Next Article in Journal
Exophiala dermatitidis Eye Infection: Case Report and Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
Mycogenic Nanomaterials: What Fungal Nanoparticles Promise and What Still Holds Them Back
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Different Initial pH Conditions on the Antioxidant Capacity and Lipidomic Profiles of Samsoniella hepialid

State Key Laboratory of Plateau Ecology and Agriculture, Qinghai Academy of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2026, 12(5), 367; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12050367
Submission received: 31 March 2026 / Revised: 12 May 2026 / Accepted: 13 May 2026 / Published: 16 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Metabolomics and Genomics, 3rd Edition)

Abstract

Samsoniella hepiali produces an array of pharmacologically valuable metabolites, but how environmental pH regulates its antioxidant system and lipid metabolism during submerged fermentation remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different initial culture pH values (pH 4, 5, 6, and 7) on the antioxidant capacity and lipidomic metabolism of S. hepiali. The results demonstrated that at pH 5, the activities of peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD), the contents of total phenolics (TP) and flavonoids, the scavenging rates of DPPH• and •OH, and the total antioxidant capacity all peaked. Conversely, the level of glutathione (GSH) reached its maximum at pH 6 (0.69 ± 0.014 μmol/g). Lipidomic analysis identified a total of 404 lipid molecular species, mainly TG, PE, and DG. Comparative analysis among pH 4 vs. pH 5, pH 6 vs. pH 5, and pH 7 vs. pH 5 revealed 27 core DALs belonging to 11 lipid subclasses, most of which were upregulated at pH 5. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis further revealed that sphingolipid metabolism was the sole core co-enriched pathway under different pH conditions. Particularly at pH 5, key signaling lipids, such as ceramides, underwent pronounced targeted accumulation. This study elucidates the molecular adaptation mechanisms of medicinal fungi in response to pH variation from a lipidomic perspective. It provides a basis for optimizing fermentation conditions to enhance antioxidant activity and functional lipid production.

1. Introduction

Ophiocordyceps sinensis is a highly valued traditional medicinal fungus in China. It contains diverse bioactive compounds, including polysaccharides, terpenoids, alkaloids, and phenolics, with anti-inflammatory, antitumor, and immunomodulatory activities [1,2,3,4,5,6]. However, wild O. sinensis resources are declining because of its specialized parasitic life cycle, climate change, and persistent overharvesting [7,8,9,10]. Samsoniella hepiali is an entomopathogenic fungus that can infect Thitarodes hosts [11]. It has been demonstrated to synthesize active constituents highly analogous to those of O. sinensis, including polysaccharides, mannitol, adenosine, specific lipids, and flavonoids [12,13,14]. Consequently, the highly efficient cultivation of S. hepiali via submerged fermentation technology has emerged as a promising strategy to alleviate the shortage of wild O. sinensis.
During fermentation, environmental factors strongly affect mycelial growth and secondary metabolic networks [15,16]. Among them, pH is a key factor influencing antioxidant capacity. Previous studies have shown that pH affects the yield and activity of antioxidant compounds in Spirulina [17] and can also affect the antioxidant capacity of polysaccharides from Cordyceps militaris [18]. Lipids serve not only as the structural foundation of the cellular membrane barrier and intracellular energy reservoirs but also as crucial signaling hubs that govern cell growth, differentiation, and environmental adaptability [19,20,21]. The pH of the medium significantly influences both the lipid yields [22,23] and lipid composition of fungi [24]. Recent advances in high-resolution mass spectrometry have made UPLC-MS/MS-based lipidomics a powerful approach for profiling metabolic responses to environmental changes [25]. However, the effects of pH on antioxidant capacity and lipid metabolism in S. hepiali remain unclear.
Accordingly, this study examined S. hepiali cultured under different initial pH conditions. Enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant responses were evaluated, and UPLC-MS/MS-based lipidomics was applied to characterize pH-dependent changes in mycelial lipid metabolism. These results provide new insight into the molecular basis of pH adaptation in medicinal fungi.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Strain and Cultivation Conditions

The S. hepiali strain used in this study was provided by the Cordyceps Laboratory, Academy of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Qinghai University (Xining, China). S. hepiali was cultured in a liquid potato dextrose medium containing 20% potato extract (Qinghai Libaochang Trading Co., Ltd., Xining, China), 2% glucose (Qinghai Libaochang Trading Co., Ltd., Xining, China), 0.3% peptone (Qinghai Libaochang Trading Co., Ltd., Xining, China), 0.2% KH2PO4 (Qinghai Libaochang Trading Co., Ltd., Xining, China), and 0.02% MgSO4 (Qinghai Libaochang Trading Co., Ltd., Xining, China). The initial pH of the basal medium was adjusted to 4, 5, 6, and 7 using NaOH (Qinghai Libaochang Trading Co., Ltd., Xining, China) and HCl (Qinghai Libaochang Trading Co., Ltd., Xining, China). After autoclaving, the pH of each medium was remeasured to ensure consistency with the experimental design. The activated strain was inoculated into the media with varying pH levels and incubated in a rotary shaker at 18 °C and 135 rpm for 7 days (Shanghai Zhichu Instrument Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China). The cultures were then centrifuged at 10,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C to harvest the mycelia. The resulting mycelial pellets were washed with sterile water and immediately stored at −80 °C for subsequent analyses.

2.2. Determination of Antioxidant Capacity

To comprehensively evaluate the antioxidant potential of the mycelia, this study measured the total antioxidant capacity via ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 2,2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) assays, the scavenging rates of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH•) and hydroxyl radicals (•OH), and the activities of key antioxidant enzymes, including catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD). Additionally, the contents of non-enzymatic antioxidant compounds, namely total phenolics (TP), flavonoids, ascorbic acid (AsA), and reduced glutathione (GSH), were quantitatively analyzed. All the aforementioned parameters were determined using commercial assay kits provided by Suzhou Comin Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Suzhou, China), strictly in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Detailed kit information is provided in Table 1.

2.3. Lipidomic Analysis

2.3.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Among the liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) grade reagents used in this study, methanol was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Acetonitrile and isopropanol were obtained from Shanghai Xingke High-Purity Solvents Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Formic acid was sourced from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ammonium formate and chloroform were provided by Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA), and methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) was acquired from CNW Technologies (Düsseldorf, Germany). Ultrapure water was prepared using a laboratory ultrapure water system (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).

2.3.2. Sample Preparation and Lipid Extraction

Initially, all harvested mycelial samples were lyophilized and ground into a fine powder. A quantitative amount of the dried sample was weighed into a centrifuge tube, and a lipid extraction solvent (MTBE:methanol = 3:1, v/v) was added. The mixture was vortexed at 2500 rpm at room temperature for disruption and extraction. Subsequently, ultrapure water was added to the system to induce the polar phase separation of the aqueous and organic layers. Following centrifugation, the upper lipid-rich organic phase was carefully collected and evaporated to dryness. Finally, the dried extract was reconstituted with a lipid reconstitution solvent (acetonitrile:isopropanol = 1:1, v/v). After a further centrifugation step, the clear supernatant was transferred into an autosampler vial for LC-MS/MS data acquisition.

2.3.3. Chromatographic and Mass Spectrometry Conditions

Lipidomic data acquisition was performed using an ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) system coupled with a tandem mass spectrometer (MS/MS).
Liquid chromatography conditions were as follows:
(1)
Column: Thermo Accucore™ C30 column (2.6 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm i.d., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA);
(2)
Mobile phases: phase A, acetonitrile/water (60:40, v/v) containing 0.1% formic acid and 10 mmol/L ammonium formate; phase B, acetonitrile/isopropanol (10:90, v/v) containing 0.1% formic acid and 10 mmol/L ammonium formate;
(3)
Gradient elution program: 0 min, A/B = 80:20 (v/v); 2 min, 70:30 (v/v); 4 min, 40:60 (v/v); 9 min, 15:85 (v/v); 14 min, 10:90 (v/v); 15.5 min, 5:95 (v/v); 17.3 min, 5:95 (v/v); 17.5 min, 80:20 (v/v); and 20 min, 80:20 (v/v);
(4)
Flow rate: 0.35 mL/min; column temperature: 45 °C; injection volume: 2 μL.
Mass spectrometry conditions were as follows:
The temperature of the electrospray ionization (ESI) source was set at 500 °C. The ion spray voltage was 5500 V in positive ion mode and −4500 V in negative ion mode. Ion source gas 1 (GS1) was set at 45 psi, gas 2 (GS2) at 55 psi, and curtain gas (CUR) at 35 psi. In the triple quadrupole system, each ion pair was scanned and detected based on the optimized declustering potential (DP) and collision energy (CE).

2.3.4. Lipid Identification and Quantification

Lipid identification was based on comparison with mass spectral library, and qualitative analysis was performed according to the retention time (RT) and precursor/product ion pair information of the detected compounds. Lipid quantification was carried out using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA). After obtaining the lipid mass spectrometric data from different samples, the chromatographic peak areas of all detected compounds were integrated, and quantitative analysis was performed using the internal standard method, rather than being calculated on total lipid amount in% or dry mass. The internal standards used were a dedicated mixed isotopic standard for lipidomics. The detailed information on the internal standards is provided in Table S1 of the Supplementary Materials.

2.4. Data Preprocessing and Statistical Analysis

Antioxidant data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA after normality testing using SAS software (Version 9.4). Raw lipidomics mass spectrometry data were acquired and processed with Analyst 1.6.3, including baseline correction, peak detection, integration, retention time correction, alignment, and normalization. Regarding multivariate statistical analysis, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was initially employed to evaluate the distribution and separation trends of the lipidomes among the different groups. Subsequently, an Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) model was utilized to maximize the segregation between different pH groups. The screening criteria for differentially accumulated lipids (DALs) were set at a Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) score > 1.0 and a p-value < 0.05. Finally, Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA) and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis were conducted to explore the remodeling patterns of lipid metabolism in the mycelia under various pH conditions.

3. Results

3.1. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant responses of S. hepiali under different initial pH conditions were systematically evaluated using 12 physicochemical indicators. Among the four antioxidant enzyme indicators, the activities of POD, SOD, and GSH-Px all peaked at pH 5, recording values of 208.29 ± 5.88 U/g, 75.31 ± 5.59 U/g, and 585.43 ± 30.09 nmol/min/g, respectively. These values were significantly higher than those in the pH 4 and pH 7 groups (p < 0.05). Overall, the activities of CAT, POD, SOD, and GSH-Px exhibited an initial increase followed by a subsequent decrease as the initial pH of the medium increased. Regarding the non-enzymatic antioxidant system, the contents of flavonoids and TP, as well as the scavenging rates of DPPH• and •OH, also peaked at pH 5. Conversely, the GSH content reached its maximum at pH 6 (0.69 ± 0.014 μmol/g). No significant differences in AsA content were observed among groups (p > 0.05). The total antioxidant capacity at pH 5 was significantly stronger than that of the other three treatment groups (p < 0.05), among which no significant differences were detected. Correlation analysis further indicated that CAT and SOD activities were positively associated with GSH and flavonoid levels, as well as the activities of POD and GSH-Px. Furthermore, the total antioxidant capacity (evaluated via FRAP and ABTS assays) exhibited strong positive synergistic relationships with the DPPH• and •OH scavenging rates, alongside the levels of GSH, AsA, flavonoids, and POD (Figure 1).

3.2. Compositional Profiling of the S. hepiali Lipidome Under Different pH Conditions

A total of 404 lipid molecular species, spanning 21 subclasses, were identified across the four groups (Figure 2A; Table S2). In terms of relative abundance, glycerolipids and glycerophospholipids dominated the lipidomic profile. The most abundant lipid classes were triglycerides (TG, 55.94%), phosphatidylethanolamines (PE, 6.93%), diglycerides (DG, 4.46%), phosphatidylglycerols (PG, 3.22%), phosphatidylinositols (PI, 3.22%), and phosphatidylcholines (PC). Venn diagram analysis (Figure 2B) revealed that 382 lipid species were shared among all groups. This suggests that environmental pH did not fundamentally alter the basic architecture of the fungal lipidome but mainly influenced the accumulation levels of specific lipid molecules.

3.3. Multivariate Statistical Analysis of the Lipidomic Profiles

Unsupervised PCA was initially employed to visualize the overall variance among the groups. In the PCA score plot (Figure 3A), PC1 and PC2 explained 48.41% and 25.16% of the total variance, respectively, accounting for 73.57% cumulatively. Furthermore, the four sample groups showed clear and distinct clustering patterns. Biological replicates within each group clustered tightly, confirming the reliability of the experimental procedures and the stability of the instrumental analysis.
OPLS-DA was then used to further characterize intergroup differences. Pairwise comparisons of pH 4 vs. pH 5, pH 6 vs. pH 5, and pH 7 vs. pH 5 (Figure 3(B1–B3)) all showed clear separation in the score plots, suggesting substantial lipid metabolic variation under different pH conditions. To validate the robustness and predictive reliability of the models, permutation tests with 200 iterations were performed. The validation results (Figure 3(C1–C3)) were as follows: for the pH 4 vs. pH 5 group, R2X = 0.966, R2Y = 1, Q2 = 0.998; for the pH 6 vs. pH 5 group, R2X = 0.948, R2Y = 1, Q2 = 1; and for the pH 7 vs. pH 5 group, R2X = 0.973, R2Y = 1, Q2 = 1. Together with permutation test p values < 0.005, these results indicate that the models were robust and showed no obvious overfitting.

3.4. Screening and Trend Analysis of Differentially Accumulated Lipids (DALs)

Based on the Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) scores derived from the OPLS-DA model, combined with significant differences from univariate analysis, differentially accumulated lipids (DALs) were screened using VIP > 1.0 and p < 0.05. A Venn diagram analysis of the pH 4 vs. pH 5, pH 6 vs. pH 5, and pH 7 vs. pH 5 comparisons identified 27 core DALs that were commonly regulated across all groups. These shared DALs were broadly distributed across 11 distinct lipid subclasses. Among them, phytoceramides (Cert, 22.22%) and TG (22.22%) accounted for the highest proportions, followed by lysophosphatidylcholines (LPC, 11.11%) and phosphatidic acids (PA, 11.11%) (Figure 4A,B). Additionally, other subclasses included lysophosphatidylethanolamines (LPE), PE, ceramides (Cer), and DG. Hierarchical clustering showed clear differences in DAL abundance among the four groups. Notably, samples from the pH 5 group clustered independently into a single clade. Within this group, the majority of the differential lipids exhibited significantly high expression levels (indicated by red areas). Conversely, the contents of these lipids generally decreased as the pH value decreased (pH 4) or increased (pH 6 and pH 7).
K-means clustering analysis was employed to categorize the dynamic variation trends of the 27 shared DALs across the four pH gradients (Figure 4D). Among the sub-classes, a total of 17 DALs from sub-class 3 (n = 1), sub-class 4 (n = 6), sub-class 6 (n = 1), sub-class 7 (n = 2), sub-class 9 (n = 7), and sub-class 10 (n = 3) exhibited a consistent trend of their contents peaking at pH 5 and subsequently declining rapidly. In contrast, the contents of the DALs in sub-class 2 (n = 3) displayed a trend of gradual accumulation with increasing pH.
Volcano plots results indicated that changes in environmental pH induced a significant reorganization of the fungal lipidome. In the pH 4 vs. pH 5 comparison, 134 differential lipids were identified, comprising 128 significantly up-regulated and 6 significantly down-regulated lipids (Figure 5A). By comparison, in the pH 6 vs. pH 5 group, 81 differential lipids were screened, including 46 up-regulated and 35 down-regulated lipids (Figure 5B). Furthermore, in the pH 7 vs. pH 5 group, 124 differential lipids were identified, consisting of 87 up-regulated and 37 down-regulated lipids (Figure 5C). HCA was performed on the top 20 differential lipids in each comparative group. The clustering heatmaps (Figure 5D–F) clearly revealed the specific distribution patterns of lipid abundances in response to environmental pH changes. Across the three comparative groups, the core differential lipids consistently exhibited a highly specific enrichment pattern at pH 5. These lipids accumulated at relatively high levels (red scale) under pH 5 conditions, whereas their relative contents were significantly reduced (green scale) at pH 4, 6, and 7.

3.5. KEGG Pathway Enrichment Analysis of Differentially Accumulated Lipids

To further elucidate the biological functions and potential underlying mechanisms by which environmental pH regulates lipid metabolism, the identified DALs were mapped to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database for pathway enrichment analysis. The top 20 enriched pathways were selected for each comparison group. In the pH 4 vs. pH 5 comparison (Figure 6A), pathways including sphingolipid metabolism, cholesterol metabolism, and lipid and atherosclerosis exhibited significant enrichment. Similarly, in both the pH 6 vs. pH 5 and pH 7 vs. pH 5 groups (Figure 6B,C), the sphingolipid metabolism, choline metabolism in cancer, efferocytosis, and glycerophospholipid metabolism pathways were significantly enriched. Among these pathways, sphingolipid metabolism was the only pathway commonly enriched across all three comparisons. As illustrated in Figure 7, pH variation induced marked changes in several key intermediates within the sphingolipid metabolic network. Specifically, the abundances of dihydrosphingolipids, N-acylsphingosines, phytoceramides, and glycosylceramides were notably altered, indicating that sphingolipid metabolism may play a central role in the adaptation of S. hepiali to environmental acid–base variation.

4. Discussion

Previous studies have demonstrated that changes in culture pH can regulate the levels of antioxidant enzymes, including SOD, CAT, and POD, as well as non-enzymatic antioxidant components, such as phenolic compounds, thereby influencing free radical scavenging activity, reducing power, and metal-chelating capacity [17,26]. Our results indicate that environmental pH significantly regulates the antioxidant capacity of S. hepiali. The activities of core antioxidant enzymes such as POD, SOD, and GSH-Px and the contents of key non-enzymatic metabolites like flavonoids and TP all peaked at pH 5. This conclusion is further supported by total antioxidant capacity evaluations (FRAP and ABTS). These findings suggest that a slightly acidic environment pH 5 may be the optimal condition to activate the antioxidant potential of S. hepiali. Similar observations have been reported in other fungi, in which the initial fermentation pH profoundly influenced secondary metabolism and antioxidant activity. Specifically, altering the medium pH was proven to induce an increase in the antioxidant activity of Ganoderma [18]. Cordyceps militaris mycelia exhibited higher antioxidant capacity at an initial growth pH of 8–9 [27]. The extracellular polysaccharides of Tremella fuciformis cultured under pH 9 conditions showed greater reducing power and stronger DPPH radical scavenging activity [28].
While the core of metabolomics research lies in polar metabolites such as amino acids, organic acids, and nucleotides [29], lipidomics focuses on the comprehensive qualitative and quantitative analysis of diverse lipid molecules, having evolved into an independent scientific discipline [30,31]. According to the classification standards of the LIPID MAPS system, lipids are categorized into eight major classes: fatty acyls, glycerolipids, glycerophospholipids, sterol lipids, prenol lipids, sphingolipids, saccharolipids, and polyketides [32,33,34]. Using lipidomics, a total of 404 lipid compounds were identified in S. hepiali. These lipids were mainly assigned to four major categories: glycerolipids, glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids, and fatty acyls. Among them, TG, PE, and DG constituted the core components of the S. hepiali lipidome, and TG is the principal neutral lipid for energy storage in eukaryotic cells [35,36,37].This profile is fundamentally consistent with the lipidomic characteristics of O. Sinensis [38].
Multivariate statistical analysis confirmed that different pH gradients drove a drastic systemic remodeling of the fungal lipidomic profile. KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that, whether the environmental pH decreased from 5 to 4 or increased from 5 to 6/7, sphingolipid metabolism was the sole shared core pathway significantly enriched across all three comparative groups. Sphingolipids are not merely structural supporting components of the plasma membrane; they are core bioactive molecules governing apoptosis, and cellular growth [39,40]. Bondarenko, S.A. reported that changes in environmental pH rapidly increased the proportions of sphingolipids and sterols in the plasma membrane. This finding suggests that pH variation can induce remodeling of sphingolipid-related membrane structures [23]. Sasaki, H. confirmed that pH can strongly affect the aggregation behavior of sphingosine by altering ionic interactions and hydrogen-bonding states [41]. This, in turn, may influence sphingolipid metabolism. Our results demonstrated profound fluctuations within the sphingolipid metabolic network in response to pH variation, wherein dihydrosphingolipids, N-acylsphingosines, phytoceramides, and glycosylceramides all underwent significant directional alterations. Ceramides are crucial regulatory molecules in signal transduction [42]. pH changes can regulate the activity of ceramidase. As a result, the hydrolysis of intracellular ceramide is altered, which is important for cellular responses [43].
On the one hand, ROS can regulate sphingolipid metabolism by modulating enzymes involved in ceramide and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) synthesis. The balance between ROS production and antioxidant defense determines the metabolic direction of the ceramide–S1P axis. In turn, the homeostasis of ceramide and S1P can regulate multiple ROS-mediated signaling pathways [44]. On the other hand, a study by Kajiwara et al. demonstrated that intracellular sphingolipids can regulate ROS levels [45]. Furthermore, Niles et al. found that while intracellular sphingolipids effectively inhibit ROS, the ROS generated from their depletion can act as key signaling molecules to create a positive feedback loop that regulates sphingolipid biosynthesis [46]. In the present study, S. hepiali exhibited the highest antioxidant activity at pH 5, and sphingolipid metabolism was the universally enriched pathway under all conditions. These outcomes may indicate that the pH 5 environment may induce intracellular ROS accumulation in S. hepiali. This ROS accumulation initiates the antioxidant potential of the fungus, activating the expression of antioxidant enzymes while promoting the synthesis of antioxidants like flavonoids. Meanwhile, ROS acts as a signaling factor to regulate sphingolipid metabolism. This occurs by regulating the synthesis of key lipids such as ceramides and sphingosines, thereby modulating ROS levels. Collectively, this study provides an essential theoretical basis and practical insights for optimizing the industrial fermentation process of S. hepiali fungi.

5. Conclusions

This study elucidated the metabolic regulatory effects of the initial culture pH on S. hepiali from the dual perspectives of antioxidant phenotypes and the lipidome. It was established that a slightly acidic environment (pH 5) serves as the optimal condition for activating the antioxidant defense system, promoting the accumulation of both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants in the mycelia. Lipidomic profiling revealed that the dominant lipid subclasses in S. hepiali include TG, PE, and DG, with TG accounting for over 50% of the total lipid content. Using the pH 5 group as a reference, 134, 81, and 124 DALs were identified in the pH 4, pH 6, and pH 7 groups, respectively. Moreover, KEGG pathway analysis highlighted that sphingolipid metabolism was the sole universally enriched pathway across all comparisons. Overall, these results provide a theoretical foundation for optimizing submerged fermentation to enhance antioxidant-related bioactive compounds and lipid quality in Cordyceps.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof12050367/s1, Table S1: Internal standard information for quantitative lipids; Table S2: Identified lipid molecular information.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.J. and H.T.; methodology, C.T.; software, Y.T.; validation, J.Y., B.J. and H.T.; formal analysis, Y.L.; investigation, X.L.; resources, X.L.; data curation, Y.T.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.T.; writing—review and editing, Y.L. and X.L.; visualization, C.T.; supervision, J.Y.; project administration, H.T.; funding acquisition, Y.L. and X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Chinese Academy of Sciences−People’s Government of Qinghai Province on Sanjiangyuan National Park supported by Sanjiangyuan National Park (LHZX-2022-01); the Process Optimization and Application of Antioxidant Performance of Yushu Cordyceps sinensis Extract supported by the Department of Science and Technology of Qinghai Province (2025-NK-P45); the Wild Ophiocordyceps sinensis Identification and Application Project supported by the Forestry and Grassland Administration of Qinghai Province (QHRD-2025-004).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ABTS2,2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)
AsAAscorbic acid 
CATCatalase
CERCeramides
CERTPhytoceramides
DALsDifferentially accumulated lipids
DGDiglycerides
DPPH•2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical
FRAPFerric reducing antioxidant power
GSHGlutathione
GSH-PxGlutathione peroxidase
HCAHierarchical Cluster Analysis
KEGGKyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
LPCLysophosphatidylcholines
LPELysophosphatidylethanolamines
MTBEMethyl tert-butyl ether
O. sinensisOphiocordyceps sinensis
OPLS-DAOrthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis
PAPhosphatidic acids
PCAPrincipal Component Analysis
PCPhosphatidylcholines
PEPhosphatidylethanolamines
PGPhosphatidylglycerols
PIPhosphatidylinositols
PODPeroxidase
ROSReactive oxygen species
S. hepialiSamsoniella hepiali
S1Psphingosine-1-phosphate
SODSuperoxide dismutase
TGTriglycerides
TPTotal phenolics
UPLC-MS/MSUltra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
VIPVariable Importance in Projection
•OHHydroxyl radicals

References

  1. Zhang, N.; Chen, H.X.; Zhang, Y.; Xing, L.S.; Li, S.Q.; Wang, X.M.; Sun, Z. Chemical composition and antioxidant properties of five edible Hymenomycetes mushrooms. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2015, 50, 465–471. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bentharavithana, J.; Islam, T.; Xu, B.J. Medicinal Mushrooms in Colon Cancer Therapy: Mechanisms of Action of Bioactive Compounds and Therapeutic Potential. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 5304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, P.Y.; Yong, Y.Y.; Gu, Y.F.; Wang, Z.L.; Zhang, S.Z.; Lu, L. Comparison of Antioxidant and Antiproliferation Activities of Polysaccharides from Eight Species of Medicinal Mushrooms. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2015, 17, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jia, L.-F.; Chen, P.; Qu, G.-D.; Sun, N.; Guo, T.; Zhong, H.-Y.; Duan, Y.-H.; Sun, J.-H.; Sun, J.-B. A comprehensive review of the sedative-hypnotic mechanisms of edible fungi. Food Med. Homol. 2025, 2, 9420049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Szelenberger, R.; Wieckowska, M. Fungal Polysaccharides as Modulators of Molecular Pathways in Liver Health. Molecules 2025, 30, 4384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Vamanu, E.; Lakicevic, M.; Dedovic, N.; Dumitru, G.; Badea, I.G.; Gatea, F.; Dinu, L.D. Evaluating the Efficacy of an Extract for UV Defense and Mitigation of Oxidative Stress, Transitioning from Biomass to Bioprotection. Agronomy 2024, 14, 2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wei, Y.Q.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.N.; Wang, W.W.; Niyati, N.; Guo, Y.L.; Wang, X.F. Chinese caterpillar fungus (Ophiocordyceps sinensis) in China: Current distribution, trading, and futures under climate change and overexploitation. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 755, 142548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Shrestha, U.B.; Bawa, K.S. Impact of Climate Change on Potential Distribution of Chinese Caterpillar Fungus (Ophiocordyceps sinensis) in Nepal Himalaya. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e106405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hopping, K.A.; Chignell, S.M.; Lambin, E.F. The demise of caterpillar fungus in the Himalayan region due to climate change and overharvesting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 11489–11494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shrestha, U.B.; Bawa, K.S. Trade, harvest, and conservation of caterpillar fungus (Ophiocordyceps sinensis) in the Himalayas. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 159, 514–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rao, Z.C.; Cao, L.; Wu, H.; Qiu, X.H.; Liu, G.Q.; Han, R.C. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Thitarodes Armoricanus in Response to the Entomopathogenic Fungi Paecilomyces hepiali and Ophiocordyceps sinensis. Insects 2020, 11, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dan, A.K.; Hu, Y.J.; Chen, R.Y.; Lin, X.Y.; Tian, Y.Q.; Wang, S.Y. Advances in research on chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of Paecilomyces hepiali. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2021, 10, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. He, M.; Tang, C.Y.; Wang, T.; Xiao, M.J.; Li, Y.L.; Li, X.Z. Analysis of Metabolic Profiles and Antioxidant Activity of Chinese Cordyceps, Ophiocordyceps sinensis, and Paecilomyces hepiali Based on Untargeted Metabolomics. Biology 2024, 13, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guan, T.Y.; Li, S.S.; Guan, Q.J.; Shi, J.S.; Lu, Z.M.; Xu, Z.H.; Geng, Y. Spore Powder of Paecilomyces hepiali Shapes Gut Microbiota to Relieve Exercise-Induced Fatigue in Mice. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, K.B.; Wang, F.; Liu, G.J.; Dong, C.H. Effect of Environmental Conditions on Synnema Formation and Nucleoside Production in Cicada Flower, Isaria cicadae (Ascomycetes). Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2019, 21, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Park, H.J. Influence of Culture Conditions on Bioactive Compounds in Cordyceps militaris: A Comprehensive Review. Foods 2025, 14, 3408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ismaiel, M.M.S.; El-Ayouty, Y.M.; Piercey-Normore, M. Role of pH on antioxidants production by Spirulina (Arthrospira) platensis. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Liu, Y.T.; Li, Y.W.; Zhang, H.L.; Li, C.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Liu, A.P.; Chen, H.; Hu, B.; Luo, Q.Y.; Lin, B.K.; et al. Polysaccharides from Cordyceps militaris cultured at different pH: Sugar composition and antioxidant activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Dowhan, W. Molecular genetic approaches to defining lipid function. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, S305–S310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Simons, K. Cell membranes: A subjective perspective. BBA-Biomembranes 2016, 1858, 2569–2572. [Google Scholar]
  21. Santos, A.L.; Preta, G. Lipids in the cell: Organisation regulates function. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 1909–1927. [Google Scholar]
  22. Al’myasheva, N.R.; Sharipova, D.A.; Barkov, A.V.; Karakhanov, E.A.; Kulikov, A.B.; Maksimov, A.L.; Vinokurov, V.A. Lipids of Basidial Fungi as Feedstock for Biodiesel Fuel Production. Chem. Technol. Fuels Oils 2015, 51, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bondarenko, S.A.; Ianutsevich, E.A.; Danilova, O.A.; Grum-Grzhimaylo, A.A.; Kotlova, E.R.; Kamzolkina, O.V.; Bilanenko, E.N.; Tereshina, V.M. Membrane lipids and soluble sugars dynamics of the alkaliphilic fungus Sodiomyces tronii in response to ambient pH. Extremophiles 2017, 21, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ianutsevich, E.A.; Danilova, O.A.; Grum-Grzhimaylo, O.A.; Tereshina, V.M. The Role of Osmolytes and Membrane Lipids in the Adaptation of Acidophilic Fungi. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zuellig, T.; Trötzmüller, M.; Koefeler, H.C. Lipidomics from sample preparation to data analysis: A primer. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 2191–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, J.H.; Kim, S.R.; Kim, S.K.; Kang, H.W. Effects of pH changes on blood physiology, antioxidant responses and Ig M of juvenile olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 21, 100790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rosales-López, C.; Arce-Torres, F.; Monge-Artavia, M.; Rojas-Chaves, M. Evaluation of the Use of Elicitors for the Production of Antioxidant Compounds in Liquid Cultures of Ganoderma curtisii from Costa Rica. Molecules 2022, 27, 4265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gusman, J.K.; Lin, C.Y.; Shih, Y.C. The optimum submerged culture condition of the culinary-medicinal white jelly mushroom (Tremellomycetes) and its antioxidant properties. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2014, 16, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, X.Y.; Xu, G.W. Recent advances in using mass spectrometry for mitochondrial metabolomics and lipidomics—A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1037, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Han, X.L.; Gross, R.W. Shotgun lipidomics: Electrospray ionization mass spectrometric analysis and quantitation of cellular lipidomes directly from crude extracts of biological samples. Mass. Spectrom. Rev. 2005, 24, 367–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Wenk, M.R. The emerging field of lipidomics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005, 4, 594–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, R.X.; Li, B.W.; Lam, S.M.; Shui, G.H. Integration of lipidomics and metabolomics for in-depth understanding of cellular mechanism and disease progression. J. Genet. Genom. 2020, 47, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fahy, E.; Subramaniam, S.; Brown, H.A.; Glass, C.K.; Merrill, A., Jr.; Murphy, R.C.; Raetz, C.R.H.; Russell, D.W.; Seyama, Y.; Shaw, W.; et al. A comprehensive classification system for lipids. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Tech. 2005, 107, 337–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fahy, E.; Subramaniam, S.; Murphy, R.C.; Nishijima, M.; Raetz, C.R.H.; Shimizu, T.; Spener, F.; van Meer, G.; Wakelam, M.J.O.; Dennis, E.A. Update of the LIPID MAPS comprehensive classification system for lipids. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, S9–S14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aguilera-Méndez, A.; Alvarez-Delgado, C.; Hernández-Godinez, D.; Fernandez-Mejia, C. Hepatic Diseases Related to Triglyceride Metabolism. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 1691–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yen, C.L.E.; Stone, S.J.; Koliwad, S.; Harris, C.; Farese, R.V. DGAT enzymes and triacylglycerol biosynthesis. J. Lipid Res. 2008, 49, 2283–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Walther, T.C.; Farese, R.V. The life of lipid droplets. BBA-Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2009, 1791, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xiao, M.J.; Wang, T.; Tang, C.Y.; He, M.; Li, Y.L.; Li, X.Z. Evaluation of Lipid Changes During the Drying Process of Cordyceps sinensis by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS)-Based Lipidomics Technique. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dickson, R.C.; Sumanasekera, C.; Lester, R.L. Functions and metabolism of sphingolipids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Prog. Lipid Res. 2006, 45, 447–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tani, M. Structure-Function Relationship of Complex Sphingolipids in Yeast. Trends Glycosci. Glycotechnol. 2016, 28, E109–E116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sasaki, H.; Arai, H.; Cocco, M.J.; White, S.H. pH Dependence of Sphingosine Aggregation. Biophys. J. 2009, 96, 2727–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sweeney, E.A.; Igarashi, Y. Increases in Ceramide Levels in Normal Human Mesangial Cells Subjected to Different Cellular Stresses Result from Changes in Distinct Enzyme Activities and Can Influence Cellular Responses to Other Stimuli. J. Biochem. 1999, 125, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sun, W.; Jin, J.F.; Xu, R.J.; Hu, W.; Szulc, Z.M.; Bielawski, J.; Obeid, L.M.; Mao, C.G. Substrate Specificity, Membrane Topology, and Activity Regulation of Human Alkaline Ceramidase 2 (ACER2). J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 8995–9007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ueda, N. A Rheostat of Ceramide and Sphingosine-1-Phosphate as a Determinant of Oxidative Stress-Mediated Kidney Injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4010. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kajiwara, K.; Muneoka, T.; Watanabe, Y.; Karashima, T.; Kitagaki, H.; Funato, K. Perturbation of sphingolipid metabolism induces endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis in budding yeast. Mol. Microbiol. 2012, 86, 1246–1261. [Google Scholar]
  46. Niles, B.J.; Joslin, A.C.; Fresques, T.; Powers, T. TOR Complex 2-Ypk1 Signaling Maintains Sphingolipid Homeostasis by Sensing and Regulating ROS Accumulation. Cell Rep. 2014, 6, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Comparison of the antioxidant capacities of S. hepiali cultured under different initial pH conditions. (A) Catalase (CAT) activity; (B) Glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity; (C) Peroxidase (POD) activity; (D) Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity; (E) Flavonoid content; (F) Total phenolic (TP) content; (G) Ascorbic acid (AsA) content; (H) Reduced glutathione (GSH) content; (I) Hydroxyl radical (•OH) scavenging rate; (J) 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH•) scavenging rate; (K) Total antioxidant capacity (ABTS assay); (L) Total antioxidant capacity (FRAP assay); (M) Correlation analysis of the evaluated indicators. * indicates p < 0.05, ** indicates p < 0.01. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between the treatment groups (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05). The x-axis represents the initial pH of the culture medium.
Figure 1. Comparison of the antioxidant capacities of S. hepiali cultured under different initial pH conditions. (A) Catalase (CAT) activity; (B) Glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity; (C) Peroxidase (POD) activity; (D) Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity; (E) Flavonoid content; (F) Total phenolic (TP) content; (G) Ascorbic acid (AsA) content; (H) Reduced glutathione (GSH) content; (I) Hydroxyl radical (•OH) scavenging rate; (J) 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH•) scavenging rate; (K) Total antioxidant capacity (ABTS assay); (L) Total antioxidant capacity (FRAP assay); (M) Correlation analysis of the evaluated indicators. * indicates p < 0.05, ** indicates p < 0.01. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between the treatment groups (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05). The x-axis represents the initial pH of the culture medium.
Jof 12 00367 g001
Figure 2. Lipid identification in S. hepiali. (A) Lipid classification; (B) Venn diagram of identified lipids across the four sample groups.
Figure 2. Lipid identification in S. hepiali. (A) Lipid classification; (B) Venn diagram of identified lipids across the four sample groups.
Jof 12 00367 g002
Figure 3. (A) PCA score plot. PC1 and PC2 represent the variances explained by the first and second principal components, respectively; (B1B3) OPLS-DA score plots for the comparisons of pH 4 vs. pH 5, pH 6 vs. pH 5, and pH 7 vs. pH 5, respectively; (C1C3) OPLS-DA validation (permutation test) plots for pH 4 vs. pH 5, pH 6 vs. pH 5, and pH 7 vs. pH 5, respectively. The vertical axis displays the frequency of the model classification performance over 200 random permutations, and the horizontal axis represents the R2 and Q2 values of the models.
Figure 3. (A) PCA score plot. PC1 and PC2 represent the variances explained by the first and second principal components, respectively; (B1B3) OPLS-DA score plots for the comparisons of pH 4 vs. pH 5, pH 6 vs. pH 5, and pH 7 vs. pH 5, respectively; (C1C3) OPLS-DA validation (permutation test) plots for pH 4 vs. pH 5, pH 6 vs. pH 5, and pH 7 vs. pH 5, respectively. The vertical axis displays the frequency of the model classification performance over 200 random permutations, and the horizontal axis represents the R2 and Q2 values of the models.
Jof 12 00367 g003
Figure 4. Analysis of the differentially accumulated lipids (DALs) in S. hepiali under different pH conditions. (A) Venn diagram of the DALs among the pH 4 vs. pH 5, pH 6 vs. pH 5, and pH 7 vs. pH 5 comparison groups; (B) Pie chart illustrating the subclass distribution of the shared DALs; (C) Hierarchical clustering heatmap of the shared DALs; (D) K-means clustering analysis of the shared DALs. The x-axis represents the sample groups, and the y-axis indicates the standardized relative lipid abundances.
Figure 4. Analysis of the differentially accumulated lipids (DALs) in S. hepiali under different pH conditions. (A) Venn diagram of the DALs among the pH 4 vs. pH 5, pH 6 vs. pH 5, and pH 7 vs. pH 5 comparison groups; (B) Pie chart illustrating the subclass distribution of the shared DALs; (C) Hierarchical clustering heatmap of the shared DALs; (D) K-means clustering analysis of the shared DALs. The x-axis represents the sample groups, and the y-axis indicates the standardized relative lipid abundances.
Jof 12 00367 g004
Figure 5. Analysis of environmental pH-driven differential lipid metabolism in S. hepiali. (AC) Volcano plots for the pH 4 vs. pH 5, pH 6 vs. pH 5, and pH 7 vs. pH 5 comparison groups, respectively. Red dots indicate significantly up-regulated lipids, whereas green dots represent significantly down-regulated lipids; (DF) Hierarchical clustering heatmaps of the top 20 differential lipids in each comparison group. The color scale from green to red indicates relative lipid abundances ranging from low to high.
Figure 5. Analysis of environmental pH-driven differential lipid metabolism in S. hepiali. (AC) Volcano plots for the pH 4 vs. pH 5, pH 6 vs. pH 5, and pH 7 vs. pH 5 comparison groups, respectively. Red dots indicate significantly up-regulated lipids, whereas green dots represent significantly down-regulated lipids; (DF) Hierarchical clustering heatmaps of the top 20 differential lipids in each comparison group. The color scale from green to red indicates relative lipid abundances ranging from low to high.
Jof 12 00367 g005
Figure 6. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the differential lipids. (A) pH 4 vs. pH 5; (B) pH 6 vs. pH 5; (C) pH 7 vs. pH 5. The x-axis represents the enrichment factor corresponding to each pathway, and the y-axis represents the pathway names (sorted by p-value). The color of the dots reflects the p-value, with redder colors indicating a higher significance of enrichment.
Figure 6. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the differential lipids. (A) pH 4 vs. pH 5; (B) pH 6 vs. pH 5; (C) pH 7 vs. pH 5. The x-axis represents the enrichment factor corresponding to each pathway, and the y-axis represents the pathway names (sorted by p-value). The color of the dots reflects the p-value, with redder colors indicating a higher significance of enrichment.
Jof 12 00367 g006
Figure 7. Overview of the metabolic network illustrating the responses of key lipid molecules in the sphingolipid metabolism pathway to pH variation. Red circles indicate significantly altered metabolites; white circles represent undetected metabolites; red rectangles denote significantly up-regulated metabolites between groups; blue rectangles denote significantly down-regulated metabolites between groups; and solid arrows represent promotive effects.
Figure 7. Overview of the metabolic network illustrating the responses of key lipid molecules in the sphingolipid metabolism pathway to pH variation. Red circles indicate significantly altered metabolites; white circles represent undetected metabolites; red rectangles denote significantly up-regulated metabolites between groups; blue rectangles denote significantly down-regulated metabolites between groups; and solid arrows represent promotive effects.
Jof 12 00367 g007
Table 1. The exact names and catalog numbers of the aforementioned kits.
Table 1. The exact names and catalog numbers of the aforementioned kits.
Measured IndicatorsFull NameCatalog Number
CATCatalase (CAT) assay kitCAT-2-Y
GPX-Pxglutathione peroxidase (enzymatic method) assay kitGPX-2-W
PODperoxidase (POD) assay kitGPX-2-W
SODsuperoxide dismutase (SOD) assay kitSOD-2-Y
TPtotal phenolics (TP) assay kitTP-2-G
flavonoidsPlant flavonoid assay kitLHT-2-G
AsAreduced ascorbic acid (AsA) content assay kitASA-2-W
GSHreduced glutathione (GSH) assay kitGSH-2-W
total antioxidant capacity (ABTS)total antioxidant capacity (ABTS) assay kitABTS-2-D
total antioxidant capacity (FRAP)total antioxidant capacity (FRAP) assay kitFRAP-2-G
the scavenging rates of •OHhydroxyl radical scavenging capacity assay kitQZQ-2-G
the scavenging rates of DPPH• total antioxidant capacity (DPPH method) assay kitDPPH-1-D
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tong, Y.; Tang, C.; Jia, B.; Tang, H.; Yan, J.; Li, Y.; Li, X. Effects of Different Initial pH Conditions on the Antioxidant Capacity and Lipidomic Profiles of Samsoniella hepialid. J. Fungi 2026, 12, 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12050367

AMA Style

Tong Y, Tang C, Jia B, Tang H, Yan J, Li Y, Li X. Effects of Different Initial pH Conditions on the Antioxidant Capacity and Lipidomic Profiles of Samsoniella hepialid. Journal of Fungi. 2026; 12(5):367. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12050367

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tong, Yan, Chuyu Tang, Bing Jia, Haoxu Tang, Jinxuan Yan, Yuling Li, and Xiuzhang Li. 2026. "Effects of Different Initial pH Conditions on the Antioxidant Capacity and Lipidomic Profiles of Samsoniella hepialid" Journal of Fungi 12, no. 5: 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12050367

APA Style

Tong, Y., Tang, C., Jia, B., Tang, H., Yan, J., Li, Y., & Li, X. (2026). Effects of Different Initial pH Conditions on the Antioxidant Capacity and Lipidomic Profiles of Samsoniella hepialid. Journal of Fungi, 12(5), 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12050367

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop