Next Article in Journal
Field-Based Feasibility Assessment of Sorghum, Maize and Soybean for the Phytomanagement of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Mining Soils in a Living Lab Platform
Previous Article in Journal
Neurobehavioral and Molecular Alterations Following Single and Combined Exposure to Chlorpyrifos and PFHxS in Developing Zebrafish (Danio rerio)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Investigating Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs) in China: A Review of Occurrences, Determination Techniques, Human Exposure Routes, Toxicity, and Risk Assessments

1
College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, China
2
Zhejiang Collaborative Innovation Center for Full-Process Monitoring and Green Governance of Emerging Contaminants, Interdisciplinary Research Academy (IRA), Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou 310015, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2026, 14(7), 567; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14070567
Submission received: 24 April 2026 / Revised: 17 June 2026 / Accepted: 23 June 2026 / Published: 27 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Exposome Analysis and Risk Assessment)

Abstract

Chlorinated paraffins (CPs) are recognized as a novel class of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and are categorized into short- (SCCPs, C10–13), medium- (MCCPs, C14–17), and long- (LCCPs, C≥18) chain CPs considering the carbon-chain length. Among them, SCCPs possess lower molecular weights, higher vapor pressures, and greater water solubilities compared to their longer-chain counterparts (MCCPs and LCCPs), which promote their environmental release. Consequently, SCCPs were designated as POPs of concern under the Stockholm Convention in 2017. This review concludes the recent research progress of SCCPs in China from 2015 to present, and we present a comprehensive overview of SCCP concentrations, encompassing diverse environmental matrices and human tissues, for example, air, water, soil, sediments, biota, food, human placenta, breast milk, blood, and organs (fat, kidney, liver, brain, bone, etc.). Whereafter, we summarize the development of SCCPs determination methods, benefiting from quantifying relative carbon-chain length and chlorine content of SCCPs correctly. Moreover, toxicity, toxicokinetics, and adverse health effects of SCCPs in humans from China are concluded and discussed. Meanwhile, we review the existing control and treatment technologies for SCCPs. Lastly, we describe some noteworthy and prospective issues that are worthy of further study. In the future, the relevant studies are still necessary to keep up with consecutive monitoring and evaluation of SCCP levels and relative potential health impacts in China.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Chlorinated paraffins (CPs) are high-production-volume industrial chemicals comprising complex mixtures of polychlorinated n-alkanes (general formula of CnH2n+2−xClx) with a chlorine content of 30~72 wt%. CPs are classified by carbon-chain length into short-chain (SCCPs, C10–13), medium-chain (MCCPs, C14–17), and long-chain (LCCPs, C≥18) groups, and are extensively utilized as plasticizers and flame retardants in polymers, lubricants, sealants, and coatings [1,2]. Their inherent persistence, bioaccumulation potential, toxicity, and capacity for long-range environmental transport have led to the listing of CPs as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) under the Stockholm Convention [3]. Global production has been substantial, and cumulative releases have resulted in their widespread detection in air, water, soil, and biota [4,5,6,7,8]. Moreover, human and wildlife exposure occurs primarily via ingestion, raising serious concerns over developmental, neurological, endocrine, and metabolic toxicity [9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
Among CPs, SCCPs possess distinct properties—such as lower molecular weight, higher volatility, and greater environmental mobility—that enhance their dispersal and bioavailability [16,17,18]. Historically, produced in the largest volume among POPs, SCCPs have faced global restrictions that have accelerated the use of MCCPs and LCCPs as substitutes, despite growing recognition of their similar persistence, bioaccumulation potential, and toxicity concerns [19]. Indeed, regulatory attention is expanding, as evidenced by the European proposal to restrict MCCPs and the classification of SCCPs as a Group 2B potential carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [20].
While global production is shifting, China remains a pivotal region for understanding the lifecycle and impact of SCCPs. China is the world’s largest producer and consumer, with ongoing significant use despite international phase-outs [21,22]. This substantial industrial footprint, coupled with intensive applications, has resulted in severe contamination. SCCPs are detected at concentrations 2~3 orders of magnitude higher than other legacy pollutants (e.g., PAHs, PBDEs) in human blood from China, suggesting a disproportionate exposure burden [22]. In response, the Chinese government has explicitly listed SCCPs in its national “New Action Plan for New Pollutants Management” (2022), highlighting them as a priority for control [21]. Consequently, China presents a critical and urgent case study: a major emission source, a hotspot for human and ecological exposure, and a key jurisdiction enacting regulatory action. Understanding the specific distribution, pathways, health risks, and management challenges of SCCPs within China is therefore not only of regional importance but also essential for evaluating the effectiveness of global POP governance and informing mitigation strategies worldwide.
Although recent years have seen a remarkable increase in research on CPs (Figure 1: obtained by searching the Web of Science database using the topics “chlorinated paraffins”, “short-chain chlorinated paraffins”, “medium-chain chlorinated paraffins”, and “long-chain chlorinated paraffins” for the period 2015–2025, up to 31 December 2025), published reviews have largely focused on global perspectives, analytical methods, environmental fate, or toxicology [1,2,3,9,20,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. For example, Chen et al. focused on biological occurrence, bioaccumulation, transmission, and metabolism of CPs [1]. Yu et al. summarized the sample treatment, instrumental characterizations, occurrence, and distribution of CPs in food samples [20]. Mu et al. reviewed the toxicity and underlying molecular mechanisms of SCCPs from a toxicological perspective [23]. Kalinowska et al. mainly focused on analytical procedures for SCCP determination [26]. Glüge et al. summarized the global production, utilization, and emission of SCCPs [28]. Despite the existence of several comprehensive reviews on CPs, a critical knowledge gap remains regarding the China-specific context, where SCCP production, usage patterns, and environmental burdens differ substantially from those in other regions. In particular, this review aims to address the following crucial China-centric scientific questions: (1) Why are SCCP concentrations in multiple environmental and human matrices in China frequently higher than those reported in Europe and North America? (2) How do China’s unique industrial structure, including e-waste recycling, plastic manufacturing, and informal sectors, cause the spatial distribution and exposure pathways of SCCPs? (3) What are the major uncertainties and regional data gaps that limit accurate risk assessment in China? (4) How effective are current Chinese regulatory actions compared to global control frameworks, and what challenges remain? To address these questions, the present review critically summarizes the literature from 2015 to 2025, with the following objectives: (1) to describe the current distribution and levels of SCCPs across key environmental matrices (air, water, soil, sediment) and human samples (blood, milk, tissues) in China; (2) to evaluate advances and challenges in analytical methods for the accurate determination of SCCPs in diverse samples; (3) to review the evidence linking SCCP exposure to potential adverse health effects; and (4) to outline the current regulatory framework and management strategies for SCCPs in China, identifying progress and remaining challenges. Consequently, this work aims to clarify the specific framework of the SCCP issue in China, identify critical research needs, and support the development of effective monitoring and regulatory interventions to protect human and environmental health.

2. Levels and Distribution of SCCPs in Environmental Matrices of China

This section summarizes SCCP monitoring data from Chinese environmental matrices published between 2015 and 2025. We organize the analysis by individual matrices—air (Section 2.1), water (Section 2.2), soil (Section 2.3), sediment (Section 2.4), biota (Section 2.5), and food (Section 2.6)—because SCCP distribution, transport, and accumulation differ markedly among media. For each matrix, we provide national concentration ranges and hotspots, describe spatial gradients, and, where data permit, compare Chinese levels with global benchmarks, as summarized in Table 1 (compiled from previous studies reported in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7). Previous studies have extensively summarized the environmental occurrence of SCCPs in China [25,30]. Among all media, the atmosphere is considered an extremely pivotal medium for the long-distance transport of SCCPs.

2.1. Air

Owing to their environmental persistence and semi-volatility, SCCPs readily enter the atmosphere at ambient temperature. They partition between gaseous and particulate phases, with monitoring data indicating a predominance in the gas phase, where concentrations exceed those in the particle phase by a factor of 0.46 to 45.7 [31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. The atmosphere is a crucial medium for the long-range environmental transport of SCCPs, and the occurrence and distribution of SCCPs in air across China are listed in Table 2. Atmospheric SCCP concentrations across China range from 0.13 to 1442 ng/m3, with the highest levels observed in Zibo city. Atmospheric SCCP levels exhibit distinct seasonal variations, primarily governed by temperature-driven gas–particle partitioning. Overall concentrations are typically higher in summer than in winter [36,38,39] and spring [31]. In contrast, the fraction associated with particles often shows an inverse trend [40]. This phase-specific seasonality elucidates the critical influence of temperature, with warmer conditions promoting the volatilization of SCCPs from particles into the gas phase [41]. For instance, in the Yangtze River Delta region, SCCP concentrations ranged from 6.1–63 ng/m3 in summer to 6.2–42 ng/m3 in winter [38]. A study in Jinan reported SCCP concentrations in PM2.5 ranging from 9.80 to 105 ng/m3, showing a positive correlation with PM2.5 levels and a negative correlation with ambient temperature, further revealing their adhesion to atmospheric particles [40].
Noticeably, spatial variability in atmospheric SCCP concentrations across China is significant and driven by regional disparities in production/consumption, physicochemical properties, and meteorological conditions [30]. In high-concentration regions, the highest levels are identified in northern and central China. Coastal areas generally present higher concentrations than central and western regions, consistent with higher GDP per capita, population density, and the geographic distribution of manufacturing plants [24]. The concentration rank is generally eastern China > northeastern China > southern China. Meanwhile, comparatively lower levels of SCCPs are found in the atmosphere of southwestern China, northwestern China, and marine areas. Background sites, such as Shergyla Mountain on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (130–1300 ng/m3), show concentrations up to one order of magnitude lower than those in emission zones like Lhasa (1100–14,440 ng/m3), highlighting the decisive impact of local industrial activities [42].
SCCPs are also prevalent in indoor environments, where distribution patterns are influenced by specific indoor sources such as emissions from decorative materials, furnishings, and building materials containing halogenated flame retardants [43,44,45,46]. Indoor dust acts as a reservoir for these semi-volatile compounds, leading to long-term human exposure. Concentrations indoors often exceed those of outdoors. For example, in Beijing, mean indoor SCCP levels in PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 were 61.1, 31.4, and 20.7 ng/m3, respectively, significantly higher than outdoor concentrations [34]. Similarly, SCCP levels on interior window films in Beijing offices (337–114,000 ng/m3) exceeded those on exterior films, with a gradient of offices > residential buildings > dormitories [33]. While general indoor health risks have been studied, significant occupational hazards from activities like interior finishing (e.g., cutting, sanding) remain relatively overlooked [47,48]. These processes generate abundant particulate matter that can adsorb SCCPs, posing an inhalation risk, a concern amplified by growing construction activity, which expands and prolongs workforce exposure [49,50,51]. Monitoring of complete interior finishing processes has confirmed the release and distribution of SCCPs into multiple media, including air (PM10, TSP) and dust [52]. Furthermore, extremely elevated SCCP levels have been reported in specific hotspots such as e-waste recycling areas and CP production plants, with concentrations markedly higher than those reported in regions like Sweden, Australia, and Canada [38,43,44,45,46,53]. Compared to reported atmospheric SCCP levels in Europe and North America, concentrations in Chinese urban and industrial regions are often one to two orders of magnitude higher. Such a discrepancy can be ascribed to the intensive production and consumption of CPs, as well as the manufacturing agglomeration in eastern China. Additionally, weaker historical emission controls and rapid urbanization have further increased atmospheric burdens.
Table 2. SCCP concentrations in air samples collected across various locations in China.
Table 2. SCCP concentrations in air samples collected across various locations in China.
RegionLocationSampleMatricesConcentration (ng/m3)Detection
Method
Sampling TimeRef.
China10 Chinese cities aAmbient airParticle phase (PM2.5)1.98–274HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2013–2014[54]
Eastern China3 cities in the Yangtze River Delta bAmbient airGas phase6.08–63.2GC × GC-ECNI-LRMS2011–2012[38]
ZiboInside and outside a CP production plantGas and particle phases129–1442 (inside);
89.0–333 (outside)
MS-ECNI2016[35]
JinanAmbient airParticle phase (PM2.5)9.80–105GC-ECNI-MS2016[40]
Zhoushan islandAmbient airGas phase57–208GC × GC-ECNI-MSNA[55]
Southern ChinaShenzhenAmbient airGas and particle phases1.11–39.8UPLC-ESI-QTOFMS2013–2014[5]
GuangzhouIndoor airParticle phase6.20–17.8HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2017[56]
9 cities in the Pearl River Delta cIndoor and outdoor airParticle phase2.90–51.8 (indoor);
1.60–32.5 (outdoor)
GC-ECNI-MS2017[57]
6 cities in the Pearl River Delta dAmbient airParticle phase (PM2.5)0.832–109UPLC-QTOF-MS2018[58]
6 cities in the Pearl River DeltaOutdoor airSubmicron particulate matter (PM1)8.7–89UPLC-QTOF-MS2018[59]
Northern ChinaBeijingIndoor airGas phase60.0–1350HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2013–2014[33]
BeijingIndoor airGas phase9.77–966GC-TOF-HRMS2016[46]
BeijingIndoor air and outdoor airParticle phase (PM10)38.3–87.7 (indoor);
16.9–28.8 (outdoor)
GC × GC-ECNI-HRTOF-MS2016[34]
Northeastern ChinaDalianAmbient airGas and particle phases15.1–66.4 (2010);
65.3–91.0 (2016)
HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2010 and 2016[37]
DalianAmbient airGas and particle phases16.2–168HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2016[32]
DalianAmbient airGas phase4.04–78.0HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2016–2017[60]
Southwestern ChinaLhasa on the Tibetan PlateauAmbient airGas phase1.10–14.4GC-ECNI-LRMS 2012–2015[42]
China Sea regionsBohai SeaAmbient airGas and particle phases3.31–30.4GC-QTOF/NCI-HRMS2016[31]
Background regionShergyla Mountain on the Tibetan PlateauAmbient airGas phase0.13–1.27GC-ECNI-LRMS2012–2015[42]
a Beijing, Chengdu, Lanzhou, Wuhan, Taiyuan, Guiyang, Xinxiang, Guangzhou, Nanjing, and Shanghai. b Suzhou, Wuxi, and Nantong. c Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan, Zhongshan, Zhuhai, Huizhou, Zhaoqing, and Jiangmen. d Guangzhou, Foshan, Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Zhongshan, and Maoming.

2.2. Water

SCCPs are characterized by low water solubility and high lipophilicity, as indicated by their logarithmic octanol–water partition coefficients (LogKow), which range from 4.01 to 8.67 [47,48]. This property strongly influences their environmental fate, leading to significant association with particles and sediments upon release into aquatic systems [24]. The spatial distribution of SCCPs in water is closely linked to anthropogenic activities such as industrial discharges, sewage treatment plant (STP) effluents, and general human influence, similar to the distribution patterns detected in soil [61,62,63,64,65,66]. It should be noted that monitoring data from Chinese aquatic environments reveal substantial SCCP contamination. SCCP concentrations in surface waters across China obviously range from 4.10 to 65,640 ng/L, with significantly higher levels distinguished in industrialized regions and areas influenced by e-waste recycling activities, as listed in Table 3. Quantitatively, SCCP concentrations in Chinese surface waters (4.1–65,640 ng/L) are generally higher than those reported in Japan (16–360 ng/L) [67], France (50–4000 ng/L) [68], and North America (0.606–1.935 ng/L) [69], but are comparable to those found in industrial regions of the United Kingdom (2000–8000 ng/L) [70]. Industrial wastewater has been identified as a crucial source of SCCPs entering STPs, with the subsequent discharge of effluents driving their occurrence in receiving waters [71].
As shown in Table 3, a distinct spatial gradient of SCCPs is evident within China’s marine waters. SCCP concentrations in the Yellow and Bohai Seas seem to be higher than those in the South China Sea [56,72]. Furthermore, lower levels detected in the central Bohai Sea and Liaodong Bay suggest that SCCPs in this basin likely originate from substantial riverine inputs, particularly along the Shandong Peninsula [31,73]. This pronounced spatial gradient in China indicates higher concentrations in eastern and coastal regions compared to western and inland areas [73,74]. Moreover, urban waterways and regions receiving industrial effluents consistently exhibit higher contamination levels than rural or background sites. However, a comprehensive and robust understanding of the precise spatial dynamics of SCCPs in aquatic systems remains limited by the availability of extensive, high-resolution monitoring data. Future research efforts should prioritize expanding the spatial and temporal scope of sampling to better elucidate sources, transport pathways, and sinks. The SCCP concentrations detected in Chinese freshwater systems tend to be higher than those reported in Japan, France, and North America, indicating the influence of industrial discharge and wastewater treatment limitations. This status reflects the strong relationship between local industrial activities and aquatic contamination in China.
Table 3. SCCP concentrations in Chinese water samples.
Table 3. SCCP concentrations in Chinese water samples.
RegionSiteSampleConcentration (ng/L)Detection
Method
Sampling TimeRef.
Eastern ChinaShanghaiRiver water15.0–1640GC-ECNI-MS2016[75]
The intertidal zone of the Shandong PeninsulaSeawater370–548 (Yellow Sea); 573–1978 (Bohai Sea)HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2017[76]
Xiaoqing RiverRiver water7.4–470GC/NCI-MS2014[62]
Southern ChinaPearl River EstuarySeawater180–460GC-ECNI-LRMS2012–2013[72]
An enclosed freshwater pondPond water61.0 ± 5.50GC-ECNI-MS2014[77]
Northern ChinaSewage treatment plantWastewater27.0–184HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2012[78]
BeijingDrinking water20.0–26.0GC-TOF-HRMS2016[46]
Baiyangdian LakeLake water1563–56,306GC-MS2016[79]
Northeastern ChinaLiaodong BaySeawater4.10–13.1GC-ECNI-MS2012[73]
Pulandian BaySeawater494–1490GC-ECNI-MS2012[80]
Central ChinaThe middle reaches of the Yangtze RiverRiver water1131–65,640GC-MS2016[79]
China sea regionsBohai SeaSeawater11.0–110.0GC-QTOF/NCI-HRMS2016[31]
East China SeaSeawater12.2–430GC-ECNI-MS2019[74]

2.3. Soil

Soil acts as a reservoir for SCCPs, which originate from the long-distance transport and enter soil via multiple pathways under certain conditions and anthropogenic activities, such as atmospheric deposition, wastewater irrigation, and industrial discharges, and relative SCCP concentrations are confirmed in these regions [23,24,25]. As listed in Table 4, SCCP concentrations in soil across China exhibit a range of ND-554,161 ng/g dw, with the highest levels observed in industrial soils. These levels substantially exceed those reported in European countries (0.6–570 ng/g dw) [81,82] and Antarctica (3.5–32.8 ng/g dw) [83]. Major SCCP contamination hotspots are strongly linked to specific human activities, notably e-waste dismantling, industrial manufacturing, and areas influenced by sewage treatment plants. Furthermore, agricultural soils typically exhibit higher SCCP concentrations than ambient soils, and urban areas show higher levels than rural regions, suggesting significant contributions from practices such as wastewater irrigation and sewage sludge application.
The distribution of SCCPs in soil is analogous to that of gaseous SCCPs, with concentrations in northern China exceeding those in eastern, northeastern, and southern regions (Table 4), indicating that atmospheric deposition is a dominant input pathway of SCCPs in soils. Surprisingly, higher SCCP levels can be found in soils from the Yunnan province, located on the southwest border of China, attributed to a combination of local human activities and atmospheric transport [84]. Similarly, detectable SCCP levels on the remote Tibetan Plateau, a high-altitude background region with minimal local emission sources, highlight the role of long-range atmospheric transport [85,86]. This transport and subsequent deposition are amplified in high-altitude regions by the “mountain cold-trapping” effect, where low temperatures and high precipitation promote the condensation and sequestration of SCCPs from the atmosphere [87].
Table 4. SCCP concentrations in Chinese soil samples.
Table 4. SCCP concentrations in Chinese soil samples.
RegionSiteSampleConcentration (ng/g dw)Detection
Method
Sampling TimeRef.
China31 provinces of ChinaAgricultural soil38.7–1609GC-ECNI-LRMS2016[88]
Eastern ChinaShanghaiAmbient soil (background)0.42–420GC-MS2011[89]
ShanghaiAmbient soil (urban)ND-615GC-MS2011[90]
ShanghaiAmbient soil (suburban)ND-679GC-ECNI-MS2011[91]
ShanghaiAgricultural and industrial
surface soils
52.6–237.6 (agricultural);
98.3–977.1 (industrial)
GC-ECNI-LRMS2019–2021[92]
An e-waste dismantling area in TaizhouAmbient soil226–755HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2011[93]
A CP production plant in ZiboAmbient and industrial soil27,508–554,161 (in plant); 102–441 (surrounding environment)GC-ECNI-MS2016[35]
An e-waste dismantling area in TaizhouAmbient and agricultural soil68.5–220,000GC × GC-ECNI-MS2017[94]
The intertidal zone of the Shandong PeninsulaAmbient soil50.1–266HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2017[76]
Liaocheng city of Shandong provinceSurface
farmland soil
5.41–381GC-QTOF-NCI-MS2017[95]
Yangkou chemical industrial park in Jiangsu provinceAmbient and industrial soil37.5–996GC × GC-ECNI-MS2018[61]
ZhoushanSurface soil samples collected from the contaminated area72–3842GC × GC-ECNI-MS2018–2019[55]
Southern ChinaPearl River DeltaAmbient soil1.90–236GC-ECNI-LRMS2009–2010[39]
GuangzhouAmbient and agricultural soil1.45–25.5GC-ECNI-MS2009–2010[96]
GuangzhouAmbient and agricultural soil6.80–541GC-ECNI-MS2012[97]
A CP production plant brownfield site in GuangzhouIndustrial soilND-5090HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS2018[98]
JiangmenElectronic industrial park soil144.4–1160GC-ECNI-LRMS2025[99]
Southwestern ChinaChengduAmbient and agricultural soil0.22–3.26GC-ECNI2014[100]
YunnanAmbient soil79.0–948GC × GC-ECNI-MS2016[84]
Northern ChinaBeijingAgricultural soil160–1450GC-ECNI-LRMS2010[101]
Factories in a non-ferrous metal recycling park located
in Hebei
Surface soil 121–5159GC × GC-ECNI-MS2019[102]
Northeastern ChinaA CP production plant in DalianAmbient and industrial soil1018–1824 (in plant); 24.8–482 (surrounding environment)GC-ECNI-MS2013–2014[65]
Background regionTibetan PlateauAmbient soil81.6 ± 31.1GC-ECNI-MS2012–2014[85]
Tibetan PlateauSoils from the urban landfill and rural dumpsites56.8–1348GC-ECNI-MS2017[103]

2.4. Sediment

Due to their resistance to biodegradation and high hydrophobicity, SCCPs readily accumulate in sediments, posing a persistent risk to aquatic ecosystems and human health [104]. SCCP contamination in Chinese sediments is pronounced, exhibiting remarkable spatial patterns driven by anthropogenic inputs and environmental transport processes. As summarized in Table 5, sediment monitoring data indicate that SCCP concentrations across China range from ND to 397,600 ng/g dw, with the highest level found in contaminated site sediments (8.3–397,600 ng/g dw). These values significantly exceed those reported for Japan (1.3–27.4 ng/g dw) [105], North America (147–410 ng/g dw) [106,107], and several European countries (2–800 ng/g dw) [108,109,110,111]. However, SCCP concentrations are comparable to levels found in industrial areas of the UK [70] and Spain [112,113]. Significant point sources include freshwater sediments in e-waste processing zones and areas receiving discharges from sewage treatment plants (STPs) [71].
Similar to patterns observed in water and air, SCCP levels in sediments decrease from the coast to offshore areas. Nationally, concentrations generally follow the order: northern > southern > northeastern > central > eastern > southwestern > northwestern regions. This variation in SCCP concentrations is further influenced by habitat type, with levels typically higher in freshwater sediments than in marine sediments, consistent with global trends [67,105]. The highest SCCP concentrations are found in estuarine and coastal sediments [105,114,115,116], with levels declining both offshore and with sediment depth [117,118], strongly implicating riverine input as the primary source of marine sediments. Background sites exhibit minimal contamination, with the lowest levels detected in Qinghai Lake on the Tibetan Plateau [119]. The observed distribution is primarily governed by the intensity of local human activities coupled with hydrological and atmospheric transport. Relative SCCP concentrations in sediments near population and industrial centers result from high-emission sources, with SCCPs and MCCPs released into adjacent rivers via wastewater overflow and surface runoff. Long-range atmospheric transport contributes to background contamination even in remote regions, while coastal deposition is dominated by riverine plume dispersal.
The exceptionally high SCCP levels in Chinese soils and sediments, especially near e-waste dismantling and industrial zones, distinguish China from most developed regions, where stricter regulations have reduced environmental accumulation.
Table 5. SCCP concentrations in Chinese sediment samples.
Table 5. SCCP concentrations in Chinese sediment samples.
RegionSiteSampleConcentration (ng/g dw)Detection
Method
Sampling TimeRef.
ChinaChina Coastal EstuariesMarine sediment242–1450GC-ECNI-MS2011[80]
Nine lakesLake sediment59.0–650 ESI-QTOF-MS2013–2019[119]
Urban black odorous rivers flowing through 73 citiesRiver sediment8.3–94,000GC-ECNI-MS2018[120]
Eastern ChinaShanghaiRiver sedimentND-2020GC-ECNI-MS2016[75]
Laizhou BayRiver and marine sediment8.40–2000 (river sediment); 5.10–22.0 (marine sediment)HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2016[121]
The intertidal zone of the Shandong PeninsulaMarine sediment17.6–453HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2017[76]
Jiaojiang River in TaizhouRiver sediment32.5–12,900HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2017[94]
Xiaoqing River in relation to the Laizhou
Bay environment
River sediment9.1–16,000GC-ECNI-MS2014[62]
Southern ChinaPearl River DeltaRiver sediment224–3800GC-ECNI-LRMS2009–2010[122]
PRD, Shenzhen, and Hong KongMarine sedimentND-1540HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2012–2013[105]
Pearl River EstuaryMarine sediment180–620GC-ECNI-LRMS2012–2013[116]
Longtang, QingyuanPond sediment3200–13,700GC-MS2010[123]
An enclosed freshwater pondPond sediment82.0–350,000GC-ECNI-MS2014[77]
Central ChinaHenan section of the Yellow RiverRiver sediment11.8–2792GC-ECNI-LRMS2014[124]
The middle reaches of the Yellow RiverRiver sediment11.6–9760GC × GC-TOFMS2015[125]
The middle reaches of the Yangtze RiverRiver sediment4.19–41.6GC × GC-TOFMS2015[126]
The middle reaches of the Yangtze RiverRiver sediment251.9–397,600GC-MS2015[79]
Northern ChinaBeijingLake sediment1100–8700GC-ECNI-LRMS2010[71]
Haihe River BasinRiver sediment131.83–1767.71GC × GC-TOFMS2021[127]
Northeastern ChinaLiaodong BayMarine sediment65.0–541GC-ECNI-MS2012[73]
Liaohe EstuaryMarine sediment64.9–1683GC-ECNI-MS2010[128]
China Sea areasBohai SeaMarine sediment97.4–1757GC-ECNI-MS2010[114]
East China SeaMarine sediment9.38–41.6NA2012[129]
East China SeaMarine sediment89.6–351GC-ECNI-MS2019[74]

2.5. Biota

The widespread environmental presence, persistence, and lipophilicity of SCCPs facilitate their bioaccumulation and potential biomagnification within organisms, posing significant risks to ecological health and human exposure. Monitoring data in Table 6 confirm the widespread occurrence of SCCPs across diverse food chains, showing that SCCP concentrations in biota range from ND to 30,000 ng/g dw, with the highest level found in freshwater organisms (3.90–30,000 ng/g dw). On average, concentrations are higher in aquatic than in terrestrial organisms. Within aquatic systems, freshwater species typically exhibit higher burdens than their marine counterparts, reflecting the distribution trend observed in sediments. Several studies have elucidated biomagnification potential across various food webs, including estuarine, lacustrine, and remote polar ecosystems. This process is influenced by factors such as the selective transfer of SCCP homologs, feeding ecology, and biotransformation rates within organisms.
Accumulation patterns of SCCPs are primarily governed by habitat and trophic ecology. In aquatic systems, invertebrates accumulate significant levels of SCCPs through direct sediment ingestion and filter feeding. This bioaccumulation at lower trophic levels leads to even higher concentrations in predatory fish, demonstrating trophic transfer [73,130,131]. For terrestrial organisms, particularly plants, uptake occurs primarily through roots and leaves from contaminated soil and air [86,132,133]. Notably, a negative correlation between SCCP concentration and trophic level has been observed in several food chains, suggesting that a trophic dilution effect may occur alongside the biomagnification potential for specific congeners [85].
The spatial distribution of SCCPs in biota across China reflects regional pollution patterns, with organismal burdens highest in eastern and northeastern regions, followed by northern and southern areas. Background sites, such as the Tibetan Plateau, exhibit concentrations one to two orders of magnitude lower than emission zones, yet these levels still substantially exceed those reported for polar regions [83], indicating measurable long-range atmospheric transport. Pollution hotspots are clearly identified, with the highest concentrations found in species such as catfish (11,400–70,400 ng/g dw) inhabiting areas near e-waste recycling sites [134] and in fish from major water supply sources like Dianshan Lake [135]. Consistently higher SCCP concentrations in organisms from estuarine regions compared to other coastal areas reveal the dominant role of riverine inputs from contaminated watersheds [72,116,128]. Significant data gaps remain for central, southwestern, and northwestern China, highlighting the need for expanded spatial monitoring to fully characterize national exposure profiles.
Table 6. Concentrations of SCCPs in biota samples in China (note: lw = liquid weight).
Table 6. Concentrations of SCCPs in biota samples in China (note: lw = liquid weight).
RegionSiteSampleConcentration (ng/g dw)Detection
Method
Sampling TimeRef.
Eastern ChinaAn e-waste dismantling area in TaizhouSnail137–821GC-ECNI-MS2008 and 2010[66]
Yangtze River DeltaSnake1900–19,000 (liver); 1900–22,000 (muscle)APCI-QTOF-MS2011[136]
Yangtze River DeltaBlack-spotted frogsND-9200 ng/g lwAPCI-QTOF-MSNA[137]
Dianshan Lake, ShanghaiFish810–30,000GC-NICI-LRMS2014[135]
ShanghaiPine needleND-13,600GC-NICI-MS2015[133]
Yangtze River DeltaWildlife species69.0–360 (fish);
110–1400 (reptile); 710–3700
APCI-QTOF-MS2017[138]
Crab farms in river
basins along the Yangtze River
Chinese mitten crabs82–1760 ng/g lwGC × GC-MS/MS2019[139]
Southern ChinaAn e-waste recycling site in QingyuanTerrestrial bird species620–17,000GC-ECNI-MS2011–2012[140]
Hong Kong waterMarine organisms15.3–569 (fish); 11.1–72.2 (crustacean)HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2012[131]
Pearl River EstuaryMarine biota74.0–2000GC-ECNI-MS2012–2013[116]
Pearl River EstuaryMarine organisms61.0–930GC-ECNI-LRMS2013[72]
An e-waste recycling site in GuiyuCatfish and pigeon11,400–70,400 (catfish); 4700–11,000 (pigeon)GC-NCI-MS2013[134]
An e-waste contaminated pond in QingyuanAquatic organisms1200–250,000 ng/g lwGC-ECNI-MS2016[141]
Northern ChinaBeijingFish1000–3500HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2010[71]
BeijingPine needle and bark320–4270 (pine bark); 400–4010 (pine needle)GC-ECNI-LRMS2011[132]
Northeastern ChinaLiaohe EstuaryZooplankton, shellfish, shrimp, and fish759–17,000GC-ECNI-MS2009[80]
Liaohe EstuaryMollusk1550–11,900GC-ECNI-MS2010[128]
Liaodong BayOrganisms1600–17,000GC-ECNI-MS2012[73]
A CP production plant in DalianConiferous leaves1281–2197 (in plant); 219–1742 (surrounding)GC-ECNI-MS2013–2014[65]
Liaodong BayFish374–8430GC × GC-ECNI-HRTOF-MS2014[130]
China Sea areasBohai SeaMollusk64.9–5510GC-ECNI-LRMS2009[142]
Bohai SeaBivalve476–3270GC-ECNI-MS2010[114]
Bohai SeaMollusk28.2–6026 GC-NCI-QTOF-LRMS2011–2018[143]
East China SeaOrganisms12.8–15.6 (Zooplankton); 31.0–1819 (Fish); 45.9–83.4 (Shrimp); 79.5–662 (Crab); 131–190 (Shellfish); 35.6–177 (Snail); 34.8–90.0 (Cephalopod);GC-ECNI-MS2019[144]
Yellow Sea (YS), East China Sea (ECS), and South China Sea (SCS)Fish13.5–60.0 (YS); 15.4–63.2 (ECS); 9.30–38.0 (SCS)Stimulated2008–2012[145]
South China Sea (Hong Kong)Marine mammals280–3900 (porpoises); 430–9100 (dolphins)HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2004–2014[146]
Nansha Islands of the South China SeaFish37.9–25,400 ng/g lwGC-ECNI-MS2017[147]
South China SeaMussels, clams, giant tubeworms, slim tubeworms, shrimps,
snails, sea cucumbers, brittle stars, and crabs
572.8–1943.1 ng/g lw (mussels); 169.3–674.2 ng/g lw (clams); 236.0–249.1 ng/g lw (giant tubeworms); 3134.8–4273.5 ng/g lw (slim tubeworms); 644.6–3244.0 ng/g lw (shrimps); 143.6–7189.5 ng/g lw (snails); 2985.3–4527.7 ng/g lw (sea cucumbers);
644.4–3179.2 ng/g lw (brittle stars)
UPLC-ESI-Orbitrap MS2020–2022[148]
Background areaTibetan PlateauFish3.9–107HRGC-ECNI-LRMS2007–2010[149]
Tibetan PlateauBark, needle, lichen, and moss2900–7000 (bark); 2400–6400 (needle);GC-QTOF-NCI-MS2010–2016[86]
Tibetan PlateauPlant, plateau pika, and eagle1400–6100 (liche);
258 ± 126 (plateau pika)
GC-ECNI-MS2012–2014[85]

2.6. Food

Dietary intake is a major route of human exposure to SCCPs, as these pollutants accumulate in various foodstuffs at substantial concentrations. Due to their high lipophilicity and octanol–water partition coefficients (Kow), SCCPs tend to accumulate to a greater extent in animal-derived foods than in plant-based products [150,151,152,153]. As the world’s largest producer and consumer of SCCPs, China faces significant concerns regarding food contamination, prompting extensive research into their occurrence across the food supply. Accordingly, investigations have confirmed the widespread presence of SCCPs in diverse food categories, including eggs, meats, fishes, oils, potatoes, cereals, tea, legumes, and even baby food, as listed in Table 7. The studies summarized in Table 7 comprise 23 publications covering 18 different food types, which are classified into raw ingredients, processed foods, oils, and infant nutrition products. This section concludes the distribution of SCCPs in foods across China to establish a benchmark for future assessment and management.
According to the works listed in Table 7, a clear geographical trend is evident, with higher SCCP concentrations found in foods from eastern and southern China compared to central and western regions, indicating that pollution levels are positively correlated with regional industrial and anthropogenic activity. Concentration levels also vary markedly among food types. For instance, a study of 49 cooking oil samples detected SCCP homologs in 48 of them, with concentrations ranging from 9 to 7500 ng/g, leading to an estimated daily intake of 0.78–38 μg/d (based on a vegetable oil consumption rate of 32.7 g/d) [154]. Similarly, studies of 1710 grain samples from 19 Chinese provinces reported mean concentrations of 343 ng/g ww in grains and 328 ng/g ww in beans, which are generally lower than those in aquatic foods but higher than those in meats [155,156]. Notably, SCCP concentrations in infant foods (0.5–733 ng/g lw) are lower than in other food categories.
Dietary exposure assessments often employ the margin of exposure (MOE) approach, a quantitative tool utilized by scientific committees to evaluate the genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of chemical contaminants. The MOE below a defined threshold indicates a potential health concern [20]. While estimated daily intakes vary, averaging approximately 14.8 μg/day for residents of Beijing, current data suggest that SCCP levels in foods, including baby food, typically result in MOE values above 10,000 [154]. Although this indicates a low immediate risk based on traditional MOE thresholds, the pervasive presence of SCCPs in the food chain necessitates sustained monitoring and comprehensive risk evaluation to safeguard long-term public health.
Table 7. SCCP concentrations in food samples collected across China.
Table 7. SCCP concentrations in food samples collected across China.
Food TypeSiteConcentration Detection
Method
Sampling TimeRef.
EggsSouth China64 ng/g wwGC × GC-ECNI-MS2020[157]
South China46 ng/g wwGC × GC-NCI-MS/MS2022–2023[158]
Jinan, China12.1–76.2 ng/g wwAPCI-qToF-MS2020[159]
Rural Tibetan Plateau and Jiangxi provinceMDL-42,900 ng/g ww (Tibetan Plateau); MDL-649 ng/g ww (Jiangxi province)GC-QTOF-HRMS2018–2021[160]
Meats20 provinces in China129 ± 4.1 ng/g wwGC × GC-ECNI-TOFMS2011[161]
Beijing117 ng/g wwHRGC-ECNI-LRMS2014–2016[162]
Jinan132 ng/g wwGC-ECNI-LRMS2019[151]
Jinan7.6–78.1 ng/g wwAPCI-qToF-MS2020[159]
South China69 ng/g wwGC × GC-ECNI-MS2020[157]
Takeout food online from restaurants in Beijing248 ng/g wwGC × GC-MS/MS2022[163]
FishesSouth China55 ng/g wwGC × GC-ECNI-MS2020[157]
Jinan10.6–123.2 ng/g wwAPCI-qToF-MS2020[159]
Beijing46 ng/g wwHRGC-ECNI-LRMS2014–2016[162]
Aquatic foods and
shellfishes
Beijing60.5 ng/g wwHRGC-ECNI-LRMS2014–2016[162]
18 provinces in China1472 ng/g wwGC × GC-ECNI-TOFMS2017[164]
Jinan, China133 ng/g wwGC-ECNI-MS2019[151]
Jinan, China10.6–123.2 ng/g wwAPCI-qToF-MS2020[159]
South China55 ng/g wwGC × GC-ECNI-MS2020[157]
Oils176 cooking oils and 19 oil containers collected from various markets in ChinaND-16,055 ng/gGC-QTOF-NCI-MS2020[165]
Beijing, Fushun, Hong Kong, Shanghai, and
Shenyang in China
<9–7500 ng/gHRGC-ECNI-HRMS2010, 2012[154]
Butter oil in Tibet, China132 ng/g lipidGC-QTOF-NCI-MS2021[166]
Cereals19 provinces in China343 ng/g wwGC × GC-TOFMS2011[155]
South China17 ng/g wwGC × GC-ECNI-MS2020[157]
Jinan, China38–207 ng/g wwAPCI-qToF-MS2020[159]
Tea11 provinces in China4.99–717 ng/gGC × GC-ECNI-MS/MS2020[167]
WineChinaND-415 ng/mLHPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS2020[168]
NoodlesChina1200 ng/g wwGC × GC-ECNI-MS2021[153]
StarchTakeout food online from restaurants in Beijing77.2 ng/g wwGC × GC-MS/MS2022[163]
CondimentsChina1400 ng/g wwGC × GC-ECNI-MS2021[153]
HoneyNorth Beijing, China37 ng/gGC × GC-ECNI-MS2022[169]
Ready-made mealsBeijing, China22.4–546 ng/g dwGC-TOF-HRMS2016[46]
VegetablesBeijing11.7 ng/g wwHRGC-ECNI-LRMS2014–2016[162]
Jinan, China16.7 ng/g wwGC-ECNI-MS2011[151]
Jinan, ChinaND-4.9 ng/g wwAPCI-qToF-MS2020[159]
South China37 ng/g wwGC × GC-ECNI-MS2020[157]
Takeout food online from restaurants in Beijing42.9 ng/g wwGC × GC-MS/MS2022[163]
FruitsBeijing, China16.4 ng/g wwHRGC-ECNI-LRMS2014–2016[162]
Jinan, China18.9 ng/g wwGC-ECNI-MS2011[151]
Jinan, China7–29.3 ng/g wwAPCI-qToF-MS2020[159]
Legumes19 provinces in China328 ng/g wwGC × GC-TOFMS2011[155]
South China17 ng/g wwGC-ECNI-MS2017–2018[157]
Milk and dairy5 provinces in China750 ng/g lwGC × GC-MS/MS2018[170]
South China38 ng/g wwGC × GC-ECNI-MS2020[157]
Jinan, China19.4–173 ng/g wwAPCI-qToF-MS2020[159]
Baby food12 provinces in China681 ng/g lwGC × GC-ECNI-HRTOFMS2007[171]
16 provinces in China733 ng/g lwGC × GC-ECNI-HRTOFMS2011[171]
16 provinces in China303 ng/g lwGC × GC-ECNI-HRTOFMS2007, 2011[172]
Beijing, China<0.5–54 ng/g lwGC-ECNI-HRMS2007–2010[173]
Shaoxing, China37.9 ng/g lwAPCI-QTOF-HRMS2010[174]
Jiaxing, China28.6 ng/g lwAPCI-QTOF-HRMS2015–2016[174]
Shanghai, China35 ng/g lwAPCI-QTOF-HRMS2015–2016[174]
Beijing, China16.2–20.5 ng/g dwGC-TOF-HRMS2016[46]
China6.22–273 ng/gUPLC-Orbitrap-HRMS2022[175]
Overall, the distinct SCCP pollution patterns observed in China can be attributed to several country-specific reasons: (i) its dominant role as the global producer and consumer of CPs, (ii) the presence of e-waste recycling sites, (iii) high population density and rapid urbanization, and (iv) evolving but still developing regulatory frameworks. These factors collectively result in higher environmental concentrations, more complex exposure pathways, and greater uncertainty in risk assessment compared to other regions.

3. Identification and Characterization of SCCPs

Accurate SCCP quantification remains challenging due to isomeric complexity, matrix interference, and the lack of individual congener standards. This section focuses on three aspects relevant to laboratories and regulators: (1) extraction and cleanup techniques for different sample types, (2) instrumental methods (GC-ECNI-MS, GC × GC-TOF-MS, HRMS, etc.) employed for routine monitoring and research applications, and (3) key technical bottlenecks (e.g., differentiation of SCCPs from MCCPs, inter-laboratory variability) that still need to be addressed. Method performance characteristics are summarized in Table 8 and Table 9.
The concentration distribution of SCCPs varies greatly across environmental matrices, making extraction methods and the cleanup process particularly important. SCCP extraction from environmental samples commonly employs techniques such as accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), liquid–liquid extraction (LLE), and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME). Among these, ASE utilizes high temperature (50–200 °C) and pressure (100–3000 psi) for efficient automated extraction, offering advantages over LLE such as speed, reduced solvent use, and lower labor input. Post-extraction, a cleanup step is essential to purify the organic solvent extract by removing matrix interferences like fats and pigments, thereby simplifying the sample for subsequent instrumental analysis. Moreover, such cleanup can be used to eliminate other compounds chemically similar to CPs, such as PCBs, chlordane, toxaphene, etc. This process can also affect instrumental detection, thus improving the accuracy of quantitative methods [20]. After extraction and cleanup, instrumental methods are employed to identify the types and concentration levels of CPs in various environmental and biological samples. Because CPs are complex mixtures containing thousands of isomers, no single applicable CP standard can be used for semi-quantitative analysis of SCCPs, and only mixed CP standards are currently practicable [176,177]. For routine monitoring of food and human samples, GC-ECNI-MS with appropriate internal standards remains the most practical choice, offering acceptable sensitivity (LOD ~10–50 ng/g) and throughput (~20 samples/day), though inter-laboratory CVs of 20–40% remain a concern, as reported by Krätschmer et al. [178,179]. Current analytical measurement of SCCPs still requires further development, primarily due to the extreme complexity of SCCP mixtures, low chromatographic resolution between congeners, and difficulty in achieving precise quantification [180,181]. In this regard, our review provides a brief overview of the development of instrumental methods for environmental sample analysis between 2015 and 2025.
Based on the majority of literature reports (19 in total) between 2015 and 2025 (Table 8), sensitive and reliable analytical methods are essential for compliance monitoring of SCCPs in environmental matrices. The most widely employed techniques include one-dimensional gas chromatography (GC), comprehensive two-dimensional GC × GC equipped with electron capture negative ionization mass spectrometry (ECNI-MS), or time-of-flight MS (TOF-MS), and high-resolution GC–high-resolution MS (HRGC-HRMS). In addition, numerous optimization approaches exist to modify instrument sensitivity, including the selection of chromatographic column, MS source temperature, and internal standards [20]. Bogdal et al. presented an innovative method using a chlorine-enhanced atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) approach with a quadrupole TOF-HRMS (APCI-qTOF-HRMS) system for rapid quantification of CPs in environmental samples [180]. Among the diverse analytical methods, GC-ECNI-MS and GC × GC-based methods are commonly applied to analyze the environmental samples (water, sediment, and soil), with the latter offering improved separation for complex matrices. GC-MS-based methods with rigorous cleanup procedures are particularly suitable for food samples due to their high sensitivity and effective lipid removal. HRMS is increasingly preferred for human samples (blood, milk, tissues) because of the need for higher selectivity and lower detection limits [154,182,183,184,185]. Importantly, part of the variability distinguished in reported SCCP concentrations across different studies (as listed in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7) may be attributed to differences in analytical methodologies, including extraction efficiency, cleanup procedures, and instrumental techniques. This methodological variability should be taken into account when interpreting environmental and human exposure data. According to these reported studies, distinguishable differences in SCCP identification and quantification arise not only from the analytical instruments but also from sample preparation procedures. The typical characteristics of several main analytical methods are summarized in Table 9.
In conclusion, for routine monitoring of SCCPs in complex matrices, GC-ECNI-MS remains one of the most widely used and practical approaches due to its robustness, sensitivity, and relatively established protocols. Advanced techniques such as GC × GC-HRMS and Orbitrap-based methods provide superior resolution and congener-level information, but their application is currently limited by instrument complexity, data processing demands, and lack of standardized workflows. Therefore, a tiered analytical strategy may be appropriate where conventional GC-MS-based methods are employed for routine monitoring, while high-resolution techniques are reserved for detailed characterization and research purposes.
Table 8. Analytical procedures of SCCP determination taken into consideration in these reported works.
Table 8. Analytical procedures of SCCP determination taken into consideration in these reported works.
No.Sample Preparation ProcedureSCCP Determination MethodSample TypeYearRef.
1ASEGC-NCI-qTOF-HRMSAir samples from Shergyla Mountain, southeast of the Tibetan Plateau (China)2016[182]
2SE-MCCHRGC-EI/HRMSSediment and biological samples from the Liaohe River Basin (China)2016[183]
3ASEGC × GC-ECNI-HRTOF-MSSediment samples from the middle reaches of the Yellow River, and fish samples from Bohai Bay (China)2016[186]
4VALLMEGC-ECNI-MSSediments from the wastewater treatment plant and Lao-Jie River in northern Taiwan2016[187]
5SE-MCCAPCI-QTOF-MSFish and sediment from Sweden2017[188]
6SBSE-SCCTD-GC-QqQ-MS/MSSolution obtained from Dr. Ehrenstorfer (Germany)2017[189]
7NAUPLC-ESI-QTOF-MSHuman blood samples from fifty adult volunteers ranging in age
from 24 to 45 years (China)
2017[190]
8ASE-MCCGC × GC-LRMSCommercial CP products from three factories and air samples from Beijing (China)2018[191]
9HS-SPMEGC × GC-TOF-MSWater samples from different sites in Beijing (China)2018[192]
10SPEGC-ENCI-MSWater samples from different sites and effluents from the Gaobeidian wastewater treatment plant in Beijing (China)2018[193]
11ASEMALDI-TOF-MSIndoor dust samples from Beijing (China)2018[194]
12ASE-MCCGC × GC-TOF-MSCereal samples and legume samples from 19 Chinese provinces (China)2019[155]
13NALC/ESI-HRMSLard samples from regular market food (Germany)2020[195]
14dSPEGC-ECNI/MSFood samples and lard samples from a previous European Union Reference Laboratory2020[196]
15PLELC-ESI-HRMSFish samples from the pool (France)2020[197]
16NALC-ESI-MSMSMixed plastic wastes from seven industrial waste-processing facilities in Japan (Japan)2020[198]
17NAGC × GC-ECNI-HRTOF-MSCP commercial
product samples from 150 manufacturers in east and northeast China (China)
2021[184]
18PLEGC-APPI-HRMSFish samples (salmon was of aquaculture origin, tuna was caught
in the Mediterranean Sea) (Spain)
2021[199]
19USE-SBSEGC-QqQ-MS-MSPurified water reservoir and the Danube River freshwater
Sediment samples (Slovak Republic)
2021[200]
Acronyms appear in the table: ASE—accelerated solvent extraction; dSPE—dispersive solid-phase extraction; MALD—-matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization; PLE—pressurized liquid extraction; ECNI—electron capture negative ionization; ESI—electron spray ionization; HRGC—high-resolution gas chromatography; VALLME—vortex-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction procedure; LRMS—low-resolution mass spectrometry; MCC—multilayer cleanup column; QTOF—quadrupole time-of-flight; SBSE—stir bar sorptive extraction; SCC—single-layer cleanup column; TD—thermal desorption; SE—Soxhlet extraction; SPE—solid-phase extraction; HS-SPME—solid-phase microextraction in headspace mode; UPLC—ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography; USE—ultrasonic solvent extraction.
Table 9. Comparison and application fields of the main analytical technologies of SCCPs.
Table 9. Comparison and application fields of the main analytical technologies of SCCPs.
TechniquesOutstanding AdvantagesLimitationsApplicable Fields
GC × GC-MSLow quantitative interference from overlapping m/z;
high resolution for structurally similar compounds
Prolonged analysis time; requires optimization of column systems and
temperature programs; complex data processing
Precise separation and quantification of
SCCP/MCCP isomers in environmental samples
GC-NCI-LRMSHigh sensitivity and low cost; ECNI mode generates minimal fragments, suitable for routine analysisResponse factors influenced by chlorination degree, leading to potential
quantitative bias; susceptible to homolog interference
Routine detection of low-complexity samples (e.g., industrial products) with
limited budgets
GC/ECNI-QTOF-MSHigh resolution for
distinguishing SCCPs/MCCPs; strong resistance to matrix
interference
Limited capability for
LCCP analysis; requires complex sample pretreatment
Analysis of SCCPs/MCCPs in environmental samples (e.g., sediments, biological tissues)
GC/ECNI-Orbitrap-MSExcellent compatibility with gas-phase systems; resolution (120,000) suitable for
highly chlorinated CPs
Limited scanning range (m/z 250–810); restricted applicability for long-chain CPsQuantitative analysis of highly chlorinated CPs (e.g., flame retardants)
LC/ESI-QTOF-MSCompatibility with multiple CP types (SCCPs, MCCPs, LCCPs); reduced ion source lossLow sensitivity for SCCPs; ionization efficiency affected by mobile-phase
selection
Simultaneous detection of multiple CP types (e.g., consumer products, food
contact materials)
LC/ESI-Orbitrap-MSUltrahigh resolution (140,000); precise differentiation of chain lengths and chlorination levelsStrict requirements for
Mobile-phase purity; high instrument cost and
operational complexity
Accurate identification of trace CPs in complex matrices (e.g., wastewater,
sludge)

4. Human Body Exposure to SCCPs

This section reviews biomonitoring studies that measured SCCPs in Chinese populations. We organize the analysis by biological matrix (placenta (Section 4.1), breast milk (Section 4.2), blood (Section 4.3), and other tissues/organs (Section 4.4)) because each matrix provides different information regarding exposure timing (prenatal vs. postnatal), internal dose, and potential health relevance.
Dietary exposure, discussed in relation to food intake as mentioned in Section 2.6, is a primary exposure route for SCCPs, and SCCPs in the human body, including placenta, breast milk, blood, serum, and human tissues or organs, are classified as internal exposure [24]. The widespread use and extensive environmental detection of SCCPs have accelerated growing concern about internal exposure in humans. In this review, 20 biomonitoring studies published between 2015 and 2025 from various regions and time periods in China are listed in Table 10. Studies reporting SCCP concentrations in human matrices use diverse units: ng/g lw, ng/g ww, ng/g dw, or ng/mL (serum/plasma). Direct comparisons between studies using different units are problematic because SCCPs are highly lipophilic and lipid content varies dramatically across matrices. Therefore, cross-study comparisons based on different units are not directly made in this section.
Previous studies have shown that the fetus may be exposed to CPs during pregnancy. Research has proven the presence of SCCPs in maternal serum (15.9–584 ng/mL), placenta (10.2–132 ng/g tissue), and cord serum (8.46–223 ng/mL), confirming significant transfer from maternal serum to cord serum [201]. To date, studies on the human body burden of SCCPs remain remarkably insufficient due to difficulties in identifying and quantifying CP mixtures. With continued progress in characterization and analytic strategies, renewed scientific focus has been directed toward precisely elucidating the distribution of SCCPs within the human body, including placenta, breast milk, blood, and organs (fat, kidney, liver, brain, bone, etc.). According to currently published data, the body burden of CPs in China is likely higher relative to that in other countries and regions.
Table 10. Concentrations of SCCPs in human body samples in China.
Table 10. Concentrations of SCCPs in human body samples in China.
SampleSiteConcentrationUnitDetection
Method
Sampling TimeRef.
Human placentaChina<36.8–782.1ng/g dwGC-ECNI-LRMS and GC-QTOF-HRMSNA[202]
Henan province98.5–3771ng/g lwGC-QTOF-HRMS2016[203]
Wuhan10.2–132ng/g wwGC-ECNI-LRMS2015–2016[201]
Guangzhou249–691ng/g lwGC-ECNI-LRMS2016–2017[204]
Mianyang14.3–108ng/g wwGC-ECNI-LRMS2018[205]
Breast milkBeijing<20.0–54.0ng/g lwHRGC-ECNI-HRMS2007–2010[173]
Shijiazhuang210–16,120ng/g lwGPC-GC-ENCI/MS2014–2015[206]
Rural China68.0–1580 (2007);
65.6–2310 (2011)
ng/g lwGC × GC-ECNI-HRTOFMS2007 and 2011[172]
Urban areas in China170–6150 (2007);
131–16,100 (2011)
ng/g lwGC × GC-ECNI-HRTOFMS2007 and 2011[171]
3 cities in the Yangtze River Delta (Shanghai, Jiaxing, and Shaoxing)<LOD-676ng/g lwAPCI-QTOF-HRMS2010–2016[174]
Shanghai771ng/g lwGC × GC-orbitrap-HRMS2016–2017[207]
Urban and rural areas in China131–808 (urban areas);
139–1543 (rural areas)
ng/g lwGC × GC-ECNI-MS2017[208]
Mianyang29.2–271ng/MLGC-ECNI-LRMS2018[205]
Human bloodShenzhen370–35,000ng/g lwUPLC-QTOFMS2012[190]
Beijing2570–57,800 (maternal serum); 3750–40,500 (cord serum)ng/g lwGC × GC-TOFMS2013[209]
Dalian<MDL-203 (Human plasma)ng/g wwHRGC-ECNI-LRMS2015[210]
Wuhan15.9–584 (maternal serum);
8.46–223 (cord serum)
ng/MLGC-ECNI-LRMS2015–2016[201]
Hangzhou206–1448 (serum)ng/g lwGC-NCI-MS2016–2018[211]
Guangzhou407–1570 (Maternal plasma);
499–1830 (Maternal RBCs);
376–1660 (Cord plasma);
520–1780 (Cord RBCs)
ng/g lwGC-ECNI-LRMS2016–2017[204]
Guangzhou1.00–5.45 (human serum)ng/MLHPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS2018[212]
Mianyang51.0–620 (maternal serum);
13.3–242 (cord serum)
ng/MLGC-ECNI-LRMS2018[205]
Jinan1670–42,700 (serum)ng/g lwULPC-qTOF-HRMS2019[213]
Jinan1320–24,100 (serum)ng/g lwAPCI-qTOF-MS2020[214]
Guangzhou4.55–37.7 (serum)ng/ML wwUHPLC-Orbitrap-HRMS2015–2016[215]
Human tissues or organsNorthern China19.2–877 (hair);
57.7–355 (Nail)
ng/g dwGC-QTOF-HRMS2018[216]
LOD—Limit of detection. MDL—Method detection limit. RBCs—Red blood cells.

4.1. SCCPs in Human Placenta

A growing body of research, summarized in Table 10, has verified the widespread occurrence and placental transfer of CPs by analyzing matched maternal serum, placental, and umbilical cord serum samples. These studies are associated with fetal exposure during pregnancy. CPs, including both SCCPs and MCCPs, have been detected in 100% of analyzed placenta and cord serum samples from multiple Chinese cities (Mianyang, Beijing, and Wuhan) [201,205,209], suggesting CP exposure to fetuses during pregnancy. During placental transport, passive diffusion is identified as the primary transfer pathway [209], although the placenta partially retains CPs, thereby modulating fetal exposure [205]. Moreover, comparative analysis means that SCCPs have a greater transplacental transfer potential than MCCPs, as evidenced by higher placenta-to-maternal serum concentration ratios, suggesting that they may pose a more significant direct risk to the fetus [201]. Concentrations of SCCPs in human placenta also exhibit notable geographical variation. For instance, SCCP levels in placentas from the Henan province (98.5–3771 ng/g lw) were observed to be higher than those reported from other regions in China [203]. This disparity, along with the near-universal finding of higher SCCP concentrations in maternal blood than in placental tissue (Table 10), highlights the role of external exposure factors. Maternal exposure is likely influenced by a combination of local environmental pollution, occupational settings, dietary habits, and residential characteristics, although the precise contribution of each factor requires further elucidation. Therefore, current findings establish clear evidence of exposure but highlight the need for more robust epidemiological data. Future studies should prioritize larger, demographically diverse cohorts to accurately determine population-level body burdens, clarify dose–response relationships, and investigate the long-term health implications of prenatal SCCP exposure.

4.2. SCCPs in Breast Milk

Research from multiple Chinese groups has consistently confirmed the presence of SCCPs in breast milk (Table 10), establishing it as a significant exposure pathway for infants [206]. The efficiency of SCCP transfer into milk is influenced by their physicochemical properties, with higher transfer potential observed for congeners having lower chlorination degrees and shorter carbon-chain lengths. As listed in Table 10, reported concentrations in Chinese breast milk tend to be higher than those from Japan, Korea, Norway, and Sweden [173,174]. A distinct urban–rural gradient has been observed, though specific concentration comparisons require careful interpretation of cited values [171,172]. Monitoring data indicate a sharp decrease in SCCP concentrations in both urban and rural areas from 2007 to 2017 [171,172,208]. Infant exposure is dynamic, with a calculated average daily intake via breast milk decreasing from 13.0 μg/kg/day at 1 month to 2.5 μg/kg/day by 6 months of age. Furthermore, SCCP exposure concentrations during lactation have been reported to be over 100 times higher than during gestation [205], revealing this postnatal window as critical for risk assessment. Maternal factors also play a role, as studies report a positive correlation between SCCP concentrations in breast milk and maternal body weight at the end of gestation [206].
Margin of exposure (MOE) values used in this review are derived from toxicological reference points, typically no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) obtained from animal studies. These endpoints include liver toxicity (e.g., hepatocellular changes), thyroid effects, and developmental toxicity. In general, an MOE value greater than 1000 is considered to indicate low concern for human health when extrapolating from animal data, as it incorporates uncertainty factors accounting for interspecies differences and human variability. Although SCCP concentrations in food and human matrices in China are relatively high compared to some other regions, MOE-based assessments suggest that current exposure levels remain substantially below thresholds associated with adverse effects. Such an obvious discrepancy appears because MOE reflects the margin between estimated human exposure levels and experimentally derived toxicological thresholds, rather than absolute exposure concentrations, and therefore is most relevant for assessing immediate or short-term risk. Meanwhile, relatively high environmental levels do not necessarily translate into immediate health risks if exposure remains far below toxicological thresholds. However, these assessments do not fully capture longer-term risks associated with the persistence and bioaccumulation of SCCPs. Due to their environmental stability, SCCPs can accumulate in ecosystems and biota over time, potentially leading to increased exposure levels in the future. Furthermore, vulnerable populations such as infants, pregnant women, and individuals with higher dietary intake may experience different exposure levels and sensitivities, which are not fully represented in generalized risk assessments. Overall, while current MOE-based assessments suggest low immediate risk, these findings should not be interpreted as an absence of concern, inferring further concern about the importance of continuous monitoring and refinement of risk assessment frameworks, particularly in regions with elevated exposure levels.

4.3. SCCPs in Human Blood

SCCPs have been detected in human blood samples worldwide, with reported concentrations covering a wide range (Table 10). Research has primarily focused on maternal and cord serum, with occasional analysis of red blood cells. A consistent finding across studies is that SCCP concentrations in cord serum are approximately one-third lower than in paired maternal serum (Table 10), suggesting possible transplacental transfer from mother to fetus. It should be noted that the SCCP concentrations identified in human blood samples from China appear to be higher than those reported in some other countries [3]; however, direct comparison is complicated by differences in analytical methods and study design. Such an observation is consistent with China’s dominant role in the global production and consumption of SCCPs in recent decades, revealing an association between regional industrial activity and population exposure [4]. The general trend of elevated SCCP exposure in China exhibits regional heterogeneity. For example, a study in Hangzhou (2016–2018) found significantly lower blood levels compared to other Chinese regions. Zhang et al. [211] suggest that this discrepancy may be attributed to local factors, including unique demographic and socioeconomic profiles, specific exposure scenarios, and dietary habits. However, the authors notice that these findings are tempered by several limitations, such as potential sampling issues and a lack of data on local SCCP production profiles, highlighting the need for more refined exposure assessment methodologies.

4.4. SCCPs in Human Tissues or Organs

Globally, research on the distribution of SCCPs in human tissues and organs beyond blood, milk, and placenta remains very limited, with only a handful of studies conducted to date (Table 10). Three pioneering works have examined SCCPs in specific tissues [216,217,218]. An early study by Campbell and McConnell (1980) detected CPs (C10–30) in the fat, liver, kidney, and brain of 24 individuals from the UK (ages 20 h to 92 years), confirming the highest concentrations in fat and liver [217]. Later, Müller and Schmid analyzed CPs in the adipose tissue of a 65-year-old Swiss male using GC-MS analysis [218]. More recently, Han et al. provided the first report of SCCPs and MCCPs in human hair and nails from northern China, suggesting their potential for non-invasive biomonitoring while noting the need to establish correlations with internal tissues and health effects [216].
The reported concentration ranges of SCCPs in major human matrices from China are as follows: placenta, ND-3771 ng/g lw [203]; breast milk, ND-16,100 ng/g lw [206]; blood, 206–57,800 ng/g lw [209]; and other tissues, 19.2–877 ng/g dw [216]. Data on SCCPs in human hair and nails remained scarce, with only one study reporting their levels in these matrices. No distinct regional variation in SCCP profiles within the human body has been identified (Table 10), which is consistent with diet being a primary exposure pathway. Additionally, compared to other countries, the observed high SCCP levels in Chinese blood and breast milk samples may partly reflect a concentration of research activity in China and other high-income Northern Hemisphere countries, limiting global population representativeness. Therefore, expanding studies to diverse geographical and demographic groups is essential. Notably, the frequent use of pooled samples, often necessary due to analytical sensitivity requirements, obscures inter-individual variation and prevents the investigation of correlations between specific SCCP levels and individual health risks. It is important to note that most of the available human studies are observational and cross-sectional in nature. Therefore, causal relationships between SCCP exposure and health outcomes cannot be established. Potential factors, including co-exposure to other environmental contaminants, lifestyle variables, and socioeconomic differences, may influence the observed associations. In addition, limitations such as relatively small sample sizes and the use of pooled samples in some studies further restrict the strength of the conclusions. Consequently, the current evidence should be interpreted with caution. Moreover, future research should prioritize longitudinal cohort studies and mechanistic investigations to better elucidate causal relationships between SCCP exposure and adverse health outcomes.

5. Toxicity, Toxicokinetics, and Adverse Health Effects of SCCPs in Humans

This section critically evaluates the evidence for SCCP toxicity, distinguishing prominent findings from animal and in vitro studies from emerging human association studies. We first summarize organ-specific toxicity (liver, kidney, thyroid) and systemic effects (developmental, neurotoxic, hematological, metabolic) in Section 5.1, then review toxicokinetic data (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion) in Section 5.2, and finally examine human health effects (hepatic diseases, thyroid dysfunction, diabetes, etc.) in Section 5.3. A key theme throughout is the distinction between rodent-specific mechanisms (e.g., male rat α2u-globulin nephropathy) and pathways relevant to human risk assessment.

5.1. Toxicity of SCCPs

To date, research on SCCPs has predominantly focused on their environmental occurrence and distribution, while investigations into their toxicological effects and the underlying molecular mechanisms remain insufficient. Evidence for SCCP toxicity is derived from multiple levels, including in vitro studies, animal experiments, and human epidemiological investigations, each with different strengths and limitations. Early toxicological assessments, primarily based on high-dose in vitro and animal studies, concluded that SCCPs exhibit low acute toxicity, with negative results for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity and only mild eye irritation potential [23,219]. Almost a decade ago, the reported acute, subacute, subchronic, chronic, and carcinogenic studies in rodents exhibited dramatically higher concentrations of SCCPs. In contrast, emerging evidence from contemporary studies indicates that SCCPs at environmentally relevant concentrations can pose significant health risks. While the low acute toxicity is acknowledged, the primary concern has shifted to the effects of chronic, low-level exposure. As summarized in Figure 2, prolonged exposure to SCCPs is associated with adverse outcomes in multiple organ systems, including the liver, kidney, thyroid, and the nervous, endocrine, immune, and hematological systems. Among these, the liver, kidney, and thyroid have been identified as primary target organs. Meanwhile, given that humans are inevitably exposed to SCCPs through diet, inhalation, and dermal contact due to their widespread environmental dispersion [23], a detailed understanding of their organ-specific toxicity is crucial. In this regard, the following sections will therefore systematically summarize and discuss the reported toxic effects of SCCPs on key human organs.

5.1.1. Liver Toxicity

Extensive toxicological research has established the liver as a primary target organ for SCCP toxicity. In vitro studies have shown that SCCPs may activate PPARα-related pathways at relatively high concentrations (≥100 μg/L), suggesting potential mechanisms for hepatotoxicity [156,220,221]. Both subacute and chronic oral exposure in rodents induced dose-dependent increases in liver weight, as well as pathological changes including steatosis, necrosis, inflammation, and vascular alterations.
Studies using human hepatic cell lines (e.g., HepG2) have elucidated potential molecular mechanisms. Exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of SCCPs (as low as 1–10 μg/L) induced cytotoxicity, showing an increasing trend with increasing carbon-chain length and chlorine constituent, and such results elucidated oxidative stress and remarkable metabolic disruption potentially influencing liver toxicity of SCCPs [14,222]. Recent work has shown that SCCPs can inhibit PPARα-regulated fatty acid oxidation and promote aerobic glycolysis in human hepatocytes at concentrations ≥100 μg/L, although the relevance of PPARα-mediated effects in vitro requires cautious extrapolation to the human liver in vivo [223]. However, hPPARα gene expression in in vitro artificial human hepatocytes, as reported by Gong et al. [223], is much lower than that in human liver, as reported by Kersten et al. [224]. In the same year, Liu et al. confirmed that the concentration of serum SCCPs was positively related to male TB and female aspartate aminotransferase concentrations in residents from Jinan in China, indicating that SCCPs cause hepatotoxicity in human bodies [225]. In 2024, Luo et al. elucidated the effects of SCCPs on human normal hepatic cells, observing remarkable metabolomic perturbations at exposure levels of 1, 10, and 100 μg/L [226]. In human studies, the relationship between SCCP exposure and liver enzyme alterations has been reported in a limited number of studies. However, these findings are observational and should be interpreted cautiously. Overall, current evidence is consistent with potential hepatotoxic effects but is not sufficient to establish causality in humans.

5.1.2. Kidney Toxicity

Kidney toxicity of SCCPs has been well studied in animal studies, particularly through mechanisms involving α2u-globulin accumulation in male rats [220,221,227,228]. Notably, a key study identified a species-specific mechanism where a particular SCCP congener binds to α2u-globulin, a protein abundant in male rat kidneys, triggering its accumulation and consequent nephropathy [227]. However, this mechanism is species-specific and not considered relevant to humans due to the lack of α2u-globulinin in humans. In contrast, recent epidemiological findings from a Chinese cohort reported associations between SCCP exposure and glomerular hyperfiltration. For example, a study of male residents in Jinan, China, found a positive association between serum SCCP concentrations and the risk of glomerular hyperfiltration (GH), an early marker of glomerular injury and potential chronic kidney disease [214]. While these findings are suggestive of potential renal effects, they remain preliminary and require replication and mechanistic clarification.

5.1.3. Thyroid Toxicity

While animal studies suggest that SCCPs may affect thyroid hormone regulation and hematological parameters [13,220,228,229,230], available human studies report the relationships that are subject to potential confusion and methodological limitations. For example, in 2018, Qiao et al. elucidated an obvious increase in SCCP levels in human serum, inducing a significant increase in serum TSH concentrations and leading to a distinguishable reduction trend in T3 content [209]. The finding elucidates that SCCP exposure to the thyroid can reflect the hormonal disruption pattern observed in animal models and indicate a potential risk for thyroid dysfunction in humans.

5.1.4. Developmental Toxicity, Neurotoxicity, and Hematological Toxicity

Beyond organ-specific damage, SCCPs have been linked to broader systemic toxicity, adversely affecting development, the nervous system, and hematological function. While evidence from animal models has highlighted these hazards, recent human studies provide direct evidence of related health risks. Animal studies indicate that SCCP exposure can cause developmental toxicity (e.g., growth inhibition in zebrafish), neurotoxicity (e.g., behavioral alterations and glial cell activation), and hematological disturbances [12,231]. These findings establish a foundation for investigating potential human health impacts. Critically, emerging epidemiological research confirms the relevance of these toxicological endpoints for human populations. A study of residents in Jinan, China, found that measured blood SCCP concentrations were inversely associated with key hematological parameters, including WBC and RBC counts, hemoglobin, hematocrit in males, and hemoglobin indices in females. Such a finding indicates a measurable disruption of hematologic homeostasis associated with SCCP exposure in humans, consistent with concerns raised by experimental toxicology [213]. The results of experimental and human data reveal that SCCP exposure poses risks beyond specific organ damage, potentially affecting critical developmental, neurological, and circulatory functions. Further research is necessary to elucidate the dose–response relationships and mechanisms underlying these systemic effects in exposed human populations.

5.2. Toxicokinetics of SCCPs

After oral exposure in the human body, SCCPs are excreted via lung, kidney, and intestine by several typical dynamic procedures, including absorption, distribution, metabolism/biotransformation, and elimination [23]. Animal studies provide insight into the kinetics of these processes. In rats administered a single oral dose, SCCP concentrations in blood peaked approximately 2.8 days post-exposure [232]. Excretion occurs primarily through feces and, to a lesser extent, urine. After 28 days of exposure in rats, about 27.9% and 3.5% of the administered SCCPs were eliminated unmetabolized in feces and urine, respectively, with amounts increasing over time [232]. The physicochemical properties of specific SCCP congeners critically influence their distribution and excretion. The octanol–water partition coefficient (Kow) is a key determinant, while the degree of chlorination and carbon-chain length generate the primary excretion route: low-chlorine congeners are more readily excreted in urine, whereas high-chlorine congeners are preferentially eliminated via feces [233,234]. In 2019, Li et al. indicated that SCCPs might experience carbon-chain shortening in plants and confirmed the presence of decomposition isomers containing a CCl3 group in pumpkin and soybean seeds [235]. Meanwhile, the degree of chlorination increase could result in enhancement of SCCP aggregation in pumpkin and soybean. Recently, there have been a few studies reporting the toxicokinetics of SCCPs in the human body. For example, Gao et al. utilized an in vitro three-dimensional human skin equivalent (3D-HSE) model to assess relevant percutaneous permeation of SCCPs and confirmed that ~10.2% of SCCPs realized penetration of HSE in 36 h [236]. However, there is still no evidence to verify how SCCPs can permeate the skin barrier through appendageal passage or through the intersecting stratum corneum intercellularly or transcellularly.
To date, the tissue and organ distribution of SCCPs has been intensively investigated in rats, mice, hens, quail, and especially humans using 14C-labeled tracers or by analyzing tissue-specific SCCP concentrations [23]. Among the diverse previous studies, the absorbed SCCPs in the human body predominantly exist in fat and organs with strong metabolic activity, such as kidney, liver, brain, hair, and nail, explaining that kidney, liver, brain, and hematopoietic systems are the targets of SCCPs. After the SCCPs are distributed in human tissue and organs via absorption, the metabolism of SCCPs in humans may occur, which can be evidenced by several studies [237,238,239,240]. Since a study reported on C9-CPs in maternal and cord serum from women in Beijing, China [209], and investigated the isomers and levels, more enthusiasm has been shown toward the metabolism of SCCPs in humans. In 2020, Dong et al. explored the pharmacokinetic modeling for SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs in rats and humans through in vivo/vitro exposure of S/M/LCCP to rat and liver microsomes, and the relative metabolic rate of SCCPs was estimated to be 1.31 × 10−6/h in humans [240]. Meanwhile, the relevant metabolic rate of SCCPs was extremely slow and exhibited a rising trend as the carbon-chain length increased in SCCPs. Whereafter, using multiple computational approaches, Wang et al. investigated SCCP (1-chlorodecane) metabolism by cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYPs) via density functional theory (DFT) calculations, assessed bioaccumulation with regression modeling, and predicted carcinogenicity using the Lazar program [237]. Importantly, corresponding consequences in such a theoretical study indicated that metabolites, 10-chloro-decan-5-ol and 1-chlorodecanol, exhibited much easier bioaccumulation, were more carcinogenic, and caused more cardiovascular injury than parent SCCP. Such work is the first study utilizing theoretical analysis to prove the possible metabolism of representative SCCPs in humans. Soon after, as reported by He et al. and Lin et al. in two in vitro studies [238,239], SCCP concentrations could be confirmed to be reduced drastically after incubation with human liver microsome, indicating that SCCPs could be metabolized by CYP450s, and such results are in contrast to those elucidated by Dong et al. [240]. Comparatively, the number of metabolites in He et al. [238] was higher than that detected in Lin et al. [239], which could be explained by differences in experiment conditions and the extraction pathway. However, it is still not clear which specific isoform or isoforms of CYP450s are involved in SCCP metabolism.
Previous work had indicated that diet was dominating the external exposure of SCCPs to the ordinary populace in north China. Generally, the SCCPs in raw food materials and cooking oil undergo transformation and elimination procedures during thermal procedures of cooking. In this regard, the elimination of SCCPs in food and water appears to be particularly important [162]. In 2018, Ding et al. reported the first theoretical study on the adsorption of representative CPs on the CNT surface in an aqueous environment via DFT and molecular dynamics (MD) methods [241]. Meanwhile, in 2019, Zhang et al. reported the photochemical degradation behavior of 1-chlorodecane (CD, a model of SCCPs) in aqueous solution under UV irradiation [242]. In such work, CD experienced absolute photochemical degradation in 120 min, and •OH could be identified as the primary reactive substance owing to the fact that released Cl• from CD in water could lead to the generation of •OH. In the future, deeper studies should be carried out to realize the elimination of SCCPs in diverse environmental matrices.

5.3. Adverse Human Health Effects of SCCPs

In the past, high concentrations of SCCPs, as mentioned in the above sections, could be found in diverse environmental media including wastewater [78], air [132], indoor dust [45], soil [243], and biota [77], owing to the widespread usage and improper disposal of products containing SCCPs. SCCPs could also be identified in human breast milk/blood/placenta [171,190,202,203]. Broadly identified SCCPs in the environment cause possible human health harms via exposure to SCCPs. Accordingly, the assessments of and reduction in SCCP-caused adverse human health effects seem to be important. Risk assessment in previous studies mainly focused on external human exposure to SCCPs through diet, inhalation, and dermal absorption, and discussed the published upper bound of estimated daily intakes (EDIs) near or more than tolerable daily intakes (TDIs) [24]. Moreover, present evidence indicates that non-occupational adult human exposure to SCCPs happens predominantly by diet (~85% relative contribution) and inhalation of indoor air (~15%), while exposure through dust is considered negligible. For young children, however, ingesting dust is considered a more critical exposure approach (~15%), while exposure by diet/inhalation is similar to that of adults. However, the assessments utilizing SCCP concentrations in humans of different ages and genders, including adults (male and female), infants, children, teenagers, and toddlers, are insufficient in identifying the specific health influences of SCCPs.
Current studies elucidate possible adverse health effects of SCCPs in the human body, for example, liver and kidney damage, thyroid hormone, and glucocorticoid imbalances, and so on. Additionally, SCCPs, particularly C12-CPs (particularly Cl6-SCCPs), have been listed as Group 2B carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). In the following sections, we will summarize the relationship between the exposure to SCCPs and the emergence of detailed diseases in human health problems.

5.3.1. Hepatic Diseases

Past studies have indicated that SCCP exposure to human cells could cause oxidative pressure and therefore modify cellular metabolism and cell viability. At the same time, SCCPs play a role as a peroxisome proliferator and obstruct lipid metabolism. Geng et al. evaluated the relevant influence of SCCP dose on metabolic response of human hepatoma HepG2 cells, which serve as metabolically related models for in vitro hepatotoxicity research, and investigated oxidative stress induction, metabolic alteration, and related metabolic enzyme activities [222]. In this work, HepG2 cells were firstly incubated with various levels of C10-SCCPs (1, 10, 100 μg/L; Cl, 60.9%) for 24 and 48 h, respectively, and the results presented a decrease in cell viability, variation in the intracellular redox state, and disorder in metabolite curves, suggesting that human hepatoma may be caused via environmental dose-related SCCP exposure ranging from 1 to 100 μg/L. In 2024, Luo et al. investigated metabolomic interference in human normal hepatic (L02) cells after exposure to SCCPs with doses of 1 μg/L, 10 μg/L, and 100 μg/L via employing metabolomics technology [226].

5.3.2. Thyroid Diseases

According to previous studies, corresponding concentrations of five THs, such as T3, T4, free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine (FT4), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), can influence relevant functioning of nearly all tissues via relevant effects on cell metabolism, and higher THs present the possibility to induce the sympathetic nerve, stimulation, and hypermetabolism, generating palpitations, sweating, and weight loss [244,245]. Meanwhile, toxicology studies elucidated that CPs could disturb TH homeostasis and initially established the associations between SCCPs and TH levels. For example, Qiao et al. researched mass fractions and congener group patterns of SCCPs/MCCPs in paired maternal and cord serum to explore the placental transport mechanism and prenatal exposure risks of SCCPs [209]. In such work, relationships between SCCPs and TH contents in maternal and cord serum were estimated through correlation analysis, and relative consequences exhibited a remarkable positive correlation between ΣSCCP mass fractions and TSH contents in maternal serum, which indicated that exposure to SCCPs could influence rotative TH concentrations in humans and thus have some influence on human health.

5.3.3. Diabetes

The primary characteristic of diabetes is hyperglycemia, originating from insulin resistance or pancreatic beta cell dysfunction [246], and diabetes has been considered a global public health priority because of rapid growth, prevalence, and disease burden. As a representative of diabetes, type 2 diabetes (T2Ds) is not only a crucial risk factor for increasing global mortality worldwide but is also a nonnegligible incentive of other diseases. Recently, Zhang et al. reported that human exposure to SCCPs could boost the relevant risk of T2Ds and destroy lipid metabolism [247]. In this work, 344 participants (172 diabetics and 172 healthy controls individually matched on sex and age) aged 25–80 years with no family history of diabetes were recruited. The overall joint effects of SCCP mixture exposure on type 2 diabetes risk and lipid parameters were estimated after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, alcohol consumption, and smoking status. Corresponding results of such a study showed that C10–11-CPs and ΣSCCPs had a positive correlation with the relevant risk of T2Ds, representing a nonlinear dose–response correlation. Long-term exposure to SCCPs could lead to a higher risk of T2Ds in males and obese people. Exposure to C10-CPs and C11-CPs was positively correlated with lipid parameters, indicating that SCCPs could facilitate relevant evolution of T2Ds through destroying lipid homeostasis. Meanwhile, SCCP exposure to pregnant women can cause gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and GDM can be considered a remarkable type of diabetes that develops during pregnancy, which has been elucidated by Yang et al. [21]. In this study, the authors performed a promising investigation utilizing a nested case–control design to estimate the potential association between SCCP exposure during pregnancy and risk of GDM. To identify relevant associations, serum samples from 102 pregnant women diagnosed with GDM and 204 healthy controls were gathered in Hangzhou, Eastern China. The criteria for selecting the eligible participants were as follows: (1) no history of diabetes or family history of diabetes; (2) no history of liver disease, genetic disease, or cancer; (3) single birth; and (4) available information on epidemiology. It can be found that the median concentration of SCCPs in the GDM family (161 ng/mL) is distinctly larger than that in the non-GDM family (127 ng/mL). Meanwhile, two specific SCCP congeners, C13H23Cl5 and C10H16Cl6, were identified as key variants, showing a significant positive association with GDM risk. The results further indicated that SCCP congeners with lower-chlorine content induced more pronounced glycemic disruption and higher GDM risk. This might be because lower-chlorine SCCPs, with their reduced spatial resistance and molecular weight, more readily cross cell membranes and interact with biomolecules or target proteins to exert biological effects. Recent studies in China have reported a relationship between SCCP exposure and metabolic outcomes, including diabetes and gestational diabetes. However, these findings are based on specific study designs (e.g., cross-sectional or nested case–control), with limited sample sizes. Therefore, potential influence factors, including co-exposure to other pollutants and lifestyle variables, should be carefully considered when interpreting these results.
As discussed in the above-mentioned content, our review concluded a novel perspective about the risk of SCCP exposure faced by the Chinese population and disclosed the potential seriousness of SCCP distribution in China. Moreover, our review and past works identified that professional workers and indigenous inhabitants possessed a high risk of exposure to SCCPs originating from industrial activities [38]. Meanwhile, a recent study evaluates the association between PM2.5-bound SCCPs and asthma, along with relative symptoms, in school-aged children and adolescents, confirming that C11-, C12-SCCPs contributed the most positive weight to the risk of asthma and relative symptoms [248]. However, human evidence remains limited and largely depends on observational studies reporting correlation rather than causal relationships. Further longitudinal and mechanistic studies are required to establish causal links and better understand the health implications of SCCP exposure.

6. Control and Treatment Technologies for SCCPs

Given the high environmental levels summarized in Section 2, this section reviews current and emerging strategies for mitigating SCCP contamination. We cover source control and regulatory alternatives (Section 6.1), including green chemical substitution (Section 6.1.1) and China’s evolving regulatory framework (Section 6.1.2). We then compare physicochemical treatment methods (adsorption, reductive dechlorination, photocatalysis) and bioremediation approaches (microbial degradation, phytoremediation, combined remediation), presenting their relative advantages and limitations in Table 11.

6.1. Source Control and Alternative Strategies

Numerous studies have indicated that exposure to SCCPs could cause serious adverse health effects, including but not limited to liver and kidney damage, endocrine disorders, and reproductive and developmental toxicity. Considering these effects, regulatory action has been taken on national and global scales to evaluate and manage the environmental and health risks posed by SCCPs. Notably, SCCPs and MCCPs have been listed and recommended to be listed as POPs under the Stockholm Convention since 2017 and 2024, respectively [249,250]. Due to their diverse structures and wide varieties, SCCPs exhibit complex behavior and characteristics in the environment. In addition, given their hidden environmental presence, the traditional remediation techniques have been elucidated to be less effective in treating these SCCPs. Accordingly, strengthening control measures from the source and actively promoting the development and application of green alternatives are crucial for effectively preventing and mitigating the environmental and health risks posed by SCCPs. The essential approach to substitution strategy relies on the molecular structure optimization to remarkably decrease the persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity (PBT) characteristics of chemicals while keeping their outstanding inherent properties, thereby achieving a synergistic optimization of the environmental friendliness and economic benefits of chemicals.

6.1.1. Green Chemical Substitution

Following the global ban on SCCPs under the Stockholm Convention in 2017 and 2024, alternatives like MCCPs, LCCPs, thiophosphates, and bio-based materials have been adopted. Although MCCPs serve as effective substitutes, their use releases SCCP impurities into the environment, and they present a higher bioaccumulation potential than SCCPs, despite lower inherent toxicity [251]. Among current alternatives, MCCPs have been listed as a Substance of Very High Concern (SVHC) by the EU and are proposed for inclusion in the Stockholm Convention. Other substitutes also face challenges: thiophosphate esters like triphenyl thiophosphate (TPPT) offer superior lubricant performance but degrade into ecotoxic byproducts [252]; chlorinated bio-based plasticizers such as epoxidized soybean oil (ESO) are more environmentally friendly substitutes for CPs yet generate contaminated wastewater, limiting their use. This dilemma between functionality and environmental safety indicates the urgent need for high-performance, sustainable alternatives to SCCPs.
Strict global regulations and market pressures are prompting the urgent need for environmentally benign chemical alternatives, a dual imperative for industrial modernization and ecological sustainability. This calls for a comprehensive evaluation framework that simultaneously assesses environmental safety, technical performance, and economic viability. To succeed, cross-disciplinary innovation and robust global governance must work in concert to avert the adoption of “regrettable substitutes” that solve one problem while creating new systemic risks.

6.1.2. The Regulatory Framework for Industrial Emissions

In an effort to protect human health and the environment, major economies, including the EU, the U.S., Japan, and China, have implemented regulations governing new pollutants. These rules aim to control their emissions and residues across industrial and consumer sectors. Given the presence of SCCPs in diverse products, regulatory approaches vary globally. The EU (Regulation (EU) 2019/1021) and Switzerland (Chemical Risk Reduction Ordinance) enforce strict prohibitions, banning the manufacture and sale of substances/mixtures containing ≥1% SCCPs (CAS 85535-84-8) and articles containing ≥0.15% SCCPs. China has listed SCCPs in its “List of Key-Controlled New Pollutants (2023 Edition)” for enhanced management, effective 1 March 2023. In contrast, the United States and Japan have not yet established an individual national standard with specific numerical limits for SCCPs in CP products.
In the textile industry, ISO 22818:2021(en) provides a key analytical method (GC-NCI-MS) for determining SCCPs and MCCPs, which are used as flame retardants, plasticizers, and finishing agents. While this standard does not set product limits, specific regulations also do. For instance, the EU regulations on POPs enforce a 0.15% limit on SCCPs in textile components. Similarly, China has proposed amending its mandatory standard GB 21027-2020 to limit SCCPs in contactable plastic parts of student stationery to <1.5 g/kg, with testing to follow GB/T 33345.

6.2. Environmental Treatment Technologies

6.2.1. Physicochemical Methods

In recent years, various methods for SCCP treatment have been reported, primarily including physicochemical and biological approaches. Physicochemical methods play a key role in the remediation of SCCPs via utilizing both physical and chemical procedures to degrade, remove, or immobilize SCCPs. Corresponding removal mechanisms mainly involve adsorption, redox reactions, chemical degradation, and photodegradation. These technologies are considered effective for the removal or mineralization of SCCPs.
(1)
Conventional physicochemical treatment
According to the environmental persistence of SCCPs, adsorption utilizing appropriate adsorbents, such as activated carbon, biochar, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), and functionalized nanomaterials, represents a theoretically promising removal strategy. However, no relative studies on this approach have been reported to date. In addition, membrane separation technology, based on selective permeability, may be a feasible strategy for removing SCCPs. For low-energy removal of particles and colloids, ultrafiltration (0.01–0.1 μm) is effective, though limited for small molecules. Nanofiltration (1–2 nm) enhances organic pollutant removal but requires attention to fouling and cost. Reverse osmosis (<1 nm) achieves the highest effluent quality, making it suitable for heavily polluted water, yet its significant energy needs and brine management complexity constrain large-scale adoption [253].
Under suitable conditions, SCCPs in the environment can realize dechlorination. Lahaniatis et al. [254] found that sodium could induce the reductive dechlorination of CPs in an ammoniated diethyl ether solution, with the identified degradation products being n-alkanes and n-alkenes. In a study on the reductive dechlorination and removal of SCCPs using nano-zero-valent iron (n-Fe0) particles, Zhang et al. [255] observed that the dechlorination rate was regulated by pH, n-Fe0 dosage, temperature, and the concentration of humic acid. The addition of an appropriate amount of humic acid promoted the reductive dechlorination of SCCPs by n-Fe0. However, if the relative concentration of n-Fe0 was higher than 15 mg/L, the dechlorination rate was inhibited. Although physicochemical methods such as n-Fe0 treatment achieve high SCCP removal efficiency, their high cost and operational complexity necessitate further improvement.
(2)
Catalytic degradation
Compared to general physical treatment strategies, catalytic degradation, particularly thermal and photocatalytic procedures, presents desirable cost-effectiveness, higher efficiency, and less secondary pollution, verifying the prospective potential of SCCPs.
Due to the lack of appropriate substituent groups to absorb ultraviolet light >290 nm, SCCPs generally do not generate direct photocatalytic activity under environmental conditions. SCCPs exhibit excellent thermal and chemical stability, with minimal hydrolysis and oxidation occurring in aqueous phases at room temperature. However, in aquatic environments where radicals or catalysts exist, hydrolysis or oxidative photocatalytic reactions can be induced. SCCPs may also undergo indirect photodegradation by being attacked by oxidative radicals in the troposphere. In recent years, advanced oxidation technologies such as photocatalysis (semiconductors like TiO2 [256], ZnO [257], Cu2O [258], silver salt composites [259], bismuth composites [260], non-metal semiconductors [261]) and Fenton-based [262,263] processes have rapidly developed for the removal of POPs from the environment. The semiconductors employed for photocatalysis present a unique band structure that forms photogenerated electrons and holes under light absorption, prompting redox reactions to degrade pollutants. These technologies can either directly mineralize pollutants or enhance their biodegradability through oxidation. Currently, studies on photocatalytic degradation materials for SCCPs remain limited, with reported studies primarily concerning two composite materials: reduced graphene oxide (RGO)/CoFe2O4/Ag and Fe2O3@polydopamine (PDA)-Ag (Figure 3a) [264,265,266]. The remarkable performance of these photocatalytic materials originates from their ability to promote charge carrier separation, thereby generating reactive O species that mineralize SCCPs. The general mechanism involves photogenerated electrons reducing O2 to ·O2 and holes oxidizing H2O to ·OH, which synergistically degrade SCCPs to CO2, H2O, and HCl. This principle is exemplified by RGO/CoFe2O4/Ag, which achieves a 91.9% degradation rate in 12 h (× higher than TiO2 P25) due to Ag’s plasmonic effect and graphene’s conductivity, enhancing e/h+ separation [264]. Likewise, in Fe2O3@PDA-Ag hybrids, Ag nanoparticles accumulate electrons and the PDA shell improves charge transfer, resulting in efficiency improvements of 1.3~2.9 times over control materials. Furthermore, DFT calculations provide molecular-level insight, revealing that mineralization proceeds via ·OH-mediated H abstraction followed by sequential dichlorination (Equations (1) and (2)).
SCCP + ·OH→ SCCP + H2O
·SCCP + ·OH→ HCl + H2O + CO2
Although photocatalysis processes can be applied to degrade SCCPs, their efficiency is often constrained by initial contaminant concentration and reaction conditions. Moreover, photocorrosion represents a typical drawback of photocatalysis, as semiconductor photocatalysts are generally unstable under light irradiation. Therefore, exploring more efficient and environmentally friendly methods for mineralizing SCCPs, as well as seeking other cost-effective degradation technologies, is of critical importance.

6.2.2. Bioremediation Technologies

Unless otherwise specified, the bioremediation technologies discussed below are drawn from studies on SCCPs themselves. Where evidence for SCCPs is unavailable, we draw on studies of structurally or behaviorally similar contaminants (e.g., other POPs such as atrazine and BDE-209); such cases are explicitly noted, and the potential transferability of findings is discussed. Compared to physicochemical methods, bioremediation, as the most economical approach, utilizes the metabolic functions of organisms to reduce the concentration of pollutants in the environment or make them harmless through biosorption or biodegradation and is considered one of the most reliable strategies for reducing organic contaminants from the environment, presenting remarkable advantages in environmental friendliness, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability [267]. Moreover, bioremediation is usually categorized into microbial remediation, phytoremediation, and combined remediation, based on the involved organisms [268].
(1)
Microbial remediation
Some microorganisms can remove hazardous pollutants from the environment through biodegradation, with their intrinsic microbial metabolism serving as the primary biodegradation mechanism [269,270]. Studies have confirmed that halogenated compounds can act as carbon and energy sources for specific aerobic microorganisms. Therefore, obtaining microorganisms with degradation capabilities is a prerequisite for microbial remediation approaches.
Microbial removal is a strategy that involves screening and acclimating specific microorganisms to degrade organic pollutants in the environment, while microbial degradation itself is also one of the essential processes for breaking down organic pollutants via the pathways of dechlorination and oxidation, as described in Figure 3b [266]. It is well known that CPs are compounds resistant to degradation by common microorganisms but can be broken down and removed by specific microbes. The degradation process is highly influenced by temperature, pH, chain length, chlorination degree, stereoisomers, microbial strains, and environmental conditions, and SCCPs with a Cl degree below 60% are particularly susceptible to microbial oxidation [271]. In recent years, microbial degradation has shown promising potential in the treatment of SCCPs. Common microorganisms utilized for the degradation of contaminated regions include bacteria, fungi, microalgae, or microbial consortia [269,270]. Moreover, the addition of nutrients or specific chemical reagents to the bio-culture procedure can accelerate the degradation of SCCPs. Specifically, adding low concentrations (20 mg L−1) of glucose, Tween-80, or acetone to the culture medium has been shown to be effective. Here, Tween-80 acts as a surfactant, improving the solubility and dispersion of SCCPs and thereby increasing their bioavailability to microbes. Furthermore, maintaining a moderate, near-neutral pH creates the most favorable conditions for this microbial degradation [272].
(2)
Plant absorption
Plants can absorb pollutants from soil or water through passive or active uptake by their roots, where processes such as accumulation, degradation, mineralization, and phytovolatilization can occur [273,274], as summarized in Figure 3c. For instance, non-ionic pollutants primarily enter plants via passive uptake, driven by the electrochemical potential gradient between the interior and exterior of the roots. Additionally, plants can absorb atmospheric pollutants through their leaves. Li et al. [235,275,276] selected soybean and pumpkin as model plants and, through indoor hydroponic exposure experiments, discovered a carbon-chain cleavage process of SCCPs mediated by plants, which was an SCCP-specific example. Under the influence of soybean and pumpkin seedlings, highly chlorinated SCCP congeners faced dechlorination to form lower-chlorinated congeners, accompanied by molecular rearrangement of chlorine atoms. In the tissues of both plants, dechlorination and chlorine rearrangement products, such as the daughter chlorodecanes C10H17Cl5, C10H16Cl6, and C10H15Cl7, were detected, along with carbon cleavage products. In comparison, soybean exhibited faster translocation and degradation of the parent SCCPs than pumpkin, as well as a greater extent of degradation, whereas pumpkin accumulated higher levels of the parent SCCPs than soybean. Although real soil, plant systems differ from hydroponic exposure systems, where SCCPs are often adsorbed onto soil and may have lower bioavailability. These findings provide important insights into the phytodegradation of SCCPs in the environment.
(3)
Combined remediation
Combined remediation integrates multiple technologies to address the shortcomings of single-method approaches. Plant–microbe remediation is particularly prominent, capitalizing on a synergistic relationship where microbial metabolites and root exudates jointly enhance contaminant bioavailability and mutual growth. This synergy is exemplified and strengthened in mycorrhizal symbiotic systems. Here, bidirectional nutrient exchange pathways significantly boost plant stress resistance and microbial activity, creating a highly effective bioremediation platform. Direct evidence for combined remediation of SCCPs is currently lacking. However, insights can be drawn from studies on structurally similar persistent organic pollutants. For example, studies on atrazine showed that the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus caledonium promoted its accumulation and metabolism in maize and enhanced degradation by altering soil properties [277,278]. Similarly, for BDE-209 (a brominated flame retardant with physicochemical properties comparable to SCCPs), mycorrhizal inoculation improved degradation in ryegrass [279]. These findings suggest potential transferability to SCCPs, as mycorrhizal fungi can enhance plant uptake of hydrophobic organic contaminants through improved root surface area, altered root exudation, and stimulation of microbial degradation in the rhizosphere. However, direct experimental confirmation using SCCPs as target contaminants is urgently needed before recommending combined remediation as a practical strategy for SCCP-contaminated sites. Further supporting this potential, inoculation with Glomus etunicatum increased aromatic carbon content in alfalfa roots, leading to greater phenanthrene absorption [280]. The potential of combining mycorrhizae with surfactants has also been demonstrated, as surfactants improve contaminant desorption and contact with biological agents [281].
Figure 3. (a) Photocatalysis degradation mechanisms of SCCPs [266]; (b) microbial degradation mechanisms of SCCPs [266]; (c) the main mechanisms and reaction processes of SCCP degradation by plants [274].
Figure 3. (a) Photocatalysis degradation mechanisms of SCCPs [266]; (b) microbial degradation mechanisms of SCCPs [266]; (c) the main mechanisms and reaction processes of SCCP degradation by plants [274].
Toxics 14 00567 g003

6.2.3. Comparison of the Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Remediation Method

The remediation effectiveness of SCCPs varies across different methods. Table 11 compares the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches, as well as the influencing factors and possible mechanisms involved in SCCP removal. As shown in Table 11, pH and temperature are key factors affecting SCCP removal regardless of the strategy applied. Physicochemical methods generally achieve high removal efficiency for SCCPs; however, they often require complex and stringent operating conditions and higher costs. In contrast, the effectiveness of biological methods largely depends on the degradation and adsorption capabilities of the organisms used. Overall, biological treatments typically involve longer processing cycles and are more susceptible to external environmental interferences. Notably, while combined plant–microbe remediation has shown promise for structurally related POPs (e.g., atrazine, BDE-209), direct evidence for SCCP remediation using these approaches remains limited. Transferability is plausible due to shared hydrophobicity and persistence, but SCCP-specific validation studies are a critical research gap (see Section 7).
Table 11. Comparison of the environmental remediation technologies of SCCPs.
Table 11. Comparison of the environmental remediation technologies of SCCPs.
TechnologiesEffect FactorsAdvantagesDisadvantagesReaction Pathways/MechanismsReaction Products
Conventional physicochemical treatment [242,255]Dosage, concentration, pH, temperature, carbon-chain length, and chlorination degree of SCCPs and catalystsA simple process with a high pollutant removal rateHigh treatment costs and unsuitable for large-scale applicationReductive dechlorinationNormal alkanes and normal alkenes, alcohols, or long-chain intermediates
Catalytic degradation [264,265]Light intensity, dosage, concentration, pH, and temperature of SCCPs and catalystsShort time consumption, high efficiency, good reproducibility, easy to handle, and convenient for engineering applicationsHigh cost, difficult to regenerate photocatalysts, complex processing components, and prone to generating organic byproductsPhotocatalytic degradationIntermediates of olefins and carbonyl compounds, H2O, CO2, and HCl
Microbial remediation [272]Carbon-chain length, degree of chlorination, pH, and temperatureLow cost, simple operation, and no secondary pollutionLong degradation cycle of bacteriaBiotransformation and dechlorination degradationLow-chlorine analogs or normal alkanes
Plant absorption [275]Carbon-chain length, degree of chlorination, pH, and temperatureLow cost and environmentally friendlyPlant cultivation is relatively slow and not suitable for large-scale applicationDehalogenation and hydroxylation, dechlorination, and chlorine rearrangement in plant tissuesLow-chlorine analogs, such as C10H17Cl5, C10H16Cl6, and other C10H15Cl7
Plant–microbe combined remediation [277]Carbon-chain length, degree of chlorination, pH, and temperatureEnhance contaminant bioavailability, mutually stimulate growth and activity, and boost plant stress resistance and microbial activitySystem complexity, site-specificity, and time-consumingCombination of microbial remediation and plant absorptionLow-chlorine analogs or normal alkanes

7. Summary and Future Outlooks

This concluding section clarifies the main findings of the review and identifies priority research and policy needs. As we all know, China started producing CPs in the mid-20th century, and CPs can be ubiquitously identified in multifarious environmental matrices, animals, human foods, and human bodies. Even if being viewed as POPs, the relevant production and/or consumption of SCCPs in China still continues. In this regard, the Chinese government should participate in the reduction in and even elimination of SCCPs from diverse environmental matrices. In this review, our primary concern is the recent research progress in the distribution levels, detection, toxicity, and adverse human health effects of SCCPs in China published between 2015 and 2025. Specifically, most studies focused on SCCPs presenting the main contents, including (1) distribution and levels of SCCPs in environment matrices of China, for example, air, water, soil, sediments, biota, and food; (2) development of SCCP determination methods, which help quantify SCCPs correctly; (3) relevant distribution of SCCPs in human bodies, such as human placenta, breast milk, blood, and organs (fat, kidney, liver, brain, bone, etc); (4) toxicity, toxicokinetics, and adverse health effects of SCCPs in humans; (5) current development of control and treatment technologies for SCCPs. However, there are several critical issues particularly related to China that need to be considered in future studies.
(1)
Population-based studies on SCCPs in China may be limited by selection bias and population heterogeneity, such as children, occupational workers, and pregnant women, which could lead to the misinterpretation of health effects. This necessitates large-scale efforts to quantify body burdens and establish correlations with clinical outcomes.
(2)
Because of improper location selectivity during industrial construction, especially the e-waste, textiles, and plastic industries, commercial CPs normally contain indistinguishable mixtures of S/M/LCCPs. Confirming corresponding differences in the toxicity of single CP congeners and building models or calculation methodologies to assess total toxic equivalents would be particularly imperative.
(3)
The complexities of SCCP analysis, particularly due to the isomeric diversity and the difference in characterization tools, standards, and data processing strategies, require a comparable and accurate quantification, which is crucial for combining knowledge of different laboratories dealing with potential environmental risks from SCCPs.
(4)
Further laboratory studies are indispensable, especially studies using human-related concentration levels and long-term exposure. Novel technical strategies containing omics, in vitro models, and in silico simulations could be extremely helpful in disclosing possible adverse health effects of SCCPs. In addition, the joint effect of SCCPs with other pollutants, for example, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), requires more attention.
(5)
Compared to other countries in the world, it can be found that China represents the most severe exposure to SCCPs in all dietary food types, even in non-industrial regions. To support China’s New Action Plan and Stockholm Convention commitments, future studies should prioritize the following: (a) establishing baseline SCCP concentrations in all major environmental and human matrices nationwide; (b) developing standardized analytical protocols to enable inter-laboratory comparability; (c) conducting longitudinal cohort studies to clarify health effects, especially in vulnerable groups; (d) quantifying emission sources and pathways to inform targeted controls; and (e) accelerating the development and validation of green substitutes with lower persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity.
(6)
The priority targets of SCCPs are still unknown, which is a key bottleneck in current toxicology studies. Although state-of-the-art omics technology, including transcriptomics and metabolomics, can identify hundreds to thousands of genes, proteins, or metabolites synchronously, it is still a long way from effectively confirming relevant interactions between chemicals and toxic targets.
(7)
Long-term exposure assessment: lack of cohort-based epidemiological studies.
(8)
Artificial intelligence (AI) presents significant promise in SCCPs. It can enhance detection by rapidly analyzing complex chromatographic data for accurate identification. AI-driven models, such as QSAR and molecular docking, help predict the toxicity and environmental behavior of different SCCP congeners. Machine learning optimizes degradation strategies by screening effective catalysts or microbial strains. Additionally, generative AI aids in designing greener alternatives with lower environmental impacts. These AI applications support smarter monitoring, risk assessment, and sustainable management of SCCPs.

Author Contributions

J.N.: Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Visualization. Z.Q.: Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. J.Y.: Investigation, Data curation. S.L.: Investigation, Data curation. L.N.: Supervision, Writing—review and editing, Funding acquisition. Z.G.: Investigation, Data curation. S.Z.: Investigation, Data curation. S.M.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Funding acquisition, Project administration. W.L.: Supervision, Methodology, and Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42307512), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LQ23D030001), Key Research and Development Project of Zhejiang Province (No. 2024C03232), and Zhejiang Shuren University Basic Scientific Research Special Funds (2024A21007), and Zhejiang Shuren University Analysis and Test Funds for Scientists.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chen, W.; Liu, J.; Hou, X.; Jiang, G. A review on biological occurrence, bioaccumulation, transmission and metabolism of chlorinated paraffins. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 54, 424–443. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, S.; Gong, Y.; Luo, Y.; Cao, R.; Yang, J.; Cheng, L.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chen, J.; Geng, N. Toxic effects and toxicological mechanisms of chlorinated paraffins: A review for insight into species sensitivity and toxicity difference. Environ. Int. 2023, 178, 108020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Huang, J.-W.; Bai, Y.-Y.; Zeeshan, M.; Liu, R.-Q.; Dong, G.-H. Effects of exposure to chlorinated paraffins on human health: A scoping review. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 886, 163953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chen, C.; Chen, A.; Zhan, F.; Wania, F.; Zhang, S.; Li, L.; Liu, J. Global Historical Production, Use, In-Use Stocks, and Emissions of Short-, Medium-, and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 7895–7904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, T.; Gao, S.; Ben, Y.; Zhang, H.; Kang, Q.; Wan, Y. Screening of Chlorinated Paraffins and Unsaturated Analogues in Commercial Mixtures: Confirmation of Their Occurrences in the Atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 1862–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, H.; Chang, H.; Zhang, C.; Wu, F. Occurrence and mass balance of medium-and long-chain chlorinated paraffins in a municipal sewage treatment plant: Comparison to short-chain compounds. Environ. Int. 2019, 133, 105273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wong, F.; Suzuki, G.; Michinaka, C.; Yuan, B.; Takigami, H.; de Wit, C.A. Dioxin-like activities, halogenated flame retardants, organophosphate esters and chlorinated paraffins in dust from Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, Sweden and China. Chemosphere 2017, 168, 1248–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yuan, B.; Rüdel, H.; de Wit, C.A.; Koschorreck, J. Identifying emerging environmental concerns from long-chain chlorinated paraffins towards German ecosystems. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Darnerud, P.O.; Bergman, Å. Critical review on disposition of chlorinated paraffins in animals and humans. Environ. Int. 2022, 163, 107195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Liu, L.; Li, Y.; Coelhan, M.; Chan, H.M.; Ma, W.; Liu, L. Relative developmental toxicity of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 219, 1122–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ren, X.; Zhang, H.; Geng, N.; Xing, L.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, F.; Chen, J. Developmental and metabolic responses of zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos and larvae to short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) exposure. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 622, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yang, X.; Zhang, B.; Gao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yin, D.; Xu, T. The chlorine contents and chain lengths influence the neurobehavioral effects of commercial chlorinated paraffins on zebrafish larvae. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 377, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gong, Y.; Zhang, H.; Geng, N.; Xing, L.; Fan, J.; Luo, Y.; Song, X.; Ren, X.; Wang, F.; Chen, J. Short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) induced thyroid disruption by enhancement of hepatic thyroid hormone influx and degradation in male Sprague Dawley rats. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 625, 657–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ren, X.; Geng, N.; Zhang, H.; Wang, F.; Gong, Y.; Song, X.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, B.; Chen, J. Comparing the disrupting effects of short-, medium-and long-chain chlorinated Paraffins on cell viability and metabolism. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 685, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Peng, Y.; Fang, W.; Yan, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, P.; Yu, J.; Zhang, X. Early Life Stage Bioactivity Assessment of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins at Environmentally Relevant Concentrations by Concentration-Dependent Transcriptomic Analysis of Zebrafish Embryos. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 996–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, B.; Zhao, B.; Xu, C.; Zhang, J. Emission inventory and provincial distribution of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 581, 582–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Diaz, O.M.; Tell, A.; Knobloch, M.; Canonica, E.; Walder, C.; Buser, A.; Stalder, U.; Bigler, L.; Kern, S.; Bleiner, D. Fingerprinting of chlorinated paraffins and their transformation products in plastic consumer products. Chemosphere 2023, 338, 139552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vetter, W.; Sprengel, J.; Krätschmer, K. Chlorinated paraffins-a historical consideration including remarks on their complexity. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 132032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Li, L.; Chen, C.; Li, D.; Breivik, K.; Abbasi, G.; Li, Y.-F. What do we know about the production and release of persistent organic pollutants in the global environment? Environ. Sci. Adv. 2023, 2, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yu, X.; McPhedran, K.N.; Huang, R. Chlorinated paraffins: A review of sample preparation, instrumental analysis, and occurrence and distribution in food samples. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 318, 120875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Yang, L.; Yao, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Yu, S.; Liu, Y.; An, Q.; Aamir, M.; Xu, C.; Hayat, K.; Liu, W. Exposure to Short-and Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins and the Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Nested Case-Control Study in Eastern China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 3665–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kou, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, L.; Hu, L.; Liu, X.; Mei, S.; Xu, G. Accumulative levels, temporal and spatial distribution of common chemical pollutants in the blood of Chinese adults. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 311, 119980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mu, Y.-W.; Cheng, D.; Zhang, C.-L.; Zhao, X.-L.; Zeng, T. The potential health risks of short-chain chlorinated paraffin: A mini-review from a toxicological perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 872, 162187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, X.; Fan, R.; Xu, Y.; Gao, Y.-Z.; Bizimana, A.; Naidoo, A.R.; Han, B.-C.; Meng, X.-Z. Occurrence, distribution and health risk of short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) in China: A critical review. Separations 2022, 9, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zheng, X.; Sun, Q.; Wang, S.; Li, X.; Liu, P.; Yan, Z.; Kong, X.; Fan, J. Advances in studies on toxic effects of short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) and characterization of environmental pollution in China. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2020, 78, 501–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kalinowska, K.; Lenartowicz, P.; Namieśnik, J.; Marć, M. Analytical procedures for short chain chlorinated paraffins determination-How to make them greener? Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 671, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Glüge, J.; Schinkel, L.; Hungerbühler, K.; Cariou, R.; Bogdal, C. Environmental Risks of Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (MCCPs): A Review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 6743–6760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Glüge, J.; Wang, Z.; Bogdal, C.; Scheringer, M.; Hungerbühler, K. Global production, use, and emission volumes of short-chain chlorinated paraffins-A minimum scenario. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 573, 1132–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yumak, A.; Boubaker, K.; Petkova, P.; Yahsi, U. Molecular structure stability of short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs): Evidence from lattice compatibility and Simha-Somcynsky theories. J. Mol. Struct. 2015, 1098, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wei, G.-L.; Liang, X.-L.; Li, D.-Q.; Zhuo, M.-N.; Zhang, S.-Y.; Huang, Q.-X.; Liao, Y.-S.; Xie, Z.-Y.; Guo, T.-L.; Yuan, Z.-J. Occurrence, fate and ecological risk of chlorinated paraffins in Asia: A review. Environ. Int. 2016, 92, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ma, X.; Wang, Y.; Gao, W.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yao, Z.; Jiang, G. Air-Seawater Gas Exchange and Dry Deposition of Chlorinated Paraffins in a Typical Inner Sea (Liaodong Bay), North China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 7729–7735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bai, H.; Zhu, X.; Gao, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, L.; Yaun, H.; Li, X.; Wang, W.; Dong, X. Gas-Particle Partitioning Behavior of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Urban Air of Dalian Autumn. J. Dalian Jiaotong Univ. 2017, 6, 78–84. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gao, W.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Distribution and congener profiles of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in indoor/outdoor glass window surface films and their film-air partitioning in Beijing, China. Chemosphere 2016, 144, 1327–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Huang, H.; Gao, L.; Xia, D.; Qiao, L.; Wang, R.; Su, G.; Liu, W.; Liu, G.; Zheng, M. Characterization of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in outdoor/indoor PM10/PM2.5/PM1.0 in Beijing, China. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 225, 674–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, P.; Zhao, N.; Cui, Y.; Jiang, W.; Wang, L.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Jiang, L.; Ding, L. Short-chain chlorinated paraffin (SCCP) pollution from a CP production plant in China: Dispersion, congener patterns and health risk assessment. Chemosphere 2018, 211, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, T.; Han, S.; Yuan, B.; Zeng, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Summer-winter concentrations and gas-particle partitioning of short chain chlorinated paraffins in the atmosphere of an urban setting. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 171, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhu, X.; Bai, H.; Gao, Y.; Chen, J.; Yuan, H.; Wang, L.; Wang, W.; Dong, X.; Li, X. Concentrations and inhalation risk assessment of short-chain polychlorinated paraffins in the urban air of Dalian, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 21203–21212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Niu, S.; Chen, R.; Zou, Y.; Dong, L.; Hai, R.; Huang, Y. Spatial distribution and profile of atmospheric short-chain chlorinated paraffins in the Yangtze River Delta. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 259, 113958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Cheng, Z.; Li, Q.; Pan, X.; Zhang, R.; Liu, D.; Luo, C.; Liu, X.; Katsoyiannis, A. Short- and Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Air and Soil of Subtropical Terrestrial Environment in the Pearl River Delta, South China: Distribution, Composition, Atmospheric Deposition Fluxes, and Environmental Fate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 2679–2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Li, H.; Li, J.; Li, H.; Yu, H.; Yang, L.; Chen, X.; Cai, Z. Seasonal variations and inhalation risk assessment of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in PM2.5 of Jinan, China. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 245, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Eisenreich, S.J.; Hornbuckle, K.; Jones, K.C. The global legacy of POPs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 9397–9399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wu, J.; Gao, W.; Liang, Y.; Fu, J.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Spatiotemporal distribution and alpine behavior of short chain chlorinated paraffins in air at Shergyla Mountain and Lhasa on the Tibetan Plateau of China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 11136–11144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. He, C.; Brandsma, S.H.; Jiang, H.; O’Brien, J.W.; van Mourik, L.M.; Banks, A.P.; Wang, X.; Thai, P.K.; Mueller, J.F. Chlorinated paraffins in indoor dust from Australia: Levels, congener patterns and preliminary assessment of human exposure. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 682, 318–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, L.-H.; Ma, W.-L.; Liu, L.-Y.; Huo, C.-Y.; Li, W.-L.; Gao, C.-J.; Li, H.-L.; Li, Y.-F.; Chan, H.M. Occurrence, sources and human exposure assessment of SCCPs in indoor dust of northeast China. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 225, 232–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shi, L.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Geng, N.; Xu, J.; Zhan, F.; Ni, Y.; Hou, X.; Chen, J. Concentrations of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in indoor dusts from malls in China: Implications for human exposure. Chemosphere 2017, 172, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gao, W.; Cao, D.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. External Exposure to Short- and Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins for the General Population in Beijing, China, China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chang, T.; Ren, D.; Shen, Z.; Huang, Y.; Sun, J.; Cao, J.; Zhou, J.; Liu, H.; Xu, H.; Zheng, C. Indoor air pollution levels in decorated residences and public places over Xi’an, China. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2017, 17, 2197–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cheng, L.; Li, B.; Cheng, Q.; Baldwin, A.; Shang, Y. Investigations of indoor air quality of large department store buildings in China based on field measurements. Build. Environ. 2017, 118, 128–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, J.; Cheng, B.; Xie, W.; Su, M. Occupational Dust Exposure and Respiratory Protection of Migrant Interior Construction Workers in Two Chinese Cities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Xu, S.; Du, Y.; Li, N.; Dong, Z.; Sun, X.; Zhao, H. Investigation on dust protection status and its influence factors of workers engaged in indoor decoration in Yantai City. Occup. Health Emerg. Rescue 2019, 37, 311–315. [Google Scholar]
  51. Lu, Z.; He, Y.; Yu, B.; Hu, X. Harmful effects of airborne dust diffused from ceramic tiles during home decoration. Powder Technol. 2014, 267, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, Q.; Cheng, L.; Jin, X.; Liu, L.; Shangguan, J.; Chang, S.; Sun, R.; Shang, Y.; Lv, Q.; Li, J. Chlorinated paraffins in multimedia during residential interior finishing: Occurrences, behavior, and health risk. Environ. Int. 2023, 178, 108072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Dimitriou, K.; Grivas, G.; Liakakou, E.; Gerasopoulos, E.; Mihalopoulos, N. Assessing the contribution of regional sources to urban air pollution by applying 3D-PSCF modeling. Atmos. Res. 2021, 248, 105187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, D.; Li, Q.; Cheng, Z.; Li, K.; Li, J.; Zhang, G. Spatiotemporal variations of chlorinated paraffins in PM2.5 from Chinese cities: Implication of the shifting and upgrading of its industries. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 259, 113853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ai, Q.; Zhang, P.; Gao, L.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y.; Huang, D.; Qiao, L.; Weng, J.; Zheng, M. Air-soil exchange of and risks posed by short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins: Case study in a contaminated area in China. Chemosphere 2022, 297, 134230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhou, W.; Shen, M.; Lam, J.C.; Zhu, M.; Liu, L.; Chen, H.; Du, B.; Zeng, L.; Zeng, E.Y. Size-dependent distribution and inhalation exposure characteristics of particle-bound chlorinated paraffins in indoor air in Guangzhou, China. Environ. Int. 2018, 121, 675–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhuo, M.; Ma, S.; Li, G.; Yu, Y.; An, T. Chlorinated paraffins in the indoor and outdoor atmospheric particles from the Pearl River Delta: Characteristics, sources, and human exposure risks. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 650, 1041–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Huang, J.; Zhao, L.; Shi, Y.; Zeng, X.; Sun, W.; Zhao, X.; Liu, R.; Wu, Q.; Dong, G.; Chen, D. Characterization of short-, medium-and long-chain chlorinated paraffins in ambient PM2.5 from the Pearl River Delta, China. Environ. Int. 2023, 175, 107932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Yang, M.; Wang, X.-F.; Huang, J.-W.; Jin, N.-X.; Chu, C.; Huang, G.-F.; Chen, D.-H.; Xie, M.; Zhai, Y.-H.; Lin, Y.-J. Distribution, Sources, and Health Risk of Short-, Medium-and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in School-Area Ambient PM1: A Study from the Pearl River Delta, China. Toxics 2025, 13, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Wang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Gao, Y.; Bai, H.; Wang, P.; Chen, J.; Yuan, H.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Wang, W. Monitoring gas-and particulate-phase short-chain polychlorinated paraffins in the urban air of Dalian by a self-developed passive sampler. J. Environ. Sci. 2019, 80, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Huang, D.; Gao, L.; Qiao, L.; Cui, L.; Xu, C.; Wang, K.; Zheng, M. Concentrations of and risks posed by short-chain and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in soil at a chemical industrial park on the southeast coast of China. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 258, 113704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Pan, X.; Zhen, X.; Tian, C.; Tang, J. Distributions, transports and fates of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in a typical river-estuary system. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 751, 141769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wang, K.; Gao, L.; Zhu, S.; Liu, X.; Chen, Q.; Cui, L.; Qiao, L.; Xu, C.; Huang, D.; Wang, S. Short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in soil from an urban area of northern China: Levels, distribution, and homolog patterns. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 807, 150833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wang, X.; Zhu, J.; Xue, Z.; Jin, X.; Jin, Y.; Fu, Z. The environmental distribution and toxicity of short-chain chlorinated paraffins and underlying mechanisms: Implications for further toxicological investigation. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 695, 133834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Xu, J.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhan, F.; Chen, J. Dispersion of Short- and Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (CPs) from a CP Production Plant to the Surrounding Surface Soils and Coniferous Leaves. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 12759–12766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Yuan, B.; Fu, J.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Short-chain chlorinated paraffins in soil, paddy seeds (Oryza sativa) and snails (Ampullariidae) in an e-waste dismantling area in China: Homologue group pattern, spatial distribution and risk assessment. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 220, 608–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Iino, F.; Takasuga, T.; Senthilkumar, K.; Nakamura, N.; Nakanishi, J. Risk Assessment of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Japan Based on the First Market Basket Study and Species Sensitivity Distributions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 859–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Gandolfi, F.; Malleret, L.; Sergent, M.; Doumenq, P. Parameters optimization using experimental design for headspace solid phase micro-extraction analysis of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in waters under the European water framework directive. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1406, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Houde, M.; Muir, D.C.; Tomy, G.T.; Whittle, D.M.; Teixeira, C.; Moore, S. Bioaccumulation and Trophic Magnification of Short- and Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Food Webs from Lake Ontario and Lake Michigan. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 3893–3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Nicholls, C.; Allchin, C.; Law, R. Levels of short and medium chain length polychlorinated n-alkanes in environmental samples from selected industrial areas in England and Wales. Environ. Pollut. 2001, 114, 415–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Zeng, L.; Wang, T.; Wang, P.; Liu, Q.; Han, S.; Yuan, B.; Zhu, N.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Distribution and Trophic Transfer of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in an Aquatic Ecosystem Receiving Effluents from a Sewage Treatment Plant. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 5529–5535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Sun, R.; Luo, X.; Tang, B.; Li, Z.; Huang, L.; Wang, T.; Mai, B. Short-chain chlorinated paraffins in marine organisms from the Pearl River Estuary in South China: Residue levels and interspecies differences. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 553, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ma, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Z.; Yao, Z.; Chen, J.; Chen, J. Bioaccumulation and Trophic Transfer of Short Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in a Marine Food Web from Liaodong Bay, North China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 5964–5971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hu, H.; Jin, H.; Li, T.; Guo, Y.; Wu, P.; Xu, K.; Zhu, W.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, M. Spatial distribution, partitioning, and ecological risk of short chain chlorinated paraffins in seawater and sediment from East China Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 811, 151932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wang, X.T.; Jia, H.H.; Hu, B.P.; Cheng, H.X.; Zhou, Y.; Fu, R. Occurrence, sources, partitioning and ecological risk of short- and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in river water and sediments in Shanghai. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 653, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zhao, N.; Cui, Y.; Wang, P.; Li, S.; Jiang, W.; Luo, N.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Ding, L. Short-chain chlorinated paraffins in soil, sediment, and seawater in the intertidal zone of Shandong Peninsula, China: Distribution and composition. Chemosphere 2019, 220, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Sun, R.; Luo, X.; Tang, B.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y.; Mai, B. Bioaccumulation of short chain chlorinated paraffins in a typical freshwater food web contaminated by e-waste in south china: Bioaccumulation factors, tissue distribution, and trophic transfer. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 222, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Zeng, L.; Li, H.; Wang, T.; Gao, Y.; Xiao, K.; Du, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Behavior, fate, and mass loading of short chain chlorinated paraffins in an advanced municipal sewage treatment plant. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 732–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Wan, W. Distribution Characteristics of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffin in Baiyangdian Lake and the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River. Master’s Thesis, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China, 2017. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  80. Yu, G. Study on Method and Application for Analysis of Short Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Marine Environment. Master’s Thesis, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China, 2012. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  81. Halse, A.K.; Schlabach, M.; Schuster, J.K.; Jones, K.C.; Steinnes, E.; Breivik, K. Endosulfan, pentachlorobenzene and short-chain chlorinated paraffins in background soils from Western Europe. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 196, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Bogdal, C.; Niggeler, N.; Glüge, J.; Diefenbacher, P.S.; Wächter, D.; Hungerbühler, K. Temporal trends of chlorinated paraffins and polychlorinated biphenyls in Swiss soils. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 220, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Li, H.; Fu, J.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y. Occurrence, bioaccumulation and long-range transport of short-chain chlorinated paraffins on the Fildes Peninsula at King George Island, Antarctica. Environ. Int. 2016, 94, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wang, K.; Gao, L.; Zhu, S.; Cui, L.; Qiao, L.; Xu, C.; Huang, D.; Zheng, M. Spatial distributions and homolog profiles of chlorinated nonane paraffins, and short and medium chain chlorinated paraffins in soils from Yunnan, China. Chemosphere 2020, 247, 125855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Li, H.; Bu, D.; Fu, J.; Gao, Y.; Cong, Z.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, A.; Jiang, G. Trophic dilution of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in a plant-plateau pika-eagle food chain from the Tibetan Plateau. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 9472–9480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wu, J.; Gao, W.; Liang, Y.; Fu, J.; Jiang, G. Short- and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in multi-environmental matrices in the Tibetan Plateau environment of China: A regional scale study. Environ. Int. 2020, 140, 105767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Wania, F.; Westgate, J. On the mechanism of mountain cold-trapping of organic chemicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 9092–9098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Aamir, M.; Yin, S.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, C.; Liu, K.; Liu, W. Congener-specific C10-C13 and C14-C17 chlorinated paraffins in Chinese agricultural soils: Spatio-vertical distribution, homologue pattern and environmental behavior. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 245, 789–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Wang, X.-T.; Zhang, Y.; Miao, Y.; Ma, L.-L.; Li, Y.-C.; Chang, Y.-Y.; Wu, M.-H. Short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) in surface soil from a background area in China: Occurrence, distribution, and congener profiles. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20, 4742–4749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, X.-T.; Wang, X.-K.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, L.; Sun, Y.-F.; Li, M.; Wu, M.-H. Short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in urban soils of Shanghai: Spatial distribution, homologue group patterns and ecological risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 490, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Wang, X.-T.; Xu, S.-Y.; Wang, X.-K.; Hu, B.-P.; Jia, H.-H. Occurrence, homologue patterns and source apportionment of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in suburban soils of Shanghai, China. Chemosphere 2017, 180, 302–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Xu, C.; Zhou, Q.; Shen, C.; Li, F.; Liu, S.; Yin, S.; Aamir, M. Short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in agricultural and industrial soils from Shanghai, China: Surface and vertical distribution, penetration behavior, and health risk assessment. Environ. Geochem. Health 2023, 45, 9087–9101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Xia, Q. The Research About SCCPs Level in the Zhejiang Province Soil and Sediments. Master’s Thesis, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China, 2012. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  94. Xu, C.; Zhang, Q.; Gao, L.; Zheng, M.; Qiao, L.; Cui, L.; Wang, R.; Cheng, J. Spatial distributions and transport implications of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in soils and sediments from an e-waste dismantling area in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 649, 821–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Chen, W.; Hou, X.; Liu, Y.; Hu, X.; Jiang, G. Medium- and Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Mature Maize Plants and Corresponding Agricultural Soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 4669–4678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Huang, Y.; Chen, L.; Feng, Y.; Ye, Z.; He, Q.; Feng, Q.; Qing, X.; Liu, M.; Gao, B. Short-chain chlorinated paraffins in the soils of two different Chinese cities: Occurrence, homologue patterns and vertical migration. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 557, 644–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Han, S.; Huang, Y.; Chen, L.; Ye, Z.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, S. The short-chain chlorinated paraffins content and distribution in soil of Guangzhou. Sichuan Environ. 2012, 31, 56–60. [Google Scholar]
  98. Wu, Y.; Wu, J.; Tan, H.; Song, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zhong, X.; Zhou, J.; Wu, W.; Cai, X.; Zhang, W. Distributions of chlorinated paraffins and the effects on soil microbial community structure in a production plant brownfield site. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 262, 114328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Gao, L.; Gopalakrishnan, G.; Liu, P.; Ou, X.; Zhang, Y. Pollution distribution characteristics, source tracing and risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in soils of electronic industrial parks and associated environments. Environ. Geochem. Health 2025, 47, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Feng, Y.; Chen, L.; Huang, Y.; Ye, Z.; Jiang, G.; Wang, X. Preliminary study on short-chain chlorinated paraffins in different types of soils of Chengdu. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 37, 33–47. [Google Scholar]
  101. Zeng, L.; Wang, T.; Han, W.; Yuan, B.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Spatial and vertical distribution of short chain chlorinated paraffins in soils from wastewater irrigated farmlands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 2100–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Weng, J.; Zhang, P.; Gao, L.; Zhu, S.; Liu, Y.; Qiao, L.; Zhao, B.; Liu, Y.; Xu, M.; Zheng, M. Concentrations, homolog profiles, and risk assessment of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in soil around factories in a non-ferrous metal recycling park. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 293, 118456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Du, X.; Li, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Li, G. Short-chain chlorinated paraffins in soils indicate landfills as local sources in the Tibetan Plateau. Chemosphere 2020, 263, 128341. [Google Scholar]
  104. Drouillard, K.G.; Hiebert, T.; Tran, P.; Tomy, G.T.; Muir, D.C.; Friesen, K.J. Estimating the aqueous solubilities of individual chlorinated n-alkanes (C10-C12) from measurements of chlorinated alkane mixtures. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. Int. J. 1998, 17, 1261–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zeng, L.; Lam, J.C.; Horii, Y.; Li, X.; Chen, W.; Qiu, J.-W.; Leung, K.M.; Yamazaki, E.; Yamashita, N.; Lam, P.K. Spatial and temporal trends of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in sediments off the urbanized coastal zones in China and Japan: A comparison study. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 224, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Marvin, C.; Painter, S.; Tomy, G.; Stern, G.; Braekevelt, E.; Muir, D. Spatial and temporal trends in short-chain chlorinated paraffins in Lake Ontario sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 4561–4568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Tomy, G.; Stern, G.; Lockhart, W.; Muir, D. Occurrence of C10-C13 polychlorinated n-alkanes in Canadian midlatitude and arctic lake sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 2858–2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Iozza, S.; Müller, C.E.; Schmid, P.; Bogdal, C.; Oehme, M. Historical profiles of chlorinated paraffins and polychlorinated biphenyls in a dated sediment core from Lake Thun (Switzerland). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 1045–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Hussy, I.; Webster, L.; Russell, M.; Moffat, C. Determination of chlorinated paraffins in sediments from the Firth of Clyde by gas chromatography with electron capture negative ionisation mass spectrometry and carbon skeleton analysis by gas chromatography with flame ionisation detection. Chemosphere 2012, 88, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Přibylová, P.; Klánová, J.; Holoubek, I. Screening of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in selected riverine sediments and sludge from the Czech Republic. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 144, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Hüttig, J.; Oehme, M. Presence of chlorinated paraffins in sediments from the North and Baltic Seas. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2005, 49, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Castells, P.; Parera, J.; Santos, F.; Galceran, M. Occurrence of polychlorinated naphthalenes, polychlorinated biphenyls and short-chain chlorinated paraffins in marine sediments from Barcelona (Spain). Chemosphere 2008, 70, 1552–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Castells, P.; Santos, F.; Galceran, M. Evaluation of three ionisation modes for the analysis of chlorinated paraffins by gas chromatography/ion-trap mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 18, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Ma, X.; Chen, C.; Zhang, H.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yao, Z.; Chen, J.; Chen, J. Congener-specific distribution and bioaccumulation of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in sediments and bivalves of the Bohai Sea, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2014, 79, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Gao, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhang, H.; Zou, L.; Tian, Y.; Chen, J. Analysis of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in sediment samples from the mouth of the Daliao River by HRGC/ECNI-LRMS. Environ. Sci. 2010, 31, 1904–1908. [Google Scholar]
  116. Huang, Y.; Chen, L.; Jiang, G.; He, Q.; Ren, L.; Gao, B.; Cai, L. Bioaccumulation and biomagnification of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in marine organisms from the Pearl River Estuary, South China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 671, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Zeng, L.; Zhao, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, T.; Liu, Q.; Xiao, K.; Du, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Distribution of short chain chlorinated paraffins in marine sediments of the East China Sea: Influencing factors, transport and implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 9898–9906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Zhao, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, G.; Cao, Y.; Zeng, L.; Lan, J.; Wang, T.; Jiang, G. Source and migration of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in the coastal East China Sea using multiproxies of marine organic geochemistry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 5013–5022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Zhang, C.; Chang, H.; Wang, H.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, X.; He, Y.; Sun, F.; Wu, F. Spatial and temporal distributions of short-, medium-, and long-chain chlorinated paraffins in sediment cores from nine lakes in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 9462–9471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Guan, K.-L.; Luo, X.-J.; Lu, Q.-H.; Huang, C.-C.; Qi, X.-M.; Zeng, Y.-H.; Mai, B.-X.; Wang, S.-Q. Occurrence, spatial distribution, and risk assessment of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in sediment from black-odorous rivers across China. Chemosphere 2023, 313, 137454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Pan, X.; Tang, J.; Tian, C.; Li, J.; Zhang, G. Short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in sediments from the Laizhou Bay area, North China: Implications for transportation from rivers to marine environment. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 243, 1460–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Chen, M.; Lu, F.; Chen, J.; Luo, X.; Mai, B. Temporal distributions of chlorinated paraffins in sediments core from the Pearl River Delta. Environ. Chem. 2014, 33, e836. [Google Scholar]
  123. Lu, F.; Chen, M.; Chen, Y.; Liu, F.; Luo, X.; Mai, B. Distribution of chlorinated paraffins and polychlorinated biphenyls in e-waste, residues and sediment from e-waste areas of Qingyuan. Environ. Chem. 2015, 34, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar]
  124. Li, Q.; Cheng, X.; Cui, Y.; Sun, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, G. Short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in the Henan section of the Yellow River: Occurrences, fates, and fluxes. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 640, 1312–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Qiao, L.; Xia, D.; Gao, L.; Huang, H.; Zheng, M. Occurrences, sources and risk assessment of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in sediments from the middle reaches of the Yellow River, China. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 219, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Qiao, L.; Gao, L.; Xia, D.; Huang, H.; Zheng, M. Short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in sediments from the middle reaches of the Yangtze River: Spatial distributions, source apportionment and risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 575, 1177–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Cao, X.; Gao, L.; Jiang, X.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ai, Q.; Weng, J.; Zheng, M. Short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in sediment from the Haihe River Basin: Sources, distributions, and ecological risk assessment. Chemosphere 2024, 349, 140856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Chen, C.; Ma, X.; Guo, W.; Zhao, Y.; Lü, J.; Wang, Z.; Yao, Z. Congener specific distribution and bioaccumulation of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in Liao estuary. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2014, 59, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Li, H.; Lan, J.; Zeng, L.; Cao, Y.; Zhao, Z. Sedimentary records of short chain chlorinated paraffins in the Zhejiang-Fujian mud area of the East China Sea. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2014, 23, 105–112. [Google Scholar]
  130. Huang, H.; Gao, L.; Xia, D.; Qiao, L. Bioaccumulation and biomagnification of short and medium chain polychlorinated paraffins in different species of fish from Liaodong Bay, North China. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Zeng, L.; Lam, J.C.; Chen, H.; Du, B.; Leung, K.M.; Lam, P.K. Tracking dietary sources of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in marine mammals through a subtropical marine food web. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 9543–9552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Wang, T.; Yu, J.; Han, S.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Levels of short chain chlorinated paraffins in pine needles and bark and their vegetation-air partitioning in urban areas. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 196, 309–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Wang, X.; Zhou, J.; Lei, B.; Zhou, J.; Xu, S.; Hu, B.; Wang, D.; Zhang, D.; Wu, M. Atmospheric occurrence, homologue patterns and source apportionment of short- and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in Shanghai, China: Biomonitoring with Masson pine (Pinus massoniana L.) needles. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 560–561, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Re, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Tang, B.; Luo, X.; Huang, C.; Mai, B. Bioaccumulative characteristics of halogenated flame retardants in aquatic and terrestrial biotas: A case study of catfish and pigeons. Asian J. Ecotoxicol. 2018, 1, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhou, Y.; Yin, G.; Du, X.; Xu, M.; Qiu, Y.; Ahlqvist, P.; Chen, Q.; Zhao, J. Short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) in a freshwater food web from Dianshan Lake: Occurrence level, congener pattern and trophic transfer. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Du, X.; Yuan, B.; Zhou, Y.; de Wit, C.A.; Yin, G. Chlorinated Paraffins in Two Snake Species from the Yangtze River Delta: Tissue Distribution and Biomagnification. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 2753–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Du, X.; Yuan, B.; Zhou, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Wu, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Yin, G. Tissue-specific accumulation, sexual difference, and maternal transfer of chlorinated paraffins in black-spotted frogs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 4739–4746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Du, X.; Yuan, B.; Zhou, Y.; Benskin, J.P.; Qiu, Y.; Yin, G.; Zhao, J. Short-, medium-, and long-chain chlorinated paraffins in wildlife from paddy fields in the Yangtze River Delta. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 1072–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Dong, S.; Zhang, S.; Zou, Y.; Fan, M.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, J.; Wang, R.; Li, T.; Li, X.; Wang, P. Concentrations and sources of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in farmed Chinese mitten crabs in China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 411, 125076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Luo, X.-J.; Sun, Y.-X.; Wu, J.-P.; Chen, S.-J.; Mai, B.-X. Short-chain chlorinated paraffins in terrestrial bird species inhabiting an e-waste recycling site in South China. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 198, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Guan, K.-L.; Liu, Y.; Luo, X.-J.; Zeng, Y.-H.; Mai, B.-X. Short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in aquatic organisms from an e-waste site: Biomagnification and maternal transfer. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 708, 134840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Yuan, B.; Wang, T.; Zhu, N.; Zhang, K.; Zeng, L.; Fu, J.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Short chain chlorinated paraffins in mollusks from coastal waters in the Chinese Bohai Sea. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 6489–6496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Wang, Y.; Ma, X.; Gao, W.; Li, C.; Meng, L.; Zhong, H.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Temporal trends of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in mollusks from the Chinese Bohai Sea during 2011-2018. ACS EST Water 2020, 1, 765–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Hu, H.; Qu, J.; Zhao, M.; Wu, P.; Zhu, W.; Zhou, Y.; Jin, H. Bioaccumulation and trophic magnification of short chain chlorinated paraffins in marine organisms from East China Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 173, 113049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Jiang, W.; Chen, H.; Huang, T.; Lian, L.; Li, J.; Jia, C.; Gao, H.; Mao, X.; Ma, J. Tagged sources of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in China’s marine environment and fish. Chemosphere 2019, 229, 358–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Zeng, L.; Lam, J.C.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G.; Lam, P.K. Temporal trends and pattern changes of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in marine mammals from the South China Sea over the past decade. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 11348–11355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Wang, W.; Wang, J.; Nie, H.; Fan, R.; Huang, Y. Occurrence, trophic magnification and potential risk of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in coral reef fish from the Nansha Islands, South China Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 739, 140084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Lyu, L.; Chen, Y.; Fang, K.; Huang, Q.; Wang, L.; Mai, Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, S. Bioaccumulation and Trophic Transfer of Short-, Medium-, and Long-Chain-Chlorinated Paraffins in Benthic Biotas of the Haima Cold Seep, South China Sea. ACS EST Water 2024, 4, 2101–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Du, B.; Ge, J.; Yang, R.; Han, X.; Chen, H.; Li, J.; Zeng, L. Altitude-dependent accumulation of short chain chlorinated paraffins in fish from alpine lakes and Lhasa river on the Tibetan Plateau. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 250, 594–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Lee, S.; Choo, G.; Ekpe, O.D.; Kim, J.; Oh, J.-E. Short-chain chlorinated paraffins in various foods from Republic of Korea: Levels, congener patterns, and human dietary exposure. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Li, H.; Gao, S.; Yang, M.; Zhang, F.; Cao, L.; Xie, H.; Chen, X.; Cai, Z. Dietary exposure and risk assessment of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in supermarket fresh products in Jinan, China. Chemosphere 2020, 244, 125393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Gao, L.; Cui, L.; Li, J.; Lyu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, M.; Wu, Y. Exposure to Chlorinated Paraffins in the Sixth Total Diet Study-China, 2016–2019. China CDC Wkly. 2022, 4, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Wang, S.; Gao, L.; Zheng, M.; Qiao, L.; Xu, C.; Wang, K.; Huang, D. Occurrences, congener group profiles, and risk assessment of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in cup instant noodles from China. Chemosphere 2021, 279, 130503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Cao, Y.; Harada, K.H.; Liu, W.; Yan, J.; Zhao, C.; Niisoe, T.; Adachi, A.; Fujii, Y.; Nouda, C.; Takasuga, T. Short-chain chlorinated paraffins in cooking oil and related products from China. Chemosphere 2015, 138, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Wang, R.; Gao, L.; Zheng, M.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y.; Wang, G.; Xiong, L.; Ding, D.; Lu, D. Characterization of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in cereals and legumes from 19 Chinese provinces. Chemosphere 2019, 226, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Wang, X.; Zhu, J.; Kong, B.; He, B.; Wei, L.; Jin, Y.; Shan, Y.; Wang, W.; Pan, C.; Fu, Z. C9-13 chlorinated paraffins cause immunomodulatory effects in adult C57BL/6 mice. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 675, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Cui, L.; Gao, L.; Zheng, M.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y.; Qiao, L.; Xu, C.; Wang, K.; Huang, D. Short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in foods from the sixth Chinese total diet study: Occurrences and estimates of dietary intakes in South China. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 9043–9051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Dong, S.; Zhang, S.; Wu, X.; Cao, J.; Yan, M.; Zou, Y.; Yan, H.; Tang, J.; Suo, D.; Wang, P. A preliminary study on short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in duck farms: Concentrations, distribution, and dietary exposure risks. Environ. Res. 2024, 246, 118109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Ding, L.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, N.; Yan, W.; Li, Y. Overlooked long-chain chlorinated paraffin (LCCP) contamination in foodstuff from China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 801, 149775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Zhou, W.; Huang, K.; Bu, D.; Zhang, Q.; Fu, J.; Hu, B.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, W.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, A. Remarkable Contamination of Short-and Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Free-Range Chicken Eggs from Rural Tibetan Plateau. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 5093–5102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Huang, H.; Gao, L.; Zheng, M.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y.; Wang, R.; Xia, D.; Qiao, L.; Cui, L. Dietary exposure to short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in meat and meat products from 20 provinces of China. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 233, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Gao, W.; Cao, D.; Lv, K.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Elimination of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in diet after Chinese traditional cooking-a cooking case study. Environ. Int. 2019, 122, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Wu, X.; Zhang, S.; Cao, J.; Tian, J.; Zhou, W.; Gao, H.; Dong, S. Chlorinated paraffins in takeout food and its packaging in Beijing, China and dietary exposure risk. Environ. Res. 2024, 252, 118768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Wang, R.; Gao, L.; Zheng, M.; Tian, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y.; Huang, H.; Qiao, L.; Liu, W. Short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in aquatic foods from 18 Chinese provinces: Occurrence, spatial distributions, and risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 1199–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Gao, W.; Bai, L.; Ke, R.; Cui, Y.; Yang, C.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Distributions and congener group profiles of short-chain and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in cooking oils in Chinese markets. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 7601–7608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Jiang, L.; Ma, X.; Ciren, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Characterization of short-, medium-, and long-chain chlorinated paraffins in Tibetan butter and implications for local human exposure. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 465, 133117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Wang, Y.; Wu, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Dong, S.; Zhou, W. Short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in green tea from 11 Chinese provinces and their migration from packaging. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 427, 128192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Zhou, X.; Wu, H.; Huang, X.; Hang, F.; Luo, H. Rapid analysis of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in wine by dispersive liquid-liquid micro-extraction coupled with high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2020, 319, 126583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Dong, S.; Qi, S.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wu, X.; Cao, J.; Zou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xia, S.; Wang, P. Bee colonies map the short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffin contamination from the apiary environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 926, 171846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Dong, S.; Zhang, S.; Li, X.; Wei, S.; Li, T.; Zou, Y.; Zhang, W.; Cheng, J.; Wang, R.; Wang, P. Occurrence of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in raw dairy cow milk from five Chinese provinces. Environ. Int. 2020, 136, 105466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Xia, D.; Gao, L.; Zheng, M.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y.; Tian, Q.; Huang, H.; Qiao, L. Human Exposure to Short- and Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins via Mothers’ Milk in Chinese Urban Population. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 608–615. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  172. Xia, D.; Gao, L.-R.; Zheng, M.-H.; Li, J.-G.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y.-N.; Qiao, L.; Tian, Q.-C.; Huang, H.-T.; Liu, W.-B. Health risks posed to infants in rural China by exposure to short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in breast milk. Environ. Int. 2017, 103, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Cao, Y.; Harada, K.H.; Hitomi, T.; Niisoe, T.; Wang, P.; Shi, Y.; Yang, H.-R.; Takasuga, T.; Koizumi, A. Lactational exposure to short-chain chlorinated paraffins in China, Korea, and Japan. Chemosphere 2017, 173, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Zhou, Y.; Yuan, B.; Nyberg, E.; Yin, G.; Bignert, A.; Glynn, A.; Odland, J.Y.; Qiu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Y. Chlorinated Paraffins in Human Milk from Urban Sites in China, Sweden, and Norway. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 4356–4366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Luo, Y.; Li, J.; Gao, W.; Gao, L.; Ke, R.; Yang, C.; Wang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Exposure to short-, medium-, and long-chain chlorinated paraffins for infant via cow infant formula, goat infant formula and baby food. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 165, 113178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Van Mourik, L.; Van Der Veen, I.; Crum, S.; De Boer, J. Developments and interlaboratory study of the analysis of short-chain chlorinated paraffins. Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 102, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Yuan, B.; Muir, D.; MacLeod, M. Methods for trace analysis of short-, medium-, and long-chain chlorinated paraffins: Critical review and recommendations. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1074, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Krätschmer, K.; Schächtele, A. Interlaboratory studies on chlorinated paraffins: Evaluation of different methods for food matrices. Chemosphere 2019, 234, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Krätschmer, K.; Schächtele, A.; Malisch, R.; Vetter, W. Chlorinated paraffins (CPs) in salmon sold in southern Germany: Concentrations, homologue patterns and relation to other persistent organic pollutants. Chemosphere 2019, 227, 630–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Bogdal, C.; Alsberg, T.; Diefenbacher, P.S.; MacLeod, M.; Berger, U. Fast quantification of chlorinated paraffins in environmental samples by direct injection high-resolution mass spectrometry with pattern deconvolution. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 2852–2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Krätschmer, K.; Cojocariu, C.; Schächtele, A.; Malisch, R.; Vetter, W. Chlorinated paraffin analysis by gas chromatography Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry: Method performance, investigation of possible interferences and analysis of fish samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1539, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Gao, W.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Quantification of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in environmental samples by gas chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1452, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Gao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zou, L.; Wu, P.; Yu, Z.; Lu, X.; Chen, J. Quantification of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins by Deuterodechlorination Combined with Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 3746–3753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Xia, D.; Vaye, O.; Lu, R.; Sun, Y. Resolving mass fractions and congener group patterns of C8-C17 chlorinated paraffins in commercial products: Associations with source characterization. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 769, 144701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Huang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, H. Structure Characterization and Products Control of Technical Chlorinated Paraffins by Direct Injection Mass Spectrometry With Data Deconvolution and 1H NMR With Chemometrics Tools. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2025, 2025, 1180345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Xia, D.; Gao, L.; Zheng, M.; Tian, Q.; Huang, H.; Qiao, L. A Novel Method for Profiling and Quantifying Short- and Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Environmental Samples Using Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Negative Ionization High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 7601–7609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Chang, C.Y.; Chung, W.H.; Ding, W.H. Vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction for the rapid screening of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in water. J. Sep. Sci. 2016, 39, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  188. Yuan, B.; Bogdal, C.; Berger, U.; MacLeod, M.; Gebbink, W.A.; Alsberg, T.; de Wit, C. Quantifying Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffin Congener Groups. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 10633–10641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Tölgyessy, P.; Nagyová, S.; Sládkovičová, M. Determination of short chain chlorinated paraffins in water by stir bar sorptive extraction-thermal desorption-gas chromatography-triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1494, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Li, T.; Wan, Y.; Gao, S.; Wang, B.; Hu, J. High-Throughput Determination and Characterization of Short-, Medium-, and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Human Blood. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 3346–3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Zou, Y.; Niu, S.; Dong, L.; Hamada, N.; Hashi, Y.; Yang, W.; Xu, P.; Arakawa, K.; Nagata, J. Determination of short-chain chlorinated paraffins using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with low resolution mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1581, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Zhan, N.; Guo, F.; Zhu, S.; Rao, Z. Headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled to comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the determination of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in water samples. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2018, 2018, 2768547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Solid-phase extraction for analysis of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in water samples. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2018, 46, 1102–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Huang, X.; Liu, Q.; Gao, W.; Wang, Y.; Nie, Z.; Yao, S.; Jiang, G. Fast screening of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in indoor dust samples by graphene-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Talanta 2018, 179, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Mézière, M.; Krätschmer, K.; Pērkons, I.; Zacs, D.; Marchand, P.; Dervilly, G.; Le Bizec, B.; Schächtele, A.; Cariou, R.; Vetter, W. Addressing main challenges regarding short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffin analysis using GC/ECNI-MS and LC/ESI-MS methods. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2020, 31, 1885–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. McGrath, T.J.; Poma, G.; Bombeke, J.; Covaci, A. A simplified screening method for short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in food by gas chromatography-low resolution mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2020, 1631, 461574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Mézière, M.; Cariou, R.; Larvor, F.; Bichon, E.; Guitton, Y.; Marchand, P.; Dervilly, G.; Le Bizec, B. Optimized characterization of short-, medium, and long-chain chlorinated paraffins in liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2020, 1619, 460927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Matsukami, A.; Takemori, B.; Takasuga, B.; Kuramochi, A.; Kajiwara, A. Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in mixed plastic wastes. Chemosphere 2020, 244, 125531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Ayala-Cabrera, J.F.; Galceran, M.; Moyano, E.; Santos, F. Chloride-attachment atmospheric pressure photoionisation for the determination of short-chain chlorinated paraffins by gas chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1172, 338673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Tölgyessy, P.; Nagyová, S.; Roško, V.; Hucko, P. Simultaneous determination of short-chain chlorinated paraffins and other classes of persistent organic pollutants in sediment by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry after ultrasonic solvent extraction combined with stir bar sorptive extraction. Chem. Pap. 2021, 75, 5645–5661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Aamir, M.; Yin, S.; Guo, F.; Liu, K.; Xu, C.; Liu, W. Congener-specific mother-fetus distribution, placental retention, and transport of C10-13 and C14-17 chlorinated paraffins in pregnant women. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 11458–11466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Wang, Y.; Gao, W.; Wu, J.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Development of matrix solid-phase dispersion method for the extraction of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in human placenta. J. Environ. Sci. 2017, 62, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Wang, Y.; Gao, W.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Distribution and Pattern Profiles of Chlorinated Paraffins in Human Placenta of Henan Province, China. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2018, 5, 9–13. [Google Scholar]
  204. Chen, H.; Zhou, W.; Lam, J.C.; Ge, J.; Li, J.; Zeng, L. Blood partitioning and whole-blood-based maternal transfer assessment of chlorinated paraffins in mother-infant pairs from South China. Environ. Int. 2020, 142, 105871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Liu, Y.; Aamir, M.; Li, M.; Liu, K.; Hu, Y.; Liu, N.; Xu, Y.; Du, J.; Xu, J.; Liu, W. Prenatal and postnatal exposure risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in mothers and neonates: Occurrence, congener profile, and transfer behavior. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 395, 122660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Yang, L.; Wang, Z.; Li, J.; Ma, Y.; Kong, L.; Yang, H.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, J. Evaluation of short chain chlorinated paraffins in human milk and their intake by infants in Hebei Province, China. Food Addit. Contam. Part A-Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2018, 35, 2011–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Wang, R.; Lin, Y.; Le, S.; Lu, D.; Gao, L.; Feng, C.; Wang, G.; Xiao, P. Short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in breast milk in Shanghai, China: Occurrence, characteristics, and risk assessment. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 347, 123690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Xu, C.; Wang, K.; Gao, L.; Zheng, M.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y.; Qiao, L.; Huang, D.; Wang, S. Highly elevated levels, infant dietary exposure and health risks of medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in breast milk from China: Comparison with short-chain chlorinated paraffins. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 279, 116922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Qiao, L.; Gao, L.; Zheng, M.; Xia, D.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y.; Wang, R.; Cui, L.; Xu, C. Mass Fractions, Congener Group Patterns, and Placental Transfer of Short- and Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Paired Maternal and Cord Serum. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 10097–10103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Xu, J.; Guo, W.; Wei, L.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, M.; Chen, J. Validation of a HRGC-ECNI/LRMS method to monitor short-chain chlorinated paraffins in human plasma. J. Environ. Sci. 2019, 75, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Zhang, J.; Liao, H.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Chen, R.; Han, S.; Liu, S.; Yin, S. Concentrations and homologue patterns of SCCPs and MCCPs in the serum of the general population of adults in Hangzhou, China. Chemosphere 2023, 335, 139131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Zhou, X.; Wu, H.; Huang, X.; Hang, F.; Luo, H. Development a simple and rapid HPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS method for determination of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in human serum. J. Chromatogr. B-Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2019, 1126, 121722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Ding, L.; Luo, N.; Liu, Y.; Fang, X.; Zhang, S.; Li, S.; Jiang, W.; Zhao, N. Short and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in serum from residents aged from 50 to 84 in Jinan, China: Occurrence, composition and association with hematologic parameters. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 728, 137998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Zhao, N.; Fang, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Ding, L.; Xu, C. Male renal functions are associated with serum short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in residents from Jinan, China. Environ. Int. 2021, 153, 106514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Cui, J.; Hua, R.; Wu, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, D.; Ren, G.; An, J.; Quan, S.; Yu, Z. Identification of Hydroxylated Chlorinated Paraffins in Human Serum and Their Potential Metabolic Pathways. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 59, 5487–5495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Han, X.; Chen, H.; Shen, M.; Deng, M.; Du, B.; Zeng, L. Hair and nails as noninvasive bioindicators of human exposure to chlorinated paraffins: Contamination patterns and potential influencing factors. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 798, 149257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Campbell, I.; McConnell, G. Chlorinated paraffins and the environment. 1. Environmental occurrence. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1980, 14, 1209–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Schmid, P.P.; Muller, M.D. Irace Level Detection of Chlorinated Paraffins in Biological and Environmental Samples, Using Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry with Negative-Ion Chemical Ionization. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1985, 68, 427–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Birtley, R.D.N.; Conning, D.M.; Daniel, J.W.; Ferguson, D.M.; Longstaff, E.; Swan, A.A. The toxicological effects of chlorinated paraffins in mammals. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1980, 54, 514–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Bucher, J.R.; Alison, R.H.; Montgomery, C.A.; Huff, J.; Haseman, J.K.; Farnell, D.; Thompson, R.; Prejean, J.D. Comparative toxicity and carcinogenicity of two chlorinated paraffins in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice. Toxicol. Sci. 1987, 9, 454–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Yang, L.; Liu, Y.; Cui, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lian, K. Metabolomic mechanisms of short chain chlorinated paraffins toxicity in rats. Environ. Res. 2021, 197, 111060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Geng, N.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, B.; Wu, P.; Wang, F.; Yu, Z.; Chen, J. Effects of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins Exposure on the Viability and Metabolism of Human Hepatoma HepG2 Cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 3076–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Gong, Y.; Geng, N.; Zhang, H.; Luo, Y.; Giesy, J.P.; Sun, S.; Wu, P.; Yu, Z.; Chen, J. Exposure to short-chain chlorinated paraffins inhibited PPARα-mediated fatty acid oxidation and stimulated aerobic glycolysis in vitro in human cells. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 772, 144957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Kersten, S.; Stienstra, R. The role and regulation of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha in human liver. Biochimie 2017, 136, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Liu, Y.; Han, X.; Zhao, N.; Fang, X.; Zhang, S.; Li, S.; Jiang, W.; Ding, L. The association of liver function biomarkers with internal exposure of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in residents from Jinan, China. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 268, 115762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Luo, Y.; Geng, N.-B.; Chen, S.-S.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, H.-J.; Chen, J.-P. Metabolomic interference induced by short-chain chlorinated paraffins in human normal hepatic cells. Chin. J. Chromatogr. 2024, 42, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Warnasuriya, G.D.; Elcombe, B.M.; Foster, J.R.; Elcombe, C.R. A mechanism for the induction of renal tumours in male Fischer 344 rats by short-chain chlorinated paraffins. Arch. Toxicol. 2010, 84, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Serrone, D.; Birtley, R.; Weigand, W.; Millischer, R. Toxicology of chlorinated paraffins. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1987, 25, 553–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Cooley, H.; Fisk, A.; Wiens, S.; Tomy, G.; Evans, R.; Muir, D. Examination of the behavior and liver and thyroid histology of juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) exposed to high dietary concentrations of C10-, C11-, C12-and C14-polychlorinated n-alkanes. Aquat. Toxicol. 2001, 54, 81–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Wyatt, I.; Coutss, C.; Elcombe, C. The effect of chlorinated paraffins on hepatic enzymes and thyroid hormones. Toxicology 1993, 77, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Ding, W.; Zhao, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, R.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Yu, S.; Liu, L.; Huang, R. Exposure to short-chain chlorinated paraffins induces astrocyte activation via JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 248, 114268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Geng, N.; Zhang, H.; Xing, L.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, B.; Wang, F.; Ren, X.; Chen, J. Toxicokinetics of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in Sprague-Dawley rats following single oral administration. Chemosphere 2016, 145, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Darnerud, P.O.; Biessmann, A.; Brandt, I. Metabolic fate of chlorinated paraffins: Degree of chlorination of [1-14C]-chlorododecanes in relation to degradation and excretion in mice. Arch. Toxicol. 1982, 50, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Glüge, J.; Bogdal, C.; Scheringer, M.; Buser, A.M.; Hungerbühler, K. Calculation of physicochemical properties for short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2013, 42, 023103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Li, Y.; Hou, X.; Chen, W.; Liu, J.; Zhou, Q.; Schnoor, J.L.; Jiang, G. Carbon Chain Decomposition of Short Chain Chlorinated Paraffins Mediated by Pumpkin and Soybean Seedlings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 6765–6772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Gao, W.; Lin, Y.; Liang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, L.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. Percutaneous penetration and dermal exposure risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 126178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Wang, M.; Gao, Y.; Li, G.; An, T. Increased adverse effects during metabolic transformation of short-chain chlorinated paraffins by cytochrome P450: A theoretical insight into 1-chlorodecane. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 407, 124391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. He, C.; van Mourik, L.; Tang, S.; Thai, P.; Wang, X.; Brandsma, S.H.; Leonards, P.E.; Thomas, K.V.; Mueller, J.F. In vitro biotransformation and evaluation of potential transformation products of chlorinated paraffins by high resolution accurate mass spectrometry. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 405, 124245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Lin, L.; Abdallah, M.A.-E.; Chen, L.-J.; Luo, X.-J.; Mai, B.-X.; Harrad, S. Comparative in vitro metabolism of short chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) by human and chicken liver microsomes: First insight into heptachlorodecanes. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 851, 158261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Dong, Z.; Li, T.; Wan, Y.; Sun, Y.; Hu, J. Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Chlorinated Paraffins in Rats and Humans: Importance of Biliary Excretion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 938–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Ding, Q.; Ding, N.; Chen, X.; Wu, C.-M.L. Chlorinated paraffins wrapping of carbon nanotubes: A theoretical investigation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 436, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Zhang, W.; Gao, Y.; Qin, Y.; Wang, M.; Wu, J.; Li, G.; An, T. Photochemical degradation kinetics and mechanism of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in aqueous solution: A case of 1-chlorodecane. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 247, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Yuan, B.; Wang, Y.; Fu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, G. An analytical method for chlorinated paraffins and their determination in soil samples. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2010, 55, 2396–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Idris, I.; Srinivasan, R.; Simm, A.; Page, R.C. Maternal hypothyroidism in early and late gestation: Effects on neonatal and obstetric outcome. Clin. Endocrinol. 2005, 63, 560–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Morreale de Escobar, G.; Obregón, M.J.; Escobar del Rey, F. Role of thyroid hormone during early brain development. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2004, 151, U25–U37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Pearson-Stuttard, J.; Holloway, S.; Polya, R.; Sloan, R.; Zhang, L.; Gregg, E.W.; Harrison, K.; Elvidge, J.; Jonsson, P.; Porter, T. Variations in comorbidity burden in people with type 2 diabetes over disease duration: A population-based analysis of real world evidence. eClinicalMedicine 2022, 52, 101584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Zhang, G.; Zhang, Q.; Guan, X.; Liu, M.; Meng, L.; Han, X.; Li, Y.; Jiang, G. Short-chain chlorinated paraffin (SCCP) exposure and type 2 diabetes risk: A population-based case-control study in East China. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 908, 168192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Huang, J.-W.; He, W.-T.; Zhang, Y.-T.; Yang, M.; Jin, N.-X.; Leskinen, A.; Komppula, M.; Roponen, M.; Lin, L.-Z.; Gui, Z.-H. Chlorinated paraffins in particulate matter associated with asthma and its relative symptoms in school-aged children and adolescents: A cross-sectional survey in South China. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 958, 178112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. UNEP. Report of the Conference of the Parties to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants on the Work of Its Eighth Meeting; POPRC; Stockholm Convention, 2017; Available online: https://chm.pops.int/TheConvention/ConferenceoftheParties/Meetings/COP8/tabid/5309/Default.aspx (accessed on 22 June 2026).
  250. Chen, C.; Li, L.; Wania, F. Exploring the Long-Term Human Exposure to Short-, Medium-, and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins under Variant Environmental Release Trends and Patterns. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 59, 16304–16313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  251. Kobetičová, K.; Černý, R. Ecotoxicity assessment of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins used in polyvinyl-chloride products for construction industry. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 640, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Hu, Q.; Zeng, K.; Han, S.; Xu, J.; Hu, W.; Li, J. Synthesis and Performance Evaluation of Metallocene Polyalphaolefins (mPAO) Base Oil with Anti-Friction and Anti-Wear Properties. Polymers 2024, 16, 2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Zhang, J.; Li, G.; Yuan, X.; Li, P.; Yu, Y.; Yang, W.; Zhao, S. Reduction of Ultrafiltration Membrane Fouling by the Pretreatment Removal of Emerging Pollutants: A Review. Membranes 2023, 13, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Lahaniatis, M.R.; Coelhan, M.; Parlar, H. Clean-up and quantification of short and medium chain polychlorinated n-alkanes in fish, fish oil and fish feed. Organohalogen Compd. 2000, 47, 276. [Google Scholar]
  255. Zhang, Z.-Y.; Lu, M.; Zhang, Z.-Z.; Xiao, M.; Zhang, M. Dechlorination of short chain chlorinated paraffins by nanoscale zero-valent iron. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 243, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Dong, H.; Zeng, G.; Tang, L.; Fan, C.; Zhang, C.; He, X.; He, Y. An overview on limitations of TiO2-based particles for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants and the corresponding countermeasures. Water Res. 2015, 79, 128–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  257. Ong, C.B.; Ng, L.Y.; Mohammad, A.W. A review of ZnO nanoparticles as solar photocatalysts: Synthesis, mechanisms and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 536–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Sullivan, I.; Zoellner, B.; Maggard, P.A. Copper(I)-Based p-Type Oxides for Photoelectrochemical and Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conversion. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 5999–6016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Liang, C.; Zhang, L.; Guo, H.; Niu, C.-G.; Wen, X.-J.; Tang, N.; Liu, H.-Y.; Yang, Y.-Y.; Shao, B.-B.; Zeng, G.-M. Photo-removal of 2,2′4,4′-tetrabromodiphenyl ether in liquid medium by reduced graphene oxide bridged artificial Z-scheme system of Ag@Ag3PO4/g-C3N4. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 361, 373–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Lee, Y.; Cui, M.; Choi, J.; Kim, J.; Son, Y.; Khim, J. Degradation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in real-field soil by an integrated visible-light photocatalysis and solvent migration system with pn heterojunction BiVO4/Bi2O3. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 344, 1116–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. Xie, X.; Kretschmer, K.; Wang, G. Advances in graphene-based semiconductor photocatalysts for solar energy conversion: Fundamentals and materials engineering. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 13278–13292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Zhang, G.; Zhang, X.; Meng, Y.; Pan, G.; Ni, Z.; Xia, S. Layered double hydroxides-based photocatalysts and visible-light driven photodegradation of organic pollutants: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 392, 123684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. El-Morsi, T.M.; Emara, M.M.; Abd El Bary, H.M.; Abd-El-Aziz, A.S.; Friesen, K.J. Homogeneous degradation of 1,2,9,10-tetrachlorodecane in aqueous solutions using hydrogen peroxide, iron and UV light. Chemosphere 2002, 47, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Chen, X.; Zhao, Q.; Li, X.; Wang, D. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of degrading short chain chlorinated paraffins over reduced graphene oxide/CoFe2O4/Ag nanocomposite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 479, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Xiong, W.; Li, X.; Zhao, Q.; Shi, Y.; Hao, C. Insight into the photocatalytic mineralization of short chain chlorinated paraffins boosted by polydopamine and Ag nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 359, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Ma, Y.; Li, Q.; Su, G.; Duan, H.; Wang, T.; Khim, J.S.; Hong, S.; Sun, B.; Meng, J.; Shi, B. Occurrence and remediation of chlorinated paraffins in global environmental matrices: Levels, trends, and future prospects. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 55, 1730–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Patel, A.K.; Singhania, R.R.; Albarico, F.P.J.B.; Pandey, A.; Chen, C.-W.; Dong, C.-D. Organic wastes bioremediation and its changing prospects. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 824, 153889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  268. Kumar, M.; Bolan, N.; Jasemizad, T.; Padhye, L.P.; Sridharan, S.; Singh, L.; Bolan, S.; O’Connor, J.; Zhao, H.; Shaheen, S.M. Mobilization of contaminants: Potential for soil remediation and unintended consequences. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 839, 156373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. Wang, L.; Zhang, X.; Tang, C.; Li, P.; Zhu, R.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, H.; Ma, J.; Song, X. Engineering consortia by polymeric microbial swarmbots. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  270. Wei, J.; Wang, X.; Tu, C.; Long, T.; Bu, Y.; Wang, H.; Jeyakumar, P.; Jiang, J.; Deng, S. Remediation technologies for neonicotinoids in contaminated environments: Current state and future prospects. Environ. Int. 2023, 178, 108044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  271. Madeley, J.R.; Birtley, R.D. Chlorinated paraffins and the environment. 2. Aquatic and avian toxicology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1980, 14, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Lu, M. Degradation of short chain polychlorinated paraffins by a new isolate: Tests in pure culture and sewage sludge. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2013, 88, 1273–1279. [Google Scholar]
  273. Yaashikaa, P.; Kumar, P.S. Bioremediation of hazardous pollutants from agricultural soils: A sustainable approach for waste management towards urban sustainability. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 312, 120031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Zhu, J.; Zhang, J.; Fu, J.; Zhan, M.; Wang, J.; Xu, X.; Jiao, W. A Review of Chlorinated Paraffins: Occurrence in Soil, Regulation and Remediation Technologies. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2025, 263, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Li, Y.; Hou, X.; Yu, M.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, J.; Schnoor, J.L.; Jiang, G. Dechlorination and chlorine rearrangement of 1,2,5,5,6,9,10-heptachlorodecane mediated by the whole pumpkin seedlings. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 224, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Li, Y.; Chen, W.; Kong, W.; Liu, J.; Schnoor, J.L.; Jiang, G. Transformation of 1, 1, 1, 3, 8, 10, 10, 10-octachlorodecane in air phase increased by phytogenic volatile organic compounds of pumpkin seedlings. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 704, 135455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  277. Huang, H.; Zhang, S.; Shan, X.-q.; Chen, B.-D.; Zhu, Y.-G.; Bell, J.N.B. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus caledonium) on the accumulation and metabolism of atrazine in maize (Zea mays L.) and atrazine dissipation in soil. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 146, 452–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  278. Huang, H.; Zhang, S.; Wu, N.; Luo, L.; Christie, P. Influence of Glomus etunicatum/Zea mays mycorrhiza on atrazine degradation, soil phosphatase and dehydrogenase activities, and soil microbial community structure. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41, 726–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Wang, S.; Zhang, S.; Huang, H.; Christie, P. Behavior of decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) in soil: Effects of rhizosphere and mycorrhizal colonization of ryegrass roots. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 749–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  280. Wu, N.; Huang, H.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, Y.-G.; Christie, P.; Zhang, Y. Phenanthrene uptake by Medicago sativa L. under the influence of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 1613–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  281. Wu, N.; Zhang, S.; Huang, H.; Shan, X.; Christie, P.; Wang, Y. DDT uptake by arbuscular mycorrhizal alfalfa and depletion in soil as influenced by soil application of a non-ionic surfactant. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 151, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Number of publications collected from the topics of chlorinated paraffins (CPs), LCCPs, MCCPs, and SCCPs from 2015 to 2025 (31 December 2025) using the Web of Science; (b) the number of published papers related to CPs and SCCPs per year from 2015 to 2025.
Figure 1. (a) Number of publications collected from the topics of chlorinated paraffins (CPs), LCCPs, MCCPs, and SCCPs from 2015 to 2025 (31 December 2025) using the Web of Science; (b) the number of published papers related to CPs and SCCPs per year from 2015 to 2025.
Toxics 14 00567 g001
Figure 2. Toxicity and adverse health effects of SCCPs in humans.
Figure 2. Toxicity and adverse health effects of SCCPs in humans.
Toxics 14 00567 g002
Table 1. SCCP concentrations in air, water, soil, sediment, biota, and food samples collected from various regions across China (note: dw = dry weight; ww = wet weight; ND = not detected; NA = not available).
Table 1. SCCP concentrations in air, water, soil, sediment, biota, and food samples collected from various regions across China (note: dw = dry weight; ww = wet weight; ND = not detected; NA = not available).
RegionAir (ng/m3)Water (ng/L)Soil
(ng/g dw)
Sediment (ng/g dw)Biota
(ng/g dw)
Food
(ng/g ww)
Gas PhaseParticle Phase
Eastern China6.08–3339.8–14427.4–1978ND-554,161ND-16,000ND-30,000ND-649
Southern China1.11–39.80.832–10961.0–460ND-5090ND-350,00011.1–70,40017–69
Northern China9.77–135016.9–87.720–56,306121–5159131.8–8700320–427011.7–248
Central ChinaNANA1131–65,640NA4.19–397,600NANA
Southwestern China1.01–14.4NANA0.22–948NANAND-42,900
Northeastern China4.04–7815.1–1684.1–149024.8–182464.9–1683374–1700NA
China Sea areasNA3.31–30.412.2–430NA9.38–17579.3–9100NA
Background area0.13–1.27NANA56.8–1348NA3.9–107NA
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Niu, J.; Qiu, Z.; Yang, J.; Liu, S.; Niu, L.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, S.; Mao, S.; Liu, W. Investigating Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs) in China: A Review of Occurrences, Determination Techniques, Human Exposure Routes, Toxicity, and Risk Assessments. Toxics 2026, 14, 567. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14070567

AMA Style

Niu J, Qiu Z, Yang J, Liu S, Niu L, Guo Z, Zhang S, Mao S, Liu W. Investigating Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs) in China: A Review of Occurrences, Determination Techniques, Human Exposure Routes, Toxicity, and Risk Assessments. Toxics. 2026; 14(7):567. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14070567

Chicago/Turabian Style

Niu, Jiangbo, Zixuan Qiu, Jiaying Yang, Shuren Liu, Lili Niu, Zili Guo, Shuang Zhang, Shuduan Mao, and Weiping Liu. 2026. "Investigating Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs) in China: A Review of Occurrences, Determination Techniques, Human Exposure Routes, Toxicity, and Risk Assessments" Toxics 14, no. 7: 567. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14070567

APA Style

Niu, J., Qiu, Z., Yang, J., Liu, S., Niu, L., Guo, Z., Zhang, S., Mao, S., & Liu, W. (2026). Investigating Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs) in China: A Review of Occurrences, Determination Techniques, Human Exposure Routes, Toxicity, and Risk Assessments. Toxics, 14(7), 567. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14070567

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop