Previous Issue
Volume 5, September
 
 

Standards, Volume 5, Issue 4 (December 2025) – 1 article

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 846 KB  
Review
Standardized Design Metrics and Policy Integration for Phytoremediation Systems in Water Contaminant Management
by Trung Quang Nguyen, Hung Xuan Nguyen, Minh Quang Bui, Duc Hung Pham, Hoang Minh Truong, Tung Ngoc Nguyen, Tao Minh Hoang and Minh Ngoc Truong
Standards 2025, 5(4), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/standards5040025 - 25 Sep 2025
Abstract
Phytoremediation has emerged as a sustainable and cost-effective strategy for mitigating contamination in soil and water systems, utilizing plants and their associated microbial consortia to uptake, degrade, or immobilize pollutants. This review synthesizes findings from over 100 peer-reviewed publications and case studies to [...] Read more.
Phytoremediation has emerged as a sustainable and cost-effective strategy for mitigating contamination in soil and water systems, utilizing plants and their associated microbial consortia to uptake, degrade, or immobilize pollutants. This review synthesizes findings from over 100 peer-reviewed publications and case studies to identify key parameters influencing phytoremediation efficiency, including contaminant bioavailability, chemical speciation, concentration levels (ranging from trace to >100 mg/L), plant species suitability, hydraulic retention time, and temperature ranges (10–35 °C). Despite its proven potential, the absence of standardized design frameworks limits consistent implementation and cross-site performance comparability. To address this, the study proposes a conceptual system design framework supported by measurable performance metrics—such as pollutant removal efficiency (often >70% for heavy metals) and biomass uptake capacity. The review further examines regulatory and policy gaps that hinder the technology’s integration into national remediation strategies, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. It underscores the need for technical guidelines, regulatory benchmarks, and protocols for post-treatment biomass management to enable safe, effective, and scalable deployment. By advocating a multi-stakeholder, evidence-based approach, the study aims to bridge the gap between scientific innovation and environmental governance, positioning phytoremediation as a viable tool for pollution control, ecosystem restoration, and alignment with global sustainability targets. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop