Next Article in Journal
Histology of the Ovary of the Laying Hen (Gallus domesticus)
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Reproductive Disorders and Leptospirosis: A Case Study in a Mixed-Species Farm (Cattle and Swine)
Article Menu
Issue 4 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Vet. Sci. 2017, 4(4), 65;

Risk Factors Associated with Brucella Seropositivity in Sheep and Goats in Duhok Province, Iraq

1,3,†,* , 1
College of Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Australia
College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Mosul 41002, Iraq
High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21516, Egypt
China-Australia Joint Research and Training Center for Veterinary Epidemiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430072, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Chrissanthy Papadopoulou, Vangelis Economou and Hercules Sakkas
Received: 23 October 2017 / Revised: 29 November 2017 / Accepted: 5 December 2017 / Published: 7 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food and Waterborne Infections in Animals and Humans)
Full-Text   |   PDF [218 KB, uploaded 7 December 2017]


Sera from 432 small ruminants (335 sheep and 97 goats) from 72 farms in Duhok Province, northern Iraq, were collected to investigate risk factors associated with brucellosis seropositivity. Serum samples were tested using the Rose Bengal test (RBT) and an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). Using parallel interpretation, RBT and iELISA results showed that 31.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 26.1, 36.3) of sheep and 34.0% (95% CI: 24.7, 44.3) of goats had antibodies against Brucella in the study area. A random-effects multivariable logistic regression model indicated that a higher chance of being seropositive (odds ratio (OR) = 1.7; 95% 1.4; 2.2) was associated with an increase in the age of animals. The odds of Brucella seropositivity in flocks where sheep and goats grazed together was 2.0 times higher (95% CI: 1.08; 3.9) compared to flocks where sheep and goats grazed separately. The odds of Brucella seropositivity in small ruminants was 2.2 higher (95% CI: 1.2; 4.3) for animals originating from farms with a history of goat abortion in the preceding 12 months. In contrast, for every 1000 Iraqi Dinars (~0.85 US Dollar) spent by the farmers on control of Brucella in their flocks, the odds of Brucella seropositivity decreased significantly (OR = 0.9, p-value = 0.021). The final model also indicated significant differences in Brucella seropositivity between the different districts of Duhok Province. This study provides a contribution to the epidemiology of brucellosis in small ruminants in northern Iraq. View Full-Text
Keywords: brucellosis; small ruminants; abortion; risk factors; Iraq brucellosis; small ruminants; abortion; risk factors; Iraq
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Alhamada, A.G.; Habib, I.; Barnes, A.; Robertson, I. Risk Factors Associated with Brucella Seropositivity in Sheep and Goats in Duhok Province, Iraq. Vet. Sci. 2017, 4, 65.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Vet. Sci. EISSN 2306-7381 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top