Next Article in Journal
New Chaetoglobosins with Fungicidal Activity from Chaetomium sp. UJN-EF006 Endophytic in Vaccinium bracteatum
Previous Article in Journal
The Transcription Factor SsSR Mediates Ergosterol Biosynthesis and Virulence in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Previous Article in Special Issue
Morphology and Phylogeny Reveal New Species and Records of Diplodia, Dothiorella, and Phaeobotryon Associated with Tree Cankers in Xizang, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Growth-Promoting Effects of Dark Septate Endophytes Fungus Acrocalymma on Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)

1
The Rural Development Academy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology and Breeding, Institute of Pesticide and Environmental Toxicology, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
3
College of Advanced Agriculture Sciences, Zhejiang Agricultural and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China
4
Zhejiang Provincial Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou 310003, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Fungi 2025, 11(7), 510; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11070510
Submission received: 30 May 2025 / Revised: 2 July 2025 / Accepted: 4 July 2025 / Published: 7 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research of Ascomycota)

Abstract

This study investigates the potential role of Acrocalymma dark septate endophytic (DSE) fungi in promoting the growth of Solanum lycopersicum (tomato). Recognized as important symbionts that enhance plant growth and resilience under stress, particularly Acrocalymma species, DSE fungi were the focus of this investigation. Specifically, four stains isolated from gramineous plant roots (Acrocalymma sp. E00677, Acrocalymma vagum E00690, Acrocalymma chuxiongense E01299A, and Acrocalymma chuxiongense E01299B) were examined. Morphological characteristics were observed using three different media, confirming typical DSE traits such as dark pigmentation and septate hyphae. Phylogenetic analysis using six genetic markers (ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1, rpb2, and tub2) placed the strains within the Acrocalymma genus. Co-culture test and physiological index measurements showed that all strains significantly enhanced root development, as evidenced by an increased root-to-shoot ratio and a higher number of lateral roots. Additionally, the Acrocalymma DSE strains elevated chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll content, suggesting improved photosynthetic efficiency. Anthocyanin levels were also increased in the tomato leaves, indicating enhanced antioxidative defense mechanisms. Among these strains, Acrocalymma vagum E00690 exhibited the most substantial effect on root activity. The widespread presence of 325 Acrocalymma isolates from 25 countries underscores its broad ecological adaptability. These findings suggest that Acrocalymma DSE fungi positively influence tomato growth, with potential implications for improving plant resilience under environmental stress. This study highlights the importance of further exploring DSEs, particularly Acrocalymma fungi, to better understand their ecological roles in agricultural practices, particularly in tomato cultivation.

1. Introduction

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the most widely cultivated and economically important crops worldwide, with a global production exceeding 180 million metric tons in 2022 (http://www.fao.org/faostat, accessed on 28 May 2025). As a key horticultural crop, it plays a vital role in global food security and agricultural economies, supporting both fresh markets and the processed food industry [1,2]. Due to its high economic value and widespread cultivation, tomato has become a major focus of agricultural research, particularly in efforts to enhance yield, improve stress tolerance, and promote sustainable production [3,4,5,6]. However, tomato cultivation is frequently challenged by various biotic and abiotic stresses [7,8,9,10]. Pathogens such as Fusarium oxysporum and Ralstonia solanacearum pose serious threats to plant health, leading to significant yield losses [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Additionally, environmental factors like drought and soil salinity further constrain tomato production, underscoring the urgent need for sustainable strategies to enhance plant growth and resilience [17,18,19]. In this regard, beneficial microorganisms, particularly dark septate endophytes (DSEs), have gained increasing attention for their potential to improve plant health, enhance stress tolerance, and promote overall agricultural sustainability [20,21,22,23].
Dark septate endophytes (DSEs), a major group of Ascomycetous endophytes, are characterized by melanized septate hyphae and microsclerotia in plant roots [18,24,25,26]. These root-associated fungi are widely distributed across various crops, where they contribute to plant growth by improving nutrient uptake, modulating phytohormones, and increasing stress tolerance [3,17,27,28,29]. Notably, DSEs have been reported in wheat, rice, maize, and tomato, where they enhance biomass accumulation and disease resistance [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Although less studied than mycorrhizal fungi, growing evidence suggests that DSE play a significant role in sustainable agriculture. Among them, the genus Acrocalymma has been identified as a plant endophyte with potential growth-promoting effects [26,39,40,41,42]. However, its specific function in crop production remains largely unexplored, warranting further investigation.
The beneficial effects of DSEs on plant growth can be attributed to multiple mechanisms. First, DSEs enhance nutrient acquisition by solubilizing insoluble forms of essential elements such as nitrogen and phosphorus, thereby improving plant nutrient availability [43,44,45,46]. Second, they influence phytohormone levels, including auxins, gibberellins, and abscisic acid, which regulate root architecture and overall biomass accumulation [47,48,49,50]. Third, DSEs contribute to abiotic stress tolerance by enhancing water use efficiency and modulating antioxidant enzyme activities, thereby improving plant resilience to drought and salinity [51,52,53]. Additionally, some DSEs can suppress pathogens through competition or by inducing systemic resistance in host plants [36,54,55]. Collectively, these mechanisms make DSEs promising candidates for sustainable agricultural practices aimed at improving crop productivity under both optimal and stressful conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Fungal Isolation

Plant samples (Eleusine indica and Oryza meyeriana) were collected at 101.576° E, 21.555° N in the core area of the Naban River Nature Reserve, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province, China. The roots of gramineous plants were surface sterilized in 75% ethanol for 30 s, followed by 1% sodium hypochlorite for 3 min, and then rinsed three times with sterilized water to remove any residual disinfectants. The sterilized root segments were cut into approximately 0.5 cm pieces and placed on potato dextrose agar (PDA) supplemented with chloramphenicol (50 mg/L) to inhibit bacterial contamination [56]. The plates were incubated at 25 °C in the dark for 5–7 days, and emerging fungal colonies were transferred onto fresh PDA plates for purification [57]. Morphologically distinct fungal isolates were further subcultured until pure cultures were obtained.

2.2. Morphological Characterization

The purified fungal isolates were cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA; 10 g potato infusion powder, 20 g dextrose, 0.1 g chloramphenicol, and 13 g agar per liter), malt extract agar (MEA; 34 g malt extract and 15 g agar per liter), and oatmeal agar (OMA; 30 g oatmeal and 15 g agar per liter) and incubated at 25 °C for 7–14 days to observe colony characteristics, including color, texture, and growth pattern. Colony appearances were photographed using a Canon EOS 700D digital camera (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Microscopic (Leica DM2500, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) features were examined by observation under a light microscope (×400, ×1000 magnification). Morphological features such as hyphal structure and conidia were recorded [57].

2.3. Molecular Identification

The isolated DSE was identified as Acrocalymma spp. through molecular characterization. Fresh fungal mycelia from pure cultures grown on PDA at 25 °C for 5 to 7 days were used for genomic DNA extraction, following the protocol provided by the DNA extraction kit (Zhejiang Shangya Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China). PCR amplification was conducted as described by Liu et al. [58], targeting multiple genetic regions, including the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) [59], partial large subunit nuclear rDNA (LSU) [60], partial small subunit nuclear rDNA (SSU) [59], RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2) [61], translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1) [61,62], and β-tubulin (tub2) [61,63], using the primers listed in Table 1. PCR reactions were performed in a Veriti 96-well thermal cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Shanghai, China) with a total volume of 20 μL, containing 2× Phanta Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), 0.1 μM of each primer, and 10 ng of genomic DNA. The amplified products were purified and sequenced by Zhejiang Shangya Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, China). PCR products were purified and sequenced, and the obtained sequences were compared with reference sequences in the NCBI GenBank database using BLAST (version 2.16.0) (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 15 May 2025) analysis for species confirmation. The identified fungal strains were deposited in the General Microbiology Center of the Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center (GDMCC), Guangzhou, China, under the preservation numbers CDMCC No. 63140 (Acrocalymma sp. E00677), CDMCC No. 63141 (Acrocalymma vagum E00690), CDMCC No. 63143 (Acrocalymma chuxiongense E01299A), and CDMCC No. 63153 (Acrocalymma chuxiongense E01299B).

2.4. Phylogenetic Analyses

Phylogenetic analysis was performed using the PhyloSuite platform v1.2.3 [64]. In brief, sequences from the ITS, LSU, SSU, rpb2, tef1, and tub2 regions were aligned using MAFFT v7.505 [65], followed by trimming and concatenation. Taxa lacking one or more loci were retained in the concatenated alignment. Missing sequences were treated as gaps (‘?’), and phylogenetic inference was conducted using partition-aware models in IQ-TREE v2.2.0 and MrBayes v3.2.7a, which can accommodate incomplete data matrices without excluding taxa. The optimal partition model was determined using ModelFinder v2.2.0 [66] based on the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees were constructed with IQ-TREE [67] under the edge-linked partition model, with 5000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates [68]. Bayesian inference (BI) analysis was conducted in MrBayes [69] using the same partition model, with the first 25% of sampled data discarded as burn in. The generated phylogenetic trees were visualized in FigTree v1.4.3, with ML bootstrap values (MLBS) above 75% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BYPP) exceeding 0.95 displayed at the nodes. The final phylogram was edited using Adobe Illustrator v.27.5 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

2.5. Evaluation of Plant Growth Promotion by Endophytic Strains Under Greenhouse Conditions

To evaluate the growth-promoting effects of Acrocalymma spp., a co-culture experiment was conducted using tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) ‘Daianna’ seedlings. Tomato seeds were surface sterilized with 75% ethanol for 30 s, followed by 0.5% sodium hypochlorite for 15 min, and then rinsed three times with sterile distilled water [10]. After sterilization, seeds were placed on sterilized and dried filter paper and allowed to air dry under a laminar flow hood. Sterilized seeds were germinated on moist filter paper in Petri dishes at 25 °C in the dark for 3 days.
For fungal inoculation, Acrocalymma spp. was first cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 25 °C for 7 days. Mycelial plugs (5 mm diameter) were then placed near the roots of 7-day-old tomato seedlings grown in sterilized vermiculite under controlled conditions. Non-inoculated seedlings served as controls. Plants were placed in a 1/2 MS medium (Murashige & Skoog) plate. All the inoculation processes were carried out on a clean bench, and all the dishes were kept in a growth chamber with a 16 h/8 h photoperiod, temperature of 25 °C/22 °C (day/night), and 60% mean air relative humidity. The duration of the stress experiment was 3 weeks.

2.6. Physiological Indexes Measurement

To evaluate the effects of Acrocalymma isolates on tomato growth, physiological and morphological parameters were measured after 21 days of co-cultivation. Tomato seedlings were carefully uprooted, and lateral roots were gently washed with sterile distilled water to remove residual substrate.

2.6.1. Morphological Measurements

Growth parameters, including shoot height, root length, root number, shoot biomass, root biomass, and root-to-shoot ratio, were recorded. Root-to-shoot ratio was calculated as root fresh weight divided by shoot fresh weight.

2.6.2. Physiological and Biochemical Analyses

Chlorophyll and carotenoid content were determined using the 95% ethanol extraction method, with absorbance measured at 470 nm, 649 nm, and 665 nm [70]. Anthocyanin content was quantified following the acidic methanol extraction method, with absorbance recorded at 530 nm and 637 nm [71]. Root vitality was assessed using the TTC (triphenyl tetrazolium chloride) reduction assay, with absorbance measured at 485 nm [72]. Each treatment was replicated three times, and statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the effects of fungal inoculation on tomato growth and physiology.

2.7. Geographic Coordinates Analysis

To comprehensively analyze the diversity and geographical distribution of Acrocalymma species, a meta-analysis was conducted using available records from public databases. Geographic coordinate information of representative Acrocalymma species and closely related genera were retrieved from the NCBI GenBank database. Geographic coordinates, when available, were mapped to visualize the worldwide occurrence of Acrocalymma species [73]. The distribution patterns were further processed and displayed using the online platform ChiPlot (https://www.chiplot.online/, accessed on 6 April 2025) to generate heatmaps and spatial distribution graphs. This meta-analysis provides a broader perspective on the ecological and evolutionary aspects of Acrocalymma.

2.8. Statistics and Analysis

The correlations among the different variables were analyzed using the Pearson coefficient. Statistical data were plotted using GraphPad Prism 9. All experimental data, including root biomass, shoot biomass, root-to-shoot ratio, lateral roots number, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, anthocyanin content, and root vitality, were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to evaluate the effects of Acrocalymma inoculation on tomato growth. Treatment (inoculated vs. non-inoculated) and individual fungal isolates were considered as independent factors. Post hoc multiple comparisons were performed using Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test to determine significant differences among treatments. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (v.26.0, IBM, New York, NY, USA), with significance set at p < 0.05. Results are presented as mean ± standard error (SE), and graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism (v.9.0, GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Characteristics of Isolated DSE

In total, 16 fungal isolates were obtained from the roots of gramineous plants collected in the Naban River Nature Reserve, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province, China. Combining morphological characteristics with ITS sequences, the 16 fungal isolates were identified as 4 fungal strains, which belong to Acrocalymma. The colonies grown on PDA, MEA, and OMA exhibited slow to moderate growth, with darkly pigmented, cottony to velvety textures (Figure 1). On the PDA plates, isolate E00677 exhibited a compact growth pattern, closely adhering to the medium surface, with fine hyphae forming a tough, resilient colony surface. In contrast, isolates E00690, E01299A, and E01299B displayed dense hyphal growth with a grayish, short-velvety appearance. On MEA, E00677 formed white, long-filamentous hyphae, while E00690 developed grayish-brown hyphae with a white colony margin. Isolate E01299A produced white to light brown colonies with distinct concentric ring patterns, whereas E01299B exhibited a gray, felt-like colony morphology. On OMA, E00677 displayed sparse, light brown hyphae, whereas E00690 formed a grayish-white, short-velvety colony. E01299A and E01299B exhibited light brown to brown colonies with concentric ring patterns. The colonies grew slowly, only reaching 6 cm in diameter after 1 month of culturing under 25 ± 2 °C in 16/8 light and darkness. No sexual or asexual spores were observed.

3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

The concatenated alignment used for phylogenetic analysis included 37 sequences (Table 2), consisting of 6633 positions with 1323 distinct patterns, 938 parsimony-informative sites, 552 singleton sites, and 5143 constant sites, including gaps. The aligned regions were distributed as follows: SSU (positions 1–1423), LSU (1424–2794), ITS (2795–3281), tef1 (3282–4223), rpb2 (4224–5289), and tub2 (5290–6633). Model selection using ModelFinder identified GTR+I+G and GTR+F+I+G4 as the best-fit models based on the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Since the Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) analyses generated highly consistent topologies, only the ML tree is presented, with ML bootstrap support (MLBS) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BYPP) displayed at the nodes. The phylogenetic analysis confirmed that all four fungal isolates in this study belong to the genus Acrocalymma (Figure 2). Specifically, Acrocalymma sp. E00677 formed an independent branch closely related to A. medicaginis and A. pterocarpi, with strong bootstrap support (100% MLBS, 1.00 BYPP), suggesting that E00677 may represent a novel species within the genus Acrocalymma. A. chuxiongense E01299A and A. chuxiongense E01299B clustered together in a distinct lineage with A chuxiongense. A. vagum E00690 formed an independent branch associated with A. vagum and A. walkeri. These three branches together constituted an independent, well-supported clade (100% MLBS, 1.00 BYPP), indicating robust phylogenetic placement. Byssothecium circinans CBS 675.92 and Massarina eburnea CBS 473.64 were chosen as the outgroup.

3.3. Effect of Acrocalymma Inoculation on Physiological Indexes

The co-cultivation experiments demonstrated that four Acrocalymma isolates significantly promoted the growth and physiological performance of Solanum lycopersicum ‘Daianna’ seedlings, with distinct effects observed among different isolates (Figure 3).

3.3.1. Root Development and Biomass Allocation

Acrocalymma sp. E00677 significantly enhanced lateral root formation, with the number of lateral roots increasing by 53.77% compared with the non-inoculated control (1.54-fold of the control) (Figure 4D). This indicates an expanded root system that improves nutrient and water absorption efficiency. Although Acrocalymma sp. E00677 slightly reduced the average root biomass (by 1.34%), it significantly increased the root-to-shoot ratio by 53.90% (1.54-fold of the control), suggesting enhanced root development relative to shoot growth, which contributes to better plant stability and resource uptake (Figure 4A,B). A. chuxiongense E01299A and A. chuxiongense E01299B also promoted root system development, with A. chuxiongense E01299A increasing lateral root number by 36.66% (1.37-fold of the control) and A. chuxiongense E01299B by 53.77% (1.54-fold of the control). Notably, A. chuxiongense E01299A demonstrated the strongest effect on root-to-shoot ratio, increasing it by 125.04% (2.25-fold of the control), while A. chuxiongense E01299B increased it by 90.17% (1.90-fold of the control), indicating a shift in biomass allocation favoring root development (Figure 4C).

3.3.2. Photosynthetic Pigments and Stress-Related Compounds

Inoculation with Acrocalymma sp. E00677 significantly increased chlorophyll content, with chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll levels rising by 9.28%, 18.18%, and 7.76%, respectively, compared with the control (Figure 4E–G). A. chuxiongense E01299A induced even greater increases, elevating chlorophyll a by 32.12%, chlorophyll b by 50.85% (1.51-fold of the control), and total chlorophyll by 34.39%. A. chuxiongense E01299B also enhanced chlorophyll accumulation, increasing chlorophyll a by 23.64%, chlorophyll b by 31.50% (1.31-fold of the control), and total chlorophyll by 23.51%, indicating improved photosynthetic efficiency.

3.3.3. Anthocyanin Accumulation

Anthocyanin content, an indicator of oxidative stress tolerance, significantly increased following inoculation. Acrocalymma sp. E00677 treatment led to a 37.52% increase, whereas A. chuxiongense E01299A resulted in the highest accumulation (87.18%, 1.87-fold of the control), suggesting enhanced antioxidant potential. A. chuxiongense E01299B also increased anthocyanin levels by 33.75% (Figure 4H).

3.3.4. Root Vitality

Root vitality assessed via the TTC reduction assay showed a moderate yet significant enhancement in Acrocalymma chuxiongense E01299A and A. chuxiongense E01299B treatments (5.77% increase), indicating improved root metabolic activity.
These findings confirm that Acrocalymma species, particularly Acrocalymma sp. E00677, A. vagum E00690, A. chuxiongense E01299A, and A. chuxiongense E01299B, act as growth-promoting endophytes in tomato. The observed improvements in root system architecture, chlorophyll content, anthocyanin accumulation, and root vitality highlight their potential for sustainable agriculture, offering promising applications for enhancing crop resilience and productivity under both optimal and stress conditions (Figure 4I).

3.4. Global Distribution and Ecological Adaptability on Acrocalymma

A meta-analysis of publicly available sequence records revealed that Acrocalymma species are widely distributed across the globe. Our dataset included 325 isolates from 25 countries, underscoring the broad geographic range and ecological plasticity of this fungal genus (Table S1). Most reported isolations were derived from plant-associated environments, particularly the root tissues of various crops and woody plants. The global distribution map (Figure 5) shows that Acrocalymma occurs predominantly in Asia, Europe, and North America, with additional reports in Africa, South America, and Oceania, indicating that this genus thrives under diverse climatic and ecological conditions. Its presence across multiple biomes—from temperate forests to tropical agricultural systems—further supports its ecological flexibility and capacity to colonize a wide range of environmental niches. These findings highlight Acrocalymma as a globally distributed, endophytic, and plant-associated fungal genus with potential roles in plant health, stress resilience, and sustainable agriculture. Further research is warranted to explore its functional diversity and interactions with host plants across different ecosystems.

4. Discussion

Dark septate endophytes play a vital role in plant nutrient absorption, growth, and defense, forming an essential component of the ecosystem [74]. In this study, four DSE fungi were isolated from the roots of gramineous plants and identified as belonging to the genus Acrocalymma. Fungi of this genus have been previously reported to form symbiotic relationships with various host plants, acting as DSEs that contribute to enhanced plant growth and development, as well as increased tolerance to both biotic and abiotic stresses [22,26,32,39,40,41,42].
Phylogenetic analysis is currently one of the most important approaches for determining species classification. To further explore the phylogenetic relationships of the four Acrocalymma strains, we conducted a combined analysis of six genetic markers: ITS, LSU, SSU, rpb2, tef1, and tub2. The results confirmed that the four strains are closely related within the Acrocalymma genus, providing valuable insights into the evolutionary relationships within this group [75]. Notably, strain E00690 exhibited a close phylogenetic relationship with Acrocalymma vagum, suggesting a high degree of genetic similarity [76]. This close affinity may indicate shared ecological roles and functional properties, warranting further studies to explore their common traits and environmental adaptability [53]. Additionally, the phylogenetic analysis offers a solid foundation for future taxonomic studies within the Acrocalymma genus, contributing to a better understanding of its ecological significance and functional diversity [77,78,79].
An important approach to evaluating the functional roles of dark septate endophytic (DSE) fungi is by assessing their phenotypic effects on host plant growth. In addition, we assessed the growth-promoting effects of DSE strains E00677, E00690, E01299A, and E01299B by co-cultivating them with aseptically grown Solanum lycopersicum ‘Daianna’ seedlings. Our results demonstrated that all four DSE strains significantly enhanced tomato growth, particularly by promoting root development, as evidenced by an increased root-to-shoot ratio and a greater number of lateral roots. The increase in plant biomass suggests that DSE fungi may help host plants accumulate more organic matter, potentially enabling them to better withstand prolonged periods of high temperatures and drought stress—conditions frequently encountered in their natural environments [80]. Improvements were also observed in several physiological parameters of the shoots, including increased levels of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll, which suggests a role for these DSE fungi in enhancing photosynthetic capacity [81]. A higher chlorophyll content is typically associated with an enhanced ability to capture light energy, thereby improving the efficiency of photosynthesis [82]. This increased photosynthetic activity can lead to the greater production of sugars and other essential metabolites, ultimately supporting better growth and development [83]. Consequently, the observed increase in chlorophyll content in plants treated with these DSE strains may contribute to enhanced biomass accumulation and overall plant vigor.
Furthermore, all four strains elevated the anthocyanin content in the leaves, which may indicate an improved antioxidative defense system or enhanced tolerance to environmental stress [84]. Anthocyanins are known to act as protective pigments involved in mitigating oxidative damage caused by abiotic stress factors such as UV radiation, high temperatures, and drought. By scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS), anthocyanins help protect plant cells from oxidative damage to membranes, proteins, and nucleic acids [85,86]. Additionally, anthocyanins may regulate plant growth by modulating hormonal responses and improving nutrient uptake [87]. Thus, the increased anthocyanin levels observed in the leaves could enhance stress resilience and overall plant health, promoting better growth under challenging environmental conditions.
Among the strains, Acrocalymma vagum E00690 exhibited the most pronounced effect on enhancing root activity. Increased root activity plays a crucial role in improving the plant’s ability to absorb water and nutrients from the soil, particularly under stress conditions. A more active root system can improve the uptake of essential minerals and organic compounds, supporting better plant growth and development [88]. Furthermore, increased root vigor is associated with greater root biomass and a more extensive root network, which can help plants establish stronger anchorage in the soil and access a wider soil volume for nutrient acquisition [38]. This enhanced root activity, therefore, contributes to overall plant vigor, improved stress tolerance, and potentially higher biomass accumulation, supporting optimal plant growth [89].
The role of DSEs in promoting tomato growth has been a topic of significant interest [90]. Our review reveals that Acrocalymma species are distributed in 25 countries worldwide, particularly in regions with extensive tomato cultivation. Based on the results of this study, we conclude that DSE fungi play a positive role in promoting host plant growth. Furthermore, this study highlights the need for an increased focus on endophytic fungi, particularly DSEs, to better understand their ecological roles and adaptive functions in tomato growth.

5. Conclusions

This study highlights the significant role of Acrocalymma strains as dark septate endophytic (DSE) fungi in promoting tomato growth. An examination of the growth morphology on different media confirmed that all four strains exhibit typical DSE colony characteristics, such as dark pigmentation and septate hyphae, supporting their classification as DSE fungi. A phylogenetic analysis based on six genetic markers (ITS, LSU, SSU, rpb2, tef1, and tub2) confirmed their placement within the Acrocalymma genus, offering insights into their evolutionary relationships. All four isolates significantly enhanced growth parameters, including root development, chlorophyll content, and anthocyanin levels, underscoring their positive impact on plant physiological functions. These findings suggest that DSE fungi, especially Acrocalymma species, could provide a natural strategy to enhance plant resilience under stress conditions. The widespread distribution of Acrocalymma across 25 countries further highlights the genus’s broad ecological adaptability. This study also emphasizes the need for a further exploration of endophytic fungi, particularly DSEs, to deepen our understanding of their ecological roles and explore their potential applications in sustainable agriculture, particularly in tomato cultivation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof11070510/s1, Table S1: map coordinates of Acrocalymma.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.F., Y.Z. and H.W.; methodology, X.F., Y.J., and Z.Z.; software, X.F., Y.J., and Z.Z.; validation, X.F.; writing—original draft preparation, X.F.; writing—review and editing, X.F.; visualization, X.F.; supervision, X.F., Y.Z. and H.W.; project administration, X.F. and Y.Z.; funding acquisition, X.F. and Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Zhejiang Provincial Key Research and Development Program of China (grant nos. 2020C02027) and General Scientific Research Project of Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education (Y202249712).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gao, L.; Gonda, I.; Sun, H.; Ma, Q.; Bao, K.; Tieman, D.M.; Burzynski-Chang, E.A.; Fish, T.L.; Stromberg, K.A.; Sacks, G.L.; et al. The tomato pan-genome uncovers new genes and a rare allele regulating fruit flavor. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 1044–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sarmiento-Lopez, L.G.; Lopez-Espinoza, M.Y.; Juarez-Verdayes, M.A.; Lopez-Meyer, M. Genome-wide characterization of the xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase gene family in Solanum lycopersicum L. and gene expression analysis in response to arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Peerj 2023, 11, e15257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Argentel-Martinez, L.; Penuelas-Rubio, O.; Amador, C.A.; Steiner, F.; Aguilera, J.G.; Shin, J.H.; Zuffo, A.M.; Ratke, R.F.; Teodoro, P.E.; Azizoglu, U. Mitigating salinity stress on tomato growth, water regime, gas exchange, and yield with the application of QuitoMax. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 31755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Santos, M.; Cesanelli, I.; Diánez, F.; Sánchez-Montesinos, B.; Moreno-Gavíra, A. Advances in the role of dark septate endophytes in the plant resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Guo, M.; Yang, F.; Zhu, L.; Wang, L.; Li, Z.; Qi, Z.; Fotopoulos, V.; Yu, J.; Zhou, J. Loss of cold tolerance is conferred by absence of the WRKY34 promoter fragment during tomato evolution. Nat Commun. 2024, 15, 6667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Becerril-Espinosa, A.; Hernandez-Herrera, R.M.; Meza-Canales, I.D.; Perez-Ramirez, R.; Rodriguez-Zaragoza, F.A.; Mendez-Moran, L.; Sanchez-Hernandez, C.V.; Palmeros-Suarez, P.A.; Palacios, O.A.; Choix, F.J.; et al. Habitat-adapted heterologous symbiont Salinispora arenicola promotes growth and alleviates salt stress in tomato crop plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 920881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shi, Y.; Guo, S.; Zhao, X.; Xu, M.; Xu, J.; Xing, G.; Zhang, Y.; Ahammed, G.J. Comparative physiological and transcriptomics analysis revealed crucial mechanisms of silicon-mediated tolerance to iron deficiency in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1094451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rangseekaew, P.; Barros-Rodriguez, A.; Pathom-Aree, W.; Manzanera, M. Plant Beneficial Deep-Sea Actinobacterium, Dermacoccus abyssi mt1.1T promote growth of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) under salinity stress. Biology 2022, 11, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ntanasi, T.; Karavidas, I.; Zioviris, G.; Ziogas, I.; Karaolani, M.; Fortis, D.; Conesa, M.A.; Schubert, A.; Savvas, D.; Ntatsi, G. Assessment of growth, yield, and nutrient uptake of mediterranean tomato landraces in response to salinity stress. Plants 2023, 12, 3551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, E.; Chao, S.; Shi, B.; Liu, L.; Chen, M.; Zheng, Y.; Feng, X.; Wu, H. Bacillus velezensis ZN-S10 reforms the rhizosphere microbial community and enhances tomato resistance to TPN. Plants 2023, 12, 3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ke, J.; Zhu, W.; Yuan, Y.; Du, X.; Xu, A.; Zhang, D.; Cao, S.; Chen, W.; Lin, Y.; Xie, J.; et al. Duality of immune recognition by tomato and virulence activity of the Ralstonia solanacearum exo-polygalacturonase PehC. Plant Cell 2023, 35, 2552–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhou, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, F.; Liang, J.; Zhao, P.; Tsui, C.; Cai, L. Cross-kingdom synthetic microbiota supports tomato suppression of Fusarium wilt disease. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 7890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Syed, N.R.; Shahzad, R.; Tayade, R.; Shahid, M.; Hussain, A.; Ali, M.W.; Yun, B.W. Evaluation potential of PGPR to protect tomato against Fusarium wilt and promote plant growth. Peerj 2021, 9, e11194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hernandez-Aparicio, F.; Lison, P.; Rodrigo, I.; Belles, J.M.; Lopez-Gresa, M.P. Signaling in the tomato immunity against Fusarium oxysporum. Molecules 2021, 26, 1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Takken, F.; Rep, M. The arms race between tomato and Fusarium oxysporum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010, 11, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Peeters, N.; Guidot, A.; Vailleau, F.; Valls, M. Ralstonia solanacearum, a widespread bacterial plant pathogen in the post-genomic era. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013, 14, 651–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, H.; Huang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Qi, M.; Liu, Y.; Li, T. Photosynthetic response mechanism of soil salinity-induced cross-tolerance to subsequent drought stress in tomato plants. Plants 2020, 9, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Upson, R.; Read, D.J.; Newsham, K.K. Nitrogen form influences the response of Deschampsia antarctica to dark septate root endophytes. Mycorrhiza 2009, 20, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ali, M.; Aboelhasan, F.; Abdelhameed, A.A.; Soudy, F.A.; Eldin, D.D.; Zeinab, I.M.E.; Khalil, R.; El-Absy, K.M.; Kawy, A. Physiological and transcriptomic evaluation of salt tolerance in Egyptian tomato landraces at the seedling stage. BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, L.; Li, T.; Wang, C.; Zhang, X.; Xu, L.; Xu, R.; Zhao, Z. The effects of dark septate endophyte (DSE) inoculation on tomato seedlings under Zn and Cd stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 35232–35241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vergara, C.; Araujo, K.; Urquiaga, S.; Schultz, N.; Balieiro, F.C.; Medeiros, P.S.; Santos, L.A.; Xavier, G.R.; Zilli, J.E. Dark septate endophytic fungi help tomato to acquire nutrients from ground plant material. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gaber, D.A.; Berthelot, C.; Blaudez, D.; Kovacs, G.M.; Franken, P. Impact of dark septate endophytes on salt stress alleviation of tomato plants. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1124879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mahmoud, R.S.; Narisawa, K. A new fungal endophyte, Scolecobasidium humicola, promotes tomato growth under organic nitrogen conditions. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jumpponen, A.; Trappe, J.M. Dark septate endophytes: A review of facultative biotrophic root-colonizing fungi. New Phytol. 1998, 140, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yuan, Z.; Su, Z.; Mao, L.; Peng, Y.; Yang, G.; Lin, F.; Zhang, C. Distinctive endophytic fungal assemblage in stems of wild rice (Oryza granulata) in China with special reference to two species of Muscodor (Xylariaceae). J. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jin, H.; Liu, H.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Q.; Mao, L.; Li, X.; Chen, J.; Lin, F.; Zhang, C. Effect of the dark septate endophytic fungus Acrocalymma vagum on heavy metal content in tobacco leaves. Symbiosis 2018, 74, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ruotsalainen, A.L.; Kauppinen, M.; Wali, P.R.; Saikkonen, K.; Helander, M.; Tuomi, J. Dark septate endophytes: Mutualism from by-products? Trends Plant Sci. 2022, 27, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, J.L.; Li, T.; Liu, G.Y.; Smith, J.M.; Zhao, Z.W. Unraveling the role of dark septate endophyte (DSE) colonizing maize (Zea mays) under cadmium stress: Physiological, cytological and genic aspects. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, M.; Shi, X.; Zhao, Z. Dark septate endophyte (DSE) fungi isolated from metal polluted soils: Their taxonomic position, tolerance, and accumulation of heavy metals in vitro. J. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xie, L.; Bi, Y.; Ma, S.; Shang, J.; Hu, Q.; Christie, P. Combined inoculation with dark septate endophytes and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: Synergistic or competitive growth effects on maize? BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Spagnoletti, F.N.; Chiocchio, V.M. Tolerance of dark septate endophytic fungi (DSE) to agrochemicals in vitro. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2020, 52, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zeng, Y.; Lu, X.; Wang, M.; Chen, R.; Li, Q.; Zhu, J.; Su, Z.; Lin, F. Endophyte Acrocalymma vagum establishes the holobiont with rice to attract beneficial microorganisms and promote disease resistance. J. Adv. Res. 2025; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, S.; Zhang, G.; Liang, X.; Wang, L.; Li, Z.; He, Y.; Li, B.; Zhan, F. A dark septate endophyte improves cadmium tolerance of maize by modifying root morphology and promoting cadmium binding to the cell wall and phosphate. J Fungi. 2023, 9, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Su, Z.Z.; Dai, M.D.; Zhu, J.N.; Liu, X.H.; Li, L.; Zhu, X.M.; Wang, J.Y.; Yuan, Z.L.; Lin, F.C. Dark septate endophyte Falciphora oryzae-assisted alleviation of cadmium in rice. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 419, 126435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Vergara, C.; Araujo, K.; Urquiaga, S.; Santa-Catarina, C.; Schultz, N.; Da, S.A.E.; de Carvalho, B.F.; Xavier, G.R.; Zilli, J.E. Dark septate endophytic fungi increase green manure-15N recovery efficiency, N contents, and micronutrients in rice grains. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Su, Z.Z.; Mao, L.J.; Li, N.; Feng, X.X.; Yuan, Z.L.; Wang, L.W.; Lin, F.C.; Zhang, C.L. Evidence for biotrophic lifestyle and biocontrol potential of dark septate endophyte Harpophora oryzae to rice blast disease. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. He, Y.; Yang, Z.; Li, M.; Jiang, M.; Zhan, F.; Zu, Y.; Li, T.; Zhao, Z. Effects of a dark septate endophyte (DSE) on growth, cadmium content, and physiology in maize under cadmium stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 18494–18504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xiao, Y.; Dai, M.X.; Zhang, G.Q.; Yang, Z.X.; He, Y.M.; Zhan, F.D. Effects of the dark septate endophyte (DSE) Exophiala pisciphila on the growth of root cell wall polysaccharides and the cadmium content of Zea mays L. under cadmium stress. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lalthazuali, E.; Marwein, B.; Sailo, H.; Lalbiaktluanga, P.S.; Vanlalmuana, M.F.; Ralte, L. Enhancing rice growth in adverse conditions: The role of dark septate endophytes in salt and water scarcity tolerance. Mycologia 2025, 117, 546–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. He, C.; Wang, W.; Hou, J. Plant growth and soil microbial impacts of enhancing licorice with inoculating dark septate endophytes under drought stress. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Armengol, J.; Vicent, A.; Martinez-Culebras, P.; Bruton, B.D.; Garcia-Jimnez, J. Identification, occurrence and pathogenicity of Rhizopycnis vagum on muskmelon in Spain. Plant. Pathol. 2003, 52, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Girlanda, M.; Ghignone, S.; Luppi, A.M. Diversity of sterile root-associated fungi of two Mediterranean plants. New Phytol. 2002, 155, 481–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Netherway, T.; Bengtsson, J.; Buegger, F.; Fritscher, J.; Oja, J.; Pritsch, K.; Hildebrand, F.; Krab, E.J.; Bahram, M. Pervasive associations between dark septate endophytic fungi with tree root and soil microbiomes across Europe. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Barresi, O.; Lavado, R.S.; Chiocchio, V.M. Can dark septate endophytic fungi (DSE) mobilize selectively inorganic soil phosphorus thereby promoting sorghum growth? A preliminary study. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2022, 54, 220–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Luo, Q.; Hou, R.; Shang, X.; Li, S. Effects of Phosphorus-dissolving dark septate endophytes on the growth of blueberry. J. Microbiol. 2023, 61, 837–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mikheev, V.S.; Struchkova, I.V.; Ageyeva, M.N.; Brilkina, A.A.; Berezina, E.V. The Role of Phialocephala fortinii in improving plants’ phosphorus nutrition: New puzzle pieces. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, K.; Wen, Z.; Asiegbu, F.O. The dark septate endophyte Phialocephala sphaeroides suppresses conifer pathogen transcripts and promotes root growth of Norway spruce. Tree Physiol. 2022, 42, 2627–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kurczynska, E.U.; Gaj, M.D.; Ujczak, A.; Mazur, E. Histological analysis of direct somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Planta 2007, 226, 619–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gulzar, U.; Hussain, A.; Hamayun, M.; Iqbal, A.; Seleiman, M.F.; Alotaibi, M.; Lee, B. Gibberellins producing endophytic Aspergillus nidulans DSE-2 biosorbs Cd and down-regulates OsNRAMP5 and OsCd1 genes to improve rice growth in contaminated soil. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2025, 221, 109650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, G.; Liang, X.; Hu, L.; Li, Y.; He, Y.; Zhan, F. Dark septate endophyte Exophiala pisciphila promotes maize growth and alleviates cadmium toxicity. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1165131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Habib, H.M.; El-Fakharany, E.M.; Souka, U.D.; Elsebaee, F.M.; El-Ziney, M.G.; Ibrahim, W.H. Polyphenol-rich date palm fruit seed (Phoenix dactylifera L.) extract inhibits labile iron, enzyme, and cancer cell activities, and dna and protein damage. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bi, Y.; Xue, Z. Dark septate endophyte inoculation enhances antioxidant activity in Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus under heat stress. Physiol. Plant. 2023, 175, e14054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Xu, M.; Ye, Q.; Gao, H.; He, X. Improved tolerance of Artemisia ordosica to drought stress via dark septate endophyte (DSE) symbiosis. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Legeay, J.; Basiru, S.; Ziami, A.; Errafii, K.; Hijri, M. Response of Alternaria and Fusarium species to low precipitation in a drought-tolerant plant in Morocco. Microb. Ecol. 2024, 87, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gramaje, D.; Berlanas, C.; Martinez-Diz, M.; Diaz-Losada, E.; Antonielli, L.; Beier, S.; Gorfer, M.; Schmoll, M.; Compant, S. Comparative genomic analysis of dactylonectria torresensis strains from grapevine, soil and weed highlights potential mechanisms in pathogenicity and endophytic lifestyle. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Feng, X.; Chen, J.; Liu, F.; Hu, W.; Lin, F.; Zhang, C. Diversity of non-mycorrhizal endophytic fungi from five epiphytic orchids from Xishuangbanna, China. Mycosystema 2019, 38, 1876–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Feng, X.; Chen, J.; Wang, G.; Ccao, T.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, C. Diaporthe sinensis, a new fungus from Amaranthus sp. in China. Phytotaxa 2019, 425, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, F.; Deng, Y.; Wang, F.; Jeewon, R.; Zeng, Q.; Xu, X.; Liu, Y.; Yang, C. Morphological and molecular analyses reveal two new species of Microcera (Nectriaceae, Hypocreales) associated with scale insects on walnut in China. Mycokeys 2023, 98, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. White, T.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  60. Rehner, S.A.; Samuels, G.J. Molecular systematics of the Hypocreales: A teleomorph gene phylogeny and the status of their anamorphs. Can. J. Bot. 1995, 73, 816–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. O’Donnell, K.; Sarver, B.A.; Brandt, M.; Chang, D.C.; Noble-Wang, J.; Park, B.J.; Sutton, D.A.; Benjamin, L.; Lindsley, M.; Padhye, A.; et al. Phylogenetic diversity and microsphere array-based genotyping of human pathogenic Fusaria, including isolates from the multistate contact lens-associated U.S. keratitis outbreaks of 2005 and 2006. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 2235–2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Carbone, I.; Kohn, L.M. A Method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous Ascomycetes. Mycologia 1999, 91, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Crous, P.W.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Risede, J.M.; Simoneau, P.; Hyde, K.D. Calonectria species and their Cylindrocladium anamorphs: Species with clavate vesicles. Stud. Mycol. 2006, 55, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Xiang, C.Y.; Gao, F.; Jakovlić, I.; Lei, H.P.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zou, H.; Wang, G.T.; Zhang, D. Using PhyloSuite for molecular phylogeny and tree-based analyses. iMeta 2023, 2, e87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.; von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Minh, B.Q.; Nguyen, M.A.; von Haeseler, A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 1188–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; van der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Hohna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fengjun, G. Experimental Guidance for Plant Physiology; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2006; pp. 74–76. [Google Scholar]
  71. Yin, C.; Sun, A.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, K.; Wang, P.; Ye, W.; Fang, Y. The dynamics of H2A.Z on SMALL AUXIN UP RNAs regulate abscisic acid-auxin signaling crosstalk in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 4158–4168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Weiting, L. Research on Endophytic Fungal Resources in Poaceae Plants and the Biological Functions of Endophytic Fungi in the Order Sclerotiniaceae; Zhejiang University: Hangzhou, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  73. Taylor, J.W.; Jacobson, D.J.; Kroken, S.; Kasuga, T.; Geiser, D.M.; Hibbett, D.S.; Fisher, M.C. Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2000, 31, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Masoudi, K.F.; Ganjeali, A.; Asili, J.; Cheniany, M. Beneficial effects of endophytic fungi inoculation on tanshinones and phenolic compounds of Salvia abrotanoides. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2023, 26, 408–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mortimer, P.E.; Jeewon, R.; Xu, J.C.; Lumyong, S.; Wanasinghe, D.N. Morpho-Phylo taxonomy of novel Dothideomycetous fungi associated with dead woody twigs in Yunnan province, China. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 654683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Wang, G.; Zhang, G.; Lv, X.; Wang, Y.; Long, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, H. First complete mitogenome of Massarineae and its contribution to phylogenetic implications in Pleosporales. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 22431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Azuddin, N.F.; Mohd, M.H.; Rosely, N.; Mansor, A.; Zakaria, L. Molecular phylogeny of endophytic fungi from rattan (Calamus castaneus Griff.) spines and their antagonistic activities against plant pathogenic fungi. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Liu, Y.W.; Zeng, X.Y. Acrocalymma chuxiongense sp. nov., a new species of Acrocalymmaceae (Pleosporales) on leaves of Quercus. Biodivers. Data J. 2022, 10, e89635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Boonmee, S.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Calabon, M.S.; Huanraluek, N.; Chandrasiri, S.; Jones, G.; Rossi, W.; Leonardi, M.; Singh, S.K.; Rana, S.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 1387-1511: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2021, 111, 1–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sidhoum, W.; Dib, S.; Alim, Y.; Anseur, S.; Benlatreche, S.; Belaidouni, Z.M.; Chamouma, F. Growth-promoting effects of Aspergillus elegans and the dark septate endophyte (DSE) Periconia macrospinosa on cucumber. Arch. Microbiol. 2024, 206, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Berthelot, C.; Blaudez, D.; Leyval, C. Differential growth promotion of poplar and birch inoculated with three dark septate endophytes in two trace element-contaminated soils. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2017, 19, 1118–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Cutolo, E.A.; Guardini, Z.; Dall’Osto, L.; Bassi, R. A paler shade of green: Engineering cellular chlorophyll content to enhance photosynthesis in crowded environments. New Phytol. 2023, 239, 1567–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wu, W.; Chen, L.; Liang, R.; Huang, S.; Li, X.; Huang, B.; Luo, H.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.; Zhu, H. The role of light in regulating plant growth, development and sugar metabolism: A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1507628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Alappat, B.; Alappat, J. Anthocyanin pigments: Beyond aesthetics. Molecules 2020, 25, 5500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, L.; Wang, L.; Fang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Yang, S.; Su, J.; Ni, J.; Teng, Y.; Bai, S. Phosphorylated transcription factor PuHB40 mediates ROS-dependent anthocyanin biosynthesis in pear exposed to high light. Plant Cell 2024, 36, 3562–3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Dabravolski, S.A.; Isayenkov, S.V. The role of anthocyanins in plant tolerance to drought and salt stresses. Plants 2023, 12, 2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Shin, S.Y.; Lee, C.M.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, C.; Jeon, J.H.; Lee, H.J. Ethylene signals modulate the survival of Arabidopsis leaf explants. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Asim, M.; Ullah, Z.; Xu, F.; An, L.; Aluko, O.O.; Wang, Q.; Liu, H. Nitrate signaling, functions, and regulation of root system architecture: Insights from Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes 2020, 11, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. He, C.; Wang, W.; Hou, J.; Li, X. Dark septate endophytes isolated from wild licorice roots grown in the desert regions of northwest China enhance the growth of host plants under water deficit stress. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 522449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Newsham, K.K. A meta-analysis of plant responses to dark septate root endophytes. New Phytol. 2011, 190, 783–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Acrocalymma DSE (Acrocalymma sp. E00677, Acrocalymma vagum E00690, Acrocalymma chuxiongense E01299A, and Acrocalymma chuxiongense E01299B) colony morphology on PDA, MEA, and OMA.
Figure 1. Acrocalymma DSE (Acrocalymma sp. E00677, Acrocalymma vagum E00690, Acrocalymma chuxiongense E01299A, and Acrocalymma chuxiongense E01299B) colony morphology on PDA, MEA, and OMA.
Jof 11 00510 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree generated by a maximum likelihood analysis based on a concatenated dataset of ITS, LSU, SSU, rpb2, tef1, and tub2. Maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥ 75% (left) and Bayesian inference posterior probability ≥ 0.95 (right) are indicated at nodes (MLBS/BYPP). Byssothecium circinans CBS 675.92 and Massarina eburnea CBS 473.64 were chosen as the outgroup.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree generated by a maximum likelihood analysis based on a concatenated dataset of ITS, LSU, SSU, rpb2, tef1, and tub2. Maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥ 75% (left) and Bayesian inference posterior probability ≥ 0.95 (right) are indicated at nodes (MLBS/BYPP). Byssothecium circinans CBS 675.92 and Massarina eburnea CBS 473.64 were chosen as the outgroup.
Jof 11 00510 g002
Figure 3. Tomato seedlings co-cultivated with Acrocalymma DSE under controlled conditions.
Figure 3. Tomato seedlings co-cultivated with Acrocalymma DSE under controlled conditions.
Jof 11 00510 g003
Figure 4. Effects of Acrocalymma endophyte inoculation on physiological traits of Solanum lycopersicum ‘Daianna’ seedlings. (A) Root biomass; (B) shoot root biomass; (C) root/shoot ratio; (D) lateral root; (E) chlorophyll a content; (F) chlorophyll b content; (G) total chlorophyll content; (H) anthocyanin content; (I) root vitality assessed via TTC reduction assay. Tomato seedlings were inoculated with four Acrocalymma isolates (Acrocalymma sp. E00677, Acrocalymma vagum E00690, Acrocalymma chuxiongense E01299A, and Acrocalymma chuxiongense E01299B) and compared to a non-inoculated control. Data represent the mean ± standard error (n = X, specify number of replicates). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences among treatments at p < 0.05, based on one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test. These results demonstrate that specific Acrocalymma strains significantly promote tomato seedling growth by enhancing root architecture, chlorophyll accumulation, anthocyanin levels, and root vitality.
Figure 4. Effects of Acrocalymma endophyte inoculation on physiological traits of Solanum lycopersicum ‘Daianna’ seedlings. (A) Root biomass; (B) shoot root biomass; (C) root/shoot ratio; (D) lateral root; (E) chlorophyll a content; (F) chlorophyll b content; (G) total chlorophyll content; (H) anthocyanin content; (I) root vitality assessed via TTC reduction assay. Tomato seedlings were inoculated with four Acrocalymma isolates (Acrocalymma sp. E00677, Acrocalymma vagum E00690, Acrocalymma chuxiongense E01299A, and Acrocalymma chuxiongense E01299B) and compared to a non-inoculated control. Data represent the mean ± standard error (n = X, specify number of replicates). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences among treatments at p < 0.05, based on one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test. These results demonstrate that specific Acrocalymma strains significantly promote tomato seedling growth by enhancing root architecture, chlorophyll accumulation, anthocyanin levels, and root vitality.
Jof 11 00510 g004
Figure 5. Global distribution of Acrocalymma dark septate endophytes (DSEs) based on publicly available sequence records.
Figure 5. Global distribution of Acrocalymma dark septate endophytes (DSEs) based on publicly available sequence records.
Jof 11 00510 g005
Table 1. Gene regions and primer pairs used in this study.
Table 1. Gene regions and primer pairs used in this study.
Gene RegionsPrimersSequences of Primers 5′-3′References
ITSITS5GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG(White et al., 1990) [59]
ITS4TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC
LSULR0RACCCGCTGAACTTAAGC(Rehner & Samuels, 1995) [60]
LR5ATCCTGAGGGAAACTTC
SSUSSU-SR1RTACCTGGTTGATTCTGC(White et al., 1990) [59]
SSU-SR7GTTCAACTACGAGCTTTTTAA
rpb2RPB2-5F2GGGGWGAYCAGAAGAAGGC(O’Donnell et al., 2007) [61]
RPB2-7cRCCCATRGCTTGYTTRCCCAT
tef1EF1-728FCATCGAGAAGTTCGAGAAGG(Carbone & Kohn, 1999) [62]
EF2GGARGTACCAGTSATCATG(O’Donnell et al., 2007) [61]
tub2T1AACATGCGTGAGATTGTAAGT(O’Donnell et al., 2007) [61]
CYLTUB1RAGTTGTCGG GACGGAAGAG(Crous et al., 2006) [63]
Table 2. Reference strains information and GenBank accession numbers used in the phylogenetic analyses. A dash (“_”) indicates missing or unavailable accession numbers in the GenBank database.
Table 2. Reference strains information and GenBank accession numbers used in the phylogenetic analyses. A dash (“_”) indicates missing or unavailable accession numbers in the GenBank database.
TaxonStrain/Voucher NumberGenbank Accession Number
ITSLSUSSUrpb2tef1tub2
Acrocalymma ampeliMFLU19-2734MW063150MW063211MW079341___
Acrocalymma ampeliNCYU19-0008MW063151MW063212MW079342___
Acrocalymma aquaticumMFLUCC11-0208NR_121544NG_042698JX276953___
Acrocalymma aquaticumCC36MT875395MT875393__MT897894_
Acrocalymma arengaeMFLUCC15-0327AON650154ON650673ON650177ON734014_ON745966
Acrocalymma arengaeMFLUCC15-0327BON650155ON650674ON650178ON734015_
Acrocalymma bilobatumK.-L.Chen L119KX034339_____
Acrocalymma bilobatumMFLUCC20-0125MT875396MT875394__MT897895_
Acrocalymma bipolareMD1321_NG_075326____
Acrocalymma chuxiongenseIFRDCC3104ON595715ON596248____
Acrocalymma chuxiongenseE01299APV716432PV731392PV739235PV763383PV763379PV763388
Acrocalymma chuxiongenseE01299BPV716431PV731393PV739234PV763384PV763380PV763387
Acrocalymma cycadisCBS 137972NR_137884NG_057046____
Acrocalymma ficiCBS 317.76NR_137953NG_057056__KP170663KP170687
Acrocalymma ficiMFLUCC21-0103MT864351MT860429____
Acrocalymma guizhouenseCGMCC 3.20853OM838410OM838474OM838471___
Acrocalymma guizhouenseGZUIFR H22.028OM838411OM838475OM838472___
Acrocalymma guizhouenseGZUIFR H22.029OM838412OM838476OM838473___
Acrocalymma hongheenseHKAS 111907MW424763MW424777MW424792___
Acrocalymma hongheenseHKAS 111908MW424762MW424776MW424791___
Acrocalymma hongheenseHKAS 111909MW424761MW424775MW424790___
Acrocalymma magnoliaeMFLUCC18-0545OL413439OK655819OL331094___
Acrocalymma magnoliaeMFLUCC21-0204OL413440OK655820OL331095___
Acrocalymma medicaginisCPC 24340KP170620KP170713____
Acrocalymma medicaginisMFLUCC17-1423MT214338MT214432MT214387___
Acrocalymma medicaginisMFLUCC17-1439MT214339MT214433MT214388___
Acrocalymma philodendriCPC 46534PQ498969PQ499018 PQ497740PQ497755_
Acrocalymma pterocarpiMFLUCC17-0926MK347732NG_066306MK347840MK434897MK360040_
Acrocalymma pterocarpiNC13-171LC517880LC517881____
Acrocalymma sp.E00677PV716433PV731390PV739232PV763382PV763377PV763386
Acrocalymma vagumE00690PV716434PV731391PV739236PV763381PV763378PV763385
Acrocalymma vagumCPC24225KP170635_____
Acrocalymma vagumCPC24226KP170636_____
Acrocalymma walkeriUTHSC Dl16-195LT796832LN907338_LT796992LT797072LT796912
Acrocalymma yuxienseHKAS 111910_MW424778MW424793___
Ascocylindrica marinaMD6011_KT252905KT252907___
Ascocylindrica marinaMF416_MK007123MK007124___
Boeremia exiguaCBS 431.74FJ427001EU754183EU754084GU371780GU349080FJ427112
Boeremia foveataCBS 341.67GU237834GU237947GU238203MN983393_GU237509
Didymella exiguaCBS 183.55NR_135936NG_069119NG_061065EU874850GCA_010094145.1GCA_010094145.1
Byssothecium circinansCBS 675.92OM337536GU205217_GCA_010015675.1GU349061GCA_010015675.1
Massarina eburneaCBS 473.64OM337528GU301840_GU371732GU349040GCA_010093635.1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Feng, X.; Jin, Y.; Zhong, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Wu, H. Growth-Promoting Effects of Dark Septate Endophytes Fungus Acrocalymma on Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). J. Fungi 2025, 11, 510. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11070510

AMA Style

Feng X, Jin Y, Zhong Z, Zheng Y, Wu H. Growth-Promoting Effects of Dark Septate Endophytes Fungus Acrocalymma on Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Journal of Fungi. 2025; 11(7):510. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11070510

Chicago/Turabian Style

Feng, Xiaoxiao, Ying Jin, Zhupeiqi Zhong, Yongli Zheng, and Huiming Wu. 2025. "Growth-Promoting Effects of Dark Septate Endophytes Fungus Acrocalymma on Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)" Journal of Fungi 11, no. 7: 510. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11070510

APA Style

Feng, X., Jin, Y., Zhong, Z., Zheng, Y., & Wu, H. (2025). Growth-Promoting Effects of Dark Septate Endophytes Fungus Acrocalymma on Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Journal of Fungi, 11(7), 510. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11070510

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop