Next Article in Journal
ColorDetect RT-LAMP Assay for the Rapid, Sensitive, and Specific Detection of Porcine Abortion-Associated Pestivirus (PAAPeV)
Previous Article in Journal
From Paddock to Foal: Prevalence and Genotypic Diversity of Rhodococcus equi on Stud Farms in Türkiye
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Temporal Dynamics of T Cell Immunity Induced by TbpBY167A Vaccine in Colostrum-Deprived Piglets Challenged with Glaesserella parasuis

by
Alba González-Fernández
1,2,*,
María José García-Iglesias
1,3,*,
César B. Gutiérrez-Martín
1,2,
Óscar Mencía-Ares
1,2 and
Sonia Martínez-Martínez
1,2
1
Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad de León, 24071 León, Spain
2
Instituto de Desarrollo Ganadero y Sanidad Animal (INDEGSAL), Universidad de León, 24071 León, Spain
3
Instituto de Biomedicina (IBIOMED), Universidad de León, 24071 León, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2026, 13(1), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13010073
Submission received: 18 December 2025 / Revised: 5 January 2026 / Accepted: 8 January 2026 / Published: 11 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Veterinary Microbiology, Parasitology and Immunology)

Simple Summary

Glaesserella parasuis is an important cause of respiratory and systemic disease in piglets, leading to animal welfare issues and economic losses in pig production. The high antigenic diversity of this bacterium makes it difficult to develop vaccines that provide broad and reliable protection. In this study, colostrum-deprived piglets were vaccinated with a genetically modified form of a bacterial surface protein that is involved in iron acquisition, and later exposed to infection under experimental conditions. Blood samples were collected at different time points to analyze how the immune system responded to vaccination and subsequent infection. Vaccinated animals showed a marked increase in several lymphocyte populations, including cells with cytotoxic activity and cells with a long-lasting response to the pathogen. These changes were observed only after booster vaccination and again shortly after infection, and were associated with protection against disease. Overall, these findings indicate that this vaccine candidate can stimulate a coordinated cellular immune response that may contribute to improved control of Glaesserella parasuis infections in pig herds.

Abstract

Glaesserella parasuis (G. parasuis) is a key pathogen responsible for swine respiratory disease, and the development of broadly protective vaccines is hampered by its high antigenic diversity. The iron-acquisition protein TbpB is a conserved vaccine candidate, but the cellular immune responses it elicits, particularly T-cell subset dynamics during immunization and challenge, remain insufficiently defined. This study characterized these responses after oral immunization of colostrum-deprived piglets with the TbpBY167A mutant. Ten colostrum-deprived piglets were allocated to immunized and non-immunized (PBS) groups, immunized at days 15 and 30 of life and subsequently challenged with G. parasuis (45 days old); peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected at baseline, after each immunization, and at 1 and 3 days post-infection. Multiparametric flow cytometry was used to quantify major leukocyte subsets and T-cell phenotypes defined by sIgM, CD172a, CD3, TCRγδ, CD8α/β, CD4 and CD27 expression. Booster immunization induced significant expansion of B cells (p < 0.01), TCRγδ T cells (p < 0.01), CD8+ αβ T cells (p < 0.001) and CD4+ memory T cells (p < 0.01) in immunized piglets compared with controls. After challenge, CD8+ cytotoxic T cells in immunized animals rapidly shifted from naïve to memory phenotypes, peaking at 48–72 h (p < 0.01). These biphasic T-cell dynamics are consistent with the protective efficacy previously demonstrated for this vaccine in colostrum-deprived piglets, and support a key contribution of TCRγδ, CD8+ cytotoxic and CD4+ memory T cells to immunity against G. parasuis and to the design of next-generation vaccines.

1. Introduction

The swine industry faces significant economic challenges, with Glässer’s disease being one of the most relevant [1]. This disease is caused by Glaesserella parasuis (G. parasuis), a pathogen that colonizes the upper respiratory tract of pigs and, under stressful conditions such as weaning or transport, can trigger severe systemic infections [2]. In addition, this bacterium is one of the secondary pathogens included in the porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC), where it plays a major role in coinfections and contributes to the severity of respiratory disease in pigs [3,4]. Piglets in the early stages of lactation and fattening are particularly vulnerable, resulting in elevated morbidity and mortality rates [5].
Vaccination remains the most effective approach for preventing and controlling Glässer’s disease; however, the lack of a universal commercial vaccine and the high genetic and antigenic variability among strains limit the efficacy of current autogenous vaccines [6]. Thus, the search for effective heterogenous vaccines is an open line of research where some virulence factors have been characterized, but the complete pathogenic profile of G. parasuis remains poorly defined. In this context, it has been demonstrated that G. parasuis employs virulence mechanisms to establish infection, such as iron acquisition from porcine transferrin, mediated by the surface proteins TbpA and TbpB, which facilitate bacterial survival in iron-restricted environments like mucosal surfaces [7,8,9,10]. In addition, Martínez-Martínez et al. [11] demonstrated that the TbpB protein can elicit both B and T cell responses in pigs, supporting its relevance as a vaccine antigen. Therefore, subunit vaccines, particularly those incorporating targeted mutations of TbpA and TbpB, represent a promising strategy for achieving broader and more consistent protection [7,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
Cellular immune responses, particularly those mediated by T lymphocytes, are fundamental for host defense against bacterial infections and play an essential role in the development of effective vaccines in swine and other species [18]. T cells recognize pathogens in an antigen-specific manner via their unique surface receptors, and upon activation, proliferate and secrete cytokines that orchestrate a coordinated immune response [18]. In the porcine model, both CD4+ helper and CD8+ cytotoxic T cell subsets contribute to pathogen clearance and shape the outcome of infection with a range of bacterial agents, including G. parasuis [15,19]. Although humoral factors such as antibody production are important, emerging evidence indicates that T cell-mediated immunity is central for controlling G. parasuis infection and for achieving vaccine-induced protection [19,20]. However, detailed phenotypic and functional characterization of T cell subpopulations in the context of natural or experimental infection by G. parasuis remains scarce. Only a few studies to date have used flow cytometry or similar immunophenotypic approaches to track changes in CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T lymphocyte compartments in G. parasuis-infected pigs or after immunization with subunit vaccine, revealing that infection can lead to dynamic alterations in these subsets and underlining the need for further studies in this field [15,21]. The immune changes described previously included leukopenia [22], reductions in CD25+ (a marker of T cell activation) and CD3+ T cells, and increases in αIgM+ B cells, monocytes, and granulocytes in G. parasuis-infected pigs [21]. However, a deeper understanding of the specific lymphocyte subsets involved in protective immunity remains lacking. Therefore, this study investigates the temporal dynamics of the peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) subpopulations in colostrum-deprived piglets immunized with a subunit vaccine based on a modified TbpB (mutant Y167A) and subsequently challenged with highly virulent field isolates of G. parasuis. The aim is to better define the cellular mechanisms underlying vaccine-induced protection with particular attention to T lymphocyte subpopulations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Isolate, Growth Conditions and Dose Preparation for Experimental Infection

Three highly virulent field isolates of G. parasuis (serovars 1, 4 and 7) were used for experimental challenge as part of a broader investigation on protection against Glasser’s disease [17]. All strains were cultured from frozen stocks onto chocolate agar plates (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h under microaerophilic conditions. Inoculum preparation followed a standardized protocol: colonies were resuspended in pleuropneumonia-like organism (PPLO) broth (Pronadisa, Madrid, Spain) supplemented with nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) (2 µL/mL of 20 mg/mL stock) and glucose (5 µL/mL of 50% v/v stock) and grown at 37 °C with shaking until mid-log phase (OD600 0.1–0.2). Cultures were then expanded in fresh medium to an optical density (OD600) of 0.025–0.03, centrifuged at 1300× g for at least 25 min, and resuspended in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA). Viable bacterial concentrations (CFU/mL) were determined by serial dilution plating as previously described [17].

2.2. Experimental Design

This study involved 10 colostrum-deprived Landrace × Large-White piglets, reared artificially as described by Guizzo et al. [15]. All animals were confirmed free of G. parasuis by PCR analysis of nasal swabs prior to the experiment. Piglets were randomly assigned to two groups with five in each group and housed in separate rooms within biosafety level 2 facilities.
The experiment was carried out in two phases, following the protocol described in a previous study [17]. In the first phase, five piglets received oral mucosal immunization with two doses of the TbpBY167A mutant vaccine [23], administered on days 15 and 30 of age. The remaining animals served as non-immunized controls and were given two administrations of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) in equivalent volumes. The second phase started on day 45 (15 days after the booster dose), when both groups were intranasally challenged with a field isolate of G. parasuis at a final dose of 5 × 106 CFU. This challenge phase lasted 7 days, after which all surviving piglets were euthanized.
All procedures involving animals were reviewed and approved by the Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of the University of León (OEBA-ULE-016-2023). Piglet handling was performed by licensed veterinarians and trained personnel in compliance with current Spanish and European Union regulations (Royal Decree 53/2013 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes; Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes). Upon arrival, all animals underwent a clinical health evaluation and were closely monitored throughout the study.

2.3. Isolation and Cryopreservation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells

Peripheral blood was aseptically collected from the jugular vein of manually restrained pigs using a vacutainer system. Needle gauges (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) of 20 G or 18 G were used depending on the size and age of the animals (20 G needles for younger, smaller piglets and 18 G needles for older, larger pigs) to ensure safe and efficient blood collection. Blood samples were transferred into 4 mL EDTA-coated tubes containing 7.2 mg of K3-EDTA (BD Vacutainer®, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for PBMC isolation. Samples were collected at five time points corresponding to three experimental periods: (a) baseline, immediately before administration of the first vaccine dose (day 15), to establish profiles of the evaluated immune cell subpopulations without subsequent statistical comparison; (b) post-vaccination, prior to the second immunization (day 30) and after the second immunization but before infection (day 45); and (c) post-infection, including 1 and 3 days post-infection (dpi).
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from anticoagulated blood by density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll-Paque™ (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), following the protocol described in another study [12] with slight modifications. Briefly, 6 mL of Ficoll-Paque™ was carefully layered beneath 3 mL of whole blood in a glass tube (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA). The samples were centrifuged at room temperature (20 °C) for 35 min at 650× g without brake. Mononuclear cells (lymphocytes and monocytes) were collected from the interphase between the Ficoll-Paque™ and the plasma. The PBMCs were then washed twice with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA)by centrifugation at 450× g for 10 min with brake, and the resulting pellet was resuspended in 1.5 mL of cryopreservation medium consisting of 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA) and 90% FBS, then transferred to cryovials of 2 mL (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).
For cryopreservation, the cryovials containing resuspended PBMCs were placed into alcohol-filled freezing containers (100% isopropanol) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to ensure a controlled cooling rate and reduce cell mortality. These containers were kept at –80 °C for 24 h. After this initial freezing step, the vials were transferred to a liquid nitrogen storage tank for long-term preservation.

2.4. Flow Cytometry

2.4.1. Staining and Immune Cell Count

PBMCs were thawed by briefly opening the cryovials to release internal pressure. Cells were immediately transferred to 1 mL of 1× PBS supplemented with 2% fetal calf serum (FCS) or FACS buffer (1× PBS containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin and 0.01% sodium azide), depending on the downstream application. Following centrifugation at 300× g for 7 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was discarded, and the cell pellet was resuspended in up to 10 mL of PBS + 2% FCS.
Cell viability and concentration were assessed by Trypan Blue exclusion (1:10 dilution, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and cell counts were performed individually for each animal. Based on the total yield and required final volume, cell suspensions were adjusted to achieve a concentration of 1 × 106 cells per 200 µL. Subsequently, 200 µL of this suspension was added to each well of V-bottom 96-well plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA), ensuring 1 × 106 cells per well.
After an additional centrifugation step (3 min at 300× g and 4 °C), pellets were gently loosened by vortexing and washed twice more in 1× PBS. Viability staining was performed using the LIVE/DEAD™ Fixable Aqua Dead Cell Stain Kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA). The dye was diluted in dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO), and 200 µL of the working solution (PBS + Live/Dead reagent) was added per well, followed by incubation for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark.
Blocking was carried out using FACS buffer supplemented with 5% goat serum and 5% porcine serum (50 µL/well), except when surface immunoglobulins were to be detected, in which case porcine serum was omitted to avoid cross-reactivity. After 15 min of incubation at 4 °C, cells were washed twice with FACS buffer.
Primary monoclonal antibodies or hybridoma supernatants were prepared according to the experimental design and added to each well, followed by 30 min of incubation at 4 °C. After washing, secondary antibodies were diluted in FACS buffer containing 5% porcine serum and added to each well (50 µL/well), followed by a further 30 min incubation at 4 °C. A second blocking step using 10% normal mouse serum in FACS buffer (50 µL/well) was performed for 15 min at 4 °C prior to streptavidin addition, followed by three washes.
Finally, cells were resuspended in 200 µL of FACS buffer and transferred to pre-labeled cytometry tubes (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA) containing 300 µL of fixation buffer (0.1% paraformaldehyde in FACS buffer), unless immediate acquisition was planned, in which case fixation was omitted. A total of 80,000 events were acquired in a FACSCanto II cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and data were analyzed with FlowJo software v10.10.0 (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Lymphocyte populations were identified based on their distribution in forward scatter (FSC) versus side scatter (SSC) dot plots. The analysis was performed using absolute values, calculated for each subpopulation by multiplying the total number of acquired events by the percentages obtained from sequential gating.

2.4.2. Immunostaining Panels

All immunostaining panels used throughout the present study are detailed in Table 1.
Primary monoclonal antibodies were hybridoma supernatants generously donated by the Porcine Immunology Laboratory of INIA (Spain), except for clones PGB22A (Kingfisher Biotech, Saint Paul, MN, USA) and PG164A (Kingfisher Biotech, Saint Paul, MN, USA). Secondary antibodies were commercial antibodies obtained from Southern Biotech (SB) (Birmingham, AL, USA) or BD-Biosciences (BDB) (San Jose, CA, USA) and they are conjugated to phycoerythrin (PE), phycoerythrin-Cyanine 7 (PECy7), allophycocyanine (APC) or streptavidin-BrilliantViolet421 (StrAv-BV421).
These panels were specifically chosen as they are widely used in vaccine response studies to characterize key porcine PBMC subsets, focusing on the immune response to immunization rather than differentiating between health and disease states [24,25]. These panels were designed to comprehensively characterize porcine PBMCs at key experimental time points, including pre-vaccination, post-vaccination, and post-infection. The first set of panels allowed identification of major leukocyte subsets, including T, B, NK, and myeloid cells (monocytes), whereas additional panels focused on T cell subpopulations, distinguishing naïve, memory, and cytotoxic subsets.
Combined panels applied after bacterial challenge integrated these markers to enable broader profiling of both major leukocyte populations and T cell differentiation or activation states. Appropriate controls were included in all experiments to ensure accurate gating and assessment of non-specific staining. These comprised fluorescence-minus-one (FMO), unstained, and isotype-matched samples. Irrelevant hybridoma supernatants used as isotype controls included 4B9 (IgG1), 1E12 (IgG2a), 3E4 (IgG2b), and 3E6 (IgG1, biotin-conjugated), matched by isotype to the primary antibodies in each panel. All hybridoma supernatants (primary monoclonal antibodies) were generously donated by the Porcine Immunology Laboratory of INIA (Madrid, Spain), except for clone PGB22A (Kingfisher Biotech, Saint Paul, MN, USA) and PG164A (Kingfisher Biotech, Saint Paul, MN, USA).
All antibodies from the panels were titrated prior to the study to determine optimal working concentrations. Serial dilutions were prepared in FACS buffer and tested using PBMCs from a healthy adult pig. The dilution selected for use in the study was the highest concentration that did not produce significant alterations in population frequencies or staining intensities, ensuring signal specificity and minimizing background fluorescence while maintaining clear immunophenotypic resolution.
The lymphocyte subpopulations analyzed and their phenotypic characterization are shown in Table 2.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 29.0 (IBM, SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY, USA). Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. To compare immunized and non-immunized animals, independent-samples t-tests were conducted for each staining panel after checking normality (Shapiro–Wilk) and homogeneity of variances (Levene’s test). Population dynamics over time after the first and second vaccine doses were evaluated using a generalized linear model (GLM) with estimated marginal means, including five distinct T cell subpopulations and immunization status (immunized vs. non-immunized) as a fixed factor (see Table 2 for details of the analyzed T cell subpopulations and their markers). Across these analyses, multiple testing arising from the evaluation of several cell populations and time points was addressed by applying Bonferroni correction to all pairwise comparisons within each panel or model to control for type I error. Following infection, paired-samples t-tests were performed to analyze changes in T cell subpopulations within the same animals at 1 and 3 dpi. Due to the limited number of non-immunized animals at 3 dpi (n = 2), statistical analysis at these time points was restricted to immunized animals. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant while p-values < 0.1 were considered as a trend. Graphs and figures were generated using GraphPad Prism version 10.6.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and SPSS software, and flow cytometry plots were created using FlowJo version 10.9.0 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Response of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Immune Cells to Immunization

Analysis of PBMCs following the administration of the first vaccine dose revealed no statistically significant differences in monocyte, B cell or T cell populations between immunized and non-immunized pigs (Figure 1A). Thus, the response to a single dose of the vaccine only showed a trend towards significance in the number of NK cells represented by a reduced count in the non-immunized pigs compared to those immunized (p < 0.1).
Interestingly, the results obtained on day 45 (after the second vaccine dose) revealed more noteworthy changes in immune cell composition. Immunized piglets exhibited significantly higher B cell counts (p < 0.05) and a markedly increased number of total T cells (p < 0.001) compared to non-immunized ones (Figure 1B). However, no significant differences were detected in monocyte or NK cell counts associated with the immunization with two doses.

3.2. T Cell Subpopulations Dynamics Following Immunization

To assess the immunological impact of immunization, five T cell subpopulations (TCRγδ, CD8+, CD4+ naïve and memory cells and double-negative αβ cells) were quantified in samples from immunized and non-immunized animals (Table 2).
The results obtained indicated that administration of a single dose did not induce statistically significant differences associated with immunization in any of the five evaluated subpopulations (Figure 2A). However, after the second dose, immunized animals exhibited significant increases across both major T cell compartments (TCRγδ and αβ) (Figure 2B). Specifically, both TCRγδ cells (CD3+ TCRγδ+) (p < 0.01) and CD3+ TCRγδ cells (p < 0.01) showed notable expansion, with the CD8+ αβ cells subset demonstrating a particularly marked increase (p < 0.01). Within the CD4+ αβ compartment, both naïve (p < 0.01) and memory (p < 0.01) subsets also expanded substantially. Among non-conventional populations, double-negative αβ cells were also significantly elevated (p < 0.001).

3.3. Early Immune Response to Immunization After Infection

In the post-infection period, no significant differences were detected in the counts of major PBMC subsets (monocytes, B cells, T cells, and NK cells) between immunized and non-immunized animals at either 1 or 3 dpi (Figure 3C). However, at 3 dpi, only two non-immunized pigs remained, so data for this group are shown descriptively and statistical analyses were restricted to paired comparisons within the immunized animals (Figure 3D). Paired comparisons within immunized pigs of the six T cell subpopulations revealed marked changes in the CD8+ compartment. Specifically, naïve CTL cells significantly decreased from day 1 to day 3 post-infection (p < 0.05), while memory CTL cells significantly increased over the same period (p < 0.05) (Figure 3A,B), indicating a rapid shift from a naïve to a memory phenotype. In contrast, CD4+ subsets (naïve and memory) remained stable, and while a trend toward decrease was noted in naïve non-CTL T cells (p < 0.1), no significant changes were observed in the non-CTL memory subset.

4. Discussion

G. parasuis remains a significant and complex pathogen in swine medicine, causing severe polyserositis, arthritis, and meningitis, especially in young pigs. Its genetic diversity and variable virulence result in frequent outbreaks even in well-managed herds [1,26,27]. Conventional bacterins have limited efficacy due to suboptimal cross-protection and rapid strain evolution, driving efforts to develop recombinant vaccines targeting conserved antigens such as TbpB, capable of eliciting both humoral and cellular immunity [6,15,17,20,28,29]. However, the complex interplay between innate and adaptive immune responses in pigs, characterized by a high proportion of unconventional T cell subsets and unique lymphocyte ontogeny, necessitates a deeper understanding of vaccine-induced cellular dynamics to optimize protection [30,31].This study addresses the knowledge gap about vaccine-induced immune cellular dynamics by providing a detailed temporal analysis of cellular immunity elicited by a recombinant TbpB-based vaccine, advancing our understanding of progressive lymphocyte activation essential for sustained protection against G. parasuis infection. Building upon the framework proposed by Frandoloso et al. [28], who first emphasized the immunological relevance of conserved antigens and the limitations of conventional bacterins, our findings provide functional evidence of coordinated lymphocyte activation supporting lasting immunity against this bacterium. The protective efficacy of the TbpBY167A vaccine, in terms of survival, clinical scores and lesion severity after G. parasuis challenge, has been reported in detail for this vaccine in the same colostrum-deprived piglet challenge model [17], and the present work specifically expands on the cellular correlates of that protection.
In the initial phase of our study, the absence of statistically significant differences in the general immune cell subpopulations associated with the administration of the first TbpBY167A vaccine dose, prior to infection, does not necessarily indicate a lack of initial immunological priming, but rather reflects the natural kinetics of immune priming, where phenotypic changes in lymphocyte populations manifest progressively after initial sensitization, as described in other porcine vaccine studies. Thus, Zhang et al. [32] demonstrated that immunization against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (a Gram-negative respiratory pathogen similar to G. parasuis in terms of disease presentation and immunological mechanisms in swine) with a combinatorial bacterin vaccine induced CD4+ T cell responses, but these responses were significantly amplified following booster immunization rather than after the primary vaccine dose, confirming that substantial alterations in T cell phenotype generally require additional antigen exposure in the porcine model. Likewise, the trend toward reduced NK cell frequency in non-immunized animals after the inoculation of the first dose of the TbpBY167A vaccine may suggest early modulation of the innate immune compartment, potentially reflecting the initial engagement of the immune system by the vaccine. Similar transient reductions in systemic NK cell populations have been documented following bacterial immunization in pigs. In this sense, Bilhare et al. reported a significant decrease in NK cell frequencies at day 7 post-live attenuated Salmonella typhimurium immunization, which rebounded by day 14, illustrating early but progressive innate activation [33].
An interesting finding was the markedly different immune response following the second TbpBY167A vaccine dose, with more pronounced changes in the immune cell composition. Thus, the significantly higher B cell counts in the immunized piglets indicate an effective activation of the humoral component of the adaptive immune response. Expansion of B cells post-vaccination is a well-established biomarker of vaccine efficacy, as these cells are responsible for antibody production and long-term protection against bacterial pathogens [34]. In the context of vaccines targeting extracellular bacteria such as G. parasuis, the humoral response is essential for generating neutralizing antibodies that can prevent colonization and systemic spread [35]. The findings of the present study are consistent with previous research showing that successful immunization against other pathogens in pigs with two doses leads to a marked increase in B cell populations and antibody titers, correlating with protection against the disease [24,36]. Furthermore, the markedly increased number of total T cells in immunized animals compared to non-immunized ones reflects a cellular basis for long-term immunological memory. It should be noted that the T cell expansion post-vaccination is associated with the development of antigen-specific memory populations capable of rapid and effective responses upon subsequent exposure to the pathogen. Studies in pigs have demonstrated that robust T cell responses, including both helper T cells (CD4+, which coordinate immune responses and support antibody production) and cytotoxic T cells (CD8+, which directly eliminate infected cells), are essential for optimal vaccine-induced protection, especially against bacterial infections, where cellular immunity complements humoral mechanisms [15,18,19,30]. The expansion of T cells in our study aligns with the expected kinetics of adaptive immune maturation following booster immunization, supporting the establishment of long-term protective immunity.
Based on our results, the T-cell response elicited by the primary and booster doses revealed a well-defined trajectory of adaptive immune maturation. Following the initial immunization, the comparable frequencies of TCRγδ cells, CD8+ αβ T cells, naïve and memory CD4+ subsets, and double-negative αβ T-cell populations between vaccinated and control animals suggest the establishment of an early priming phase rather than the absence of immunological activation. In contrast, the booster dose induced a marked expansion across all assessed T-cell compartments, with a particularly pronounced increase in TCRγδ T cells. This selective amplification highlights their intermediary function in integrating innate and adaptive immune pathways, consistent with previous findings in pigs challenged with extracellular bacterial pathogens such as A. pleuropneumoniae [32]. In the context of G. parasuis, the antigenic complexity and immune-evasion strategies described by Frandoloso et al. [28] likely shape these cellular dynamics, reinforcing the relevance of conserved antigens such as TbpB as targets for next-generation vaccines. Recent evidence further indicates that porcine TCRγδ T cells undergo preferential expansion upon secondary antigenic stimulation and exhibit potent cytotoxic activity characterized by the upregulation of canonical effector molecules [37]. These cytolytic properties enable γδ T cells to directly recognize and eliminate stressed or infected host cells, thereby supporting their distinctive role at the interface of innate defense mechanisms and the development of adaptive immunological memory. Moreover, cross-species comparative analyses corroborate that this dual functionality (rapid recall expansion coupled with strong cytotoxic capacity) constitutes a defining feature of γδ T cells in effective vaccine-induced and infection-driven immunity [38].
Concurrently, the pronounced increase in cytotoxic CD8+ αβ T cells aligns with evidence that these effector populations undergo robust clonal expansion following booster immunization, thereby enhancing pathogen clearance capacity [24]. Within the CD4+ compartment, the expansion of naïve and memory-phenotype subsets is consistent with swine vaccination studies showing that balanced CD4+ T cell memory responses support long-term helper function for both humoral and cellular immunity [39]. Finally, the recruitment of double-negative αβ and γδ T cells reveals the contribution of nonconventional T lineages to the vaccine-induced cellular repertoire, suggesting an additional layer of immunological breadth that may strengthen protection against diverse pathogens, consistent with studies documenting proliferative and cytotoxic functions of γδ T cells in vaccine-mediated protection and in porcine models [37,38]. To the best of our knowledge, detailed phenotypic and functional characterization of double-negative αβ T cells in pigs is still very limited, particularly in the context of vaccination or protection against extracellular bacterial pathogens [40]. Nevertheless, the expansion of this subset after booster immunization is compatible with roles described for double-negative T cells in other species, where they can exert regulatory or unconventional effector functions, suggesting that porcine double-negative αβ T cells might contribute to the fine-tuning and breadth of the vaccine-induced response, a possibility that warrants dedicated functional studies. From a practical perspective, the biphasic expansion of memory-phenotype CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, together with the recruitment of γδ and double-negative αβ T cells, suggests that successful control of Glässer’s disease will require vaccines capable of inducing robust and durable T-cell responses in addition to antibodies. Vaccine platforms and adjuvants that enhance mucosal priming, promote cytotoxic CD8+ and γδ T-cell responses, and support the development of long-lived CD4+ memory cells may therefore be particularly advantageous for future G. parasuis vaccines. Our findings provide a cellular framework that can help guide the selection of adjuvants and delivery routes to preferentially drive these T-cell signatures. However, a limitation of the present study is that we did not directly assess effector functions such as cytokine production or cytotoxic activity of the expanding CD8+ αβ and TCRγδ T-cell subsets; thus, their contribution to bacterial clearance and protection is inferred from phenotype and kinetics rather than demonstrated experimentally.
The early immune response dynamics observed in our study align with established patterns of host activation during bacterial infections in swine. The absence of marked differences in circulating lymphocyte subsets at 1 and 3 dpi is compatible with the temporal kinetics of adaptive responses, in which transcriptional and functional reprogramming in blood precede overt phenotypic shifts in immune cell populations, as shown in transcriptomic studies of pigs experimentally infected with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium [41]. The rapid conversion from naïve to memory phenotype within the CD8+ CTL compartment between 1 and 3 dpi is consistent with previous findings in swine models, where CD8+ T cells undergo accelerated differentiation to effector and memory states within days of antigenic stimulation, as demonstrated after immunization and challenge with Classical Swine Fever virus (CSFV) [24]. This phenomenon, described in experimental G. parasuis infections in pigs, reflects the capacity of previously primed CD8+ T cells to rapidly acquire memory properties and exert recall responses following booster immunization, as evidenced by functional T-cell memory and efficient bacterial clearance post-challenge [39]. The compartment-specific nature of these changes, with CD8+ populations showing rapid phenotypic and functional alterations and CD4+ subsets remaining comparatively stable, agrees with previous observations in swine models where cytotoxic T lymphocytes display preferential activation and expansion during early challenge. However, CD4+ helper subsets maintain stability due to their distinct activation requirements and kinetics, as demonstrated after immunization and virulent CSFV infection [24]. Despite these consistent patterns, our interpretation of early post-challenge dynamics is constrained by the small group size and the reduced number of surviving non-immunized pigs at 3 dpi. Consequently, post-infection findings should be considered descriptive and primarily supportive of the more robust differences detected after booster vaccination.

5. Conclusions

Taken together with recent evidence underscoring the biological relevance of distinct T-cell subsets as correlates of protective immunity, our findings underscore the value of flow cytometry as a robust analytical approach for dissecting the complexity of the porcine T-lymphocyte compartment. Our integrative cytometric assessment reveals a well-defined biphasic pattern of cellular immune activation following recombinant TbpB vaccination, characterized by an initial priming phase after the first dose and a pronounced expansion of multiple lymphocyte subsets upon booster administration. The rapid transition from naïve to memory CD8+ cytotoxic T cells within 48–72 h post-infection reflects a heightened state of vaccine-induced immune readiness and further substantiates the functional relevance of conserved TbpB antigens. These coordinated cellular dynamics, encompassing both conventional and unconventional T-cell lineages, strongly support the notion that the protective efficacy and cross-reactive immunity observed against heterologous G. parasuis strains arise from this accelerated and diversified adaptive response.
Future studies integrating longitudinal cellular profiling with transcriptomic and molecular analyses in relevant target tissues will be essential to elucidate the underlying mechanisms driving these immune responses. Such insights are expected to inform the rational design of next-generation vaccines, ultimately enabling broader and more durable protection against Glässer’s disease.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G.-F. and S.M.-M.; methodology, A.G.-F.; software, M.J.G.-I. and Ó.M.-A.; validation, M.J.G.-I., C.B.G.-M. and S.M.-M.; formal analysis, A.G.-F. and M.J.G.-I.; investigation, A.G.-F.; resources, S.M.-M.; data curation, A.G.-F. and M.J.G.-I.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G.-F.; writing—review and editing, M.J.G.-I., C.B.G.-M., Ó.M.-A. and S.M.-M.; visualization, M.J.G.-I. and C.B.G.-M.; supervision, S.M.-M.; project administration, S.M.-M.; funding acquisition, S.M.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication is part of the I + D + i project PID2019-105125RB-I00, funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spanish Government). Alba González-Fernández hold a grant from the University of León.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures involving animals were reviewed and approved by the Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of the University of León (OEBA-ULE-016-2023). Piglet handling was performed by licensed veterinarians and trained personnel in compliance with current Spanish and European Union regulations (Royal Decree 53/2013 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes; Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was not required because the study did not involve the prospective recruitment of human participants.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the scientists of INIA-CSIC (Madrid, Spain) for their valuable assistance with flow cytometry analyses. In particular, we wish to thank Javier Domínguez and Concepción Revilla for their generous advice and training in porcine immunophenotyping, as well as for providing the hybridoma supernatants used for antibody staining in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
APCallophycocyanin
CDcluster of differentiation
CFUcolony-forming units
CTLcytotoxic T lymphocytes
DMSOdimethyl sulfoxide
Dpidays post-infection
FBSfetal bovine serum
FMOfluorescence minus one
FSCforward scatter
GLMgeneralized linear model
NADnicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
NKnatural killer
ODoptical density
PBMCsperipheral blood mononuclear cells
PBSphosphate-buffered saline
PEphycoerythrin
PECy7phycoerythrin-cyanine 7
PPLOpleuropneumonia-like organisms
RPMIRoswell Park Memorial Institute medium
SIgMsurface immunoglobulin M
SSCside scatter
StrAv-BV421streptavidin-brilliant violet 421
TbpBtransferrin-binding protein B
TCRT cell receptor

References

  1. Aragón, V.; Segalés, J.; Oliveira, S. Glässer’s disease. In Diseases of Swine; Zimmerman, J.J., Karriker, L.A., Ramirez, A., Schwartz, K.J., Stevenson, G.W., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 760–769. ISBN 978-0-8138-2267-9. [Google Scholar]
  2. Eberle, K.C.; Hau, S.J.; Luan, S.L.; Weinert, L.A.; Stasko, J.A.; Wang, J.; Peters, S.E.; Langford, P.R.; Rycroft, A.N.; Wren, B.W.; et al. Generation and evaluation of a Glaesserella (Haemophilus) parasuis capsular mutant. Infect. Immun. 2020, 88, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Brockmeier, S.L.; Halbur, P.G.; Thacker, E.L. Porcine respiratory disease complex. In Polymicrobial Diseases; Brodgen, K., Guthmiller, J., Eds.; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2002; pp. 231–258. [Google Scholar]
  4. Opriessnig, T.; Giménez-Lirola, L.G.; Halbur, P.G. Polymicrobial respiratory disease in pigs. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2011, 12, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Eddicks, M.; Eddicks, L.; Stadler, J.; Hermanns, W.; Ritzmann, M. The porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC)—A clinical review. Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere 2021, 49, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, H.; Xue, Q.; Zeng, Q.; Zhao, Z. Haemophilus parasuis vaccines. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2016, 180, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Martínez, S.; Frandoloso, R.; Rodríguez-Ferri, E.F.; González-Zorn, B.; Gutiérrez-Martín, C.B. Characterization of a recombinant transferrin-binding protein A (TbpA) fragment from Haemophilus parasuis serovar 5. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010, 307, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, X.; Yu, R.H.; Calmettes, C.; Moraes, T.F.; Schryvers, A.B. Anchor peptide of transferrin-binding protein B is required for interaction with transferrin-binding protein A. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 45165–45173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Curran, D.M.; Adamiak, P.J.; Fegan, J.E.; Qian, C.; Yu, R.h.; Schryvers, A.B. Sequence and structural diversity of transferrin receptors in Gram-negative porcine pathogens. Vaccine 2015, 33, 5700–5707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pogoutse, A.K.; Moraes, T.F. Iron acquisition through the bacterial transferrin receptor. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 52, 314–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Martínez-Martínez, S.; Frandoloso, R.; Rodríguez-Ferri, E.F.; García-Iglesias, M.J.; Pérez-Martínez, C.; Álvarez-Estrada, Á.; Gutiérrez-Martín, C.B. A vaccine based on a mutant transferrin binding protein B of Haemophilus parasuis induces a strong T-helper 2 response and bacterial clearance after experimental infection. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2016, 179, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Frandoloso, R.; Martínez, S.; Rodríguez-Ferri, E.F.; García-Iglesias, M.J.; Pérez-Martínez, C.; Martínez-Fernández, B.; Gutiérrez-Martín, C.B. Development and characterization of protective Haemophilus parasuis subunit vaccines based on native proteins with affinity to porcine transferrin and comparison with other subunit and commercial vaccines. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2011, 18, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Martínez-Martínez, S.; Frandoloso, R.; Ferri, E.F.R.; Gil, C.; Hernández-Haro, C.; Yubero, S.; Martín, C.B.G. Immunoproteomic analysis of the protective response obtained with subunit and commercial vaccines against Glässer’s disease in pigs. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2013, 151, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Martínez-Martínez, S.; Rodríguez-Ferri, E.F.; Frandoloso, R.; Garrido-Pavón, J.J.; Zaldívar-López, S.; Barreiro, C.; Gutiérrez-Martín, C.B. Molecular analysis of lungs from pigs immunized with a mutant transferrin binding protein B-based vaccine and challenged with Haemophilus parasuis. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016, 48, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guizzo, J.A.; Chaudhuri, S.; Prigol, S.R.; Yu, R.H.; Dazzi, C.C.; Balbinott, N.; Frandoloso, G.P.; Kreutz, L.C.; Frandoloso, R.; Schryvers, A.B. The amino acid selected for generating mutant TbpB antigens defective in binding transferrin can compromise the in vivo protective capacity. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dellagostin, D.; Klein, R.L.; Giacobbo, I.; Guizzo, J.A.; Dazzi, C.C.; Prigol, S.R.; Martín, C.B.G.; Kreutz, L.C.; Schryvers, A.B.; Frandoloso, R. TbpBY167A-based vaccine is safe in pregnant sows and induces high titers of maternal derived antibodies that reduce Glaesserella parasuis colonization in piglets. Vet. Microbiol. 2023, 276, 109630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. González-Fernández, A.; Mencía-Ares, O.; García-Iglesias, M.J.; Petrocchi-Rilo, M.; Miguélez-Pérez, R.; Perelló-Jiménez, A.; Herencia-Lagunar, E.; Acebes-Fernández, V.; Gutiérrez-Martín, C.B.; Martínez-Martínez, S. TbpB-based oral mucosal vaccine provides heterologous protection against Glässer’s disease caused by different serovars of Spanish field isolates of Glaesserella parasuis. Porc. Health Manag. 2024, 10, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mair, K.H.; Sedlak, C.; Käser, T.; Pasternak, A.; Levast, B.; Gerner, W.; Saalmüller, A.; Summerfield, A.; Gerdts, V.; Wilson, H.L.; et al. The porcine innate immune system: An update. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2014, 45, 321–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Fu, S.; Zhang, M.; Xu, J.; Ou, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Liu, J.; Chen, H.; Bei, W. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of recombinant Haemophilus parasuis SH0165 putative outer membrane proteins. Vaccine 2013, 31, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Duan, Y.; Hao, Y.; Feng, H.; Shu, J.; He, Y. Research progress on Haemophilus parasuis vaccines. Front. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 1492144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Martín de la Fuente, A.J.; Gutiérrez Martín, C.B.; Pérez Martínez, C.; García Iglesias, M.J.; Tejerina, F.; Rodríguez Ferri, E.F. Effect of Different Vaccine Formulations on the Development of Glässer’s Disease Induced in Pigs by Experimental Haemophilus parasuis Infection. J. Comp. Pathol. 2009, 140, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Amano, H.; Shibata, M.; Takahashi, K.; Sasaki, Y. Effects on Endotoxin Pathogenicity in Pigs with Acute Septicemia of Haemophilus parasuis Infection. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 1997, 59, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Frandoloso, R.; Martínez-Martínez, S.; Calmettes, C.; Fegan, J.; Costa, E.; Curran, D.; Yu, R.H.; Gutiérrez-Martín, C.B.; Rodríguez-Ferri, E.F.; Moraes, T.F.; et al. Nonbinding site-directed mutants of transferrin binding protein B exhibit enhanced immunogenicity and protective capabilities. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 1030–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Franzoni, G.; Kurkure, N.V.; Edgar, D.S.; Everett, H.E.; Gerner, W.; Bodman-Smith, K.B.; Crooke, H.R.; Grahama, S.P. Assessment of the phenotype and functionality of porcine CD8 T cell responses following vaccination with live attenuated classical swine fever virus (CSFV) and virulent CSFV challenge. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2013, 20, 1604–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schmidt, S.; Sassu, E.L.; Vatzia, E.; Pierron, A.; Lagler, J.; Mair, K.H.; Stadler, M.; Knecht, C.; Spergser, J.; Dolezal, M.; et al. Vaccination and Infection of Swine with Salmonella Typhimurium Induces a Systemic and Local Multifunctional CD4+ T-Cell Response. Front. Immunol. 2021, 11, 603089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chen, H.; Li, C.; Fang, M.; Zhu, M.; Li, X.; Zhou, R.; Li, K.; Zhao, S. Understanding Haemophilus parasuis infection in porcine spleen through a transcriptomics approach. BMC Genom. 2009, 10, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, J.; Xu, C.; Shen, H.; Li, J.; Guo, L.; Cao, G.; Feng, S.; Liao, M. Biofilm formation in Haemophilus parasuis: Relationship with antibiotic resistance, serotype and genetic typing. Res. Vet. Sci. 2014, 97, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Frandoloso, R.; Martínez-Martínez, S.; Yubero, S.; Rodríguez-Ferri, E.F.; Gutiérrez-Martín, C.B. New insights in cellular immune response in colostrum-deprived pigs after immunization with subunit and commercial vaccines against Glässer’s disease. Cell. Immunol. 2012, 277, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Prigol, S.R.; Klein, R.; Chaudhuri, S.; Frandoloso, G.P.; Guizzo, J.A.; Martín, C.B.G.; Schryvers, A.B.; Kreutz, L.C.; Frandoloso, R. TbpBY167A-Based Vaccine Can Protect Pigs against Glässer’s Disease Triggered by Glaesserella parasuis SV7 Expressing TbpB Cluster I. Pathogens 2022, 11, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gerner, W.; Käser, T.; Saalmüller, A. Porcine T lymphocytes and NK cells—An update. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2009, 33, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Le Page, L.; Baldwin, C.L.; Telfer, J.C. γδ T cells in artiodactyls: Focus on swine. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2022, 128, 104334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, L.; Luo, W.; Xiong, R.; Li, H.; Yao, Z.; Zhuo, W.; Zou, G.; Huang, Q.; Zhou, R. A Combinatorial Vaccine Containing Inactivated Bacterin and Subunits Provides Protection Against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae Infection in Mice and Pigs. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 902497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bhilare, K.D.; Jawalagatti, V.; Alam, M.J.; Chen, B.; Kim, B.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.H. Immune response following safer administration of recombinant Salmonella Typhimurium harboring ASFV antigens in pigs. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2023, 259, 110596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Osterloh, A. Vaccination against Bacterial Infections: Challenges, Progress, and New Approaches with a Focus on Intracellular Bacteria. Vaccines 2022, 10, 751. [Google Scholar]
  35. Guo, Z.; Jia, Y.; Huang, C.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, X.; Yin, R.; Guo, Y.; Wang, L.; Yuan, J.; Wang, J.; et al. Immunogenicity and protection against Glaesserella parasuis serotype 13 infection after vaccination with recombinant protein LolA in mice. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2022, 84, 1527–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Braun, R.O.; Python, S.; Summerfield, A. Porcine B cell subset responses to toll-like receptor ligands. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bettin, L.; Darbellay, J.; van Kessel, J.; Dhar, N.; Gerdts, V. Porcine γδ T cells express cytotoxic cell-associated markers and display killing activity but are not selectively cytotoxic against PRRSV- or swIAV-infected macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1434011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Dantzler, K.W.; de la Parte, L.; Jagannathan, P. Emerging role of γδ T cells in vaccine-mediated protection from infectious diseases. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2019, 8, e1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. López-Serrano, S.; Mahmmod, Y.S.; Christensen, D.; Ebensen, T.; Guzmán, C.A.; Rodríguez, F.; Segalés, J.; Aragón, V. Immune responses following neonatal vaccination with conserved F4 fragment of VtaA proteins from virulent Glaesserella parasuis adjuvanted with CAF®01 or CDA. Vaccine X 2023, 14, 100330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gerner, W.; Talker, S.C.; Koinig, H.C.; Sedlak, C.; Mair, K.H.; Saalmüller, A. Phenotypic and functional differentiation of porcine αβ T cells: Current knowledge and available tools. Mol. Immunol. 2015, 66, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, T.; Huang, X.; Shi, B.; Wang, F.; Feng, W.; Yao, M. Regulators of Salmonella-host interaction identified by peripheral blood transcriptome profiling: Roles of TGFB1 and TRP53 in intracellular Salmonella replication in pigs. Vet. Res. 2018, 49, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mean cell counts of PBMC subsets in immunized and non-immunized piglets after the first (A) and second (B) vaccine dose. Bars represent mean + standard deviation (SD) of monocytes (CD3 sIgM CD8α CD172a+), B cells (CD3 sIgM+ CD8α CD172a), T cells (CD3+ sIgM CD8α+/ CD172a), and NK cells (CD3 sIgM CD8α+ CD172a). Independent-samples t-test was applied for statistical analysis. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.001 (***); #, trend (p < 0.1).
Figure 1. Mean cell counts of PBMC subsets in immunized and non-immunized piglets after the first (A) and second (B) vaccine dose. Bars represent mean + standard deviation (SD) of monocytes (CD3 sIgM CD8α CD172a+), B cells (CD3 sIgM+ CD8α CD172a), T cells (CD3+ sIgM CD8α+/ CD172a), and NK cells (CD3 sIgM CD8α+ CD172a). Independent-samples t-test was applied for statistical analysis. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.001 (***); #, trend (p < 0.1).
Vetsci 13 00073 g001
Figure 2. Dynamics of T cell subpopulations in immunized and non-immunized pigs following the first (A) and second (B) vaccine doses. Absolute numbers of five T cell subsets were analyzed by flow cytometry: TCRγδ cells (CD3+ TCRγδ+), CD8+ αβ cells (CD3+ TCRγδ CD8β+), CD4+ naïve cells (CD4+ CD27+ CD8α), CD4+ memory cells (CD4+ CD27 CD8α+) and double-negative αβ cells (CD3+ TCRγδ CD4 CD8β). Data are shown as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) for each group at the indicated time points (after the first and second vaccine doses). p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***).
Figure 2. Dynamics of T cell subpopulations in immunized and non-immunized pigs following the first (A) and second (B) vaccine doses. Absolute numbers of five T cell subsets were analyzed by flow cytometry: TCRγδ cells (CD3+ TCRγδ+), CD8+ αβ cells (CD3+ TCRγδ CD8β+), CD4+ naïve cells (CD4+ CD27+ CD8α), CD4+ memory cells (CD4+ CD27 CD8α+) and double-negative αβ cells (CD3+ TCRγδ CD4 CD8β). Data are shown as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) for each group at the indicated time points (after the first and second vaccine doses). p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***).
Vetsci 13 00073 g002
Figure 3. Post-infection PBMC and T-cell subset analysis. (A,B) Representative gating strategy for the analysis of CD8+ T-cell subpopulations in immunized piglets at 1 and 3 days post-infection (dpi), respectively. Lymphocytes were selected by FSC/SSC profile, followed by single-cell and live-cell discrimination; CD3+ T cells were subsequently analyzed based on CD27 and CD8β expression. Subpopulations are indicated by numbers: 1 = naïve non-CTL (CD3+ CD8α+ CD8β CD27+), 2 = memory non-CTL (CD3+ CD8α+ CD8β CD27), 3 = naïve CTL (CD8β+ CD27+) and 4 = memory CTL (CD8β+ CD27). (C) Mean cell counts of major PBMC subsets (monocytes, NK cells, B cells and T cells) in immunized and non-immunized pigs at 1 and 3 dpi. Bars represent group means (n = 5 at 1 dpi; n = 5 immunized and n = 2 non-immunized at 3 dpi); no significant differences were detected between immunized and non-immunized animals at either time point. (D) Mean cell counts of CD4+ naïve, CD4+ memory, naïve and memory CTL, and naïve and memory non-CTL T-cell subpopulations in immunized and non-immunized pigs at 1 and 3 dpi. Because only two non-immunized pigs remained at 3 dpi, data for this group are shown descriptively and statistical analyses were restricted to paired comparisons within the immunized animals.
Figure 3. Post-infection PBMC and T-cell subset analysis. (A,B) Representative gating strategy for the analysis of CD8+ T-cell subpopulations in immunized piglets at 1 and 3 days post-infection (dpi), respectively. Lymphocytes were selected by FSC/SSC profile, followed by single-cell and live-cell discrimination; CD3+ T cells were subsequently analyzed based on CD27 and CD8β expression. Subpopulations are indicated by numbers: 1 = naïve non-CTL (CD3+ CD8α+ CD8β CD27+), 2 = memory non-CTL (CD3+ CD8α+ CD8β CD27), 3 = naïve CTL (CD8β+ CD27+) and 4 = memory CTL (CD8β+ CD27). (C) Mean cell counts of major PBMC subsets (monocytes, NK cells, B cells and T cells) in immunized and non-immunized pigs at 1 and 3 dpi. Bars represent group means (n = 5 at 1 dpi; n = 5 immunized and n = 2 non-immunized at 3 dpi); no significant differences were detected between immunized and non-immunized animals at either time point. (D) Mean cell counts of CD4+ naïve, CD4+ memory, naïve and memory CTL, and naïve and memory non-CTL T-cell subpopulations in immunized and non-immunized pigs at 1 and 3 dpi. Because only two non-immunized pigs remained at 3 dpi, data for this group are shown descriptively and statistical analyses were restricted to paired comparisons within the immunized animals.
Vetsci 13 00073 g003
Table 1. Immunostaining panels used in this study.
Table 1. Immunostaining panels used in this study.
Primary Murine Monoclonal Antibody SpecificityCloneSecondary Antibody Specificity Fluorochrome
(Dilution, Source)
Panel I: Major leukocyte subsets, prior to experimental infection, first and second vaccine doses
sIgMIgG15C9IgG1PE (1/100, SB)
CD8αIgG2a76-2-11IgG2aPECy7 (1/200, SB)
CD172aIgG2b74-22-15aIgG2bAPC (1/2000, SB)
CD3IgG2b-biotinBB23-8E6IgG2bStrAv-BV421 (1/300, BDB)
Panel II: T cell subsets, prior to experimental infection, first and second vaccine doses
First combination
γδTCRIgG1PGB22AIgG1PE (1/100, SB)
CD8αIgG2a76-2-11IgG2aPECy7 (1/200, SB)
CD4IgG2b74-12-4IgG2bAPC (1/2000, SB)
CD3IgG2b-biotinBB23-8E6IgG2bStrAv-BV421 (1/300, BDB)
Second combination
γδTCRIgG1PGB22AIgG1PE (1/100, SB)
CD8βIgG2aPG164AIgG2aPECy7 (1/200, SB)
CD4IgG2b74-12-4IgG2bAPC (1/2000, SB)
CD3IgG2b-biotinBB23-8E6IgG2bStrAv-BV421 (1/300, BDB)
Third combination
CD27IgG1b30c7IgG1PE (1/100, SB)
CD8αIgG2a76-2-11IgG2aPECy7 (1/200, SB)
CD4IgG2b74-12-4IgG2bAPC (1/2000, SB)
CD3IgG2b-biotinBB23-8E6IgG2bStrAv-BV421 (1/300, BDB)
Panel III: Major leukocyte subsets and T cell subsets, day 1 and 3 post-infection
First combination
sIgMIgG15C9IgG1PE (1/100, SB)
CD8αIgG2a76-2-11IgG2aPECy7 (1/200, SB)
CD172aIgG2b74-22-15aIgG2bAPC (1/2000, SB)
CD3IgG2b-biotinBB23-8E6IgG2bStrAv-BV421 (1/300, BDB)
Second combination
CD27IgG1b30c7IgG1PE (1/100, SB)
CD8αIgG2a76-2-11IgG2aPECy7 (1/200, SB)
CD4IgG2b74-12-4IgG2bAPC (1/2000, SB)
CD3IgG2b-biotinBB23-8E6IgG2bStrAv-BV421 (1/300, BDB)
Third combination
CD27IgG1b30c7IgG1PE (1/100, SB)
CD8βIgG2aPG164AIgG2aPECy7 (1/200, SB)
CD4IgG2b74-12-4IgG2bAPC (1/2000, SB)
CD3IgG2b-biotinBB23-8E6IgG2bStrAv-BV421 (1/300, BDB)
Table 2. Characterization of lymphocyte subpopulations analyzed at different experimental time points.
Table 2. Characterization of lymphocyte subpopulations analyzed at different experimental time points.
PanelTime PointsSubpopulation DescriptionLymphocyte Subpopulation
(Phenotype Marker)
IPre-infection, post first and second vaccine dosesMajor leukocyte subsetsMonocytes (CD3 sIgM CD8α CD172a+)
B cells (CD3 sIgM+ CD8α CD172a)
T cells (CD3+ sIgM CD8α+/ CD172a)
NK cells (CD3 sIgM CD8α+ CD172a)
IIPre-infection, post first and second vaccine dosesT cell subsetsTCRγδ (CD3+ TCRγδ+)
CD8+ αβ (CD3+ TCRγδ CD8β+)
CD4+ naïve (CD4+ CD27+ CD8α)
CD4+ memory (CD4+ CD27 CD8α+)
Double-negative αβ (CD3+ TCRγδ CD4 CD8β)
III1 and 3 dpiMajor leukocyte subsets and T cell subsetsMonocytes (CD3 sIgM CD8α CD172a+)
B cells (CD3 sIgM+ CD8α CD172a)
T cells (CD3+ sIgM CD8α+/ CD172a)
NK cells (CD3 sIgM CD8α+ CD172a)
CD4+ naïve (CD4+ CD27+ CD8α)
CD4+ memory (CD4+ CD27 CD8α+)
Naïve CTL (CD8β+ CD27+)
Memory CTL (CD8β+ CD27)
Naïve non-CTL (CD3+ CD8α+ CD8β CD27+)
Memory non-CTL (CD3+ CD8α+ CD8β CD27)
dpi: days post-infection; NK: Natural Killer; CTL: cytotoxic T lymphocytes; sIgM: surface immunoglobulin M. Phenotype markers represent combinations of surface markers used for immunophenotyping by flow cytometry. Panels correspond to different stages and immunostainings used to analyze the dynamic immune response across the experiment timeline.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González-Fernández, A.; García-Iglesias, M.J.; Gutiérrez-Martín, C.B.; Mencía-Ares, Ó.; Martínez-Martínez, S. Temporal Dynamics of T Cell Immunity Induced by TbpBY167A Vaccine in Colostrum-Deprived Piglets Challenged with Glaesserella parasuis. Vet. Sci. 2026, 13, 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13010073

AMA Style

González-Fernández A, García-Iglesias MJ, Gutiérrez-Martín CB, Mencía-Ares Ó, Martínez-Martínez S. Temporal Dynamics of T Cell Immunity Induced by TbpBY167A Vaccine in Colostrum-Deprived Piglets Challenged with Glaesserella parasuis. Veterinary Sciences. 2026; 13(1):73. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13010073

Chicago/Turabian Style

González-Fernández, Alba, María José García-Iglesias, César B. Gutiérrez-Martín, Óscar Mencía-Ares, and Sonia Martínez-Martínez. 2026. "Temporal Dynamics of T Cell Immunity Induced by TbpBY167A Vaccine in Colostrum-Deprived Piglets Challenged with Glaesserella parasuis" Veterinary Sciences 13, no. 1: 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13010073

APA Style

González-Fernández, A., García-Iglesias, M. J., Gutiérrez-Martín, C. B., Mencía-Ares, Ó., & Martínez-Martínez, S. (2026). Temporal Dynamics of T Cell Immunity Induced by TbpBY167A Vaccine in Colostrum-Deprived Piglets Challenged with Glaesserella parasuis. Veterinary Sciences, 13(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13010073

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop