# Meridional and Zonal Wavenumber Dependence in Tracer Flux in Rossby Waves

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Materials and Methods

#### 2.1. Rossby Waves

#### 2.2. Fluid and Tracer Flux

- allows for the disturbance to have any time-variation;
- explicitly quantifies the flux as a function of time;
- does not care whether manifolds intersect zero times, a finite number of times, or an infinite number of times;
- captures both simple and complicated (chaotic) forms of transport; and
- works for compressible two-dimensional flows (geophysical fluid might need to satisfy volume preservation, and so when observing behavior on two-dimensional sheets (e.g., isopycnals), area-preservation need not be satisfied since the isopycnals can compress towards one another).

## 3. Results

#### 3.1. Formulas for Flux

#### 3.2. Optimal Wavenumbers

#### 3.3. Flux for Wave Packets

## 4. Discussion and Conclusions

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## Appendix A. Relationship of Flux Definition to Other Methods

**Relationship to relative positioning of manifolds at each time:**The flux Formula (16), in the situation in which the disturbance is small, has a connection with the width of the chaotic zone. This is because flux occurs when the distance between ${y}_{s}\left(t\right)$ and ${y}_{u}\left(t\right)$ is large, and exactly this distance can be thought of as the width of the zone. Moreover, there is a dichotomy: viewing the width as a function of time at a fixed gate location (which is the viewpoint here), is equivalent to thinking of the width as a function of gate location at fixed time [41,51]. The reason for this is that any intersection patterns that exist at a fixed time, will eventually have to move through a fixed gate when time is evolved. To state this more precisely, let ℓ be a signed arc length along Γ, chosen symmetrically such that the northernmost point of Γ, $\left(\pi /2,\widehat{y}\right)$ has $\ell =0$, and $\ell <0$ for $x<\pi /2$. Then, the displacement between the stable and the unstable manifold at a location ℓ, at time t, measured in the direction normal to Γ, can be represented by [41,87]

**Relationship to chaotic transport:**The condition ${c}_{kl}\ne c$ is equivalent to that stated for the flux to be nonzero in (25). In this case, ${M}_{kl}$ is genuinely sinusoidal. This means it has infinitely many zeros. In view of the dichotomy discussed previously, if considering the picture at fixed time, this implies that the stable and unstable manifolds intersect infinitely often. Determining a zero of a Melnikov function in this way is one of the few approaches for proving that a system has chaotic transport, e.g., [46,47]. The focus in these articles was to prove that the system was chaotic, which occurs when the Melnikov function has simple zeros in time-periodic flows. Technically, however, this furnishes a proof of chaos only in the homoclinic instance in which the two anchoring points are the same; in this case each manifold can be established to wrap around the homoclinic loop, intersecting the other manifold infinitely many times, and re-enter a region arbitrarily close to itself once again. This is a crucial ingredient in the proof of the Smale-Birkhoff theorem [79], one of few tools for proving the existence of chaotic transport. Since this situation is of a heteroclinic manifold, with $\mathbf{a}\left(t\right)$ and $\mathbf{b}\left(t\right)$ being different, the Smale-Birkhoff theorem does not directly apply. In practice, though, the fact that the form (26) implies infinitely many intersections between the stable and unstable manifolds usually does result in chaotic transport between the eddy and the jet. This is because the intersection regions between them (the lobes) must stretch without bound when approaching the ends according to (A1), and the confinement of these lobes which is ensured by the fact that the line $y=0$ is invariant for the stream function (21). Thus, stretching and folding do occur in this situation, with intersection regions eventually forced to re-enter areas from which they left.

**Relationship to lobe areas:**If ${c}_{kl}\ne c$, the amplitude ${A}_{kl}$ has a relationship to the lobes generated when viewing the perturbed system in terms of a Poincaré map in the standard approach. If ${\psi}_{\mathrm{pert}}$ is time-sinusoidal, these lobes have equal areas, and the area of each lobe can be obtained by integrating the flux function between adjacent zeros [39,52], which in this case gives

**Different gate location:**What if the gate were chosen at a different location? In this case, it can be shown [39,41] that the leading-order flux function ${M}_{kl}\left(t\right)$ simply acquires a translation. In other words, this can be accomodateded by a shift in the value of the phase ${\varphi}_{kl}$. Importantly, this has no bearing on the amplitude ${A}_{kl}$.

**A measure of fluid flux:**In view of the above discussion, the amplitude of the flux function, ${A}_{kl}$ is proposed as an appropriate quantifier of the time-varying flux. This makes sense from (26), with the added observation that it is independent of the location at which the gate was positioned. Moreover, it arises naturally from the concept of the average flux, while explicitly accounting for the time-variation in a sensible way. Thus, ${A}_{kl}$ is an excellent flux measure, consistent with either the lobe dynamics and average flux approach, or the continuous-time approach used here, if ${c}_{kl}\ne c$.

**What if**${c}_{kl}=c$

**?**Then, the disturbance has no unsteadiness, and so an initial conclusion that can be reached is that flux function is independent of time. If it is a non-zero constant, this means that the stable and unstable manifolds do not intersect. This would allow for a channel to open up, and uni-directional flux will occur between the eddy and the jet (in one direction, depending on this sign of this constant). Uni-directional flux can certainly happen in incompressible geophysically-relevant flows, e.g., Kelvin-Stuart cats-eye flows [37,41], or in kinematical eddies [38], but in these situations there is dissipation due to diffusion or viscosity, and hence the flow is unsteady. This allows for incompressibility to be preserved in the system despite the uni-directional leaking of fluid (from inside the eddy, say), by the stable/unstable manifolds which bound the eddy getting closer and thereby enclosing lesser area as time progresses. In the case examined in this article under the condition ${c}_{kl}=c$, however, the full flow is also steady, and therefore having such a channel open up would violate incompressibility. Therefore, if ${c}_{kl}=c$, the fluid flux must be zero; that is, the stable and unstable manifolds, which may move from their initial locations, do so in such a fashion as to still coincide. This is the reason why the flux is stated as being zero in (25) when the disturbance wavenumbers obey ${k}_{1}^{\prime 2}+{l}_{1}^{\prime 2}={k}_{0}^{\prime 2}+{l}_{0}^{\prime 2}$.

**Time-periodicity is not necessary:**The theoretical approach due to Rom-Kedar et al. [49] was the first to provide a method for quantifying a flux in unsteady flows, due to the intersection of stable and unstable manifolds. This, however, relies on the velocity field being time-periodic, which allows for the definition of a Poincaré map P which simply strobes the flow at the period of the velocity [49,51,79]. Fixed points of P, and their stable and unstable manifolds, are then the focus. Their intersections creates lobes, and the impact of P on these lobes (i.e., the idea of lobe dynamics) gives insight into transport occurring over each time-period. In their classical picture, Rom-Kedar et al. [49] show that the area of a lobe can be used as a transport measure, and in their case the lobes all have equal areas to make this unambiguous. Considerably more details on this are available in the book by Wiggins [51], and geophysical applications are plentiful [3,20,45,46,47,53,80].

**Lobes are not necessary:**The classical approach [49,51] requires there to be lobes present, created through intersecting stable and unstable manifolds. Moreover, to use a lobe area as a measure of transport, it is necessary that these lobes have equal areas. In contrast, the time-varying approach detailed in Section 2.2 does not require the stable and unstable manifolds to intersect at all. If they do not intersect—which is a distinct possibility when including the effects of dissipation in geophysical flows [37,38,41])—there are no lobes at all, and hence no “lobe dynamics”. On the other hand, a lack of intersection makes perfect sense from the perspective of Figure 3: this implies a uni-directional flux, either from the eddy to the jet, or from the jet to the eddy. The instantaneous flux may change with time, but its sign does not.

**Compressibility:**The flux definition (16) is still legitimate even if the fluid were compressible. The issue is that if the fluid were compressible there would no longer be a stream function ψ that describes the velocity; however, the flux definition remains legitimate with the (compressible) velocity inserted instead [41]. Thus, the only change that needs to be done is the replacement of $-\partial \psi /\partial y$ with the zonal velocity, whatever it happens to be. However, its usage in the compressible case requires a generalization of the standard Melnikov function [41,87].

**The Melnikov function and flux:**A pleasing theoretical issue of the instantaneous flux was developed by Balasuriya [39,81]: this flux, as a time-varying quantity that specifically measures the amount of fluid that is transported across per unit time, can be characterized to leading-order in ε exactly by the Melnikov function (for fluid applications, see [38,44,46,47,49], for theory, see [41,51,79,88]). The argument of the Melnikov function relates precisely to time, and it is precisely this that appears in (25) and (26). Thus, unlike in the quantification of lobe areas which requires an integral of the Melnikov function [49,50,51], the Melnikov function by itself can be used to quantify the flux as a function of time [39,81]. The quantity ${M}_{kl}\left(t\right)$ presented in this article is exactly such a Melnikov function, as are the expressions (38) and (40) for non-sinusoidal situations. This works under general time-dependence and also compressibility [41].

## Appendix B. Derivation of the Formula for A kl

## Appendix C. Numerical Scheme for Obtaining Stable and Unstable Manifolds

## References

- Randall, D. An Introduction to the Global Circulation of the Atmosphere; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Pedlosky, J. Geophysical Fluids Dynamics; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Pierrehumbert, R. Chaotic mixing of tracer and vorticity by modulated travelling Rossby waves. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn.
**1991**, 58, 285–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mizuta, G. Role of Rossby waves in the broadening of an eastward jet. J. Phys. Oceanogr.
**2012**, 42, 476–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Graef, F. Free and forced Rossby normal modes in a rectangular gulf of arbitrary orientation. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans
**2016**, 75, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kiladis, G. Observations of Rossby waves linked to convection over the eastern tropical Pacific. J. Atmos. Sci.
**1998**, 55, 321–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Barnes, E.; Hartmann, D. Rossby wave scales, propagation, and variability of eddy-driven jets. J. Atmos. Sci.
**2011**, 68, 2893–2908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Oruba, L.; Lapeyre, G.; Riviere, G. On the northward motion of mid-latitude cyclones in a barotropic meadering jet. J. Atmos. Sci.
**2012**, 69, 1793–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Oruba, L.; Lapeyre, G.; Riviere, G. On the poleward motion of mid-latitude cyclones in a baroclinic meandering jet. J. Atmos. Sci.
**2013**, 70, 2629–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - O’Rourke, A.; Vallis, G. Jet interaction and the influence of a minimum phase speed bound on the propagation of eddies. J. Atmos. Sci.
**2013**, 70, 2614–2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Haller, G. Lagrangian Coherent Structures. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech.
**2015**, 47, 137–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Samelson, R. Lagrangian motion, coherent structures, and lines of persistent material strain. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci.
**2013**, 5, 137–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Rypina, I.; Pratt, L.; Pullen, J.; Levin, J.; Gordon, A. Chaotic advection in an archipelago. J. Phys. Oceanogr.
**2010**, 40, 1988–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tew Kai, E.; Rossi, V.; Sudre, J.; Weirmerskirch, H.; Lopez, C.; Hernandez-Garcia, E.; Marsac, F.; Garcon, V. Top marine predators track Lagrangian coherent structures. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA
**2009**, 106, 8245–8250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Levy, M.; Jahn, O.; Dutkiewicz, S.; Follows, M.; d’Ovidio, F. The dynamical landscape of marine phytoplankton diversity. J. R. Soc. Interface
**2015**, 12, 20150481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - BozorgMagham, A.; Ross, S.; Schmale, D. Local finite-time Lyapunov exponent, local sampling and probabilistic source and destination regions. Nonlinear Proc. Geophys.
**2015**, 22, 663–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - d’Ovidio, F.; Fernandez, V.; Hernandez-Garcia, E.; Lopez, C. Mixing structures in the Mediterranean sea from finite-size Lyapunov exponents. Geophys. Res. Lett.
**2004**, 31, L17203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - d’Ovidio, F.; Isern, J.; López, C.; Hernández-García, C.; García-Ladona, E. Comparison between Eulerian diagnostics and finite-size Lyapunov exponents computed from the altimetry in the Algerian basin. Deep Sea Res.
**2009**, 56, 15–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Allshouse, M.; Peacock, T. Refining finite-time Lyapunov ridges and the challenges of classifying them. Chaos
**2015**, 25, 087410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Ngan, K.; Shepherd, T. Chaotic mixing and transport in Rossby-wave critical layers. J. Fluid Mech.
**1997**, 334, 315–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Joseph, B.; Legras, B. Relation between kinematic boundaries, stirring and barriers for the Antarctic polar vortex. J. Atmos. Sci.
**2002**, 59, 1198–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Prants, S.; Budyansky, M.; Ponomarev, V.; Uleysky, M. Lagrangian study of transport and mixing in a mesoscale eddy street. Ocean Model.
**2011**, 38, 114–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pratt, L.; Barkan, R.; Rypina, I. Scalar flux kinematics. Fluids
**2016**, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rypina, I.; Kamenkovich, I.; Berloff, P.; Pratt, L. Eddy-induced particle dispersion in the near-surface north Atlantic. J. Phys. Oceanogr.
**2012**, 42, 2206–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mezić, I.; Loire, S.; Fonoberov, V.; Hogan, P. A new mixing diagnostic and Gulf oil spill movement. Science
**2010**, 330, 486–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Mancho, A.; Small, D.; Wiggins, S.; Ide, K. Computation of stable and unstable manifolds of hyperbolic trajectories in two-dimensional, aperiodically time-dependent vector fields. Physica D
**2003**, 182, 188–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Haller, G.; Hadjighasem, A.; Farazmand, M.; Huhn, F. Defining coherent vortices objectively from the vorticity. J. Fluid Mech.
**2016**, 795, 136–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rypina, I.; Scott, S.; Pratt, L.; Brown, M. Investigating the connection between complexity of isolated trajectories and Lagrangian coherent structures. Nonlinear Proc. Geophys.
**2011**, 18, 977–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Allshouse, M.; Thiffeault, J.L. Detecting coherent structures using braids. Physica D
**2012**, 241, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Budis̆ić, M.; Thiffeault, J.L. Finite-time braiding exponents. Chaos
**2015**, 25, 087407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Ma, T.; Bollt, E. Differential geometry perspective of shape coherence and curvature evolution by finite-time nonhyperbolic splitting. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst.
**2014**, 13, 1106–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Balasuriya, S.; Kalampattel, R.; Ouellette, N. Hyperbolic neighborhoods as organizers of finite-time exponential stretching. J. Fluid Mech.
**2016**. submitted. [Google Scholar] - Froyland, G.; Horenkamp, C.; Rossi, V.; van Sebille, E. Studying an Agulhas ring’s long-term pathway and decay with finite-time coherent sets. Chaos
**2015**, 25, 083119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Froyland, G.; Stuart, R.; van Sebille, E. How well-connected is the surface of the ocean? Chaos
**2014**, 24, 0333126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Froyland, G.; Padberg, K. Almost-invariant sets and invariant manifolds – connecting probabilistic and geometric descriptions of coherent structures in flows. Physica D
**2009**, 238, 1507–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ser-Giacomi, E.; Rossi, V.; López, C.; Hernández-García, E. Flow networks: A characterization of geophysical fluid transport. Chaos
**2015**, 25, 036404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Balasuriya, S.; Jones, C.; Sandstede, B. Viscous perturbations of vorticity-conserving flows and separatrix splitting. Nonlinearity
**1998**, 11, 47–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Balasuriya, S.; Jones, C. Diffusive draining and growth of eddies. Nonlinear. Proc. Geophys.
**2001**, 8, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Balasuriya, S. Nonautonomous flows as open dynamical systems: Characterising escape rates and time-varying boundaries. In Ergodic Theory, Open Dynamics, and Coherent Structures; Bahsoun, W., Bose, C., Froyland, G., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 1–30. [Google Scholar]
- Balasuriya, S. Local stable and unstable manifolds and their control in nonautonomous finite-time flows. J. Nonlinear Sci.
**2016**, 26, 895–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Balasuriya, S. Melnikov Methods for Flow Barriers and Transport in Unsteady Flows; SIAM Press: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2016; in press. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, M.; Samelson, R. Particle motion in vorticity-conserving two-dimensional incompressible flows. Phys. Fluids
**1994**, 6, 2875–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Balasuriya, S. Gradient evolution for potential vorticity flows. Nonlinear Proc. Geophys.
**2001**, 8, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Samelson, R. Fluid exchange across a meandering jet. J. Phys. Oceanogr.
**1992**, 22, 431–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - del Castillo Negrete, D.; Morrison, P. Chaotic transport by Rossby waves in shear flow. Phys. Fluids A
**1993**, 5, 948–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Weiss, J.; Knobloch, E. Mass transport by modulated traveling waves. Phys. Rev. A
**1989**, 40, 2579–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Knobloch, E.; Weiss, J. Chaotic advection by modulated traveling waves. Phys. Rev. A
**1987**, 36, 1522–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pratt, L.; Lozier, M.; Beliakova, N. Parcel trajectories in quasigeostrophic jets: Neutral modes. J. Phys. Oceanogr.
**1995**, 25, 1451–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rom-Kedar, V.; Leonard, A.; Wiggins, S. An analytical study of transport, mixing and chaos in an unsteady vortical flow. J. Fluid Mech.
**1990**, 214, 347–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rom-Kedar, V.; Poje, A. Universal properties of chaotic transport in the presence of diffusion. Phys. Fluids
**1999**, 11, 2044–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wiggins, S. Chaotic Transport in Dynamical Systems; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Balasuriya, S. Direct chaotic flux quantification in perturbed planar flows: General time-periodicity. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst.
**2005**, 4, 282–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rypina, I.; Brown, M.; Kocak, H. Transport in an idealized three-gyre system with application to the Adriatic sea. J. Phys. Oceanogr.
**2009**, 39, 675–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rypina, I.; Brown, M.; Beron-Vera, F.; Koak, H.; Olascoaga, M.; Udovydchenkov, I. On the Lagrangian dynamics of atmospheric zonal jets and the permeability of the stratospheric polar vortex. J. Atmos. Sci.
**2007**, 64, 3595–3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Prants, S.; Budyansky, M.; Uleysky, M. Chaotic mixing and transport in a meandering jet flow. Chaos
**2006**, 16, 033117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Miller, P.; Pratt, L.; Helfrich, K.; Jones, C. Chaotic transport of mass and potential vorticity for an island recirculation. J. Phys. Oceanogr.
**2002**, 32, 80–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Malhotra, N.; Wiggins, S. Geometric structures, lobe dynamics, and Lagrangian transport in flows with aperiodic time-dependence, with applications to Rossby wave flow. J. Nonlinear Sci.
**1998**, 8, 401–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mancho, A.; Hernández-Garcia, E.; Small, D.; Wiggins, S.; Fernández, V. Lagrangian transport through an ocean front in the northwestern Mediterranean sea. J. Phys. Oceanogr.
**2008**, 28, 1222–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ide, K.; Wiggins, S. Transport induced by mean-eddy interaction: I. Theory, and relation to Lagrangian lobe dynamics. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.
**2015**, 20, 516–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kamenkovich, V.; Kamenkovich, I. On the evolution of Rossby waves, generated by wind stress in a closed basin, incoporating total mass conservation. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans
**1993**, 18, 67–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Peacock, T.; Dabiri, J. Introduction to focus issue: Lagrangian Coherent Structures. Chaos
**2010**, 20, 017501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Peacock, T.; Haller, G. Lagrangian coherent structures: The hidden skeleton of fluid flows. Phys. Today
**2013**, 66, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Berloff, P. Dynamically consistent parametrization of mesoscale eddies-Part II eddy fluxes and diffusivity from transient impulses. Fluids
**2016**, 1, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rogerson, A.; Miller, P.; Pratt, L.; Jones, C. Lagrangian motion and fluid exchange in a barotropic meandering jet. J. Phys. Oceanogr.
**1999**, 29, 2635–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shevchencko, I.; Berloff, P. Multi-layer quasi-geostrophic dynamics in eddy-resolving regimes. Ocean Model.
**2015**, 94, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Maddison, J.; Marshall, D.; Shipton, J. On the dynamical influence of ocean eddy potential vorticity fluxes. Ocean Model.
**2015**, 92, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yang, H.; Wu, L.; Shantong, S.; Zhaohui, C. Low-frequency variability of monsoon-driven circulation with application to the South China sea. J. Phys. Oceanogr.
**2015**, 45, 1632–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Enomoto, T.; Matsuda, Y. Rossby wavepacket propagation in a zonally-varying basic flow. Tellus
**1999**, 51A, 588–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Farrell, B. Optimal excitation of neutral Rossby waves. J. Atmos. Sci.
**1988**, 45, 163–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Balmforth, N.; Piccolo, C. The onset of meandering in a barotropic jet. J. Fluid Mech.
**2001**, 449, 85–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shadden, S.; Lekien, F.; Marsden, J. Definition and properties of Lagrangian coherent structures from finite-time Lyapunov exponents in two-dimensional aperiodic flows. Physica D
**2005**, 212, 271–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mathew, G.; Mezić, I.; Petzold, L. A multiscale measure for mixing. Physica D
**2005**, 211, 23–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nakamura, N. Two-dimensional mixing, edge formation, and permeability diagnosed in area coordinates. J. Atmos. Sci.
**1996**, 53, 1524–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shuckburgh, E.; Haynes, P. Diagnosing transport and mixing using a tracer-based coordinate system. Phys. Fluids
**2003**, 15, 3342–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hendricks, E.; Schubert, W. Transport and mixing in idealized barotropic hurricane-like vortices. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.
**2009**, 135, 1456–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rowe, S.; Hitchman, M. On the relationship between inertial instability, poleward momentum surges, and jet intensifications near mid-latitude cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci.
**2016**, 73, 2299–2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Held, I.; Pierrehumbert, R.; Garner, S.; Swanson, K. Surface quasi-geostrophic dynamics. J. Fluid Mech.
**1995**, 282, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bower, A. A simple kinematic mechanism for mixing fluid across a meandering jet. J. Phys. Oceanogr.
**1991**, 21, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Guckenheimer, J.; Holmes, P. Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems and Bifurcations of Vector Fields; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Samelson, R.; Wiggins, S. Lagrangian Transport in Geophysical Jets and Waves; Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Balasuriya, S. Cross-separatrix flux in time-aperiodic and time-impulsive flows. Nonlinearity
**2006**, 19, 282–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Haller, G.; Poje, A. Finite time transport in aperiodic flows. Physica D
**1998**, 119, 352–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chelton, D.; Gaube, P.; Schlax, M.; Early, J.; Samelson, R. The influence of nonlinear mesoscale eddies on oceanic chlorophyll. Science
**2011**, 334, 328–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Gaultier, L.; Djath, B.; Verron, J.; Brankart, J.M.; Brasseur, P.; Melet, A. Inversion of submesoscale patterns from a high-resolution Solomon Sea model: Feasibility assessment. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans
**2014**, 119, 4520–4541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - McIntyre, M. Potential vorticity. In Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Science, 2nd ed.; North, G., Zhang, F., Pyle, J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Hadjighasem, A.; Karrasch, D.; Teramoto, H.; Haller, G. Spectral clustering approach to Lagrangian vortex detection. Phys. Rev. E
**2016**, 93, 063107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Balasuriya, S. A tangential displacement theory for locating perturbed saddles and their manifolds. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst.
**2011**, 10, 1100–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Melnikov, V.K. On the stability of the centre for time-periodic perturbations. Trans. Mosc. Math. Soc.
**1963**, 12, 1–56. [Google Scholar] - Coppel, W.A. Dichotomies in Stability Theory; Number 629 in Lecture Notes in Mathematics; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Balasuriya, S.; Padberg-Gehle, K. Controlling the unsteady analogue of saddle stagnation points. SIAM J. Appl. Math.
**2013**, 73, 1038–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Balasuriya, S. A numerical scheme for computing stable and unstable manifolds in nonautonomous flows. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos
**2016**. submitted. [Google Scholar]

**Figure 1.**One-wave Rossby wave in the moving frame, with $-1<c<0$, where Γ (magenta curve) is the barrier between the chosen eddy and the jet.

**Figure 2.**The (

**a**) Poincaré map, and (

**b**) the time-continuous, approaches for the splitting of the eddy-jet barrier into stable (green) and unstable (red) manifolds when ${\psi}_{\mathrm{pert}}\ne 0$. The dashed blue line is Γ, the unambiguous barrier when ${\psi}_{\mathrm{pert}}=0$, and the Poincaré map is valid only under certain conditions, as explained in the text. (

**a**) Discrete (strobing) time; (

**b**) continuous time.

**Figure 3.**Intersection possibilities at three instances in time. (

**a**) Positive flux; (

**b**) zero flux; (

**c**) negative flux.

**Figure 4.**The instantaneous flux Function (26) for $l=1$, at several zonal wavenumber values: $k=4$ (blue), 6 (red) and 18 (yellow).

**Figure 5.**Dependence of amplitude ${A}_{kl}$ on the wavenumbers $(k,l)$, with the dashed blue curve corresponding to ${c}_{kl}=c$.

**Figure 6.**Zoom in to smaller wavenumbers in Figure 5.

**Figure 7.**Numerically computed stable (green) and unstable (red) manifolds at $t=0$ using $\epsilon =0.02$ and $c=-0.1868$. (

**a**) $(k,l)=(0.4,0.1)$, ${A}_{kl}=0.241$; (

**b**) $(k,l)=(6,1)$, ${A}_{kl}=0.698$; (

**c**) $(k,l)=(19,6)$, ${A}_{kl}=6.025$; (

**d**) $(k,l)=(28.8,0.79)$, ${A}_{kl}=12.766$.

**Figure 8.**Forward and backward FTLE fields at $t=0$ for identical parameter values as in Figure 7c,d, with the choice of flow-time $T=12$. (

**a**) $(k,l)=(19,6)$, forward; (

**b**) $(k,l)=(19,6)$, backward; (

**c**) $(k,l)=(28.8,0.79)$, forward; (

**d**) $(k,l)=(28.8,0.79)$, backward.

**Figure 9.**Changes to the flux amplitude when one of the parameters each in (37) is changed, with the the others kept fixed. (

**a**) ${\beta}^{\prime}\to {\beta}^{\prime}/10$; (

**b**) ${A}^{\prime}\to {A}^{\prime}/2$; (

**c**) ${k}_{0}^{\prime}\to 2{k}_{0}^{\prime}$; (

**d**) ${l}_{0}^{\prime}\to {l}_{0}^{\prime}/2$.

© 2016 by the author; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Balasuriya, S.
Meridional and Zonal Wavenumber Dependence in Tracer Flux in Rossby Waves. *Fluids* **2016**, *1*, 30.
https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids1030030

**AMA Style**

Balasuriya S.
Meridional and Zonal Wavenumber Dependence in Tracer Flux in Rossby Waves. *Fluids*. 2016; 1(3):30.
https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids1030030

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Balasuriya, Sanjeeva.
2016. "Meridional and Zonal Wavenumber Dependence in Tracer Flux in Rossby Waves" *Fluids* 1, no. 3: 30.
https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids1030030