Next Article in Journal
Continual-Learning-Enhanced CNN–Transformer Framework for Real-Time Motor-Imagery BCI in Virtual Environments
Previous Article in Journal
CT-to-PET Synthesis in the Head–Neck and Thoracic Region via Conditional 3D Latent Diffusion Modeling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Systematic Review

Robot-Assisted Gravity Compensation for Upper Limb Motor Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review

by
Rodrigo Mendez
1,2,*,
Claudia Simon Rueda
1 and
Rui C. V. Loureiro
1,3
1
Aspire Centre for Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology, University College London, London HA7 4LP, UK
2
Departamento de Electronica e Informatica, Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria, Concepcion 4030000, Chile
3
National Rehabilitation Centre, Stanford Hall Estate, Loughborough LE12 5GF, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2026, 13(5), 535; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13050535
Submission received: 24 March 2026 / Revised: 27 April 2026 / Accepted: 28 April 2026 / Published: 5 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials)

Abstract

Neurological disorders often cause severe upper limb motor impairments that restrict independence and quality of life. Robot-assisted rehabilitation enables high-intensity, task-oriented, and quantifiable training. One key feature, gravity compensation (GC), reduces the muscular effort needed to lift the limb and supports voluntary movement by offsetting the weight of the arm. This systematic review aimed to identify the types of GC strategies used in upper limb rehabilitation robots and assess clinical evidence on their effectiveness for improving motor outcomes. A search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore (January 2005–May 2025) identified 60 eligible studies: 23 describing GC implementation and 40 reporting clinical results. GC was implemented into exoskeletons, end-effectors, and sling-suspension systems through passive mechanical designs or active, model-based, and adaptive control algorithms. However, few studies reported key technical parameters such as controller algorithms, loop frequency, or tuning procedures, and only one addressed the control system stability. Clinically, GC-assisted training improved arm movement and range of motion, with greater effects in participants with higher impairment levels. However, the functional gains were modest and not superior to conventional or other robotic therapies. Substantial heterogeneity in training protocols and participants’ demographics further limits direct comparison among GC strategies. Overall, the relative effectiveness of robot-assisted GC across devices remains unclear. Standardized reporting and more clinical trials are needed to compare GC strategies within and between different types of robots.
Keywords: rehabilitation robotics; gravity compensation; upper limbs; neurological disorders rehabilitation robotics; gravity compensation; upper limbs; neurological disorders

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mendez, R.; Rueda, C.S.; Loureiro, R.C.V. Robot-Assisted Gravity Compensation for Upper Limb Motor Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review. Bioengineering 2026, 13, 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13050535

AMA Style

Mendez R, Rueda CS, Loureiro RCV. Robot-Assisted Gravity Compensation for Upper Limb Motor Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review. Bioengineering. 2026; 13(5):535. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13050535

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mendez, Rodrigo, Claudia Simon Rueda, and Rui C. V. Loureiro. 2026. "Robot-Assisted Gravity Compensation for Upper Limb Motor Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review" Bioengineering 13, no. 5: 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13050535

APA Style

Mendez, R., Rueda, C. S., & Loureiro, R. C. V. (2026). Robot-Assisted Gravity Compensation for Upper Limb Motor Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review. Bioengineering, 13(5), 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13050535

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop