Next Article in Journal
Experimental and Numerical Study of Film Boiling Around a Small Nickel Sphere
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Flow-Induced Shear in a Porous Microfluidic Slide: CFD Analysis and Experimental Investigation
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Machine Learning Approach to Volume Tracking in Multiphase Flow Simulations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Hybrid Symbolic Regression and Machine Learning Approaches for Modeling Gas Lift Well Performance

Mewbourne School of Petroleum and Geological Engineering, Mewbourne College of Earth and Energy, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fluids 2025, 10(7), 161; https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10070161
Submission received: 22 May 2025 / Revised: 19 June 2025 / Accepted: 20 June 2025 / Published: 21 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Multiphase Flow Simulation with Machine Learning)

Abstract

Proper determination of the bottomhole pressure in a gas lift well is essential to enhance production, tackle operating concerns, and use the least amount of gas. Mechanistic models, empirical correlation, and hybrid models are usually limited by the requirements for calibration, large amounts of inputs, or limited scope of work. Through this study, sixteen well-tested machine learning (ML) models, such as genetic programming-based symbolic regression and neural networks, are developed and studied to accurately predict flowing BHP at the perforation depth, using a dataset from 304 gas lift wells. The dataset covers a variety of parameters related to reservoirs, completions, and operations. After careful preprocessing and analysis of features, the models were prepared and tested with cross-validation, random sampling, and blind testing. Among all approaches, using the L-BFGS optimizer on the neural network gave the best predictions, with an R2 of 0.97, low errors, and better accuracy than other ML methods. Upon using SHAP analysis, it was found that the injection point depth, tubing depth, and fluid flow rate are the main determining factors. Further using the model on 30 unseen additional wells confirmed its reliability and real-world utility. This study reveals that ML prediction for BHP is an effective alternative for traditional models and pressure gauges, as it is simpler, quicker, more accurate, and more economical.
Keywords: gas lift wells; machine learning models; symbolic regression; Bottomhole Pressure Prediction; neural networks gas lift wells; machine learning models; symbolic regression; Bottomhole Pressure Prediction; neural networks

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nashed, S.; Moghanloo, R. Hybrid Symbolic Regression and Machine Learning Approaches for Modeling Gas Lift Well Performance. Fluids 2025, 10, 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10070161

AMA Style

Nashed S, Moghanloo R. Hybrid Symbolic Regression and Machine Learning Approaches for Modeling Gas Lift Well Performance. Fluids. 2025; 10(7):161. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10070161

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nashed, Samuel, and Rouzbeh Moghanloo. 2025. "Hybrid Symbolic Regression and Machine Learning Approaches for Modeling Gas Lift Well Performance" Fluids 10, no. 7: 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10070161

APA Style

Nashed, S., & Moghanloo, R. (2025). Hybrid Symbolic Regression and Machine Learning Approaches for Modeling Gas Lift Well Performance. Fluids, 10(7), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10070161

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop