Next Article in Journal
Erratum: Lopez, J.E., et al. Tick-Borne Relapsing Fever Spirochetes in the Americas. Vet. Sci. 2016, 3, 16
Previous Article in Journal
Mycobacterium avium Subspecies paratuberculosis DNA and Antibodies in Dairy Goat Colostrum and Milk
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Colostrum and Vitamins A, D3, and E on Early Intestinal Colonization of Neonatal Holstein Calves Infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis
Open AccessArticle

Exploring the Risk Posed by Animals with an Inconclusive Reaction to the Bovine Tuberculosis Skin Test in England and Wales

1
Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health group, Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK
2
Data Systems Group, Department of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, New Haw, Addlestone KT15 3NB, UK
3
Epidemiology Group, Department of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, New Haw, Addlestone KT15 3NB, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2019, 6(4), 97; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci6040097
Received: 16 October 2019 / Revised: 21 November 2019 / Accepted: 22 November 2019 / Published: 30 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mycobacterial Diseases in Animals)
The single intradermal comparative cervical tuberculin (SICCT) test is the primary test for ante-mortem diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis (TB) in England and Wales. When an animal is first classified as an inconclusive reactor (IR) using this test, it is not subject to compulsory slaughter, but it must be isolated from the rest of the herd. To understand the risk posed by these animals, a case-control study was conducted to measure the association between IR status of animals and the odds of them becoming a reactor to the SICCT at a subsequent test. The study included all animals from herds in which only IR animals were found at the first whole herd test in 2012 and used data from subsequent tests up until the end of 2016. Separate mixed-effects logistic regression models were developed to examine the relationship between IR status and subsequent reactor status for each risk area of England and for Wales, adjusting for other explanatory variables. The odds of an animal becoming a subsequent reactor during the study period were greater for IR animals than for negative animals in the high-risk area (odds ratio (OR): 6.85 (5.98–7.86)) and edge area (OR: 8.79 (5.92–13.04)) of England and in Wales (OR: 6.87 (5.75–8.22)). In the low-risk area of England, the odds were 23 times greater, although the confidence interval around this estimate was larger due to the smaller sample size (11–48, p < 0.001). These findings support the need to explore differential controls for IR animals to reduce the spread of TB, and they highlight the importance of area-specific policies. View Full-Text
Keywords: bovine; tuberculosis; SICCT; inconclusive; reactor; tuberculin bovine; tuberculosis; SICCT; inconclusive; reactor; tuberculin
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

May, E.; Prosser, A.; Downs, S.H.; Brunton, L.A. Exploring the Risk Posed by Animals with an Inconclusive Reaction to the Bovine Tuberculosis Skin Test in England and Wales. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 97.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop