Next Article in Journal
A Novel Plate Compartment–Confrontation Method Discovered That Volatile Organic Compounds Produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Inhibit Botrytis cinerea and Fusarium graminearum
Next Article in Special Issue
Monitoring of Fungal Diversity and Microclimate in Nine Different Museum Depots
Previous Article in Journal
Trichoderma harzianum in Biocontrol of Maize Fungal Diseases and Relevant Mycotoxins: From the Laboratory to the Field
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fungal Pathogens of Peach Palm Leaf Spot in Thailand and Their Fungicide Sensitivity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Unveiling Species Diversity Within Early-Diverging Fungi from China VII: Seven New Species of Cunninghamella (Mucoromycota)

1
College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China
2
Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2025, 11(6), 417; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11060417
Submission received: 13 April 2025 / Revised: 23 May 2025 / Accepted: 26 May 2025 / Published: 29 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diversity of Microscopic Fungi)

Abstract

The fungal genus Cunninghamella, ubiquitously distributed as saprotrophic organisms with occasional endophytic and phytopathogenic manifestations, holds significant biomedical and biochemical importance. During systematic investigations of fungal biodiversity in China, seven novel taxa (C. amphispora sp. nov., C. cinerea sp. nov., C. flava sp. nov., C. hainanensis sp. nov., C. rhizoidea sp. nov., C. simplex sp. nov., and C. yunnanensis sp. nov.) were delineated through integrated taxonomic approaches incorporating morphological characterization, multilocus phylogenetic analyses (ITS-LSU-TEF1α), and physiological assessments. Phylogenetic reconstructions positioned these novel species within a well-supported clade along with C. bainieri and C. verticillata. New species and their diagnostic features are C. amphispora, exhibiting dimorphic sporangiola production; C. cinerea, distinguished by gray pigmentation in the colony; C. flava, characterized by a yellow colony; C. hainanensis and C. yunnanensis, bearing eponymous designations reflecting their geographic origins; and C. simplex, displaying simplified sporangiophore branching. Comprehensive taxonomic descriptions accompanied by photomicrographic illustrations are provided herein. This study constitutes the seventh installment in an ongoing series elucidating early-diverging fungal diversity in China, expanding the global Cunninghamella taxonomic inventory to 63 species and advancing our understanding of mucoralean phylogeny.

1. Introduction

The genus Cunninghamella belongs to Mucoromycota, Mucoromycetes, Mucorales, and Cunninghamellaceae [1]. It was established in 1930 by Matruchot and typified with C. echinulata (Thaxt.) Thaxt. ex Blakeslee [2,3]. Members of Cunninghamella are usually saprotrophs and sometimes endophytes, and they are ubiquitous globally in various environments, including soil, air, feces, and humus [4,5,6,7]. Meantime, some species of Cunninghamella are opportunistic pathogens causing infections in immunocompromised populations [6,8,9,10]. Additionally, Cunninghamella represents a pivotal contribution to the field of biomedicine and biochemistry, producing a rich array of metabolites such as fatty acids, terpenes, nickel-iron carriers, and sugars [11,12,13].
Cunninghamella species are characterized by the branching pattern of sporangiophores; the shape and size of terminal and lateral vesicles; and the shape, size, and surface of sporangiola [2,4,14,15,16,17,18]. In a monographic study of 2001, Zheng and Chen [2] delimited Cunninghamella species on the basis of morphological characteristics and maximum growth temperatures. Nevertheless, identification of certain Cunninghamella remains challenging due to considerable phenotypic variabilities [2]. Later, Yu et al. [10], Liu et al. [19], and Walther et al. [3] reached a consensus among morphological observations and molecular phylogenies of ITS rDNA (internal transcribed spacer of ribosomal DNA) and TEF1α (translation elongation factor 1 alpha), overcoming the limitations of traditional classification methods, thus providing a more accurate and comprehensive classification.
Currently, 56 Cunninghamella species are recorded in the Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org/, accessed on 19 December 2024), and they are distributed in Antarctica, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, China, France, India, Japan, Korea, Papua New Guinea, Spain, Switzerland, Tanzania, Thailand, and the United States [2,7,10,14,16,17,20,21,22,23,24,25].
Seven novel species of Cunninghamella were discovered based on molecular, morphological, and physiological characteristics during the process of isolating fungi from soil samples collected from southern China. Phylogenetic trees, descriptions, and illustrations of these novel species are provided herein. This is the seventh report of a serial study on diversity of Chinese early-diverging fungi [26,27,28].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Strain Isolation

In 2024, soil samples were collected in Yunnan province, China. Soil sample collection was initiated by removal of surface contaminants (including leaf litter, debris, and particulates) using a sterilized stainless steel shovel. Following surface preparation, intact soil spanning the 5–10 cm subsurface horizon was extracted. Approximately 500 g of homogenized soil material was then transferred into sterile sample bags. All collected samples were immediately labeled with waterproof markers indicating collection date, GPS coordinates (±3 m accuracy), and altitude, followed by temporary storage at 4 °C prior to laboratory processing [29,30]. Pure strains were isolated by a combination of the plate dilution coating method and the single spore separation method [31,32]. About 1 g of soil sample was added into a centrifugal tube containing 10 mL of sterile water. Then, a 10−1 soil suspension was obtained by shaking. One milliliter of the 10−1 soil suspension was transferred into a centrifuge tube containing 9 mL of sterile water to prepare a 10−2 soil suspension. In the same way, 10−3 and 10−4 soil suspensions were successfully obtained. A portion (200 µL) of 10−3 and 10−4 soil suspensions was poured on the surface of Rose Bengal. Chloramphenicol agar (RBC: peptone 5.00 g/L, glucose 10.00 g/L, MgSO4·7H2O 0.50 g/L, KH2PO4 1.00 g/L Rose Bengal 0.05 g/L, chloramphenicol 0.10 g/L, agar 15.00 g/L) [33] containing 0.03% streptomycin sulfate, coated evenly with a glass coating rod, and then incubated in darkness at 25 °C for 3–5 days. When the colony grew, it was transferred onto potato dextrose agar (PDA: 200 g potato, 20 g dextrose, 20 g agar, 1000 mL distilled water, pH 7.0) for further cultivation. After sporangium formation, sporangiospores were dispersed by suspension with sterile water. The single spores were picked up by a sterile inoculation ring and transferred to a PDA plate. The plate was placed in an incubator at 25 °C for dark cultivation. All strains were stored at 4 °C in 10% glycerol. The holotype materials were deposited in the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center, Beijing, China (CGMCC), and Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China (XG). The holotype specimens were deposited in the Herbarium Mycologicum Academiae Sinicae, Beijing, China (Fungarium, HMAS). Taxonomic information of these new strains was uploaded to the Fungal Names repository (https://nmdc.cn/fungalnames/, accessed on 25 May 2025).

2.2. Morphology and Maximum Growth Temperature

After dark culture on a PDA plate for 3–5 days, the phenotypic characteristics of fungi (obverse and reverse) were photographed using a high-definition color digital camera (DP80, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Micromorphological features of fungi were observed by a stereomicroscope (Olympus SZX10, OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan) and an optical microscope (BX53, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). For the determination of the maximum growth temperature, all strains were initially cultured in the dark at 26 °C for 3 days, and then the temperature was gradually increased by 1 °C every day until reaching a maximum temperature of 38 °C on the 12th day [34,35,36].

2.3. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from mycelia by BeaverBeads Plant DNA Kit (Cat. No.: 70409–20; BEAVER Biomedical Engineering Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) [37,38]. Molecular markers ITS rDNA (internal transcribed spacer of ribosomal RNA gene), LSU rDNA (large subunit of ribosomal RNA gene), and TEF1α (translation elongation factor 1 alpha gene) were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), respectively, using the following primer pairs: ITS5 (5′-GGA AGT AAA AGT CGT AAC AAG G-3′)/ITS4 (5′-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-3′) [39], LR0R (5′-GTA CCC GCT GAA CTT AAG C-3′)/LR5 (5′-TCC TGA GGG AAA CTT CG-3′) [40], and EF1-983F (5′- ATG ACA CCR ACR GCR ACR GTY TG-3′)/EF1-2218R (5′-AACTTGCAGGCAATGTGG-3′) [41]. The amplification procedure consisted of a predenaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing (ITS at 55 °C for 30 s, LSU at 52 °C for 30 s, and TEF1α at 56 °C for 1 min), and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and an extra extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplification reaction was performed in a volume of 25 µL, comprising 12 µL 2 × Hieff Canace® Plus PCR Master Mix (Yeasen Biotechnology, Shanghai, China, Cat No. 10154ES03), 10 µL ddH2O, 1 µL forward and reverse primers (10 µM) (TsingKe, Qingdao, China), and 1 µL fungal genomic DNA (about 1 µM). All PCR products were electrophoresed on 1% agarose gels to confirm specificity and stained with GelRed [42]. Gel recovery was performed using a Gel Extraction Kit (Cat# AE0101-C; Shandong Sparkiade Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Jinan, China). PCR products were sent to the Biosune Company Limited (Shanghai, China) for Sanger sequencing. Sequences were generated from both strands, aligned using MAFFT v.7.0, and assembled using MEGA v.7.0 [43,44,45]. ITS, LSU, and TEF1α sequences were submitted to GenBank for BLAST similarity searches (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 15 February 2025). All sequences newly acquired in this article were deposited at GenBank under the accession number in Table S1.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analyses

Phylogenetic analyses were performed based on the combined sequences of ITS, LSU, and TEF1α. Sequences both generated herein and retrieved from NCBI were presented in Table S1. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods. ML analysis was performed using RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE v.8.2.12 on the CIPRES Science Gateway website (https://www.phylo.org/, accessed on 15 February 2025) with 1000 bootstrap replicates under the GTRGAMMA model [46,47,48,49]. For BI analysis, a quick start configured with an automatic stop option was executed on a Linux system server [50,51,52]. Random initial trees were used to run six simultaneously running Markov chains for 5,000,000 generations, with samples being taken every 1000 generations. The first 25% of trees were discarded as burn-in, and the remaining trees were employed to measure the posterior probability (PP). The layout and adjustments of the phylogenetic tree were conducted on the iTOL website (https://itol.embl.de, accessed on 15 February 2025), and then the final beautification was performed through Adobe Illustrator CC 2019 (https://adobe.com/products/illustrator/, accessed on 15 February 2025).

3. Results

3.1. Phylogeny

The molecular dataset included 56 strains in Cunninghamella, with Mucor janssenii CBS 205.68 as an outgroup. The dataset consisted of 3989 characters, covering ITS rDNA (1–1692), LSU rDNA (1693–2912), and TEF1α (2913–3989). There were 2098 constant, 522 variable but parsimony-uninformative, and 1369 parsimony-informative characters. MrModelTest indicated that Dirichlet fundamental frequency along with the GTR + I + G evolution pattern was suitable for both partitions in Bayesian inference. The topology of the maximum likelihood (ML) evolutionary tree was highly congruent with that of the Bayesian inference (BI) evolutionary tree. Therefore, the ML evolutionary tree was selected as a representative for detailed illustration (Figure 1). Fourteen strains of Cunninghamella isolated in this study were grouped into seven independent clades. The new species C. simplex was closely related to C. bainieri with full support (MLBV = 100 and BIPP = 1.00) and then next to another new species, C. cinerea (MLBV = 100 and BIPP = 0.98). The new species C. flava had a close relationship with C. verticillata. (MLBV = 80 and BIPP = 0.95). The other four species each formed their own branches, that is C. amphispora (MLBV = 100, BIPP = 1), C. hainanensis (MLBV = 100 and BIPP = 1), C. rhizoidea (MLBV = 100 and BIPP = 0.99), and C. yunnanensis (MLBV = 100 and BIPP = 1).

3.2. Taxonomy

The descriptions and illustrations of seven novel Cunninghamella species are presented as follows:

3.2.1. Cunninghamella amphispora Z.Y. Ding & X.Y. Liu, sp. nov., Figure 2

Fungal Names—FN 572727.
Figure 2. Morphologies of Cunninghamella amphispora ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28652. (a,b) Colonies on PDA, (a) obverse, (b) reverse; (ce) sporangiophores with branching vesicles; (f,g) vesicles bearing sporangiola; and (h) echinulate sporangiola. Scale bars: (ch) 10 μm.
Figure 2. Morphologies of Cunninghamella amphispora ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28652. (a,b) Colonies on PDA, (a) obverse, (b) reverse; (ce) sporangiophores with branching vesicles; (f,g) vesicles bearing sporangiola; and (h) echinulate sporangiola. Scale bars: (ch) 10 μm.
Jof 11 00417 g002
Type—China, Yunnan Province, Puer City, Simao District, Yixiang Town, Dakai River section (22°60′26″ N, 101°09′54″ E, 1582.73 m), from soil, 5 July 2024, M.F. Tao and X.Y. Ji, holotype HMAS 353444, ex-holotype living culture CGMCC 3.28652 (=XG09634-9-1).
Etymology—The epithet amphispora (Lat.) refers to the species producing two types of sporangiola.
Description—Colonies on PDA at 26 °C for 4 days, reaching 85 mm in diameter, fast growing with a growth rate of 21.25 mm/d, initially white, gradually becoming light gray, floccose. Hyphae are branched, hyaline, smooth-walled, and aseptate when juvenile and septate when old. Rhizoids not found. Stolons are present. Sporangiophores arising from stolons or aerial hyphae, erect or few slightly bent, unbranched or simply branched, hyaline, single, never verticillate, always expanding upwards. They are 2.3–19.1 µm wide. Septa, if present, are single, usually just below the vesicles. Vesicles subglobose, globose, ovoid, or pillar-shaped, hyaline, smooth-walled, terminally 12.9–56.6 µm long and 11.6–46.7 µm wide, laterally 8–18.9 µm long and 5.1–14.8 µm wide. Pedicels over the entire surface of vesicles, 1.4–3.4 µm long. Sporangiola on pedicels, monosporous, globose, hyaline when young, dusky brown when old, thick-walled, 6.3–16.7 µm long, and 6.3–15.8 µm wide. Spines 0.5–2.6 µm long. Chlamydospores absent. Zygospores not found.
Maximum growth temperature—29 °C.
Additional strains examined—China, Yunnan Province, Puer City, Simao District, Yixiang Town, Dakai River section (22°60′26″ N, 101°09′54″ E, altitude 1582.73 m), from a soil sample, 5 July 2024, M.F. Tao and X.Y. Ji, living culture XG09634-9-2.
GenBank accession numbers—CGMCC 3.28652 (ITS, PV089203; LSU, PV123104; and TEF1α, PV200769), XG09634-9-2 (ITS, PV089204; LSU, PV123105; and TEF1α, PV200770).
Notes—In the phylogenetic tree of ITS-LSU-TEF1α, two strains of the Cunninghamella amphispora sp. nov. formed a fully supported independent clade (MLBV = 100, BIPP = 1.00; Figure 1), closely related to C. cinerea (BIPP = 0.97; Figure 1). These two species were distinguished by sporangiola, vesicles, pedicles, and rhizoids. The new species was distinguished from C. cinerea in producing one type of sporangiola (globose vs. globose and ovoid). The lateral vesicles were smaller than those of C. cinerea (18.9 µm × 14.8 µm vs. 20.3 µm × 17.3 µm). The pedicles of the new species were longer than those of C. cinerea (1.4–3.4 µm vs. 1.2–2.2 μm). Moreover, the new species produced abundant rhizoids, while C. cinerea was devoid of rhizoids. From a physiological perspective, the maximum growth temperature of the new species was lower than that of C. cinerea (29 °C vs. 33 °C).

3.2.2. Cunninghamella cinerea Z.Y. Ding & X.Y. Liu, sp. nov., Figure 3

Fungal Names—FN 572721.
Figure 3. Morphologies of Cunninghamella cinerea ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28650. (a,b) Colonies on PDA: (a) obverse and (b) reverse; (c,d) sporangiophores with branching vesicles; (e,f) vesicles bearing sporangiola; (g) rhizoids; and (h) echinulate sporangiola. Scale bars: (cf,h) 10 μm; (g) 20 μm.
Figure 3. Morphologies of Cunninghamella cinerea ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28650. (a,b) Colonies on PDA: (a) obverse and (b) reverse; (c,d) sporangiophores with branching vesicles; (e,f) vesicles bearing sporangiola; (g) rhizoids; and (h) echinulate sporangiola. Scale bars: (cf,h) 10 μm; (g) 20 μm.
Jof 11 00417 g003
Type—China, Yunnan Province, Puer City, Mojiang Hani Autonomous County, Tongguan Town (23°29′93″ N, 101°39′17″ E, 1471.21 m), from soil, 4 July 2024, M.F. Tao and X.Y. Ji, holotype HMAS 353442, ex-holotype living culture CGMCC 3.28650 (=XG09556-9-1).
Etymology—The epithet cinerea (Lat.) refers to gray colonies on PDA.
Description—Colonies on PDA at 26 °C for 4 days, reaching 85 mm in diameter, fast growing with a growth rate of 21.25 mm/d, initially white, gradually turning to smoky gray with age, and floccose. Hyphae are branched, hyaline, smooth-walled, and aseptate when juvenile and septate when mature. Rhizoids abundant, root-like, hyaline, and often branched. Stolons are present. Sporangiophores often arise from aerial hyphae, sometimes arising from stolons, erect or slightly bent, mainly unbranched or simply branched, hyaline, mainly single or recumbent, never verticillate, usually expanding upwards, 3.1–11.7 µm wide. Septa are rarely present, usually one or two below the vesicles in the main sporangiophores. Vesicles globose to elliptic, usually hyaline, smooth, terminally 14.3–32.3 µm long and 12.4–28.3 µm wide, and laterally 11.9–20.3 µm long and 9.9–17.3 µm wide. Pedicels covering the entire surface of vesicles, 1.2–2.2 µm long. Sporangiola on pedicles on vesicles, monosporous, globose to ovoid, hyaline when young, gradually dark brown when mature, thick-walled, 5.9–16.7 µm long, and 5.9–15.5 µm wide. Spines 0.8–1.7 µm long. Chlamydospores absent. Zygospores not found.
Maximum growth temperature—33 °C.
Additional strains examined—China, Yunnan Province, Puer City, Mojiang Hani Autonomous County, Tongguan Town (23°29′93″ N, 101°39′17″ E, altitude 1471.21 m), from soil, 4 July 2024, M.F. Tao and X.Y. Ji, living culture XG09556-9-2.
GenBank accession numbers—CGMCC 3.28650 (ITS, PV089197; LSU, PV123098; and TEF1α, PV172612), XG09556-9-2 (ITS, PV089198; LSU, PV123099; and TEF1α, PV172613).
Notes—Based on the ITS-LSU-TEF1α phylogenetic tree, two strains of the Cunninghamella cinerea sp. nov. formed a well-supported clade (MLBV = 100 and BIPP = 1.00; Figure 1), exhibiting a close relationship to C. simplex and C. bainieri (MLBV = 100 and BIPP = 0.98; Figure 1). Morphologically, the new species was distinguished from C. simplex by lateral vesicles (11.9–20.3 × 9.9–17.3 μm vs. 6.7–17 × 3.8–10.8 μm), shorter pedicles (1.2–2.2 μm vs. 1.1–2.9), and root-like rhizoids. The new species differed from C. bainieri by nonverticillate sporangiophores and shorter pedicles (1.2–2.2 μm vs. 2.5–3.5 (–6)). Besides, the new species had two shapes of sporangiola (globose and ovoid), but C. bainieri had four shapes (ovoid, ellipsoid, globose, and lacrymoid). Although both the new species and C. bainieri had rhizoids, the former was root-like and the latter was finger-like. Physiologically, the maximum growth temperature of the new species was 1 °C lower than that of C. bainieri (33 °C vs. 34 °C) [2].

3.2.3. Cunninghamella flava Z.Y. Ding & X.Y. Liu, sp. nov., Figure 4

Fungal Names—FN 572722.
Figure 4. Morphologies of Cunninghamella flava ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28651. (a,b) Colonies on PDA, (a) obverse, (b) reverse; (c) sporangiophores; (d,e) sporangiophores with branching vesicles; (fh) vesicles bearing sporangiola; and (i) echinulate sporangiola. Scale bars: (ci) 10 μm.
Figure 4. Morphologies of Cunninghamella flava ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28651. (a,b) Colonies on PDA, (a) obverse, (b) reverse; (c) sporangiophores; (d,e) sporangiophores with branching vesicles; (fh) vesicles bearing sporangiola; and (i) echinulate sporangiola. Scale bars: (ci) 10 μm.
Jof 11 00417 g004
Type—China, Yunnan Province, Puer City, Mojiang Hani Autonomous County, Tongguan Town (23°29′93″ N, 101°39′17″ E, 1471.21 m), from soil, 4 July 2024, M.F. Tao and X.Y. Ji, holotype HMAS 353443, ex-holotype living culture CGMCC 3.28651 (=XG9559-10-1).
Etymology—The epithet flava (Lat.) refers to the yellow colonies on PDA.
Description—Colonies on PDA at 26 °C for 6 days, reaching 72 mm in diameter, fast growing with a growth rate of 12 mm/d, initially white, gradually turning to dry yellow with age, floccose. Hyphae are branched, hyaline, smooth-walled, and aseptate when juvenile and septate when mature. Rhizoids are absent. Stolons are present. Sporangiophores arising from aerial hyphae or stolons, erect or slightly bent, unbranched or 1–7 branched, hyaline, single, recumbent, opposite, in pairs, 1–3 verticillate, sometimes growing irregularly, swelling or bulging, then tapering upward, 3.8–25.6 µm wide. Septa, if present, are usually one or two below the vesicles in the main sporangiophores. Vesicles globose, pear-shaped, or elliptic, usually hyaline and smooth, terminally 16.6–43.1 µm long and 15.4–44.5 µm wide, and laterally 9.3–28.1 µm long and 9.4–25.3 µm wide. Pedicels on the entire surface of the vesicle, 1.6–2.2 µm long. Sporangiola on pedicles, monosporous, globose to ovoid, hyaline when young, gradually tawny when mature, thick-walled, 8.9–18.6 µm long, 8.8–18.7 µm wide. Spines are 1.4–2.8 µm long. Chlamydospores are absent. Zygospores are not found.
Maximum growth temperature—33 °C.
Additional strains examined—China, Yunnan Province, Puer City, Mojiang Hani Autonomous County, Tongguan Town (23°29′93″ N, 101°39′17″ E, altitude 1471.21 m), from soil, 4 July 2024, M.F. Tao and X.Y. Ji, living culture XG09559-10-2.
GenBank accession numbers—CGMCC 3.28651 (ITS, PV089199; LSU, PV123100; and TEF1α, PV200765), XG09559-10-2 (ITS, PV089200; LSU, PV123101; and TEF1α, PV200766).
Notes—Based on the ITS-LSU-TEF1α phylogenetic tree, two strains of the Cunninghamella flava sp. nov. formed a fully supported lineage (MLBV = 100, BIPP = 1.00; Figure 1), closely related to C. verticillata (MLBV = 80 and BIPP = 0.95; Figure 1). However, they were different in terms of morphological features such as vesicles, pedicles, rhizoids, zygosporangia, and zygospores. The vesicles of the new species were characterized by various shapes, including globose, pear-shaped, and elliptic, while vesicles were quite regular in C. verticillata, mainly depressed-globose, subglobose to globose. The pedicles of the new species were shorter than those of C. verticillata (1.6–2.2 µm vs. 2.5–4 (–6.5) µm). Rhizoids were absent in the new species, whereas they were present in C. verticillata. Moreover, typical zygosporangia and zygospores were generated in C. verticillata, while absent in the new species. Physiologically, the maximum growth temperature of the new species was significantly lower than those of C. verticillata (33 °C vs. (37–) 39–42 °C) [2].

3.2.4. Cunninghamella hainanensis Z.Y. Ding & X.Y. Liu, sp. nov., Figure 5

Fungal Names—FN 572723.
Figure 5. Morphologies of Cunninghamella hainanensis ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28649. (a,b) Colonies on PDA, (a) obverse, (b) reverse; (ce) sporangiophores with branching vesicles; (fh) vesicles bearing sporangiola; and (i) echinulate sporangiola. Scale bars: (ci) 10 μm.
Figure 5. Morphologies of Cunninghamella hainanensis ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28649. (a,b) Colonies on PDA, (a) obverse, (b) reverse; (ce) sporangiophores with branching vesicles; (fh) vesicles bearing sporangiola; and (i) echinulate sporangiola. Scale bars: (ci) 10 μm.
Jof 11 00417 g005
Type—China, Hainan Province, Danzhou City, near Hainan Tropical Botanical Garden (19°51′19″ N, 109°50′08″ E, 108 m), from a soil sample, 14 February 2024, M.F. Tao and X.Y. Ji, holotype HMAS 353441, ex-holotype living culture CGMCC 3.28649 (=XG06926-15-1).
Etymology—The epithet hainanensis (Lat.) refers to the location of the ex-holotype, Hainan Province, China.
Description—Colonies on PDA at 26 °C for 4 days, reaching 85 mm in diameter, fast growing with a growth rate of 21.25 mm/d, initially white, gradually becoming light gray, floccose. Hyphae are branched, hyaline, smooth-walled, and aseptate when juvenile and septate with age. Rhizoids are absent. Stolons are present. Sporangiophores arising from stolons or aerial hyphae, mostly erect, a few slightly bent, occasionally verticillate, hyaline, single, unbranched or 1–3 branched, opposite, in pairs, and 2.9–10.6 µm wide. Septa, if present, is usually one. Vesicles are subglobose, globose, or elliptic, smooth-walled, terminally 15.1–27.8 µm long and 11.7–26.8 µm wide, and laterally 16.8–28.4 µm long and 11.2–22.9 µm wide. Pedicels on the entire surface of vesicles, 1.2–5.8 µm long. Sporangiola are borne on pedicles, monosporous, mostly globose, hyaline when young, dusky brown when old, thick-walled, 7.3–14 µm long, and 7.8–13.4 µm wide. Spines are 0.7–1.9 µm long. Chlamydospores are absent. Zygospores are not found.
Maximum growth temperature—29 °C.
Additional strains examined—China, Hainan Province, Danzhou City, near Hainan Tropical Botanical Garden (19°51′19″ N, 109°50′08″ E, altitude 108 m), from a soil sample, 14 February 2024, M.F. Tao and X.Y. Ji, living culture XG06926-15-2.
GenBank accession numbers—CGMCC 3.28649 (ITS, PV089195; LSU, PV123096; and TEF1α, PV172610), XG06926-15-2 (ITS, PV089196; LSU, PV123097; and TEF1α, PV172611).
Notes—Based on the ITS-LSU-TEF1α sequence, two strains of the Cunninghamella hainanensis sp. nov. formed a distinct clade with full support (MLBV = 100 and BIPP = 1.00; Figure 1), showing a close relatedness to C. rhizoidea (BIPP = 0.99; Figure 1). Morphological comparisons revealed notable differences between these two new species in spine length and rhizoids. The spines of C. hainanensis were shorter than those of C. rhizoidea (0.7–1.9 µm × 1.3–2.0 µm). Furthermore, C. hainanensis possessed numerous rhizoids, while the feature was absent in C. rhizoidea. Physiologically, C. hainanensis demonstrated a significantly lower maximum growth temperature than that of C. rhizoidea (29 °C vs. 33 °C).

3.2.5. Cunninghamella rhizoidea Z.Y. Ding & X.Y. Liu, sp. nov., Figure 6

Fungal Names—FN 572724.
Figure 6. Morphologies of Cunninghamella rhizoidea ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28654. (a,b) Colonies on PDA, (a) obverse, (b) reverse; (c,d) sporangiophores with branching vesicles; (e,f) vesicles bearing sporangiola; (g) rhizoids; and (h) echinulate sporangiola. Scale bars: (cf,h) 10 μm; (g) 20 μm.
Figure 6. Morphologies of Cunninghamella rhizoidea ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28654. (a,b) Colonies on PDA, (a) obverse, (b) reverse; (c,d) sporangiophores with branching vesicles; (e,f) vesicles bearing sporangiola; (g) rhizoids; and (h) echinulate sporangiola. Scale bars: (cf,h) 10 μm; (g) 20 μm.
Jof 11 00417 g006
Type—China, Yunnan Province, Lincang City, Gengma Dai Autonomous County, He Pai Township (23°48′32″ N, 99°41′66″ E, 988.59 m), from soil, 7 July 2024, M.F. Tao and X.Y. Ji, holotype HMAS 353446, ex-holotype living culture CGMCC 3.28654 (=XG09702-9-1).
Etymology—The epithet rhizoidea (Lat.) refers to the species producing abundant rhizoids.
Description—Colonies on PDA at 26 °C for 4 days, reaching 85 mm in diameter, fast growing with a growth rate of 21.25 mm/d, initially white, gradually becoming gray with age and floccose. Hyphae are branched, hyaline, smooth-walled, and aseptate when adolescent and septate when mature. Rhizoids are obviously present, root-like, complexly branching, and abundant. Stolons are present. Sporangiophores are formed from aerial hyphae or stolons, erect or slightly bent, mainly simple branches or occasionally multiple branches, hyaline, single, recumbent, opposite, occasionally verticillate, sometimes having a swollen area below the sporangiophores, and 2.8–11.4 µm wide. Septa, if observed, are usually only one in sporangiophores. Vesicles are globose, club-shaped, hyaline, smooth, terminally 9.3–35.3 µm long and 9.2–32.0 µm wide, and laterally 2.7–26.6 µm long and 2.4–27.1 µm wide. Pedicels are formed on the surface of the vesicle, 1.5–5.4 µm long. Sporangiola are formed on pedicles on vesicles, monosporous, globose to ovoid, hyaline when young, gradually tea brown when mature, thick-walled, 8.2–13.4 µm long, 7.9–12.9 µm wide, with short spines. Spines are 1.3–2.0 µm long. Chlamydospores are absent. Zygospores are not found.
Maximum growth temperature—33 °C.
Additional strains examined—China, Yunnan Province, Puer City, Mojiang Hani Autonomous County, Tongguan Town (23°29′93″ N, 101°39′17″ E, altitude 1471.21 m), from soil, 4 July 2024, M.F. Tao and X.Y. Ji, living culture XG09702-9-2.
GenBank accession numbers—CGMCC 3.28654 (ITS, PV089205; LSU, PV123106; and TEF1α, PV222157), XG09702-9-2 (ITS, PV089206; LSU, PV123107; and TEF1α, PV222158).
Notes—Based on the analysis of the ITS-LSU-TEF1α sequence, two strains of the Cunninghamella rhizoidea sp. nov. formed a fully supported independent lineage (MLBV = 100 and BIPP = 0.99; Figure 1), exhibiting close genetic relatedness to C. hainanensis (BIPP = 0.99; Figure 1). Morphological comparisons further highlighted significant differences between the two species in terms of sporangiola, spine length, and rhizoids (see the note to C. hainanensis above).

3.2.6. Cunninghamella simplex Z.Y. Ding & X.Y. Liu, sp. nov., Figure 7

Fungal Names—FN 572725.
Figure 7. Morphologies of Cunninghamella simplex ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28653. (a,b) Colonies on PDA, (a) obverse, (b) reverse; (ce) sporangiophores with branching vesicles; (f,g) vesicles bearing sporangiola; and (h) echinulate sporangiola. Scale bars: (ch) 10 μm.
Figure 7. Morphologies of Cunninghamella simplex ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28653. (a,b) Colonies on PDA, (a) obverse, (b) reverse; (ce) sporangiophores with branching vesicles; (f,g) vesicles bearing sporangiola; and (h) echinulate sporangiola. Scale bars: (ch) 10 μm.
Jof 11 00417 g007
Type—China, Yunnan Province, Puer City, Simao District, Yixiang Town, Yutang Section, Longlongba Jinyu Tea Estate (22°68′48″ N, 101°07′32″ E, 1549.97 m), from soil, 5 July 2024, M.F. Tao and X.Y. Ji, holotype HMAS 353445, ex-holotype living culture CGMCC 3.28653 (=XG09611-12-1).
Etymology—The epithet simplex (Lat.) refers to the simple branching pattern of sporangiophores.
Description—Colonies on PDA at 26 °C for 4 days, reaching 85 mm in diameter, fast growing with a growth rate of 21.25 mm/d, initially white, gradually turning to dusky gray, and floccose. Hyphae are branched, hyaline, smooth-walled, and aseptate when young and septate with age. Rhizoids are absent. Stolons are present. Sporangiophores arising from stolons or aerial hyphae, erect or slightly bent, hyaline, unbranched or simply branched, in pairs, never verticillate, and 3.1–12.2 µm wide. Septa are occasionally present below vesicles in the main sporangiophores, usually only one. Vesicles are globose, ovoid, or cylindrical, usually hyaline; sometimes light brownish; smooth; terminally 9.9–28.4 µm long and 9.0–25.8 µm wide; and laterally 6.7–17.0 µm long and 3.8–10.8 µm wide. Pedicels are over the surface of vesicles and 1.1–2.9 µm long. Sporangiola borne on pedicles, monosporous, globose to ovoid, hyaline when young, light brown with age, smooth, thick-walled, 5.9–10.2 µm long, and 5.6–9.7 µm wide. Spines are very short, sparse, and 0.3–0.8 µm. Chlamydospores are absent. Zygospores are not found.
Maximum growth temperature—33 °C.
Additional strains examined—China, Yinnna Province, Puer City, Simao District, Yixiang Town, Yutang Section, Longlongba Jinyu Tea Estate (22°68′48″ N, 101°07′32″ E, altitude 1549.97 m), from soil, 5 July 2024, M.F. Tao and X.Y. Ji, living culture XG09611-12-2.
GenBank accession numbers—CGMCC 3.28653 (ITS, PV089201; LSU, PV123102; and TEF1α, PV200767), XG09611-12-2 (ITS, PV089202; LSU, PV123103; and TEF1α, PV200768).
Notes—According to the ITS-LSU-TEF1α sequence, two strains of the Cunninghamella simplex sp. nov. constituted a distinct branch with full support (MLBV = 100 and BIPP = 1.00; Figure 1), closely related to C. bainieri (MLBV = 100 and BIPP = 1.00; Figure 1). These two species were obviously different in the morphology of sporangiophores, sporangiola, vesicles, pedicles, and rhizoids. The new species lacked pseudoverticillate and verticillate sporangiophores, while C. bainieri produced them. Additionally, the new species differed from C. binariae by the simply shaped sporangiola, globose to ovoid, in contrast to the ovoid to ellipsoid, globose, and lacrymoid of various sporangiola in C. bainieri. The difference between the new species and C. bainieri on vesicles was that the new species generates globose, ovoid, and cylindrical forms, whereas C. bainieri produced globose, subglobose, and ovoid shapes. The pedicles of the new species were shorter than those of C. bainieri (1.1–2.9 µm vs. 2.5–3.5 (–6) µm). The new species lacked rhizoids, while C. bainieri gave rise to finger-like rhizoids. Physiologically, the maximum growth temperature of the new species was one degree lower than that of C. bainieri (33 °C vs. 34 °C) [2].

3.2.7. Cunninghamella yunnanensis Z.Y. Ding & X.Y. Liu, sp. nov., Figure 8

Fungal Names—FN 572726.
Figure 8. Morphologies of Cunninghamella yunnanensis ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28655. (a,b) Colonies on PDA, (a) obverse, (b) reverse; (c,d) sporangiophores with branching vesicles; (e,f) vesicles bearing sporangiola; (g) rhizoids; and (h) echinulate sporangiola. Scale bars: (ch) 10 μm.
Figure 8. Morphologies of Cunninghamella yunnanensis ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28655. (a,b) Colonies on PDA, (a) obverse, (b) reverse; (c,d) sporangiophores with branching vesicles; (e,f) vesicles bearing sporangiola; (g) rhizoids; and (h) echinulate sporangiola. Scale bars: (ch) 10 μm.
Jof 11 00417 g008
Type—China, Yunnan Province, Baoshan City, Longyang District, Lujiang Dam (24°92′66″ N, 98°88′15″ E, 703.72 m), from soil, 10 July 2024, M.F. Tao and X.Y. Ji, holotype HMAS 353447, ex-holotype living culture CGMCC 3.28655 (=XG10042-9-1).
Etymology—The epithet yunnanensis (Lat.) refers to the location, Yunnan Province, China, where the ex-holotype was collected.
Description—Colonies on PDA at 26 °C for 4 days, reaching 85 mm in diameter, fast growing with a growth rate of 21.25 mm/d, initially white, gradually becoming light gray with age, and floccose. Hyphae are branched, hyaline, smooth-walled, exuberant, and aseptate when juvenile and septate when old. Rhizoids are present, root-like, hyaline, and rarely branched. Stolons are present. Sporangiophores produce from stolons or aerial hyphae, erect or slightly bent, mainly unbranched or occasionally 1–7 branched, hyaline, straight or recumbent, few verticillate, usually expanding upwards, and 1.8–14.6 µm wide. Septa are sometimes one or two below the vesicles in the main sporangiophores. Vesicles are subglobose, globose, ovoid, elliptic, hyaline, smooth, terminally 10.5–33.8 µm long and 9.6–33.5 µm wide, and laterally 5.5–13.9 µm long and 4–12.4 µm wide. Pedicels are present throughout the vesicles and 1.1–4.1 µm long. Sporangiola are borne on pedicles, monosporous, mainly globose, sometimes ovoid, hyaline when young, grown when mature, thick-walled, 5.2–12.4 µm long, and 4.1–12.0 µm wide, with short spines. Spines are 0.7–2.0 µm long. Chlamydospores are absent. Zygospores are not found.
Maximum growth temperature—33 °C.
Additional strains examined—China, Yunnan Province, Baoshan City, Longyang District, Lujiang Dam (24°92′66″ N, 98°88′15″ E, altitude 703.72 m), from soil, 10 July 2024, M.F. Tao and X.Y. Ji, living culture XG10042-9-2.
GenBank accession numbers—CGMCC 3.28655 (ITS, PV089207; LSU, PV123108; and TEF1α, PV222159), XG10042-9-2 (ITS, PV089208; LSU, PV123109; and TEF1α, PV222160).
Notes—Based on the ITS-LSU-TEF1α phylogenetic tree, two strains of the Cunninghamella yunnanensis sp. nov. formed a fully supported independent lineage (MLBV = 100 and BIPP = 1.00; Figure 1), closely related to C. hainanensis (MLBV = 90 and BIPP = 0.98; Figure 1). They differed significantly in sporangiola, vesicles, pedicle length, and rhizoids. The sporangiola of the new species were smaller than those of C. hainanensis (5.2–12.4 × 4.1–12.0 µm vs. 7.3–14 × 7.8–13.4 µm). The maximum terminal vesicles of the new species were larger (33.8 × 33.5 µm vs. 27 × 26.5 µm), and the lateral vesicles were smaller than those of C. hainanensis (13.9 × 12.4 µm vs. 28.4 × 22.9 µm). The new species was shorter than C. hainanensis in pedicles (1.1–4.1 vs. 1.2–5.9 μm). Additionally, the new species possessed rhizoids, while C. hainanensis was absent. Physiologically, the maximum growth temperature of the new species was higher than that of C. hainanensis (33 °C vs. 29 °C).

4. Discussion

Currently, fungal taxonomists give paramount importance to molecular data when describing new taxa or evaluating interspecific relationships [53,54,55]. Specifically, sequences sourced from type materials are crucial for constructing a solid phylogenetic structure, serving as the foundation for a natural classification system [56]. Nonetheless, classical morphological characteristics and physiological characteristics continued to be widely acknowledged as a vital element in this process. The morphological and physiological characteristics and molecular data together provided a comprehensive picture of the species identity and evolutionary relationships [15,20]. In this study, seven novel species of Cunninghamella from southern China were identified based on morphological, physiological, and molecular data from type strains. And the morphological characteristics of these seven novel species and their relatives were systematically compared herein (Table 1).
The phylogenetic analysis of 14 strains using combined ITS-LSU-TEF1α sequences revealed 7 robust monophylies (Figure 1). Cunninghamella hainanensis and C. rhizoidea were sisters to each other. Morphologically, the former had shorter spines and more plentiful rhizoids. C. cinerea had a close relationship with C. simplex and C. bainieri. Compared with C. simplex, C. cinerea had larger lateral vesicles, shorter pedicels, rhizoids, and spineless sporangiola. C. cinerea differed from C. bainieri by nonverticillate sporangiophores, shorter pedicles, and different shapes of rhizoids and sporangiola [2]. In contrast to C. verticillata, which had almost all globular vesicles, the vesicles were more varied in C. flava, like globose, pear-shaped, and elliptic. Additionally, C. flava had shorter pedicels and no rhizoids. More importantly, C. flava lacked the classical sexual stage, which was present in C. verticillata [2]. In comparison to C. cinerea, C. amphispora had smaller lateral vesicles, longer pedicles, and spines. In comparison to C. bainieri, C. simplex had shorter pedicles, different shapes of vesicles, and sporangiola. Sporangiophores were not pseudoverticillate and verticillate in C. simplex, but they were present in C. bainieri [2].
In addition, temperature also served as a crucial factor in the categorization of fungi [14]. The maximum growth temperatures of the seven newly discovered species, C. amphispora, C. hainanensis, C. cinerea, C. flava, C. rhizoidea, C. simplex, and C. yunnanensis, were 29 °C, 29 °C, 33 °C, 33 °C, 33 °C, 33 °C, and 33 °C, respectively. Although the temperature tolerance of these new species was not very high, the maximum temperature of C. verticillata, a close relative of C. flava, was 42 °C [2]. C. amphispora and C. hainanensis were the same in maximum growth temperature but different in microscopic characteristics. In conclusion, both morphological and physiological traits were crucial for classifying fungi.
With the discovery of these seven new species, the genus Cunninghamella currently accommodates 63 species, among which 23 species were recorded in China. These species were mainly isolated from soil (19), faded flowers (2), endophytic in Salicornia bigelovii (1), and air (1) (http://www.indexfungorum.org/, accessed on 20 May 2025) [2,15,22,23,24,25]. From the perspective of the distribution of vegetation types, these species widely covered various ecological types in China, including the tropical monsoon forests and tropical rainforest areas in Hainan; the evergreen broad-leaved forests and tropical monsoon forests in the south subtropical zone of Guangdong; the evergreen broad-leaved forests in the subtropical zone of Jiangsu, Guizhou, Hubei, and Hunan; the deciduous broad-leaved forest in the warm temperate zone of Beijing; the temperate grassland and desert vegetation in Inner Mongolia; the temperate desert; and mountain vertical zone vegetation in Xinjiang. This cross-vegetation type distribution characteristic indicated that the species of the Cunninghamella genus had strong ecological adaptability and, at the same time, provided a new perspective for studying the correlation between fungal diversity and vegetation types.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof11060417/s1, Supplementary Table S1: GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in this study; Supplementary File S1: the combined ITS-LSU-TEF1α sequence matrix used in this study.

Author Contributions

Z.-Y.D. was responsible for DNA sequencing, photo editing, and paper drafting; Y.J. and W.-X.L. were responsible for data analyses; M.-F.T., Y.-X.W. and X.-Y.J. collected soil samples; S.W. was responsible for data analyses and manuscript revision; X.-Y.L. took charge of naming the new species, conceiving and revising the paper, and providing funding. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 32170012, 32470004, and 32300011), the Ji’nan City’s ‘New University 20 Policies’ Initiative for Innovative Research Teams Project (202228028), the Innovative Agricultural Application Technology Project of Jinan City (CX202210), and the Key Technological Innovation Program of Shandong Province, China (2022CXGC020710).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The sequences from the present study were submitted to the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 12 February 2025). The sequences were deposited in the GenBank database (Table S1).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Spatafora, J.W.; Chang, Y.; Benny, G.L.; Lazarus, K.; Smith, M.E.; Berbee, M.L.; Bonito, G.; Corradi, N.; Grigoriev, I.; Gryganskyi, A.; et al. A phylum-level phylogenetic classification of zygomycete fungi based on genome-scale data. Mycologia 2016, 108, 1028–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zheng, R.Y.; Chen, G.Q. A monograph of Cunninghamella. Mycotaxon 2001, 80, 1–75. [Google Scholar]
  3. Walther, G.; Pawłowska, J.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Wrzosek, M.; Rodriguez-Tudela, J.L.; Dolatabadi, S.; Chakrabarti, A.; de Hoog, G.S. DNA barcoding in Mucorales: An inventory of biodiversity. Persoonia 2013, 30, 11–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Matruchot, L. Une Mucorinée purement conidienne, Cunninghamella africana. Annales Mycologici. 1903, 1, 45–60. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baijai, U.; Mehrotra, B.S. The genus Cunninghamella—A reassessment. Sydowia 1980, 33, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  6. Reed, M.D.A.; Body, P.B.; Austin, M.D.M.B.; Frierson, M.D.H., Jr. Cunninghamella bertholletiae and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia as a fatal complication of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Hum. Pathol. 1988, 19, 1470–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nguyen, T.T.T.; Choi, Y.J.; Lee, H.B. Zygomycete fungi in Korea: Cunninghamella bertholletiae, Cunninghamella echinulata, and Cunninghamella elegans. Mycobiology 2017, 45, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gomes, M.Z.; Lewis, R.E.; Kontoyiannis, D.P. Mucormycosis caused by unusual mucormycetes, non-Rhizopus, -Mucor, and -Lichtheimia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 411–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kwon-Chung, K.J. Taxonomy of fungi causing mucormycosis and entomophthoramycosis (zygomycosis) and nomenclature of the disease: Molecular mycologic perspectives. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54 (Suppl. S1), S8–S15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, J.; Walther, G.; Van Diepeningen, A.D.; Gerrits Van Den Ende, A.H.G.; Li, R.Y.; Moussa, T.A.A.; Almaghrabi, O.A.; De Hoog, G.S. DNA barcoding of clinically relevant Cunninghamella species. Med. Mycol. 2015, 53, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fakas, S.; Papanikolaou, S.; Galiotou-Panayotou, M.; Komaitis, M.; Aggelis, G. Organic nitrogen of tomato waste hydrolysate enhances glucose uptake and lipid accumulation in Cunninghamella echinulata. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 105, 1062–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Alakhras, R.; Bellou, S.; Fotaki, G.; Stephanou, G.; Demopoulos, N.A.; Papanikolaou, S.; Aggelis, G. Fatty acid lithium salts from Cunninghamella echinulata have cytotoxic and genotoxic effects on HL-60 human leukemia cells. Eng. Life. Sci. 2015, 15, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, H.; Lv, M.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Y.; Ju, X.; Song, Z.; Ren, L.; Jia, B.; Qiao, M.; et al. High-yield oleaginous fungi and high-value microbial lipid resources from Mucoromycota. Bioenerg. Res. 2020, 14, 1196–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, C.W.; Liou, G.Y.; Chien, C.Y. New records of the genus Cunninghamella (Mucorales) in Taiwan. Fungal Sci. 2005, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  15. Guo, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, D.; Zhang, J.N.; Zhao, Y.H.; Liu, T.X.; Xin, Z.H. Isolation of Cunninghamella bigelovii sp. nov. CGMCC 8094 as a new endophytic oleaginous fungus from Salicornia bigelovii. Mycol. Prog. 2015, 14, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alves, A.L.; de Souza, C.A.; de Oliveira, R.J.; Cordeiro, T.R.; de Santiago, A.L. 2017 Cunninghamella clavata from Brazil: A new record for the western hemisphere. Mycotaxon 2017, 132, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bragulat, M.R.; Castella, G.; Isidoro-Ayza, M.; Domingo, M.; Cabanes, F.J. Characterization and phylogenetic analysis of a Cunninghamella bertholletiae isolate from a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2017, 34, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Weitzman, I.; Crist, M.Y. Studies with clinical isolates of Cunninghamella II. Physiological and morphological studies. Mycologia 1980, 72, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, X.Y.; Huang, H.; Zheng, R.Y. Relationships within Cunninghamella based on sequence analysis of ITS rDNA. Mycotaxon 2001, 80, 77–95. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hyde, K.D.; Hongsanan, S.; Jeewon, R.; Bhat, D.J.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Jones, E.B.G.; Phookamsak, R.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; Boonmee, S.; Zhao, Q.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 367–490: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2016, 80, 1–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Suwannarach, N.; Kumla, J.; Supo, C.; Honda, Y.; Nakazawa, T.; Khanongnuch, C.; Wongputtisin, P. Cunninghamella saisamornae (Cunninghamellaceae, Mucorales), a new soil fungus from northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 2021, 509, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, Z.Y.; Zhao, Y.X.; Shen, X.; Chen, W.H.; Han, Y.F.; Huang, J.Z.; Liang, Z.Q. Molecular phylogeny and morphology of Cunninghamella guizhouensis sp. nov. (Cunninghamellaceae, Mucorales), from soil in Guizhou, China. Phytotaxa 2020, 455, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Y.J.; Zhao, T.; Wu, W.Y.; Wang, M.; Liu, X.Y. Cunninghamella verrucosa sp. nov. (Mucorales, Mucoromycota) from Guangdong province in China. Phytotaxa 2022, 560, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, H.; Zhu, J.; Zong, T.K.; Liu, X.L.; Ren, L.Y.; Lin, Q.; Qiao, M.; Nie, Y.; Zhang, Z.D.; Liu, X.Y. Two new species in the family Cunninghamellaceae from China. Mycobiology 2021, 49, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhao, H.; Nie, Y.; Zong, T.; Wang, K.; Lv, M.; Cui, Y.; Tohtirjap, A.; Chen, J.; Zhao, C.; Wu, F.; et al. Species diversity, updated classification and divergence times of the phylum Mucoromycota. Fungal Divers. 2023, 123, 49–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhao, H.; Nie, Y.; Huang, B.; Liu, X.Y. Unveiling species diversity within early-diverging fungi from China I: Three new species of Backusella (Backusellaceae, Mucoromycota). MycoKeys 2024, 109, 285–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tao, M.F.; Ding, Z.Y.; Wang, Y.X.; Zhang, Z.X.; Zhao, H.; Meng, Z.; Liu, X.Y. Unveiling species diversity within early-diverging fungi from China II: Three new species of Absidia (Cunninghamellaceae, Mucoromycota) from Hainan Province. MycoKeys 2024, 110, 255–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Y.X.; Zhao, H.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, X.Y.; Tao, M.F.; Liu, X.Y. Unveiling species diversity within early-diverging fungi from China III: Six new species and a new record of Gongronella. (Cunninghamellaceae, Mucoromycota). MycoKeys 2024, 110, 287–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, W.X.; Wei, Y.H.; Zou, Y.; Liu, P.; Li, Z.; Gontcharov, A.A.; Stephenson, S.L.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, S.H.; Li, Y. Dictyostelid cellular slime molds from the Russian Far East. Protist 2020, 171, 125756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zou, Y.; Hou, J.G.; Guo, S.N.; Li, C.T.; Li, Z.; Stephenson, S.L.; Pavlov, I.N.; Liu, P.; Li, Y. Diversity of dictyostelid cellular slime molds, including two species new to science, in forest soils of Changbai Mountain, China. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0240222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, H.; Nie, Y.; Zong, T.; Dai, Y.; Liu, X.Y. Three new species of Absidia (Mucoromycota) from China based on phylogeny, morphology and physiology. Diversity 2022, 14, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, H.; Nie, Y.; Zong, T.; Wang, Y.; Wang, M.; Dai, Y.; Liu, X.Y. Species diversity and ecological habitat of Absidia (Cunninghamellaceae, Mucorales) with emphasis on five new species from forest and grassland soil in China. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Corry, J.E.L. Rose bengal chloramphenicol (RBC) agar. In Progress in Industrial Microbiology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995; pp. 431–433. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zheng, R.Y.; Chen, G.Q.; Huang, H.; Liu, X.Y. A monograph of Rhizopus. Sydowia 2007, 59, 273–372. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zheng, R.Y.; Liu, X.Y.; Li, R.Y. More Rhizomucor causing human mucormycosis from China: R. chlamydosporus sp. nov. Sydowia 2009, 61, 135–147. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zong, T.K.; Zha, H.; Liu, X.L.; Ren, L.Y.; Zhao, C.L.; Liu, X.Y. Taxonomy and phylogeny of four new species in Absidia (Cunninghamellaceae, Mucorales) from China. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 677836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 1990, 12, 13–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guo, L.D.; Hyde, K.D.; Liew, E.C.Y. Identification of endophytic fungi from Livistona chinensis based on morphology and rDNA sequences. New Phytol. 2000, 147, 617–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  40. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. O’Donnell, K.; Lutzoni, F.M.; Ward, T.J.; Benny, G.L. Evolutionary relationships among mucoralean fungi Zygomycota: Evidence for family polyphyly on a large scale. Mycologia 2001, 93, 286–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, Z.; Liu, R.; Liu, S.; Mu, T.; Zhang, X.; Xia, J. Morphological and phylogenetic analyses reveal two new species of Sporocadaceae from Hainan, China. MycoKeys 2022, 88, 171–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT Multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Katoh, K.; Rozewicki, J.; Yamada, K.D. MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Felsenstein, J. Confidence intervals on phylogenetics: An approach using bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 2688–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Minh, Q.; Nguyen, M.; Von Haeseler, A.A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 1188–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huelsenbeck, J.P.; Ronquist, F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 754–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nylander, J. MrModeltest V2: Program distributed by the author. Bioinformatics 2004, 24, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; Van der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bauer, R.; Garnica, S.; Oberwinkler, F.; Riess, K.; Weiß, M.; Begerow, D. Entorrhizomycota: A new fungal phylum reveals new perspectives on the evolution of fungi. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0128183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jeewon, R.; Hyde, K.D. Establishing species boundaries and new taxa among fungi: Recommendations to resolve taxonomic ambiguities. Mycosphere 2016, 7, 1669–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Jones, E.B.G.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Bhat, J.D.; Dayarathne, M.C.; Huang, S.K.; Norphanphoun, C.; Senanayake, I.C.; Perera, R.H.; et al. Families of Sordariomycetes. Fungal Divers. 2016, 79, 1–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hu, D.M.; Wang, M.; Cai, L. Phylogenetic assessment and taxonomic revision of Mariannaea. Mycol. Prog. 2016, 16, 271–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of Cunninghamella is based on sequences of ITS, LSU rDNA, and TEF1α, with Mucor jansseni as an outgroup. Nodes are annotated with ML bootstrap values (MLBV ≥ 70%) and BI posterior probabilities (BIPP ≥ 0.9), separated by slashes “/”. The bold black represents ex-type or ex-holotype strains with an asterisk “*”. Strains isolated in this study are displayed in red. The scale at the bottom left indicates 0.1 substitutions per site.
Figure 1. The maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of Cunninghamella is based on sequences of ITS, LSU rDNA, and TEF1α, with Mucor jansseni as an outgroup. Nodes are annotated with ML bootstrap values (MLBV ≥ 70%) and BI posterior probabilities (BIPP ≥ 0.9), separated by slashes “/”. The bold black represents ex-type or ex-holotype strains with an asterisk “*”. Strains isolated in this study are displayed in red. The scale at the bottom left indicates 0.1 substitutions per site.
Jof 11 00417 g001
Table 1. Morphological characteristics of Cunninghamella species.
Table 1. Morphological characteristics of Cunninghamella species.
SpeciesColoniesSporangiophoresVesiclesPedicelsSporangiolaReference
C. hainanensisPDA: 26 °C 4 days, 85 mm, 21.25 mm/d, initially white, gradually becoming light gray, floccose2.9–10.6 µm wide, mostly erect, a few slightly bent, occasionally verticillate, unbranched or 1–3 branched, opposite, in pairsGlobose, subglobose, elliptic, terminal vesicles 15.1–27.8 × 11.7–26.8 µm and lateral vesicles 16.8–28.4 × 11.2–22.9 µm1.2–5.8 µm longMostly globose, 7.3–14 × 7.8–13.4 µm, with short spines, 0.7–1.9 µm longThis study
C.  cinereaPDA: 26 °C 4 days, 85 mm, 21.25 mm/d, initially white, gradually turning to smoky gray with age, floccose3.1–11.7 µm wide, erect or slightly bent, mainly unbranched or simply branched, mainly single or recumbent, never verticillateGlobose to elliptic, terminal vesicles 14.3–32.3 × 12.4–28.3 µm and lateral vesicles 11.9–20.3 × 9.9–17.3 µm1.2–2.2 µm longGlobose to ovoid, 5.9–16.7 × 5.9–15.5 µm, with short spines, 0.8–1.7 µm longThis study
C. flavaPDA: 26 °C 6 days, 72 mm, 12 mm/d, initially white, gradually turning to dry yellow with age, floccose3.8–25.6 µm wide, erect or slightly bent, unbranched or 1–7 branched, recumbent, opposite, in pairs, 1–3 verticillateGlobose, pear-shaped, elliptic, terminal vesicles 16.6–43.1 × 15.4–44.5 µm and lateral vesicles 9.3–28.1 × 9.4–25.3 µm1.6–2.2 µm longGlobose to ovoid, 8.9–18.6 × 8.8–18.7 µm wide, with short spines, 1.4–2.8 µm longThis study
C.  amphisporaPDA: 26 °C 4 days, 85 mm, 21.25 mm/d, initially white, gradually becoming light gray, floccose2.3–19.1 µm wide, erect or few slightly bent, unbranched or simply branched, hyaline, single, no verticillateSubglobose, globose, ovoid, pillar-shaped, terminal vesicles 12.9–56.6 × 11.6–46.7 µm and lateral vesicles 8–18.9 × 5.1–14.8 µm1.4–3.4 µm longGlobose, 6.3–16.7 × 6.3–15.8 µm, with short spines, 0.5–2.6 µm longThis study
C. simplexPDA: 26 °C 4 days, 85 mm, 21.25 mm/d, initially white, gradually turning to dusky gray, floccose3.1–12.2 µm wide, erect or slightly bent, hyaline, unbranched or simply branched, in pairs, never verticillateSpherical, ovoid, cylindrical, terminal vesicles 9.9–28.4 × 9.0–25.8 µm and lateral vesicles 6.7–17.0 × 3.8–10.8 µm1.1–2.9 µm longGlobose to ovoid,
5.9–10.2 × 5.6–9.7 µm, with very short spines, 0.3–0.8 µm long
This study
C. rhizoideaPDA: 26 °C 4 days, 85 mm, 21.25 mm/d, initially white, gradually becoming gray with age, floccose2.8–11.4 µm wide, erect or slightly bent, simple branches or occasionally multiple branches, recumbent, opposite, occasionally verticillateGlobose, club-shaped, terminal vesicles 9.3–35.3 × 9.2–32.0 µm and lateral vesicles 2.7–26.6 × 2.4–27.1 µm1.5–5.4 µm longGlobose to ovoid, 8.2–13.4 × 7.9–12.9 µm, with short spines, 1.3–2.0 µm longThis study
C. yunnanensisPDA: 26 °C 4 days, 85 mm, 21.25 mm/d, initially white, gradually becoming light gray with age, floccose1.8–14.6 µm wide, erect or few slightly bent, mainly unbranched or occasionally 1–7 branched, straight or recumbent, few verticillateSubglobose, globose, ovoid, elliptic terminal vesicles 10.5–33.8 × 9.6–33.5 µm and lateral vesicles 5.5–13.9 × 4–12.4 µm1.1–4.1 µm longMainly globose, sometimes ovoid, 5.2–12.4 × 4.1–12.0 µm wide, with short spines, 0.7–2.0 µm longThis study
C. bainieriSMA: 27 °C 4 days, 90 mm, at first white, soon becoming light gray, gray, to ‘Light Mouse Gray’, reverse cream, floccoseErect, bent, or recumbent, main axes of sporangiophores (8–) 11–21 µm wide; primary branches (1–) 4–10 (–18) µm wide, monopodial, pseudoverticillate, or verticillate in 1–2 (–3) whorls of 3–8, typically in pairsGlobose, subglobose to ovoid, sometimes irregular, axial vesicles 18.5–32(–40) μm and lateral ones (8–)13.5–30 μm2.5–3.5 (–6) μm longOvoid to ellipsoid and 7–14.5 (–20) × 6.5–11 (–14.5) µm globose and 5.5–12.5 µm, lacrymoid and 9–20 (–32.5) × 7–14.5 (–20) µm[2]
C. verticillataSMA: 28 °C 5–6 days, 90 mm, at first white, from the sixth day near ‘Avellaneous’ to near ‘Colonial Buff’, reverse yellowish cream, floccoseErect, straight, or recumbent, main axes of sporangiophores 7.5–17.5 (–25) µm; branches (0–) 4–15 (–25), verticillate to pseudoverticillate, rarely singly or in pairs, mostly simple, very rarely re-branchedAxial ones slightly depressed—globose, subglobose to globose, 225–50 (–70) μm and lateral ones usually globose to subglobose, sometimes broadly ovoid, 8.5–27.5 (–32.5) μm2.5–4 (–6.5) um longTwo kinds: globose, broadly ellipsoid ovoid and bluntly pointed at one end, 6–17.5 (–20) × 5.5–13.5 (–17.5) µm; dark giant sporangiola, globose, 11.5–17.5 (−25) µm[2]
Notes: PDA—Potato Dextrose Agar, SMA—Synthetic Mucor Agar.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ding, Z.-Y.; Tao, M.-F.; Ji, X.-Y.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, Y.-X.; Liu, W.-X.; Wang, S.; Liu, X.-Y. Unveiling Species Diversity Within Early-Diverging Fungi from China VII: Seven New Species of Cunninghamella (Mucoromycota). J. Fungi 2025, 11, 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11060417

AMA Style

Ding Z-Y, Tao M-F, Ji X-Y, Jiang Y, Wang Y-X, Liu W-X, Wang S, Liu X-Y. Unveiling Species Diversity Within Early-Diverging Fungi from China VII: Seven New Species of Cunninghamella (Mucoromycota). Journal of Fungi. 2025; 11(6):417. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11060417

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ding, Zi-Ying, Meng-Fei Tao, Xin-Yu Ji, Yang Jiang, Yi-Xin Wang, Wen-Xiu Liu, Shi Wang, and Xiao-Yong Liu. 2025. "Unveiling Species Diversity Within Early-Diverging Fungi from China VII: Seven New Species of Cunninghamella (Mucoromycota)" Journal of Fungi 11, no. 6: 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11060417

APA Style

Ding, Z.-Y., Tao, M.-F., Ji, X.-Y., Jiang, Y., Wang, Y.-X., Liu, W.-X., Wang, S., & Liu, X.-Y. (2025). Unveiling Species Diversity Within Early-Diverging Fungi from China VII: Seven New Species of Cunninghamella (Mucoromycota). Journal of Fungi, 11(6), 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11060417

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop