to the remaining 20% of q ) are therefore neglected from the analyses since they are considered meaningless in terms of statistical description of the device operation [23].

2.2. Frequency Analysis

Different techniques have been used, in the past literature, to perform frequency analyses on PHP fluid oscillations. The most typical method is represented by the fast Fourier transform, firstly applied by Jong-Soo et al. [31] to the fluid pressure signals in the evaporator section of a PHP presenting rectangular channels and filled with R-142b. The Hilbert–Huang transform [32,33] and the time strip technique [34] have also been proposed for the study of fluid oscillation frequencies. However, while some works were able to quantify PHP fluid oscillation features by assessing dominant fluid oscillation frequencies [29,35,36], others failed in such a task by means of the mentioned methods [37,38], although the operation of the investigated devices was clearly confirmed by either direct fluid visualizations or temperature/equivalent thermal resistance trends. Perna et al. [39] took advantage of fluid pressure signals and collected close to the evaporator and condenser sections of a multi-turn pulsating heat pipe filled with FC-72 to successfully quantify fluid oscillation frequencies by means of the wavelet method. In the work, the authors underlined the superiority of the wavelet-based method with respect to fast Fourier transform. In fact, the wavelet transform allows, on one hand, dynamically increased frequency resolution at lower frequencies and greater time resolution at higher frequencies. On the other hand, it provides smoother and better mathematically defined power spectra than classical Fourier spectra. Very good agreement between the dominant frequencies computed by the wavelet method on pressure signals and the thermographic data on the outer wall of the device was shown by Pagliarini et al. [23], who thus proved the full suitability of the IR data as inputs for the wavelet method for PHPs. Hence, frequency analyses were carried out by adopting, among other analysis tools, the wavelet method. Specifically, the Morlet wavelet for the dimensionless time η was used [40]:
ψ ( η ) = 1 π e η 2 2 e i ω 0 η
Time distributions qn(t) of the wall-to-fluid heat fluxes were thus considered as inputs for the method, which was based on the following continuous formulation [41]:
W ψ a , τ = 1 a q n ( t ) ψ * t τ a dt
where a and τ are the wavelet scale and time shift, respectively, and the superscript * denotes the complex conjugate. The peaks in the power spectra provided by the wavelet method were referred to as dominant oscillation frequencies of the fluid oscillation phenomena fD [39]. The average dominant fluid oscillation frequency fD,av related to the whole device was therefore computed as:
f D , av = n = 1 num f D , n num

3. Results

3.1. Repeatable Working Regime Detection

The first meaningful result of the comparative study refers to the working regime detection in every considered PHP device. To underline the strength and validity of such a coefficient for all the tested devices, the values of cvtav, computed during the intermittent flow regime and the full activation, are shown for the Space PHP, the FPPHP and the micro-PHP in Figure 3. For the sake of comparison, the only vertical Bottom Heated Mode (BHM, evaporator placed below the condenser) was considered for all the PHPs, while the power input given to the evaporator was normalized with respect to the maximum provided heat loads Qlim, equal to 190 W, 5 W, and 250 W for the Space PHPs, the micro-PHPs, and the FPPHPs, respectively. To note, all the Qlim values are not to be intended as maximum heat loads provided to the evaporator (i.e., operational limit of the devices), but they rather reflect the safety limits chosen to prevent damage to the operators and to the experimental set-ups (the threshold evaporator temperature chosen is equal to 105 °C). In addition, the here reported data on the Space PHPs are referred to a condenser temperature equal to 20 °C (same set-point temperature given during the FPPHP investigation) to remove from the analysis any possible discrepancies due to viscous effects [24].
Here, it is interesting to notice that, despite the analyzed device, the intermittent flow is characterized by higher peaks in the cvtav, i.e., by stronger heat flux variations over time in the overall device when heat load promotes the highest intermittency of the fluid motion. Concerning the Space PHPs and the FPPHPs, cvtav increases up to a peak value at almost the same normalized power input to the evaporator (Q/Qlim ≈ 0.35). The values assumed by these peaks differ by about 10%. In the micro-PHPs, cvtav instead presents a monotonically decreasing trend from lower to higher normalized power inputs. Specifically, cvtav assumes, within the intermittent flow, a high value at low Q/Qlim, contrary to what was observed for the other devices. This may be due to two main factors: a different observation section (condenser, Table 1), which could result in different observed heat flux variations, and a different intermittent flow pattern occurring in micro-devices. Nonetheless, during the full activation (Q/Qlim > 0.42), all devices exhibit a stabilization of the cvtav around 73%, suggesting that such a value could be a significant reference for the full activation identification and prediction for every PHP geometry, regardless of the observation window and the cooling method.

3.2. Trends in the q80 Values

Another fruitful remark was achieved by comparing the values assumed by q80 in the Space PHPs and the FPPHPs. These two devices were specifically chosen for comparison since the adiabatic section was investigated during pseudo-steady state conditions for both PHP layouts (Table 1). Such a comparison is shown in Figure 4. Here, the vertical BHM orientation was not considered since it promoted net fluid circulation inside the only Space PHP [24], with consequently different thermofluidic interactions between the working fluid and the device wall with respect to the FFPHPs.
Trends referring to both devices show an increase in q80 both during the intermittent flow (from 20 W up to about 100 W) and the full activation regions. Such an increase in the heat load was therefore modeled by means of a linear fit of the data. Specifically, the curve which best fitted (in a least-squares sense) the data is defined by q80 = 27.3 Q, with R2 = 0.974. The fit was forced to pass through the origin for physical reasons (q80 = 0 W/m2 when no heat is given to the evaporator). The provided correlation can accurately describe the local wall-to-fluid interactions over the entire PHP operation, suggesting that, in the horizontal orientation, the amplitude of heat flux peaks does not depend either on the considered geometry or on the considered working regime. Nonetheless, it has to be stressed that the similar local heat transfer behavior experienced in both devices might also be due to a particular combination of beneficial and negative effects of the tilt angle and working fluid on the devices. In fact, on one hand, the horizontal orientation undermines the FPPHP operation in a more severe way than the tubular layouts due to stronger conductive phenomena occurring in the solid domain, which leads to a higher degree of thermalization and consequent lower pressure gradients for the fluid motion between the evaporator and the condenser [4]. On the other hand, the aqueous mixture employed during the FPPHP investigation enhances the device thermal performance [42], eventually leading to comparable local heat transfer within the adiabatic section in both the FPPHPs and the Space PHPs. The q80 values and the provided model as a function of the heat load could lead to a prediction for the PHP operation in the horizontal orientation, along with a proper validation of the existing numerical models in terms of local heat transfer quantities for different PHP devices.

3.3. Stabilization of the Dominant Fluid Oscillation Frequency

Finally, the dominant fluid oscillation frequencies evaluated in the micro-PHPs and in the FPPHPs during the full activation were compared in the vertical BHM orientation. The Space PHP was not here taken into account due to the onset of circulatory rather than oscillatory flows [24].
The fD,av values are shown in Figure 5 as a function of the dimensionless heat load. Here, as long as the power input to the evaporator increases, the fluid oscillation frequency tends to stabilize, regardless of the operating conditions, the geometry, the material, or the working fluid. Such a common trend opens to an interesting observation about the PHP flow pattern transition. Specifically, at high heat loads, a stabilization of the dominant fluid oscillation frequency could result in a saturation of heat transferable to the condenser, thus enabling local dry-out phenomena at the evaporator. The formation of dry spots could therefore promote the onset of annular flows, at least in some channels. This suggests that the prediction of different PHP heat transfer processes might be achieved by focusing on transitions in the fluid oscillation frequency trends at different normalized heat loads.

4. Conclusions

Results obtained by previous investigations of different PHP devices were compared with the aim of understanding the potentialities of wall-to-fluid heat flux quantities for the generalization and prediction of PHP working behaviors. In fact, the lack of effective predictive models represents a crucial gap in the literature and a phenomenological gap, especially for large-scale, industrial applications. The present comparative study focused on three different PHP layouts: a tubular PHP (Space PHP) [24], an FPPHP [26,27], and a micro-PHP (tubular channels) [25]. Two statistical quantities were considered, namely the cvt and the q80, along with the dominant fluid oscillation frequencies fD estimated by means of the wavelet method. The main outcomes of the present investigation are summarized below:
  • The cvtav coefficient succeeds in generalizing the working regime identification in different PHP layouts under the BHM orientation. In fact, it assumes comparable values for all the studied configurations, especially during the full activation phase;
  • When different devices (Space PHPs and FPPHPs) tested in the horizontal orientation are compared, the correlation between the 80th percentile of the wall-to-fluid heat fluxes and the heat load provided to the systems follows a linear trend of the form q80 = 27.3 Q;
  • Regardless of the considered device, the dominant fluid oscillation frequencies tend to stabilize at high heat loads in vertical BHM operation, suggesting that the systems face a saturation of the heat transfer capabilities from the evaporator to the condenser due to intrinsic flow motion limitations. This could lead to the occurrence of local dry-outs at the evaporator section, resulting in the onset of annular flows.
In conclusion, the present comparative study suggests that PHP thermal behavior can be partially generalized by the reduction in wall-to-fluid heat fluxes, regardless of the geometry or the operating settings. It has to be stressed that the term “generalization” cannot fully and ultimately reflect, in the light of the proposed results, the real capabilities of wall-to-fluid heat flux reductions in terms of predicting PHP thermal behaviors. Hence, by “partially generalized”, the authors express reasonable reservations on the full effectiveness of generalizing the thermofluidic response of any kind of PHP device through the given tools, leaving the question, “Are local heat transfer quantities useful for predicting the working behavior of different Pulsating Heat Pipe layouts?”, partially open to future, in-depth investigations. Nonetheless, despite the number of available data and analyzed devices being relatively small due to a lack of works experimentally dealing with heat flux estimation in PHPs, the results exhibit clear trends that imply a concrete possibility of adopting local heat transfer features to achieve a more general quantification of PHP thermal behavior with respect to commonly employed figures of merit, such as equivalent thermal resistances. The obtained remarks can be therefore used not only as benchmarks for the improvement of PHP numerical models but also to advance the generalization and prediction of PHP thermal response, which is still hampered by the highly complex physics underlying such devices.

Author Contributions

Methodology, L.P.; Formal analysis, L.P.; Writing—original draft, L.P.; Writing—review & editing, L.P.; Supervision, F.B.; Funding acquisition, F.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the European Space Agency (ESA) through the grant 4000128640/19/NL/PG/pt, ESA MAP project TOPDESS. The authors would also like to acknowledge financial support from PNRR MUR project ECS_00000033_ECOSISTER.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Zhang, Y.; Faghri, A. Advances and unsolved issues in pulsating heat pipes. Heat Transf. Eng. 2008, 29, 20–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Marengo, M.; Nikolayev, V.S. Pulsating Heat Pipes: Experimental Analysis, Design and Applications. In Encyclopedia of Two-Phase Heat Transfer and Flow IV: Modeling Methodologies, Boiling of CO₂, and Micro-Two-Phase Cooling Volume 1: Modeling of Two-Phase Flows and Heat Transfer; World Scientific Publishing: Singapore, 2018; pp. 1–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, X.; Chen, Y. Fluid flow and heat transfer in flat-plate oscillating heat pipe. Energy Build 2014, 75, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ayel, V.; Slobodeniuk, M.; Bertossi, R.; Romestant, C.; Bertin, Y. Flat plate pulsating heat pipes: A review on the thermohydraulic principles, thermal performances and open issues. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2021, 197, 117200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Su, Z.; Hu, Y.; Zheng, S.; Wu, T.; Liu, K.; Zhu, M.; Huang, J. Recent advances in visualization of pulsating heat pipes: A review. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2023, 221, 119867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Faghri, A. Heat pipes: Review, opportunities and challenges. Front. Heat Pipes FHP 2014, 5, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Barua, H.; Ali, M.; Nuruzzaman, M.; Islam, M.Q.; Feroz, C.M. Effect of Filling Ratio on Heat Transfer Characteristics and Performance of a Closed Loop Pulsating Heat Pipe. Procedia Eng. 2013, 56, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Charoensawan, P.; Terdtoon, P. Thermal performance of horizontal closed-loop oscillating heat pipes. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2008, 28, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Patel, V.M.; Gaurav; Mehta, H.B. Influence of working fluids on startup mechanism and thermal performance of a closed loop pulsating heat pipe. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 110, 1568–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rudresha, S.; Babu, E.R.; Thejaraju, R. Experimental investigation and influence of filling ratio on heat transfer performance of a pulsating heat pipe. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2023, 38, 101649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gu, J.; Kawaji, M.; Futamata, R. Effects of Gravity on the Performance of Pulsating Heat Pipes. J. Thermophys. Heat Trans. 2004, 18, 370–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lim, J.; Kim, S.J. Fabrication and experimental evaluation of a polymer-based flexible pulsating heat pipe. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 156, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Burban, G.; Ayel, V.; Alexandre, A.; Lagonotte, P.; Bertin, Y.; Romestant, C. Experimental investigation of a pulsating heat pipe for hybrid vehicle applications. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2013, 50, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pietrasanta, L.; Postorino, G.; Perna, R.; Mameli, M.; Filippeschi, S. A pulsating heat pipe embedded radiator: Thermal-vacuum characterisation in the pre-cryogenic temperature range for space applications. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2020, 19, 100622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rittidech, S.; Terdtoon, P.; Murakami, M.; Kamonpet, P.; Jompakdee, W. Correlation to predict heat transfer characteristics of a closed-end oscillating heat pipe at normal operating condition. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2003, 23, 497–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khandekar, S.; Charoensawan, P.; Groll, M.; Terdtoon, P. Closed loop pulsating heat pipes Part B: Visualization and semi-empirical modeling. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2003, 23, 2021–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Qu, J.; Wang, Q. Experimental study on the thermal performance of vertical closed-loop oscillating heat pipes and correlation modeling. Appl. Energy 2013, 112, 1154–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, X.; Yan, Y.; Meng, X.; Chen, G. A general method to predict the performance of closed pulsating heat pipe by artificial neural network. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 157, 113761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jokar, A.; Godarzi, A.A.; Saber, M.; Shafii, M.B. Simulation and optimization of a pulsating heat pipe using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Heat Mass Transf. 2016, 52, 2437–2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ahmadi, M.H.; Tatar, A.; Nazari, M.A.; Ghasempour, R.; Chamkha, A.J.; Yan, W.-M. Applicability of connectionist methods to predict thermal resistance of pulsating heat pipes with ethanol by using neural networks. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2018, 126, 1079–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kholi, F.K.; Park, S.; Yang, J.S.; Ha, M.Y.; Min, J.K. A detailed review of pulsating heat pipe correlations and recent advances using Artificial Neural Network for improved performance prediction. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2023, 207, 124010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jo, J.; Kim, J.; Kim, S.J. Experimental investigations of heat transfer mechanisms of a pulsating heat pipe. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 181, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pagliarini, L.; Cattani, L.; Bozzoli, F.; Mameli, M.; Filippeschi, S.; Rainieri, S.; Marengo, M. Thermal characterization of a multi-turn pulsating heat pipe in microgravity conditions: Statistical approach to the local wall-to-fluid heat flux. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2021, 169, 120930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pagliarini, L.; Cattani, L.; Mameli, M.; Filippeschi, S.; Bozzoli, F.; Rainieri, S. Global and local heat transfer behaviour of a three-dimensional Pulsating Heat Pipe: Combined effect of the heat load, orientation and condenser temperature. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2021, 195, 117144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Iwata, N.; Bozzoli, F.; Pagliarini, L.; Cattani, L.; Vocale, P.; Malavasi, M.; Rainieri, S. Characterization of thermal behavior of a micro pulsating heat pipe by local heat transfer investigation. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2022, 196, 123203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pagliarini, L.; Cattani, L.; Slobodeniuk, M.; Ayel, V.; Romestant, C.; Bozzoli, F.; Rainieri, S. Novel Infrared Approach for the Evaluation of Thermofluidic Interactions in a Metallic Flat-Plate Pulsating Heat Pipe. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 11682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pagliarini, L.; Cattani, L.; Ayel, V.; Slobodeniuk, M.; Romestant, C.; Bozzoli, F. Thermographic Investigation on Fluid Oscillations and Transverse Interactions in a Fully Metallic Flat-Plate Pulsating Heat Pipe. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 6351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cui, X.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Z.; Shun, S. Combination study of operation characteristics and heat transfer mechanism for pulsating heat pipe. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 65, 394–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khandekar, S.; Gautam, A.P.; Sharma, P.K. Multiple quasi-steady states in a closed loop pulsating heat pipe. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2009, 48, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Everitt, B.S.; Skrondal, A. The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kim, J.-S.; Bui, N.H.; Jung, H.-S.; Lee, W.-H. The study on pressure oscillation and heat transfer characteristics of oscillating capillary tube heat pipe. KSME Int. J. 2003, 17, 1533–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fairley, J.D.; Thompson, S.M.; Anderson, D. Time–frequency analysis of flat-plate oscillating heat pipes. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2015, 91, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Peng, H.; Pai, P.F.; Ma, H. Nonlinear thermomechanical finite-element modeling, analysis and characterization of multi-turn oscillating heat pipes. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2014, 69, 424–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Spinato, G.; Borhani, N.; Thome, J.R. Understanding the self-sustained oscillating two-phase flow motion in a closed loop pulsating heat pipe. Energy 2015, 90, 889–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Monroe, J.G.; Aspin, Z.S.; Fairley, J.D.; Thompson, S.M. Analysis and comparison of internal and external temperature measurements of a tubular oscillating heat pipe. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2017, 84, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chi, R.-G.; Chung, W.-S.; Rhi, S.-H. Thermal Characteristics of an Oscillating Heat Pipe Cooling System for Electric Vehicle Li-Ion Batteries. Energies 2018, 11, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Karthikeyan, V.K.; Ramachandran, K.; Pillai, B.C.; Brusly Solomon, A. Understanding thermo-fluidic characteristics of a glass tube closed loop pulsating heat pipe: Flow patterns and fluid oscillations. Heat Mass Transf. 2015, 51, 1669–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Takawale, A.; Abraham, S.; Sielaff, A.; Mahapatra, P.S.; Pattamatta, A.; Stephan, P. A comparative study of flow regimes and thermal performance between flat plate pulsating heat pipe and capillary tube pulsating heat pipe. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 149, 613–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Perna, R.; Abela, M.; Mameli, M.; Mariotti, A.; Pietrasanta, L.; Marengo, M.; Filippeschi, S. Flow characterization of a pulsating heat pipe through the wavelet analysis of pressure signals. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 171, 115128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lilly, J.M. Element analysis: A wavelet-based method for analysing time-localized events in noisy time series. Proc. R. Soc. A 2017, 473, 20160776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Mameli, M.; Marengo, M.; Khandekar, S. Local heat transfer measurement and thermo-fluid characterization of a pulsating heat pipe. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2014, 75, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ayel, V.; Slobodeniuk, M.; Bertossi, R.; Karmakar, A.; Martineau, F.; Romestant, C.; Bertin, Y.; Khandekar, S. Thermal performances of a flat-plate pulsating heat pipe tested with water, aqueous mixtures and surfactants. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2022, 178, 107599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Main steps performed during experimental investigations.
Figure 1. Main steps performed during experimental investigations.
Fluids 09 00107 g001
Figure 2. Scheme for space and time discretization of heat flux maps.
Figure 2. Scheme for space and time discretization of heat flux maps.
Fluids 09 00107 g002
Figure 3. Comparison between different devices in terms of cvtav of the wall-to-fluid heat flux (vertical BHM orientation), Space PHP [25]; Micro-PHP [26]; FPPHP [27].
Figure 3. Comparison between different devices in terms of cvtav of the wall-to-fluid heat flux (vertical BHM orientation), Space PHP [25]; Micro-PHP [26]; FPPHP [27].
Fluids 09 00107 g003
Figure 4. q80 against the heat load to the evaporator for the Space PHPs and the FPPHPs, Space PHP [25]; FPPHP [27].
Figure 4. q80 against the heat load to the evaporator for the Space PHPs and the FPPHPs, Space PHP [25]; FPPHP [27].
Fluids 09 00107 g004
Figure 5. fD,av as a function of dimensionless heat load (full activation of the devices), Micro-PHP [26]; FPPHP [28].
Figure 5. fD,av as a function of dimensionless heat load (full activation of the devices), Micro-PHP [26]; FPPHP [28].
Fluids 09 00107 g005
Table 1. Test conditions and quantified phenomena.
Table 1. Test conditions and quantified phenomena.
Studied DeviceManufacturing MaterialWorking FluidCooling MethodSection of Interest 1Quantified Phenomena
Tubular PHP (Space PHP) [23,24]AluminumMethanolPrescribed temperature (Peltier cell array)Adiabatic section
  • Thermal performance
  • Heat flux amplitude against power input
  • Working regimes
  • Flow modes
  • Average fluid velocity (circulatory flow on ground)
  • Oscillation frequency (microgravity)
Micro-PHP [25]Stainless-steelR134aFree convectionCondenser
  • Thermal performance
  • Working regimes
  • Oscillation frequency
  • Flow modes
FPPHP [26,27]CopperWater/ethanol mixture (20% w.)Prescribed temperature (copper heat exchanger)Adiabatic section
  • Thermal performance
  • Heat flux amplitude against power input
  • Working regimes
  • Oscillation frequency and transverse conduction
1 Device section over which IR acquisitions were carried out during pseudo-steady state.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pagliarini, L.; Bozzoli, F. Are Local Heat Transfer Quantities Useful for Predicting the Working Behavior of Different Pulsating Heat Pipe Layouts? A Comparative Study. Fluids 2024, 9, 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9050107

AMA Style

Pagliarini L, Bozzoli F. Are Local Heat Transfer Quantities Useful for Predicting the Working Behavior of Different Pulsating Heat Pipe Layouts? A Comparative Study. Fluids. 2024; 9(5):107. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9050107

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pagliarini, Luca, and Fabio Bozzoli. 2024. "Are Local Heat Transfer Quantities Useful for Predicting the Working Behavior of Different Pulsating Heat Pipe Layouts? A Comparative Study" Fluids 9, no. 5: 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9050107

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop