Next Article in Journal
Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Plasma’s Clinical Effectiveness in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Next Article in Special Issue
Electric Potential of Chlorella sp. Microalgae Biomass in Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs)
Previous Article in Journal
Accelerometry and the Capacity–Performance Gap: Case Series Report in Upper-Extremity Motor Impairment Assessment Post-Stroke
Previous Article in Special Issue
Metagenomic Insights into Pollutants in Biorefinery and Dairy Wastewater: rDNA Dominance and Electricity Generation in Double Chamber Microbial Fuel Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Bioelectrochemical Strategies for Enhanced Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production

by
Alejandro Chamizo-Ampudia
1,2,*,
Raúl. M. Alonso
3,
Luisa Ariza-Carmona
4,
África Sanchiz
1,2 and
María Isabel San-Martín
1,2,*
1
Biochemistry, Department of Molecular Biology, University of León, 24071 León, Spain
2
Instituto de Biología Molecular, Genómica y Proteómica (INBIOMIC), Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, 24071 León, Spain
3
Department of Electrical Engineering and Automatic Systems, University of León, 24071 León, Spain
4
Faculty of Education and Humanities, International University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2025, 12(6), 616; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060616
Submission received: 5 May 2025 / Revised: 27 May 2025 / Accepted: 3 June 2025 / Published: 5 June 2025

Abstract

The growing demand for sustainable bioplastics has driven research toward more efficient and cost-effective methods of producing polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs). Among the emerging strategies, bioelectrochemical technologies have been identified as a promising approach to enhance PHA production by supplying electrons to microorganisms either directly or indirectly. This review provides an overview of recent advancements in bioelectrochemical PHA synthesis, highlighting the advantages of this method, including increased production rates, the ability to utilize a wide range of substrates (including industrial and agricultural waste), and the potential for process integration with existing systems. Various bioelectrochemical systems (BES), electrode materials, and microbial strategies used for PHA biosynthesis are discussed, with a focus on the roles of electrode potentials and microbial electron transfer mechanisms in improving the polymer yield. The integration of BES into PHA production processes has been shown to reduce costs, enhance productivity, and support the use of renewable carbon sources. However, challenges remain, such as optimizing reactor design, scaling up processes, and improving the electron transfer efficiency. This review emphasizes the advancement of bioelectrochemical technologies combined with the use of agro-industrial waste as a carbon source, aiming to maximize the efficiency and sustainability of PHA production for large-scale industrial applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Bioelectrochemical technologies have emerged as innovative and sustainable platforms to enhance the microbial production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), a family of biodegradable and biocompatible polyesters that are regarded as promising alternatives to conventional petroleum-based plastics. Bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) have been increasingly employed in bioprocess engineering due to their ability to integrate microbial metabolism with electrochemical principles [1,2,3,4]. In these systems, electroactive microorganisms are utilized to catalyze redox reactions in the presence of an electrode, allowing the conversion of chemical energy derived from organic substrates into electrical energy and vice versa [5]. This unique capacity to manipulate electron flows has been harnessed not only to generate electricity but also to stimulate and optimize the microbial pathways involved in the biosynthesis of value-added products, including PHAs, under controlled electrochemical conditions [6,7]. One of the most promising configurations of BESs for PHA production involves the use of dual-chamber microbial fuel cells (MFCs), in which substrate oxidation by microorganisms in the anodic chamber is coupled with the generation of an electrical current and the simultaneous conversion of carbon sources into intracellular PHA granules [8]. This dual functionality allows for improved energy efficiency and resource utilization, while contributing to the overall sustainability and circularity of biorefinery processes [9]. The range of raw materials suitable for PHA production is remarkably broad, encompassing simple carbohydrates such as glucose and sucrose, vegetable oils, and glycerol—a major byproduct of biodiesel production—thus enabling the valorization of low-cost and renewable feedstocks [3]. Furthermore, the use of industrial and municipal wastewater as a carbon source has gained increasing attention as an economically and environmentally attractive option, offering the potential to combine waste treatment with biopolymer synthesis [3]. In parallel, advances in synthetic biology and plant biotechnology have led to the development of transgenic crops engineered to express bacterial PHA biosynthetic genes, which allows the direct accumulation of PHAs within plant tissue [10]. This approach represents a significant step toward integrating agricultural production with industrial biotechnology, potentially reducing the production costs and expanding the scope of PHA manufacturing systems [11]. Several companies and research initiatives are actively investigating these strategies, including the use of BESs and unconventional feedstocks, as part of a broader effort to promote sustainable materials and reduce the dependence on fossil-based plastics. Notable contributors to the development of PHA production from waste streams and bioelectrochemical processes include Veolia subsidiary Anoxkaldnes, as well as start-ups such as Micromidas, Mango Materials, Full Cycle Bioplastics, Newlight, and Paques Biomaterials [12]. Once produced, PHAs exhibit excellent versatility in their downstream processing, as they can be shaped into films, fibers, and molded articles using standard techniques such as injection molding and extrusion [13]. This compatibility with existing polymer-processing technologies facilitates the integration of PHAs into commercial applications across diverse sectors, including packaging, agriculture, and biomedicine, and underscores their potential as scalable and sustainable bioplastics for a future bio-based economy [14].

2. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs): Characteristics and Production

2.1. Types of PHA

Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) represent a diverse group of biopolyesters synthesized by a wide range of microorganisms, serving as intracellular storage materials for carbon and energy, typically under conditions where nutrients are limited but carbon sources are abundant [3,15]. These biopolymers have garnered significant attention in recent years due to their biodegradability, renewability, and the ability to tailor their material properties, positioning them as promising substitutes for conventional plastics in numerous industrial applications [16]. PHAs are composed of hydroxyalkanoate monomers linked through ester bonds, and the properties of these polymers can be manipulated by varying the composition of the monomers, their chain lengths, and the molecular weight of the polymer [3].
PHAs can be broadly classified into two main categories based on the lengths of the monomers’ carbon chains: short-chain-length PHAs (scl-PHAs) and medium-chain-length PHAs (mcl-PHAs) [3] (Figure 1). scl-PHAs consist of monomers containing three to five carbon atoms, while mcl-PHAs are composed of monomers with carbon chains ranging from six to fourteen atoms [3]. Among scl-PHAs, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) is the most extensively studied and commercially produced homopolymer [17]. PHB is known for its high crystallinity and tensile strength, which lends it good mechanical properties in static applications [18]. However, PHB suffers from inherent brittleness and poor elongation at break, which limits its use in dynamic and impact-resistant applications [19]. These shortcomings have led to the development of various copolymers, such as poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHB-co-HV), which incorporates 3-hydroxyvalerate (HV) monomers [19,20]. Adding HV reduces the polymer’s crystallinity, thus enhancing its flexibility, toughness, and overall processability [21]. The ratio of hydroxybutyrate (HB) to HV in the copolymer can be adjusted, allowing for the tuning of the mechanical and thermal properties [21]. For example, higher HV content improves the elasticity and lowers the polymer’s melting temperature, making it more suitable for a wider array of applications, including packaging and biomedical uses [21].
Another significant copolymer is poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) (PHB-co-HHx), which incorporates 3-hydroxyhexanoate (HHx) monomers [23]. This copolymer exhibits even greater ductility and reduced crystallinity compared to PHB-co-HV, enhancing its suitability for applications in tissue engineering, drug delivery, and other biomedical fields [24]. The incorporation of HHx units further contributes to the material’s improved flexibility, lower melting temperature, and better processability, making it an attractive material for applications requiring biocompatibility and biodegradability [24].
In contrast to scl-PHAs, mcl-PHAs, typically produced by microorganisms such as Pseudomonas species, exhibit elastomeric properties and lower crystallinity and melting points [3,25]. These mcl-PHAs are characterized by their high flexibility, extensibility, and compatibility with hydrophobic compounds [26]. Such properties make mcl-PHAs ideal candidates for use in applications where flexibility and stretchability are critical, such as in medical adhesives, wound dressings, coatings, and cosmetic formulations [27]. The synthesis of mcl-PHAs is often accomplished by utilizing fatty acids or other hydrophobic substrates, which provides an avenue for the use of waste oils and other low-cost materials as feedstocks, further enhancing the sustainability of their production [3].
The diversity of PHAs is further expanded by incorporating additional monomers into the polymer backbone [15]. For example, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) (P3HB-co-4HB) is a copolymer that incorporates 4-hydroxybutyrate (4HB), which significantly enhances the polymer’s elasticity, making it particularly well suited for biomedical applications such as tissue scaffolds, controlled drug release systems, and surgical sutures [28]. The flexibility of PHAs means that they can be further tuned by adjusting the ratio of 3HB to 4HB, enabling the production of materials with specific mechanical and degradation characteristics [28,29].
Recent advances in metabolic engineering and synthetic biology have enabled the production of tailor-made PHAs with novel monomers, imparting unique physicochemical properties [30]. These engineered PHAs may exhibit enhanced thermal resistance, UV stability, improved hydrophilicity, or other desirable attributes that are tailored to specific applications [31]. The ability to manipulate the monomer composition through the optimization of the microbial strains, fermentation conditions, and substrate selection provides a high degree of flexibility in producing PHAs with application-specific properties [32].
This structural versatility, combined with the biodegradability and environmental compatibility of PHAs, makes them suitable for a wide range of applications [33]. These include biodegradable packaging materials, agricultural films, medical implants, drug delivery systems, and other disposable products [33]. Moreover, the potential to produce PHAs from industrial byproducts, organic waste, or CO2-derived substrates enhances the sustainability and economic feasibility of their production [3]. As a result, PHAs are considered a promising alternative for the development of next-generation bioplastics that meet both performance and environmental sustainability criteria.
Additionally, the integration of PHAs into emerging biotechnologies, such as bioelectrochemical systems and synthetic biology, has opened up new avenues by which to enhance their production efficiency [7]. Bioelectrochemical systems, for instance, allow for the conversion of renewable resources and waste into PHAs, aligning with the principles of a circular bioeconomy [3,7,33,34]. The development of new microbial strains and fermentation processes, coupled with advances in process optimization, offers the potential to scale up PHA production, making it a viable option for large-scale industrial applications.
PHAs represent a highly promising class of bioplastics that not only offer significant advantages in terms of environmental sustainability but also provide a versatile platform for the creation of materials with tailored properties. Their ongoing development, driven by advances in biotechnology and synthetic biology, is expected to play a crucial role in the transition to a bio-based economy [7,35]

2.2. Microorganisms Involved in PHA Production

A wide array of bacterial species have been reported to synthesize and accumulate polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) as intracellular energy and carbon reserves, particularly under unbalanced nutritional conditions, such as limitations in essential nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, or oxygen, in the presence of excess carbon [3,32]. These biopolymers are stored in the form of granules within the cytoplasm and serve as metabolic buffers under stress conditions [36]. Among the most prominent and industrially relevant PHA-producing microorganisms is Cupriavidus necator (formerly Ralstonia eutropha), a Gram-negative β-proteobacterium capable of accumulating up to 90% of its dry cell weight as PHB under optimized conditions [3]. This strain is widely regarded as the model organism for PHA biosynthesis due to its robust growth, high polymer yields, and well-characterized metabolic pathways. It is known to utilize a broad range of carbon substrates, including glucose, sucrose, glycerol, fatty acids, and even organic acids derived from waste streams, making it highly adaptable to industrial processes [37]. Pseudomonas putida, another key PHA-producing bacterium, is notable for its ability to synthesize medium-chain-length PHAs (mcl-PHAs), which are elastomeric, less crystalline, and more flexible than short-chain-length PHAs (scl-PHAs) [25,37,38]. This species can metabolize a variety of hydrophobic substrates, including long-chain fatty acids, alkanes, and aromatic compounds, and is frequently employed in the biosynthesis of tailor-made copolymers for applications in packaging, biomedicine, and soft materials [39,40]. Azotobacter vinelandii, a nitrogen-fixing soil bacterium, is capable of PHA production under fully aerobic conditions, often without the need for nutrient limitations, which simplifies its cultivation and reduces the operational costs [41]. It has been shown to produce both PHB and PHB-co-HV depending on the carbon source supplied [42]. Bacillus megaterium, a Gram-positive bacterium with generally regarded as safe (GRAS) status, has gained attention due to its ability to grow on inexpensive substrates and to form PHAs without stringent sterile conditions [43]. Its thick cell walls and spore-forming capabilities enhance its resilience under industrial fermentation environments [44]. Alcaligenes latus is another fast-growing PHA producer, known for its ability to accumulate PHAs rapidly in batch and fed-batch systems, with minimal nutrient limitations and relatively short fermentation cycles, which is advantageous for continuous or semi-continuous PHA production [45]. The use of wild-type strains is frequently complemented by metabolic and genetic engineering strategies to enhance the monomer diversity, increase the carbon flux toward PHA biosynthesis, and improve the tolerance to precursor toxicity [46]. Novel extremophilic and marine bacteria, including halophiles such as Halomonas spp., have also been investigated due to their ability to grow under high-salinity conditions, reducing the need for strict sterilization and freshwater input [47].
In addition to these bacterial systems, various microalgae and cyanobacteria have also been explored for PHA production, offering the significant advantage of utilizing carbon dioxide as the primary carbon source through photosynthetic processes. Species such as Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, Spirulina platensis, and Chlorella vulgaris have demonstrated the ability to accumulate PHAs under nutrient-limited and stress-induced conditions [48,49]. These photoautotrophic microorganisms leverage the Calvin–Benson–Bassham (CBB) cycle, driven by light energy, to fix atmospheric CO2 into organic intermediates, which can subsequently be channeled toward PHA biosynthesis. Although the PHA yields from microalgae and cyanobacteria are typically lower compared to heterotrophic bacteria, their low nutrient requirements, potential integration with wastewater treatment systems, and direct utilization of CO2 make them attractive candidates for sustainable and eco-friendly bioplastic production [48,50]. Furthermore, ongoing efforts in metabolic engineering and cultivation optimization aim to enhance the carbon flux toward PHA accumulation in these photosynthetic platforms, broadening the scope for large-scale, carbon-neutral PHA production.
This diversity of microbial hosts, each with unique physiological and metabolic traits, enables the production of a wide spectrum of PHAs with varying mechanical, thermal, and degradation properties, thereby expanding their potential for commercialization in a range of sectors, including agriculture, food packaging, biomedicine, and environmental remediation. In addition, among these microorganisms, there are promising candidates with potential applications in bioelectrochemical processes, where their metabolic versatility and electron transfer capabilities could be harnessed for sustainable energy production, bioremediation, and bioplastic synthesis (Table 1).

2.3. Growth Conditions and Carbon Sources

The production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) is influenced by a range of factors that significantly impact both the efficiency and the quantity of the polymer produced [67]. Among the most critical factors are the carbon sources used, the growth conditions in which the microorganisms are cultured, and the genetic modifications of the microbial strains [3]. Each of these factors plays an essential role in optimizing the PHA production process, enabling higher yields and more sustainable bioplastic production [68,69].
Carbon sources are crucial in the production of PHAs because they provide the necessary building blocks for polymer synthesis and the energy required by microorganisms for growth [3]. In addition to being a source of carbon, they also serve as electron donors in microbial metabolism, playing an essential role in the electron transport chain, which is responsible for generating the ATP needed for PHA biosynthesis [70]. Traditionally, simple sugars such as glucose and sucrose have been the preferred carbon sources for PHA production [3]. These sugars are easily metabolized by most PHA-producing bacteria, which can rapidly grow and accumulate PHAs under favorable conditions [3]. However, the use of these traditional carbon sources can be expensive, particularly in large-scale production [71]. As a result, there has been growing interest in utilizing alternative and more sustainable carbon sources, particularly industrial and agricultural waste, which can be abundant, inexpensive, and renewable [72].
Agroindustrial residues, such as corn stover, sugarcane molasses, wheat straw, and fruit peels, have been identified as viable carbon sources for PHA production [3]. These residues are often rich in carbohydrates, fatty acids, and other organic compounds, which can be converted into fermentable sugars or volatile fatty acids (VFAs) through pretreatment processes [3,72]. Once these components are released, they can serve as excellent carbon sources for microbial fermentation [3,73]. Using waste materials such as these not only reduces the reliance on fossil-based raw materials but also helps to manage waste streams that would otherwise be discarded, contributing to a more sustainable and circular economy [74,75,76]. Studies have shown that PHA production from agricultural and industrial residues is not only feasible but can also lower the overall cost of production, especially when compared to the use of pure sugars [73,77,78].
Moreover, industrial waste streams, including byproducts from the production of biodiesel or food processing, have also proven to be effective carbon sources [3,79]. These waste products, rich in organic carbon, can be pretreated to release simpler sugars or fatty acids, which microorganisms can readily consume to produce PHAs [3,32]. The use of such waste streams has the dual benefit of reducing the environmental impact of industrial processes while also providing an affordable and renewable source of carbon for bioplastic production [80].
Alongside the selection of carbon sources, the growth conditions in which the microorganisms are cultivated are another critical factor that influences the yield and accumulation of PHAs [81]. Oxygen availability is one of the most important conditions affecting PHA production [82]. In many bacterial species, oxygen limitation is a key trigger for PHA accumulation [32,83,84,85]. Under conditions of oxygen scarcity, microorganisms divert the available carbon toward the synthesis of PHAs as a storage material for energy [32]. Managing the oxygen levels can, therefore, be a powerful tool by which to enhance PHA production [86]. Similarly, controlling the pH of the fermentation medium is vital to ensure optimal growth and polymer production [32]. Each bacterial strain has an ideal pH range in which it thrives—generally between 6.5 and 8.0—and deviations from this range can lead to stress, which negatively impacts PHA synthesis [87]. The temperature also plays a key role, with each microorganism having an optimal growth temperature that should be maintained throughout the fermentation process [32]. Nutrient limitations, such as nitrogen or phosphorus limitations, are often employed to promote PHA accumulation by limiting cell growth and directing more carbon to polymer production instead [3,32].
Genetic modifications of microbial strains can significantly enhance the production of PHAs by improving the ability of microorganisms to produce higher yields or to use a broader range of carbon sources [3,88]. Through genetic engineering, the metabolic pathways involved in PHA synthesis can be optimized to improve the efficiency of polymer production [89]. For example, overexpressing key genes in the PHA biosynthesis pathways or introducing new metabolic routes can boost PHA accumulation in microbial cells [90]. In Cupriavidus necator, the well-characterized phaCAB operon is known to encode β-ketothiolase (phaA), acetoacetyl-CoA reductase (phaB), and PHA synthase (phaC), which are considered essential for the conversion of acetyl-CoA into polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) [91]. Recently, metabolic modeling and genetic variability have been explored to optimize PHA production in this organism. In Pseudomonas putida, which is responsible for the biosynthesis of medium-chain-length PHAs (mcl-PHAs), various engineering strategies have been implemented. These have included the overexpression of genes such as phaC1, phaC2, phaG, and alkK, and the deletion of genes including phaZ (PHA depolymerase) and elements of the β-oxidation pathway (fadBA1, fadBA2), in order to improve precursor availability and increase polymer accumulation [39,92]. Moreover, phaC2 has been engineered—guided by structural analyses—to eliminate substrate trapping, resulting in substantial improvements in mcl-PHA production from substrates such as crude glycerol [93]. In addition, PHAs with tailored properties, such as enhanced thermal stability, flexibility, or biodegradability, can be obtained [94]. These engineered strains are often more robust and can achieve higher yields compared to wild-type strains, making the production process more cost-effective and scalable [95].
One promising development in improving the PHA production efficiency is the integration of electrochemical methods into the fermentation process [89]. Electrochemical approaches, which involve the use of electrodes to provide an external electron source, can significantly enhance PHA production by improving the efficiency of the electron transport chain [96,97]. By providing a supplementary source of electrons, the electrochemical process reduces the need for microorganisms to allocate carbon sources to energy production, allowing more carbon to be diverted toward PHA biosynthesis instead [98]. This can result in higher yields of PHAs without the need for additional carbon sources, thus improving the overall production efficiency [99]. Additionally, electrochemical methods can support the microbial reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2), potentially transforming a greenhouse gas into a valuable resource for PHA production, further contributing to a sustainable process [100].
In summary, the efficient production of PHAs relies on the careful selection of carbon sources, optimal growth conditions, and genetic modifications of microbial strains. The use of agroindustrial residues and industrial waste streams as carbon sources has gained considerable attention due to its cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and ability to contribute to waste management. Furthermore, the incorporation of electrochemical methods into the fermentation process can further enhance PHA production by improving the efficiency of the electron transport chain and enabling more carbon to be directed toward polymer synthesis. Together, these strategies can significantly increase the yield and sustainability of PHA production, making it a viable alternative to conventional plastics in a wide range of applications.

3. Bioelectrochemistry Applied to PHA Production

3.1. Principles of Bioelectrochemical Systems (BES)

Bioelectrochemical systems are hybrid platforms that integrate microbiological catalysis with electrochemical systems, offering a sustainable interface for both energy production and chemical synthesis (Figure 2). While originally developed for electricity generation in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) [101], BESs have increasingly gained attention for their potential in electrosynthesis—the microbial-driven formation of value-added chemicals using electrical energy and low-cost substrates like CO2, wastewater, or organic residues.
At the core of BES-based electrosynthesis is the capacity of electroactive microorganisms to perform extracellular electron transfer (EET). These microbes can either donate electrons to an anode or receive electrons from a cathode, thus catalyzing the reduction or oxidation reactions depending on the system configuration. In microbial electrosynthesis (MES), electrons supplied by the cathode are used by microbes to reduce carbon sources (e.g., CO2) into compounds such as acetate, butyrate, or even more complex organics [102].
A typical BES for electrosynthesis comprises a biofilm-covered electrode immersed in a chamber containing a suitable electron donor or acceptor. In MES systems, CO2 reduction occurs at the cathode or in the bulk, where microbes utilize electrons delivered from the electrode to drive endergonic biosynthetic pathways, leading to the production of platform chemicals [103]. Notably, these microbial electrosynthesis processes can be tailored to enable chain elongation [104], whereby short-chain carbon compounds like acetate are biologically upgraded into medium-chain carboxylates through sequential reduction and condensation reactions. These reactions offer a biologically mild, low-energy alternative to conventional thermochemical synthesis.
Recent research has shown that combining BESs with synthetic biology and metabolic engineering can enhance product selectivity and increase yields by modifying the microbial chassis to produce specific compounds of interest [105,106]. Thus, BESs for electrosynthesis represent a promising solution for decentralized chemical manufacturing, enabling the transformation of waste streams and renewable electricity into valuable biochemicals. However, challenges remain in terms of product recovery, process efficiency, and economic feasibility, which must be addressed before these systems can be industrially deployed.

3.2. Reactor Configurations and Limitations in Microbial Electrosynthesis for Value-Added Chemicals

MES is a promising bioelectrochemical platform that could utilize renewable electricity to drive the microbial reduction of CO2 into value-added chemicals such as acetate, methane, or other complex compounds. The performance of MES systems, however, is tightly linked to the reactor configuration, the availability of electron donors and CO2, and the physicochemical limitations of the system.
Recent progress in reactor engineering has significantly enhanced MES productivity. A compact plate reactor design with a zero-gap anode and large surface area with reticulated vitreous carbon cathodes demonstrated acetate and methane production rates that were competitive with those of conventional fermentation processes. For example, the MES of acetate by Thermoanaerobacter kivui reached up to 3.5 g/L·h at titers of 14 g/L, approaching the performance of glucose-fed chemostats and continuous gas fermentation systems [107]. Similarly, the methane production rates when using mixed cultures exceeded 10 L/L·d, highlighting the efficacy of the reactor architecture in overcoming mass transfer and current density constraints [108].
Despite these advances, MES systems are still limited by the availability of CO2, particularly in configurations that rely on low-flow or diluted gas streams. Unlike glucose or acetate fermentation, MES systems are highly dependent on the continuous, efficient delivery of CO2 to the cathodic biofilm. Inadequate CO2 partial pressures or suboptimal gas transfer can bottleneck microbial metabolism. For instance, a comparative analysis has shown that CO2 delivery was more efficient when switching from N2/CO2 (80/20) mixtures to pure CO2, resulting in improved acetate productivity [107]. Furthermore, insufficient gas tightness or diffusive CO2 losses across membranes also diminish the reactor performance, especially at low current densities [108].
This limitation is consistent with the broader challenges reported in anaerobic gas fermentation. The low solubility of CO2 and H2 in aqueous media severely constrains the rate of microbial conversion. Ale Enriquez and Ahring (2023) [109] emphasized that increasing the CO2 partial pressure—through pressurization or using membrane contactors—can significantly enhance the gas fermentation yields. They also noted that industrial CO2-rich streams like biogas and flue gas are attractive yet challenging feedstocks due to their variability and dilution.
To mitigate the CO2 limitations in MES, several strategies are under consideration: (i) increasing gas–liquid mass transfer through pressure control, (ii) optimizing the cathode porosity and flow-through designs to improve the CO2 accessibility at the biofilm surface, and (iii) employing reactor architectures that minimize the headspace and reduce diffusion losses. For example, the latest plate reactor designs achieve higher acetate productivity not only due to optimized hydrogen delivery but also due to improved flow dynamics, enabling them to maintain CO2 availability even under a high microbial demand [107].

4. Enhancing PHA Production Through Bioelectrochemical Technologies

By integrating biological processes with electrochemical techniques, BESs offer unique advantages for the control and optimization of PHA biosynthesis. This approach leverages the ability of microorganisms to utilize electrons derived from electrodes, thereby influencing metabolic pathways and improving the PHA yields. Research has demonstrated the potential of BESs to enhance PHA production by manipulating electron flows and creating favorable conditions for microbial growth and PHA accumulation, using organic matter in waste streams as the substrate for anodic microorganisms [110,111].

4.1. Metabolic Optimization via Electrical Stimulation

The application of an external voltage in BESs serves as a powerful tool to regulate metabolic pathways [112] that are crucial for PHA biosynthesis. Electrical stimulation allows for precise control over electron transfer to microorganisms, leading to increased reducing power [113], enhanced precursor availability [114], and the modulated transcription of key PHA biosynthetic genes. Studies have shown that, by optimizing the applied voltage, electrode materials, and reactor configurations, it is possible to significantly improve the PHA production rates and yields [4]. Moreover, electrical stimulation can influence the metabolic flux toward PHA synthesis, enhancing the overall efficiency of the process [115]. This approach offers a promising avenue for sustainable PHA production by utilizing renewable energy sources and minimizing the environmental impact.

4.2. Alternative Carbon Sources and Their Bioelectrochemical Conversion

The economic viability and sustainability of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production are strongly influenced by the cost and availability of carbon feedstocks [116]. Traditional PHA production relies heavily on refined sugars and vegetable oils, which can be expensive and prevent PHAs from being cost-effective alternatives to petroleum-derived plastics [77]. To address these limitations, bioelectrochemical systems are being explored to valorize alternative, low-cost carbon sources for PHA synthesis [8]. This approach not only reduces the production costs but also contributes to waste reduction and resource recovery, aligning with the principles of a circular economy.

4.2.1. Agricultural Residues

Lignocellulosic hydrolysates derived from agricultural residues represent a promising feedstock for BES-driven PHA production [117]. These residues, such as rice husk, apple, grape, corn stover, banana peel, and walnut shells, are abundant and readily available [118]. Through pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis, lignocellulosic biomass can be converted into a mixture of sugars, which can then be utilized by electroactive microorganisms in BESs [119] to produce PHA precursors. Indeed, research has found that an applied potential of 150 mV, utilizing a reactor equipped with two graphite electrodes (10 cm in length and 0.6 cm in diameter), significantly enhances the surface morphology and functionality of hemicellulose, leading to improved substrate uptake capacities under defined solid load and alkaline conditions, thereby favoring efficient substrate utilization for product recovery.

4.2.2. Industrial Byproducts

Industrial byproducts, including glycerol, wastewater, and food processing residues, offer another avenue for cost-effective PHA production using BESs. Glycerol, a byproduct of biodiesel production, can be efficiently converted into PHA [120] and it is furthermore extensively utilized as a substrate within microbial electrochemical systems [121,122]. For instance, one study effectively demonstrated this conversion in a 0.4-L reactor equipped with graphite plate electrodes (5 × 20 cm), applying a potential scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 [121]. Concurrently, other investigations have successfully employed larger, specialized reactor designs, such as a lamellar-type configuration featuring multiple anode-cathode compartments (e.g., each cathode frame with an inner volume of 0.56 L housing three IGS-743 graphite electrodes of 4 × 30 × 150 mm dimensions) to optimize the use of glycerol and other byproducts for PHA synthesis [122]. Similarly, wastewater streams containing organic pollutants and food processing residues rich in carbohydrates and fatty acids can be valorized as substrates for PHA synthesis [123]. This approach not only reduces waste disposal costs but also transforms these byproducts into valuable biopolymers.

4.2.3. CO2 Fixation

Bioelectrochemical systems that utilize CO2 fixation represent a particularly innovative and sustainable strategy for PHA production. In these systems, microorganisms capable of autotrophic growth utilize electrons provided by electrodes to reduce CO2 to organic molecules, which serve as precursors for PHA biosynthesis [124,125]. This approach offers the potential to produce PHAs from a greenhouse gas, contributing to carbon capture and utilization strategies. Recent studies have demonstrated the feasibility of this process; for instance, investigations employing indium nanoparticle electrodes as the working electrode (with a surface area of 1.7 cm−2) have shown promising results in CO2 conversion [124]. Furthermore, the microbial-catalyzed cathodic conversion of CO2 into key intermediates like acetate has been reported at a relatively low cathode potential—approximately −0.4 V—versus a standard hydrogen electrode (SHE), highlighting the energy efficiency of this route [126]. While still under development, CO2-based PHA production holds significant promise for a future bioeconomy.

4.3. Electrodes as Electron Acceptors and Donors

In BESs designed for PHA production, electrodes serve as pivotal components, acting as both electron acceptors and donors to manipulate microbial metabolism. When functioning as electron acceptors, electrodes enable microorganisms to oxidize organic substrates, effectively driving intracellular carbon flux toward the synthesis of PHA precursors such as volatile fatty acids [125,127]. This process is crucial in enhancing the availability of acetyl-CoA and other essential building blocks, thereby promoting efficient PHA accumulation [128]. By carefully controlling the electrode potential, researchers can optimize the oxidation of specific substrates and steer metabolic pathways toward PHA biosynthesis [7].
Conversely, electrodes also function as electron donors, supplying microorganisms with the electrons necessary for reduction reactions that support microbial growth and the polymerization of PHA monomers [100]. This reduction process is vital in maintaining cellular redox balance and providing the energy required for polymer synthesis. The ability to precisely regulate electron donation through electrode manipulation allows for the optimization of the microbial growth conditions and the control of the PHA polymer chain length and composition [129]. Therefore, the dual functionality of electrodes in BESs is essential in maximizing the PHA production efficiency and tailoring the polymer characteristics to specific applications.

5. State of the Art and Recent Advances

The integration of BESs into bioplastic production pathways has evolved significantly in recent years, transitioning from proof-of-concept studies to more complex and efficient setups. Early work demonstrated the potential of microaerophilic environments at the cathode to modulate microbial metabolism and promote PHA accumulation. In one such study, utilizing a system equipped with non-catalyzed graphite plate electrodes (a plain cathode with a surface area of 70 cm2 and a perforated anode with 83.5 cm2), the creation of a low-oxygen microenvironment favored electrogenesis and directed metabolic flux toward PHA biosynthesis, resulting in PHA content of 19% of the dry cell with a high proportion of 3-hydroxybutyrate (89%) [130]. This approach emphasizes the importance of electron availability and redox conditions in driving PHA production.
Building on this foundation, researchers have explored strategies to enhance electron uptake by biocatalysts. For instance, the use of immobilized redox mediators such as Prussian Blue significantly improved direct electron transfer to Rhodopseudomonas palustris TIE-1, leading to a 1.4-fold increase in PHB production compared to uncoated electrodes [131]. This particular study utilized pure graphite rod electrodes (with a surface area of 5.149 cm2) as the working electrodes. This approach contrasts earlier findings where soluble iron mediators were ineffective, highlighting the role of the electrode design and surface chemistry in optimizing BES performance.
Further innovations focused on carbon dioxide valorization through MES. A two-stage process combining CO2 fixation and VFA production with subsequent feeding to PHA-producing bacteria achieved a notable yield of 0.41 kg of PHA carbon per kg of CO2 carbon [132], and 0.460 g/L PHB was produced ex situ from 5 g/L acetate in a triple-chamber MES reactor [133]. In comparison, more recent single-stage systems employing co-cultures of acetogenic and PHB-accumulating bacteria have demonstrated significant improvements in process integration and efficiency. Notably, a symbiotic MES configuration achieved a 7.14-fold increase in the PHB yield under an optimized voltage and electrode functionalization with a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)–poly(styrenesulfonate) polymer [100], thus bypassing intermediate extraction steps and offering a streamlined route from CO2 to PHB. This particular system employed a stainless-steel (SS) mesh anode (measuring 2 × 10 cm, with an effective surface area of 1 mm2) and a graphite plate cathode (2 × 10 cm, with a thickness of 0.5 cm) as the electrodes, demonstrating the impacts of the electrode material and design on process efficiency.
The use of alternative feedstocks has also gained traction. In an MFC setup, Arenibacter palladensis was employed to hydrolyze chitin biomass and generate N-acetylglucosamine, which was then utilized by Ralstonia eutropha for PHA synthesis. This system simultaneously produced electricity and achieved notable PHA yields, showcasing the feasibility of using marine biomass as a substrate in BESs [134]. Similarly, textile wastewater served as both an electron donor and carbon source in a dual-chamber MFC, enabling simultaneous electricity generation, pollutant removal, and PHA production by Enterobacter spp., with the PHA content reaching over 56% of the cell dry mass [8]. These studies underscore the potential of BESs in coupling waste valorization with biopolymer synthesis.
Recent work has also explored the synergy between MES and microalgae cultivation. One study utilized volatile fatty acids produced from CO2 in MES as feedstock for microalgae, achieving substantial astaxanthin accumulation [135]. While this system was designed for antioxidant production, the underlying principle of integrating MES effluents with microbial or algal cultures could be extended to PHA-producing organisms, offering new avenues for the co-production of bioplastics and high-value compounds.
Lastly, photoelectrosynthesis using mixed cultures of purple phototrophic bacteria under heterotrophic conditions was shown to yield higher PHB titers (up to 58.23 mg/L) than previous photoautotrophic approaches using pure cultures [136]. This improvement was linked to the upregulation of PHA biosynthetic enzymes at lower applied voltages, emphasizing how the electron pressure and metabolic regulation are tightly coupled in these systems. Complementarily, a recent study leveraging microbial consortia and adaptive evolution techniques achieved PHB accumulation of up to 73% of the cell volume in Cupriavidus necator, suggesting the occurrence of direct interspecies electron transfer in BESs [7], a mechanism that could redefine the electron flow dynamics in these environments.
Together, these studies illustrate the progressive refinement of BES design and microbial engineering for PHA production. From microaerophilic control [130] to redox mediator optimization [131], CO2 conversion [100,132], waste valorization [8,134], and phototrophic integration [135,136], the field is moving toward more efficient, scalable, and sustainable bioprocesses. A comparative look at recent strategies reveals a clear trend: systems that integrate metabolic cooperation, optimized electron transfer interfaces, and non-conventional substrates show the greatest promise for industrial-scale application.

6. Challenges and Future Perspectives

Despite the significant advances in integrating BESs for PHA production, several scientific and technological challenges remain that limit their large-scale application and commercial viability. One of the most pressing issues is the relatively low production yields and rates compared to conventional fermentation processes. While the optimization of electrode materials and configurations has improved electron transfer and PHA accumulation in some systems [7,100,131], achieving industrially relevant titers with cost-effective setups is still a challenge.
Another major limitation lies in the metabolic efficiency and robustness of the microbial consortia used in BESs. Many electroactive bacteria are not naturally high PHA producers, and, conversely, efficient PHA-accumulating strains often lack extracellular electron transfer capabilities. Although recent approaches have used synthetic co-cultures or symbiotic systems to bridge this gap [7,100], maintaining long-term stability, preventing community shifts, and avoiding contamination are challenges that require further development in microbial ecology, metabolic engineering, and bioprocess control.
The availability and complexity of substrates also pose practical challenges. While BESs allow for the valorization of unconventional and low-cost carbon sources [137]—such as CO2 [135], chitin biomass [134], and textile wastewater [138]—these feedstocks often require pretreatment or careful system design to ensure compatibility with microbial metabolism and electrochemical conditions. Moreover, systems using gaseous substrates like CO2 must overcome mass transfer limitations and ensure sufficient reduction equivalents through efficient electron transfer mechanisms [139].
From an engineering perspective, electrode materials and reactor design are critical aspects that influence the system performance, scalability, and cost [140]. Although the functionalization of electrodes with graphene oxide, polymers, or redox mediators has shown promise [100,131,141], issues related to long-term stability, fouling, and economic feasibility remain unresolved. Furthermore, most studies to date are limited to laboratory-scale setups, and the transition to the pilot or industrial scale demands rigorous techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment to validate the environmental benefits and identify economic bottlenecks.
Looking forward, integrating BESs for PHA production within circular bioeconomy frameworks offers a promising pathway for sustainable bioplastic manufacturing. Future research should focus on developing genetically engineered strains capable of coupling extracellular electron uptake with efficient PHA biosynthesis, improving reactor designs for better mass and electron transfer, and exploring hybrid systems that combine BESs with phototrophic or algal processes. Advances in omics technologies and bioinformatics can also aid in elucidating the molecular mechanisms underpinning electron-driven metabolism, enabling more targeted system optimization.

7. Conclusions

Bioelectrochemical systems offer a transformative strategy by which to improve the production of PHAs, presenting a synergistic platform that integrates microbial metabolism with a controlled electron flow to enhance biopolymer synthesis. This review has highlighted how electrical stimulation can modulate intracellular redox states, increase the availability of key precursors such as acetyl-CoA, and influence the transcription of biosynthetic genes to steer microbial pathways toward efficient PHA accumulation. Moreover, the dual functionality of electrodes as both electron donors and acceptors enables precise control over the microbial activity, redox balance, and metabolic fluxes.
The integration of BESs with unconventional and low-cost feedstocks—including agricultural residues, industrial byproducts, and even CO2—demonstrates the potential of this approach to reduce costs and enhance sustainability, aligning with the goals of a circular bioeconomy. Advances in reactor configurations, electrode materials, and microbial consortia design have significantly improved the PHA yields and selectivity. Innovations such as symbiotic co-cultures, functionalized electrodes, and coupling with microbial electrosynthesis have expanded the range of feasible substrates and increased system productivity.
However, challenges remain regarding their long-term operational stability, electron transfer efficiency, microbial compatibility, and process scalability. Addressing these limitations will require integrated efforts in synthetic biology, bioengineering, and systems optimization. Looking forward, the development of genetically engineered strains capable of coupling electroactivity with high-yield PHA biosynthesis, along with techno-economic assessments and environmental impact analyses, will be essential in transitioning from lab-scale systems to industrial applications.
In conclusion, BES-driven PHA production stands out as a promising avenue for the production of sustainable bioplastics using renewable electricity and waste-derived feedstocks. Continued interdisciplinary research and innovation will be key to realizing its full potential and establishing this technology as a viable alternative to conventional plastic manufacturing.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation: A.C.-A., R.M.A., L.A.-C., Á.S. and M.I.S.-M.; writing—review and editing: A.C.-A., R.M.A., L.A.-C., Á.S. and M.I.S.-M.; supervision: A.C.-A. and M.I.S.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data have been created.

Acknowledgments

Ministerio de Universidades, Real Decreto 1059/2021, de 30 de noviembre, por el que se regula la concesión directa de diversas subvenciones a las universidades participantes en el proyecto “Universidades Europeas” de la Comisión Europea” y “European Education and Culture Executive Agency”, Project: 101004049—EURECA-PRO—EAC-A02-2019/EAC-A02-2019-1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Taguchi, S.; Matsumoto, K. Evolution of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Synthesizing Systems Toward a Sustainable Plastic Industry. Polym. J. 2021, 53, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Khatami, K.; Perez-Zabaleta, M.; Owusu-Agyeman, I.; Cetecioglu, Z. Waste to Bioplastics: How Close Are We to Sustainable Polyhydroxyalkanoates Production? Waste Manag. 2021, 119, 374–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Getino, L.; Martín, J.L.; Chamizo-Ampudia, A. A Review of Polyhydroxyalkanoates: Characterization, Production, and Application from Waste. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alvarez Chavez, B.; Raghavan, V.; Tartakovsky, B. A Comparative Analysis of Biopolymer Production by Microbial and Bioelectrochemical Technologies. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 16105–16118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Logan, B.E.; Rossi, R.; Ragab, A.; Saikaly, P.E. Electroactive Microorganisms in Bioelectrochemical Systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 307–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pandya, R.S.; Kaur, T.; Bhattacharya, R.; Bose, D.; Saraf, D. Harnessing Microorganisms for Bioenergy with Microbial Fuel Cells: Powering the Future. Water-Energy Nexus 2024, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nastro, R.A.; Kuppam, C.; Toscanesi, M.; Trifuoggi, M.; Pietrelli, A.; Pasquale, V.; Avignone-Rossa, C. Bio-Electrosynthesis of Polyhydroxybutyrate and Surfactants in Microbial Fuel Cells: A Preliminary Study. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1372302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chaijak, P.; Rakkan, T.; Paichaid, N.; Thipraksa, J.; Michu, P.; Sangkharak, K. Exploring Potential Aspect of Microbial Fuel Cell (MFC) for Simultaneous Energy, Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Production and Textile Wastewater (TW) Treatment. J. Polym. Environ. 2024, 32, 3104–3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tsipa, A.; Varnava, C.K.; Nastro, R.A.; Ieropoulos, I. Biosurfactants, Polyhydroxyalkanoates, and Other Added-Value Products from Wastewater Electro-Bioremediation: A New Biorefinery Concept. In Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  10. Aghaali, Z.; Naghavi, M.R. Biotechnological Approaches for Enhancing Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) Production: Current and Future Perspectives. Curr. Microbiol. 2023, 80, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khan, A.K.; Anjum, I.; Hano, C.; Abbasi, B.H.; Anjum, S. An Overview on Feasible Production of Bioplastic Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) in Transgenic Plants. In Bioplastics for Sustainable Development; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 555–579. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kim, G.B.; Choi, S.Y.; Cho, I.J.; Ahn, D.-H.; Lee, S.Y. Metabolic Engineering for Sustainability and Health. Trends Biotechnol. 2023, 41, 425–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Koller, M.; Mukherjee, A. A New Wave of Industrialization of PHA Biopolyesters. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kaur, R.; Pathak, L.; Vyas, P. Biobased Polymers of Plant and Microbial Origin and Their Applications—A Review. Biotechnol. Sustain. Mater. 2024, 1, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mai, J.; Kockler, K.; Parisi, E.; Chan, C.M.; Pratt, S.; Laycock, B. Synthesis and Physical Properties of Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA)-Based Block Copolymers: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 263, 130204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Karnwal, A.; Kumar, G.; Singh, R.; Selvaraj, M.; Malik, T.; Al Tawaha, A.R.M. Natural Biopolymers in Edible Coatings: Applications in Food Preservation. Food Chem. X 2025, 25, 102171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Eraslan, K.; Aversa, C.; Nofar, M.; Barletta, M.; Gisario, A.; Salehiyan, R.; Goksu, Y.A. Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyhexanoate) (PHBH): Synthesis, Properties, and Applications—A Review. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 167, 111044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zainuddin, M.Z.; Abu Bakar, A.A.; Adam, A.N.; Abdullah, S.M.; Tamchek, N.; Alauddin, M.S.; Mahat, M.M.; Wiwatcharagoses, N.; Alforidi, A.; Ghazali, M.I.M. Mechanical and Structural Properties of Polyhydroxybutyrate as Additive in Blend Material in Additive Manufacturing for Medical Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kervran, M.; Vagner, C.; Cochez, M.; Ponçot, M.; Saeb, M.R.; Vahabi, H. Thermal Degradation of Polylactic Acid (PLA)/Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) Blends: A Systematic Review. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2022, 201, 109995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Râpă, M.; Stefan, L.M.; Seciu-Grama, A.-M.; Gaspar-Pintiliescu, A.; Matei, E.; Zaharia, C.; Stănescu, P.O.; Predescu, C. Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) (P(3HB-Co-3HV))/Bacterial Cellulose (BC) Biocomposites for Potential Use in Biomedical Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 5544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abbasi, M.; Pokhrel, D.; Coats, E.R.; Guho, N.M.; McDonald, A.G. Effect of 3-Hydroxyvalerate Content on Thermal, Mechanical, and Rheological Properties of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) Biopolymers Produced from Fermented Dairy Manure. Polymers 2022, 14, 4140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Katagi, V.; Vytla, R.M.; Somashekara, D. Integrated Production of Microbial Biopolymer (PHA) with Other Value-Added Bioproducts: An Innovative Approach for Sustainable Production. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2024, 17, 2289983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Volova, T.G.; Uspenskaya, M.V.; Kiselev, E.G.; Sukovatyi, A.G.; Zhila, N.O.; Vasiliev, A.D.; Shishatskaya, E.I. Effect of Monomers of 3-Hydroxyhexanoate on Properties of Copolymers Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co 3-Hydroxyhexanoate). Polymers 2023, 15, 2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Thiele, I.; Santolin, L.; Meyer, K.; Machatschek, R.; Bölz, U.; Tarazona, N.A.; Riedel, S.L. Microbially Synthesized Poly(Hydroxybutyrate-Co-Hydroxyhexanoate) with Low to Moderate Hydroxyhexanoate Content: Properties and Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 263, 130188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Getino, L.; García, I.; Cornejo, A.; Mateos, R.; Ariza-Carmona, L.M.; Sánchez-Castro, N.; Moran, J.F.; Olivera, E.R.; Chamizo-Ampudia, A. The Effectiveness of Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Extraction Methods in Gram-Negative Pseudomonas putida U. Polymers 2025, 17, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hahn, T.; Alzate, M.O.; Leonhardt, S.; Tamang, P.; Zibek, S. Current Trends in Medium-chain-length Polyhydroxyalkanoates: Microbial Production, Purification, and Characterization. Eng. Life Sci. 2024, 24, e2300211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Panaksri, A.; Tanadchangsaeng, N. Evaluation of 3D-Printing Scaffold Fabrication on Biosynthetic Medium-Chain-Length Polyhydroxyalkanoate Terpolyester as Biomaterial-Ink. Polymers 2021, 13, 2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pospisilova, A.; Vodicka, J.; Trudicova, M.; Juglova, Z.; Smilek, J.; Mencik, P.; Masilko, J.; Slaninova, E.; Melcova, V.; Kalina, M.; et al. Effects of Differing Monomer Compositions on Properties of P(3HB-Co-4HB) Synthesized by Aneurinibacillus Sp. H1 for Various Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huong, K.-H.; Sevakumaran, V.; Amirul, A.A. P(3HB-4HB) as High Value Polyhydroxyalkanoate: Its Development over Recent Decades and Current Advances. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2021, 41, 474–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Min Song, H.; Chan Joo, J.; Hyun Lim, S.; Jin Lim, H.; Lee, S.; Jae Park, S. Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoates Containing Monomers Conferring Amorphous and Elastomeric Properties from Renewable Resources: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 366, 128114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Derippe, G.; Philip, L.; Lemechko, P.; Eyheraguibel, B.; Meistertzheim, A.-L.; Pujo-Pay, M.; Conan, P.; Barbe, V.; Bruzaud, S.; Ghiglione, J.-F. Marine Biodegradation of Tailor-Made Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) Influenced by the Chemical Structure and Associated Bacterial Communities. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 462, 132782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, W.; Bergsma, S.; Colpa, D.I.; Euverink, G.-J.W.; Krooneman, J. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) Synthesis and Degradation by Microbes and Applications towards a Circular Economy. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 341, 118033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hadri, S.H.; Tareen, N.; Hassan, A.; Naseer, M.; Ali, K.; Javed, H. Alternatives to Conventional Plastics: Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) from Microbial Sources and Recent Approaches—A Review. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2025, 195, 106809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ramanaiah, S.V.; Chandrasekhar, K.; Cordas, C.M.; Potoroko, I. Bioelectrochemical Systems (BESs) for Agro-Food Waste and Wastewater Treatment, and Sustainable Bioenergy-A Review. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 325, 121432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rosenboom, J.-G.; Langer, R.; Traverso, G. Bioplastics for a Circular Economy. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2022, 7, 117–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Manoli, M.-T.; Nogales, J.; Prieto, A. Synthetic Control of Metabolic States in Pseudomonas Putida by Tuning Polyhydroxyalkanoate Cycle. mBio 2022, 13, e0179421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Santolin, L.; Riedel, S.L.; Brigham, C.J. Synthetic Biology Toolkit of Ralstonia Eutropha (Cupriavidus Necator). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 108, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tanikkul, P.; Sullivan, G.L.; Sarp, S.; Pisutpaisal, N. Biosynthesis of Medium Chain Length Polyhydroxyalkanoates (Mcl-PHAs) from Palm Oil. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2020, 2, 100045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Olivera, E.R.; Luengo, J.M. Engineering Strategies for Efficient and Sustainable Production of Medium-Chain Length Polyhydroxyalkanoates in Pseudomonads. In Bioplastics for Sustainable Development; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 581–660. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mezzina, M.P.; Manoli, M.T.; Prieto, M.A.; Nikel, P.I. Engineering Native and Synthetic Pathways in Pseudomonas Putida for the Production of Tailored Polyhydroxyalkanoates. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 16, 2000165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Velázquez-Sánchez, C.; Espín, G.; Peña, C.; Segura, D. The Modification of Regulatory Circuits Involved in the Control of Polyhydroxyalkanoates Metabolism to Improve Their Production. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. García, A.; Segura, D.; Espín, G.; Galindo, E.; Castillo, T.; Peña, C. High Production of Poly-β-Hydroxybutyrate (PHB) by an Azotobacter Vinelandii Mutant Altered in PHB Regulation Using a Fed-Batch Fermentation Process. Biochem. Eng. J. 2014, 82, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rodríguez-Contreras, A.; Koller, M.; Miranda-de Sousa Dias, M.; Calafell-Monfort, M.; Braunegg, G.; Marqués-Calvo, M.S. High Production of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) from a Wild Bacillus Megaterium Bolivian Strain. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 114, 1378–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Velloso, C.C.V.; Camargo, B.C.P.; Sousa, M.D.B.; Buffo, M.M.; de Oliveira Paiva, C.A.; Farinas, C.S.; Badino, A.C. High Yield of Heat-Resistant Spores of Bacillus Megaterium in Bioreactors. Biochem. Eng. J. 2023, 198, 109030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, B.; Sharma-Shivappa, R.R.; Olson, J.W.; Khan, S.A. Production of Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) by Alcaligenes Latus Using Sugarbeet Juice. Ind. Crops. Prod. 2013, 43, 802–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Paduvari, R.; Somashekara, D.M. Advancements in Genetic Engineering for Enhanced Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) Production: A Comprehensive Review of Metabolic Pathway Manipulation and Gene Deletion Strategies. Bioengineered 2025, 16, 2458363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mitra, R.; Xu, T.; Xiang, H.; Han, J. Current Developments on Polyhydroxyalkanoates Synthesis by Using Halophiles as a Promising Cell Factory. Microb. Cell Fact. 2020, 19, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zheng, Y.; Dzakpasu, M.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.; Zhao, Y. Molecular Characterization of Long-Term Impacts of Macrophytes Harvest Management in Constructed Wetlands. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 268, 514–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Maruyama, S.; Matsuoka, T.; Hosomi, K.; Park, J.; Nishimura, M.; Murakami, H.; Konishi, K.; Miyachi, M.; Kawashima, H.; Mizuguchi, K.; et al. Characteristic Gut Bacteria in High Barley Consuming Japanese Individuals without Hypertension. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ng, C.A.; Pernica, M.; Litvanova, K.; Kolouchova, I.; Branyik, T. Biocontrol Using Pythium Oligandrum during Malting of Fusarium-Contaminated Barley. Fermentation 2023, 9, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chin, J.H.-C.; Samian, M.R.; Normi, Y.M. Characterization of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production Capacity, Composition and Weight Synthesized by Burkholderia Cepacia JC-1 from Various Carbon Sources. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rogiers, T.; Merroun, M.L.; Williamson, A.; Leys, N.; Van Houdt, R.; Boon, N.; Mijnendonckx, K. Cupriavidus Metallidurans NA4 Actively Forms Polyhydroxybutyrate-Associated Uranium-Phosphate Precipitates. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 421, 126737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Flüchter, S.; Follonier, S.; Schiel-Bengelsdorf, B.; Bengelsdorf, F.R.; Zinn, M.; Dürre, P. Anaerobic Production of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) and Its Precursor 3-Hydroxybutyrate from Synthesis Gas by Autotrophic Clostridia. Biomacromolecules 2019, 20, 3271–3282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dalton, B.; Bhagabati, P.; De Micco, J.; Padamati, R.B.; O’Connor, K. A Review on Biological Synthesis of the Biodegradable Polymers Polyhydroxyalkanoates and the Development of Multiple Applications. Catalysts 2022, 12, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mohanrasu, K.; Guru Raj Rao, R.; Dinesh, G.H.; Zhang, K.; Sudhakar, M.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Jeyakanthan, J.; Ponnuchamy, K.; Govarthanan, M.; Arun, A. Production and Characterization of Biodegradable Polyhydroxybutyrate by Micrococcus Luteus Isolated from Marine Environment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 186, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Jamil, K.B. Synthesis of Environmental Bioplastic Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) from Waste Glycerol, Palm Oil and Different Concentrations of Glucose by A New Strain Propionibacterium Sp. Iraqi J. Ind. Res. 2022, 9, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Oyewole, O.A.; Abdulmalik, S.U.; Abubakar, A.O.; Chimbekujwo, K.I.; Obafemi, Y.D.; Oyegbile, B.; Abioye, O.P.; Adeniyi, O.D.; Egwim, E.C. Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoate (Pha) by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (Ol405443) Using Agrowastes as Carbon Source. Clean. Mater. 2024, 11, 100217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Song, H.M.; Jo, S.Y.; Lee, H.; Jeon, S.; Yun, D.; Kim, C.; Son, J.; Sohn, Y.J.; Choi, J.-I.; Park, S.J. Recent Advances on the Systems Metabolically Engineered Pseudomonas Species as Versatile Biosynthetic Platforms for the Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoates. Syst. Microbiol. Biomanuf. 2024, 4, 473–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ranaivoarisoa, T.O.; Bai, W.; Karthikeyan, R.; Steele, H.; Silberman, M.; Olabode, J.; Conners, E.; Gallagher, B.; Bose, A. Overexpression of RuBisCO Form I and II Genes in Rhodopseudomonas Palustris TIE-1 Augments Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production Heterotrophically and Autotrophically. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2024, 90, e01438-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. González-Resendiz, L.; Sánchez-García, L.; Hernández-Martínez, I.; Vigueras-Ramírez, G.; Jiménez-García, L.F.; Lara-Martínez, R.; Morales-Ibarría, M. Photoautotrophic Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) Production by a Wild-Type Synechococcus Elongatus Isolated from an Extreme Environment. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 337, 125508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Gonzalez-Aravena, A.C.; Yunus, K.; Zhang, L.; Norling, B.; Fisher, A.C. Tapping into Cyanobacteria Electron Transfer for Higher Exoelectrogenic Activity by Imposing Iron Limited Growth. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 20263–20274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhila, N.O.; Kiselev, E.G.; Shishatskaya, E.I.; Ghorabe, F.D.E.; Kazachenko, A.S.; Volova, T.G. Comparative Study of the Synthesis of Polyhydroxyalkanoates by Cyanobacteria Spirulina Platensis and Green Microalga Chlorella Vulgaris. Algal Res. 2025, 85, 103826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Longtin, N.; Oliveira, D.; Mahadevan, A.; Gejji, V.; Gomes, C.; Fernando, S. Analysis of Spirulina Platensis Microalgal Fuel Cell. J. Power Sources 2021, 486, 229290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Elma Karakaş, D.; Akdemir, M.; Atabani, A.E.; Kaya, M. A Dual Functional Material: Spirulina Platensis Waste-Supported Pd-Co Catalyst as a Novel Promising Supercapacitor Electrode. Fuel 2021, 304, 121334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. De Caprariis, B.; De Filippis, P.; Di Battista, A.; Di Palma, L.; Scarsella, M. Exoelectrogenic Activity of a Green Microalgae, Chlorella Vulgaris, in a Bio-Photovoltaic Cells (BPVs). Chem. Eng. Trans. 2014, 38, 523–528. [Google Scholar]
  66. Song, X.; Wang, W.; Cao, X.; Wang, Y.; Zou, L.; Ge, X.; Zhao, Y.; Si, Z.; Wang, Y. Chlorella Vulgaris on the Cathode Promoted the Performance of Sediment Microbial Fuel Cells for Electrogenesis and Pollutant Removal. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 728, 138011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sabapathy, P.C.; Devaraj, S.; Meixner, K.; Anburajan, P.; Kathirvel, P.; Ravikumar, Y.; Zabed, H.M.; Qi, X. Recent Developments in Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) Production—A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 306, 123132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kumar Sachan, R.S.; Devgon, I.; Mohammad Said Al-Tawaha, A.R.; Karnwal, A. Optimizing Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production Using a Novel Bacillus Paranthracis Isolate: A Response Surface Methodology Approach. Heliyon 2024, 10, e35398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ibrahim, R.; Aranjani, J.M.; Prasanna, N.; Biswas, A.; Gayam, P.K.R. Production, Isolation, Optimization, and Characterization of Microbial PHA from Bacillus Australimaris. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 8395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Abd-El-Haleem, D.A.M.; Elkatory, M.R.; Abu-Elreesh, G.M. Uncovering Novel Polyhydroxyalkanoate Biosynthesis Genes and Unique Pathway in Yeast Hanseniaspora Valbyensis for Sustainable Bioplastic Production. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 27162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chien Bong, C.P.; Alam, M.N.H.Z.; Samsudin, S.A.; Jamaluddin, J.; Adrus, N.; Mohd Yusof, A.H.; Muis, Z.A.; Hashim, H.; Salleh, M.M.; Abdullah, A.R.; et al. A Review on the Potential of Polyhydroxyalkanoates Production from Oil-Based Substrates. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 298, 113461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Carvalho, A.C.F.; Ghosh, S.; Hoffmann, T.G.; Prudêncio, E.S.; de Souza, C.K.; Roy, S. Valuing Agro-Industrial Waste in the Development of Sustainable Food Packaging Based on the System of a Circular Bioeconomy: A Review. Clean. Waste Syst. 2025, 11, 100275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kusuma, H.S.; Sabita, A.; Putri, N.A.; Azliza, N.; Illiyanasafa, N.; Darmokoesoemo, H.; Amenaghawon, A.N.; Kurniawan, T.A. Waste to Wealth: Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) Production from Food Waste for a Sustainable Packaging Paradigm. Food Chem. Mol. Sci. 2024, 9, 100225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Alaghemandi, M. Sustainable Solutions Through Innovative Plastic Waste Recycling Technologies. Sustainability 2024, 16, 10401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zong, Z.; Rao, C.; Du, C.; Lu, R.; Upham, D.C. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) Production in a Circular CO2 Economy: It’s Role in Mitigating Global CO2 Emissions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2025, 219, 108303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yadav, B.S.; Yadav, R.B.; Kumari, M.; Khatkar, B.S. Studies on Suitability of Wheat Flour Blends with Sweet Potato, Colocasia and Water Chestnut Flours for Noodle Making. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 57, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Castilho, L.R.; Mitchell, D.A.; Freire, D.M.G. Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) from Waste Materials and by-Products by Submerged and Solid-State Fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 5996–6009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, J.; Liu, S.; Huang, J.; Qu, Z. A Review on Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production from Agricultural Waste Biomass: Development, Advances, Circular Approach, and Challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 342, 126008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kumar, P.; Mehariya, S.; Ray, S.; Mishra, A.; Kalia, V.C. Biodiesel Industry Waste: A Potential Source of Bioenergy and Biopolymers. Indian J. Microbiol. 2015, 55, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Islam, M.; Xayachak, T.; Haque, N.; Lau, D.; Bhuiyan, M.; Kumar Pramanik, B. Impact of Bioplastics on Environment from Its Production to End-of-Life. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024, 188, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Guo, R.; Cen, X.; Ni, B.-J.; Zheng, M. Bioplastic Polyhydroxyalkanoate Conversion in Waste Activated Sludge. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 370, 122866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Madhusoodanan, G.; Chandrashekar Hariharapura, R.; Somashekara, D. Dissolved Oxygen as a Propulsive Parameter for Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production Using Bacillus Endophyticus Cultures. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 24, 4641–4658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Muigano, M.N.; Mauti, G.O.; Anami, S.E.; Onguso, J.M. Advances and Challenges in Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) Production Using Halomonas Species: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 309, 142850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tang, R.; Weng, C.; Peng, X.; Han, Y. Metabolic Engineering of Cupriavidus Necator H16 for Improved Chemoautotrophic Growth and PHB Production under Oxygen-Limiting Conditions. Metab. Eng. 2020, 61, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Li, D.; Yan, X.; Li, Y.; Ma, X.; Li, J. Achieving Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production from Rubber Wood Waste Using Mixed Microbial Cultures and Anaerobic-Aerobic Feeding Regime. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 199, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, Y.; Yin, J.; Chen, G.-Q. Polyhydroxyalkanoates, Challenges and Opportunities. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Koller, M. Polyhydroxyalkanoate Biosynthesis at the Edge of Water Activity-Haloarchaea as Biopolyester Factories. Bioengineering 2019, 6, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Drakonaki, A.; Mathioudaki, E.; Geladas, E.D.; Konsolaki, E.; Vitsaxakis, N.; Chaniotakis, N.; Xie, H.; Tsiotis, G. Production of Polyhydroxybutyrate by Genetically Modified Pseudomonas Sp. PhDV1: A Comparative Study of Utilizing Wine Industry Waste as a Carbon Source. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wang, J.; Liu, S.; Huang, J.; Cui, R.; Xu, Y.; Song, Z. Genetic Engineering Strategies for Sustainable Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Production from Carbon-Rich Wastes. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2023, 30, 103069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chacón, M.; Wongsirichot, P.; Winterburn, J.; Dixon, N. Genetic and Process Engineering for Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production from Pre- and Post-Consumer Food Waste. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2024, 85, 103024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Morlino, M.S.; Serna García, R.; Savio, F.; Zampieri, G.; Morosinotto, T.; Treu, L.; Campanaro, S. Cupriavidus Necator as a Platform for Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production: An Overview of Strains, Metabolism, and Modeling Approaches. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023, 69, 108264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Salvachúa, D.; Rydzak, T.; Auwae, R.; De Capite, A.; Black, B.A.; Bouvier, J.T.; Cleveland, N.S.; Elmore, J.R.; Furches, A.; Huenemann, J.D.; et al. Metabolic Engineering of Pseudomonas Putida for Increased Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production from Lignin. Microb. Biotechnol. 2020, 13, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hur, D.H.; Lee, J.; Park, S.J.; Jeong, K.J. Engineering of Pseudomonas Putida to Produce Medium-Chain-Length Polyhydroxyalkanoate from Crude Glycerol. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 281, 136411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Jaffur, B.N.; Kumar, G.; Khadoo, P. Production and Functionalization Strategies for Superior Polyhydroxybutyrate Blend Performance. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 278, 134907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Abbate, E.; Andrion, J.; Apel, A.; Biggs, M.; Chaves, J.; Cheung, K.; Ciesla, A.; Clark-ElSayed, A.; Clay, M.; Contridas, R.; et al. Optimizing the Strain Engineering Process for Industrial-Scale Production of Bio-Based Molecules. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 50, kuad025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Li, S.; Kim, M.; Kong, D.S.; Min, K.; Wu, G.; Cui, M.; Kim, C.; Oh, Y.-K.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.Y.; et al. Electron Uptake from Solid Electrodes Promotes the More Efficient Conversion of CO2 to Polyhydroxybutyrate by Using Rhodobacter Sphaeroides. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 469, 143785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Pilania, P.; Bhushan, K.; Phutela, U.G. Electro-Fermentation for Biofuel and Biochemical Production. Fermentation 2025, 11, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhao, L.; Sun, M.; Lyu, C.; Meng, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, B. Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production during Electroactive Biofilm Formation and Stabilization in Wetland Microbial Fuel Cells for Petroleum Hydrocarbon Bioconversion. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 2025, 10, 474–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Langsdorf, A.; Schütz, J.P.; Ulber, R.; Stöckl, M.; Holtmann, D. Production of Polyhydroxybutyrate from Industrial Flue Gas by Microbial Electrosynthesis. J. CO2 Util. 2024, 83, 102800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Le, G.T.H.; Omar Mohamed, H.; Kim, H.; Yoo, K.; Eisa, T.; Jadhav, D.A.; Nguyen, H.T.T.; Eam, H.; Myung, J.; Castaño, P.; et al. Microbial Symbiotic Electrobioconversion of Carbon Dioxide to Biopolymer (Poly (3-Hydroxybutyrate)) via Single-Step Microbial Electrosynthesis Cell. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 500, 156635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Aelterman, P.; Rabaey, K.; Clauwaert, P.; Verstraete, W. Microbial Fuel Cells for Wastewater Treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 54, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Boto, S.T.; Cristiani, L.; Rosenbaum, M.A. Biochemical Production with Microbial Bioelectrochemical Systems. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2025, 93, 103291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Mateos, R.; Sotres, A.; Alonso, R.M.; Escapa, A.; Morán, A. Impact of the Start-up Process on the Microbial Communities in Biocathodes for Electrosynthesis. Bioelectrochemistry 2018, 121, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cabau-Peinado, O.; Winkelhorst, M.; Stroek, R.; de Kat Angelino, R.; Straathof, A.J.J.; Masania, K.; Daran, J.M.; Jourdin, L. Microbial Electrosynthesis from CO2 Reaches Productivity of Syngas and Chain Elongation Fermentations. Trends Biotechnol. 2024, 42, 1503–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Paquete, C.M.; Rosenbaum, M.A.; Bañeras, L.; Rotaru, A.-E.; Puig, S. Let’s Chat: Communication between Electroactive Microorganisms. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 347, 126705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Rosenbaum, M.A.; Henrich, A.W. Engineering Microbial Electrocatalysis for Chemical and Fuel Production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 29, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Deutzmann, J.S.; Callander, G.; Spormann, A.M. Improved Reactor Design Enables Productivity of Microbial Electrosynthesis on Par with Classical Biotechnology. Bioresour. Technol. 2025, 416, 131733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Deutzmann, J.S.; Spormann, A.M. High Acetate Titer Obtained from CO2 by Thermophilic Microbial Electrosynthesis with Thermoanaerobacter Kivui. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2024, 25, 101740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ale Enriquez, F.; Ahring, B.K. Strategies to Overcome Mass Transfer Limitations of Hydrogen during Anaerobic Gaseous Fermentations: A Comprehensive Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 377, 128948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Pant, D.; Van Bogaert, G.; Diels, L.; Vanbroekhoven, K. A Review of the Substrates Used in Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs) for Sustainable Energy Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 1533–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Freguia, S.; Rabaey, K.; Yuan, Z.; Keller, J. Electron and Carbon Balances in Microbial Fuel Cells Reveal Temporary Bacterial Storage Behavior During Electricity Generation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 2915–2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Schröder, U. Anodic Electron Transfer Mechanisms in Microbial Fuel Cells and Their Energy Efficiency. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 2619–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Li, F.; Li, Y.; Sun, L.; Chen, X.; An, X.; Yin, C.; Cao, Y.; Wu, H.; Song, H. Modular Engineering Intracellular NADH Regeneration Boosts Extracellular Electron Transfer of Shewanella Oneidensis MR-1. ACS Synth. Biol. 2018, 7, 885–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Yadav, R.; Chattopadhyay, B.; Kiran, R.; Yadav, A.; Bachhawat, A.K.; Patil, S.A. Microbial Electrosynthesis from Carbon Dioxide Feedstock Linked to Yeast Growth for the Production of High-Value Isoprenoids. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 363, 127906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Alkotaini, B.; Abdellaoui, S.; Hasan, K.; Grattieri, M.; Quah, T.; Cai, R.; Yuan, M.; Minteer, S.D. Sustainable Bioelectrosynthesis of the Bioplastic Polyhydroxybutyrate: Overcoming Substrate Requirement for NADH Regeneration. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 4909–4915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Yukesh Kannah, R.; Dinesh Kumar, M.; Kavitha, S.; Rajesh Banu, J.; Kumar Tyagi, V.; Rajaguru, P.; Kumar, G. Production and Recovery of Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) from Waste Streams—A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 366, 128203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Sohn, Y.J.; Son, J.; Lim, H.J.; Lim, S.H.; Park, S.J. Valorization of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production: Status and Perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 360, 127575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zytner, P.; Kumar, D.; Elsayed, A.; Mohanty, A.; Ramarao, B.V.; Misra, M. A Review on Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Production through the Use of Lignocellulosic Biomass. RSC Sustain. 2023, 1, 2120–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Renju; Singh, R. (Bio)Electrochemical System: A Systematic Approach from Agricultural Waste to Sewage Wastewater Treatment with Nutrients and Hydrogen Recovery. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 457, 142387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Koller, M.; Obruča, S. Biotechnological Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoates from Glycerol: A Review. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2022, 42, 102333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhou, M.; Freguia, S.; Dennis, P.G.; Keller, J.; Rabaey, K. Development of Bioelectrocatalytic Activity Stimulates Mixed-culture Reduction of Glycerol in a Bioelectrochemical System. Microb. Biotechnol. 2015, 8, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Dennis, P.G.; Harnisch, F.; Yeoh, Y.K.; Tyson, G.W.; Rabaey, K. Dynamics of Cathode-Associated Microbial Communities and Metabolite Profiles in a Glycerol-Fed Bioelectrochemical System. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 4008–4014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Leong, Y.K.; Show, P.L.; Lan, J.C.-W.; Loh, H.-S.; Lam, H.L.; Ling, T.C. Economic and Environmental Analysis of PHAs Production Process. Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy 2017, 19, 1941–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Al Rowaihi, I.S.; Paillier, A.; Rasul, S.; Karan, R.; Grötzinger, S.W.; Takanabe, K.; Eppinger, J. Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) Production in an Integrated Electromicrobial Setup: Investigation under Stress-Inducing Conditions. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0196079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Bian, Y.; Leininger, A.M.; Zhang, W.; Liang, Y.; Ren, Z.J. Co-Valorization of Food Waste and CO2 to Produce Volatile Fatty Acids Using Liter-Scale Tubular Microbial Electrosynthesis Cells. ACS ES&T Eng. 2024, 4, 2243–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Bian, B.; Bajracharya, S.; Xu, J.; Pant, D.; Saikaly, P.E. Microbial Electrosynthesis from CO2: Challenges, Opportunities and Perspectives in the Context of Circular Bioeconomy. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 302, 122863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Song, Y.E.; Kim, C.; Li, S.; Baek, J.; Seol, E.; Park, C.; Na, J.-G.; Lee, J.; Oh, Y.-K.; Kim, J.R. Supply of Proton Enhances CO Electrosynthesis for Acetate and Volatile Fatty Acid Productions. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 320, 124245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Humphreys, C.M.; Minton, N.P. Advances in Metabolic Engineering in the Microbial Production of Fuels and Chemicals from C1 Gas. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018, 50, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. ter Heijne, A.; Pereira, M.A.; Pereira, J.; Sleutels, T. Electron Storage in Electroactive Biofilms. Trends. Biotechnol. 2021, 39, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Srikanth, S.; Venkateswar Reddy, M.; Venkata Mohan, S. Microaerophilic Microenvironment at Biocathode Enhances Electrogenesis with Simultaneous Synthesis of Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) in Bioelectrochemical System (BES). Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 125, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Rengasamy, K.; Ranaivoarisoa, T.O.; Singh, R.; Bose, A. Improving microbial electrosynthesis of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) from CO2 by Rhodopseudomonas palustris TIE-1 using an immobilized iron complex modified cathode. bioRxiv 2017, 214577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Pepè Sciarria, T.; Batlle-Vilanova, P.; Colombo, B.; Scaglia, B.; Balaguer, M.D.; Colprim, J.; Puig, S.; Adani, F. Bio-Electrorecycling of Carbon Dioxide into Bioplastics. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 4058–4066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Zhang, K.; Zhou, Y.; Song, T.; Xie, J. Bioplastic Production from the Microbial Electrosynthesis of Acetate through CO2 Reduction. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 15978–15986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Gurav, R.; Bhatia, S.K.; Moon, Y.-M.; Choi, T.-R.; Jung, H.-R.; Yang, S.-Y.; Song, H.-S.; Jeon, J.-M.; Yoon, J.-J.; Kim, Y.-G.; et al. One-Pot Exploitation of Chitin Biomass for Simultaneous Production of Electricity, n-Acetylglucosamine and Polyhydroxyalkanoates in Microbial Fuel Cell Using Novel Marine Bacterium Arenibacter Palladensis YHY2. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 209, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Nguyen, H.T.T.; Jadhav, D.A.; Eisa, T.; Nguyen, H.Y.; Le, G.T.H.; Le, T.T.Q.; Jae, M.-R.; Khoo, K.S.; Yang, E.; Chae, K.-J. Sustainable Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to High-Value Antioxidant Astaxanthin through Microbial Electrosynthesis-Assisted Microalgae Cultivation. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024, 190, 212–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Díaz-Rullo Edreira, S.; Vasiliadou, I.A.; Prado, A.; Espada, J.J.; Wattiez, R.; Leroy, B.; Martínez, F.; Puyol, D. Elucidating Metabolic Tuning of Mixed Purple Phototrophic Bacteria Biofilms in Photoheterotrophic Conditions through Microbial Photo-Electrosynthesis. Commun. Biol. 2024, 7, 1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. San-Martín, M.I.; Leicester, D.D.; Heidrich, E.S.; Alonso, R.M.; Mateos, R.; Escapa, A. Bioelectrochemical Systems for Energy Valorization of Waste Streams. In Energy Systems and Environment; Intechopen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  138. Patel, D.; Bapodra, S.L.; Madamwar, D.; Desai, C. Electroactive Bacterial Community Augmentation Enhances the Performance of a Pilot Scale Constructed Wetland Microbial Fuel Cell for Treatment of Textile Dye Wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 332, 125088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Li, S.; Song, Y.E.; Baek, J.; Im, H.S.; Sakuntala, M.; Kim, M.; Park, C.; Min, B.; Kim, J.R. Bioelectrosynthetic Conversion of CO2 Using Different Redox Mediators: Electron and Carbon Balances in a Bioelectrochemical System. Energies 2020, 13, 2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Escapa, A.; San-Martín, M.I.; Mateos, R.; Morán, A. Scaling-up of Membraneless Microbial Electrolysis Cells (MECs) for Domestic Wastewater Treatment: Bottlenecks and Limitations. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 180, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Alonso, R.M.; San-Martín, M.I.; Sotres, A.; Escapa, A. Graphene Oxide Electrodeposited Electrode Enhances Start-up and Selective Enrichment of Exoelectrogens in Bioelectrochemical Systems. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure and classification of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), highlighting their structural and compositional diversity. Modified figure from [22].
Figure 1. Structure and classification of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), highlighting their structural and compositional diversity. Modified figure from [22].
Bioengineering 12 00616 g001
Figure 2. Evolution of bioelectrochemical system (BES) configurations for value-added product generation. The figure illustrates different configurations utilized in the evolution of bioelectrochemical systems. (A) displays both a microbial fuel cell (MFC) and a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) configuration. In both, the anodic reaction is the same: the oxidation of organic compounds to CO2. However, they differ in the cathodic reduction reaction: in an MFC, the cathode typically results in the production of H2O (generating electricity), while, in an MEC, an external power source is applied to drive the reduction at the cathode, often resulting in H2 production. (B) presents an MFC and MEC configuration featuring two catalyzed electrodes, highlighting the first instance of electrosynthesis for methane generation from H2 and CO2 or CH4 at the cathode. (C) depicts an electrosynthesis (MES) reactor designed for the production of more complex organic molecules, such as volatile fatty acids (VFA) or PHA, from CO2. In the latter setup, the significance of microorganisms suspended in the bulk liquid for chain elongation and PHA production is emphasized.
Figure 2. Evolution of bioelectrochemical system (BES) configurations for value-added product generation. The figure illustrates different configurations utilized in the evolution of bioelectrochemical systems. (A) displays both a microbial fuel cell (MFC) and a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) configuration. In both, the anodic reaction is the same: the oxidation of organic compounds to CO2. However, they differ in the cathodic reduction reaction: in an MFC, the cathode typically results in the production of H2O (generating electricity), while, in an MEC, an external power source is applied to drive the reduction at the cathode, often resulting in H2 production. (B) presents an MFC and MEC configuration featuring two catalyzed electrodes, highlighting the first instance of electrosynthesis for methane generation from H2 and CO2 or CH4 at the cathode. (C) depicts an electrosynthesis (MES) reactor designed for the production of more complex organic molecules, such as volatile fatty acids (VFA) or PHA, from CO2. In the latter setup, the significance of microorganisms suspended in the bulk liquid for chain elongation and PHA production is emphasized.
Bioengineering 12 00616 g002
Table 1. Microorganisms producing PHAs and exhibiting bioelectrochemical activity.
Table 1. Microorganisms producing PHAs and exhibiting bioelectrochemical activity.
DomainMicroorganismPHAs *Bioelectrochemical BehaviorReferences
Bacteria (Prokaryotes)
BurkholderiaceaeBurkholderia cepaciascl- and mcl-PHAsElectrotrophic[5,51]
Cupriavidus metalliduransscl-PHAsElectrotrophic[5,52]
Cupriavidus necatorscl-PHAsElectrotrophic[3,5]
ClostridiaceaeClostridium butyricumscl-PHAsElectrotrophic[5,53]
Clostridium pasteurianumscl-PHAsExoelectrogenic[5,53]
ComamonadaceaeComamonas testosteroniscl-PHAsExoelectrogenic[5,54]
MicrococcaceaeMicrococcus luteusscl-PHAsElectrotrophic[5,55]
PropionibacteriaceaePropionibacterium spp.scl-PHAsElectrotrophic[5,56]
PseudomonadaceaePseudomonas aeruginosamcl-PHAsExoelectrogenic[5,57]
Pseudomonas alcaliphilamcl-PHAsExoelectrogenic[5,58]
RhodobacteraceaeRhodopseudomonas palustrisscl-PHAsExoelectrogenic[5,59]
Cyanobacteria (Prokaryote)
SynechococcaceaeSynechococcus elongatusPHBExoelectrogenic[60,61]
SpirulinaceaeSpirulina platensisPHBExoelectrogenic[62,63,64]
Algae (Eukaryotes)
ChlorellaceaeChlorella vulgarisPHBExoelectrogenic and Electrotrophic[62,65,66]
* Note: scl-PHAs—short-chain-length PHAs; mcl-PHAs—medium-chain-length PHAs.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chamizo-Ampudia, A.; Alonso, R.M.; Ariza-Carmona, L.; Sanchiz, Á.; San-Martín, M.I. A Review of Bioelectrochemical Strategies for Enhanced Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production. Bioengineering 2025, 12, 616. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060616

AMA Style

Chamizo-Ampudia A, Alonso RM, Ariza-Carmona L, Sanchiz Á, San-Martín MI. A Review of Bioelectrochemical Strategies for Enhanced Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production. Bioengineering. 2025; 12(6):616. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060616

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chamizo-Ampudia, Alejandro, Raúl. M. Alonso, Luisa Ariza-Carmona, África Sanchiz, and María Isabel San-Martín. 2025. "A Review of Bioelectrochemical Strategies for Enhanced Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production" Bioengineering 12, no. 6: 616. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060616

APA Style

Chamizo-Ampudia, A., Alonso, R. M., Ariza-Carmona, L., Sanchiz, Á., & San-Martín, M. I. (2025). A Review of Bioelectrochemical Strategies for Enhanced Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production. Bioengineering, 12(6), 616. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060616

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop