Abstract
Kombucha is gaining global recognition for its potential health benefits. While traditionally made from sweetened tea, researchers are increasingly exploring local ingredients and agricultural byproducts as alternative substrates for SCOBY fermentation. As a functional beverage that embodies the concept of metabiotics—encompassing live or non-viable probiotics and their bioactive metabolites. This review highlights the holistic health benefits and sustainability aspects of kombucha. Both the fermented beverage, rich in bioactive compounds, and the cellulose-based zoogleal mat can be utilized in various applications, including medical and industrial uses. Moreover, the increasing use of local ingredients and agricultural byproducts as alternative substrates for kombucha production may further improve its sustainability and expand the range of its functional properties. Kombucha has shown promising antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, anticancer, and antidiabetic properties in pre-clinical studies, positioning it as an emerging functional food. However, further clinical trials and stronger regulatory frameworks are essential to validate its health claims and ensure consumer safety.
1. Introduction
In recent years, the global demand for functional foods and beverages has surged, due to increased consumer awareness of the link between diet and health. Among these, kombucha, a fermented beverage traditionally made from sweetened tea and now increasingly produced with a variety of alternative substrates, has gained widespread popularity for its perceived health benefits, refreshing taste, and natural origin. Originated in Northeast Asia over two millennia ago, kombucha has gained renewed global interest, largely due to consumer demand for functional foods and microbiome-supportive dietary products [1,2]. The global market for kombucha is expanding rapidly, driven by rising health awareness of consumers and continuous innovation in formulation and fermentation substrates by the producers [3].
The emerging interest in fermented foods such as kombucha arises from the concept that they are natural sources of postbiotics, defined by the International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) as a preparation of non-viable microorganisms and/or their components that confers a health benefit on the host [1]. The definition of postbiotics encompasses bioactive compounds generated through the metabolic processes of progenitor microorganisms; these compounds will be referred to as metabiotics throughout this article. Metabiotics also offer health benefits per se, for example, in short-chain fatty acids, bacteriocins, signaling molecules and other low molecular weight compounds. Postbiotics demonstrate immunomodulatory, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities [4], with additional potential as modulators of the gut–brain axis [2]. The non-viable cells or their components—classified as paraprobiotics—are also known as “ghost” or “killed” probiotics, encompassing whole inactivated microbial cells, cell lysates, or specific microbial fragments such as teichoic acids, surface proteins, peptidoglycans, chitin, pili, fimbriae, and bacterial DNA. Despite being non-viable, these components can still deliver health benefits, such as modulating the immune system and reducing inflammation [1]. Considered safer and more stable than live probiotics, postbiotics find a wider range of applications as ingredients of functional foods, pharmaceuticals, and nutraceuticals.
The kombucha fermentation process is mediated by a symbiotic consortium of bacteria and yeast (SCOBY), typically dominated by acetic acid bacteria (AAB) such as Komagataeibacter spp. and yeast genera including Zygosaccharomyces and Saccharomyces [5,6]. These microbes cooperatively convert sucrose into a variety of metabolites, including ethanol, carbon dioxide, vitamins, polyphenolic derivatives, and organic acids such as acetic acid (AA), gluconic acid (GA), and glucuronic acid (GlucUA). These bioactive compounds are thought to underline many of the beverage’s purported health benefits, such as antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory effects.
From the viewpoint of sustainability, the low-energy input process and the amenability to upcycling local agricultural byproducts make kombucha production a promising model of eco-efficient innovation. This aligns well with the principles of circular bioeconomy, thus maximizing environmental, economic, and social benefits.
This review examines the growing potential of kombucha, produced from both tea and non-tea substrates, as a sustainable source of postbiotics. It covers the microbial ecology of kombucha fermentation, the diversity of bioactive metabolites produced, and their potential as bioactives. The paper also discusses the sustainability aspects of kombucha production and highlights future directions for integrating kombucha-derived postbiotics as well as their cell-free metabiotics into functional foods, nutraceuticals, and circular bioeconomy models.
2. Connection of Kombucha to Postbiotics
In response to the limitations of using live probiotics, the study of postbiotics began in 2004 [7,8,9]. Like most fermented foods and beverages, kombucha is also regarded as a natural source of postbiotics. However, their roles and mechanisms have not yet been fully elucidated. Figure 1 illustrates the wide range of postbiotics that can derive from kombucha production, and their potential applications.
Figure 1.
Overview of connections of kombucha production to postbiotics.
Freshly brewed kombucha contains a complex community of bacteria and yeasts, which are potential probiotics. However, for safety and shelf-life purposes, most commercial kombucha products undergo pasteurization, which inactivates the microorganisms. Therefore, to be precise, most commercial kombucha products are sources of postbiotics, including bioactive molecules and parabiotics. Considered a safer alternative to probiotics, particularly for vulnerable populations such as premature infants [10,11], postbiotics can be added to a wider range of foods, beverages and supplements.
What sets kombucha apart from other fermented products is the generation of a cellulose biofilm, also known as zoogleal mat, SCOBY, tea fungus and other terms [12]. Far from being a mere byproduct, this pellicle exhibits prebiotic potential and offers a range of promising applications due to its unique structural and functional properties. Notably, it has been investigated as a bioadsorbent for heavy metals [13,14,15], an encapsulating agent in the food industry [16], a material for packaging films [17,18], a biomaterial for tissue regeneration [19,20], and an innovative material for the textile industry [21,22]. These applications contribute to making kombucha highly sustainable by promoting a zero-waste approach.
3. Microbial Ecology of Kombucha Fermentation
3.1. Kombucha Fermentation
Black, oolong, and green tea combined with sucrose has traditionally served as the primary substrate for kombucha fermentation. An overview of the standard stages in traditional kombucha production and the corresponding microbial communities involved, is illustrated in Figure 2 [23]. Within the SCOBY, a range of symbiotic interactions takes place. Kombucha fermentation is primarily driven by acetic acid bacteria (AAB) from the genera Komagataeibacter, Acetobacter, and Gluconobacter, along with yeasts such as Zygosaccharomyces, Saccharomyces, and Brettanomyces [24,25]. Additionally, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), including Lactobacillus and Leuconostoc, have been frequently identified in the beverage [6,24]. Initially, studies on the microbial composition of kombucha relied on culture-dependent methods [24,25]. However, the introduction of culture-independent techniques such as microbiome analysis and metabarcoding has significantly enhanced the understanding of the microbial diversity, metabolic processes, and interactions within the kombucha ecosystem [6]. Research employing high-throughput sequencing techniques has revealed that yeasts from the genera Candida and Zygosaccharomyces dominate in kombucha at the end of fermentation. Among bacteria, the most prevalent genera include Komagataeibacter, Lyngbya, Gluconobacter, Lactobacilli, and Bifidobacteria [26,27].
Figure 2.
Typical steps of traditional kombucha production and microbial ecology involved. The different background colors represent a different group of microorganisms.
The fermentative process starts with yeasts secreting invertases (β-fructofuranosidase, EC 3.2.1.26), which break down sucrose into glucose and fructose, key substrates for subsequent metabolic activity. Then, Saccharomyces species metabolize glucose to produce ethanol, while Zygosaccharomyces species are more efficient at converting fructose into ethanol. Among the SCOBY components, yeasts are the primary producers ethanol, which is subsequently oxidized by AAB to form AA [28]. Komagataeibacter species, meanwhile, utilize glucose to synthesize bacterial cellulose, although ethanol, sucrose, and glycerol can also contribute to this process [29,30]. Besides AA and cellulose, AAB also produces GlucUA, which is associated with several health-promoting effects [29,31]. Furthermore, some Gluconobacter strains can convert D-sorbitol, derived from glucose, into vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid) [31].
Some lactic acid bacteria (LAB) species can metabolize glucose, yielding lactic acid as the primary product, while others may produce lactic acid along with ethanol and carbon dioxide through the pentose phosphate pathway. When fermenting fructose, LAB may produce AA instead of ethanol [32]. Additional compounds derived from bacterial and yeast metabolism in kombucha are discussed in Section 4 of this article.
The specific microbial composition and resulting metabolite profile of kombucha are influenced by several variables, including the type and concentration of tea and sugar used, SCOBY composition, oxygen availability, fermentation length, temperature, and storage conditions [6,12,23,33]. The typically low pH of kombucha, primarily due to elevated levels of AA, has been shown to inhibit the growth of various pathogenic microorganisms, such as Helicobacter pylori, Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Campylobacter jejuni [34,35,36,37,38]. Notably, kombucha retains antimicrobial activity even at neutral pH and following heat treatment, indicating the presence of additional antimicrobial compounds beyond AA.
Although it is originally made from sweetened tea (Camellia sinensis), kombucha is now being produced with alternative substrates such as fruits, fruit peels, milk, coffee, flower teas and herbal infusions [23,26,27,39,40,41]. Apart from increasing the diversity of flavors, metabolic profiles, and function claims of the final product, the use of alternative raw materials may also improve sustainability by encouraging the use of local produce (discussed in Section 6).
Some of the alternative base ingredients are listed in Table 1. Preparing kombucha from alternative sources often involves additional processing steps, especially when using fruits or agro-industrial byproducts. Primarily derived from fruit processing, these novel raw materials provide a diverse range of nutrients and phytochemical as substrates for SCOBY fermentation, opening new avenues for kombucha fermentation research [39,40,41].
Table 1.
Alternative raw materials that have been studied in kombucha production.
By incorporating alternative substrates in place of traditional tea, researchers have been able to investigate how fermentation unfolds and identify the key metabolites produced during the process. These investigations typically focus on sugar consumption, organic acid production, and the presence of bioactive compounds. While each substrate exhibits unique fermentation characteristics, the overall fermentation pattern tends to mirror that of traditional kombucha, marked by a decrease in pH, increased production of organic acids, and elevated levels of total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity.
Although beverages made from non-Camellia sinensis sources cannot be classified as true kombucha, they are often referred to as “kombucha-like” due to the use of SCOBY as the starter culture. The complexity of these alternative substrates together with the variety of consortium in the SCOBY attract researchers to explore the fermentation results. These alternatives have also shown favorable sensory characteristics [39]. Despite the interest in diversifying kombucha substrates, relatively few studies have focused on how well SCOBYs adapt to these new environments [39,40,41]. Future research should therefore aim to assess the microbial dynamics, compatibility and adaptability of SCOBY cultures in fermenting alternative raw materials.
3.2. Kombucha SCOBY-Related Postbiotics
The health-promoting properties of kombucha have been primarily attributed to its probiotic content [91]. LAB and yeasts are already established as probiotics, while recent research also suggests that AAB may also be characterized as such [92]. Emerging studies on postbiotics reinforce the potential of kombucha as a functional beverage, as it encompasses not only viable bacterial cultures but also microbial metabolites and cellular components AAB, LAB and yeasts, similar to other fermented foods [93]. However, considering that inactivation processes can extend shelf life and facilitate distribution logistics, postbiotics may represent the best form of delivering the health benefits associated with kombucha.
Nevertheless, to classify kombucha as a postbiotic product, it is necessary to identify the specific strains used, detail the methods of microbial inactivation, and quantify the resulting postbiotic composition [94]. Studies on the safety of kombucha consumption are also warranted, as the fermentation process may sometimes allow growth of pathogenic or toxin-producing microorganisms, especially when good manufacturing practices are not implemented or not enough optimization is done before using a novel substrate.
Although kombucha is a potential source of probiotic microorganisms, research into its postbiotic properties remains limited, offering a promising direction for future studies.
4. Metabolites Produced During Kombucha Fermentation
Bioactive metabolites are the result of microbial activity during fermentation, primarily from yeasts and bacteria. These microbial metabolites, especially organic acids, phenolic compounds, vitamins and minerals, and DSL (D-saccharic acid-1,4-lactone), are characteristic components of postbiotics (Figure 3). The different types of bioactive metabolites and postbiotics, along with its sources and ranges from previous studies are summarized in Table 2.
Figure 3.
Bioactive metabolites and postbiotics produced during kombucha fermentation, including organic acids (e.g., AA, GA, and GlucUA), polyphenols, vitamins, and microbial-derived compounds. These components contribute to the beverage’s antioxidant capacity, antimicrobial effects, and potential health-promoting properties.
Table 2.
Bioactive metabolites that have been studied in kombucha production.
4.1. Organic Acids
Organic acids play a significant role in influencing the sensory qualities, chemical composition, and microbiological stability of food and beverages [73]. As fermentation advances, the levels of organic acids in the beverage gradually rise, leading to a reduction in pH. This acidification contributes to preservation and limits the growth of unwanted bacteria and fungi within the SCOBY [82,103,104]. Among the various organic acids present in kombucha, AA, GA, and GlucA are the most prominent, with AA being the most abundant [109]. On the other hand, high concentration of AA imparts a vinegar-like taste to kombucha, often having a negative impact on its flavor appeal.
AA is produced by AAB from ethanol via alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase. Its concentration during fermentation varies depending on factors such as temperature, type of SCOBY, and raw materials used. For example, a study reported 1.91 g/L AA after 13 days of fermentation in black tea kombucha [87] and 5.56 g/L after 7 days of fermentation at 22 °C using green tea as substrate [95]. The amount of sucrose also influences yeast and lactic acid bacteria activity, and consequently ethanol and AA production. Lower sucrose levels result in lower alcohol and AA content. Over extended fermentation periods, AAB may begin oxidizing AA, leading to a gradual reduction in its concentration. Consumption of AA is considered beneficial due to its ability to suppress the activity of disaccharidase enzymes, slowing down gastric emptying and postprandial blood glucose levels. Additionally, AA may enhance glucose uptake in the liver and muscles by promoting glycogen synthesis in Streptozotocin induced diabetic rats [110], therefore being a potential functional compound in the prevention/management of type II diabetes.
GA is a naturally occurring compound known for enhancing the sensory qualities of products such as wine, vinegar, and honey by adding a mildly bitter yet refreshing flavor [111]. It is formed through the oxidation of D-glucose, primarily by AAB like Gluconobacter oxydans and Komagataeibacter xylinus [112]. Fermentation is generally believed to begin with the conversion of glucose into GA by K. xylinus [113]. GA has a wide range of applications as food additive and preservative, as well as in pharmaceutical products for treating anemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia [112]. In a 60-day tea fermentation study by Chen and Liu [96], GA reached a concentration of 39 g/L, although its production was not observed during the initial days of fermentation [96]. Another study on kombucha made from Zijuan tea GA peaked at 2.3 g/L on the 14th day of fermentation [71]. GA seems to be a key flavor compound in kombucha, imparting a mild, smooth, and refreshing taste to the beverage [114]. Additional research is required to determine which substrates and fermentation conditions result in the production of GA and other compounds that improve the flavor profile.
GlcUA is produced by the oxidation of glucose by AAB belonging to the Komagataeibacter genus and is of particular interest among the organic acids produced during fermentation [113]. First, this compound plays a crucial role in the body’s detoxification process due to its ability to bind to endobiotics (compounds produced within the body, such as bilirubin), as well as xenobiotics promoting their metabolic clearance. Additionally, it also plays a key role in maintaining hormone balance by enhancing the solubility and excretion of steroid hormones when necessary [92,115,116]. Studies have shown wide variation in GlucUA levels in kombucha. For example, Nguyen et al. [97] observed 0.03 g/L on the fifth day of fermentation using a SCOBY without lactic acid bacteria, Jayabalan et al. [98] found 1.71 g/L after 18 days, and Lončar et al. [99] reported 0.016 g/L after 21 days of fermentation. By the end of the kombucha fermentation process, GlucUA acid levels ranged from 0.839 to 1.158 g/L, whereas no detectable amount was present at the start of fermentation [76].
In all varieties of kombucha beverages, minor organic acids such as succinic, citric, quinic, and malic acids were also found at concentrations below 1 g/L [71].
4.2. Polyphenols and Derivatives
Traditional kombucha prepared from green, oolong, and black teas contains significant levels of phenolic compounds, which contribute to its health-promoting properties. These compounds are known for their antioxidant activity, and are associated with a reduced risk of degenerative conditions, cardiovascular issues, neurodegenerative disorders, and certain cancers [117]. The main phenolic compounds in kombucha include catechins, predominantly found in green tea, as well as theaflavins and thearubigins, which are more abundant in black tea [109]. Generally, green and yellow tea contain higher levels of total catechins compared to oolong, white, or black tea. Quercetin and myricetin are also found in higher amounts in green tea, while black tea provides a richer source of kaempferol [118]. Utilizing different types of tea leaves for kombucha fermentation, thus, shows improved in vitro antioxidant properties, including superoxide radical scavenging activity and reducing power [119].
Studies have shown that kombucha contains higher levels of total polyphenols and flavonoids compared to sweetened black tea [24,120,121,122,123], likely due to the breakdown of complex compounds into smaller/simpler phenolics during fermentation. While overall catechin content declines during fermentation, concentrations of specific catechins like epigallocatechin (EGC) and epicatechin (EC) tend to increase [100]. Research also indicates that kombucha made from guava juice extract contains significant amounts of phenolic compounds such as gallic acid, catechin (C), guaiacol, and coumaric acid [101]. Furthermore, ester-type catechins like EGCG, ECG, and GCG decrease over time, whereas non-ester types including EC, C, and EGC show slight increases. Understanding the interactions between phenolic compounds and microbial activity is essential for optimizing SCOBY development and enhancing kombucha’s functional properties.
4.3. Vitamins and Minerals
Kombucha contains a diverse range of water-soluble vitamins derived from green and black tea, including vitamin C and B-complex vitamins such as thiamine (B1), riboflavin (B2), niacin (B3), pantothenic acid (B5), B6, biotin, folate (B9), and cobalamin (B12) [124]. These vitamins play essential roles in numerous physiological and biochemical processes but cannot be produced by the human body, making dietary intake necessary to maintain adequate levels [125]. Vitamins may also be produced or metabolized by microorganisms, and some interesting reports have determined the concentration of hydrosolubilic vitamins content that shown an increase in vitamin C levels during kombucha fermentation, from 0.71 to 1.51 mg/L by the fifteenth day. Moreover, the levels of B vitamins also rose, with vitamin B1, B6, and B12, initially at 0.46, 0.29, and 0.36 to reaching concentrations of 0.74, 0.52, and 0.84 g/L, respectively [102]. LAB and yeasts can produce B-complex vitamins, which may account for the increase in their concentrations during kombucha fermentation. Strains like Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Limosilactobacillus fermentum, and Lactococcus lactis synthesize vitamins B1, B2, and B9. Yeasts like Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zygosaccharomyces bailii also synthesize B-complex vitamins (B1–B12) and ergosterol, a precursor of vitamin D2 [28].
Kombucha contains various minerals derived primarily from the tea used in its preparation. Green and black tea–based kombucha includes essential minerals like potassium (K+), cobalt (Co2+), manganese (Mn4+), copper (Cu2+), iron (Fe2+), magnesium (Mg2+), and fluoride (F−). Bauer-Petrovska and Petrushevska-Tozi [102] measured trace amounts of these and other elements, reporting concentrations from 0.004 μg/mL for cobalt to 0.462 μg/mL for magnesium [102]. Toxic metals like lead (0.005 μg/mL which acceptable limit should not exceed 70–100 μg/mL in adults) [126] and chromium (0.001 μg/mL which the maximum concentration of 0.05 mg/L (50 ppb) is allowed in drinking water) [127] were also present, while cadmium was undetected. Unlike vitamins that can be syntesized by the microbial consortium, minerals are not. Fermentation has been shown to increase levels of some minerals (Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn), but not cobalt [102] which could be from SCOBY or additives from fermentation.
A concern over fluorine content in kombucha has been discussed. Fluoride supports hard tissue mineralization, but excessive intake can be harmful. Kombucha contains fluorine, primarily derived from the tea used in its production. Most dietary fluorine comes from food and beverages like tea, while a smaller portion comes from water and dental products. Jakubcyk et al. [103] found that fluorine levels in kombucha vary by tea type, ranging from 0.42 to 0.93 mg/L, lowest in white tea and highest in green tea. Since municipal water may also add fluorine, the total content in kombucha can vary. A single glass of kombucha can meaningfully contribute to an adult’s recommended daily fluorine intake [103].
4.4. DSL (D-Saccharic Acid-1,4-Lactone)
DSL is regarded as one of the most beneficial compounds in kombucha. Absent in unfermented tea [24], DSL is produced during fermentation through the activity of bacteria from the Gluconacetobacter genus. In particular, the Gluconacetobacter sp. A4 strain, when paired with lactic acid bacteria, has been shown to enhance DSL production [128]. DSL acts as a glucuronidase inhibitor, an enzyme linked to cancer development, exhibits strong antioxidant activity, and helps protect pancreatic β-cells from apoptotic damage. DSL is also linked to antioxidant activity, hepatoprotective effects, and reducing hyperglycemia, as well as preserving key compounds like GlucUA acid and glycosaminoglycans [105]. The concentration of DSL in the final kombucha product depends on both the type of tea infusion and the specific SCOBY used for fermentation. DSL concentration falls typically within the range of 0.48–2.24 g/L during a 21 d fermentation of black tea kombucha [24], while higher amounts have been reported in Thai kombucha: 5.23 g/L (black tea) and 3.44 g/L (green tea) after a 15 d fermentation [104]. Lower levels (0.057–0.132 g/L) were reported in Chinese kombucha, likely due to differing raw material and SCOBY compositions [105].
4.5. Emerging Trend for Metabiotics Studies in Kombucha
Beyond traditional components, new research highlights the presence of emerging metabolites such as exopolysaccharides (EPS), bioactive peptides, and various small molecules identified through advanced metabolomics. These compounds contribute to the functional properties of kombucha, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, and immunomodulatory effects [106,107,108,129,130,131]. As metabolomic tools continue to evolve, the identification and characterization of these emerging metabolites reveal new opportunities for understanding kombucha’s health-promoting potential and expanding its use in functional food and nutraceutical applications.
A research group from Germany investigated the presence and structural characteristics of water-soluble EPS in kombucha fermented with green or black tea using SCOBYs from various sources [106]. After isolation, enzymatic hydrolysis, and structural analysis by NMR spectroscopy, levans (fructose-based polysaccharides) were identified as the predominant EPS in all kombucha samples, with minimal amounts of glucans detected. The levans exhibited low molecular weight and a variable degree of branching at position O1 (4.3–7.9%), and their concentration ranged from 33 to 562 mg/L depending on the SCOBY and tea type used [106]. This work provides the first detailed characterization of kombucha-derived levans and highlights the influence of fermentation conditions on their structural diversity.
Peng et al. (2023) explored the fermentation of soy milk with kombucha and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) to improve its stability, flavor, and functional properties [129]. In their study, FOS induced the growth of beneficial microbes, increased antioxidant activity, and boosted the production of health-related compounds like β-glucosidase and genistein. The optimal fermentation time was 84 h, during which the soy milk showed improved taste, reduced off-flavors, and higher levels of favorable compounds like citric acid and linalool. This symbiotic fermentation approach shows potential for the improvement of organoleptic characteristics of plant-based dairy alternatives [129].
In 2024, Larini et al. presented the first genomic and functional analysis of Liquorilactobacillus nagelii VUCC-R001, a strain isolated from kombucha tea. The nearly complete, high-quality genome reported no genes linked to antibiotic resistance, virulence, or biogenic amine production, confirming its safety. Notably, the strain was capable of producing high levels of d-phenyllactic acid (52 mg/L) and dextran, highlighting its potential for use in food and biomedical applications. These findings offer new insights into the biotechnological potential of L. nagelii and its role in fermented foods [107].
Khan et al. [108] investigated the nutritional and microbial dynamics of green tea kombucha during fermentation, focusing on 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF), a vital folate derivative. Molecular analysis identified Microbacterium as the dominant genus, though species-level identification remained inconclusive. 5-MTHF levels increased over time, reaching up to 50.87 μg/mL in the liquid and 54.88 μg/mL in the biofilm by day 21. While total phenolic content rose during fermentation, flavonoids and carotenoids decreased. Notably, this is the first report of 5-MTHF in kombucha, highlighting its nutritional potential, especially for prenatal health. Fermentation between days 7–14 was optimal for maximizing bioactive compounds [108].
The potential effects of cell-free metabolites from Gluconobacter oxydans strains isolated from kombucha, focusing on their safety, antimicrobial activity, and anticancer properties were evaluated [130]. Using gastric (AGS), colorectal (HT-29), and healthy (HUVEC) human cell lines, the results confirmed the safety of the tested strains and demonstrated notable anticancer activity, particularly against gastric adenoma cells. Among the strains, KNS30 showed the strongest potential. These findings suggest that kombucha-derived AAB may serve as a source of safe and effective postbiotics for cancer prevention or complementary therapy.
Verdier et al. [131] investigated nitrogenous nutrient dynamics during kombucha fermentation, focusing on protein and free amino nitrogen (FAN) levels over 12 days. By comparing monocultures, cocultures, and original kombucha, researchers found that microbial interactions influenced FAN consumption and supported more stable nutrient use and microbial growth. Electrophoresis revealed a common 15 kDa protein and a unique 21 kDa protein linked to Acetobacter indonesiensis, along with moonlighting proteins and extracellular vesicles from this bacterium. These findings highlight the complex role of microbial consortia in nutrient management and suggest new functions for bacterial vesicles in kombucha fermentation [131].
5. Health Benefits and Functional Properties of Kombucha-Derived Postbiotics
As mentioned in Section 4, the combined activity of the diverse microbes in the SCOBY, produce a broad range of metabiotics. These metabolites have been shown to offer various health benefits, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antibacterial, antidiabetic, and anticancer activities, primarily in pre-clinical studies. Additional effects include cholesterol reduction, enhanced liver metabolism, strengthening of the immune function, and improved gastrointestinal health, usually when consumed as whole foods, i.e., containing both the whole range of probiotics and postbiotics [132]. A notable trend in the development of functional foods is the resurgence of traditional fermentation techniques utilizing wild starters, rather than single-organism starters. Sourdough bread, sauerkraut, keffir, and amazake are all examples of traditional foods and beverages that are experiencing a revival, mainly due to an increased awareness of gut health. New probiotic, symbiotic, or postbiotic products usually involve formulations with microbial consortia, particularly combinations of lactic acid bacteria (e.g., Lactobacillus spp.) and yeasts (e.g., Saccharomyces spp.), to better regulate metabolite production and interspecies interactions [133,134,135] and meet the demands of health-conscious consumers.
5.1. Antioxidant Activity
The antioxidant activity of kombucha is primarily attributed to the production of metabiotics by its diverse microbial consortium, with flavanols being the main compounds responsible for these effects. During microbial fermentation, flavanols undergo structural modifications that lead to the conjugation of aromatic rings and the presence of free 3-OH groups. This biotransformation enhances the antioxidant potential of flavanols, as well as other flavonoids in kombucha, when assessed through metal ion chelation, scavenging of prooxidant enzymes, and inhibition of molecular oxidative processes [136,137,138].
5.2. Antimicrobial Activity
The antibacterial properties of kombucha are primarily attributed to its organic acids, polyphenols, and lactic acid bacteria [139]. The kombucha SCOBY microbiome produces various metabiotics, primarily organic acids (notably AA), phenolic compounds, bacteriocins from LAB, alcohols, and aldehydes, as well as, paraprobiotics like moonlight proteins (Table 3). These postbiotics act synergistically to inhibit a broad spectrum of pathogenic bacteria and fungi, including common foodborne and human pathogens. The antimicrobial potency depends on the fermentation conditions, microbial composition, and substrate type. This complex microbial interaction enhances kombucha’s potential as a natural antimicrobial and food preservative agent. Kombucha postbiotics exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against a variety of pathogenic microorganisms. Among bacteria, strains shown to be inhibited include Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Helicobacter pylori, Campylobacter jejuni, Yersinia enterocolitica, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Shigella sonnei, Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella Typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus, Proteus hauseri, Shigella dysenteriae, Salmonella Typhi, Vibrio cholerae, and multiple Alicyclobacillus species such as A. acidoterrestris, A. herbarius, A. acidophilus, A. acycloheptanicus, and A. hesperidum. In terms of antifungal activity, kombucha-derived compounds have been shown to inhibit Candida albicans and several human-pathogenic fungi, including Alternaria species, Aspergillus flavus, Fusarium oxysporum, and Trichoderma species [35,73,101,140].
Table 3.
Summary of Antimicrobial Mechanisms in Kombucha.
5.3. Anicarcinogenic Activity
Kombucha contains various bioactive compounds that contribute to its anticancer potential. These include GlucUA, GA, DSL, AA, ascorbic acid, succinic acid, dimethyl 2-(2-hydroxy-2-methoxypropylidene) malonate, and vitexin. These compounds are known to interact with key cancer-related protein targets such as HIF-1α, VEGF, IL-8, COX-2, as well as apoptotic regulators including caspases-3, -8, and -9, PARP, Bax, Bcl-2, p53, p21, MMP-2, MMP-9, and β-actin [141]. The anti-carcinogenic potential of kombucha is partly attributed to GlucUA, a key metabiotic produced during fermentation. This compound supports the body’s detoxification system by conjugating carcinogens and other toxins to form glucuronides, water-soluble molecules that are efficiently excreted in urine. This process reduces the overall toxic load in the body and, consequently, the risk of cancer. Additionally, GlucUA helps sustain this detoxified state by inhibiting β-glucuronidase, an enzyme that can reverse the detoxification process by releasing free carcinogens from glucuronides [116]. Other fermentation by-products in kombucha, including GA and DSL, also demonstrate synergistic anticancer effects, further highlighting kombucha’s potential as a functional beverage for cancer risk reduction [141,142].
5.4. Gut–Brain Axis
An increasing amount of research supports the interconnected relationship between the brain and the gut microbiota. This connection, known as the gut–brain axis, is a bidirectional communication network that influences both physiological and psychological functions. The gut microbiota can affect brain activity through metabolites and signaling molecules that travel via the bloodstream. Conversely, the brain can alter the composition and activity of gut microbes through neuronal and hormonal mechanisms. This complex interaction is primarily mediated by three key pathways: the autonomic nervous system (including the enteric nervous system and the vagus nerve), the immune system, and the neuroendocrine system [143].
Kombucha is well known for its rich content of probiotics and parabiotics. Probiotics, in particular, have been scientifically proven to support the gut–brain axis, playing a beneficial role in both digestive and mental health. However, as stated by Batista et al. [143], scientific evidence on the effects of kombucha on mental health and the gut–brain axis is currently limited, with only a few inconclusive studies available. While kombucha may potentially offer indirect neuroprotective benefits due to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory effects, there is a lack of data from clinical trials to confirm these effects. The effects from kombucha metabiotics such as glutamate and GABA, which are involved in mood regulation and cognitive function, also await corroboration from interventional studies. Rigorous pre-clinical studies and the establishment of standardized production guidelines are urgently needed prior to evaluating the safety, efficacy, and potential role of kombucha in mental health support [143].
5.5. Antidiabetic Effect
Although the antidiabetic effects of kombucha tea have been investigated in vitro, further clinical trials are necessary to confirm its efficacy in reducing glucose absorption into the bloodstream. Several studies have demonstrated that kombucha exhibits inhibitory activity against α-amylase and α-glucosidase, key enzymes involved in carbohydrate hydrolysis, thereby mitigating postprandial hyperglycemia by delaying glucose uptake [144,145,146]. Another aspect of its antidiabetic effect is attributed to its antioxidant capacity, a key contributor to diabetes pathogenesis [147]. As discussed in Section 5.5, antioxidant activity increases with extended fermentation due to the accumulation of flavonoid metabolites. In the recent study by Mouguech et al. [148], they explored the sustainable conversion of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) leaf waste from southern Tunisia into value-added products through kombucha fermentation, using two local varieties, Deglet Nour and Alig. Fermentation significantly enhanced the total phenolic content and bioactivity, particularly in the ethyl acetate extract of Alig, which showed strong antioxidant (82.76% DPPH inhibition) and antidiabetic activity (IC50 = 20 µg/mL) [148]. Collectively, these findings support the potential of Kombucha as a functional beverage with relevance in diabetes management, but robust, high-quality clinical studies are essential to validate the therapeutic potential of these products and to determine the most effective strategies for their use in managing glycemic control in individuals with diabetes.
6. Sustainability Aspects of Kombucha Production
The global food and beverage industry has raised its concern about sustainability, including climate change, waste management, and resource depletion [149]. Not only are consumers seeking sustainable or green products, but producers also want to create products that minimize environmental impact, support circular economies, and use resources efficiently. Kombucha is famous for its health benefits; however, with growing concern about sustainability, its production should align with sustainable approaches [150,151].
6.1. Low-Impact Production Process
Kombucha production is simple, involving a fermentation process. The main ingredients are water, tea, sugar, and SCOBY [23]. The fermentation is carried out between 20 and 30 °C, so there is no need for energy-intensive temperature control systems [152]. Its process ranges from 7 to 14 days, depending on the desired acidity and flavor profiles [152,153]. The short production time contributes to a short turnover, which reduces the need for prolonged storage. It means that the process will not require high energy.
Decentralized production is also one practice that provides another sustainability advantage. Kombucha can be produced at home or by small-scale local businesses, which reduces long-distance transportation from large-scale centralized operations [154]. This localized approach contributes to lower greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption resulting from transportation. However, fermented foods can harbor spoilage bacteria and toxin-producing fungi. Thus, proper microbiological and toxicological monitoring remains a challenge for small producers.
6.2. Utilization of Alternative By-Products for Kombucha Production
The sustainability of kombucha production can be enhanced by incorporating food and agricultural waste, promoting both waste reduction and efficient resource use. Defective fruits and herbs that cannot be sold as fresh produce can be used as substrates in kombucha production [155,156,157]. This practice reduces the environmental impact of food waste, while presenting opportunities to improve the flavor profile of kombucha [155]. Another promising approach is the use of cocoa bean shells as raw materials in kombucha-like beverage [158]. It can reduce waste generated from cocoa production, decrease environmental impact, and increase resource efficiency. Kombucha production can also be produced using olive leaves, which are rich in polyphenols [157]. The total phenolic content of tea kombucha and kombucha produced with olive leaves is similar [157]. This substitution can replace traditional tea, lowering both costs and waste.
Alternative sugar sources and agricultural by-products, such as molasses, fruit peels or their extracts, and coffee by-products, have been explored as sustainable alternatives to refined cane sugar [155,159,160]. Molasses is considered a good ingredient for fermentation because it is cheap and contains nutrients for bacteria and yeast [153]. Cheap by-products, including tea dust and molasses, can be used as nitrogen and carbon sources for kombucha production [153]. Angela et al. [161] also focused on using molasses instead of table sugar to produce bacterial cellulose through the kombucha fermentation process. These materials are by-products of food processing chains. Utilizing these resources offers cost-effective and environmentally friendly options for kombucha production.
The use of cherry, persimmon, and pomegranate instead of tea leaves showed that the fruit-derived kombucha reaches the target pH faster than traditional kombucha produced with tea leaves [162]. The shorter fermentation time contributes to a reduced processing period. This means that the total operating cost can be lowered, providing economic benefits.
Apart from its ingredients, kombucha production generates solid waste, such as spent tea leaves or fruit residues, which are biodegradable and can be composted or repurposed. Some producers have utilized these by-products in composting or animal feed, promoting zero-waste principle. Utilizing waste materials can lower production costs while promoting environmental sustainability by reducing landfill contributions [163,164]. Using local by-products as alternative ingredients in kombucha production can also support the local economy and reduce waste. This offers benefits in all areas of sustainability, including economic, environmental, and social aspects.
6.3. Kombucha in the Circular Bioeconomy
With the kombucha market projected to grow by USD 7.97 billion from 2024 to 2029 at a Compound Annual Growth Rate of 23.5% [165], this growth supports kombucha’s role in the circular bioeconomy. Circular economy supports sustainability by transforming traditional linear supply chains into circular supply chains through reducing, reusing, recycling, and repurposing [166]. Kombucha promotes a circular bioeconomy by transforming biological resources and by-products into high-value materials [167,168]. A circular economy between the food and beverages segment and other industries can be applied [169].
The SCOBY, which plays a key role in fermentation, can be repurposed after its primary use in kombucha production. It is reported that there is an active international trade of SCOBY, reflecting its growing commercial value and applications in functional food and beverage industries [170,171]. Mat Zin Boestami et al. [172] studied the use of pumpkin peel to produce kombucha SCOBY cellulose and found that the physicochemical properties of the cellulose are similar to the kombucha SCOBY cellulose produced from tea. From this aspect, it promotes a circular bioeconomy in which by-products from other industries are utilized.
The spent SCOBY biomass can be utilized as a biodegradable polymer with a wide range of applications because it is also a source of bacterial cellulose [173]. This cellulose can be processed into bio-leather for use in textiles, footwear, or packaging, serving as sustainable alternatives to animal-derived leathers or petroleum-based plastics [169,174,175,176,177,178]. In some cases, they have shown potential for use in pharmaceutical products due to their bioactive properties and pharmacological effects [40,170]. Other applications include the potential use of SCOBY as a biosorbent [5] and a living filtration membrane for water treatment [179].
Circularity can be achieved by integrating kombucha production with local agriculture. Kombucha producers can utilize fruit residues or herb waste from local farms while returning composted residues or SCOBY biomass as organic soil amendments. These synergistic models support nutrient cycling, reduce waste transport, and promote social collaboration among stakeholders in the supply chain [180,181].
7. Food Safety Aspects of Kombucha
While kombucha gains recognition as a potential functional beverage, it is important to acknowledge that inherent risks may be associated with the consumption of ‘novel’ foods, even when there is an established history of their use within certain countries, regions, or communities.
Safety issues may arise in cases of kombucha overconsumption or associated with alcohol intake, or intake by individuals with underlying health conditions [182]. There has been a reported case of severe liver necrosis in a 42-year-old woman following daily consumption of 940 mL (32 ounces) of kombucha, in conjunction with wine, over a three-month period [183]. Usnic acid, a compound previously associated with liver cell necrosis in animal studies, was discussed as a potential cause in this case [183]. CDC has also reported two cases of severe acidosis by kombucha, including one fatality [5]. However, FDA analysis did not detect pathogens or toxins in the tea, and other 115 persons who drank kombucha made with SCOBY from the same source did not experience any adverse effect [5]. A 22 year-old male with HIV, presented fever, and shortness of breath within twelve hours of Kombucha ingestion [4]. Other reported adverse effects probably linked to kombucha consumption are: jaundice (55 year-old woman with alcoholic liver disease) [182]; nausea, vomiting, and head and neck pain (51 year-old woman, taking thyroid hormone and estrogen replacements) [182]; allergic reactions (two patients) [184]; autoimmune inflammatory muscle disease in a 53 year-old Asian man with predisposition factors [185]; and a rare sinus infection by Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis in a 77 year-old woman with sinus carcinoma [186]. Two cases of lead intoxication through kombucha, and one case related to kefir consumption. [187,188] In all cases, lead-glazed ceramic pots have been used for fermentation, suggesting that acids produced during fermentation eluted lead from the glaze. Lead is also known to be eluted from crystal decanters to wine and spirits contained in it, thus emphasizing the importance of standardizing manufacturing practices to avoid such pitfalls.
The potential risks of kombucha consumption have been reviewed by Jalayaban et al. [5], and de Miranda et al. [189]. The adverse effects documented in these publications, which are separated by eight years, showed little difference, indicating no widespread safety issues associated with kombucha consumption in moderate quantities (less than 120 mL per day). However, there is still lack of data indicating what would be the upper limit for safe consumption. In addition, the varying alcohol content suggests that kombucha should be avoided by expecting women and children [189].
Similarly to other fermented foods, kombucha relies on a rapid pH drop to avoid growth of spoilage and pathogenic bacteria. Although necessary as a carbon source, the addition of sucrose to tea creates a nutrient-rich environment conducive to the proliferation of opportunistic bacteria or fungi that may be introduced during the brewing process, particularly under suboptimal hygiene conditions and inadequate temperature control during preparation and fermentation, as well as from the source of SCOBY. Hence, fermented foods are by nature prone to microbiological safety concerns. To illustrate, yogurt and other fermented dairy products were responsible for 15 outbreaks between 2005 and 2022 in the USA, Canada and Europe, mainly caused by pathogenic bacteria (Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, E. coli) and molds, as well as their toxins [190]. Major product recalls of dairy products are still fairly common, even in developed countries. Nevertheless, this represents a major progress from the 1940s when raw milk and associated products were responsible for 25% of all foodborne and waterborne disease outbreaks [191].
As the consumption of kombucha extends beyond its traditional context, it is crucial to address the accompanying safety concerns with appropriate scrutiny. The wider distribution and increased popularity kombucha may heighten the risk profile and potential issue. This highlights the necessity of implementing good manufacturing practices (GMP) and good hygiene practices (GHP) to ensure that the final product remains both functional and safe for consumers. Establishing regulatory frameworks is also an important step to ensure the safety of kombucha products. Brazil (Normative Instruction No. 41, 17 September 2019, from the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply, MAPA, [192]), and Canada (Safety of fermented foods, BC Centre for Disease Control (BCCD) [190] have already implemented such measures aiming at standardizing manufacturing and hygiene practices, and setting guidelines to protect the consumer, especially those who may be more vulnerable to adverse effects.
8. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
Kombucha represents a promising functional beverage with potential health-promoting properties, arising from its content of probiotics and postbiotics (including metabiotics and paraprobiotics) that emerge during fermentation. This review emphasizes the relevance of these metabiotic components and their interplay in the context of kombucha fermentation. Despite its growing popularity mainly supported by anecdotal evidences, significant challenges remain in establishing kombucha as a scientifically validated functional beverage. There is a critical need for rigorous, controlled clinical trials in humans to substantiate its health claims and elucidate its mechanisms of action. The development of standardized kombucha models for experimental reproducibility is also essential, given the wide variability in composition due to fermentation conditions, microbial consortia, and substrate choice.
Kombucha, as a source of metabiotics, holds promise for various health benefits and represents a sustainable, health-promoting beverage. However, more interventional studies and evidence-based research is needed for promoting kombucha consumption as part of a health-supportive diet. Conversely, kombucha demonstrates potential for use as a sustainable adsorbent and in the development of novel materials, highlighting its versatility not only as a bioactive beverage but also as a source of environmentally friendly, cellulose-like material.
Recent advances in precision fermentation and microbial bioengineering may improve the targeted production of bioactive metabolites in kombucha, improving its consistency, functional potential, and safety. Robust safety assessments and regulatory frameworks are also paramount to ensure product quality and consumer safety.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.T. and S.K.; resources, S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.T., S.K. and S.A.K.; writing—review and editing, L.Y.; visualization, L.L.; supervision, A.T.; project administration, A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
| SCOBY | Symbiotic Consortium Of Bacteria and Yeast |
| AAB | Acetic Acid Bacteria |
| LAB | Lactic Acid Bacteria |
| AA | Acetic Acid |
| GA | Gluconic Acid |
| GlcUA | Glucuronic Acid |
| DSL | D-saccharic acid-1,4-lactone |
| EGCG | Epigallocatechin gallate |
| EGC | Epigallocatechin |
| EC | Epicatechin |
| ECG | Epicatechin gallate |
| GCG | Gallocatechin gallate |
| GC | Gallocatechin |
| C | Catechin |
| TPC | Total Phenolic Content |
| EPS | Exopolysaccharides |
| FOS | Fructo-oligosaccharides |
| 5-MTHF | 5-methyltetrahydrofolate |
| FAN | Free Amino Nitrogen |
| GABA | Gamma-Aminobutyric acid |
References
- Greenwalt, C.J.; Steinkraus, K.H.; Ledford, R.A. Kombucha, the fermented tea: Microbiology, composition, and claimed health effects. J. Food Prot. 2000, 63, 976–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villarreal-Soto, S.A.; Beaufort, S.; Bouajila, J.; Souchard, J.P.; Taillandier, P. Understanding kombucha tea fermentation: A review. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 580–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dufresne, C.; Farnworth, E. Tea, kombucha, and health: A review. Food Res. Int. 2000, 33, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pihurov, M.; Păcularu-Burada, B.; Cotârlet, M.; Vasile, M.A.; Bahrim, G.E. Novel Insights for Metabiotics Production by Using Artisanal Probiotic Cultures. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayabalan, R.; Malbasa, R.V.; Loncar, E.S.; Vitas, J.S.; Sathishkumar, M. A review on kombucha tea—Microbiology, composition, fermentation, and beneficial effects. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 538–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marsh, A.J.; O’Sullivan, O.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P.; Cotter, P.D. Sequence-based analysis of the bacterial and fungal compositions of multiple kombucha (tea fungus) samples. Food Microbiol. 2014, 38, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zendeboodi, F.; Khorshidian, N.; Mortazavian, A.M.; da Cruz, A.G. Probiotic: Conceptualization from a new approach. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2020, 32, 103–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolling, Y.; Salva, S.; Villena, J.; Marranzino, G.; Alvarez, S. Non-viable immunobiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus CRL1505 and its peptidoglycan improve systemic and respiratory innate immune response during recovery of immunocompromised-malnourished mice. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2015, 25, 474–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, F.; Morita, H.; Kubota, A.; Ouwehand, A.C.; Hosoda, M.; Hiramatsu, M.; Kurisaki, J.I. Effect of orally administered non-viable Lactobacillus cells on murine humoral immune responses. Microbiol. Immunol. 2005, 49, 993–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deshpande, G.; Athalye-Jape, G.; Patole, S. Para-probiotics for preterm neonates—The next frontier. Nutrients 2018, 10, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nataraj, B.H.; Ali, S.A.; Behare, P.V.; Yadav, H. Postbiotics-parabiotics: The new horizons in microbial biotherapy and functional foods. Microb. Cell Factories 2020, 19, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Diez-Ozaeta, I.; Astiazaran, O.J. Recent advances in Kombucha tea: Microbial consortium, chemical parameters, health implications and biocellulose production. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2022, 377, 109783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mousavi, S.M.; Hashemi, S.A.; Amani, A.M.; Esmaeili, H.; Ghasemi, Y.; Babapoor, A.; Mojoudi, F.; Arjomand, O. Pb (II) removal from synthetic wastewater using kombucha scoby and graphene oxide/Fe3O4. Phys. Chem. Res. 2018, 6, 759–771. [Google Scholar]
- Mousavi, S.M.; Hashemi, S.A.; Babapoor, A.; Savardashtaki, A.; Esmaeili, H.; Rahnema, Y.; Mojoudi, F.; Bahrani, S.; Jahandideh, S.; Asadi, M. Separation of Ni (II) from industrial wastewater by kombucha scoby as a colony consisted frombacteria and yeast: Kinetic and equilibrium studies. Acta Chim. Slov. 2019, 66, 865–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Najafpour, A.; Khorrami, A.R.; Azar, P.A.; Tehrani, M.S. Study of heavy metals biosorption by tea fungus in kombucha drink using central composite design. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2020, 86, 103359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basak, A.K.; AswathyMol, R.; Benzegar, A.; Agunde, R.; Dinakar, S. Absorption of anthocyanin dye and its first order kinetics on bacterial cellulose produced by fermentation of black tea. J. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2015, 1, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
- Aduri, P.; Rao, K.A.; Fatima, A.; Kaul, P.; Shalini, A. Study of biodegradable packaging material produced from scoby. Res. J. Life Sci. Bioinform. Pharm. Chem. Sci. 2019, 5, 389–405. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, C.; Bhardwaj, N.K. Fabrication of natural-origin antibacterial nanocellulose films using bio-extracts for potential use in biomedical industry. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 145, 914–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Wakil, N.A.; Hassan, E.A.; Hassan, M.L.; El-Salam, S.S.A. Bacterial cellulose/phytochemical’s extracts biocomposites for potential active wound dressings. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 26529–26541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, C.; Li, F.; Zhou, X.; Lin, L.; Zhang, T. Kombucha-synthesized bacterial cellulose: Preparation, characterization, and biocompatibility evaluation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2014, 102, 1548–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chan, C.K.; Shin, J.; Jiang, S.X.K. Development of tailor-shaped bacterial cellulose textile cultivation techniques for zero-waste design. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 2018, 36, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaminski, K.; Jarosz, M.; Grudzien, J.; Pawlik, J.; Zastawnik, F.; Pandyra, P.; Kołodziejczyk, A.M. Hydrogel bacterial cellulose: A path to improved materials for new eco-friendly textiles. Cellulose 2020, 27, 5353–5365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyhan, L.M.; Lynch, K.M.; Sahin, A.W.; Arendt, E.K. Advances in Kombucha Tea Fermentation: A Review. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 2, 73–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakravorty, S.; Bhattacharya, S.; Chatzinotas, A.; Chakraborty, W.; Bhattacharya, D.; Gachhui, R. Kombucha tea fermentation: Microbial and biochemical dynamics. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 220, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sievers, M.; Lanini, C.; Weber, A.; Schuler-Schmid, U.; Teuber, M. Microbiology and fermentation balance in a kombucha beverage obtained from a tea fungus fermentation. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1995, 18, 590–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freitas, A.; Sousa, P.; Wurlitzer, N. Alternative raw materials in kombucha production. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2022, 30, 100594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barros, V.C.; Botelho, V.A.; Chisté, R.C. Alternative Substrates for the Development of Fermented Beverages Analogous to Kombucha: An Integrative Review. Foods 2024, 13, 1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Antolak, H.; Piechota, D.; Kucharska, A. Kombucha Tea—A Double Power of Bioactive Compounds from Tea and Symbiotic Culture of Bacteria and Yeasts (SCOBY). Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villarreal-Soto, S.A.; Beaufort, S.; Bouajila, J.; Souch, J.P.; Renard, T.; Rollan, S.; Taillandier, P. Impact of fermentation conditions on the production of bioactive compounds with anticancer, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties in kombucha tea extracts. Process Biochem. 2019, 83, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chawla, P.R.; Bajaj, I.B.; Survase, S.A.; Singhal, R.S. Microbial cellulose: Fermentative production and applications. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2009, 47, 107–124. [Google Scholar]
- Mamlouk, D.; Gullo, M. Acetic acid bacteria: Physiology and carbon sources oxidation. Indian J. Microbiol. 2013, 53, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Laureys, D.; Britton, S.J.; De Clippeleer, J. Kombucha Tea Fermentation: A Review. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2020, 78, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Filippis, F.; Troise, A.D.; Vitaglione, P.; Ercolini, D. Different temperatures select distinctive acetic acid bacteria species and promotes organic acids production during kombucha tea fermentation. Food Microbiol. 2018, 73, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pei, J.; Jin, W.; Elaty, A.M.A.; Baranenko, D.A.; Gou, X.; Zhang, H.; Geng, J.; Jiang, L.; Chen, D.; Yue, T. Isolation, purification, and structural identification of a new bacteriocin made by Lactobacillus plantarum found in conventional kombucha. Food Control 2019, 110, 106923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sreeramulu, G.; Zhu, Y.; Knol, W. Characterization of Antimicrobial Activity in Kombucha Fermentation. Acta Biotechnol. 2001, 21, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franks, M.; Lawrence, P.; Abbaspourrad, A.; Dando, R. The Influence of Water Composition on Flavor and Nutrient Extraction in Green and Black Tea. Nutrients 2019, 11, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Greenwalt, C.; Ledford, R.; Steinkraus, K. Determination and Characterization of the Antimicrobial Activity of the Fermented Tea Kombucha. LWT 1998, 31, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimidi, E.; Cox, S.R.; Rossi, M.; Whelan, K. Fermented foods: Definitions and characteristics, impact on the gut microbiota and effects on gastrointestinal health and disease. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Yang, T.; Regenstein, J.M.; Zhou, P. Functional properties and sensory characteristics of kombucha analogs prepared with alternative materials. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 129, 608–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anantachoke, N.; Duangrat, R.; Sutthiphatkul, T.; Ochaikul, D.; Mangmool, S. Kombucha Beverages Produced from Fruits, Vegetables, and Plants: A Review on Their Pharmacological Activities and Health Benefits. Foods 2023, 12, 1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonarski, E.; Guimaraes, A.C.; Cesca, K.; Poletto, P. Production process and characteristics of kombucha fermented from alternative raw materials. Food Biosci. 2022, 49, 101841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gamboa-Gomez, C.I.; Gonzalez-Laredo, R.F.; Gallegos-Infante, J.A.; Perez, M.M.L.; Moreno-Jimenez, M.R.; Flores-Rueda, A.G.; Rocha-Guzman, N.E. Antioxidant and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory activity of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Litsea glaucescens infusions fermented with kombucha consortium. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2016, 54, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahmani, R.; Beaufort, S.; Villarreal-Soto, S.A.; Taillandier, P.; Bouajila, J.; Debouba, M. Kombucha fermentation of African mustard (Brassica tournefortii) leaves: Chemical composition and bioactivity. Food Biosci. 2019, 30, 100414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Četojević-Simin, D.D.; Velićanski, A.S.; Cvetković, D.D.; Markov, S.L.; Mrđanović, J.Ž.; Bogdanović, V.V.; Šolajić, S.V. Bioactivity of lemon balm kombucha. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012, 5, 1756–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vazquez-Cabral, B.D.; Rocha-Guzman, N.E.; Gallegos-Infante, J.A.; Gonzalez-Herrera, S.M.; Gonzalez-Laredo, R.F.; Moreno-Jimenez, M.R.; Cordova-Moreno, I.T.S. Chemical and sensory evaluation of a functional beverage obtained from infusions of oak leaves (Quercus resinosa) inoculated with the kombucha consortium under different processing conditions. Nutrafoods 2014, 13, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vazquez-Cabral, B.D.; Larrosa-Perez, M.; Gallegos-Infante, J.A.; Moreno-Jimenez, M.R.; Gonzalez-Laredo, R.F.; Rutiaga-Quinones, J.G.; Gamboa-Gomez, C.I.; Rocha-Guzman, N.E. Oak kombucha protects against oxidative stress and inflammatory processes. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2017, 272, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharifudin, S.A.; Ho, W.Y.; Yeap, S.K.; Abdullah, R.; Koh, S.P. Fermentation and characterisation of potential kombucha cultures on papaya-based substrates. LWT 2021, 151, 112060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, R.D.S.; Machado, M.R.G.; Barboza, G.; Soares, L.S.; Heberle, T.; Leivas, Y.M. Características Físicas e Químicas de Kombucha à base de chá de Hibisco (Hibiscus sabdariffa, L.); ANAIS do 6° Simposio de Segurança Alimentar: Gramado, Brazil, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Januário, J.B.; Moreira, B.R.; Paraiso, C.M.; Mizuta, A.G.; Madrona, G.S. Kombucha à base de Hibiscus sabdariffa L: Avaliação tecnológica para produção de uma nova bebida. Braz. J. Dev. 2020, 6, 3720–3732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, K.A.; Uekane, T.M.; de Miranda, J.F.; Ruiz, L.F.; da Motta, J.C.B.; Silva, C.B.; Silva, C.B.; de Souza Pitangui, N.; Gonzalez, A.G.M.; Fernandes, F.F.; et al. Kombucha beverage from non-conventional edible plant infusion and green tea: Characterization, toxicity, antioxidant activities and antimicrobial properties. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 34, 102032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majid, A.A.; Suroto, D.A.; Utami, T.; Rahayu, E.S. Probiotic potential of kombucha drink from butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea L.) flower with the addition of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum Dad-13. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2023, 51, 102776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abuduaibifu, A.; Tamer, C.E. Evaluation of physicochemical and bioaccessibility properties of goji berry kombucha. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2019, 43, e14077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayed, L.; Hamdi, M. Manufacture of a beverage from cactus pear juice using “tea fungus” fermentation. Ann. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 2293–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayed, L.; Abid, S.B.; Hamdi, M. Development of a beverage from red grape juice fermented with the Kombucha consortium. Ann. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonarski, E. Produção de Bebida Tipo Kombucha e Celulose Bacteriana Utilizando Subproduto da Acerola Como Matéria-Prima; Repositorio da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina: Florianópolis, Brazil, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Schroeder, J. Kombucha Fermentada A Partir de Resíduo de Acerola; Repositorio da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina: Florianópolis, Brazil, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Zubaidah, E.; Dewantari, F.J.; Novitasari, F.R.; Srianta, I.; Blanc, P.J. Potential of snake fruit (Salacca zalacca (Gaerth.) Voss) for the development of a beverage through fermentation with the Kombucha consortium. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 13, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watawana, M.I.; Jayawardena, N.; Gunawardhana, C.B.; Waisundara, V.Y. Enhancement of the antioxidant and starch hydrolase inhibitory activities of king coconut water (Cocos nucifera var. aurantiaca) by fermentation with kombucha “tea fungus”. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, R.F.; Hikal, M.S.; Abou-Taleb, K.A. Biological, chemical and antioxidant activities of different types Kombucha. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2020, 65, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Francisco, A.R.; de la Jose, R.M.; Igor, H. Development of a no added sugar kombucha beverage based on germinated corn. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2021, 24, 100355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, T.Y.; Li, J.S.; Chen, C. Effects of blending wheatgrass juice on enhancing phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of traditional kombucha beverage. J. Food Drug Anal. 2015, 23, 709–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aspiyanto; Susilowati, A.; Iskandar, J.M.; Melanie, H.; Maryati, Y.; Lotulung, P.D. Characteristic of fermented spinach (Amaranthus spp.) polyphenol by kombucha culture for antioxidant compound. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1803, 020018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melanie, H.; Susilowati, A.; Maryati, Y.; Lotulung, P.D. Fermentation of spinach (Amaranthus spp.) and broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.) using kombucha culture as natural source of folic acid for functional food. IPTEK J. Proc. Ser. 2017, 3, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulusoy, A.; Tamer, C.E. Determination of suitability of black carrot (Daucus carota L. spp. sativus var. atrorubens Alef.) juice concentrate, cherry laurel (Prunus laurocerasus), blackthorn (Prunus spinosa) and red raspberry (Rubus ideaus) for kombucha beverage production. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2019, 13, 1524–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watawana, M.I.; Jayawardena, N.; Waisundara, V.Y. Enhancement of the functional properties of coffee through fermentation by “tea fungus” (kombucha). J. Food Process. Preserv. 2015, 39, 2596–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nizioł-Łukaszewska, Z.; Ziemlewska, A.; Bujak, T.; Zagórska-Dziok, M.; Zarebska, M.; Hordyjewicz-Baran, Z.; Wasilewski, T. Effect of fermentation time on antioxidant and anti-ageing properties of green coffee kombucha ferments. Molecules 2020, 25, 5394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tanticharakunsiri, W.; Mangmool, S.; Wongsariya, K.; Ochaikul, D. Characteristics and upregulation of antioxidant enzymes of kitchen mint and oolong tea kombucha beverages. J. Food Biochem. 2021, 45, e13574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamer, C.E.; Temel, S.G.; Suna, S.; Karabacak, A.O. Evaluation of bioaccessibility tand functional properties of kombucha beverages fortified with different medicinal plant extracts. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2021, 45, 13–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziemlewska, A.; Nizioł-Łukaszewska, Z.; Bujak, T.; Zagorska-Dziok, M.; Wojciak, M.; Sowa, I. Effect of fermentation time on the content of bioactive compounds with cosmetic and dermatological properties in Kombucha Yerba Mate extracts. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 18792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaggìa, F.; Baffoni, L.; Galiano, M.; Nielsen, D.S.; Jakobsen, R.R.; Castro-Mejía, J.L.; Bosi, S.; Truzzi, F.; Musumeci, F.; Dinelli, G.; et al. Kombucha Beverage from Green, Black and Rooibos Teas: A Comparative Study Looking at Microbiology, Chemistry and Antioxidant Activity. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, C.; Li, R.Y.; Chen, J.X.; Wang, F.; Gao, Y.; Fu, Y.Q.; Xu, Y.Q.; Yin, J.F. Zijuan tea-based kombucha: Physicochemical, sensorial, and antioxidant profile. Food Chem. 2021, 363, 130322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopes, D.R. Obtenção e Avaliação de Extratos de Erva Mate (Ilex paraguariensis) Fermentados Com A Cultura Simbiótica Kombucha/Danielle Rubim Lopes; Repositorio FURG: Rio Grande, Brazil, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Vitas, J.S.; Cvetanović, A.D.; Mašković, P.Z.; Švarc-Gajić, J.V.; Malbaša, R.V. Chemical composition and biological activity of novel types of kombucha beverages with yarrow. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 44, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barros, V.C.; Freitas, A.C. Biotecnología Alimentaria: Desarrollo de Nuevos Productos, 1st ed.; Editorial Académica Española: Beau Bassin, Mauritius, 2021; Volume 1, 84p. [Google Scholar]
- Zubaidah, E.; Khilyatun, Y.; Susanti, I.; Dewanti, T. Turmeric Kombucha as effective immunomodulator in Salmonella typhi- infected experimental animals. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 37, 4–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahbazi, H.; Hashemi Gahruie, H.; Golmakani, M.T.; Eskandari, M.H.; Movahedi, M. Effect of medicinal plant type and concentration on physicochemical, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and sensorial properties of kombucha. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 2568–2577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pure, A.E.; Mofidi, S.M.G.; Keyghobadi, F.; Pure, M.E. Chemical composition of garlic fermented in red grape vinegar and kombucha. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 34, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kruk, M.; Trzaskowska, M.; Scibisz, I.; Pokorski, P. Application of the “SCOBY” and kombucha tea for the production of fermented milk drinks. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hrnjez, D.; Vastag, Ž.; Milanovic, S.; Vukic, V.; Ilicic, M.; Popovic, L.; Kanuric, K. The biological activity of fermented dairy products obtained by kombucha and conventional starter cultures during storage. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 10, 336–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belloso-Morales, G.; Humberto, H.-S. Manufacture of a Beverage from Cheese Whey Using a Tea Fungus Fermentation; Revista Latinoamericana de Microbiologia: Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico, 2003; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
- Augusta, P.; Nurkolis, F.; Noor, S.; Permatasari, H.; Hardinsyah; Taslim, N.; Batubara, S.; Mayulu, N.; Wewengkang, D.; Rotinsulu, H. Probiotic beverage: The potential of anti-diabetes within kombucha tea made from sea grapes (Ceulerpa racemosa) containing high antioxidant and polyphenol total. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2021, 80, 2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aung, T.; Eun, J.-B. Production and characterization of a novel beverage from laver (Porphyra dentata) through fermentation with kombucha consortium. Food Chem. 2021, 350, 129274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aung, T.; Eun, J.-B. Impact of time and temperature on the physicochemical, microbiological, and nutraceutical properties of laver kombucha (Porphyra dentata) during fermentation. LWT–Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 154, 112643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhialdin, B.J.; Osman, F.A.; Muhamad, R.; Wan Sapawi, C.W.N.S.C.; Anzian, A.; Voon, W.W.Y.; Hussin, A.S.M. Effects of sugar sources and fermentation time on the properties of tea fungus (kombucha) beverage. Int. Food Res. J. 2019, 26, 481–487. [Google Scholar]
- Watawana, M.I.; Jayawardena, N.; Ranasinghe, S.J.; Waisundara, V.Y. Evaluation of the effect of different sweetening agents on the polyphenol contents and antioxidant and starch hydrolase inhibitory properties of kombucha. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2017, 41, e12752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Battikh, H.; Bakhrouf, A.; Ammar, E. Antimicrobial effect of Kombucha analogues. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Van Mullem, J.; Dias, D.R.; Schwan, R.F. The chemistry and sensory characteristics of new herbal tea-based kombuchas. J. Food Sci. 2021, 86, 740–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xia, X.; Dai, Y.; Wu, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Yin, L.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Zhou, J. Kombucha fermentation enhances the health-promoting properties of soymilk beverage. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 62, 103549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, C.; Tang, S.; Azi, F.; Hu, W.; Dong, M. Use of kombucha consortium to transform soy whey into a novel functional beverage. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 52, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhiwen, W.; Yijiao, S.; Xianhua, M.; Kai, L.; Fahu, Y. Production and characterization of a novel beverage from maize silk through fermentation with kombucha consortium. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 792, 012053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargas, B.K.; Fabricio, M.F.; Ayub, M.A.Z. Health effects and probiotic and prebiotic potential of Kombucha: A bibliometric and systematic review. Food Biosci. 2021, 44, 101332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leal, J.M.; Suárez, L.V.; Jayabalan, R.; Oros, J.H.; Escalante-Aburto, A. A review on health benefits of kombucha nutritional compounds and metabolites. CyTA J. Food 2018, 16, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neffe-Skocinska, K.; Rzepkowska, A.; Szydłowska, A.; Kołozyn-Krajewska, D. Chapter 3—Trends and Possibilities of the Use of Probiotics in Food Production. In Handbook of Food Bioengineering, Alternative and Replacement Foods; Holban, A.M., Grumezescu, A.M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 65–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salminen, S.; Collado, M.C.; Endo, A.; Hill, C.; Lebeer, S.; Quigley, E.M.M.; Sanders, M.E.; Shamir, R.; Swann, J.R.; Szajewska, H.; et al. The International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of postbiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 18, 649–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fabricio, M.F.; Mann, M.B.; Kothe, C.I.; Frazzon, J.; Tischer, B.; Flores, S.H.; Ayub, M.A.Z. Effect of freeze-dried kombucha culture on microbial composition and assessment of metabolic dynamics during fermentation. Food Microbiol. 2022, 101, 103889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Liu, B.Y. Changes in major components of tea fungus metabolites during prolonged fermentation. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 89, 834–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, N.K.; Nguyen, P.B.; Nguyen, H.T.; Le, P.H. Screening the optimal ratio of symbiosis between isolated yeast and acetic acid bacteria strain from traditional kombucha for high-level production of glucuronic acid. LWT 2015, 64, 1149–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayabalan, R.; Marimuthu, S.; Swaminathan, K. Changes in content of organic acids and tea polyphenols during Kombucha tea fermentation. Food Chem. 2007, 102, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loncar, E.; Djuric, M.; Malbaša, R.; Kolarov, L.J.; Klašnja, M. Influence of Working Conditions Upon Kombucha Conducted Fermentation of Black Tea. Food Bioprod. Process. 2006, 84, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z.J.; Sui, Y.C.; Wu, H.W.; Zhou, C.B.; Hu, X.C.; Zhang, J. Flavour chemical dynamics during fermentation of kombucha tea. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2018, 30, 732–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khaleil, M.M. A bioprocess development study of polyphenol profile, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of kombucha enriched with Psidium guajava L. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2020, 9, 1204–1210. Available online: https://office2.jmbfs.org/index.php/JMBFS/article/view/4505 (accessed on 25 July 2025). [CrossRef]
- Bauer-Petrovska, B.; Petrushevska-Tozi, L. Mineral and water soluble vitamin content in the Kombucha drink. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2000, 35, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jakubczyk, K.; Kałdunska, J.; Kochman, J.; Janda, K. Chemical profile and antioxidant activity of the kombucha beverage derived from white, green, black and red tea. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaewkod, T.; Bovonsombut, S.; Tragoolpua, Y. Efficacy of kombucha obtained from green, oolong and black teas on inhibition of pathogenic bacteria, antioxidation, and toxicity on colorectal cancer cell line. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, K.; Gan, X.; Tang, X.; Wang, S.; Tan, H. Determination of d-saccharic acid-1,4-lactone from brewed kombucha broth by high-performance capillary electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2010, 878, 371–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hassler, V.; Brand, N.; Wefers, D. Isolation and characterization of exopolysaccharides from kombucha samples of different origins. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 267, 131377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larini, I.; Tintori, S.; Gatto, V.; Felis, G.E.; Salvetti, E.; Torriani, S. Comparative genomics reveals the potential biotechnological applications of Liquorilactobacillus nagelii VUCC-R001, a strain isolated from kombucha tea. Food Biosci. 2024, 59, 104001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.S.; Vieira, V.B.; Costa, A.C.S.; Silva, A.V.; Mendonça, A.A.; Morais, M.A., Jr.; Santos, D.S.; Torres, A.G.; Maciel, M.I.S.; Azevedo, E.P.P. Accumulation of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate and other bioactive compounds, in the course of fermentation of green tea (Camellia sinensis) kombucha. Heliyon 2024, 10, e32809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakravorty, S.; Bhattacharya, S.; Bhattacharya, D.; Sarkar, S.; Gachhui, R. Kombucha: A promising functional beverage prepared from tea, Non-alcoholic Beverages. In The Science of Beverages; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zubaidah, E.; Apriyadi, T.E.; Kalsum, U.; Widyastuti, E.; Estiasih, T.; Srianta, I.; Blanc, P.J. In vivo evaluation of snake fruit Kombucha as hyperglycemia therapeutic agent. Int. Food Res. J. 2018, 25, 453–457. [Google Scholar]
- Canete-Rodríguez, A.M.; Santos-Duenas, I.M.; Jimenez-Hornero, J.E.; Ehrenreich, A.; Liebl, W.; García-García, I. Gluconic acid: Properties, production methods and applications—An excellent opportunity for agro-industrial by-products and waste bio-valorization. Process Biochem. 2016, 51, 1891–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomes, R.J.; Borges, M.F.; Rosa, M.F.; Castro-Gómez, H.R.J.; Spinosa, W.A. Acetic Acid Bacteria in the Food Industry: Systematics, Characteristics and Applications. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 56, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coelho, R.M.D.; de Almeida, A.L.; do Amaral, R.Q.G.; da Mota, R.N.; de Sousa, P.H.M. Kombucha: Review. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2020, 22, 100272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, T.; Grandvalet, C.; Verdier, F.; Martin, A.; Alexandre, H.; Tourdot-Marechal, R. Microbial dynamics between yeasts and acetic acid bacteria in kombucha: Impacts on the chemical composition of the beverage. Foods 2020, 9, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martínez-Leal, J.; Ponce-García, N.; Escalante-Aburto, A. Recent evidence of the beneficial effects associated with glucuronic acid contained in kombucha beverages. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2020, 9, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vina, I.; Semjonovs, P.; Linde, R.; Denina, I. Current Evidence on Physiological Activity and Expected Health Effects of Kombucha Fermented Beverage. J. Med. Food 2014, 17, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsao, R. Chemistry and biochemistry of dietary polyphenols. Nutrients 2010, 2, 1231–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Helliwell, K. Determination of flavonols in green and black tea leaves and green tea infusions by high-performance liquid chromatography. Food Res. Int. 2001, 34, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayabalan, R.; Subathradevi, P.; Marimuthu, S.; Sathishkumar, M.; Swaminathan, K. Changes in free-radical scavenging ability of kombucha tea during fermentation. Food Chem. 2008, 109, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardoso, R.R.; Neto, R.O.; Dos Santos D’Almeida, C.T.; Nascimento, T.; Pressete, C.G.; Azevedo, L.; Martino, H.S.D.; Cameron, L.C.; Ferreira, M.S.L.; de Barros, F.A.R. Kombuchas from green and black teas have different phenolic profile, which impacts their antioxidant capacities, antibacterial and antiproliferative activities. Food Res. Int. 2020, 128, 108782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Noronha, M.C.; Cardoso, R.R.; dos Santos D’Almeida, C.T.; Vieira do Carmo, M.A.; Azevedo, L.; Maltarollo, V.G.; Júnior, J.I.R.; Eller, M.R.; Cameron, L.C.; Ferreira, M.S.L.; et al. Black tea kombucha: Physicochemical, microbiological and comprehensive phenolic profile changes during fermentation, and antimalarial activity. Food Chem. 2022, 384, 132515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jafari, R.; Naghavi, N.S.; Khosravi-Darani, K.; Doudi, M.; Shahanipour, K. Kombucha microbial starter with enhanced production of antioxidant compounds and invertase. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 29, 101789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, D.D.; Saimaiti, A.; Luo, M.; Huang, S.Y.; Xiong, R.G.; Shang, A.; Gan, R.Y.; Li, H.B. Fermentation with tea residues enhances antioxidant activities and polyphenol contents in kombucha beverages. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Y.-Q.; Zou, C.; Gao, Y.; Chen, J.X.; Wang, F.; Chen, G.-S.; Yin, J.-F. Effect of the type of brewing water on the chemical composition, sensory quality and antioxidant capacity of Chinese teas. Food Chem. 2017, 236, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ananingsih, V.K.; Sharma, A.; Zhou, W. Green tea catechins during food processing and storage: A review on stability and detection. Food Res. Int. 2013, 50, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wani, A.L.; Ara, A.; Usmani, J.A. Lead toxicity: A review. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2015, 8, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Health Organization. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 2nd ed.; Health criteria and other supporting information; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1996; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Z.; Zhou, F.; Ji, B.; Li, B.; Luo, Y.; Yang, L.; Li, T. Symbiosis between microorganisms from kombucha and kefir: Potential significance to the enhancement of kombucha function. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 160, 446–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, X.; Yang, S.; Liu, Y.; Ren, K.; Tian, T.; Tong, X.; Dai, S.; Lyu, B.; Yu, A.; Wang, H.; et al. Application of kombucha combined with fructo-oligosaccharides in soy milk: Colony composition, antioxidant capacity, and flavor relationship. Food Biosci. 2023, 53, 102527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neffe-Skocińska, K.; Długosz, E.; Szulc-Dąbrowska, L.; Zielińska, D. Novel Gluconobacter oxydans strains selected from Kombucha with potential postbiotic activity. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 108, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Verdier, J.R.R.F.; Tran, T.; Martin, A.; Aumeunier, A.; Alexandre, H.; Rieu, A.; Tourdot-Marechal, R.; Grandvalet, C. Exploring the role of production and release of proteins for microbial interactions in kombucha. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 198, 116016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chong, A.Q.; Lau, S.W.; Chin, N.L.; Talib, R.A.; Basha, R.K. Fermented Beverage Benefits: A Comprehensive Review and Comparison of Kombucha and Kefir Microbiome. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dudikova, G.N.; Kuznetsova, E.S.; Butyrkina, N.P.P.T.I. Consortium of Microorganisms Lactobacillus Paracasei 2, Lactobacillus pontis 67, Pedicoccus Acidilactici P1-6, Saccharomyces Cerevisiae LV Used to Prepare Rye Bread Starter. Patent Number 27332, 16 September 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Ponomarova, O.; Gabrielli, N.; Sévin, D.C.; Sauer, U.; Ralser, M.; Raosaheb Patil, K. Yeast Creates a Niche for Symbiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria through Nitrogen Overflow. Cell Syst. 2017, 5, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senne de Oliveira Lino, F.; Bajic, D.; Vila, J.C.C.; Sánchez, A.; Sommer, M.O.A. Complex yeast–bacteria interactions affect the yield of industrial ethanol fermentation. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamed, Y.S.; Abdin, M.; Rayan, A.M.; Akhtar, H.M.S.; Zeng, X. Synergistic inhibition of isolated flavonoids from Moringa oleifera leaf on α-glucosidase activity. LWT 2021, 141, 111081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salama, M.A.; El Harkaoui, S.; Nounah, I.; Sakr, H.; Abdin, M.; Owon, M.; Osman, M.; Ibrahim, A.; Charrouf, Z.; Matthaus, B. Oxidative stability of Opuntia ficus-indica seeds oil blending with Moringa oleifera seeds oil. OCL 2020, 27, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaiserman, A.; Koliada, A.; Zayachkivska, A.; Lushchak, O. Nanodelivery of natural antioxidants: An anti-aging perspective. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 7, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verrillo, M.; Salzano, M.; Cozzolino, V.; Spaccini, R.; Piccolo, A. Bioactivity and antimicrobial properties of chemically characterized compost teas from different green composts. Waste Manag. 2021, 120, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharya, D.; Bhattacharya, S.; Patra, M.M.; Chakravorty, S.; Sarkar, S.; Chakraborty, W.; Koley, H.; Gachhui, R. Antibacterial Activity of Polyphenolic Fraction of Kombucha Against Enteric Bacterial Pathogens. Curr. Microbiol. 2016, 73, 885–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taupiqurrohman, O.; Hastuti, L.P.; Oktavia, D.; Al-Najjar, B.O.; Yusuf, M.; Suryani, Y.; Gaffar, S. From fermentation to cancer prevention: The anticancer potential of Kombucha. Phytomedicine Plus 2024, 4, 100633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghandehari, S.; Goodarzi, M.T.; Nia, J.I.; Tabrizi, M.H. Evaluation of cytotoxicity, apoptosis, and angiogenesis induced by kombucha extract-loaded PLGA nanoparticles in human ovarian cancer cell line (A2780). Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2022, 13, 13103–13115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Batista, P.; Rodrigues Penas, M.; Vila-Real, C.; Pintado, M.; Oliveira-Silva, P. Kombucha: Challenges for Health and Mental Health. Foods 2023, 12, 3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grondalska, J.; Kolniak-Ostek, J. Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory, Antidiabetic, Antioxidant, and Anticholinergic Activities, as Well as Chemical Composition and Polyphenolic Compounds in Novel SCOBY-Fermented Juices. Molecules 2025, 30, 1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kartelias, I.G.; Karantonis, H.C.; Giaouris, E.; Panagiotakopoulos, I.; Nasopoulou, C. Kombucha Fermentation of Olympus Mountain Tea (Sideritis scardica) Sweetened with Thyme Honey: Physicochemical Analysis and Evaluation of Functional Properties. Foods 2023, 12, 3496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kartelias, I.G.; Panagiotakopoulos, I.; Nasopoulou, C.; Karantonis, H.C. Evaluating the Effect of Adding Selected Herbs, Spices, and Fruits to Fermented Olympus Mountain Tea (Sideritis scardica) Kombucha Sweetened with Thyme Honey: Assessment of Physicochemical and Functional Properties. Beverages 2024, 10, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Keogh, J.B.; Clifton, P.M. Polyphenols and Glycemic Control. Nutrients 2016, 8, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mouguech, N.; Taillandier, P.; Bouajila, J.; Romdhane, M.; Etteyeb, N. Enhanced Biological Potential and Phytochemical Profiling of Phoenix Dactylifera Leaves (Deglet Nour and Alig) by Kombucha Fermentation: Focus on Polyphenols, Antioxidant, Antidiabetic, and Cytotoxic Activities. Chem. Biodivers. 2025, 22, e202401592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adams, D.; Donovan, J.; Topple, C. Sustainability in large food and beverage companies and their supply chains: An investigation into key drivers and barriers affecting sustainability strategies. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2023, 32, 1451–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabatini, F.; Maresca, E.; Aulitto, M.; Termopoli, V.; De Risi, A.; Correggia, M.; Fiorentino, G.; Consonni, V.; Gosetti, F.; Orlandi, M.; et al. Exploiting agri-food residues for kombucha tea and bacterial cellulose production. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 302, 140293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Oliveira, P.V.; da Silva Júnior, A.H.; de Oliveira, C.R.S.; Assumpção, C.F.; Ogeda, C.H. Kombucha benefits, risks and regulatory frameworks: A review. Food Chem. Adv. 2023, 2, 100288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bortolomedi, B.M.; Paglarini, C.S.; Brod, F.C.A. Bioactive compounds in kombucha: A review of substrate effect and fermentation conditions. Food Chem. 2022, 385, 132719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selvaraj, S.; Gurumurthy, K. Metagenomic, organoleptic profiling, and nutritional properties of fermented kombucha tea substituted with recycled substrates. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1367697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Adhikari, K. Current Trends in Kombucha: Marketing Perspectives and the Need for Improved Sensory Research. Beverages 2020, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, B.X.N.; Phan Van, T.; Phan, Q.K.; Pham, G.B.; Quang, H.P.; Do, A.D. Coffee Husk By-Product as Novel Ingredients for Cascara Kombucha Production. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 34, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanwal, N.; Gupta, A.; Bareen, M.A.; Sharma, N.; Sahu, J.K. Kombucha fermentation: Recent trends in process dynamics, functional bioactivities, toxicity management, and potential applications. Food Chem. Adv. 2023, 3, 100421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazzaroli, C.; Sordini, B.; Daidone, L.; Veneziani, G.; Esposto, S.; Urbani, S.; Selvaggini, R.; Servili, M.; Taticchi, A. Recovery and valorization of food industry by-products through the application of Olea europaea L. leaves in kombucha tea manufacturing. Food Biosci. 2023, 53, 102551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, L.d.M.; Roselino, M.N.; Alves, J.d.C.; Viana, S.N.A.; dos Reis Requião, E.; dos Santos Ferro, J.M.R.B.; de Souza, C.O.; Ribeiro, C.D.F. Production and characterization of kombucha-like beverage by cocoa (Theobroma cacao) by-product as raw material. Future Foods 2025, 11, 100528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, Í.A.C.L.d.; Rolim, V.A.d.O.; Gaspar, R.P.L.; Rossini, D.Q.; de Souza, R.; Bogsan, C.S.B. The Technological Perspectives of Kombucha and Its Implications for Production. Fermentation 2022, 8, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, J.; Tan, Q.; Tang, Q.; Tong, Z.; Yang, M. Research progress on alternative kombucha substrate transformation and the resulting active components. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1254014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angela, C.; Young, J.; Kordayanti, S.; Devanthi, P.V.P. Isolation and Screening of Microbial Isolates from Kombucha Culture for Bacterial Cellulose Production in Sugarcane Molasses Medium. KnE Life Sci. 2020, 5, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morales, D.; Gutiérrez-Pensado, R.; Bravo, F.I.; Muguerza, B. Novel kombucha beverages with antioxidant activity based on fruits as alternative substrates. LWT 2023, 189, 115482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cubas, A.L.V.; Provin, A.P.; Dutra, A.R.A.; Mouro, C.; Gouveia, I.C. Advances in the Production of Biomaterials through Kombucha Using Food Waste: Concepts, Challenges, and Potential. Polymers 2023, 15, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojo, A.O.; de Smidt, O. Microbial Composition, Bioactive Compounds, Potential Benefits and Risks Associated with Kombucha: A Concise Review. Fermentation 2023, 9, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Technavio. Kombucha Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025–2029: North America (US and Canada), Europe (France, Germany, Italy, and UK), Middle East and Africa (Egypt, KSA, Oman, and UAE), APAC (China, India, and Japan), South America (Argentina and Brazil), and Rest of World (ROW). Available online: https://www.technavio.com/report/kombucha-market-industry-analysis (accessed on 17 November 2025).
- Jayalath, M.M.; Perera, H.N.; Ratnayake, R.M.C.; Thibbotuwawa, A. Harvesting sustainability: Transforming traditional agri-food supply chains with circular economy in developing economies. Clean. Waste Syst. 2025, 11, 100264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villarreal Sotto, S.; Beaufort, S.; Caceres, I.; Barakat, N.; Bouajila, J.; Taillandier, P. Kombucha: An example of symbiotic microbial culture with many potential. In Proceedings of the XXIII Congreso Nacional de Microbiología de los Alimentos, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain, 9–12 September 2024. [Google Scholar]
- May, A.; Narayanan, S.; Alcock, J.; Varsani, A.; Maley, C.; Aktipis, A. Kombucha: A novel model system for cooperation and conflict in a complex multi-species microbial ecosystem. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Provin, A.P.; de Aguiar Dutra, A.R. Circular economy for fashion industry: Use of waste from the food industry for the production of biotextiles. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2021, 169, 120858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayalakshmi, T.; Gayathry, G.; Kumutha, K.; Sabarinathan, K.; Amutha, R.; Veeramani, P. Plausible Avenues and Applications of Bioformulations from Symbiotic Culture of Bacteria and Yeast. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2024, 18, 1489–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guevara, K.M.; Martínez-Valenzuela, G.; Sánchez-Vásquez, V.; Guerrero-Ruiz, K.; Fiallos-Cárdenas, M. Trends and perspectives on bacterial nanocellulose: A comprehensive analysis from the three helixes of innovation. Mater. Today Sustain. 2025, 30, 101090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mat Zin Boestami, R.; Kamari, A.; Eli, R.; Budi, H. Production of Kombucha SCOBY Cellulose by Using Tea and Pumpkin Peel Waste as Fermentation Substrates: A Comparison Study. J. Sci. Math. Lett. 2024, 12, 119–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, L.N.; Lima, M.d.; Schmidt, V.C.R. Physical and chemical treatments in obtaining and purifying Kombucha SCOBY Cellulose. Obs. Econ. Latinoam. 2024, 22, e6622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryszewska, M.A.; Tabandeh, E.; Jędrasik, J.; Czarnecka, M.; Dzierżanowska, J.; Ludwicka, K. SCOBY Cellulose Modified with Apple Powder—Biomaterial with Functional Characteristics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radadiya, B.; Singh, M.; Maitreya, B. Study of Leather Alternative from Bacterial Cellulose—A Review. Vidya—A J. Gujarat Univ. 2022, 1, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mokashi, A.; Harale, P.; Chougule, S.; Firodiya, R.; Gandhi, S.; Chougule, A. Vegan Leather from Kombucha Tea and Scoby. Medicon Eng. Themes 2022, 3, 70–75. [Google Scholar]
- Gala, P.; Pandya, B. Sustainable Eco-Friendly Vegan Bioleather. Int. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Commun. Technol. 2022, 2, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koreshkov, M.; Takatsuna, Y.; Bismarck, A.; Fritz, I.; Reimhult, E.; Zirbs, R. Sustainable food packaging using modified kombucha-derived bacterial cellulose nanofillers in biodegradable polymers. RSC Sustain. 2024, 2, 2367–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eggensperger, C.G.; Giagnorio, M.; Holland, M.C.; Dobosz, K.M.; Schiffman, J.D.; Tiraferri, A.; Zodrow, K.R. Sustainable Living Filtration Membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2020, 7, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, C.; Zeller, V. Nutrient circularity from waste to fertilizer: A perspective from LCA studies. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 965, 178623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krungkaew, S.; Hülsemann, B.; Kingphadung, K.; Mahayothee, B.; Oechsner, H.; Müller, J. New Sustainable Banana Value Chain: Waste Valuation toward a Circular Bioeconomy. Energies 2023, 16, 3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SungHee Kole, A.; Jones, H.D.; Christensen, R.; Gladstein, J. A Case of Kombucha Tea Toxicity. J. Intensive Care Med. 2009, 24, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sannapaneni, S.; Philip, S.; Desai, A.; Mitchell, J.; Feldman, M. Kombucha-Induced Massive Hepatic Necrosis: A Case Report and a Review of Literature. Gastro Hep Adv. 2023, 2, 196–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srinivasan, R.; Smolinske, S.; Greenbaum, D. Probable Gastrointestinal Toxicity of Kombucha Tea: Is This Beverage Healthy or Harmful? J. Gen. Intern. Med. 1997, 12, 643–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Derk, C.T.; Sandorfi, N.; Curtis, M.T. A Case of Anti-Jo1 Myositis with Pleural Effusions and Pericardial Tamponade Developing after Exposure to a Fermented Kombucha Beverage. Clin. Rheumatol. 2004, 23, 355–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, K.Y.J.; Chen, Y.Y.; Chia, W.Z.J.; Lim, M.Y.; Sutjipto, S. A Rare Case of Salmonella Enteritidis Sinusitis. Cureus 2024, 16, e75504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabouraud, S.; Coppéré, B.; Rousseau, C.; Testud, F.; Pulce, C.; Tholly, F.; Blanc, M.; Culoma, F.; Facchin, A.; Ninet, J.; et al. Environmental lead poisoning from lead-glazed earthenware used for storing drinks. Rev. Médecine Interne 2009, 30, 1038–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phan, T.G.; Estell, J.; Duggin, G.; Beer, I.; Smith, D.; Ferson, M.J. Lead Poisoning from Drinking Kombucha Tea Brewed in a Ceramic Pot. Med. J. Aust. 1998, 169, 644–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Miranda, J.F.; Ruiz, L.F.; Silva, C.B.; Uekane, T.M.; Silva, K.A.; Gonzalez, A.G.M.; Fernandes, F.F.; Lima, A.R. Kombucha: A Review of Substrates, Regulations, Composition, and Biological Properties. J. Food Sci. 2022, 87, 503–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McIntyre, L.; Trmčić, A.; Paphitis, K.; Parto, N. The Fermented Foods working group Safety of Fermented Foods. Assessing Risks in Fermented Food Processing Practices and Advice on How to Mitigate Them. Section 3.6 Yogurt 2023. Environmental Health Services, BC Centre for Disease Control. December 2024. Available online: http://bccdc.ca/resource-gallery/Documents/Educational%20Materials/EH/FPS/Food/Fermented/Fermented%20Foods%20Guidance%20-%203.6%20Yogurt.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2025).
- Claeys, W.L.; Cardoen, S.; Daube, G.; De Block, J.; Dewettinck, K.; Dierick, K.; De Zutter, L.; Huyghebaert, A.; Imberechts, H.; Thiange, P.; et al. Raw or Heated Cow Milk Consumption: Review of Risks and Benefits. Food Control 2013, 31, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brasil. Instrução Normativa No. 41. (Normative Instruction No. 41). Diário Oficial da União, September 17, 2019. Section 1, page 13. Available online: https://kombuchabrewers.org/brazil/ (accessed on 15 August 2025).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).