An Injectable, Osteoconductive Gelatin-Enabled GelMA/HAp Hydrogel Scaffold for Minimally Invasive Bone Tissue Engineering
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemicals and Reagents
2.2. Synthesis of HAp
2.3. Preparation of Dual-Gel/HAp Hydrogels
2.4. Characterization of Hydrogels
2.5. Cell Isolation and Culture of Rat BMSCs
2.6. Live/Dead Staining Assay
2.7. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) Assay
2.8. ALP Staining and Activity Assay
2.9. ARS Staining and Quantification
2.10. Immunofluorescence Staining
2.11. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR)
2.12. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Construction of a Dual-Gel/HAp Injectable Paste with Enhanced Thixotropy and Shape Retention
3.2. Gelatin-Reinforced Dual-Gel/HAp Hydrogels Exhibit Enhanced Viscoelasticity and Mechanical Stability
3.3. Microstructural and Compositional Characterization of Dual-Gel/HAp Hydrogels
3.4. In Vitro Cytocompatibility of Injectable Hydrogels
3.5. ALP and Alizarin Red S Analyses Reveal Superior Osteogenic Tendency of Dual-Gel/HAp Constructs
3.6. Dual-Gel/HAp Hydrogels Promote Osteogenic Differentiation
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ALP | Alkaline Phosphatase |
| ARS | Alizarin Red S |
| BMSCs | Bone Marrow Stem Cells |
| CCK-8 | Cell Counting Kit-8 |
| COL-1 | Collagen Type I |
| EDS | Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy |
| GAPDH | Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase |
| GelMA | Gelatin Methacryloyl |
| HAp | Hydroxyapatite |
| LAP | Lithium Phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate |
| OCN | Osteocalcin |
| PBS | Phosphate-Buffered Saline |
| qPCR | Quantitative Real-Time PCR |
| Runx2 | Runt-Related Transcription Factor 2 |
| SEM | Scanning Electron Microscopy |
| XRD | X-ray Diffraction |
Appendix A
| Primers | Sequences | |
|---|---|---|
| OCN | Forward | TTATTGCCCTCCTGCTTG |
| Reverse | TTATTGCCCTCCTGCTTG | |
| COL-1 | Forward | GAGGGCCAAGACGAAGACATC |
| Reverse | CAGATCACGTCATCGCACAAC | |
| Runx2 | Forward | GTGTCACTGCGCTGAAGAGG |
| Reverse | GACCAACCGAGTCATTTAAGGC | |
| Asterix | Forward | TCCTCCTGCGACTGCCCTAA |
| Reverse | TGCGAAGCCTTGCCATACA | |
| GAPDH | Forward | ACAACTTTGGTATCGTGGAAGG |
| Reverse | GCCATCACGCCACAGTTTC |
References
- Santoro, A.; Voto, A.; Fortino, L.; Guida, R.; Laudisio, C.; Cillo, M.; D’Ursi, A.M. Bone Defect Treatment in Regenerative Medicine: Exploring Natural and Synthetic Bone Substitutes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koons, G.L.; Diba, M.; Mikos, A.G. Materials design for bone-tissue engineering. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 584–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robin, M.; Mouloungui, E.; Castillo Dali, G.; Wang, Y.; Saffar, J.-L.; Pavon-Djavid, G.; Divoux, T.; Manneville, S.; Behr, L.; Cardi, D.; et al. Mineralized collagen plywood contributes to bone autograft performance. Nature 2024, 636, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Che, L.B.; Wang, Y.; Sha, D.Y.; Li, G.Y.; Wei, Z.H.; Liu, C.S.; Yuan, Y.; Song, D.W. A biomimetic and bioactive scaffold with intelligently pulsatile teriparatide delivery for local and systemic osteoporosis regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 19, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nitschke, B.M.; Butchko, E.A.; Wahby, M.N.; Breining, K.M.; Konz, A.E.; Grunlan, M.A. Shape Memory Polymer Bioglass Composite Scaffolds Designed to Heal Complex Bone Defects. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2024, 10, 6509–6519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Che, L.; Lei, Z.; Wu, P.; Song, D. A 3D Printable and Bioactive Hydrogel Scaffold to Treat Traumatic Brain Injury. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1904450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rong, X.; Xiao, S.; Geng, W.; Zhu, B.; Mou, P.; Ding, Z.; Zhang, B.; Fan, Y.; Qiu, L.; Cheng, C. Sono-activable and biocatalytic 3D-printed scaffolds for intelligently sequential therapies in osteosarcoma eradication and defect regeneration. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 6150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choudhury, S.; Joshi, A.; Agrawal, A.; Nain, A.; Bagde, A.; Patel, A.; Syed, Z.Q.; Asthana, S.; Chatterjee, K. NIR-Responsive Deployable and Self-Fitting 4D-Printed Bone Tissue Scaffold. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 49135–49147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, S.K.; Wong, Y.H.; Chin, K.-Y.; Ima-Nirwana, S. A Review on the Enhancement of Calcium Phosphate Cement with Biological Materials in Bone Defect Healing. Polymers 2021, 13, 3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.; Ma, Y.; Zhao, L.; Che, L.; Song, D.; Wu, Z.; Liu, C.; Yuan, Y. Injectable and In Situ Hydration-Reinforced Hybrid Bone Cements for Accelerated Bone Regeneration. Adv. Sci. 2025, e12723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Liu, C.; Chen, X.; He, Z.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, A.; Tang, S.; Wu, Z.; Liu, C.; Yuan, Y. Injectable double-crosslinked bone cement with enhanced bone adhesion and improved osteoporotic pathophysiological microenvironment for osteoregeneration in osteoporosis. Bioact. Mater. 2025, 43, 441–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghandforoushan, P.; Alehosseini, M.; Golafshan, N.; Castilho, M.; Dolatshahi-Pirouz, A.; Hanaee, J.; Davaran, S.; Orive, G. Injectable hydrogels for cartilage and bone tissue regeneration: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 246, 125674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Łuczak, J.W.; Palusińska, M.; Matak, D.; Pietrzak, D.; Nakielski, P.; Lewicki, S.; Grodzik, M.; Szymański, Ł. The Future of Bone Repair: Emerging Technologies and Biomaterials in Bone Regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabrizian, P.; Davis, S.; Su, B. From bone to nacre–development of biomimetic materials for bone implants: A review. Biomater. Sci. 2024, 12, 5680–5703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cai, P.; Ding, Y.; Wang, C.; Wu, J.; Hart, M.L.; Rolauffs, B.; Mo, X.; Sun, B. Advancing biomimetic bone Scaffolds: From electrospun 2D membranes to functional 3D nanofiber constructs. Biomed. Technol. 2025, 11, 100099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, E.; Huang, L.; Shen, Y.; Wei, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Chen, Z. Application of gelatin-based composites in bone tissue engineering. Heliyon 2024, 10, e36258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mehdi-Sefiani, H.; Chicardi, E.; Romero, A.; Perez-Puyana, V.M. Unveiling the Impact of Gelation Temperature on the Rheological and Microstructural Properties of Type A Gelatin Hydrogels. Polymers 2024, 16, 1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, K.; Trujillo-de Santiago, G.; Alvarez, M.M.; Tamayol, A.; Annabi, N.; Khademhosseini, A. Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 2015, 73, 254–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wahba, M.I. A comprehensive review on genipin: An efficient natural cross-linker for biopolymers. Polym. Bull. 2024, 81, 14251–14305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurian, A.G.; Singh, R.K.; Patel, K.D.; Lee, J.-H.; Kim, H.-W. Multifunctional GelMA platforms with nanomaterials for advanced tissue therapeutics. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 8, 267–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kadri, R.; Bacharouch, J.; Elkhoury, K.; Ben Messaoud, G.; Kahn, C.; Desobry, S.; Linder, M.; Tamayol, A.; Francius, G.; Mano, J.F.; et al. Role of active nanoliposomes in the surface and bulk mechanical properties of hybrid hydrogels. Mater. Today Bio 2020, 6, 100046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Wang, Y.; Miao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Fan, Z.; Singh, G.; Zhang, X.; Xu, K.; Li, B.; Hu, Z.; et al. Hydrogen bonds autonomously powered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels with super-elasticity, self-heal and underwater self-adhesion for sutureless skin and stomach surgery and E-skin. Biomaterials 2018, 171, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.; He, X.; Bai, J.; Su, S.; Zhou, R.; Gao, S.; Liu, H.; Zhou, F. Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles-Reinforced GelMA Hydrogel Loading Bone Marrow Stem Cells with Osteogenic and Inflammatory Regulatory Capacity for Bone Defect Repair. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 67373–67384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, X.; Zhou, F.; Wang, S.; Wang, G.; Bai, L.; Su, J. Bioinspired injectable hydrogels for bone regeneration. J. Adv. Res. 2025, 75, 163–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Ou, M.; Mao, Y.; Liu, Z.; Lin, Z.; Zhao, R.; Long, H.; Hu, Z.; Guo, H.; et al. Pubertal Bone Matrix Microparticles Support Rapid Generation of Mini-Bone Organoids and Minimally-Invasive Injection in Repairing Bone Defect. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, e01622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheon, S.Y.; Park, J.S.; Lee, Y.; Lee, C.; Jeon, H.; Lee, D.; Kim, S.H.; Lim, S.G.; Koo, H. Injectable and Self-Curing Single-Component Hydrogel for Stem Cell Encapsulation and In Vivo Bone Regeneration. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2304861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, F.; Lian, R.; Liu, L.; Liu, T.; Bi, C.; Hong, K.; Zhang, S.; Ren, J.; Wang, H.; Ouyang, N.; et al. Biomimetic Hydroxyapatite Nanorods Promote Bone Regeneration via Accelerating Osteogenesis of BMSCs through T Cell-Derived IL-22. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 755–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinchuk, N.D.; Sobierajska, P.; Szyszka, K.; Bezkrovnyi, O.; Wiglusz, R.J. Preparation of nanohydroxyapatite with diverse morphologies and optimization of its effective aqueous colloidal dispersions for biomedical applications. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 27426–27435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Ma, Y.; Samad, A.; Wang, Z.; Gu, Z.; Shi, J.; Cui, Y.; He, Y.; Gu, Z. Effects of irradiation sterilization on the physicochemical and functional properties of commercial biomedical hydrogels. Biomater. Sci. 2025, 13, 6270–6284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stolarov, P.; de Vries, J.; Stapleton, S.; Morris, L.; Martyniak, K.; Kean, T.J. Suitability of Gelatin Methacrylate and Hydroxyapatite Hydrogels for 3D-Bioprinted Bone Tissue. Materials 2024, 17, 1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xue, B.; Xu, Z.; Li, L.; Guo, K.; Mi, J.; Wu, H.; Li, Y.; Xie, C.; Jin, J.; Xu, J.; et al. Hydrogels with programmed spatiotemporal mechanical cues for stem cell-assisted bone regeneration. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 3633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Choudhury, S.; Joshi, A.; Dasgupta, D.; Ghosh, A.; Asthana, S.; Chatterjee, K. 4D printed biocompatible magnetic nanocomposites toward deployable constructs. Mater. Adv. 2024, 5, 3345–3356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Li, J.; Xiang, N.; Che, L.; Wu, J.; Song, D. An Injectable, Osteoconductive Gelatin-Enabled GelMA/HAp Hydrogel Scaffold for Minimally Invasive Bone Tissue Engineering. Bioengineering 2026, 13, 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13020139
Li J, Xiang N, Che L, Wu J, Song D. An Injectable, Osteoconductive Gelatin-Enabled GelMA/HAp Hydrogel Scaffold for Minimally Invasive Bone Tissue Engineering. Bioengineering. 2026; 13(2):139. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13020139
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Juhan, Nan Xiang, Lingbin Che, Jianfeng Wu, and Dianwen Song. 2026. "An Injectable, Osteoconductive Gelatin-Enabled GelMA/HAp Hydrogel Scaffold for Minimally Invasive Bone Tissue Engineering" Bioengineering 13, no. 2: 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13020139
APA StyleLi, J., Xiang, N., Che, L., Wu, J., & Song, D. (2026). An Injectable, Osteoconductive Gelatin-Enabled GelMA/HAp Hydrogel Scaffold for Minimally Invasive Bone Tissue Engineering. Bioengineering, 13(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13020139
