Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Semen Respiratory Activity of Domesticated Species before and after Cryopreservation: Boars, Bulls, Stallions, Reindeers and Roosters
Previous Article in Journal
Multiple Meningioma Resection by Bilateral Extended Rostrotentorial Craniotomy with a 3D-Print Guide in a Cat
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Diversity of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae Serovars in Hungary

1
Institute of Metagenomics, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 94, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
2
Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hungária krt. 23–25, H-1143 Budapest, Hungary
3
Veterinary Medical Research Institute, Hungária krt. 21, H-1143 Budapest, Hungary
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2022, 9(10), 511; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9100511
Submission received: 31 July 2022 / Revised: 12 September 2022 / Accepted: 16 September 2022 / Published: 20 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Veterinary Microbiology, Parasitology and Immunology)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae causes severe pneumonia in pigs, resulting in high economic losses. A total of 114 isolates from pneumonia were characterized by the examination of biotype, serovar, antibiotic resistance genes, and genes of toxin production. Analyzing their genetic relationship, 16 groups of related isolates were found. The genetic diversity was different in the different groups, however. It was remarkably small in the case of serovar 13, which was unusually frequent in Hungary. Therefore, representative isolates of serovar 13 were subjected to whole-genome sequencing, confirming low diversity. Antibiotic resistance was frequently found in isolates of serovar 13 but was less frequent in other serovars. The unusually high frequency and low diversity of serovar 13 suggest a clonal spread in Hungary, which may have been facilitated by a high frequency of resistance to beta-lactams and tetracyclines.

Abstract

A total of 114 Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolates from porcine hemorrhagic necrotic pleuropneumonia were characterized by the examination of biotype, serovar, antibiotic resistance genes, and genes of toxin production. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used to analyze their genetic relationship, which identified 16 clusters. Serovar 2 (50 isolates), serovar 13 (25 isolates), serovar 9 (11 isolates), and serovar 16 (7 isolates) were the most frequent serovars. Serovar 2 formed nine distinguishable clusters; serovar 13 and serovar 16 were less diverse, exhibiting two potentially related subclusters; serovar 9 was represented by a single cluster. Remarkably small differences were seen in the core genome when nine representative isolates of serovar 13 were subjected to whole-genome sequencing. Tetracycline resistance was relatively frequent in the two clusters of serovar 13; one of them was also frequently resistant against beta-lactams. Resistance in other serovars was sporadic. All isolates carried the apxIV gene. The toxin profiles of serovar 2 were characterized by the production of ApxII and ApxIII toxins, except for a small cluster of three isolates: serovar 9 and serovar 16 isolates produced ApxI and ApxII toxins. Serovar 13 carried apxII and apxIBD genes, indicating the production of the ApxII toxin, but not of ApxI or ApxIII. The unusually high frequency and low diversity of serovar 13 are not explained by its virulence properties, but the high frequency of resistance to beta-lactams and tetracyclines may have played a role in its spread. The emergence of serovar 16 may be facilitated by its high virulence, also explaining its high clonality.

1. Introduction

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae is a major pathogen of swine. Two biotypes and 19 serovars (serotypes) can be differentiated within the species; however, sometimes nontypable strains can also occur. Strains of biotype I need nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD, V-factor) to culture, while biotype II strains can replicate without it [1,2,3,4,5]. A. pleuropneumoniae can infect domestic pigs but occasionally it can also colonize wild boars [6].
Different virulence variants of the agent have been described. Some strains cause high mortality, while others are intermediate in virulence or avirulent. In addition to type 4 fimbria, outer membrane proteins, capsules, surface polysaccharides, lipopolysaccharide, biofilm formation capacity, extracellular enzymes, and toxins were identified as virulence factors [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. The major virulence factors of A. pleuropneumoniae are exotoxins, which are RTX toxins (repeats in toxins). A. pleuropneumoniae strains can produce four types of exotoxins. The secretion of toxin effectors apxIA and apxIIA is mediated by the apxIBD exporter; the production of ApxIII and ApxIV toxins is independent of apxIBD [8,9]. The toxin ApxIV is characteristic of and produced by all isolates of the species [16,17]; four variants of its gene have been found [18], but it remains unknown whether the encoded toxins differ in their function. The production of the other three toxins ApxI, ApxII, and ApxIII varies among serotypes [19,20]. The formation of ApxII toxin is almost universal among serovars, except serovars 10 and 14, though serovar 3 seems to be unable to secrete it due to missing apxIBD [18]. Though this toxin is a less potent leucocidin than ApxI or ApxIII, it is capable of synergistically enhancing their effect [21]. Many A. pleuropneumoniae strains produce ApxI or ApxIII together with ApxII. ApxI toxin, which is considered to confer the highest virulence [9,22,23], is usually produced by serovars 1, 5a, 5b, 9, 10, 11, 14, and 16 [19,24], and it is a major, though not the sole contributor to lung damage and disease caused by these serovars [9,12,25]. Therefore, serovars producing ApxI are considered more virulent than those serovars that do not produce it [22,23]. Serovars carrying apxIII together with apxII are serovars 2, 4, 6, 8, and 15; they are also considered virulent, i.e., traditionally, high virulence is attributed to the presence of at least two secreted exotoxins (ApxII plus ApxI or ApxIII) besides the intrinsically produced ApxIV, while biotypes/serovars carrying only one toxin gene besides ApxIV are considered to show low virulence, thus they are unlikely to cause epizootics [3]. In addition to typical toxin-producing strains, atypical ones lacking certain genes also occur [26]. This virulence-based grouping is in line with the lipopolysaccharide O-chain or omlA phylogroups as well [3,27]; however, other virulence factors also contribute to disease severity [12]. Most conventional herds are infected with one or more serovars of A. pleuropneumoniae, but these strains usually show low virulence and their serovar pattern is different from that of isolates causing severe diseases [3].
Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae shows considerable geographic variation, and differences in the dominant serovars in different countries and regions have been reported [3]. Outbreaks and sporadic cases are frequently caused by different serovars. Serovar 2 was dominant in Germany and Hungary [28,29], it was the second most common in the Czech Republic [30,31], while serovar 8 was the most frequently isolated serovar in England and Wales [32]. Serovars 5 and 7 were the most frequent serovars in Canada [33,34]. Nevertheless, biotype 2 strains are more commonly isolated in Europe, e.g., in Hungary [29,35], Denmark [36], or Spain [37], than in America.
The aim of the study was the investigation of the genetic diversity of A. pleuropneumoniae in Hungary using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and focusing on the correlation between genotypes, serovars, toxin profiles, and the presence of antimicrobial resistance genes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

A total of 114 A. pleuropneumoniae strains isolated between 1995 and 2014 from the lungs of pigs with hemorrhagic necrotic pneumonia were included in the examinations. Samples were collected from pigs that died because of pleuropneumonia or from lung lesions in slaughterhouses. The samples originated from 44 different swine herds located in different parts of Hungary.

2.2. Bacterium Culture, Serotyping, Antibiotic Resistance, Toxin Profile

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae strains were isolated on Tryptone Soya Agar (TSA, Biolab Ltd., Budapest, Hungary) containing 10% defibrinated sheep blood and cross-inoculated with a nurse streak of Staphylococcus aureus. They were later cultured on chocolate agar completed with 50 μg/mL NAD (Biolab Ltd., Budapest, Hungary). The agar plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h in an aerobic environment with the addition of 5% carbon dioxide.
The A. pleuropneumoniae strains were identified and biotyped using standard methods [38,39] and their identity was confirmed by examination with 16S rRNA PCR, as described earlier [6]. The isolated A. pleuropneumoniae strains were stored at −80 °C until further examinations.
Serovar typing was performed using an indirect hemagglutination test, as described previously [24,29]. Unfortunately, some archive isolates lost viability before serotyping (Figure 1).
Susceptibility to amoxicillin, penicillin, oxytetracycline, doxycycline, florfenicol, cefoperazone, tiamulin, and enrofloxacin was determined by broth microdilution tests following the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [40]. Resistance genes blaROB-1, blaBRO-1/blaBRO-2, tetA, tetB, tetL, tetH, and tetK were detected by PCR assays [41,42,43,44]. Toxin profiling was performed as described [20].

2.3. Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used to assess genetic relatedness. Plug preparation was performed as described earlier [45], plugs were digested with ApaI, and macrorestriction profiles were obtained in a CHEF DRIII instrument with electrophoresis parameters following Chevallier et al. [46]. Profiles were analyzed using the software Fingerprinting II (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) using the Dice similarity coefficient and the UPGMA clustering method. The threshold for probable relatedness was set at 85%.

2.4. Whole-Genome Sequencing

Genomes of nine serotype 13 isolates were chosen for whole-genome sequencing to represent the two pulsotypes and various isolation years and herds of origin. Sequencing was performed using the Illumina NextSeq 500 platform to obtain 150 bp-long single-end reads. Read quality was checked by FastQC 0.11.9 [47] to ensure sufficient data quality, then reads were assembled using SPAdes 3.14.1 [48] with default options. The contiguity of assemblies was checked using QUAST 5.0.2 [49] and completeness was assessed using BUSCO 5.2.2 [50]. The pangenome of samples was reconstructed using Panaroo 1.2.10 [51], a pipeline that ensures the accurate identification of gene presence/absence by clustering and re-finding genes in genome sequences annotated by Prokka 1.14.6 [52]. The aligned core genes were subject to phylogenetic reconstruction using IQ-TREE 1.6.12 [53] using the automatic model selection (-m MFP) and testing the statistical robustness (aLRT and ultrafast bootstrap) using 1000 replications. The phylogenetic tree and the gene presence/absence matrix were plotted using the R 4.0.4 [54] packages ggtree [55] and ggplot2 [56]. The blocks of gene clusters unique to given lineages were filtered using the awk 4.1.4 programming language and the functional re-annotation of these genes was carried out using the eggNOG mapper [57] webserver (http://eggnog-mapper.embl.de/, accessed on 21 July 2022). The identity of phage sequences was checked using the PHASTER webserver (https://phaster.ca/, accessed on 21 July 2022). Resistance genes were screened using ABRicate (Seemann, T; https://github.com/tseemann/abricate, accessed on 21 July 2022).

3. Results

3.1. Serovars

The predominance of serovar 2 was evident in 50 isolates from at least 26 different geographically and technologically isolated herds. Further major serovars were serovar 13 (25 isolates from 8 different herds), serovar 9 (11 isolates from 5 herds), and serovar 16 (seven isolates from six herds). Other serovars were sporadic or absent (Supplementary Table S1).

3.2. Macrorestriction Clusters

A total of 16 clusters could be differentiated among the examined A. pleuropneumoniae strains, and the serovars differed markedly in their macrorestriction diversity (Supplementary Table S1). The dominant serovar 2 was highly diverse, with eight distinguishable clusters (G1 to J), featuring a major important cluster I2 including 29 isolates (more than half of all serovar 2 isolates) from at least 14 different herds. Serovar 13 biotype 2 was markedly less diverse, forming two potentially related subclusters with 14 and 11 isolates each from four herds (A1 and A2, respectively). All other major serovars (serovars 9, 10, and 16) were represented by a single cluster (clusters C, D2, and D1, respectively) showing high genetic relatedness. All major genetic clusters, except cluster D1, had a relatively long history of presence in Hungary; the first isolates of clusters A1, A2, C, D2, and I3 dated back to 1995, 1998, 2002, 2002, and 1998, respectively. All these major clusters have been shown to be present in the same herd for years (Figure 1).

3.3. Resistance Genes

Resistance against beta-lactam agents was frequently found in cluster A2; 4/11 isolates representing two herds were resistant to penicillin G (MIC = 64 mg/L in all cases) and amoxicillin (MIC = 128 mg/L in all cases), while 2/11 were also resistant to cefoperazone (MIC = 16–32 mg/L). The four penicillin and amoxicillin-resistant isolates carried the gene blaROB-1. Isolates of cluster A2 were also frequently resistant to oxytetracycline (6/11 representing two herds; MIC = 16–128 mg/L) and to doxycycline (5/11; MIC = 4–8 mg/L). All doxycycline-resistant isolates harbored the tetL gene. The single oxytetracycline-resistant but doxycycline-susceptible isolate exhibited a relatively low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 16 mg/L and harbored neither tetL nor any other tested tetracycline resistance gene. Resistance against tetracyclines was also frequent in cluster A1; 6/14 isolates were resistant against oxytetracycline and doxycycline (MIC ranges as for cluster A2). Five of these isolates (from the same herd) carried a tetL gene and tetB was present in the remaining isolate. A single sporadic isolate harbored a tetB gene (Supplementary Table S1).
Regarding biotype 1 isolates, a single isolate in cluster C (serovar 9) carried a tetH gene (oxytetracycline MIC = 16 mg/L). In cluster D (serovar 16), one isolate harbored a tetB (oxytetracycline MIC = 16 mg/L) and another a tetL gene (oxytetracycline MIC = 32 mg/L). Isolates of cluster F carried a tetB gene (oxytetracycline MIC = 16 mg/L); two isolates from different herds in cluster I1 carried tetL genes (oxytetracycline MIC = 64 mg/L). Of the isolates of the large I2 cluster, one showed decreased susceptibility to penicillin G (MIC = 4 mg/L), one a tetB (oxytetracycline MIC = 8 mg/L), and another one a tetL gene (oxytetracycline MIC = 64 mg/L) (Supplementary Table S1). Other isolates were susceptible to the drugs tested; beta-lactamase genes blaROB-1, blaBRO-1/blaBRO-2 were not detected.

3.4. Toxin Profile

All isolates carried the species-specific apxIV gene, confirming species identification, but major differences were detected in toxin gene carriage patterns between biotypes, serovars, and clusters (Supplementary Table S1). All biovar 2 isolates (serovar 13 clusters A1, A2, and serovar 14 cluster B) lacked the genes apxIII and apxIA, carrying the genes apxII and apxIB, indicating the ability for the production of ApxII toxin only. Biovar 1 serovar 2 isolates generally carried apxIB, apxII, and apxIII (clusters G-I), indicating the ability for the production and secretion of ApxII and ApxIII, but not ApxI, associated with high virulence. Biovar 1 serovar 2 isolates of cluster J carried only the genes apxII and apxIBD and were capable of producing and secreting only ApxII, similarly to biotype 2 isolates. Sporadic biotype 1 isolates (serovar 12) behaved similarly, i.e., carried only apxII and apxIBD. In contrast, clusters C (serovar 9), D1 (serovar 16), D2 (serovar 16), and E (untypeable isolates) carried the genes apxIA, apxIBD, and apxII; thus, these isolates are likely to produce and secrete the toxin ApxI, associated with high virulence, together with ApxII.

3.5. Whole-Genome Analysis

The genome sizes were 2.26–2.99 Mbps and the GC contents were 41.03–41.26% (Supplementary Table S2). Genome completeness was >98.2%. The genomes contained 2055 core and 181 shell (i.e., present in >15% and <95% of isolates) genes; variability is limited in both the core genome sequence variability (proportion of variable sites 0.004) and presence/absence of accessory genes. Based on their core genome, the nine isolates sequenced were split into two distinct groups; however, short branch lengths indicate shallow genetic differentiation within clades (Figure 2). Raw reads are available at NCBI as Bioproject PRJNA874317.
The group of isolates A149, A16, and A12 exhibits a large deletion in the region associated with type IV pilus assembly, lacking the genes tadB, tadA, tadZ, rcpB, rcpA, rcpC, tadV, flp2, flp1, and rhlB. These also harbor the broad-host range phage Salmon118970 Sal3. All nine genomes harbor the Mannheimia phage vB_MhS_587AP2. Resistance genes, apart from those already mentioned, were not found.

4. Discussion

The 16 PFGE clusters showed the high variability of A. pleuropneumoniae strains isolated in Hungary; however, whole-genome sequencing indicated well-conserved genomes that differ mainly in phage insertions, capsule polysaccharides, lipopolysaccharides, and RTX clusters that encode serotype-specific antigens [58,59].
The serovar distribution of A. pleuropneumoniae is variable in the different geographical regions. In Europe, generally, serovars 2, 4, 7, 8, and 9 are dominant [30,31,60,61,62]; however, serovar 8 was found to be the most frequent one in the UK [32]. Serovar distribution in this study of Hungarian isolates showed similarity to data from other European countries; however, serovar 1, formerly reported as frequent [63,64], disappeared, and the high proportion of serovar 13 (biotype 2), as well as serovar 16 (biotype 1), was also characteristic [29]. This seems to be a country-specific phenomenon, as in the Czech Republic, which is geographically close to Hungary, these serovars 13 and 16 were not reported [30,31]. In such cases, the differences cannot be explained convincingly by only the geographical distribution of strains. Nevertheless, the factors in the background of these differences are largely unknown. Potential explanations include (i) locally frequent serovars remain frequent because they have the highest chance to be introduced to a susceptible herd; (ii) virulence properties, i.e., highly virulent strains/serovars, are found more frequently; (iii) vaccination patterns, as bacterin vaccines offer protection against certain but never against all serovars; (iv) clonal advantages, i.e., differences in resistance, or in predisposition to the development of resistance, to antimicrobials used to treat porcine respiratory diseases or to disinfectants used in farms; (v) interaction with other infectious agent(s) that are involved in the etiology of the porcine respiratory disease complex; and (vi) technological differences, e.g., differential susceptibility of pig breeds farmed or differences in containment procedures.
Virulence properties probably contribute strongly to differences in serovar frequency. Those serovars producing the most potent ApxI together with ApxII (serovar 1, 5a, 5b, 9, and 11) are among the most frequently isolated serovars in many geographical regions. Similarly, serovars producing the cytotoxic but not hemolytic ApxIII together with ApxII (serovar 2, 4, 6, 8, and 15) are also frequently found. Thus, the relatively high frequency of serovar 9, which is a regionally important serovar [30,31], may be attributed to its high presumed virulence. It should be noted that all of the isolates tested in the present as well as in the cited Czech studies originated from pathological cases and none of them were isolated from asymptomatic carriers.
As serovar 16 has been shown to produce ApxI together with ApxII [24], its importance in Hungarian herds may be explained in the same manner; the high prevalence of serovar 16, at present, seems to be specific to the Hungarian epidemiological situation. Isolates of serovars 9 and 16 were highly clonal, the same clones were found in several geographically and technologically distinct farms, and persisted consistently over time in Hungary, lending further support to the above presumption.
Similarly, the higher frequency of serovar 2 in Hungary—as well as in other European countries [28,29,65]—than in North America [3] may also be caused by the production of one additional toxin (ApxIII) by the European strains. However, the virulence properties inferred from toxin production patterns do not fully explain the dominance of the probably less-virulent serovars 2 or 13 over serovars 9 and 16.
Serovar 2, in contrast to any other major serovar found, was highly diverse, characterized by four major clusters comprised of eight subclusters (G1-3, H, I1-4, and J). This is perfectly in line with previous findings [66], where ribotyping, as well as PFGE, showed a degree of diversity among A. pleuropneumoniae serovar 2 isolates, not only in Hungary but also in other European countries and in Canada. Similar results were obtained using amplified fragment length polymorphism in Danish isolates [67].
Cluster J was confined to a single farm and showed a toxin gene pattern similar to American serovar 2 isolates, i.e., apxIBD, apxII and a lack of apxIII, thus producing only ApxII besides the universal ApxIV. Consequently, these are probably less virulent than the other Hungarian serovar 2 isolates, which sufficiently explains their geographically and temporally limited presence and may represent an importation event without long-lasting persistence. In contrast, the three other major clusters were found in abundance throughout the country, with an overwhelming dominance of subcluster I2 present in 14 of the 44 geographically isolated farms sampled. This dominant cluster showed the same toxin gene profile as the other less-frequent subclusters within cluster I or within serovar 2. The dominance of serovar 2 in Hungary may be explained by a local/regional effect of integrated pig husbandry firms supplying pigs to multiple farms. However, this does not fully explain the diversity patterns of this serovar, especially the overwhelming dominance of subcluster I3 among serovar 2 isolates.
Serovar 13 was the second most frequent serovar in this study, which seems to be country-specific. Biotype 2 strains are more commonly isolated in Europe, e. g., in Hungary [29,35], Denmark [36], and Spain [37], than in the US [68].
These Hungarian serovar 13 isolates carried an additional apxIII toxin gene, unlike other characterized serovar 13 isolates [37,69]. Though the production of ApxI was also reported earlier in atypical serovar 13 isolates [69], it seems to show limited spread. In contrast, Hungarian serovar 13 isolates proved to be highly clonal: all isolates except one clustered together in two related subclusters. This conservation was confirmed by the whole-genome sequencing of representative isolates. Such high clonality is usually characteristic of highly virulent serovars such as serovars 9 and 16 in this study or serovars 1 and 5 in Canada, where the diversity of these serovars was found to be limited, especially considering isolates from animals with disease [70]. In the case of our serovar 13 isolates, two major differences were detected between the two groups of isolates. One was a carriage of a phage with a broad host range, in line with earlier reports of integrated phages as sources of variability [58]. The other difference involved the deletion of multiple genes of the type IV pilus assembly gene cluster, indicating the deficient expression of this important adhesin. Based on isolation dates, the long persistence of both groups is documented in Hungary.
Some serovar 13 isolates representing multiple farms showed resistance against tetracyclines as well as to certain beta-lactams. Resistance against these agents was markedly less frequent in other clusters. The high prevalence of resistance against these drug groups is documented in several different countries [71,72,73,74,75], which is not surprising, as these drug families are among the drugs used most frequently for prophylaxis and metaphylaxis in swine [76,77], as well as for growth promotion, where the use of antibiotics for such purposes is not banned. The tetracycline resistance genes detected were similar to those found by Blanco et al. [42], though tetO was not found.
Isolates from the same herd always showed similar resistance profiles and carried the same tetracycline resistance gene. However, isolates of the same (sub)cluster originating from different herds did not necessarily behave similarly and sometimes carried different tetracycline resistance genes, suggesting the acquisition of resistance multiple times and a lack of clones with stable drug resistance. Tetracyclines and beta-lactams are widely used for the treatment of pigs in Hungary, though herd-specific consumption data were not available. Antibiotic resistance, consequently, probably contributed minimally or not at all to the distribution patterns of most serovars, and the appearance of resistant strains is most probably driven by local antibiotic usage patterns. This is supported by the low level of resistance in the most frequent pulsotype I3.
The effect of vaccination on the present serovar distribution is probably limited, as vaccines were used in only a few farms before 2010 and the bacterin-type vaccines used offered protection only against serovars 1 and 2. The lack of serovar 1 isolates may be associated with bacterin vaccines, though this presumption is weakened by the disappearance of this serovar well before the widespread use of the vaccines. Serovar 2, in turn, remained the most frequent serovar in spite of the availability of the vaccine.
Though the increase in the frequency of serovar 13 coincided with the introduction of porcine circovirus (PCV) and porcine reproductive and respiratory virus (PRRSV) into the Hungarian pig industry (unpublished observations), systematic studies have not yet been performed to assess their predisposing role. Upcoming studies remain to be performed to assess whether there are differences between A. pleuropneumoniae serovars in their capability to cause disease synergistically with other pathogens of the porcine respiratory disease complex.
The contribution of wild boars to the spread is negligible, as all farms are closed farms, thus the risk of contact of pigs with wild boars is minimal [6].
As detailed data on the technological differences between herds shown to harbor A. pleuropneumoniae are not available, technological causes favorable for certain serovars cannot be unequivocally ruled out.

5. Conclusions

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae strains isolated from pigs in Hungary could be assigned into 16 clusters when examined with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. The results confirm the high variability of the species; some serovars showed unusual toxin gene profiles and the frequent carriage of tetracycline resistance genes. The unique serovar distribution in Hungary is probably multifactorial. Virulence differences explain the high frequency of several but not all serovars. The occurrence of other infectious agents or management factors may also play a role in the spread of certain serovars or clones. Their impact must be analyzed in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vetsci9100511/s1, Table S1: Characteristics of isolates., Table S2: Genome contiguity statistics as output by quast.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.K. and L.F.; methodology, G.K., L.L., S.M., K.B. and R.S.; software, G.K. and L.L.; validation, R.S. and L.M.; formal analysis, L.M.; investigation, K.B. and G.K.; resources, L.F.; data curation, R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, G.K.; writing—review and editing, L.F.; visualization, G.K. and L.L.; supervision, L.F.; project administration, L.F.; funding acquisition, L.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA 132833). K.B. was supported by the SA-27/2021 grant of the Eötvös Loránd Research Network.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the fact that the samples were collected by the owners and sent to diagnostics.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Raw reads are available at NCBI as Bioproject PRJNA874317. The majority of data generated during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary tables.

Acknowledgments

The expert technical assistance of Éva Székely and Teréz Halasi is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sassu, E.L.; Bossé, J.T.; Tobias, T.J.; Gottschalk, M.; Langford, P.R. Update on Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae—Knowledge, gaps and challenges. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 65 (Suppl. S1), 72–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Stringer, O.W.; Bossé, J.T.; Lacouture, S.; Gottschalk, M.; Fodor, L.; Angen, Ø.; Velazquez, E.; Penny, P.; Lei, L.; Langford, P.R.; et al. Proposal of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serovar 19, and reformulation of previous multiplex PCRs for capsule-specific typing of all known serovars. Vet. Microbiol. 2021, 255, 109021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gottschalk, M.; Broes, A. Actinobacillosis. In Diseases of Swine, 11th ed.; Zimmermann, J.J., Karriker, L.A., Ramirez, A., Schwartz, K.J., Stevenson, G.W., Zhang, J., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 749–766. [Google Scholar]
  4. Stringer, O.W.; Li, Y.; Bossé, J.T.; Langford, P.R. JMM profile: Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae: A major cause of lung disease in pigs but difficult to control and eradicate. J. Med. Microbiol. 2022, 71, 001483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. To, H.; Teshima, K.; Kon, M.; Yasuda, S.; Akaike, Y.; Shibuya, K.; Nagai, S.; Sasakawa, C. Characterization of nontypable Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae strains. J. Vet Diagn. Investig. 2020, 34, 581–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sárközi, R.; Makrai, L.; Fodor, L. Isolation of biotype 1 serotype 12 and detection of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae from wild boars. Pathogens 2022, 11, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chiers, K.; de Waele, T.; Pasmans, F.; Ducatelle, R.; Haesebrouck, F. Virulence factors of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae involved in colonisation, persistence and induction of lesions in its porcine host. Vet. Res. 2010, 41, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kamp, E.M.; Vermeulen, T.M.M.; Smits, M.A.; Haagsma, J. Production of Apx toxins by field strains of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Actinobacillus suis. Infect. Immun. 1994, 62, 4063–4065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Frey, J. RTX toxins of animal pathogens and their role as antigens in vaccines and diagnostics. Toxins 2019, 11, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pereira, M.F.; Rossi, C.C.; Seide, L.E.; Filho, S.M.; Dolinski, C.M.; Bazzoli, D.M.S. Antimicrobial resistance, biofilm formation and virulence reveal Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae strains’ pathogenicity complexity. Res. Vet. Sci. 2018, 118, 498–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nahar, N.; Turni, C.; Tram, G.; Blackall, P.J.; Atack, J.M. Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae: The molecular determinants of virulence and pathogenesis. In Advances in Microbiological Physiology; Poole, R.K., Kelly, D.J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; Volume 78, pp. 179–216. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bossé, J.T.; Janson, H.; Sheehan, B.J.; Beddek, A.J.; Rycroft, A.N.; Kroll, J.S.; Langford, P.R. Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae: Pathobiology and pathogenesis of infection. Microbes Infect. 2002, 4, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, F.; Peng, W.; Liu, T.; Zhao, H.; Yan, K.; Yuan, F.; Chen, H.; Bei, W. Biological role of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae type IV pilus proteins encoded by the apf and pil operons. Vet. Microbiol. 2018, 224, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hathroubi, S.; Hancock, M.A.; Bossé, J.T.; Langford, P.R.; Tremblay, Y.D.N.; Labrie, J.; Jacques, M. Surface polysaccharide mutant reveal that absence of O antigen reduces biofilm formation of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Infect. Immun. 2016, 84, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Aper, D.; Frömbling, J.; Bağcioğlu, M.; Ehling-Schulz, M.; Hennig-Pauka, I. Comparison of metabolic adaptation and biofilm formation of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae field isolates from the upper and lower respiratory tract of swine with respiratory disease. Vet. Microbiol. 2020, 240, 108532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Schaller, A.; Kuhn, R.; Kuhnert, P.; Nicolet, J.; Anderson, T.J.; Macinnes, J.I.; Segers, R.P.A.M.; Frey, J. Characterization of apxIVA, a new RTX determinant of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Microbiology 1999, 145, 2105–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Schaller, A.; Djordjevic, S.P.; Eamens, G.J.; Forbes, W.A.; Kuhn, R.; Kuhnert, P.; Gottschalk, M.; Nocolet, J.; Frey, J. Identification and detection of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae by PCR based on the gene apxIVA. Vet. Microbiol. 2001, 79, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sthitmatee, N.; Sirinarumitr, T.; Makonkewkeyoon, L.; Sakpuaram, T.; Tesaprateep, T. Identification of the Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype using PCR based-apx genes. Mol. Cell. Probe. 2003, 17, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Beck, M.; van Den Bosch, J.F.; Jongenelen, I.M.C.A.; Loeffen, P.L.W.; Nielsen, R.; Nicolet, J.; Frey, J. RTX toxin genotypes and phenotypes in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae field strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1994, 32, 2749–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rayamajhi, N.; Shin, S.J.; Kang, S.G.; Lee, D.Y.; Ahn, J.M.; Yoo, H.S. Development and use of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay based on Apx toxin genes for genotyping of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolates. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2005, 17, 359–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Eggen, A.A.S. Worldwide update on APP infections. Intern. Pig Topics 2007, 22, 21–23. [Google Scholar]
  22. Komal, J.P.; Mittal, K.R. Grouping of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae strains of serotypes 1 through 12 on the basis of their virulence in mice. Vet. Microbiol. 1990, 25, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Frey, J. Virulence in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and RTX toxins. Trends Microbiol. 1995, 3, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sárközi, R.; Makrai, L.; Fodor, L. Identification of a proposed new serovar of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae: Serovar 16. Acta Vet. Hung. 2015, 63, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jansen, R.; Briaire, J.; Smith, H.; Dom, P.; Haesebrouck, F.; Kamp, E.M.; Gielkens, A.L.J.; Smits, M.A. Knockout mutants of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 that are devoid of RTX toxins do not activate or kill porcine neutrophils. Infect. Immun. 1995, 63, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Teshima, K.; Hirano, H.; Ushiyama, K.; Shibuya, K.; Nagai, S.; Sasakawa, C.; To, H. Isolation and characterization of atypical Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serovar 15 lacking the apxIICA genes in Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2019, 81, 480–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rossi, C.C.; de Araújo, E.F.; de Queiroz, M.V.; Bazzolli, D.M. Characterization of the omlA gene from different serotypes of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae: A new insight into an old approach. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2013, 36, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schuwerk, L.; Hoeltig, D.; Waldmann, K.-H.; Valentin-Weigand, P.; Rohde, J. Sero- and apx-typing of German Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae field isolates from 2010 to 2019 reveals predominance of serovar 2 with regular apx-profile. Vet. Res. 2021, 52, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sárközi, R.; Makrai, L.; Fodor, L. Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotypes in Hungary. Acta Vet. Hung. 2018, 66, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Satrán, P.; Nedbalcová, K. Prevalence of serotypes, production of Apx toxins, and antibiotic resistance in strains of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolated from porcine pleuropneumonia in the Czech Republic during a period 2003–2004. Vet. Med. Czech 2002, 47, 92–98. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kucerova, Z.; Jaglic, Z.; Ondriasova, R.; Nedbalcová, K. Serotype distribution of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in the Czech Republic between 2001 and 2003. Vet. Med. Czech 2005, 50, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Y.; Bossé, J.T.; Williamson, S.M.; Maskell, D.J.; Tucker, A.W.; Wren, B.W.; Rycroft, A.N.; Langford, P.R. Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serovar predominates in England and Wales. Vet. Rec. 2018, 179, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gottschalk, M.; Lacouture, S. Distribution of Streptococcus suis (from 2012 to 2014) and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (from 2011 to 2014) serotypes isolated from diseased pigs. Canad. Vet. J. 2015, 56, 1093–1094. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lacouture, S.; Gottschalk, M. Distribution of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (from 2015 to June 2020) and Glaesserella parasuis (from 2017 to June 2020) serotypes isolated from diseased pigs in Quebec. Canad. Vet. J. 2020, 61, 1261–1263. [Google Scholar]
  35. Fodor, L.; Varga, J.; Molnár, É.; Hajtós, I. Biochemical and serological properties of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae biotype 2 strains isolated from swine. Vet. Microbiol. 1989, 20, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nielsen, R.; Andresen, L.O.; Plambeck, T.; Nielsen, J.P.; Krarup, L.T.; Jorsal, S.E. Serological characterization of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae biotype 2 strains isolated from pigs in two Danish herds. Vet. Microbiol. 1997, 54, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Maldonado, J.; Valls, L.; Martínez, E.; Riera, P. Isolation rates, serovars, and toxin genotypes of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-independent Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae among pigs suffering from pleuropneumonia in Spain. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2009, 21, 854–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Barrow, G.I.; Feltham, R.K.A. Cowan and Steels’s Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  39. Markey, B.; Leonard, F.; Archambault, M.; Maguire, D. Clinical Veterinary Microbiology, 2nd ed.; Mosby-Elsevier: Edinburgh, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  40. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals, 5th ed.; CLSI standard VET01; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ng, L.-K.; Martin, I.; Alfa, M.; Mulvey, M. Multiplex PCR for the detection of tetracycline resistant genes. Mol. Cell. Probe. 2001, 15, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Blanco, M.; Gutiérrez-Martin, C.B.; Rodríguez-Ferri, E.F.; Roberts, M.C.; Navas, J. Distribution of tetracycline resistance genes in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolates from Spain. Antimicrob. Agents Ch. 2006, 50, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Moleres, J.; Santos-López, A.; Lázaro, I.; Labairu, J.; Prat, C.; Ardanuy, C.; González-Zorn, B.; Aragon, V.; Garmendia, J. Novel blaROB-1-bearing plasmid conferring resistance to β-lactams in Haemophilus parasuis isolates from healthy weaning pigs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 3255–3267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Levy, F.; Walker, E.S. BRO beta-lactamase alleles, antibiotic resistance and a test of the BRO-1 selective replacement hypothesis in Moraxella catarrhalis. J. Antimicrob. Chemoth. 2004, 53, 371–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kardos, G.; Kiss, I. Molecular epidemiology investigation of outbreaks of fowl cholera in geographically related poultry flocks. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 2959–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chevallier, B.; Dugourd, D.; Tarasiuk, K.; Harel, J.; Gottschalk, M.; Kobisch, M.; Frey, J. Chromosome sizes and phylogenetic relationships between serotypes of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1998, 160, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Andrews, S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data; Babraham Bioinformatics; Babraham Institute: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A New Genome Assembly Algorithm and Its Applications to Single-Cell Sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Gurevich, A.; Saveliev, V.; Vyahhi, N.; Tesler, G. QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 1072–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Simão, F.A.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Ioannidis, P.; Kriventseva, E.V.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3210–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Tonkin-Hill, G.; MacAlasdair, N.; Ruis, C.; Weimann, A.; Horesh, G.; Lees, J.A.; Gladstone, R.A.; Lo, S.; Beaudoin, C.; Floto, R.A.; et al. Producing polished prokaryotic pangenomes with the Panaroo pipeline. Genome Biol. 2020, 21, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Minh, B.Q.; Schmidt, H.A.; Chernomor, O.; Schrempf, D.; Woodhams, M.D.; von Haeseler, A.; Lanfear, R. IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020, 37, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Manual]. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 21 July 2022).
  55. Yu, G.; Smith, D.K.; Zhu, H.; Guan, Y.; Lam, T.T. GGTREE: An R package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2017, 8, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; Available online: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org (accessed on 21 July 2022).
  57. Cantalapiedra, C.P.; Hernández-Plaza, A.; Letunic, I.; Bork, P.; Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional Annotation, Orthology Assignments, and Domain Prediction at the Metagenomic Scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 5825–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Prado, I.G.O.; Silva, G.C.; Crispim, J.S.; Vidigal, P.M.P.; Nascimento, M.; Santana, M.F.; Bazzoli, D.M.S. Comparative genomics of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 8 reveals the importance of prophages in the genetic variability of the species. Int. J. Genom. 2020, 2020, 9354204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Doná, V.; Ramette, A.; Perreten, V. Comparative genomics of 26 complete circular genomes of 18 different serotypes of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Microb. Genom. 2022, 8, 000776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Gutiérrez, C.B.; Rodríguez Barbosa, J.I.; Tascón, R.I.; Costa, L.I.; Riera, P.; Rodríguez Ferri, E.F. Serological characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae strains isolated from pigs in Spain. Vet. Rec. 1995, 137, 62–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Stärk, K.D.C.; Miserez, R.; Siegmann, S.; Ochs, H.; Infanger, P.; Schmidt, J. A successful national control programme for enzootic respiratory diseases in pigs in Switzerland. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 2007, 26, 595–606. [Google Scholar]
  62. Bossé, J.T.; Li, Y.; Angen, O.; Weinert, L.A.; Chaudhuri, R.R.; Holden, M.T.; Williamson, S.M.; Maskell, D.J.; Tucker, A.W.; Wren, B.W.; et al. Multiplex PCR assay for unequivocal differentiation of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serovars 1 to 3, 5 to 8, 10, and 12. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 2380–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Molnár, É. Survey of Actinobacillus (Haemophilus) pleuropneumoniae infection in swine by different methods. Acta Vet. Hung. 1990, 38, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Molnár, L. Occurrence of serotypes of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae biotype 1 in Hungary and its practical importance (in Hungarian). Magy. Allatorvosok 1992, 47, 374–378. [Google Scholar]
  65. Chiers, K.; Donné, E.; van Overbeke, I.; Ducatelle, R.; Haesebrouck, F. Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae infections in closed swine herds: Infection patterns and serological profiles. Vet. Microbiol. 2022, 85, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fussing, V.; Barfod, K.; Nielsen, R.; Moller, K.; Nielsen, J.P.; Wegener, H.C.; Bisgaard, M. Evaluation and application of ribotyping for epidemiological studies of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in Denmark. Vet. Microbiol. 1998, 62, 145–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kokotovic, B.; Angen, O. Genetic diversity of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae assessed by amplified length polymorphism analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 3921–3929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Perry, M.B.; Angen, O.; MacLean, L.L.; Lacouture, S.; Kokotovic, B.; Gottschalk, M. An atypical biotype I Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 13 is present in North America. Vet Microbiol. 2012, 156, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xu, Z.; Chen, X.; Li, L.; Wang, S.; Chen, H.; Zhou, R. Comparative genomic characterization of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 5625–5636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Chatellier, S.; Harel, J.; Dugourd, D.; Chevallier, B.; Kobisch, M.; Gottschalk, M. Genomic relatedness among Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae field strains of serotypes 1 and 5 isolated from healthy and diseased pigs. Can. J. Vet. Res. 1999, 63, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  71. Dayao, D.; Gibson, J.S.; Blackall, P.J.; Turni, C. Antimicrobial resistance genes in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Haemophilus parasuis and Pasteurella multocida isolated from Australian pigs. Aust. Vet. J. 2016, 94, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yang, C.-Y.; Lin, C.-N.; Lin, C.-F.; Chang, T.-C.; Chiou, M.-T. Serotypes, antimicrobial susceptibility, and minimal inhibitory concentrations of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolated from slaughter pigs in Taiwan (2002–2007). J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2011, 73, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Nedbalcova, K.; Satran, P.; Jaglic, Z.; Ondriasova, R.; Kucerova, Z. Monitoring of antibiotic resistance in isolates of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in the Czech Republic between 2001 and 2003. Vet. Med-Czech. 2005, 50, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. de Jong, A.; Thomas, V.; Simjee, S.; Moyaert, H.; El Garch, F.; Maher, K.; Morrissey, I.; Butty, P.; Klein, U.; Marion, H.; et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility monitoring of respiratory tract pathogens isolated from diseased cattle and pigs across Europe: The VetPath study. Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 172, 202–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. El Garch, F.; de Jong, A.; Simjee, S.; Moyaert, H.; Klein, U.; Ludwig, C.; Marion, H.; Haag-Diergarten, S.; Richard-Mater, A.; Thomas, V.; et al. Monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibility of respiratory tract pathogens isolated from diseased cattle and pigs across Europe 2009–2012. VetPath results. Vet. Microbiol. 2016, 194, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Michael, G.B.; Bossé, J.T.; Schwarz, S. Antimicrobial resistance in Pasteurellaceae of veterinary origin. Microbiol. Spectr. 2018, 6, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Callens, B.; Persoons, D.; Maes, D.; Laanen, M.; Postma, M.; Boyen, F.; Haesebrouck, F.; Butaye, P.; Catry, B.; Dewulf, J. Prophylactic and metaphylactic antimicrobial use in Belgian fattening pig herds. Prev. Vet. Med. 2012, 106, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Dendrogram of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolates based macrorestriction by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. The dendrogram was split and set side by side at the reference strain (A168) shown in both parts.
Figure 1. Dendrogram of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolates based macrorestriction by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. The dendrogram was split and set side by side at the reference strain (A168) shown in both parts.
Vetsci 09 00511 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolates reconstructed using the core genome alignment with the presence/absence of antibiotic resistance genes found.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolates reconstructed using the core genome alignment with the presence/absence of antibiotic resistance genes found.
Vetsci 09 00511 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kardos, G.; Sárközi, R.; Laczkó, L.; Marton, S.; Makrai, L.; Bányai, K.; Fodor, L. Genetic Diversity of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae Serovars in Hungary. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9100511

AMA Style

Kardos G, Sárközi R, Laczkó L, Marton S, Makrai L, Bányai K, Fodor L. Genetic Diversity of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae Serovars in Hungary. Veterinary Sciences. 2022; 9(10):511. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9100511

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kardos, Gábor, Rita Sárközi, Levente Laczkó, Szilvia Marton, László Makrai, Krisztián Bányai, and László Fodor. 2022. "Genetic Diversity of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae Serovars in Hungary" Veterinary Sciences 9, no. 10: 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9100511

APA Style

Kardos, G., Sárközi, R., Laczkó, L., Marton, S., Makrai, L., Bányai, K., & Fodor, L. (2022). Genetic Diversity of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae Serovars in Hungary. Veterinary Sciences, 9(10), 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9100511

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop