Next Article in Journal
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Hydrology in 2015
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison between Snow Albedo Obtained from Landsat TM, ETM+ Imagery and the SPOT VEGETATION Albedo Product in a Mediterranean Mountainous Site
Previous Article in Journal
Streamflow Trends and Responses to Climate Variability and Land Cover Change in South Dakota
Previous Article in Special Issue
Performance and Uncertainty Evaluation of Snow Models on Snowmelt Flow Simulations over a Nordic Catchment (Mistassibi, Canada)
Article

Spatial Heterogeneity of Snow Density and Its Influence on Snow Water Equivalence Estimates in a Large Mountainous Basin

1
Snow and Avalanche Laboratory, Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173480, Bozeman, MT 59717-3480, USA
2
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Juraj Parajka
Hydrology 2016, 3(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology3010003
Received: 28 October 2015 / Revised: 14 December 2015 / Accepted: 31 December 2015 / Published: 12 January 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Snow Hydrology)
Accurate representation of the spatial distribution of snow water equivalent (SWE) in mountainous basins is critical for furthering the understanding of snow as a water resource, especially in the Western United States. To estimate the spatial distribution and total volume of SWE over mountainous basins, previous work has either assumed uniform snow density or used simple approaches to estimate density. This study uses over 1000 direct measurements of SWE and snow depth (from which density was calculated) in sampling areas that were physiographically proportional to a large (207 km2) mountainous basin in southwest Montana. Using these data, modeled spatial distributions of density and depth were developed and combined to obtain estimates of total basin SWE. Six estimates of SWE were obtained using varying combinations of the distributed depth and density models and were compared to the average of three different models that utilized direct measurements of SWE. Models utilizing direct SWE measurements varied by approximately 1% around their mean, while SWE estimates derived from combined depth and density models varied by over 14% around the same mean. This study highlights the need to carefully consider the spatial variability of density when estimating SWE based on snow depth in these environments. View Full-Text
Keywords: SWE; density; modeling; spatial; variability SWE; density; modeling; spatial; variability
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Wetlaufer, K.; Hendrikx, J.; Marshall, L. Spatial Heterogeneity of Snow Density and Its Influence on Snow Water Equivalence Estimates in a Large Mountainous Basin. Hydrology 2016, 3, 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology3010003

AMA Style

Wetlaufer K, Hendrikx J, Marshall L. Spatial Heterogeneity of Snow Density and Its Influence on Snow Water Equivalence Estimates in a Large Mountainous Basin. Hydrology. 2016; 3(1):3. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology3010003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wetlaufer, Karl, Jordy Hendrikx, and Lucy Marshall. 2016. "Spatial Heterogeneity of Snow Density and Its Influence on Snow Water Equivalence Estimates in a Large Mountainous Basin" Hydrology 3, no. 1: 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology3010003

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop