Next Article in Journal
A Real-Time Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay for Specific Detection of Lumpy Skin Disease Virus
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Vaccination against Recombinant FSH or LH Receptor Subunits on Gonadal Development and Functioning Male Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Analytical Validation of Two Assays for Equine Ceruloplasmin Ferroxidase Activity Assessment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cocaine Effects on Reproductive Behavior and Fertility: An Overview
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Ovarian Dynamics and Changes in Estradiol-17β and Progesterone Relationship with Standing Estrus, Preovulatory Follicles, and Ovulation Using Single Prostaglandin F2α Injection in Barbari Goats

Vet. Sci. 2023, 10(10), 624; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10100624
by Tariq Sohail 1,2, Muhammad Farhab 3, Liuming Zhang 1, Yan Kang 1, Xiaomei Sun 1, Dejun Ji 1 and Yongjun Li 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Vet. Sci. 2023, 10(10), 624; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10100624
Submission received: 21 August 2023 / Revised: 21 September 2023 / Accepted: 21 September 2023 / Published: 19 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanisms of Reproductive Control in the Animals)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Do you know the age of the goats? Is the number of lambings prior to the experience of the goats known?

You should improve the presentation of the graphs, which right now are low quality images.

Repetitions are needed to have more reliable conclusions.

 

Author Response

Response to Reviewer .

Please see the attachment below.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references?

Ref. 8 – report, convert to publication if possible

Ref. 9 - the publication refers to cattle, the text suggests that the cited publication refers to goats. Please add that the publication concerns cattle or change the reference.

Ref. 14 - applies only to goats, does not apply to cattle - complete the citation with cattle.

 

Is the research design appropriate?

The authors describe a narrow aspect of reproductive physiology or biotechnology in one breed of goat. The research was performed on a small population of 19 animals, additionally divided into 3 groups. Does such a low number justify the description of the entire breed? What methods were used to make the results on small groups reliable for the reader?

 

Are the conclusions supported by the results?

The conclusions presented in the summary and conclusions section are different and not related to each other. The conclusions contained in the conclusions section are only partially supported by the results and are poorly related to the content of the article. The conclusions are not a summary of research and results, but the authors' guesses and assumptions. They definitely need a major change!!!

 

The text is well written and understandable. Did the authors perform language proofreading with a certificate? In my opinion, the text requires minor linguistic corrections, please have it proofread, e.g. by a native speaker.

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 2.

Please see the attachment below.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop