Next Article in Journal
Isolation and Identification of Endophytic Bacterium B5 from Mentha haplocalyx Briq. and Its Biocontrol Mechanisms Against Alternaria alternata-Induced Tobacco Brown Spot
Previous Article in Journal
Pilot Study Comparing the In Vitro Response of Circulating Monocytes to Aspergillus fumigatus Swollen Conidia in Patients with Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Healthy Volunteers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Genetic Confirmation of Clonal Spread of Candida auris from Southern to Northern Nevada

1
Department of Medicine, University of Nevada Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV 89250, USA
2
Nevada State Public Health Laboratory, Reno, NV 89503, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Fungi 2025, 11(6), 445; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11060445
Submission received: 20 May 2025 / Revised: 6 June 2025 / Accepted: 9 June 2025 / Published: 12 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Fungal Pathogenesis and Disease Control)

Abstract

:
Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen characterized by high levels of antifungal drug resistance and hospital outbreaks in a global distribution. Since introduction to the United States, it has been identified most frequently in New York, Illinois, California, Florida, and Nevada. Its surge poses significant risk as a nosocomial infection with multi-drug resistance, with clades bearing resistance to fluconazole, micafungin, and amphotericin B. Within the state of Nevada, and specifically the greater Las Vegas area in the southern part of the state, there are ongoing outbreaks from clade I and clade III, with 1728 confirmed clinical cases identified as of January 2025. In northern Nevada, three clinical cases have been identified to date, with two occurring at our facility. Both patients had been hospitalized at facilities in Las Vegas, Nevada. The C. auris strains isolated from these two cases have been identified as belonging to clade III and demonstrate resistance to fluconazole. Genome sequencing of the C. auris isolates indicates close genetic identity to strains from the Las Vegas outbreak. These data indicate that the spread of these clonal isolates is due to hospitalization and subsequent patient relocation to northern Nevada, revealing the ongoing importance of screening for geographic spread.

1. Introduction

Candida auris is a drug-resistant opportunistic yeast which was first isolated in 2009 in Japan and has since rapidly spread globally [1]. A rapid acceleration of hospital-acquired C. auris cases in the United States was identified during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, likely as a result of increased hospitalizations nationwide [2]. There are six identified clades, with variation in antifungal resistance within each clade [3,4,5]. In 2016, several clades were initially identified via matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI) [6]. Since then, identification of C. auris clades has favored both geographic and genomic sequencing approaches, as high levels of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) are noted between clades. Specifically, different clades will show SNP differences in the tens of thousands, while SNP differences within clades are typically less than one hundred. The distribution of these clades are as follows: clade I (south Asia), clade II (east Asia), clade III (Africa), clade IV (South America), clade V (Iran), and clade VI (Indomalayan) [3,4,5].
Concerningly, there is a high mortality rate associated with C. auris after fungemia and dissemination occurs, and treatment may be complicated by inherent resistance to fluconazole, multi-drug resistance, or extensive drug resistance [7]. Additionally, with the ability to form biofilms, and resistance to several common antiseptics used in healthcare facilities [8], nosocomial infection poses a significant risk to vulnerable patients. Both residents of long-term care facilities, such as skilled nursing facilities (SNF) and patients who are hospitalized for long periods of time, have been identified as having a higher risk of C. auris infection [9,10].
Amongst the clades, antifungal resistance varies and depends strongly on how closely related the clades are to each other. While there are no established MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) breakpoints for C. auris yet, the Centers for Disease Control has published tentative breakpoints based on extrapolation from other Candida species and expert opinion. Clades I and III show the highest resistance rates (94–96% resistant to fluconazole) [11]. Clade IV shows resistance to azole and echinocandin antifungals. However, clades II, V, and VI demonstrate lower resistance rates to all antifungals, including fluconazole [11].
Within the state of Nevada, cases have primarily been reported in southern Nevada, with Las Vegas having an ongoing outbreak which began in August of 2021 [12]. As of 13 January 2025, with unpublished Nevada State Public Laboratory data available upon public record request, there have been a total of 5118 clinical isolates noted in the state of Nevada, comprising 3390 cases of colonization and 1728 clinical cases. Ongoing epidemiological investigation has shown this to be a dual clades I and III outbreak [12]. From this outbreak, three distinct lineages have been detected from clade I, and one distinct lineage from clade III [13]. Additionally, C. auris has been isolated from sources including urine, blood, wound, axillary and groin cultures during the course of this ongoing outbreak [12]. All clinical isolates in Nevada are stored in the Nevada BioProject (PRJNA846332). However, in northern Nevada, only three clinical cases have been reported since 2018.
Herein, we report the clinical features of two cases of C. auris infections in northern Nevada, with both having recent hospitalization in southern Nevada, and the results of genome sequencing of the clinical isolates to determine the originating source of infection.

2. Materials and Methods

The following methods were used by the Nevada State Public Health Laboratory to identify the lineage of C. auris samples.

2.1. C. auris Collection

Clinical C. auris isolates were received from submitting institutions on Sabouraund Dextrose agar slants (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA USA). These samples were streaked for single colonies on HardyCHROM™ Candida agar plates (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA, USA) and incubated a temperature of 36 C for 2–5 days. Single colonies were sub-cultured on HardyCHROM™ Candida agar plates at 36 C for 2–5 days before DNA extraction.

2.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

C. auris antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using microbroth dilution and predefined gradient of antibiotic concentrations (Etest) methods. A patient isolate was grown on a SabDex agar plate (S2 Media, Spokane Valley, WA, USA), incubated at 30 °C in ambient air for 24 h, and used to make 0.5 McFarland inoculum (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA, USA) suspension in demineralized sterile water. The 0.5 McFarland suspension was measured by spectrophotometer to verify the 0.5 McFarland (80–82% transmittance). Twenty microliters of the 0.5 McFarland suspension were added into 11 mL of RPMI broth tube (S2 Media, Spokane Valley, WA, USA) and 100 μL of the RPMI diluted sample was distributed into each well of a 96-well plate pre-loaded with antibiotics. Plates were then incubated along with control plates for 24 h at 35 °C. The same 0.5 McFarland inoculum suspension was used to inoculate an RPMI agar plate using a sterile cotton swab. A single Amphotericin B Etest strip (bioMérieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France) was applied to the middle of the agar surface using sterile forceps and incubated along with control plates for 24 h at 35 °C. The AST of the microbroth dilution panel was read using a parabolic magnifying mirror to determine the MIC (lowest concentration where there is ≤50% growth compared to the growth control well). For the Amphotericin B Etest, MIC was interpreted at a value where there is 100% growth inhibition (number above where the ellipse intercepts Etest strip).

2.3. Whole Genome Sequencing of C. auris

Genomic DNA used for sequencing was extracted using a combination of bead-beating (FastPrep-24, MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA, USA) and magnetic-bead purification (Maxwell RSC 48, Promega, Madison, WI, USA). First, isolates from Sabouraud Dextrose were added to agar plates and mixed with silica beads (Lysing Matrix C, MP Biomedical). Cells were mechanically sheared with 2 cycles at 6.0 m/s for 30 s, with a 5-minute pause between (FastPrep-24, MP Biomedical). Genomic DNA was isolated using the PureFood Pathogen Kit (Promega) on a Maxwell RSC 48 (Promega), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Genomic DNA was library prepped using the DNA Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s recommended protocol to use a STARlet automated liquid handler (Hamilton Company, Reno, NV, USA). Paired-end sequencing (2 × 151) was performed using Illumina’s MiniSeq and NovaSeq 6000 to a minimum depth of 35× average coverage.

2.4. TheiaEuk Implementation

The TheiaEuk_Illumina_PE_PHB (v3.0.1) workflow performed the assembly, quality assessment, and genomic characterization of fungal genomes (described in Ambrosio et al., 2023) [14]. This cloud-native workflow was implemented in the Workflow Description Language and was operationalized on the Terra.bio platform (https://terra.bio/, accessed on 2 January 2025). Input reads were preprocessed with a raw-read quality assessment followed by read cleaning (quality trimming and adapter removal), and then an additional quality assessment of the cleaned reads. Subsequently, de novo assembly was performed using the Shovill package (1.1.0) with SKESA set as the default assembler. Once the assembly had been generated, an assembly quality assessment was performed using QUAST (5.0.2). Using the assembly, species taxon identification was performed by GAMBIT (1.0.0) [15]. For some taxa identified, taxa-specific sub-workflows were automatically activated, launching additional taxa-specific characterization tools, including a GAMBIT-based clade-typing tool (v0.5.1) and antifungal resistance detection performed using Snippy (v4.6.0) variant calling with a custom query for genes known to carry antifungal-resistance conferring mutations.

2.5. C. auris Specific Subroutines Within TheiaEuk

Upon the taxonomic assignment of C. auris to a sample, TheiaEuk_Illumina_PE_PHB automatically triggered two taxa-specific sub-workflows [14]. First, a clade-typing workflow was launched. Clade-typing was performed using a modified version of the GAMBIT module to determine which of the five clade-specific references most closely matched the query sequence. The output of the clade-typing module included the clade assignment as well as a clade-specific annotated genome, which was then passed to the antifungal resistance detection module. Second, Snippywas used to align reads to the annotated reference genome and call variants in FKS1, ERG11 and FUR1. The variants were annotated with the genes in which they were found because the input reference genome was annotated. The variants were then queried for any that occur within genes known to contain resistance conferring mutations. This method was used rather than reporting only known resistance conferring mutations to ensure that novel resistance conferring mutations were not ignored.

2.6. Shared SNP Analysis

Shared SNP analysis was performed as described in [13]. Briefly, this analysis used the vcf file from kSNP3 (v.3.3.1) which displayed whether each SNP was present, absent, or unassembled for each input genomes. This analysis focused only on SNPs that were assembled in each input genome and then filtered out from that group, SNPs that were in every input genome (save the reference genome—GenBank Accession GCA_002775015.1), and SNPs that were unique to only one of the input genomes. The SNPs that remain were referred to as “shared SNPs”, falling somewhere between unique and present in all genomes in the query set. These SNPs were manually clustered to form groups that had unique patterns of shared SNPs.

3. Cases

3.1. Case 1

A 61-year-old male resident of a skilled nursing facility (SNF) presented in August 2023 for surgical debridement of a stage IV sacral decubitus ulcer extending to bone. The patient’s past medical history included traumatic brain injury, seizures, quadriplegia, dysphagia with gastrostomy tube placement, colostomy and colectomy, recurrent polymicrobial infections of the sacral decubitus ulcer, history of pulmonary embolism, chronic atrial fibrillation, urinary retention necessitating indwelling urinary catheterization, and a recent hospitalization in Las Vegas for anemia in June of 2023. During this admission, the patient was started on vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam for empiric treatment of suspected chronic sacral osteomyelitis. Cultures obtained prior to surgical debridement grew methicillin-resistant staphylococcal aureus (MRSA) and Proteus mirabilis. The debridement was uncomplicated, and the patient was subsequently discharged on oral linezolid with a wound vacuum device, alongside plans for close follow up and wound care management. The wound cultures revealed multiple organisms which included light C. auris growth, but was most significant for Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, MRSA, and P. mirabilis. C. auris was identified as originating from clade III, with antifungal susceptibility testing indicating resistance to fluconazole, with a MIC of >256 mcg/mL. The MIC to voriconazole was 2 mcg/mL, itraconazole was 1 mcg/mL, posaconazole and isavuconazole were 0.5 mcg/mL, respectively, although interpretative breakpoints are not currently established. The MICs to amphotericin B and anidulafungin were noted to be at 1 mcg/mL, and the MICs to caspofungin and micafungin were 0.5 mcg/mL, respectively, suggesting in vitro susceptibility to these agents.
The patient was admitted to this facility in September 2023 for sepsis with encephalopathy. The patient was found to have Proteus mirabilis bacteremia and was subsequently treated with a short antibacterial course including meropenem, tobramycin, and vancomycin, which were later changed to linezolid and cefiderocol. Additionally, the patient was treated with micafungin because of the known history of C. auris. One month after discharge, a routine outpatient sacral wound culture grew numerous enteric organisms with no growth of C. auris. Subsequent outpatient sacral wound culture grew light growth of ESBL Klebsiella, MRSA, and C. auris. C. auris. MIC data from this culture yielded no increases in resistance with the MIC to fluconazole, noted at >256 mcg/mL, 2 mcg/mL for voriconazole, 0.5 mcg/mL for amphotericin B, 0.25 mcg/mL for anidulafungin, itraconazole, and micafungin, and 0.12 mcg/mL for isavuconazole and posaconazole. During a later hospitalization in April 2024, light growth of Proteus, as well as Actinobacter were reported on a left hip wound culture. In a subsequent hospital stay in May 2024, a wound culture obtained from the patient’s sacrum grew normal skin flora with no C. auris isolated.
The patient was hospitalized in September 2024 and passed away due to septic shock secondary to Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

3.2. Case 2

In June 2022, a 23-year-old male presented to our hospital for a right hip abscess and presacral abscess as well as longstanding sacral osteomyelitis. The patient’s past medical history was significant for the development of a multiloculated abscess in the presacral, right gluteal, and epidural regions, with blood cultures that grew group F streptococcus. Since then, the patient has had chronic lumbar osteomyelitis at the L5 region, recurrent right hip abscess, and presacral abscess with fistula. The patient also had a recent prior hospitalization for an intra-abdominal abscess and appendicitis with perforation. Additionally, the patient had a history of traveling from Reno to Las Vegas as a planned transfer to a hospital in Las Vegas. After returning to our facility for continued management of these abscesses and sacral osteomyelitis, the right hip wound was cultured and demonstrated light C. auris growth. After this, the patient was subsequently treated with intravenous micafungin during the duration of his clinical course. The C. auris isolate was sequenced and noted to also originate from clade III. Antifungal susceptibility testing revealed resistance to fluconazole with a MIC of >256 mcg/mL. MICs to voriconazole were 4 mcg/mL, 1 mcg/mL for anidulafungin, 0.5 mcg/mL for caspofungin, itraconazole, micafungin, and 0.25 mcg/mL for amphotericin B, posaconazole, and isavuconazole.
The patient was treated with posaconazole in the outpatient setting for continued therapy of C. auris infection for a duration of 3 months. No further wound cultures or sensitivities were drawn, and subsequent blood cultures were negative for growth.
In 2024, the patient had multiple admissions to the hospital for intra-abdominal abscesses secondary to perforated appendicitis and later cholecystitis. These were resolved in June 2024 with drainages performed by interventional radiology, and a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Wound cultures were not obtained, and blood cultures did not show growth of any organism. The patient was discharged home with close planned follow-up, but the patient was subsequently lost to further follow-up.

3.3. Genome Sequencing

Genome sequencing performed by the Nevada State Public Health Laboratory revealed that both C. auris isolates belonged to clade III with phenotypic resistance to fluconazole. No genetic mutations of concern for antifungal resistance in FKS1, ERG11 or FUR1 were identified in either case. Utilizing a shared core single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis, a comparison of 83 closely related isolates to the isolates from Patient 1 ranged from being genetically identical to a maximum difference of 8 shared SNPs. Further comparison of 190 closely related isolates to the clinical sample from Patient 2 ranged from genetically identical to a maximum of 5 shared SNPs difference.

4. Discussion

C. auris remains a significant and growing concern due to high levels of clade-specific antifungal drug resistance including occasional reports of pan-drug resistance. Here, we present two cases of C. auris isolated from patients with chronic wounds who had recent travel and hospitalization in a healthcare facility in Las Vegas.
In both cases, only light growth of C. auris was demonstrated. Taken together with the rest of the cultures and the clinical scenario, the C. auris infections were consistent with mixed polymicrobial infections involving other common healthcare-associated bacterial pathogens. Both cases were treated with micafungin, with Patient 1 never clearing the infection, as demonstrated by recurrent light growth, and Patient 2 not being re-cultured. Patient 2 was subsequently treated with an extended course of posaconazole in the outpatient setting for further therapy. Both patients were otherwise treated conventionally for their abscesses, and did not develop more invasive or disseminated C. auris infection. In both cases, it appeared that C. auris had a minor role in the overall course of infection, since neither patient developed fungemia nor severe local invasion from C. auris.
Data from the Nevada Department of Health and Human Services indicates that within the state of Nevada (as of 13 January 2025), most cases of C. auris colonization or clinical infection were noted to be in southern Nevada, particularly Las Vegas. Across the hospitals in northern Nevada, there have been only three confirmed clinical cases and seven additional cases of C. auris colonization in the same time period. With the known burden of C. auris in healthcare facilities in Las Vegas, the patients’ recent travel to Las Vegas, and the confirmed stay of Patient 2 at an acute care hospital with a C. auris outbreak, it is highly likely the patients in this report acquired C. auris in southern Nevada. This hypothesis was confirmed using genotyping and clade analysis performed by the Nevada State Public Health Lab, demonstrating direct clonal acquisition and spread from one region of the state to the northern part of the state, a distance of approximately 450 miles. Finally, with the nosocomial nature of C. auris, and the confirmed hospital stays for both patients in Las Vegas, it is highly likely that the source of the acquisition was at the Las Vegas healthcare facility.

5. Conclusions

In the two cases of C. auris in our facility, both were found to belong to clade III and demonstrated resistance to fluconazole. Both cases had recent travel to Las Vegas, and most likely acquired C. auris at a healthcare facility there, which was subsequently confirmed through genome sequencing. Facilities at the center of the fungal outbreak and facilities accepting transfers from high-burden areas should be aware of the consequences of fungal spread and ensure appropriate testing for patients upon transfer. A high degree of suspicion and screening of patients should be continued for C. auris during the next stages of the geographic spread of C. auris. If C. auris is identified, isolation precautions should be implemented due to the ease of spread of this nosocomial, opportunistic fungus.

Strengths and Limitations

Strengths include the ability to see a high proportion of the clinical cases in northern Nevada and the ability to genetically identify the isolates as identical to the clades present in the greater Las Vegas area. Weaknesses include the paucity of total cases and limited follow up for the living patient.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof11060445/s1, Supplement S1: Sample SRR Numbers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.J.R., J.L., K.B. and S.A.L.; methodology, P.J.R., J.L., K.B. and S.A.L.; formal analysis, A.V. and D.H.; investigation, P.J.R. and J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, P.J.R. and J.L.; writing—review and editing, P.J.R., J.L., A.V., D.H., K.B. and S.A.L.; supervision, K.B. and S.A.L.; funding acquisition, S.A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The IRB at the University of Nevada, Reno determined this work to be classified as Not Human Subjects Research. Confirmed 4/7/2025 #2313023-1.

Informed Consent Statement

The authors made an effort to reach out to the living patient (Case 2) to discuss the utility of their information for this publication. Unfortunately, the patient’s phone was disconnected, and the patient’s address was out of date. Consultation with the IRB was made and permission to move forward with de-identified data was granted.

Data Availability Statement

Genetic data may be made available from the Nevada State Public Health Laboratory upon request to maintain patient privacy. SSR numbers for sequencing data are available in Supplement S1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
SNFSkilled Nursing Facility
MRSAMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
SNPSingle Nucleotide Polymorphism
MICMinimum Inhibitory Concentration

References

  1. Satoh, K.; Makimura, K.; Hasumi, Y.; Nishiyama, Y.; Uchida, K.; Yamaguchi, H. Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol. Immunol. 2009, 53, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vaseghi, N.; Sharifisooraki, J.; Morovati, H.; Meis, J.F.; Ahangarkani, F.; Khodadadi, H.; Badali, H.; Nami, S.; Safari, F. Global prevalence and subgroup analyses of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) associated Candida auris infections (CACa): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mycoses 2022, 65, 683–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chow, N.A.; Gade, L.; Tsay, S.V.; Forsberg, K.; Greenko, J.A.; Southwick, K.L.; Barrett, P.M.; Kerins, J.L.; Lockhart, S.R.; Chiller, T.M.; et al. Multiple introductions and subsequent transmission of multidrug-resistant Candida auris in the USA: A molecular epidemiological survey. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 1377–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Spruijtenburg, B.; Badali, H.; Abastabar, M.; Mirhendi, H.; Khodavaisy, S.; Sharifisooraki, J.; Taghizadeh Armaki, M.; de Groot, T.; Meis, J.F. Confirmation of fifth Candida auris clade by whole genome sequencing. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2022, 11, 2405–2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Suphavilai, C.; Ko, K.K.K.; Lim, K.M.; Tan, M.G.; Boonsimma, P.; Chu, J.J.K.; Goh, S.S.; Rajandran, P.; Lee, L.C.; Tan, K.Y.; et al. Detection and characterisation of a sixth Candida auris clade in Singapore: A genomic and phenotypic study. Lancet Microbe 2024, 5, 100878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Girard, V.; Mailler, S.; Chetry, M.; Vidal, C.; Durand, G.; van Belkum, A.; Colombo, A.L.; Hagen, F.; Meis, J.F.; Chowdhary, A. Identification and typing of the emerging pathogen Candida auris by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time of flight mass spectrometry. Mycoses 2016, 59, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jacobs, S.E.; Jacobs, J.L.; Dennis, E.K.; Taimur, S.; Rana, M.; Patel, D.; Gitman, M.; Patel, G.; Schaefer, S.; Iyer, K.; et al. Candida auris Pan-Drug-Resistant to Four Classes of Antifungal Agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2022, 66, e00053-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ku, T.S.N.; Walraven, C.J.; Lee, S.A. Candida auris: Disinfectants and Implications for Infection Control. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lionakis, M.S.; Chowdhary, A. Candida auris Infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2024, 391, 1924–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yune, P.S.; Coe, J.; Rao, M.; Lin, M.Y. Candida auris in skilled nursing facilities. Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2023, 10, 20499361231189958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. da Silva, K.J.G.; Lucini, F.; Dos Santos, R.A.C.; Santos, D.A.; Meis, J.F.; Melhem, M.D.S.C.; de Aguiar Peres, N.T.; Bastos, R.W.; Rossato, L. How does antifungal resistance vary in Candida (Candidozyma) auris and its clades? Quantitative and qualitative analyses and their clinical implications. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Massic, L.; Gorzalski, A.; Siao, D.D.; Dykema, P.; Hua, C.; Schneider, E.; Van Hooser, S.; Pandori, M.; Hess, D. Detection of five instances of dual-clade infections of Candida auris with opposite mating types in southern Nevada, USA. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2023, 23, e328–e329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gorzalski, A.; Ambrosio, F.J., III.; Massic, L.; Scribner, M.R.; Siao, D.D.; Hua, C.; Dykema, P.; Schneider, E.; Njoku, C.; Libuit, K.; et al. The use of whole-genome sequencing and development of bioinformatics to monitor overlapping outbreaks of Candida auris in southern Nevada. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1198189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ambrosio, F.J., III.; Scribner, M.R.; Wright, S.M.; Otieno, J.R.; Doughty, E.L.; Gorzalski, A.; Siao, D.D.; Killian, S.; Hua, C.; Schneider, E.; et al. TheiaEuk: A species-agnostic bioinformatics workflow for fungal genomic characterization. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1198213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lumpe, J.; Gumbleton, L.; Gorzalski, A.; Libuit, K.; Varghese, V.; Lloyd, T.; Tadros, F.; Arsimendi, T.; Wagner, E.; Stephens, C.; et al. GAMBIT (Genomic Approximation Method for Bacterial Identification and Tracking): A methodology to rapidly leverage whole genome sequencing of bacterial isolates for clinical identification. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0277575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Resong, P.J.; Lee, J.; Vazquez, A.; Hess, D.; Bronander, K.; Lee, S.A. Genetic Confirmation of Clonal Spread of Candida auris from Southern to Northern Nevada. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11060445

AMA Style

Resong PJ, Lee J, Vazquez A, Hess D, Bronander K, Lee SA. Genetic Confirmation of Clonal Spread of Candida auris from Southern to Northern Nevada. Journal of Fungi. 2025; 11(6):445. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11060445

Chicago/Turabian Style

Resong, Paul J., Joseph Lee, Adam Vazquez, David Hess, Kirk Bronander, and Samuel A. Lee. 2025. "Genetic Confirmation of Clonal Spread of Candida auris from Southern to Northern Nevada" Journal of Fungi 11, no. 6: 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11060445

APA Style

Resong, P. J., Lee, J., Vazquez, A., Hess, D., Bronander, K., & Lee, S. A. (2025). Genetic Confirmation of Clonal Spread of Candida auris from Southern to Northern Nevada. Journal of Fungi, 11(6), 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11060445

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop