Next Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Changes in Extreme Temperature and Associated Large-Scale Climate Driving Forces in Chongqing
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Global TCWV and AI Hybrid Model Prediction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Alternative Hydraulic Modeling Method Based on Recurrent Neural Networks: From HEC-RAS to AI

by
Andrei Mihai Rugină
1,2
1
Doctoral School, Faculty of Hydrotechnical, Department of Hydrotechnical Engineering, Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest, 020396 Bucharest, Romania
2
S.C. AQUAPROIECT S.A., 060031 Bucharest, Romania
Hydrology 2025, 12(8), 207; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology12080207
Submission received: 6 July 2025 / Revised: 1 August 2025 / Accepted: 3 August 2025 / Published: 6 August 2025

Abstract

The present study explores the application of RNNs for the prediction and propagation of flood waves along a section of the Bârsa River, Romania, as a fast alternative to classical hydraulic models, aiming to identify new ways to alert the population. Five neural architectures were analyzed as follows: S-RNN, LSTM, GRU, Bi-LSTM, and Bi-GRU. The input data for the neural networks were derived from 2D hydraulic simulations conducted using HEC-RAS software, which provided the necessary training data for the models. It should be mentioned that the input data for the hydraulic model are synthetic hydrographs, derived from the statistical processing of recorded floods. Performance evaluation was based on standard metrics such as NSE, R2 MSE, and RMSE. The results indicate that all studied networks performed well, with NSE and R2 values close to 1, thus validating their capacity to reproduce complex hydrological dynamics. Overall, all models yielded satisfactory results, making them useful tools particularly the GRU and Bi-GRU architectures, which showed the most balanced behavior, delivering low errors and high stability in predicting peak discharge, water level, and flood wave volume. The GRU and Bi-GRU networks yielded the best performance, with RMSE values below 1.45, MAE under 0.3, and volume errors typically under 3%. On the other hand, LSTM architecture exhibited the most significant instability and errors, especially in estimating the flood wave volume, often having errors exceeding 9% in some sections. The study concludes by identifying several limitations, including the heavy reliance on synthetic data and its local applicability, while also proposing solutions for future analyses, such as the integration of real-world data and the expansion of the methodology to diverse river basins thus providing greater significance to RNN models. The final conclusions highlight that RNNs are powerful tools in flood risk management, contributing to the development of fast and efficient early warning systems for extreme hydrological and meteorological events.
Keywords: deep learning; recurrent neuronal networks; HEC-RAS; flood modeling; flood prediction deep learning; recurrent neuronal networks; HEC-RAS; flood modeling; flood prediction

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rugină, A.M. Alternative Hydraulic Modeling Method Based on Recurrent Neural Networks: From HEC-RAS to AI. Hydrology 2025, 12, 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology12080207

AMA Style

Rugină AM. Alternative Hydraulic Modeling Method Based on Recurrent Neural Networks: From HEC-RAS to AI. Hydrology. 2025; 12(8):207. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology12080207

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rugină, Andrei Mihai. 2025. "Alternative Hydraulic Modeling Method Based on Recurrent Neural Networks: From HEC-RAS to AI" Hydrology 12, no. 8: 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology12080207

APA Style

Rugină, A. M. (2025). Alternative Hydraulic Modeling Method Based on Recurrent Neural Networks: From HEC-RAS to AI. Hydrology, 12(8), 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology12080207

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop