Next Article in Journal
Application of Elicitors, as Conventional and Nano Forms, in Viticulture: Effects on Phenolic, Aromatic and Nitrogen Composition of Tempranillo Wines
Previous Article in Journal
Nutritional Parameters in Colostrum of Different Mammalian Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fermentation of the Cucurbita ficifolia Fruit Juice: Its Antioxidant Activity and Effects on the Glycemia

by
Nayeli Barrón-Álvarez
1,
Lilia Arely Prado-Barragán
2,
María de los Ángeles Fortis-Barrera
3 and
Francisco Javier Alarcon-Aguilar
3,*
1
Doctorate Program in Biological and Health Sciences DCBS, Metropolitan Autonomous University of Iztapalapa (UAM-I), Mexico City 09340, Mexico
2
Solid Medium Fermentation Pilot Plant, Biotechnology Department DCBS, UAM-I, San Rafael Atlixco No. 186, Col. Vicentina, Mexico City 09340, Mexico
3
Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of Health Sciences DCBS, UAM-I, San Rafael Atlixco No. 186, Col. Vicentina, Mexico City 09340, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Beverages 2022, 8(3), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages8030055
Submission received: 13 August 2022 / Revised: 28 August 2022 / Accepted: 29 August 2022 / Published: 7 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Processing and Nutrition of Fruit and Vegetable Juice)

Abstract

:
Cucurbita ficifolia is an edible plant whose fruits have hypoglycemic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant activities. Fermentation might improve these properties. This research aims to perform and characterize its fermentation in native and induced conditions with Lactobacillus plantarum (Lp) and evaluate its antioxidant activity and effect on glycemia. Fresh juice from mature fruits was characterized. One portion of this juice was spontaneously left to ferment (native fermentation), and the other was inoculated with Lp (controlled fermentation). Fermentation was monitored each 8 h by 56 h to measure microbial growth, pH, acidity, sugars, soluble protein, polyphenols and flavonoids, antioxidant activity, and effects on glycemia. In native fermentation, the growth of total microorganisms increased up to 32 h, decreasing at the end of the process. In Lp fermentation, total microorganisms increased until 16 h to stay constant at the end, with a predominance of Lp. The pH and the sugars decreased in the two fermentations, while polyphenol and flavonoid increased. In spontaneous fermentation, these changes were lesser. Both fermentations, like fresh juice, preserve functional properties (antioxidant, alpha-glucosidase inhibition, and hypoglycemia). The fermentation of this juice with Lp may develop functional beverages, which is significant due to its consumption as an edible fruit with medicinal properties.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cucurbita ficifolia (C. ficifolia), a plant known for its edible fruits, has been associated with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities and hypoglycemic effects [1,2]. Several fruit compounds were proposed as responsible for these biological activities, such as phenols, phytosterols, and D-chiro-inositol [3,4]. Therefore, the preparation of functional products from these fruits may be significant due to their consumption and proven medicinal properties.
The development of non-dairy fermented beverages from fruits with beneficial effects on health has increased, resulting in nutritious products and adjuvants in disease treatment [5,6]. Fruits of several plants have been used to produce fermented beverages, observing qualitative and quantitative modifications in the content of some of their components, especially polyphenols. Therefore, fermentation processes may impact many of the plants’ previously reported biological activities [7,8].
Several chemical transformations occur during fermentation, either spontaneously or under controlled conditions. These transformations modify qualitative and quantitatively nutritional compounds and the secondary metabolites in many fruits, impacting in their functional properties and organoleptic characteristics [9]. The controlled fermentation with lactic acid bacteria (LAB) has been a good process in developing functional beverages [10]. Primarily using Lactobacillus plantarum (Lp), a probiotic strain that hydrolyses phenolic compounds, modifying the composition and properties of the raw material [11].
C. ficifolia contains bioactive polyphenolic compounds with demonstrated antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-diabetic activities. It represents a potential platform for developing new functional products, with a high possibility of being used as adjuvants in treating diabetes mellitus (DM). Considering that it has not been yet explored acid fermentation of C. ficifolia, this research aims to characterize the fermentation of the C. ficifolia fruit juice in two conditions: spontaneously (native) and inoculating with Lp (controlled) and evaluate their antioxidant and hypoglycemic effects.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Physical Characterization of C. ficifolia Fruits and Juice Obtention

After harvesting in October 2019 at Ixtapaluca, Estado de Mexico, Mexico, the fruits were washed and weighed, measuring the longitudinal (LP) and equatorial (EP) perimeters and the sphericity coefficient ε (ε = EP/LP) [12]. The shell and seeds were removed, and the juice was obtained from the mesocarp with an electrical processor and filtered.

2.2. Fermentations of the C. ficifolia Juice: Native and Controlled

In native fermentation, the juice filtered was left spontaneously to ferment at 30 °C for 56 h. In the controlled fermentation, the strain of Lp was cultured in the broth Man Rogosa Sharp (MRS) (Difco®, Detroit, MI, USA) at 30 °C. After 24 h, 10 mL were transferred to sterile MRS broth and incubated at 30 °C until it reached an absorbance of 1.0 at 600 nm. Then, the juice was inoculated with Lp 5% (v/v) and incubated at 30 °C for 56 h. Samples of 30 mL of both fermentations were withdrawn every 8 h under aseptic conditions. All samples were filtered and frozen until further analysis.

2.3. Microbial Growth Determination

Since the fruit has microorganisms such as LAB and yeasts, the microbial growth was monitored each 8 h for 56 h. MRS agar was used for total LAB; a potato dextrose agar (PDA) was used (Becton Dickinson BioxonTM, Mexico City, Mexico) for total yeast and fungi, whereas for total mesophilic microorganisms, a plate count agar was used (PCA, Becton Dickinson BioxonTM, Mexico). In sterile NaCl (0.9% w/v) solution, the previously diluted samples were inoculated (5 µL) and incubated at 30 °C until the colonies’ differentiation. Colonies’ count was expressed as log CFU (colony forming units)/mL. Specific growth rate, µ (h1), was determined using the linear equation of the exponential growth (Equation (1)); in addition, Gompertz’s predictive model was used (Equation (2)) [13]:
Ln Xi = (0.693 t/td) + Ln X0
where Ln Xi = natural log of the cellular concentration at time “i”; t = time; td = time of duplication; Ln X0 = natural log of the cellular concentration at time “cero”.
Log N(t) = A × exp (−exp (B − M × t)
where Log N = common log of bacterial populations (CUF/mL); t = time of incubation (h); A = common log of the initial bacterial populations (CUF/mL) (inoculum); B = growth rate; M = time with the faster growth rate.

2.4. Determination of pH, Total Titratable Acidity (TTA), and °Brix

The pH was measured (HANNA, Instruments®, Woonsocket, RI, USA), and TTA (%) determined (Equation (3)) [14]. Samples (5 mL) were titrated with NaOH 0.1 N up to reach pH 7.0; the milliequivalents (mEq) of malic (0.067) and lactic (0.09) acids were used to determine TTA (%) in the fresh and fermented juices, respectively.
% Acidity = [(VolNaOH (mL) × NNaOH × mEq predominant acid)/mL juice] × 100
where TTA = total titratable acidity; VolNaOH = NaOH (mL); N = normality acid mEq
Total soluble sugars expressed as °Brix were determined with a hand refractometer (PCE Instruments-0018, Southampton, UK) at room temperature (T = 24–28 °C).

2.5. Determination of Soluble Protein and Reducing Sugars

Reducing sugars were determined using the dinitro salicylic acid (DNS) method. A standard curve of bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA) from a 1 mg/mL stock solution was prepared, measuring absorbance at 595 nm (UV–VIS Spectrophotometer, PerkinElmer®, Waltham, MA, USA) [15]. Results were expressed as mg/mL of soluble protein [16]. A standard curve of glucose (Sigma-Aldrich®, USA) from a 1 mg/mL stock solution was prepared, measuring absorbance at 540 nm. The results were expressed in mg/mL of glucose.

2.6. Determination of Total Polyphenols and Flavonoids

Polyphenols were determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu method [17]. Folin reagent (750 µL) (Sigma-Aldrich®, USA) (1:10) and 100 µL of the sample were mixed and left in the darkness for 5 min at room temperature (26 °C ± 2 °C). After, 750 µL of Na2CO3 (6%, J.K. Baker®, San Bernardino, CA, USA) was added and incubated in the dark for 90 min at room temperature (26 °C ± 2). The absorbance was measured at 765 nm. A standard curve of gallic acid (Sigma-Aldrich®, USA) from 0.350 mg/mL stock solution was prepared. The results were expressed as gallic acid (mg EqGA/mL).
In the case of total flavonoids, 300 µL of sample and 90 µL of NaNO2 (5%, Merk®, Darmstadt, Germany) were mixed and incubated in the dark for 5 min at room temperature (26 °C ± 2). Then, 180 µL of AlCl3 (10%, Meyer®, Mexico City, Mexico) were added and left in the dark for 5 min at room temperature (T = 24–28 °C); NaOH (600 µL, 1 M, J.T. Baker®) was added, and the absorbance immediately measured at 510 nm. A standard curve of quercetin (Sigma-Aldrich®, USA) from 0.200 mg/mL stock solution was prepared. Results were expressed as quercetin equivalents mg/mL (mg EqQ/mL) [18].

2.7. Determination of Antioxidant Activity by ABTS and DPPH Radical Scavenging Activities

Radical ABTS (2.2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzotizolin-6-sulfonic) was generated from the 7 mM ABTS solution and 2.45 mM potassium persulfate left in the dark for 16 h at 4 °C. Then, the ABTS reagent was diluted with distilled water to give an absorbance value of 0.7 ± 0.01 at 734 nm; the sample (50 µL) was mixed with 1950 µL of ABTS and incubated in the dark for 10 min at room temperature (T = 24–28 °C), and absorbance was measured at 734 nm. The percentage (%) of inhibition was calculated with Equation (4) [19].
% Inhibition = [(Abs T0 − Abs T10 min)/Abs T0] × 100
where T0 = absorbance at time zero; T10 min = absorbance after 10 min reaction.
A solution of 0.1 mM of the radical DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazine) was dissolved in methanol; the sample (50 µL) was mixed with 1950 µL of DPPH and left in the dark for 30 min at room temperature (26 ± 2 °C). The absorbance was measured at 517 nm. The percentage (%) of inhibition was calculated in Equation (5) [20].
% Inhibition = [(X2 × 100)/X1] − 100
where X1 = initial value (t = 0, unfermented juice); X2 = final value (fermented juice).

2.8. Alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitory In Vitro Assay

The juice of the C. ficifolia and samples at 48 h of fermentation (native and controlled) were subjected to an alpha glucosidase inhibitory in vitro assay. A p-nitrophenyl-α-d-glucopyranoside (pNPG) solution was prepared with phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 6.9). A total of 50 µL of α-glucosidase (1 U/mL) was preincubated with the juice of C. ficifolia and the native and controlled fermentations (50 µL of each) for 10 min. Then, 50 µL of both solutions were mixed and incubated at 37 °C for 5 min. The α-glucosidase activity was determined by measuring the absorbance at 405 nm (UV–VIS spectrometer, PerkinElmer®) and compared with pNPG solution. The percentage of inhibition was calculated with Equation (6).
% Inibition = [(ControlAbsorbance − SampleAbsorbance)/ControlAbsorbance] × 100

2.9. Effects on the Glycemia of the Juice and Samples at the 48 h of Native and Controlled Fermentation

Fasted (12 h) normal male CD-1 mice of six-month-old provided by the Metropolitan Autonomous University Center, maintained with essential rodent diet, and cycles of 12 h light /darkness, were used. The juice of the C. ficifolia and samples at 48 h of fermentation (native and controlled) were also assayed in glycemic and glucose tolerance tests in normal mice. These studies were performed following the national and international standards of the Mexican Official Standard (NOM-062-ZOO-1991, revised 2001, Mexico). Metropolitan Autonomous University Ethic Committee approved this protocol on 31 January 2019 (DCBS.1857.2019).
In glycemic tests, fasted mice were grouped (n = 5): Group 1 received isotonic saline solution (ISS) as control (4 mL/kg); Group 2 glibenclamide (10 mg/kg); Group 4 juice of C. ficifolia; Groups 5 and 6 native fermented juice (25 and 50 mg/kg, respectively); Groups 7 and 8 controlled fermented juice (25 and 50 mg/kg, respectively). All the treatments were diluted in 4 mL/kg body weight of ISS and were administered per os. Glycemia was determined in tail vein blood samples by a puncture at the beginning (t = 0), 120, 240, and 360 min after administering the treatments. Glycemia was quantified by the dehydrogenase method (Accu-Chek, Performa, Roche, Mannheim, Germany).
In the glucose tolerance tests, fasted mice were grouped and received per os a 50% glucose solution (2 g/kg): Group 1 received isotonic saline solution (ISS) as control (4 mL/kg); Group 2 metformin (150 mg/kg); Group 3 juice of C. ficifolia (50 mg/kg); Groups 4 native fermented juice (50 mg/kg); Groups 5 controlled fermented juice (50 mg/kg). All the treatments were diluted in ISS (4 mL/kg) of and per os administered immediately after the administration of the glucose solution. Glycemia was determined by puncture of tail vein blood samples of the animals, which were obtained at the beginning (t = 0), 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after other administration of the treatments. Glycemia was quantified by the dehydrogenase method (Accu-Chek, Performa, Roche, Mannheim, Germany).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the NCSS software (NCSS® Inc., LLC, USA). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc tests were used to evaluate differences (p < 0.05). Assays were performed triplicated, and results were expressed as mean ± S.D.

3. Results

3.1. Physical Characteristics of C. ficifolia Fruits

Figure 1 shows the sizes of the fruits and seeds of C. ficifolia. Other physical attributes of C. ficifolia fruits, including their weight, are shown in Table 1. Considering the sphericity coefficient ε, where 1.0 corresponds to a spherical shape, and lower values to an oval, the fruits used in this study had an oval shape and an average weight of almost 4.5 kg. The seeds were black with an average weight of 136.7 ± 35.1 g. The fiber content in the fruit was 12.2% (Table 1).

3.2. Microbial Growth in Native and Controlled Fermentation of the C. ficifolia Juice

Figure 2 shows the microbial profile of the native fermentation (A) and controlled (B) of C. ficifolia juice for 56 h. Predominant native microbiota in the juice (t = 0): In LAB (MRS) was 12 ± 0.7 Log CFU/mL, followed by mesophiles (PCA) with 8 ± 0.01 Log CFU/mL, and fungi and yeast (PDA) 5 ± 1.4 Log CFU/mL. Figure 2A shows the microbial growth of the native fermentation. In this fermentation, the exponential growth of the LAB (MRS) was observed from 8 to 32 h (21 ± 2.0 Log CFU/mL) without reaching a stable phase, with a reduction in initial values at the end (56 h). Mesophiles exhibited an exponential growth from 0 to 8 h, with a maximal increase of 18 ± 2.0 CFU/mL, and gradually fell to the end (56 h). Fungi and yeast maximal microbial count was 25 ± 2.0 CFU/mL (32 h).
Figure 2B shows the microbial growth of induced lactic fermentation, reaching the maximal growth (27 ± 2.1 log CFU/mL) at 24 h; then, the LAB count decreased to 23 ± 1.0 log CFU/mL (56 h). In PDA, the highest growth occurred at 16 h (15.5 ± 2.1 Log CFU/mL), followed by a decrease at the end (12 ± 2.8 Log CFU/mL). The maximal microbial concentration observed in PCA was at 32 h (14.5 ± 4.1 Log CFU/mL), then reduced to 10 ± 0.1 log CFU/mL at the end (Figure 2B). Table 2 shows the kinetics parameters in the fermented juice of C. ficifolia with the two systems. Faster growth was observed in controlled fermentation in MRS medium, which accounts for LAB. While in native fermentation, yeast and fungi grew faster in the PDA medium. The results of the predictive Gompertz’s model showed that LAB microorganisms grew faster than yeast and fungi. The Lp growth shown by the model was the only one that matched well with the growth calculated experimentally (Table 3).

3.3. pH and TTA Profile

Figure 3 shows the temporal course of pH (A) and % TTA (B) of the native and controlled fermentation of the C. ficifolia juice for 56 h. In the controlled fermentation with Lp, a drop from pH 5.4 ± 0.2 was observed at 16 h to 4.1 ± 0.04; then, the pH value remained practically constant until 56 h. In native fermentation, the reduction in pH value was less in the controlled conditions, oscillating from 5.4 to 5.0 by the end. Concerning TTA in controlled conditions (Figure 3B), the initial value was 0.09 ± 0.02%, reaching a maximum of 0.91 ± 01% at 40 h and decreasing to 0.76 ± 0.07% at 56 h. One more time, in native fermentation, the values of TTA were lower than in controlled conditions, with a maximum acidity value reaching 0.4 ± 0.01%.

3.4. Profile of Reducing Sugars and Soluble Protein

Figure 4 shows the temporal course of reducing sugars (A), protein (B), total polyphenols (C), and total flavonoids (D) of native and controlled fermentation of the C. ficifolia juice for 56 h. Initially, t = 0, reducing sugars were 2.4 ± 0.19. In the lactic fermentation, reducing sugars decreased 64% at 16 h and 77.5% at the fermentation ends, which also happened with the native fermentation. The protein content (Figure 4B) in the juice (t = 0) was 0.47 ± 0.05 mg/mL, reducing 79% until 40 h in the case of the controlled fermentation; at 56 h, it increased 12.7% from the initial value. In the native fermentation, the profile was similar, although the fluctuations were lesser than in controlled conditions.

3.5. Polyphenols and Flavonoids

The content of polyphenols and flavonoids in the juice was 0.44 ± 0.01 mg EqGA/mL and 0.07 ± 0.003 mg EqQ/mL, respectively (Figure 4C,D). Polyphenols increased during the controlled fermentation, reaching 44.8% higher than the initial value. The quantity decreased to 0.50 ± 0.01 mg EqGA/mL, 13.1% over the initial value. At 48 h, flavonoids increased 514%, and finally, the increase was 388.3% over the initial value. In native fermentation, polyphenols were reduced compared with the controlled fermentation, staying practically constant until 56 h. However, flavonoids were increased in native fermentation, although values were lesser than in controlled conditions.

3.6. In Vitro Antioxidant Activity of Native and Controlled Fermentations

Figure 5 shows the temporal course of the inhibition of DPPH (A) and ABTS (B) radicals during native and controlled fermentation of the C. ficifolia juice for 56 h. The juice exhibited percentages of the inhibition of DPPH (Figure 5A) and ABTS (Figure 5B) of 43.3 ± 1.4% and 86.5 ± 1.2%, respectively. With DPPH, inhibition did not change during the fermentation. ABTS inhibition decreased by 24% at 56 h, compared with the inhibition observed in the unfermented juice. In the case of native fermentation, the antioxidant activity did not change significantly in any of the assays.

3.7. Comparative Analysis at 48 h of the Native and Controlled Fermentations against the C. ficifolia Juice (t = 0)

In fermented juice with LAB, the exponential growth at 48 h reached a terminal stationary phase with 27 ± 2.1 log CFU/mL (Figure 2B) and a high content of flavonoids (0.44 ± 0.02 mg EqQ/mL) (Figure 4D). Therefore, values at 48 h were used to compare fermented juices (Table 4). At this time, the controlled fermentation decreased the pH, reducing sugars and proteins. In contrast, TTA, polyphenols, and flavonoids increased (800%, 38.6%, and 528%, respectively). DPPH did not change significantly, whereas inhibition of ABTS decreased by 17.4%. In the case of native fermentation, the reductions in pH and reducing sugars were lesser than in controlled fermentation. The rise in TTA and flavonoids also was less than in controlled fermentation. In native fermentation, reduced polyphenols were observed. Considering these values at 48 h, in this time were evaluated the effects of both fermented products on the in vitro alpha-glucosidase inhibition and the glycemia of fasted normal mice.

3.8. Alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitory Effect and on the Glycemia

Table 5 shows the alpha-glucosidase inhibitory potential evaluated in vitro. There was no significant difference among all the treatments (juice of C. ficifolia and native fermentations). However, the controlled fermentation exhibited the highest inhibitory potential on the enzyme activity, significantly different from juice and native fermentation.
To the effect on the glycemia (Table 6), the results in fasted normal mice, at a dose of 25 mg/kg, none of the treatments showed an effect on the glycemia (Table 6). However, at a dose of 50 mg/kg, except for native fermentation, the juice and the controlled fermentation caused significant reductions in the glycemia compared with the ISS control (p < 0.05): at 360 min, the juice caused a considerable decrease in the glycemia; and at 240 and 360 min the controlled fermentation. The reductions caused by glibenclamide at any time were higher than the other treatments (p < 0.05). In the oral glucose tolerance test (Table 6), excepting native fermentation, all treatments caused significant reductions of the hyperglycemic peak at 30 min, compared with ISS control (p < 0.05). At 60 min, all treatments caused significant reductions in glycemia compared with ISS control (p < 0.05). The reductions caused by metformin (positive control) at any time were higher than the other treatments (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

In the present study, mature fruits were used and characterized by their oval shape, mottled green color, hard shell, and black seeds, similar characteristics previously reported [21]. The fiber content was high (12.2%) compared with other Cucurbitaceae fruits, whereas the C. ficifolia juice yield (45%) was similar [22,23]. The microbiological profile of the juice showed a LAB predominance, followed by the mesophiles, fungi, and yeast, which agrees with apple juice fermentation [24]. The pH was 5.4, whereas the TTA was low compared with other Cucurbitaceae [23]. The reducing sugar content was 2.4 mg/mL, whereas °Brix resulted in 4.1 ± 0.2. These data support the idea that the C. ficifolia juice is a potentially suitable matrix to perform a lactic fermentation with Lp.
Lp is the most widely used strain to produce fermented plant products in controlled conditions. It is usually found in plant products and is considered a probiotic that can survive in stomach conditions, inhibiting the growth of Escherichia coli and Helicobacter pylori [25]. Lp is one of the most used microorganisms in non-dairy fermentations with a high capacity to metabolize substrates, which induces changes in chemical composition, impacting the nutritional quality. The MRS selective medium for Lp growth was used in the present study, increasing similarly to the observed with other Cucurbitaceae juices [26,27]. The microbial growth in the non-fermented and fermented C. ficifolia juices corresponds well with other fermented juices, with a predominance of LAB [28].
In contrast, in the native fermentation, the predominant microorganisms were fungi, yeast, and LAB, followed by the mesophiles, all exhibiting an erratic growth that never reached a steady phase. The results of the predictive Gompertz’s model, a mathematical model used to estimate the growth of different Lactobacillus strains on various substrates, describe the kinetics of growth of these microorganisms under controlled conditions to produce specific metabolites [13], showed that LAB grew faster than yeast and fungi. The Lp growth demonstrated by the model was the only one that matched well with the change calculated experimentally.
In the controlled fermented juice, the pH decreased, and the TTA increased, correlating well with glucose consumption from the medium by the microorganisms. Several reports indicate decreased pH during the lactic fermentation of fruit juices in the Cucurbitaceae family [29,30]. Lactic acid production and pH reduction during food fermentation can cause inhibition of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogen microorganisms [31,32]. Thus, reducing the growth of potential noxious microbiota, probably by increasing the lactic acid production during fermentation, contributing to carbohydrate hydrolysis. Since the values observed in these parameters for the native fermentation were clearly of a lesser scale, this might stimulate the growth of pathogen microorganisms. In further studies, the characterization of the specific strains of microorganisms in both fermented juices will be mandatory.
The reducing sugars are used as a primary source of carbon by Lp. They were diminished during the fermentation [33,34], as observed with both fermentations, which is relevant because beverages with low caloric content have a great demand as treatments for DM [35,36]. Although different types of fermented non-dairy beverages have been reported with hypoglycemic activity [36,37], the effect on glycemia of C. ficifolia fermented fruit has not yet been explored. The present investigation studied this effect in fasted normal mice and glucose oral tolerance tests in mice. In both models, the juice, and samples at 48 h of the fermented products exhibited significant reductions in the glycemia, as the controlled fermentation preserves the effect on the glycemia for the juice without fermentation and those previously reported for the juice in normal and diabetic mice [1,4,12].
The soluble protein in the C. ficifolia juice was decreased during the fermentation, necessary components for the growth of microorganisms, resulting in the modification of flavor due to transamination reactions. However, in the end, the protein content was like the initial values. Fermentation has been used to improve the protein nutrition quality in several products, facilitating the metabolic activity of the microorganisms, mobilizing the proteins, releasing proteolytic enzyme activities, and reducing the macromolecular complexes into simple amino acids [38,39,40]. These processes might explain the fluctuations in protein content in both fermentations of C. ficifolia.
C. ficifolia exhibited similar content of polyphenols and flavonoids to C. pepo, values lower than other Cucurbitaceae species [23]. During the controlled fermentation of C. ficifolia juice, the polyphenols were increased at 40 h. Lp contributes to enzymatic depolymerization of high molecular weight polyphenols to free polyphenols by carboxylases and tanases, improving the polyphenol content [41]. Contrarily, the polyphenols during all the native fermentation were observed reduced, reaching their lowest value at 48 h of the fermentation.
Polyphenols are associated with multiple beneficial effects [42]. C. ficifolia juice is rich in simple phenolic compounds, such as gallic acid, p-coumaric acid, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid, which significantly contribute to antioxidant activity [4]. Nevertheless, both fermentations did not modify DPPH compared to unfermented juice, remaining around 40% of inhibition, preserving the antioxidant activity. In contrast, a decrease in ABTS radical inhibition was observed at the end of both fermentations, probably due to the quantitative and qualitative changes in flavonoids [43]. In addition, the loss of antioxidant activity might be due to polyphenols’ changes during fermentation, decreasing the original components [44,45]. Since antioxidant activity has not been reported in vitro in C. ficifolia, these data contribute to the knowledge of this fruit. Additionally, the fruit’s fermentation probably does not alter the antioxidant activity reported in vivo [46]. However, this should be confirmed in further studies.
Polyphenols also have been attributed to the inhibitory activity of carbohydrate hydrolytic enzymes, reducing the absorption of simple sugars at the bowel level, which may be helpful in DM [47]. The present work evaluated the in vitro inhibitory effect potential on alpha-glucosidase. The different treatments exhibited a similar effect on inhibiting the enzyme, which might explain the antihyperglycemic effect observed in the glucose tolerance test. In addition, the product of the controlled fermentation also significantly reduced glycemia in fasted normal mice. These observed effects match previous studies in our laboratory with the juice, including diabetic experimental models [1,4,46]. In these studies, some compounds from the fruit were proposed as hypoglycemic agents, such as D-chiro inositol and chlorogenic acid [3,48], with potential utility in DM control. However, with the data until now, does not possible to know if these compounds remain in the fermented juices. Therefore, the chemical characterization of both fermented products should be considered in further studies.
Another aspect to consider is associated with the organoleptic properties of the C. ficifolia juice, which is lightly insipid. It is possible that with fermentation, this characteristic can be improved [49]. Finally, considering that the controlled fermentation was observed at 48 h, significant growth of Lp, with high flavonoid and polyphenol contents, and preserved the antioxidant activity, this period may be enough to stop the fermentation and generate a suitable product that improves the raw material’s functional properties.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, both fermentations modified the chemical composition of the unfermented juice of C. ficifolia. The data suggest that a controlled fermentation of C. ficifolia by Lp may improve its functional properties, particularly with glycemia; 48 h of fermentation might be sufficient to stop the process. These data can serve as a base for developing functional food with antioxidant properties, low sugar content, and effects on glycemia with possible utility in DM.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.A.P.-B. and F.J.A.-A.; data curation, M.d.l.Á.F.-B. and N.B.-Á.; formal Analysis, L.A.P.-B., F.J.A.-A., M.d.l.Á.F.-B. and N.B.-Á.; investigation, M.d.l.Á.F.-B. and N.B.-Á.; methodology, M.d.l.Á.F.-B. and N.B.-Á.; supervision, L.A.P.-B. and F.J.A.-A.; writing—original draft, L.A.P.-B., F.J.A.-A., M.d.l.Á.F.-B. and N.B.-Á.; writing—review and editing, F.J.A.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

CONACyT supported this work, with scholarship registration 300456/CVU: 477215, to N.B.A. as part of her Ph.D. studies in the Doctorate Program of Health and Biological Sciences at the Autonomous Metropolitan University Iztapalapa. The Special Program Support to the Investigation UAM-2019, partially supported this research. This research was also partially supported by the PRODEP-SEP (UAM-PTC-600).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Metropolitan Autonomous University Ethic Committee (DCBS.1857.2019, 31 January 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alarcon-Aguilar, F.J.; Hernandez-Galicia, E.; Campos-Sepulveda, A.E.; Xolalpa-Molina, S.; Rivas-Vilchis, J.F.; Vazquez-Carrillo, L.I.; Roman-Ramos, R. Evaluation of the hypoglycemic effect of Cucurbita ficifolia Bouche (Cucurbitaceae) in different experimental models. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2002, 82, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fortis-Barrera, A.; Alarcon-Aguilar, F.J.; Banderas-Dorantes, T.; Díaz-Flores, M.; Roman-Ramos, R.; Cruz, M.; García-Macedo, R. Cucurbita ficifolia Bouché (Cucurbitaceae) and D-chiro-inositol modulate the redox state and inflammation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2013, 65, 1563–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Xia, T.; Wang, Q. D-chiro-inositol found in Cucurbita ficifolia (Cucurbitaceae) fruit extracts play the hypoglycaemic role in streptozocin-diabetic rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2006, 58, 1527–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Garcia-Gonzalez, J.; Garcia-Lorenzana, M.; Zamilpa, A.; Almanza-Perez, J.C.; Jasso-Villagomez, E.I.; Roman-Ramos, R.; Alarcon-Aguilar, F.J. Chemical characterization of a hypoglycemic extract from Cucurbita ficifolia Bouche that induces liver glycogen accumulation in diabetic mice. Afr. J. Trad. Comp. Altern. Med. 2017, 14, 218–230. [Google Scholar]
  5. Di Cagno, R.; Filannino, P.; Vincentini, O.; Cantatore, V.; Cavoski, I.; Gobbetti, M. Fermented Portulaca oleracea L. juice: A novel functional beverage with potential ameliorating effects on the intestinal inflammation and epithelial injury. Nutrients 2019, 11, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ankolekar, C.; Johnson, K.; Pinto, M.; Johnson, D.; Labbe, R.G.; Greene, D.; Shetty, K. Fermentation of whole apple juice using Lactobacillus acidophilus for the potential dietary management of hyperglycemia, hypertension, and modulation of beneficial bacterial responses. J. Food Biochem. 2012, 36, 718–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Du, X.; Myracle, A.D. Fermentation alters the bioaccessible phenolic compounds and increases the alpha-glucosidase inhibitory effects of aronioa juice in a dairy matrix following in vitro digestion. R. Soc. Chem. 2018, 9, 2998–3007. [Google Scholar]
  8. Park, E.J.; Garcia, C.V.; Youn, S.J.; Park, C.D.; Lee, S.P. Fortification of γ-aminobutyric acid and bioactive compounds in Cucurbita moschata by novel two-step fermentation using Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus plantarum. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 102, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gao, H.; Wen, J.J.; Hu, J.L.; Nie, Q.X.; Chen, H.H.; Nie, S.P.; Xiong, T.; Xie, M.Y. Momordica charantia juice with Lactobacillus plantarum fermentation: Chemical composition, antioxidant properties and aroma profile. Food Biosci. 2019, 29, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Septembre-Malaterre, A.; Remize, F.; Poucheret, P. Fruits and vegetables, as a source of nutritional compounds and phytochemicals: Changes in bioactive compounds during lactic fermentation. Food Res. Inter. 2018, 104, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gupta, S.; Abu-Ghannam, N. Probiotic fermentation of plant based products: Possibilities and opportunities. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nut. 2012, 52, 183–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Moya-Hernández, A.; Bosquez-Molina, E.; Verde-Calvo, J.R.; Blancas-Flores, G.; Trejo-Aguilar, G.M. Hypoglycemic effect and bioactive compounds associated with the ripening stages of the Cucurbita ficifolia Bouché fruit. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 5171–5181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Valbuena, E.; Barreiro, J.; Sánchez, E.; Castro, G.; Briñez, W.; Tovar, A. Modelos cinéticos aplicados al crecimiento de Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis en leche. Rev. Cient. 2005, 15, 464–475. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ojokoh, A.; Orekoya, E. Effect of fermentation on the proximate composition of the epicarp of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Int. J. Swarm Intel. Evol. Comp. 2017, 5, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Miller, G.L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 1959, 31, 426–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Singleton, V.L.; Orthofer, R.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. In Methods in Enzymology: Oxidants and Antioxidant Part A, 1st ed.; Abelson, J., Simon, M., Sidney, S., Kaplan, P., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambrige, MA, USA, 1998; Volume 299, pp. 152–178. [Google Scholar]
  18. Escudero-López, B.; Cerrillo, I.; Herrero-Martín, G.; Hornero-Méndez, D.; Gil-Izquierdo, A.; Medina, S.; Ferreres, F.; Berná, G.; Martin, F.; Fernández-Pachón, M.S. Fermented orange juice: Source of higher carotenoid and flavanone contents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 8773–8782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kwaw, E.; Ma, Y.; Tchabo, W.; Tibiru, M.; Wu, M.; Sackle, A.; Xiao, L.; Elrasheid, H. Effect of Lactobacillus strains on phenolic profile, color attributes and antioxidant activities of lactic-acid-fermented mulberry juice. Food Chem. 2018, 250, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Saade, R.L. Catálogo de la Familia Cucurbitaceae de México; Final Inform SNIB-CONABIO Proyecto DS002; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: Mexico City, Mexico, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim, M.Y.; Kim, E.J.; Kim, Y.N.; Choi, C.; Lee, B.H. Comparison of the chemical compositions and nutritive values of various pumpkin (Cucurbitaceae) species and parts. Nut. Res. Pract. 2012, 6, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhou, C.L.; Mi, L.; Hu, X.Y.; Zhu, B.H. Evaluation of three pumpkin species: Correlation with physicochemical, antioxidant properties and classification using SPME-GC–MS and E-nose methods. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 54, 3118–3131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dimitrovski, D.; Velickova, E.; Langerholc, T.; Winkelhausen, E. Apple juice as a medium for fermentation by the probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum PCS 26 strain. Ann. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 2161–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saarela, M. Probiotics. Lactobacilli. In Probiotics and Probiotics: Ingredients Handbook, 2nd ed.; Jardine, S., Ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 101–113. [Google Scholar]
  26. Koh, W.Y.; Uthumporn, U.; Rosma, A.; Irfan, A.R.; Park, Y.H. Optimization of a fermented pumpkin-based beverage to improve Lactobacillus mali survival and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity: A response surface methodology approach. Food Sci. Hum. Well. 2018, 7, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Koh, W.Y.; Utra, U.; Rosma, A.; Effarizah, M.E.M.; Rosli, W.I.W.; Park, Y.H. Development of a novel fermented pumpkin-based beverage inoculated with water kefir grains: A response surface methodology approach. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 27, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mousavi, Z.E.; Mousavi, M. The effect of fermentation by Lactobacillus plantarum on the physicochemical and functional properties of liquorice root extract. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 105, 164–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mazlan, F.A.; Annuar, M.S.M.; Sharifuddin, Y. Biotransformation of Momordica charantia fresh juice by Lactobacillus plantarum BET003 and its putative anti-diabetic potential. PeerJ 2015, 3, e1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Roh, H.J.; Kim, G.E. Fermentation of Cucurbita maxima extracts with microorganisms from Kimchi. J. KSBB 2009, 24, 149–155. [Google Scholar]
  31. Filannino, P.; Di Cagno, R.; Trani, A.; Cantatore, V. Lactic acid fermentation enriches the profile of biogenic compounds and enhances the functional features of common purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.). J. Funct. Foods 2017, 39, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Linares-Morales, J.R.; Cuellar-Nevárez, G.E.; Rivera-Chavira, B.E.; Gutiérrez Méndez, N.; Pérez-Vega, S.B.; Nevárez-Moorillón, G.V. Selection of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fresh fruits and vegetables based on their antimicrobial and enzymatic activities. Foods 2020, 9, 1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kaprasob, R.; Kerdchoechuen, O.; Laohakunjit, N.; Sarkar, D. Fermentation-based biotransformation of bioactive phenolics and volatile compounds from cashew apple juice by select lactic acid bacteria. Proc. Biochem. 2017, 59, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mousavi, Z.E.; Mousavi, S.M.; Razavi, S.H.; Emam-Djomeh, Z.; Kiani, H. Fermentation of pomegranate juice by probiotic lactic acid bacteria. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 27, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Garcia, C.; Guérin, M.; Souidi, K.; Remize, F. Lactic fermented fruit or vegetable juices: Past, present and future. Beverages 2020, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shi, M.; Loftus, H.; McAinch, A.J.; Su, X.Q. Blueberry as a source of bioactive compounds for the treatment of obesity, type 2 diabetes and chronic inflammation. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 30, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Venkatakrishnan, K.; Chiu, H.F.; Wang, C.K. Popular functional foods and herbs for the management of type-2-diabetes mellitus: A comprehensive review with special reference to clinical trials and its proposed mechanism. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 57, 425–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Filannino, P.; Cardinali, G.; Rizzello, C.G.; Buchin, S.; De Angelis, M.; Gobbetti, M.; Di Cagno, R. Metabolic responses of Lactobacillus plantarum strains during fermentation and storage of vegetable and fruit juices. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 2206–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Gänzle, M.G. Lactic metabolism revisited: Metabolism of lactic acid bacteria in food fermentations and food spoilage. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 2, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Banwo, K.; Asogwa, F.C.; Ogunremi, O.R.; Adesulu-Dahunsi, A.; Sanni, A. Nutritional profile and antioxidant capacities of fermented millet and sorghum gruels using lactic acid bacteria and yeasts. Food Biotech. 2021, 35, 199–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rodríguez, H.; Curiel, J.A.; Landete, J.M.; de las Rivas, B.; de Felipe, F.L.; Gómez-Cordovés, C.; Mancheño, J.M.; Muñoz, R. Food phenolics and lactic acid bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 132, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fereidon, S.; Priyatharini, A. Phenolics and polyphenolics in foods, beverages and spices: Antioxidant activity and health effects—A review. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 820–897. [Google Scholar]
  43. Shashank, K.; Abhay, K. Review article chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: An overview. Sci. World J. 2013, 4, 32–48. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wu, C.; Li, T.; Qi, J.; Jiang, T.; Xu, H.; Lei, H. Effects of lactic acid fermentation-based biotransformation on phenolic profiles, antioxidant capacity, and flavor volatiles of apple juice. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 122, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Huang, D.; Boxin, O.U.; Prior, R.L. The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1841–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Roman-Ramos, R.; Almanza-Perez, J.C.; Fortis-Barrera, A.; Angeles-Mejia, S.; Banderas-Dorantes, T.R.; Zamilpa-Alvarez, A.; Díaz-Flores, M.; Jasso, I.; Blancas-Flores, G.; Cruz, J.; et al. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of a hypoglycemic fraction from Cucurbita ficifolia Bouché in streptozotocin-induced diabetes mice. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2012, 40, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Anhê, F.F.; Desjardins, Y.; Pilon, G.; Dudonné, S.; Genovese, M.I.; Lajolo, F.M.; Marette, A. Polyphenols and type 2 diabetes: A prospective review. Pharma. Nutr. 2013, 1, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Becerra, S.M.; Miranda, P.E.; Gomez, V.J.C.; Fortis, B.M.A.; Perez, R.J.; Alarcon, A.F.J. Potential of the chlorogenic acid as multitarget agent: Insulin-secretagogue and PPAR α/γ dual agonist. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 94, 169–175. [Google Scholar]
  49. Filannino, P.; Azzi, L.; Cavoski, I.; Vincentini, O.; Rizzello, C.G.; Gobbetti, M.; Di Cagno, R. Exploitation of the health-promoting and sensory properties of organic pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) juice through lactic acid fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2013, 163, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Sizes of the fruits and seeds of C. ficifolia.
Figure 1. Sizes of the fruits and seeds of C. ficifolia.
Beverages 08 00055 g001
Figure 2. Microbial profile of the native fermentation (A) and controlled with Lp (B) of the C. ficifolia juice for 56 h (MRS = Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe, PDA = potato dextrose agar, PCA = standard count agar).
Figure 2. Microbial profile of the native fermentation (A) and controlled with Lp (B) of the C. ficifolia juice for 56 h (MRS = Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe, PDA = potato dextrose agar, PCA = standard count agar).
Beverages 08 00055 g002
Figure 3. Temporal course of pH (A) and % TTA (B) of the native and controlled fermentation (Lp) of the C. ficifolia juice for 56 h. * Significant difference (p < 0.05) against native fermentation juice. T-paired test (Mean ± S.D., n = 3), Tukey’s post hoc test.
Figure 3. Temporal course of pH (A) and % TTA (B) of the native and controlled fermentation (Lp) of the C. ficifolia juice for 56 h. * Significant difference (p < 0.05) against native fermentation juice. T-paired test (Mean ± S.D., n = 3), Tukey’s post hoc test.
Beverages 08 00055 g003
Figure 4. Temporal course of reducing sugars (A), protein (B), total polyphenols (C), and total flavonoids (D) of native and controlled fermentation (Lp) of the C. ficifolia juice for 56 h. * Significant difference (p < 0.05) against native fermentation juice. T-paired test (Mean ± S.D., n = 3), Tukey’s post hoc test.
Figure 4. Temporal course of reducing sugars (A), protein (B), total polyphenols (C), and total flavonoids (D) of native and controlled fermentation (Lp) of the C. ficifolia juice for 56 h. * Significant difference (p < 0.05) against native fermentation juice. T-paired test (Mean ± S.D., n = 3), Tukey’s post hoc test.
Beverages 08 00055 g004
Figure 5. Temporal course of inhibition of DPPH (A) and ABTS (B) radicals during native and controlled fermentation (Lp) of the C. ficifolia juice for 56 h. * Significant difference (p < 0.05) concerning unfermented juice (t = 0). T-paired test (Mean ± S.D., n = 3). Tukey’s post-hoc test.
Figure 5. Temporal course of inhibition of DPPH (A) and ABTS (B) radicals during native and controlled fermentation (Lp) of the C. ficifolia juice for 56 h. * Significant difference (p < 0.05) concerning unfermented juice (t = 0). T-paired test (Mean ± S.D., n = 3). Tukey’s post-hoc test.
Beverages 08 00055 g005
Table 1. Physical characteristics of C. ficifolia fruits and seeds (Mean ± S.D., n = 3).
Table 1. Physical characteristics of C. ficifolia fruits and seeds (Mean ± S.D., n = 3).
CharacteristicsFruitsSeeds
Longitudinal perimeter (LP, cm)68.4 ± 9.71.4 ± 0.1
Equatorial perimeter (EP, cm)56.4 ± 3.70.9 ± 0.1
Sphericity coefficient (ε)0.8 ± 0.1-
Weight (g)4478.3 ± 527.7136.7 ± 35.1
Juice (mL)2025 ± 217-
Yield juice (%)45.2 ± 1.3-
Fiber (g)361.7 ± 114.5-
Yield fiber (%)12.2 ± 2.2-
°Brix4.1 ± 0.2-
Sphericity coefficient ε (ε = EP/LP) and the weight of each fruit were measured. The juice was obtained and filtered to measure the volume, fiber, and °Brix.
Table 2. Kinetic of growth of native and controlled fermentation (L. plantarum) of the C. ficifolia juice at 30 °C (Mean ± S.D., n = 3). Specific growth rate µ (h−1) was determined using the linear equation of the exponential growth.
Table 2. Kinetic of growth of native and controlled fermentation (L. plantarum) of the C. ficifolia juice at 30 °C (Mean ± S.D., n = 3). Specific growth rate µ (h−1) was determined using the linear equation of the exponential growth.
Parameter Value
ControlledNative
Medium MicroorganismsµMµM
MRSL. plantarum0.46 ± 0.010.30 ± 0.300.26 ± 0.1232.94 ± 0.23
PDAYeast and fungi0.25 ± 0.171.77 ± 0.230.30 ± 0.021.24 ± 0.55
PCAMesophilic0.33 ± 0.180.10 ± 0.030.21 ± 0.12.80 ± 1.26
µ: specific growth rate (h−1) M: time in which the rate of growth is highest (h).
Table 3. Kinetic of growth with the Gompertz’s predictive model (Equation (2)) [13] of native and controlled fermentation (L. plantarum) of the C. ficifolia juice (mean ± S.D., n = 3).
Table 3. Kinetic of growth with the Gompertz’s predictive model (Equation (2)) [13] of native and controlled fermentation (L. plantarum) of the C. ficifolia juice (mean ± S.D., n = 3).
NativeControlled
ParameterL. plantarumYeast-FungiMesophilicL. plantarumYeast-FungiMesophilic
A14.19 ± 1.312.80 ± 1.511.57 ± 0.426.07 ± 2.412.69 ± 0.513.15 ± 0.6
B29.08 ± 2.09.55 ± 1.3−1.00 ± 0.10.47 ± 0.513.49 ± 1.9−0.47 ± 0.04
M32.94 ± 0.21.24 ± 0.62.80 ± 1.30.30 ± 0.31.77 ± 0.20.10 ± 0.03
A: logarithm of the initial population. B: growth rate. M: time in which the rate of growth was highest.
Table 4. Comparative between parameters at 48 h of native and lactic fermentation against fresh juice.
Table 4. Comparative between parameters at 48 h of native and lactic fermentation against fresh juice.
AssayFresh Juice
(t = 0)
Native Ferm.
(48 h)
% VariationLactic Ferm.
(48-h)
% Variation
pH5.4 ± 0.14.7 ± 0.018 #−134.1 ± 0.04 *−24.1
TTA (%)0.09 ± 0.010.44 ± 0.03 #+388.90.81 ± 0.07 *+800
Reducing sugars (mg/mL)2.4 ± 0.190.80 ± 0.28 #−66.60.6 ± 0.41 *−75
Protein (mg/mL)0.47 ± 0.050.26 ± 0.04 #−44.70.33 ± 0.02 *−29.8
Polyphenols
(mg EqGA/mL)
0.44 ± 0.010.30 ± 0.01 #−31.80.61 ± 0.01 *+38.6
Total flavonoids
(mg EqQ/mL)
0.07 ± 0.0030.29 ± 0.16 #+3140.44 ± 0.02 *+528
Inhibition DPPH (%)43.3 ± 1.447.91 ± 1.31 #+10.645.29 ± 1.8+4.6
Inhibition ABTS (%)86.5 ± 1.278.25 ± 0.71 #−9.571.43 ± 1.3 *−17.4
#,* Significant difference against fresh juice (p < 0.05). ANOVA one-way test (mean ± S.D.; n = 3). Tukey’s post hoc test. + Increase; − decrease.
Table 5. In vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory effect (%) of the juice of C. ficifolia and samples at 48 h of native and controlled fermentation.
Table 5. In vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory effect (%) of the juice of C. ficifolia and samples at 48 h of native and controlled fermentation.
TreatmentInhibition (%)
Juice37.4 ± 1.0
Native fermentation30.1 ± 2.9
Controlled fermentation42.0 ± 1.0 *
* Significant difference against juice (p < 0.05). One-way ANOVA, mean ± S.D., n = 3. Tukey post hoc.
Table 6. Effect on glycemia of the juice and samples at 48 h of native and controlled fermentations in: fasted normal mice and oral glucose tolerance test in mice.
Table 6. Effect on glycemia of the juice and samples at 48 h of native and controlled fermentations in: fasted normal mice and oral glucose tolerance test in mice.
Fasted normal mice
Glycemia (mg/dL)
Treatment/Doses0 min120 min240 min360 min
ISS101.9 ± 22.6100.9 ± 12.2101.6 ± 20.390.6 ± 20.9
Glibenclamide10 mg/kg102.6 ± 15.476.9 ± 12.456.6 ± 15.2 +62.3 ± 18.7 +
Juice25 mg/kg95.5 ± 10.9115.0 ± 9.992.5 ± 2.286.0 ± 15.6
50 mg/kg98.0 ± 21.0106.7 ± 3.182.0 ± 9.877.0 ± 12.5 +
Native25 mg/kg97.0 ± 5.3126.0 ± 18.682.7 ± 15.080.7 ± 13.3
50 mg/kg90.0 ± 9.995.5 ± 23.279.0 ± 18.074.3 ± 9.4
Controlled25 mg/kg93.3 ± 2.1116.0 ± 11.487.5 ± 19.183.0 ± 21.6
50 mg/kg95.7 ± 9.691.0 ± 12.276.0 ± 6.6 +72.5 ± 8.3 +
Tolerance test in mice
Glycemia (mg/dL)
Treatment0 min30 min60 min90 min120 min
ISS76.3 ± 11.7254.7 ± 27.2199.3 ± 42.8140.17 ± 29.9128.1 ± 24.6
Metformin 150 mg/kg82.0 ± 13.6128.4 ± 39.9 *92.0 ± 19.5 *90.2 ± 19.3 *87.4 ± 20.9 *
Juice 50 mg/kg83.6 ± 18.7175.0 ± 25.5 *104.5 ± 19.1 *109.3 ± 24.0115.5 ± 21.7
Native 50 mg/kg73.7 ± 24.5201.5 ± 37.5134.0 ± 12.7 *118.0 ± 10.4112.3 ± 3.5
Controlled 50 mg/kg79.0 ± 18.5157.0 ± 45.3 *108.0 ± 12.7 *108.5 ± 33.2106.0 ± 5.7
+ Significant difference against initial glycemia (t = 0). * Significant difference against ISS (p < 0.05). One-way ANOVA, mean ± S.D., n = 3. Fisher post hoc.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barrón-Álvarez, N.; Prado-Barragán, L.A.; Fortis-Barrera, M.d.l.Á.; Alarcon-Aguilar, F.J. Fermentation of the Cucurbita ficifolia Fruit Juice: Its Antioxidant Activity and Effects on the Glycemia. Beverages 2022, 8, 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages8030055

AMA Style

Barrón-Álvarez N, Prado-Barragán LA, Fortis-Barrera MdlÁ, Alarcon-Aguilar FJ. Fermentation of the Cucurbita ficifolia Fruit Juice: Its Antioxidant Activity and Effects on the Glycemia. Beverages. 2022; 8(3):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages8030055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barrón-Álvarez, Nayeli, Lilia Arely Prado-Barragán, María de los Ángeles Fortis-Barrera, and Francisco Javier Alarcon-Aguilar. 2022. "Fermentation of the Cucurbita ficifolia Fruit Juice: Its Antioxidant Activity and Effects on the Glycemia" Beverages 8, no. 3: 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages8030055

APA Style

Barrón-Álvarez, N., Prado-Barragán, L. A., Fortis-Barrera, M. d. l. Á., & Alarcon-Aguilar, F. J. (2022). Fermentation of the Cucurbita ficifolia Fruit Juice: Its Antioxidant Activity and Effects on the Glycemia. Beverages, 8(3), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages8030055

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop