Next Article in Journal
Coccidioidal Pulmonary Cavitation: A New Age
Next Article in Special Issue
Single-Point Nail Sampling to Diagnose Onychomycosis Caused by Non-Dermatophyte Molds: Utility of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Histopathology
Previous Article in Journal
Tackling Histoplasmosis Infection in People Living with HIV from Latin America: From Diagnostic Strategy to Public Health Solutions
Previous Article in Special Issue
High Diversity of Fusarium Species in Onychomycosis: Clinical Presentations, Molecular Identification, and Antifungal Susceptibility
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 9
Issue 5
10.3390/jof9050559
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Onychomycosis: Old and New

by
Narges Maskan Bermudez
1,
Giselle Rodríguez-Tamez
2,
Sofia Perez
1 and
Antonella Tosti
1,*
1
Dr. Philip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33125, USA
2
Dermatology Department, University Hospital “Dr. José Eleuterio González”, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey 64460, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(5), 559; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9050559
Submission received: 14 April 2023 / Revised: 5 May 2023 / Accepted: 8 May 2023 / Published: 12 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives for Superficial Fungal Infections)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Onychomycosis is a common chronic fungal infection of the nail that causes discoloration and/or thickening of the nail plate. Oral agents are generally preferred, except in the case of mild toenail infection limited to the distal nail plate. Terbinafine and itraconazole are the only approved oral therapies, and fluconazole is commonly utilized off-label. Cure rates with these therapies are limited, and resistance to terbinafine is starting to develop worldwide. In this review, we aim to review current oral treatment options for onychomycosis, as well as novel oral drugs that may have promising results in the treatment of onychomycosis.

1. Introduction

Onychomycosis is a chronic fungal infection of the nail that results in discoloration, onycholysis, and nail plate thickening. The infection most commonly occurs in the toenails and can involve any component of the nail unit, including the nail bed, nail matrix, and nail plate. Onychomycosis affects patients of all ages. However, several studies have established higher prevalence with older age [1,2,3,4]. Other risk factors include diabetes, tinea pedis, poor circulation, immunosuppression, psoriasis, Down syndrome, occlusive footwear, and obesity [5,6,7,8,9].
The worldwide prevalence of onychomycosis is estimated at 10% and accounts for up to 50% of nail diseases [10,11]. Dermatophytes are a common culprit of onychomycosis, with the species Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes responsible for 60–70% of infections [12]. Yeasts are responsible for approximately 20% of onychomycosis, and non-dermatophytes account for the remaining 10% [13,14]. Studies have demonstrated that mixed infections, non-dermatophytes, and yeasts are more prevalent than previously thought, especially in warmer climates.
Onychomycosis is challenging to treat and is associated with high recurrence rates and treatment failure. Given the limited cure rates with topical antifungals, oral antifungals may be needed in most cases. Oral treatments require lengthy duration of treatment, which poses a risk of adverse effects and drug interactions. Relapse rate can be as high as 25%, and recurrence rates can vary from 6.5% to 53% [15]. Terbinafine and itraconazole are the only approved oral therapies, but fluconazole is commonly utilized off-label. However, complete cure rates (both mycologic clearance and visually clear nails) are limited, and they can range from 35%–55% for terbinafine [16,17,18], 14–43% for itraconazole [16,17,18,19,20], and 21–48% for fluconazole [21,22]. Recently, there are reports of concerning reports of terbinafine resistance in superficial mycoses in India and Europe, and novel agents may play an important role to achieve a cure [23,24,25]. In this review, we aim to describe current treatment options, as well as novel drugs, that may have promising outcomes in onychomycosis.

2. Methods

The literature was identified by performing Medline, SCOPUS, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar database searches.

3. Clinical Presentation

Patients typically present with white-yellow nail discoloration, hyperkeratosis, onycholysis, and subungual debris. The toenails are the most frequently affected, predominantly the great toenail, with rare involvement of the fingernails [26]. Concomitant tinea pedis or plantar hyperhidrosis are usually found [27,28].
Efforts have been made to establish a clinical classification of onychomycosis. Since the first classification by Zaias [29], additional updates have been proposed [30,31,32]. The clinical classification by Hay and Baran is commonly used among clinicians due to its description of a wide range of subtypes of nail invasion (Table 1) [30].

4. Subtypes of Onychomycosis

Distal lateral subungual onychomycosis (DLSO) is the most frequent subtype of onychomycosis and occurs when fungal invasion originates from the distal or lateral undersurface of the nail plate. Clinical features include hyperkeratosis, onycholysis, and white-yellow nail discoloration [26]. However, other color changes, such as black, orange, and brown, have been reported. Additionally, dermatophytomas, which present as white, yellow, orange, or brown longitudinal streaks or patches, may also be seen as complications of dermatophyte infection [33,34].
Superficial onychomycosis (SO) is due to the fungal invasion of the upper surface of the nail plate and typically affects toenails. Clinically, it is characterized either by superficial white or black patches or transverse striae that can be scraped off. The most common etiologic agents are T. rubrum [35] and T. mentagrophytes [36]. It is often associated with interdigital tinea pedis.
Proximal subungual onychomycosis (PSO) is the result of the invasion of the inner nail plate from fungi penetrating from the proximal nail fold, predominantly by T. rubrum. Other implicated organisms include Candida [37], Aspergillus [38], and Fusarium [39]. Clinically, it presents as a white patch of the proximal nail plate, starting from the proximal nail fold or multiple transverse white bands. The superficial nail plate is normal. When paronychia is associated, Candida species or molds are commonly implicated [40]. This subtype of onychomycosis is also common among immunosuppressed individuals.
Endonyx onychomycosis (EO) is the consequence of direct invasion of the distal nail plate. It presents as a lamellar nail splitting with milky patches. The main etiologic agents are T. soudanense and T. violaceum [30,31].
Mixed pattern onychomycosis (MPO) occurs when more than one pattern of nail plate fungal infection is found within the same nail. The most common combination is DLSO with SO, or PSO with SO. A wide range of etiologic agents may be implicated (Table 1) [30].
Total dystrophic onychomycosis (TDO) is the end stage of chronic onychomycosis, mainly DLSO or PSO. Clinically, it is characterized by nail plate crumbling and thickening of the nail bed with debris [30]. The most common agents are dermatophytes (T. rubrum), as well as some molds [30].

5. Secondary Onychomycosis

This is a clinical scenario when fungal invasion occurs secondary to a non-infectious nail condition, such as trauma, psoriasis, lichen planus, etc. Clinical features of the underlying nail condition are associated with hyperkeratosis, nail discoloration, onycholysis, patches, and striae. This subtype is a common presentation, and diagnosis may be challenging.

6. Diagnosis

Clinical signs of nail thickening, yellow, white, or brown nail discoloration, onycholysis, subungual debris, and multiple nail involvement, should prompt clinicians to assess for onychomycosis. Dermoscopy findings in onychomycosis include jagged proximal edges with spikes, longitudinal striae, a ruined appearance, and longitudinal ridges along the nail bed [41]. Dermoscopy can also be used to assess for trauma or other nail disorders, such as nail psoriasis, subungual warts, and lichen planus.
Diagnosis by clinical features is not always reliable, and laboratory isolation of fungi continues to be the diagnostic gold standard. A sensitive test for onychomycosis includes nail clippings sent in formalin for histopathology and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stains and other fungal stains. Alternatively, potassium hydroxide (KOH) preparation of nail scrapings can also be performed to visualize hyphae. While both the PAS stain and KOH preparation are sensitive tests, neither method can identify specific pathogens. Fungal culture can be used for identification of pathogens; however, its sensitivity is low, and there is a risk of false-positive results due to contamination.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is an excellent diagnostic method that has high sensitivity, but false positives are common. Given that the number of mixed onychomycosis and non-dermatophyte infections are becoming more prevalent, molecular diagnosis can aid in the selection of appropriate antifungal treatment.
The presentation of onychomycosis can also help determine areas of the nails needed for the sample collection. Nail clippings should be at least 4 mm to maximize diagnostic accuracy [42]. For DLSO, samples should be taken from the nail bed in the proximal area of involvement where the concentration of hyphae will be the highest [43]. In white superficial onychomycosis (WSO), a specimen should be collected by scraping the superficial aspect of the nail with a No. 15 scalpel [8]. In PSO, the proximal nail can be obtained with a 3 mm punch of the proximal nail plate [43,44].

7. Defining a Cure

Onychomycosis studies often report the mycologic cure, clinical cure, and complete cure rates. A mycologic cure is achieved when both the culture and direct microscopy are negative after medical treatment. A clinical cure is defined as a normal appearance of the affected nail. A complete cure is defined as both negative mycology and absence of clinical signs in the nail. The goal of treatment is complete cure; however, patients often have nail abnormalities before the development of the fungal infections and will not achieve fully normal nails after treatment. In this review, we will focus primarily on complete cure rates.

8. Treatment Approach

When approaching onychomycosis treatment, the three main pharmacologic strategies include oral treatment, topical treatment, or combination therapy.
Topical treatment of onychomycosis is complicated by several factors, including limited access to the nail bed and complex pharmacologic properties needed to allow for nail plate penetration. Patients who have nail plate thickening and onycholysis particularly add to the suboptimal nature of topical drug transportation. Nail lacquers represent a unique pharmacologic property that allows for higher levels of diffusion across the nail plate as its drug concentration increases, while the solvent evaporates [45]. Leading nail lacquer products, ciclopirox 8%, amorolfine 5%, and efinaconazole 10%, have reported complete cure rates of 5.5–8.5%, 15.2–17.8%, and 15.2–25.6%, respectively [46,47,48,49,50]. Despite lower cure rates, topical monotherapy is recommended in mild toenail onychomycosis limited to the distal nail, as well as WSO. Recent data, however, show that efinaconazole can be very effective in treating onychomycosis complicated by dermatophytomas and longitudinal spikes [51,52].
While higher complete cure rates are seen in oral antifungal monotherapy than topical monotherapy, topical treatment can play a role in maintenance therapy after the completion of oral antifungal therapy. Oral therapy is generally recommended for patients with DLSO involving more than 50% of the nail, DLSO affecting more than two nails, PSO, and deep WSO [53].
Oral antifungal agents available for the treatment of toe and fingernail onychomycosis include terbinafine, itraconazole, and fluconazole. Terbinafine monotherapy with continuous 250 mg dosing remains the current first-line treatment recommendation. Terbinafine pulse dosing, itraconazole, and fluconazole therapy are second-line treatments that are useful when there are contraindications with terbinafine use.

9. Oral Treatments

Several treatment options exist for the treatment of onychomycosis (Table 2). Oral terbinafine is the most effective Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for onychomycosis [54]. Terbinafine treatment duration is typically a minimum of six weeks and twelve weeks for fingernail and toenail onychomycosis, respectively. Terbinafine complete cure rates vary between 35% and 78% in patients with toenail onychomycosis [16,17,18,55]. Terbinafine sensitivity is not well studied in onychomycosis involving non-dermatophyte molds or yeast [56].
Terbinafine pulse dosing regimens can vary in dose, duration, and frequency. A common regimen is two pulse regimens of terbinafine 250 mg daily for four weeks, followed by four weeks off. A meta-analysis by Gupta et al. determined that continuous terbinafine regimen is generally superior to pulse dosing for mycologic cure. However, both continuous and pulse dosing had similar complete cure rates [57,58]. Other pulse regimens for oral terbinafine include 500 mg daily for one week, followed by three weeks of no treatment, repeated every month for three months [59]. Studies assessing cost [60] and compliance [61] did not identify a difference between continuous and pulse regimens. However, pulse dosing may be preferred due to patient preference, side effects, comorbidities, and risk of potential drug–drug interactions [57,60].
Contraindications to terbinafine use include its interaction with other pharmaceuticals that are metabolized by cytochrome P-450 enzyme 2D6. Most notably, metoprolol is among this category of cP450 2D6 metabolized drugs, making terbinafine treatment discouraged in patients taking metoprolol. In these cases, oral treatment options for onychomycosis include itraconazole, an alternative broad-spectrum antifungal. Itraconazole is FDA-approved for the treatment of onychomycosis and is effective against dermatophytes, yeasts, and non-dermatophyte molds. Dosing options include a continuous treatment regimen of 200 mg daily for three months or a four-pulse treatment regimen of 400 mg daily for one week, followed by a three-week pause in drug treatment. Complete cure rate with itraconazole treatment ranges between 14–43% [16,17,18,19,20].
An additional second-line treatment option includes the oral antifungal fluconazole. Fluconazole is not FDA approved for the treatment of onychomycosis. However, clinical trials have established its efficacy in dermatophyte nail infections. Typical dosing regimen of fluconazole is 150–450 mg once weekly for a duration of six months for fingernails and 12 months or more for toenails [22,62]. Complete cure rates range from 21% to 48%, depending on dosage and treatment duration [21,22].
Table
Table 2. Current oral antifungal therapies.
Table 2. Current oral antifungal therapies.
Oral AntifungalDosing RegimenComplete Cure Rate (%)
Terbinafine [16,17,18,55]Fingernail: 250 mg/d for six weeks
Toenail: 250 mg/d for 12–16 weeks
Pulse: 250 mg/d for four weeks on, four weeks off, four weeks on		35–78
Itraconazole [16,17,18,19,20]Continuous: 200 mg/d for 12 weeks
Pulse: 400 mg/d for one week per month for 16 weeks		14–43
Fluconazole [21,22,62]Fingernail: 150–450 mg/week for six months
Toenail: 150–450 mg/week for 12 months		21–48
Antifungal resistance is a variable that also should be considered when choosing treatment options. As dermatophytic infections evolve over time, the efficacy of oral antifungals may change, as well. In a recent clinical trial, commonly prescribed antifungals, including terbinafine, itraconazole, and fluconazole, were tested against chronic and chronic relapsing tinea corporis, cruris, and faciei [25]. After four weeks of treatment, all drugs demonstrated a cure rate around 8% or less. After eight weeks of treatment, cure rates with terbinafine, itraconazole, and fluconazole were reported as 28%, 66%, and 42%, respectively. This study indicates the reality of antifungal resistance, as well as evidence suggesting the effectiveness of itraconazole in terbinafine-resistant dermatophytosis. Similar reports of increasing terbinafine resistance in Trichophyton species have been reported in Europe [23,24]. More studies are needed to further assess treatment regimens in multi-drug resistant cases.
Due to the systemic nature of oral antifungal medications, side effects and drug–drug interactions should be considered when prescribing each of these medications. Terbinafine has been associated with hepatic injury. Therefore, liver function tests are recommended prior to starting treatment, although some doctors recommend evaluating liver function throughout the course of terbinafine treatment [20]. Itraconazole therapy carries a high risk of drug interactions and should be used cautiously in patients with cardiac conditions due to its risk of heart failure and arrythmias [63]. Fluconazole is also associated with high risk of interactions (not much when used as pulse treatment) cardiovascular risk and has been reported to prolong the QT interval [64]. Additional side effects with fluconazole include significant congenital defects, and avoidance of this medication during pregnancy is strongly advised [65].
Interval monitoring in oral antifungal treatment is unnecessary in adults and children without preexisting hematologic or hepatic abnormalities [66]. The recommendation for continued hepatic function monitoring while receiving treatment with an oral antifungal has since been removed by the FDA. Due to higher incidence rates of drug-induced liver injury seen in patients with preexisting hepatic conditions, dosing adjustments and continued interval monitoring is beneficial in these cases.
Poor response to treatment is seen at higher rates in individuals with subungual keratosis measuring more than 2 mm and fungal infection involving the lateral nail or over 50% of the entire nail unit [15]. Recently a few studies showed that topical treatment with efinaconazole can be useful in this setting [51,52]. Given the terbinafine sensitivity to dermatophytes, onychomycosis caused by mixed infection or resistant organisms are also associated with poor prognostic outcomes. In the setting of decreased peripheral circulation, as in elderly or diabetic patients, poor treatment response to first-line oral antifungals has been reported.

10. Special Populations

Onychomycosis is more common in adults than in children. Prevalence-based studies are conflicting, with some reports ranging from 0.2% to as high as 7.66% [67,68]. While previously considered rare, several studies suggest that onychomycosis in children is on the rise [69,70,71,72]. While there are no FDA-approved medications for pediatric patients, evidence suggests that current treatments are safe in children, and dosing should be readjusted according to weight.
Onychomycosis has a higher incidence among elderly patients, with a reported prevalence nearly 20% in patients greater than 60 years old [73]. Few studies have evaluated the efficacy of oral antifungals in the elderly population [74,75,76]. Cure rates with approved therapies terbinafine and itraconazole have been reported to be lower when compared to adult population [16,76,77]; however, they are considered a safe option when possible, and drug interactions have been evaluated [75].
Immunocompromised patients, such as HIV positive individuals with CD4 counts less than 500, have a higher prevalence of tinea pedis and onychomycosis [78,79]. There are scarce studies that have evaluated oral antifungals in the HIV population [74,75]; however, terbinafine has shown to be efficacious and well tolerated [75]. Of note, HIV positive individuals who are on antiretroviral therapy with normal CD4 counts can eradicate the infection. Additionally, combined antiretroviral therapy itself has demonstrated to clinically improve onychomycosis [80].

11. Terbinafine Resistance: A Public Health Concern

Terbinafine resistance is an emerging problem globally, and isolates have been documented in India and Europe with increasing frequency [23,24]. The Trichophyton species is commonly identified, specifically T. rubrum, T. interdigitale/mentagrophytes, and T. indotineae [23,81,82,83]. Terbinafine inhibits squalene oxidase and interferes with ergosterol production, a compound necessary for fungal plasma membrane structure. Trichophyton resistant cases arise when point mutations develop in the squalene oxidase gene [81,82,83,84,85]. While cases of antifungal resistance have been largely reported in dermatophytic infections of the skin, the emergence and spread of these organisms is an important public health concern that can have significant consequences in onychomycosis cases.
As with antimicrobial resistance, dermatophyte-resistant species can be secondary to natural microbial changes over time, increased exposure to antifungals, and/or noncompliance. Mycological identification in suspected onychomycosis cases is crucial to avoid unnecessary antifungal and steroid use, and compliance should be emphasized in patients who begin onychomycosis therapy. In cases of recalcitrant infections, antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) should be explored to guide management. Additionally, azole-based treatments with itraconazole, longer treatment duration, and/or combination therapies may be necessary to eradicate terbinafine-resistant infections.

12. Novel Onychomycosis Therapies

New oral antifungal agents show promising results in the treatment of onychomycosis. Many of these are azole-based treatments. However, these medications are not approved by the FDA for the treatment of onychomycosis, and some are not available in the United States. As challenges continue to rise with terbinafine resistance, these new therapies may be promising in the treatment of superficial mycoses, such as onychomycosis (Table 3).
Fosravuconazole L-lysine ethanolate is a ravuconazole prodrug approved in Japan for the use of onychomycosis. A phase III trial demonstrated a complete cure rate of 59.4% with fosravuconazole 100 mg daily for 12 weeks [86]. Fosravuconazole also has a preferable safety profile in the elderly due to less potent inhibition of cytochrome P450 [87].
Posaconazole is a broad-spectrum azole that is FDA-approved for invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections and oral pharyngeal candidiasis. A phase IIB trial by Elewski et al. evaluated the use of posaconazole in onychomycosis and demonstrated a complete cure rate of 51.4% with posaconazole 200 mg daily for 24 weeks [88]. The efficacy and safety profile are favorable. However, the cost of posaconazole and lack of FDA approval for onychomycosis limits its use.
Oteseconazole, also known as VT-1161, is a tetrazole antifungal that is FDA-approved for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. A phase II trial assessed oteseconazole for distal and lateral subungual dermatophyte onychomycosis and reported mycologic cure rates between 41–45% at 60 weeks. Patients received either oteseconazole 300 mg once daily for two weeks, followed by 300 mg once weekly for 10 or 22 weeks, or 600 mg once daily for two weeks, followed by 600 mg once weekly for 10 or 22 weeks [89].
Voriconazole is a broad spectrum, triazole antifungal FDA approved for invasive Aspergillosis, candidemia in non-neutropenics, other deep tissue Candida infections, esophageal candidiasis, and Scedosporiosis and Fusariosis. A prospective clinical trial assessed the use of voriconazole for onychomycosis and reported a complete cure rate of 67.9% with eight weeks of therapy (200 mg twice daily for four weeks, followed by 200 mg once daily for four weeks) [90]. Dose adjustments may be needed in patients with hepatic or renal impairment [91].
Albaconazole is a new broad-spectrum antifungal with activity against dermatophytes and yeasts. Its efficacy in onychomycosis has been described in randomized clinical trials, as well as recently in a systematic review. Doses range from 100 to 400 mg once weekly for a 24–36 weeks treatment period. Its efficacy is dose-dependent, with the highest complete cure rate at 400 mg once weekly for 36 weeks (33%). However, further studies are needed to evaluate its security profile [92,93]. Albaconazole is not currently FDA-approved for any indication.

13. Other Treatments

Oral therapies for the treatment of onychomycosis can be augmented with the use of adjunct treatments, such as lasers, photodynamic therapy (PDT), or nail trimming/debridement. Antifungal combination therapy has also shown efficacy in treatment advancement.
Several studies have analyzed the use of the long pulsed neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser, diode laser, and fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser in onychomycosis. Lasers are currently FDA-approved for mild temporary clearance of the nail. It is theorized that lasers can be fungicidal through photothermolysis, with rapid elevation of temperature leading to fungal cell death. However, randomized trials yielded poor results with no statistical difference in patients who had laser therapy compared to placebo [94,95]. A study by Lim et al. did show improvement in onychomycosis when lasers were used as combination therapy with topical amorolfine for 12 weeks. The authors concluded that the beneficial effects may be through a combination of direct fungicidal effects and nail changes by the lasers, allowing deeper penetration of the topical drug [96]. Therefore, lasers can be considered as an adjunct therapy in elderly patients, patients with hepatic or renal disease, or other contraindications, but patients should be cautioned of the limited clinical improvement and high costs associated with lasers [97].
PDT is a non-invasive therapy that uses photosensitizing agents and a light source to generate reactive oxygen species and subsequently destroy cells in a given area. Many dermatophytes responsible for onychomycosis can absorb photosensitizing agents, making them susceptible to apoptosis by PDT [98]. PDT itself presents an optimal treatment option for patients with contraindications to oral antifungals. PDT used in combination with oral antifungals has also shown higher cure rates and a shorter treatment duration [99]. The most common photosensitizing agents used in PDT for onychomycosis are aminolevulinic acid (ALA), methyl-aminolevulinic acid (MAL), and methylene blue (MB). The number of treatment sessions varies from three to twelve sessions with incubation times of 1–5 h. The efficacy of MAL and MB use in PDT in conjunction with oral terbinafine demonstrated a 70% complete cure rate in both modalities [100].
As an additional treatment option, nail debridement can be used in combination with oral antifungals. Patients who underwent aggressive nail debridement with oral terbinafine therapy demonstrated higher clinical cure rates (59.8% vs. 51.4%) and complete cure rates than patients who received terbinafine therapy alone [101]. Data published on this treatment regimen, however, are relatively limited.
Combination therapy of antifungals has been shown to improve treatment response compared to monotherapy. In addition to improved efficacy, combination therapy may also help to combat antifungal resistance, which is being encountered at an increasing frequency [102]. However, more studies are needed to assess oral antifungal combination therapy [103].

14. Conclusions

Onychomycosis is a common nail disease caused by dermatophytes, yeasts, and NDMs. Oral treatment is indicated in moderate to severe cases, multiple digit involvement, and/or failure of topical therapies. Although several antifungal oral therapies are available, terbinafine-resistant isolates are emerging and can have significant impact on future management. Novel drugs are needed to combat this challenge, and several studies have demonstrated promising preliminary data with newer antifungal therapies. Additional studies are needed to assess and analyze safety profiles, dosages, and establish guidelines for these new drugs.

Author Contributions

A.T. Writing—Original Draft Preparation, N.M.B.; Writing—Drafting, Review and Editing, N.M.B.; Writing—Drafting, Review and Editing, G.R.-T.; Writing—Drafting, Review and Editing, S.P.; Supervision, A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

A.T. is a consultant for DS Laboratories, Monat Global, Almirall, Thirty Madison, Eli Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, P&G, Pfizer, and Myovant. The remaining authors have no conflicts to declare. We confirm that neither the manuscript nor any parts of its content are currently under consideration or published in another journal.

References

  1. Gupta, A.K.; Venkataraman, M.; Talukder, M. Onychomycosis in Older Adults: Prevalence, Diagnosis, and Management. Drugs Aging 2022, 39, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gupta, A.K.; Gupta, G.; Jain, H.C.; Lynde, C.W.; Foley, K.A.; Daigle, D.; Cooper, E.A.; Summerbell, R.C. The prevalence of unsuspected onychomycosis and its causative organisms in a multicentre Canadian sample of 30000 patients visiting physicians’ offices. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2016, 30, 1567–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vasconcellos, C.; Pereira, C.Q.; Souza, M.C.; Pelegrini, A.; Freitas, R.S.; Takahashi, J.P. Identification of fungi species in the onychomycosis of institutionalized elderly. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2013, 88, 377–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gupta, A.K.; Jain, H.C.; Lynde, C.W.; Watteel, G.N.; Summerbell, R.C. Prevalence and epidemiology of unsuspected onychomycosis in patients visiting dermatologists’ offices in Ontario, Canada—A multicenter survey of 2001 patients. Int. J. Dermatol. 1997, 36, 783–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gupta, A.K.; Konnikov, N.; MacDonald, P.; Rich, P.; Rodger, N.W.; Edmonds, M.W.; McManus, R.; Summerbell, R.C. Prevalence and epidemiology of toenail onychomycosis in diabetic subjects: A multicentre survey. Br. J. Dermatol. 1998, 139, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pierard, G. Onychomycosis and other superficial fungal infections of the foot in the elderly: A pan-European survey. Dermatology 2001, 202, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sigurgeirsson, B.; Steingrimsson, O. Risk factors associated with onychomycosis. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2004, 18, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Elewski, B.E. Onychomycosis: Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998, 11, 415–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gupta, A.K.; Lynde, C.W.; Jain, H.C.; Sibbald, R.G.; Elewski, B.E.; Daniel, C.R., 3rd; Watteel, G.N.; Summerbell, R.C. A higher prevalence of onychomycosis in psoriatics compared with non-psoriatics: A multicentre study. Br. J. Dermatol. 1997, 136, 786–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sigurgeirsson, B.; Baran, R. The prevalence of onychomycosis in the global population: A literature study. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2014, 28, 1480–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thomas, J.; Jacobson, G.A.; Narkowicz, C.K.; Peterson, G.M.; Burnet, H.; Sharpe, C. Toenail onychomycosis: An important global disease burden. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2010, 35, 497–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Summerbell, R.C.; Kane, J.; Krajden, S. Onychomycosis, tinea pedis and tinea manuum caused by non-dermatophytic filamentous fungi. Mycoses 1989, 32, 609–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ghannoum, M.A.; Hajjeh, R.A.; Scher, R.; Konnikov, N.; Gupta, A.K.; Summerbell, R.; Sullivan, S.; Daniel, R.; Krusinski, P.; Fleckman, P.; et al. A large-scale North American study of fungal isolates from nails: The frequency of onychomycosis, fungal distribution, and antifungal susceptibility patterns. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2000, 43, 641–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Welsh, O.; Vera-Cabrera, L.; Welsh, E. Onychomycosis. Clin. Dermatol. 2010, 28, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Scher, R.K.; Baran, R. Onychomycosis in clinical practice: Factors contributing to recurrence. Br. J. Dermatol. 2003, 149 (Suppl. 65), 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Evans, E.G.; Sigurgeirsson, B. Double blind, randomised study of continuous terbinafine compared with intermittent itraconazole in treatment of toenail onychomycosis. The LION Study Group. BMJ 1999, 318, 1031–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sigurgeirsson, B.; Olafsson, J.H.; Steinsson, J.B.; Paul, C.; Billstein, S.; Evans, E.G. Long-term effectiveness of treatment with terbinafine vs itraconazole in onychomycosis: A 5-year blinded prospective follow-up study. Arch. Dermatol. 2002, 138, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Epstein, E. How often does oral treatment of toenail onychomycosis produce a disease-free nail? An analysis of published data. Arch. Dermatol. 1998, 134, 1551–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Backer, M.; De Vroey, C.; Lesaffre, E.; Scheys, I.; De Keyser, P. Twelve weeks of continuous oral therapy for toenail onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes: A double-blind comparative trial of terbinafine 250 mg/day versus itraconazole 200 mg/day. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1998, 38 (Suppl. 2), S57–S63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gupta, A.K.; De Doncker, P.; Scher, R.K.; Haneke, E.; Daniel, C.R., 3rd; Andre, J.; Baran, R. Itraconazole for the treatment of onychomycosis. Int. J. Dermatol. 1998, 37, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Havu, V.; Heikkila, H.; Kuokkanen, K.; Nuutinen, M.; Rantanen, T.; Saari, S.; Stubb, S.; Suhonen, R.; Turjanmaa, K. A double-blind, randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of terbinafine (Lamisil) with fluconazole (Diflucan) in the treatment of onychomycosis. Br. J. Dermatol. 2000, 142, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gupta, A.K.; Drummond-Main, C.; Paquet, M. Evidence-based optimal fluconazole dosing regimen for onychomycosis treatment. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 2013, 24, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Astvad, K.M.T.; Hare, R.K.; Jorgensen, K.M.; Saunte, D.M.L.; Thomsen, P.K.; Arendrup, M.C. Increasing Terbinafine Resistance in Danish Trichophyton Isolates 2019–2020. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moreno-Sabater, A.; Normand, A.C.; Bidaud, A.L.; Cremer, G.; Foulet, F.; Brun, S.; Bonnal, C.; Ait-Ammar, N.; Jabet, A.; Ayachi, A.; et al. Terbinafine Resistance in Dermatophytes: A French Multicenter Prospective Study. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Singh, S.; Chandra, U.; Anchan, V.N.; Verma, P.; Tilak, R. Limited effectiveness of four oral antifungal drugs (fluconazole, griseofulvin, itraconazole and terbinafine) in the current epidemic of altered dermatophytosis in India: Results of a randomized pragmatic trial. Br. J. Dermatol. 2020, 183, 840–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lipner, S.R.; Scher, R.K. Onychomycosis: Diagnosis and therapy. In Medical Mycology: Current Trends and Future Prospects; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; p. 28. [Google Scholar]
  27. Walling, H.W.; Sniezek, P.J. Distribution of toenail dystrophy predicts histologic diagnosis of onychomycosis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2007, 56, 945–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Augustin, M.; Radtke, M.A.; Herberger, K.; Kornek, T.; Heigel, H.; Schaefer, I. Prevalence and disease burden of hyperhidrosis in the adult population. Dermatology 2013, 227, 10–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zaias, N. Onychomycosis. Arch. Dermatol. 1972, 105, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hay, R.J.; Baran, R. Onychomycosis: A proposed revision of the clinical classification. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2011, 65, 1219–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tosti, A.; Baran, R.; Piraccini, B.M.; Fanti, P.A. “Endonyx” onychomycosis: A new modality of nail invasion by dermatophytes. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1999, 79, 52–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Baran, R.; Faergemann, J.; Hay, R.J. Superficial white onychomycosis—A syndrome with different fungal causes and paths of infection. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2007, 57, 879–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hay, R. Chronic dermatophyte infections. I. Clinical and mycological features. Br. J. Dermatol. 1982, 106, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Roberts, R.; Evans, E. Subungual dermatophytoma complicating dermatophyte onychomycosis. Br. J. Dermatol. 1998, 138, 189–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Badillet, G. Mélanonychies superficielles. Bull. Société Française Mycol. Médicale 1988, 17, 335–340. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jones, S.; White, J.; Jacobs, P.; Porter, C. Hendersonula toruloidea infection of the nails in Caucasians. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 1985, 10, 444–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Baran, R. Proximal subungual Candida onychomycosis. An unusual manifestation of chronic mucocutaneous candidosis. Br. J. Dermatol. 1997, 137, 286–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tosti, T.; Piraccini, P. Correspondence. Proximal subungual onychomycosis due to Aspergillus niger: Report of two cases. Br. J. Dermatol. 1998, 139, 156–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Baran, R.; Tosti, A.; Piraccini, B.M. Uncommon clinical patterns of Fusarium nail infection: Report of three cases. Br. J. Dermatol. 1997, 136, 424–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Daniel, C.R., 3rd; Daniel, M.P.; Daniel, C.M.; Sullivan, S.; Ellis, G. Chronic paronychia and onycholysis: A thirteen-year experience. Cutis 1996, 58, 397–401. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lim, S.S.; Hui, L.; Ohn, J.; Cho, Y.; Oh, C.C.; Mun, J.H. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for onychomycosis: A systematic review. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 1048913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Stephen, S.; Tosti, A.; Rubin, A.I. Diagnostic applications of nail clippings. Dermatol. Clin. 2015, 33, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Elewski, B.E. Clinical pearl: Diagnosis of onychomycosis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1995, 32, 500–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Elewski, B.E. Diagnosis and Treatment of Onychomycosis: A Clinician’s Handbook; SynerMed: Surrey, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  45. Baran, R.; Tosti, A.; Hartmane, I.; Altmeyer, P.; Hercogova, J.; Koudelkova, V.; Ruzicka, T.; Combemale, P.; Mikazans, I. An innovative water-soluble biopolymer improves efficacy of ciclopirox nail lacquer in the management of onychomycosis. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2009, 23, 773–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lacquer, P.N. Topical Solution 8% [Package Insert]; Dermik Laboratories: Berwyn, PA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  47. Gupta, A.K.; Joseph, W.S. Ciclopirox 8% nail lacquer in the treatment of onychomycosis of the toenails in the United States. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2000, 90, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lauharanta, J. Comparative efficacy and safety of amorolfine nail lacquer 2% versus 5% once weekly. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 1992, 17 (Suppl. 1), 41–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tschen, E.H.; Bucko, A.D.; Oizumi, N.; Kawabata, H.; Olin, J.T.; Pillai, R. Efinaconazole solution in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis: A phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2013, 12, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Elewski, B.E.; Rich, P.; Pollak, R.; Pariser, D.M.; Watanabe, S.; Senda, H.; Ieda, C.; Smith, K.; Pillai, R.; Ramakrishna, T.; et al. Efinaconazole 10% solution in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis: Two phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2013, 68, 600–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Watanabe, S.; Iozumi, K.; Abe, M.; Ito, Y.; Uesugi, T.; Onoduka, T.; Kato, I.; Kato, F.; Kodama, K.; Takahashi, H.; et al. Clinical effectiveness of efinaconazole 10% solution for treatment of onychomycosis with longitudinal spikes. J. Dermatol. 2021, 48, 1474–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Cantrell, W.; Canavan, T.; Elewski, B. Report of a case of a dermatophytoma successfully treated with topical efinaconazole 10% solution. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2015, 14, 524–526. [Google Scholar]
  53. Iorizzo, M.; Piraccini, B.M.; Tosti, A. Today’s treatments options for onychomycosis. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2010, 8, 875–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zane, L.T.; Chanda, S.; Coronado, D.; Del Rosso, J. Antifungal agents for onychomycosis: New treatment strategies to improve safety. Dermatol. Online J. 2016, 22, 13030/qt8dg124gs. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Heikkila, H.; Stubb, S. Long-term results in patients with onychomycosis treated with terbinafine or itraconazole. Br. J. Dermatol. 2002, 146, 250–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Elewski, B.E. Large-scale epidemiological study of the causal agents of onychomycosis: Mycological findings from the Multicenter Onychomycosis Study of Terbinafine. Arch. Dermatol. 1997, 133, 1317–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Gupta, A.K.; Paquet, M.; Simpson, F.; Tavakkol, A. Terbinafine in the treatment of dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis: A meta-analysis of efficacy for continuous and intermittent regimens. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2013, 27, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gupta, A.K.; Stec, N.; Bamimore, M.A.; Foley, K.A.; Shear, N.H.; Piguet, V. The efficacy and safety of pulse vs. continuous therapy for dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2020, 34, 580–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Warshaw, E.M.; Fett, D.D.; Bloomfield, H.E.; Grill, J.P.; Nelson, D.B.; Quintero, V.; Carver, S.M.; Zielke, G.R.; Lederle, F.A. Pulse versus continuous terbinafine for onychomycosis: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2005, 53, 578–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schram, S.E.; Warshaw, E.M. Costs of pulse versus continuous terbinafine for onychomycosis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2007, 56, 525–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Warshaw, E.M.; Bowman, T.; Bodman, M.A.; Kim, J.J.; Silva, S.; Mathias, S.D. Satisfaction with onychomycosis treatment. Pulse versus continuous dosing. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2003, 93, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Scher, R.K.; Breneman, D.; Rich, P.; Savin, R.C.; Feingold, D.S.; Konnikov, N.; Shupack, J.L.; Pinnell, S.; Levine, N.; Lowe, N.J.; et al. Once-weekly fluconazole (150, 300, or 450 mg) in the treatment of distal subungual onychomycosis of the toenail. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1998, 38, S77–S86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Paul, V.; Rawal, H. Cardiotoxicity with Itraconazole. BMJ Case Rep. 2017, 2017, bcr2017219376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Berger, F.A.; Monadian, N.; de Groot, N.M.S.; Santbergen, B.; van der Sijs, H.; Becker, M.L.; Broers, A.E.C.; van Gelder, T.; van den Bemt, P. QTc prolongation during ciprofloxacin and fluconazole combination therapy: Prevalence and associated risk factors. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 84, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mølgaard-Nielsen, D.; Svanström, H.; Melbye, M.; Hviid, A.; Pasternak, B. Association Between Use of Oral Fluconazole During Pregnancy and Risk of Spontaneous Abortion and Stillbirth. JAMA 2016, 315, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Stolmeier, D.A.; Stratman, H.B.; McIntee, T.J.; Stratman, E.J. Utility of Laboratory Test Result Monitoring in Patients Taking Oral Terbinafine or Griseofulvin for Dermatophyte Infections. JAMA Dermatol. 2018, 154, 1409–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Gupta, A.K.; Sibbald, R.G.; Lynde, C.W.; Hull, P.R.; Prussick, R.; Shear, N.H.; De Doncker, P.; Daniel, C.R., 3rd; Elewski, B.E. Onychomycosis in children: Prevalence and treatment strategies. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1997, 36, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Vestergaard-Jensen, S.; Mansouri, A.; Jensen, L.H.; Jemec, G.B.E.; Saunte, D.M.L. Systematic review of the prevalence of onychomycosis in children. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2022, 39, 855–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Lange, M.; Roszkiewicz, J.; Szczerkowska-Dobosz, A.; Jasiel-Walikowska, E.; Bykowska, B. Onychomycosis is no longer a rare finding in children. Mycoses 2006, 49, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Rodriguez-Pazos, L.; Pereiro-Ferreiros, M.M.; Pereiro, M., Jr.; Toribio, J. Onychomycosis observed in children over a 20-year period. Mycoses 2011, 54, 450–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sigurgeirsson, B.; Kristinsson, K.G.; Jonasson, P.S. Onychomycosis in Icelandic children. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2006, 20, 796–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gulgun, M.; Balci, E.; Karaoglu, A.; Kesik, V.; Babacan, O.; Fidanci, M.K.; Turker, T.; Tok, D.; Koc, N. Prevalence and risk factors of onychomycosis in primary school children living in rural and urban areas in Central Anatolia of Turkey. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2013, 79, 777–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gupta, A.K.; Jain, H.C.; Lynde, C.W.; Macdonald, P.; Cooper, E.A.; Summerbell, R.C. Prevalence and epidemiology of onychomycosis in patients visiting physicians’ offices: A multicenter canadian survey of 15,000 patients. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2000, 43, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Baran, R.; Hay, R.J.; Garduno, J.I. Review of antifungal therapy, part II: Treatment rationale, including specific patient populations. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 2008, 19, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Cribier, B.J.; Bakshi, R. Terbinafine in the treatment of onychomycosis: A review of its efficacy in high-risk populations and in patients with nondermatophyte infections. Br. J. Dermatol. 2004, 150, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Gupta, A.K.; Konnikov, N.; Lynde, C.W. Single-blind, randomized, prospective study on terbinafine and itraconazole for treatment of dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis in the elderly. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2001, 44, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Tosti, A.; Piraccini, B.M.; Stinchi, C.; Venturo, N.; Bardazzi, F.; Colombo, M.D. Treatment of dermatophyte nail infections: An open randomized study comparing intermittent terbinafine therapy with continuous terbinafine treatment and intermittent itraconazole therapy. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1996, 34, 595–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Gupta, A.K.; Taborda, P.; Taborda, V.; Gilmour, J.; Rachlis, A.; Salit, I.; Gupta, M.A.; MacDonald, P.; Cooper, E.A.; Summerbell, R.C. Epidemiology and prevalence of onychomycosis in HIV-positive individuals. Int. J. Dermatol. 2000, 39, 746–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Singh, H.; Singh, P.; Tiwari, P.; Dey, V.; Dulhani, N.; Singh, A. Dermatological manifestations in HIV-infected patients at a tertiary care hospital in a tribal (Bastar) region of Chhattisgarh, India. Indian J. Dermatol. 2009, 54, 338–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ruiz-Lopez, P.; Moreno-Coutino, G.; Fernandez-Martinez, R.; Espinoza-Hernandez, J.; Rodriguez-Zulueta, P.; Reyes-Teran, G. Evaluation of improvement of onychomycosis in HIV-infected patients after initiation of combined antiretroviral therapy without antifungal treatment. Mycoses 2015, 58, 516–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Salehi, Z.; Shams-Ghahfarokhi, M.; Razzaghi-Abyaneh, M. Antifungal drug susceptibility profile of clinically important dermatophytes and determination of point mutations in terbinafine-resistant isolates. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 37, 1841–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ebert, A.; Monod, M.; Salamin, K.; Burmester, A.; Uhrlass, S.; Wiegand, C.; Hipler, U.C.; Kruger, C.; Koch, D.; Wittig, F.; et al. Alarming India-wide phenomenon of antifungal resistance in dermatophytes: A multicentre study. Mycoses 2020, 63, 717–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Singh, A.; Masih, A.; Monroy-Nieto, J.; Singh, P.K.; Bowers, J.; Travis, J.; Khurana, A.; Engelthaler, D.M.; Meis, J.F.; Chowdhary, A. A unique multidrug-resistant clonal Trichophyton population distinct from Trichophyton mentagrophytes/Trichophyton interdigitale complex causing an ongoing alarming dermatophytosis outbreak in India: Genomic insights and resistance profile. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2019, 133, 103266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Rudramurthy, S.M.; Shankarnarayan, S.A.; Dogra, S.; Shaw, D.; Mushtaq, K.; Paul, R.A.; Narang, T.; Chakrabarti, A. Mutation in the Squalene Epoxidase Gene of Trichophyton interdigitale and Trichophyton rubrum Associated with Allylamine Resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Singh, A.; Masih, A.; Khurana, A.; Singh, P.K.; Gupta, M.; Hagen, F.; Meis, J.F.; Chowdhary, A. High terbinafine resistance in Trichophyton interdigitale isolates in Delhi, India harbouring mutations in the squalene epoxidase gene. Mycoses 2018, 61, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Watanabe, S.; Tsubouchi, I.; Okubo, A. Efficacy and safety of fosravuconazole L-lysine ethanolate, a novel oral triazole antifungal agent, for the treatment of onychomycosis: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized phase III study. J. Dermatol. 2018, 45, 1151–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Noguchi, H.; Matsumoto, T.; Kimura, U.; Hiruma, M.; Kano, R.; Kubo, M.; Fukushima, S.; Ihn, H. Fosravuconazole to treat severe onychomycosis in the elderly. J. Dermatol. 2021, 48, 228–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Elewski, B.; Pollak, R.; Ashton, S.; Rich, P.; Schlessinger, J.; Tavakkol, A. A randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, investigator-blinded study of four treatment regimens of posaconazole in adults with toenail onychomycosis. Br. J. Dermatol. 2012, 166, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Elewski, B.; Brand, S.; Degenhardt, T.; Curelop, S.; Pollak, R.; Schotzinger, R.; Tavakkol, A. A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VT-1161 oral tablets in the treatment of patients with distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis of the toenail. Br. J. Dermatol. 2021, 184, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Khondker, L. Efficacy and safety of voriconazole in the treatment failure cases of Dermatophytosis. Gulf J. Dermatol. Venereol. 2020, 27, 24–30. [Google Scholar]
  91. Neofytos, D.; Lombardi, L.R.; Shields, R.K.; Ostrander, D.; Warren, L.; Nguyen, M.H.; Thompson, C.B.; Marr, K.A. Administration of voriconazole in patients with renal dysfunction. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, 913–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Sigurgeirsson, B.; van Rossem, K.; Malahias, S.; Raterink, K. A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, dose-ranging study to investigate the efficacy and safety of 4 dose regimens of oral albaconazole in patients with distal subungual onychomycosis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2013, 69, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Favero, M.L.D.; Bonetti, A.F.; Domingos, E.L.; Tonin, F.S.; Pontarolo, R. Oral antifungal therapies for toenail onychomycosis: A systematic review with network meta-analysis toenail mycosis: Network meta-analysis. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 2022, 33, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Hollmig, S.T.; Rahman, Z.; Henderson, M.T.; Rotatori, R.M.; Gladstone, H.; Tang, J.Y. Lack of efficacy with 1064-nm neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for the treatment of onychomycosis: A randomized, controlled trial. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2014, 70, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Karsai, S.; Jager, M.; Oesterhelt, A.; Weiss, C.; Schneider, S.W.; Junger, M.; Raulin, C. Treating onychomycosis with the short-pulsed 1064-nm-Nd:YAG laser: Results of a prospective randomized controlled trial. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2017, 31, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lim, E.H.; Kim, H.R.; Park, Y.O.; Lee, Y.; Seo, Y.J.; Kim, C.D.; Lee, J.H.; Im, M. Toenail onychomycosis treated with a fractional carbon-dioxide laser and topical antifungal cream. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2014, 70, 918–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gupta, A.K.; Versteeg, S.G. A critical review of improvement rates for laser therapy used to treat toenail onychomycosis. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2017, 31, 1111–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Aspiroz, C.; Fortuño Cebamanos, B.; Rezusta, A.; Paz-Cristóbal, P.; Domínguez-Luzón, F.; Gené Díaz, J.; Gilaberte, Y. Photodynamic therapy for onychomycosis. case report and review of the literature. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2011, 28, 191–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Navarro-Bielsa, A.; Gracia-Cazaña, T.; Robres, P.; Lopez, C.; Calvo-Priego, M.D.; Aspiroz, C.; Gilaberte, Y. Combination of Photodynamic Therapy and Oral Antifungals for the Treatment of Onychomycosis. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Alberdi, E.; Gómez, C. Methylene blue vs methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy in combination with oral terbinafine in the treatment of severe dermatophytic toenail onychomycosis: Short- and long-term effects. Mycoses 2020, 63, 859–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Jennings, M.B.; Pollak, R.; Harkless, L.B.; Kianifard, F.; Tavakkol, A. Treatment of toenail onychomycosis with oral terbinafine plus aggressive debridement: IRON-CLAD, a large, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2006, 96, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Mukherjee, P.K.; Leidich, S.D.; Isham, N.; Leitner, I.; Ryder, N.S.; Ghannoum, M.A. Clinical Trichophyton rubrum strain exhibiting primary resistance to terbinafine. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Gupta, A.K.; Lynde, C.W.; Konnikov, N. Single-blind, randomized, prospective study of sequential itraconazole and terbinafine pulse compared with terbinafine pulse for the treatment of toenail onychomycosis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2001, 44, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Onychomycosis subtypes and their associated clinical features and etiologic agents.
Table 1. Onychomycosis subtypes and their associated clinical features and etiologic agents.
Onychomycosis SubtypesClinical FeaturesEtiologic Agents
Distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis (DLSO) [26,33,34]
○
Hyperkeratosis
○
Onycholysis
○
Nail discoloration (white-yellow, black, brown, or orange)
  • Dermatophytes (T. rubrum, T. mentagrophytes, E. flocossum)
  • Fussarium species
  • Candida albicans
  • Scopulariopsis brevicaulis
Superficial onychomycosis (SO) [35,36]
○
Superficial patches (white or black)
○
Transverse striae
  • Dermatophytes (T. rubrum, T. metagrophytes)
  • Fussarium species
  • Scytalidium
Proximal subungual onychomycosis (PSO) [37,38,39,40]
○
Transverse white bands
○
Proximal white patch
○
Superficial nail is normal.
○
Paronychia (as a preceding condition)
  • T. rubrum
  • Fusarium species
  • Candida albicans
  • Aspergillus species
Endonyx onychomycosis [30,31]
○
Lamellar nail splitting
○
Nail discoloration (milky patches)
  • T. soudanense
  • T. violaceum
Mixed pattern onychomycosis [30]
○
DLSO + SO features (hyperkeratosis, onycholysis, nail discoloration, superficial patches or transverse striae)
○
PSO + SO features (transverse bands, longitudinal bands, transverse striae and superficial patches)
  • T. rubrum
  • Fussarium species
Total dystrophic onychomycosis (TDO) [30]
○
Dystrophic and crumbled nail plate
○
Nail bed thickening
  • Dermatophytes (T. rubrum)
  • C. albicans
Secondary onychomycosis
○
Clinical features of underlying nail condition + onychomycosis findings (hyperkeratosis, discoloration, patches, striae)
  • Dermatophytes
  • Molds
Table
Table 3. Novel antifungal therapies and their recommended dosage for the treatment of onychomycosis.
Table 3. Novel antifungal therapies and their recommended dosage for the treatment of onychomycosis.
Oral AntifungalDosing Regimen *Complete
Cure Rate (%)		Notes
Fosravuconazole [86,87]100 mg/d for 12 weeks59.4
  • Safe in elderly due to less potent inhibition of CP450
  • Approved in Japan only.
  • No clinical data on children, pregnant women, or nursing mothers.
Posaconazole [88]200 mg/d for 24 weeks51.4
  • Should be avoided in pregnancy.
  • Multiple drug interactions
Oteseconazole [89]Loading dose: 300 mg/d for two weeks. Followed by 300 mg/week for 10 or 22 weeks
OR
Loading dose: 600 mg once daily for two weeks. Followed by 600 mg/week for 10 or 22 weeks		41–45
  • No clinical data on children, pregnant patients, or nursing mothers.
Voriconazole [90,91]200 mg/bid for four weeks, followed by 200  mg/d for four weeks67.9
  • Dose adjustments needed in patients with hepatic or renal impairment.
  • Multiple drug interactions
Albaconazole [92,93]400 mg/week for 36 weeks33
  • Not available in the USA
  • Lengthy therapy regimen
* All dosing regimens are for toenail onychomycosis.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maskan Bermudez, N.; Rodríguez-Tamez, G.; Perez, S.; Tosti, A. Onychomycosis: Old and New. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9050559

AMA Style

Maskan Bermudez N, Rodríguez-Tamez G, Perez S, Tosti A. Onychomycosis: Old and New. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(5):559. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9050559

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maskan Bermudez, Narges, Giselle Rodríguez-Tamez, Sofia Perez, and Antonella Tosti. 2023. "Onychomycosis: Old and New" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 5: 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9050559

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop