Next Article in Journal
Pesticides and Parabens Contaminating Aquatic Environment: Acute and Sub-Chronic Toxicity towards Early-Life Stages of Freshwater Fish and Amphibians
Next Article in Special Issue
Chemical Survey and Risk Assessment of 56 Pesticides in the Sado River Estuary (Iberian Peninsula, Portugal)
Previous Article in Journal
Lack of Known Target-Site Mutations in Field Populations of Ostrinia furnacalis in China from 2019 to 2021
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Innovation through Developing Hybrid Agri-Food Supply Chains: A Case in South-Eastern Spain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Concept Paper

Biological and Physiological Responses of Root-knot Disease Development on Five Cucurbits Exposed to Different Concentrations of Sulfur Dioxide

by
Tanveer Fatima Rizvi
* and
Mujeebur Rahman Khan
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2023, 11(4), 334; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040334
Submission received: 23 January 2023 / Revised: 16 March 2023 / Accepted: 29 March 2023 / Published: 31 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pollution Caused by Agriculture and Its Mitigation Measures)

Abstract

:
A study was undertaken in order to investigate the effects of SO2 (25, 50, and 75 ppb) exposure for five hours on alternate days for three months on the susceptibility of five cucurbits to the infection of Meloidogyne incognita, causing root-knot disease. Four-week-old cucurbit plants were inoculated with 2000 J2 of M. incognita. SO2 levels of 50 and 75 ppb caused noticeable injury to foliage and reduced the plant growth parameters and biomass production of cucurbits (p ≤ 0.05). Nematode-inoculated plants caused characteristic oval, fleshy and large galls. The galls were formed closely, and as a result they coalesced, giving bead-like impressions especially in pumpkin and sponge gourds. Disease severity became aggravated on plants exposed to SO2 at 50 or 75 ppb concentrations. The nematode and SO2 interaction varied with the levels of SO2 and the response of the plant to M. incognita. SO2 at 50 or 75 ppb concentrations stimulated the pathogenesis of M. incognita on cucurbit species. The combined effect of 75 ppb SO2 and M. incognita suppressed plant length by 34% against the sum of decreases observed by M. incognita and SO2 individually (14–18%). At 50 ppb SO2, the fecundity of M. incognita was decreased and combined effect of SO2 and M. incognita was more than the sum of their singular effects. The study has proven that root-knot disease might become aggravated in the regions contaminated with elevated levels of SO2.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The growth and survival of living beings mainly depend on air, which is a scarce commodity. Due to emissions from diversified industrialization and several other urban activities, the constitution of air’s small elements might change. Fossil fuels are still the prime energy source for running industry in developing countries, which results in high SO2 emission levels [1]. Amongst the most significant air pollutants, SO2 is common in areas utilizing coal as a key source of energy [2,3]. The utilization and production of petroleum products are another major cause of SO2 liberation [4,5]. In developing countries like India, the chief source of SO2 production is thermal power plants, where an average of 125 million tons of coal is burnt per year [6]. These power plants are mostly located in rural areas, which means that a major portion of agricultural land is exposed to SO2 [7], leading to a negative effect on plant growth [8]. SO2 at 50–150 ppb (parts per billion) concentrations causes injury to green plants, depending on the species [9]. SO2 is a toxic gas, and causes distinguishing symptoms on leaves such as chlorosis, browning and yellowing [10]. Some studies have reported characteristic interveinal necrosis and the browning of leaves at 50 ppb SO2 [11].
As a consequence of injury caused by the gas, photosynthesis and other metabolic processes of plants are affected severely [12]. It is quite possible that SO2 may also affect the vulnerability of the plant to pathogens and/or its pathogenicity, if the infected plants are exposed to environments with higher concentrations of SO2 [7]. The above studies proved that SO2 exposures may influence the pathogenesis of phyto-nematodes, and the plants exposed may react differently to the pathogen [9]. Cucurbits are susceptible crops for root-knot nematode, and exhibit reduction in the yield [13]. The susceptibility of this crop to the pathogen may be influenced when plants are exposed to SO2 gas [14]. It is, therefore, important to study the effects of root-knot nematode on susceptible plants under elevated SO2 levels. The evidence available suggests that greater SO2 concentrations may have an impact on the development of plant diseases brought on by nematodes, despite the fact that few studies have been conducted to examine disease development under high SO2 levels. In the current study, root-knot disease induced by M. incognita on five cucurbits, including pumpkin, bitter gourd, bottle gourd, sponge gourd and cucumber, was evaluated in open-top chambers to determine the influence of SO2 relevant to the current and future anticipated ambient levels. Along with morphological factors, significant physiological, biochemical, and anatomical factors were also examined in connection with SO2 exposure and nematode inoculation (J2), including photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, phenolic acid content, salicylic acid content, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll, and carotenoid contents.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Exposure System

Plants were subjected to SO2 exposure using 2 × 2.5 m (diameter × height) cylindrical open-top exposure chambers (OTCs; Figure 1). These OTCs were in dynamic condition, and no stagnation of air was observed in any area of the OTC [15]. The airflow within the chamber ranged between 0.2 and 0.5 m/s at various heights, and the air was completely replaced after every 1.0 to 1.5 min. As the chambers were made of transparent polythene sheets and had open tops, no significant changes in the incidence of sunlight were observed. In order to introduce the SO2 air mixture into the chamber, the inferior half of the chambers’ walls were made of two layers, and the internal layer of the wall was perforated. A gas cylinder containing a mixture of 50% SO2 and 50% N2 was used to introduce the SO2 gas into the OTCs (Sigma Gases, New Delhi, India). With the help of the SO2 gas analyzer, the amount of SO2 in the chamber was measured (EC9820 Ecotech, Melbourne, Australia; Figure 1).
To determine the SO2 level within the chamber, 3 Teflon input pipes were installed at heights of 1, 2, and 3 feet. A Teflon suction pump fed the air and gas combination to the SO2 gas analyzer. The SO2 content varied by 1 to 3 percent at different heights, according to the data. In order to reduce locational variability in the SO2 level, samples of SO2 were taken from the top three heights within the chamber during the exposure of the plants. In each chamber, SO2 levels were monitored once every 45 min for 5 min of sampling. To drain extra gas mixture, an exhaust pump was installed at the SO2 analyzer’s exhaust aperture. The rate of SO2 gas flow from the cylinder and the blowing assembly speed were controlled to maintain the desired level of SO2, which was 25, 50, and 75 ppb (5 h mean) [15].
Eight identically shaped exposure chambers were installed. In order to prevent the returning of the SO2–air mixture exhausted from the top, the chambers were positioned in a field with 7–8 m spacing. The area was located at 27°55′23.6″ N 78°04′29.2″ E, and the weather was mostly semi-arid [15]. Eight experimental treatments, i.e., four SO2 levels (ambient, 25, 50, and 75 ppb) with root-knot nematode inoculation, and the four SO2 level without nematode, were maintained. Two similar exposure chambers were used to expose the uninoculated control species (without M. incognita) and inoculated control species (with M. incognita) to ambient air (containing 3–5 ppb SO2). The rate of air flow and exposure period were also similar for both sets of plants. After the exposure, the pots were left within the chambers.

2.2. Isolation, Identification and Mass Culturing of Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita

Infected root samples collected during the survey were gently washed and examined for the presence of egg masses and galls. M. incognita Kofoid and White was identified on the basis of perineal pattern [16]. Mature females were dissected from the galls, and perineal patterns were prepared and examined microscopically for the identification of M. incognita. Since root-knot nematode is an obligate parasite, its pure culture was maintained on eggplant, tomato and cucurbits. The pure culturing of M. incognita was initiated with single egg mass inoculation in eggplant, Solanum melongena L. cv. Pusa Purple Long in clay pots followed by the inoculation of eggplant seedlings, with the nematode culture emerging from the single egg mass inoculated plants. Mass culture of the nematode was maintained on perennial eggplant cv. Pusa Purple Round in a culture bed.

2.3. Inoculation with Root-Knot Nematode

Egg masses were excised from the eggplant’s roots, which were grown in the nematode culture bed. The egg masses were incubated on a wire gauge placed on a Petri plate with sufficient water at 30 °C for 7 days inside a BOD incubator. Nematode larvae (J2) hatched out from the eggs were collected and stored with water in a refrigerator. Three-week-old plants in pots were inoculated with the nematode suspension containing 2000 s stage juveniles of M. incognita plant.

2.4. Germplasm Collection and Plant Culture

The germplasm of five tested cucurbits viz., bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.), pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.), sponge gourd (Luffa cylendrica (L.) M. Roemd.), bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) were purchased from the ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi, India. It was unknown how these cucurbits would react to SO2 exposure and/or infection with root-knot nematode. All of the seeds underwent 0.5% NaOCl surface sterilization. In clay pots with a 15 cm diameter, 4 seeds/pot were sown in a 3:1 autoclaved field soil and compost mixture. Seedlings were trimmed 4 weeks after sowing in order to have one seedling in each pot. Then, after, the pots were transferred into the OTCs and the nematode inoculation was carried out. For each treatment, five replicates were maintained. On alternate days, 250 mL of tap water was used to water the pots. Intermittent exposures started on alternate days (two days after the inoculation of cucurbits with root-knot nematode), which lasted for three months (total of 46 exposures of 5 h duration). Throughout the experiment, the plants were monitored regularly for symptoms of root-knot, SO2 injury, etc. The symptoms, soil population, number of galls and egg masses of root-knot nematode, gas injury, plant length, photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, salicylic acid levels, stomatal conductance, total phenols, and leaf pigments were all measured at the time of harvest.

2.5. Soil Population, Number of Galls and Egg Masses of M. incognita

At harvest, roots were gently washed with water and then examined to count the number of galls and egg masses. Soil populations of the nematode were evaluated using Cobb’s decanting and sieving method [17].

2.6. Estimation of Chlorophyll and Carotenoid Contents

Total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents present in the leaves of the tested cucurbits were estimated at the time of harvest using the Lichtenthaler and Buschmann method [18]. A total of 1 g of fresh leaves from interveinal regions was ground in 80% acetone (40 mL) with the use of a mortar and pestle. After that, the solution was poured into a Buchner funnel covered with Whatman filter paper (No. 1). With the assistance of a suction pump, the filtration was completed. Acetone was added, and the residue was crushed thrice in it. In the Buchner funnel, the suspension was then transferred before being filtered under vacuum. Afterwards, the mortar and pestle were washed with the acetone and suspension was poured into the funnel for filtration. In a volumetric flask measuring 100 mL, the filtrate was decanted. Acetone was added to bring the volume up to the capacity. A UV spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan) was used to measure the optical density (OD) of the filtrate at 470 nm for carotenoids and at 645 and 662 nm for total chlorophyll contents [18].

2.7. Determination of Number of Trichomes and Stomata

Fully grown and fresh leaves (2–3 leaves per plant) of roughly the same size and age were preserved in 70% ethyl alcohol after being fixed in formalin aceto-alcohol (FAA). To remove the epidermal peels, 1 cm2 pieces of the leaves were then cut into pieces and boiled in HNO3 (4%) [19]. After being rinsed with tap water, the peels were stained with hematoxylin and iron-alum. The peels were mounted in Canada balsam for microscopic inspection after being dehydrated in alcohol series. An assessment of the number of stomata and trichomes/cm2 peel was calculated.

2.8. Estimation of Foliar Phenolic Compounds and Salicylic Acid Contents

Leaves of cucurbit species were taken at the time of harvest from each treatment and chopped into pieces that ranged in size from 0.5 to 1.0 cm. Then, pieces of 1 g were soaked in water for one night. Whatman filter paper (No. 1) was used to filter the suspension. After completing the ethyl acetate fraction, the water content was removed using Na2SO4 and the solution was then evaporated with the help of a water bath. The dried sample was mixed with 10 mL of methanol, and the suspension was then used to measure the absorbance at 306 nm with a spectrophotometer (UV 2450, Shimadzu, Japan). Salicylic acid levels of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 100 ppb in methanol were used to prepare the salicylic acid standard curve. The formula y = mx c was used to calculate the salicylic acid concentration in the sample based on the standard curve [20].
A modified Folin–Ciocalteu technique was used to assess the total phenolic contents of each leaf [21]. The filtrate was diluted through distilled water (0.4 mg/5 mL). Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (2.5 mL, 1/10) was mixed with the diluted solution (0.5 mL). After allowing the mixture to sit at room temperature for two minutes, an aqueous solution of sodium carbonate (2 mL; 75 g/L) was added to the solution. The mixture was completely blended, incubated for 15 min at 50 °C, and allowed to cool in an ice bath. A blank was made using only distilled water. The absorbances were determined using a UV spectrophotometer at 760 nm (Shimadzu, Japan). Then, 1–8 µg/mL of Gallic acid was used for the preparation of a calibration curve. According to the calibration curve, y = 0.133x + 0.001 (r2 = 0.999), where x specifies the concentration of Gallic acid in mg/L and y denotes the absorbance. The total phenolics were estimated in mg of Gallic acid equivalents/g of dry extract [21].

2.9. Physiological Parameters

The stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, and transpiration rate were evaluated using the portable photosynthesis analyzer (LI625XT, Li Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA) and Fluorescence Analyzer (PAM, Walz, Germany). These variables are essential for determining the overall effects of SO2 on the physiology of a plant [15].

2.10. Statistical Analysis

To evaluate the reproducibility of the results, experimentations with identical treatments were repeated for 2 years. At p ≤ 0.05, it was determined that the effects of nematode infestation and SO2 levels on the study’s variables were statistically identical across 2 years. Therefore, the 2 years’ data were pooled. For each treatment, the mean of 5 replicates/year (10 replicates) were evaluated and represented in tables and figures. A 2-factor analysis of variance was applied to the data (10 repetitions). The SO2 concentrations (4 treatments, 3–5, 25, 50, and 75 ppb) were treated as factor one, and the root-knot nematode inoculation as factor two (2 treatments). The Tukey honest significant difference test was applied for pair-wise comparison of contrasts related to SO2 levels and their interactions with nematodes. Whole analysis was carried out using the “R” software package [22]. Using the Agricolae package of R software, LSD was evaluated to ascertain significant treatments at probability levels of p ≤ 0.05. The data on plant length, photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, salicylic acid and total phenolic content, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll and carotenoids content, and number of trichomes and stomata were subjected to the 3-factor analysis. By using a 2-factor ANOVA analysis, the impact of SO2 levels on disease severity, nematode population, number of galls, and fecundity were evaluated. Significant treatments were found at probability levels of p ≤ 0.05 [23]. The percentage increase or decrease in comparison to the control was evaluated and used to explain the results.

3. Results

3.1. Symptoms

Inoculation with 2000 J2 of M. incognita caused characteristic oval, fleshy and large galls on the roots of cucurbits (Figure 2). The galls were formed closely, and as a result they coalesced, giving bead-like impressions, especially in pumpkin and sponge gourds. The bitter gourd was found almost resistant to the nematodes, as only a few galls were formed on this crop. The order of severity of the root-knot disease in terms of number of galls and egg masses in tested cucurbits evaluated was pumpkin (46%) > bottle gourd (43%), sponge gourd (43%) > cucumber (39%) > bitter gourd (18%).
The exposure of plants to SO2 promoted galling in all the cucurbits. A significant increase in the number of galls/root system was recorded at 50 and 75 ppb for exposed plants. The egg mass production was also significantly increased at this concentration. The soil population of the nematode was significantly increased in 50 and 75 ppb SO2-exposed plants (Figure 3). The bitter gourd produced negligible galls, as it had some resistance against the nematode. However, the exposure of SO2 broke the resistance in bitter gourd, especially at 50 and 75 ppb concentrations. The order of susceptibility of the cucurbits to M. incognita was pumpkin > bottle gourd > sponge gourd > cucumber > bitter gourd.
The orthogonal contrasts prepared between SO2 levels and galling on pumpkin showed mostly significant interactions between SO2 and M. incognita, as only a few contrasts lay on the broken vertical line of no difference. Maximum synergistic interaction with regard to an increase in the galling was observed at 75 ppb SO2, as this contrast was situated at the furthest location from the line of no difference (Figure 4). The interactive and individual effects of SO2, crops and M. incognita were significant at p ≤ 0.001 (Table 1).

3.2. Gas Injury

The five cucurbits, viz., bitter gourd, bottle gourd, cucumber, pumpkin, and sponge gourd tested in the study were found to be sensitive to 50–75 ppb SO2 and developed characteristic marginal and interveinal chlorosis and browning, especially at 75 ppb concentration (Figure 5).

3.3. Plant Growth Parameters

Intermittent exposures of SO2 decreased the plant length and biomass production of plants. The decrease in the plant growth parameters was significant for all tested cucurbit species, with relatively greater damage to pumpkin and sponge gourd at 50 and 75 ppb SO2 in comparison to 25 ppb SO2 or control (ambient air, 3–5 ppb SO2). In addition, all species of cucurbits used in experiment, with the exception of the bitter gourd, have seen a substantial reduction in length and dry weight (shoot) after inoculation with root-knot nematode in comparison to the uninoculated control (p ≤ 0.05; Figure 6; Table 2). However, in plants inoculated with root-knot nematode, the dry weight of the root increased to some extent due to the formation of galls and egg masses. The nematode’s individual impacts on the aforementioned two variables were shown to be significant by ANOVA at p ≤ 0.001. A major decrease in the plant growth was recorded in concomitantly inoculated and exposed cucurbit plants as compared to the control. The singular effects of SO2 at p ≤ 0.05 on the plant growth parameters and root-knot nematode were significant at p ≤ 0.001. Overall, the order of decrease in plant growth parameters was pumpkin > sponge gourd > bottle gourd and cucumber > bitter gourd, as compared to the respective control (Figure 7).
The interaction between M. incognita and 75 ppb SO2 was found to be synergistic, resulting in a reduction in plant height of more than the addition of decrease caused by 75 ppb SO2 and nematode singly. For example, 75 ppb SO2 decreased the plant height by 18%, whereas M. incognita inoculation decreased plant height by 14%; the sum is 32%. The combined treatment of M. incognita with 75 ppb SO2 led to a 34% reduction in plant length (Figure 7). Although this was 2% greater than the sum of individual effects (synergistic interaction), statistically it is not significant at p ≤ 0.05. Hence, the interaction of the nematode at 75 ppb SO2 was statistically additive for most of the plant growth variables (Figure 7). However, a nearly additive interaction was recorded for 25 ppb SO2 and the nematode.

3.4. Number of Trichome and Stomata

SO2 exposures induced some modification on the epidermal characteristics of cucurbit leaves. The 50 and 75 ppb SO2 concentrations decreased the frequency of trichomes and stomata per unit leaf surface over the control (Table 3), whereas in nematode-infected plants these epidermal characters were not significant; in concomitantly exposed and inoculated plants, the frequency of trichomes and stomata decreased compared to the respective control. Overall, the stomatal density and the number of trichomes on the surface of the leaves in plants with the nematode inoculation were lower, significantly, than in uninoculated plants in the SO2 treatments (p ≤ 0.05).
In exposed and inoculated plants, the density of the stomata and trichome decreased significantly and the maximum decrease was observed at the 75 ppb concentration of SO2 (19–32%), followed by 50 (18–30%), 25 (9–11%), and ambient concentrations (Table 3).

3.5. Foliar Pigments, Salicylic Acid Contents and Phenolic Compounds

Alternating the exposures of 50 ppb SO2 to plants caused in a significant rise in TPC (total phenolic content) and SAC (salicylic acid contents) of the leaf as compared to 25 ppb SO2 or the respective control (p ≤ 0.05; Table 4). Inoculation with M. incognita caused a significant rise (p ≤ 0.05) in SAC and TPC for all cucurbits species used in the experiment when compared to the control (9–11%; p ≤ 0.05; Table 4; Figure 8). The cumulative effects of SO2 and nematode on SAC and TPC were almost equal to the total increase in SAC and TPC caused by M. incognita and SO2 separately. The effects of SO2 and the nematode on the SAC were determined to be significant at p ≤ 0.001 (Table 4).
Chlorophyll content decreased with the increasing SO2 levels, and the maximum decrease was recorded at 75 ppb SO2 (Figure 9). When exposed to 50 and 75 ppb SO2, the contents of leaf carotenoids were reduced in comparison to the corresponding controls (Table 4). Inoculation with the nematode resulted in a significant decrease in chlorophyll content and carotenoids in all tested cucurbits in comparison to the respective controls. The sequence of the decrease in chlorophyll and carotenoid contents was: pumpkin > cucumber > bottle gourd > sponge gourd > bitter gourd. Chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in inoculated as well as exposed plants (50 or 75 ppb SO2) exhibited a further decrease when compared to nematode-injected corresponding controls (10–21%; Table 4; Figure 9). ANOVA revealed that the individual and combined effects of SO2 and the nematode were significant for each at p ≤ 0.001.

3.6. Rate of Photosynthesis and Transpiration and Stomatal Conductance

With increasing SO2 levels, the photosynthesis rate of inoculated plants dropped significantly (Figure 10). The lowest photosynthetic rate was reported as 11–15% lower than the control at 75 ppb SO2. The photosynthesis rate at 50 ppb SO2 was reduced by 9–11%, i.e., 4–5% lesser than 75 ppb, but significantly lower than at 25 ppb SO2 and ambient control. The difference between 25 ppb SO2 and ambient control (3–5 ppb) was negligible. However, in contrast to the ambient control, the transpiration rate and stomatal conductance considerably increased with increasing SO2 levels (Table 5). According to statistics, the trend in the rise in stomatal conductance or transpiration rate was more or less equivalent to the decrease in photosynthetic rate at p ≤ 0.05. Comparing plants that had been infected with M. incognita to those that had not indicated a substantial reduction in the rate of photosynthetic activity, and increases in the rate of transpiration and stomatal conductance were observed as well. The order of the different cucurbits’ decreased photosynthetic rates and increased transpiration rates as a result of root-knot disease was: pumpkin > bottle gourd > sponge gourd > cucumber > bitter gourd (Figure 10; Table 5). The stomatal conductance’s response pattern and rate of transpiration were statistically identical.
The physiological factors of cucurbits responded to intermittent inoculation and exposure in a manner that was mostly consistent with the effects seen from M. incognita and SO2 levels individually. In comparison to the nematode-inoculated control, the photosynthesis rate in the nematode plus SO2 treatments reduced with increasing amounts of SO2 (25–75 ppb), but it was higher considerably than that in the SO2 exposed plants without inoculation of the nematode (p ≤ 0.05). Likewise, the stomatal conductance and transpiration rates also increased further with the increasing SO2 levels in inoculated and exposed plants.

4. Discussion

The cucurbit plants inoculated with second stage juvenile of M. incognita were found to be susceptible to the nematode and established distinctive symptoms of root-knot [24]. However, the bitter gourd showed lesser vulnerability to root-knot nematode damage. The infection process of Meloidogyne species in susceptible hosts started with the oriented movement of the juveniles through the chemical stimuli emanated in the form of root exudates. After approaching the root, the nematode juvenile started making perforations on the surface to enter into the roots of a susceptible plant species/cultivar [25]. On the other hand, the nematode-repellent substances present in the roots of non-host/immune plants opposed the nematode invasion. Hence, interactions between plants and nematodes could take place practically even before the nematode reached the plant roots [26]. The single-resistance dominant genes from plant interaction related to avirulence (Avr) genes in nematodes created an incompatible association, in contrast to compatible plant-nematode associations that took place in susceptible hosts [27]. This unfavorable association initiated a chain of plant reactions to counter the nematode-defense mechanisms [28]. As the Meloidogyne juveniles entered the plant roots, the Avr genes of the nematode produced effectors that caused the development and expression of Mi-resistant genes in plants, resulting in a sort of hypersensitive reaction [29]. The guard hypothesis is the second host-specific defense’s strategy, where nematode effectors first activate the plant virulence factors, which then activate the R-gene [30]. In addition, there are various other mechanisms of resistance, and thus the host defense depends on the activation of many identified and unidentified R-genes [31,32,33]. The symptoms of root-knot first appeared on the roots, and later galls could be seen in nodal and intermodal areas of the stem [25]. One of the most vulnerable hosts for M. incognita are cucurbit plants, and the development of galls, particularly on the roots, is a characteristic sign that the nematode has infected the plant. However, among the five different types of cucurbits, the disease severity varied considerably. According to reports, even though M. incognita is a pathogen of the majority of cucurbits, the relative vulnerability of each genus varies widely, and bitter gourd exhibits lower susceptibility than other cucurbits, as seen in the current study.
Root-knot nematode inoculation caused a substantial decrease in photosynthesis, leaf pigmentation, and plant development, as well as a rise in salicylic acid and phenolic content, the rate of transpiration and stomatal conductance, as compared to the control. The growth of the galls on the roots would have interfered with the plants’ ability to absorb water and nutrients, resulting in a sharp decline in leaf chlorophyll and carotenoids [26]. The effectiveness of the leaf’s photosynthetic process is closely associated with the reduction in photosynthetic pigments. As a result, all of the five infected cucurbit species showed a noticeably lower rate of photosynthetic activity. Additionally, the rate of photosynthesis is inversely related to the rates of transpiration and stomatal conductance [27]. Furthermore, the nematode infestation would have resulted in the partial closure of a stomata cavity or aperture. As a result, the rate of transpiration in the nematode-infected plants consistently dropped. The formation of galls on the root hindered the uptake of nutrients, minerals and water, subsequently resulting in poor productivity of photosynthate. The biochemicals that initiate host defense are salicylic acid and phenol, and their production is enhanced in response to any stress (biotic or abiotic) [28]. According to the results of the present investigation, pathogen and the gaseous exposures are among the crucial biotic stresses that can trigger the production of phenolic and salicylic acid components.
The rates of photosynthesis, leaf pigments, and plant development of cucurbit species were significantly reduced by exposure to 50 and 75 ppb SO2, but phenolic and salicylic acid content increased significantly. The gas entered plants by diffusion through the stomata [29], and produced sulfite ions which reacted with water molecules [3] (EPA 2021). These ions were slowly oxidized to sulfite and sulfate ions [30]. These ions, especially sulfites, are phytotoxic when found in excess in plants, and cause visible injury in green plants when they are exposed to above 50 ppb SO2 concentrations [7]. Plants exhibit disorders with specific symptoms due to SO2 exposure [31]. Chlorosis and necrosis (browning) or yellowing, which was established on the pumpkin foliage, may be due to the bleaching and/or photo oxidation of leaf pigments [30]. Under glasshouse conditions, 75 ppb SO2 suppressed mustard yield by 9–22% [7].
The cucurbit plants were susceptible to M. incognita infection, and intermittent SO2 exposures further predisposed host plants, resulting in altered host–pathogen interactions [32]. Interactions are additive when their combined effect is the sum of each independently, synergistic when the combined effect is greater than the sum of each independently, and antagonistic when the combined effect is less than the sum of each independently [33]. Most of the effects of nematode infection and gas exposures (especially mixtures) were synergistic [32]. In the present study, an additive interaction between the root-knot nematode and 25 ppb SO2 was recorded. However, the interaction between higher concentrations, especially 75 ppb and the nematode, was mostly synergistic because these concentrations aggravated the infection of M. incognita in all cucurbit species used in the experiment. Similar interactions were observed in a previous study, as well [30,31,32].
The bitter gourd had much fewer galls and egg masses, but when the plants were exposed to 50–75 ppb the severity of the disease in terms of number of galls and egg masses enhanced significantly, representing that the moderately resistant bitter gourd was altered into a host susceptible to M. incognita. The nematode’s juvenile entered the surface, as it is an endoparasite [34]. The present study revealed that, under 50–75 ppb SO2 exposures, the cucurbits’ plant growth may be reduced significantly and, meanwhile, plants can become more vulnerable to M. incognita, increasing the likelihood that the disease would spread widely, as was observed for all cucurbit plants used in the current study.

5. Conclusions

The study has revealed that increased SO2 concentrations on cucurbitaceous plants may have an impact on the host–parasite interaction of the root-knot nematode. Five different cucurbit species were evaluated, and intermittent exposure to SO2 at 50 and 75 ppb decreased plant growth parameters and biomass production up to 18%. The cucurbits’ susceptibility to M. incognita was further increased by SO2 exposures, resulting in an increase in root-knot disease severity and a decrease in plant growth parameters (34% at 75 ppb). Bitter gourd showed considerable resistance to nematodes; however, when the plants were exposed to 50–75 ppb SO2, the severity of the root-knot disease increased significantly (26–29%). A synergistic interaction between the root-knot nematode and 75 ppb SO2 was recorded, which is really concerning because concentrations of 25 ppb or more are relevant to current ambient SO2 concentrations. Environments near coal-fired thermal power plants, busy motorways, oil refineries, and other anthropogenic sources may have higher levels of SO2, even as high as 50 ppb.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R.K.; development of the research facility through grants, M.R.K.; methodology, T.F.R. and M.R.K.; software, T.F.R.; validation, T.F.R. and M.R.K.; data recording, T.F.R.; investigation, T.F.R. and M.R.K.; data analysis, T.F.R.; writing—original draft preparation, T.F.R.; writing—review and editing, M.R.K. and T.F.R.; supervision, M.R.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Financial assistance through the Research Associateship from CSIR-HRDG under the project entitled “Effects on susceptibility of cucurbits to root-knot disease under sulfur dioxide stressed environment” (File No: 09/0112(11683)/2021-EMR-I) was granted to T. F. Rizvi. The simulated exposure facility to carry out the experiment, developed through a major research project entitled “Effect of elevated levels of CO2 on the sensitivity of cucurbits to SO2 and susceptibility to powdery mildew fungus and root-knot nematode” (SR/SO/PS/0027/2009), sanctioned by the Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Govt. of India, to M. R. Khan (D/O Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Aligarh Muslim University) is greatly acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agrawal, M.; Deepak, S.S. Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Two Cultivars of Wheat to Elevated Levels of CO2 and SO2, Singly and in Combination. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 121, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Miller, M.J. Retrofit SO2 and NOx Control Technologies for Coal-Fired Power Plants. Environ. Prog. 1986, 5, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. EPA. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, J.; Li, C.; Ristovski, Z.; Milic, A.; Gu, Y.; Islam, M.S.; Wang, S.; Hao, J.; Zhang, H.; He, C.; et al. A Review of Biomass Burning: Emissions and Impacts on Air Quality, Health and Climate in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 1000–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Nawawi, N.H.; Jaafar, M.N. Assessment of Air Pollution Control Technologies to Reduce SOx Emission from Thermal Oxidizer for Oil and Gas Industry. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Kuching, Malaysia, 15–16 July 2021; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021; Volume 1195, p. 012046. [Google Scholar]
  6. Matić, B.I.; Dejanović, S.M. Scope of Air Quality Monitoring Within the Network of Public Health Institutes in Republic of Serbia. Tehnika 2020, 75, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khan, M.R.; Khan, M.M.; Mohiddin, F.A. Development of Alternaria Leaf Spot of Indian Mustard Caused by Alternaria brassicae Under the Stress of Low Levels of Sulfur Dioxide. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2015, 199, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, H.K.; Khaine, I.; Kwak, M.J.; Jang, J.H.; Lee, T.Y.; Lee, J.K.; Kim, I.R.; Kim, W.I.; Oh, K.S.; Woo, S.Y. The Relationship Between SO2 Exposure and Plant Physiology: A Mini Review. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2017, 58, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Khan, M.R.; Khan, M.M. Plants Response to Diseases in Sulphur Dioxide Stressed Environment. Plant Pathol. J. 2011, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Khan, M.R.; Khan, M.W. Sulphur Dioxide Effects on Plants and Pathogens. In Environmental Hazards, Plant and People; Iqbal, M., Srivastava, P.S., Siddiqi, T.O., Eds.; CBS Publishers and Distributors: Old Delhi, India, 2000; pp. 118–136. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rai, R.; Rajput, M.; Agrawal, M.; Agrawal, S.B. Gaseous Air Pollutants: A Review on Current and Future Trends of Emissions and Impact on Agriculture. J. Sci. Res. 2011, 55, 77–102. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, Z.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, X.; Yang, W.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, H.T.; Xu, L.H. Spermidine Protects Chlorella sp. from Oxidative Damage Caused by SO2 in Flue Gas from Coal-Fired Power Plants. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 15179–15188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. El-Eslamboly, A.A.; El-Wanis, A.; Mona, M.; Amin, A.W. Algal Application as a Biological Control Method of Root-knot Nematode Meloidogyne Incognita on Cucumber Under Protected Culture Conditions and Its Impact on Yield and Fruit Quality. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2019, 29, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Asif, M.; Saleem, S.; Tariq, A.; Usman, M.; Haq, R.A.U. Pollutant Emissions from Brick Kilns and Their Effects on Climate Change and Agriculture. Asean J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khan, M.R.; Rizvi, T.F. Effect of Elevated Levels of CO2 on Powdery Mildew Development in Five Cucurbit Species. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 4986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Eisenback, J.D.; Sasser, J.; Carter, C. Diagnostic Characters Useful in the Identification of the Four Most Common Species of Root-knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.). In An Advance Treatise on Meloidogyne; North Carolina State University Graphics: Raleigh, NC, USA, 1985; Volume 1, pp. 95–112. [Google Scholar]
  17. Seinhorst, J.W. The Quantitative Extraction of Nematodes from Soil. Nematologica 1956, 1, 249–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lichtenthaler, H.K.; Buschmann, C. Chlorophylls and Carotenoids: Measurement and Characterization by UV-Vis Spectroscopy. In Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry (CPFA); Wrolstad, R.E., Acree, T.E., An, H., Decker, E.A., Penner, M.H., Reid, D.S., Schwartz, S.J., Shoemaker, C.F., Sporns, P., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001; pp. F4.3.1–F4.3.8. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ghouse, A.K.M.; Yunus, M.; Chowdhury, K.A. Research Trends in Plant Anatomy; Open Library: Washington, DC, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  20. Torriero, A.A.; Luco, J.M.; Sereno, L.; Raba, J. Voltammetric Determination of Salicylic Acid in Pharmaceuticals Formulations of Acetylsalicylic Acid. Talanta 2004, 62, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Roura, E.; Andrés-Lacueva, C.; Estruch, R.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Total Polyphenol Intake Estimated by a Modified Folin–Ciocalteu Assay of Urine. Clin. Chem. 2006, 52, 749–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2014; Available online: http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 1 February 2023).
  23. De Mendiburu, F. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2014; Available online: http://www.tarwi.lemonila.au/-Femendiburu (accessed on 1 February 2023).
  24. Xie, X.; Ling, J.; Mao, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, M.; Gu, X.; Xie, B. Negative Regulation of Root-knot Nematode Parasitic Behavior by Root-Derived Volatiles of Wild Relatives of Cucumis metuliferus CM3. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhac051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Khan, M.R. Plant Nematodes-Methodology, Morphology, Systematics, Biology and Ecology; Science Publishers: Enfield, NH, USA, 2008; p. 360. ISBN 9781578085330. [Google Scholar]
  26. Khan, M.R. Plant nematodes-Global crop production. In Nematode Diseases of Crops and Their Sustainable Management; Khan, M.R., Quientinella, M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 1–47. [Google Scholar]
  27. Abd-Elgawad, M.M.M. Understanding molecular plant–nematode interactions to develop alternative approaches for nematode control. Plants 2022, 11, 2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. El-Sappah, A.H.; Islam, M.M.; El-Awady, H.H.; Yan, S.; Qi, S.; Liu, J.; Cheng, G.-T.; Liang, Y. Tomato natural resistance genes in controlling the root-knot nematode. Genes 2019, 10, 925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Khan, M.R.; Khan, M.W.; Pasha, M.J. Effects of Sulfur Dioxide on the Development of Powdery Mildew of Cucumber. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1998, 40, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khan, M.R.; Khan, M.W. The Interaction of SO2 and Root-knot Nematode on Tomato. Environ. Pollut. 1993, 81, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khan, M.R.; Khan, M.W. Effects of Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, on the Sensitivity of Tomato to Sulfur Dioxide and Ozone. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1997, 38, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Weber, D.E.; Reinert, R.A.; Barker, K.R. Ozone and sulfur dioxide effects on reproduction and host-parasite relationships of selected plant-parasitic nematodes. Phytopathology 1979, 69, 624–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pratt, G.C.; Kromroy, K.W.; Krupa, S.V. Effects of ozone and sulphur dioxide on injury and foliar concentrations of sulphur and chlorophyll in soybean Glycine max. Environ. Pollut. Ser. A Ecol. Biol. 1983, 32, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jaubert-Possamai, S.; Noureddine, Y.; Favery, B. MicroRNAs, new players in the plant–nematode interaction. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Open-top exposure chambers used to expose plants to SO2 (a); Exposure chamber attached to SO2 cylinder (b); SO2 gas analyzer (c).
Figure 1. Open-top exposure chambers used to expose plants to SO2 (a); Exposure chamber attached to SO2 cylinder (b); SO2 gas analyzer (c).
Toxics 11 00334 g001
Figure 2. Galling on roots of cucurbit species caused by root-knot nematode.
Figure 2. Galling on roots of cucurbit species caused by root-knot nematode.
Toxics 11 00334 g002
Figure 3. Line diagram, showing the effect of SO2 exposure on soil population of root-knot nematode, in five cucurbits.
Figure 3. Line diagram, showing the effect of SO2 exposure on soil population of root-knot nematode, in five cucurbits.
Toxics 11 00334 g003
Figure 4. Effect of SO2 levels on galling of M. incognita in pumpkin. The contrasts located on the right side of the line of no difference represent positive interaction (synergistic). The contrasts situated at the furthest location show highest interaction effect.
Figure 4. Effect of SO2 levels on galling of M. incognita in pumpkin. The contrasts located on the right side of the line of no difference represent positive interaction (synergistic). The contrasts situated at the furthest location show highest interaction effect.
Toxics 11 00334 g004
Figure 5. Gas injury caused by SO2 exposure at (a) 50 ppb and (b) 75 ppb.
Figure 5. Gas injury caused by SO2 exposure at (a) 50 ppb and (b) 75 ppb.
Toxics 11 00334 g005
Figure 6. Gas injury caused by SO2 exposure in inoculated plants at (a) 50 ppb and (b) 75 ppb.
Figure 6. Gas injury caused by SO2 exposure in inoculated plants at (a) 50 ppb and (b) 75 ppb.
Toxics 11 00334 g006
Figure 7. Bar diagram showing the effect of SO2 exposure and root-knot nematode on the plant length of five cucurbits.
Figure 7. Bar diagram showing the effect of SO2 exposure and root-knot nematode on the plant length of five cucurbits.
Toxics 11 00334 g007
Figure 8. Bar diagram showing the effect of SO2 exposure and root-knot nematode on the total phenolic content of leaves of five cucurbits.
Figure 8. Bar diagram showing the effect of SO2 exposure and root-knot nematode on the total phenolic content of leaves of five cucurbits.
Toxics 11 00334 g008
Figure 9. Bar diagram showing the effect of SO2 exposure and root-knot nematode inoculation on the total chlorophyll content of leaves of five cucurbits.
Figure 9. Bar diagram showing the effect of SO2 exposure and root-knot nematode inoculation on the total chlorophyll content of leaves of five cucurbits.
Toxics 11 00334 g009
Figure 10. Bar diagram showing the effect of SO2 exposure and root-knot nematode inoculation on the rate of photosynthesis of five cucurbits.
Figure 10. Bar diagram showing the effect of SO2 exposure and root-knot nematode inoculation on the rate of photosynthesis of five cucurbits.
Toxics 11 00334 g010
Table 1. Effect of intermittent exposures of SO2 (ambient, 25, 50, and 75 ppb) on the number of galls and egg masses caused by root-knot nematode (M. incognita) on the roots of five cucurbits.
Table 1. Effect of intermittent exposures of SO2 (ambient, 25, 50, and 75 ppb) on the number of galls and egg masses caused by root-knot nematode (M. incognita) on the roots of five cucurbits.
CucurbitsBitter GourdBottle GourdSponge GourdCucumberPumpkin
TreatmentsNo. of Galls/
Root
No. of Egg Masses/
Root
No. of Galls/
Root
No. of Egg Masses/
Root
No. of Galls/
Root
No. of Egg Masses/
Root
No. of Galls/
Root
No. of Egg Masses/
Root
No. of Galls/
Root
No. of Egg Masses/
Root
Ambient
(Inoculated)
11.19 c5.15 c171.44 b99.31 b185.33 b106.33 b165.51 b92.11 b199.33 b110.03 b
MI + 2512.87 b5.94 b218.07 a126.12 a235.00 a134.83 a208.87 a116.06 a256.14 a141.06 a
MI + 5014.16 a6.53 a221.50 a128.21 a238.52 a136.74 a211.03 a117.35 a260.72 a143.48 a
MI + 7514.46 a6.66 a224.76 a130.39 a241.30 a138.87 a215.16 a119.47 a263.31 a145.24 a
LSD (p ≤ 0.05)
SO2 Level: Treatment0.720.3310.966.3511.796.7710.936.0712.857.08
Ambient = 3–5 ppb SO2, i.e., air without any addition of SO2, MI = inoculation of plants soil with 2000 J2 of M. incognita plant. Figures in a column followed by different alphabets are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s test.
Table 2. Effect of intermittent exposures of SO2 (ambient, 25, 50, and 75 ppb) and root-knot disease (M. incognita) on plant biomass production in terms of dry weight of the five cucurbits.
Table 2. Effect of intermittent exposures of SO2 (ambient, 25, 50, and 75 ppb) and root-knot disease (M. incognita) on plant biomass production in terms of dry weight of the five cucurbits.
CucurbitsBitter GourdBottle GourdSponge GourdCucumberPumpkin
TreatmentsShootRootShootRootShootRootShootRootShootRoot
Ambient
(Uninoculated)
29.11 a10.06 a31.31 a9.31 c28.33 a9.83 a27.31 a9.09 c31.61 a10.71 ab
2525.68 bc8.85 bc27.24 b8.06 d24.68 b8.55 c23.81 b7.93 d27.12 b9.20 bc
5025.62 bc8.84 bc26.43 b7.87 d24.08 b8.38 c23.38 b7.79 d26.36 b8.92 c
7525.35 bc8.75 c26.02 b7.73 d23.66 b8.22 c22.89 b7.64 d25.89 b8.80 c
Ambient
(Inoculated)
26.20 b9.07 bc26.83 b7.97 d24.19 b8.39 c23.49 b7.84 d26.55 b8.97 c
MI + 2523.81 cd10.13 bc22.14 c10.21 b20.28 c10.03 b20.07 c9.73 bc21.81 c11.24 ab
MI + 5022.07 de10.55 bc21.13 c10.87 ab19.29 c10.71 b18.95 c10.32 ab21.12 c11.66 a
MI + 7520.84 e10.94 ab20.82 c11.23 a19.07 c10.91 ab18.79 c10.97 a20.86 cd11.94 a
LSD (p ≤ 0.05)
Treatment0.590.220.610.060.550.190.530.180.60.2
SO2 Level 0.830.310.860.090.780.270.760.250.850.29
SO2 Level: Treatment1.190.431.210.121.10.381.070.361.20.4
Ambient = 3–5 ppb SO2, i.e., air without any addition of SO2, MI = inoculation of plants soil with 2000 J2 of M. incognita/plant. Figures in a column followed by different alphabets are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s test.
Table 3. Effect of intermittent exposures of SO2 (ambient, 25, 50, and 75 ppb) and root-knot disease on number of trichomes and stomata in five cucurbits.
Table 3. Effect of intermittent exposures of SO2 (ambient, 25, 50, and 75 ppb) and root-knot disease on number of trichomes and stomata in five cucurbits.
CucurbitsBitter GourdBottle GourdSponge GourdCucumberPumpkin
TreatmentsTrichomes (cm−2)Stomata
(cm−2)
Trichomes (cm−2)Stomata
(cm−2)
Trichomes (cm−2)Stomata
(cm−2)
Trichomes (cm−2)Stomata
(cm−2)
Trichomes (cm−2)Stomata
(cm−2)
Ambient (Uninoculated)120.31 a88.11 a129.31 a93.21 a126.11 a84.33 a127.61 a98.33 a121.11 a92.22 a
25112.01 b82.12 b115.34 b83.24 b112.87 b75.64 b115.10 b88.79 b107.79 b81.80 b
50108.28 bc79.39 bc114.31 b82.49 b111.86 b74.80 b113.57 b87.71 b106.70 b81.15 b
75106.11 bcd78.24 bc108.75 b78.48 b106.69 b71.17 b108.47 b83.68 b101.13 b77.19 bc
Ambient
(Inoculated)
108.52 bc79.56 bc115.09 b82.77 b112.36 b75.14 b114.34 b87.91 b107.06 b81.61 b
MI + 25101.30 cde74.19 cd94.40 c68.23 c92.44 c62.07 c94.43 c72.37 c86.47 c66.03 c
MI + 5098.65 de72.16 d90.52 c65.06 c89.92 c59.96 c93.16 c71.19 c83.69 c63.91 c
MI + 7597.21 e71.02 d88.06 c63.38 c86.26 c58.02 c89.33 cd68.54 cd81.51 c61.97 cd
LSD (p ≤ 0.05)
Treatment2.521.862.561.852.51.682.551.972.381.81
SO2 Level 3.582.623.622.613.542.373.612.783.372.56
SO2 Level: Treatment5.063.715.113.695.013.355.113.934.763.63
Ambient = 3–5 ppb SO2, i.e., air without any addition of SO2, MI = inoculation of plants soil with 2000 J2 of M. incognita/plant. Figures in a column followed by different alphabets are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s test.
Table 4. Effect of intermittent exposures of SO2 (ambient, 25, 50 and 75 ppb) and root-knot disease on salicylic acid content and carotenoids in five cucurbits.
Table 4. Effect of intermittent exposures of SO2 (ambient, 25, 50 and 75 ppb) and root-knot disease on salicylic acid content and carotenoids in five cucurbits.
CucurbitsBitter GourdBottle GourdSponge GourdCucumberPumpkin
TreatmentsSalicylic AcidCarotenoidsSalicylic AcidCarotenoidsSalicylic AcidCarotenoidsSalicylic AcidCarotenoidsSalicylic AcidCarotenoids
Ambient (Uninoculated)16.31 c34.51 a18.31 c35.21 a15.11 c41.51 a17.11 c35.12 a18.91 c38.12 a
2517.35 b32.20 b20.10 b31.79 b16.47 b37.61 b18.74 b31.50 b20.82 b33.62 b
5017.86 b30.99 bc20.29 b31.20 b16.64 b36.99 b18.92 b31.05 b20.99 b33.51 b
7518.10 b30.23 bcd21.00 b29.65 b17.23 b35.20 b19.64 b29.71 bc21.75 b32.06 b
Ambient
(Inoculated)
17.66 b31.34 bc20.12 b31.58 b16.52 b37.40 b18.60 b31.47 b20.80 b33.85 b
MI + 2518.81 a29.26 cd23.24 ab25.60 c19.13 a30.30 c21.71 a25.29 c24.24 a27.14 c
MI + 5019.25 a28.30 d23.84 ab24.37 c19.52 a29.47 c22.23 a24.27 c24.77 a25.81 c
MI + 7519.29 a27.99 d24.15 a24.08 c19.73 a29.22 c22.40 a23.99 c25.02 a25.58 c
LSD (p ≤ 0.05)
Treatment0.040.070.50.70.420.830.470.70.520.75
SO2 Level 0.061.020.710.990.591.170.670.980.741.06
SO2 Level: Treatment0.091.451.011.40.831.660.941.390.051.5
Ambient = 3–5 ppb SO2, i.e., air without any addition of SO2, MI = inoculation of plants soil with 2000 J2 of M. incognita plant. Salicylic acid = (ppm), carotenoids = (µg g−1 fresh leaf). Figures in a column followed by different alphabets are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s test.
Table 5. Effect of intermittent exposures of SO2 and root-knot nematode (M. incognita) inoculation on physiological parameters of five cucurbits.
Table 5. Effect of intermittent exposures of SO2 and root-knot nematode (M. incognita) inoculation on physiological parameters of five cucurbits.
CucurbitsBitter GourdBottle GourdSponge GourdCucumberPumpkin
TreatmentsTranspirationStomatal ConductanceTranspirationStomatal ConductanceTranspirationStomatal ConductanceTranspirationStomatal ConductanceTranspirationStomatal Conductance
Ambient (Uninoculated)1.91 d1.63 c2.31 c1.82 c2.81 c2.91 c2.82 c2.11 c2.11 c1.90 c
252.04 cd1.75 bc2.54 b2.00 b3.07 b3.18 b3.09 b2.31 b2.33 b2.10 b
502.09 bc1.78 b2.56 b2.01 b3.10 b3.22 b3.12 b2.33 b2.35 b2.12 b
752.12 abc1.81 ab2.65 b2.09 b3.20 b3.31 b3.24 b2.41 b2.43 b2.19 b
Ambient
(Inoculated)
2.06 bcd1.77 b2.54 b2.00 b3.08 b3.18 b3.06 bc2.30 b2.33 bc2.09 bc
MI + 252.20 ab1.88 ab2.92 a2.29 a3.54 a3.67 a3.58 a2.68 a2.70 a2.43 a
MI + 502.25 a1.93 a3.00 a2.36 a3.60 a3.72 a3.62 a2.71 a2.77 a2.49 a
MI + 752.26 a1.94 a3.00 a2.36 a3.60 a3.73 a3.67 a2.75 a2.79 a2.51 a
LSD (p ≤ 0.05)
Treatment0.050.040.060.050.080.080.080.060.060.05
SO2 Level 0.070.060.090.070.10.110.10.080.080.08
SO2 Level: Treatment0.10.080.130.100.150.160.160.110.120.1
Ambient = 3–5 ppb SO2, i.e., air without any addition of SO2, MI = inoculation of plants soil with 2000 J2 of M. incognita plant. Transpiration = (mmol H2O m−2 s−1), Stomatal Conductance = (mol m−2 s−1). Figures in a column followed by different alphabets are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rizvi, T.F.; Khan, M.R. Biological and Physiological Responses of Root-knot Disease Development on Five Cucurbits Exposed to Different Concentrations of Sulfur Dioxide. Toxics 2023, 11, 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040334

AMA Style

Rizvi TF, Khan MR. Biological and Physiological Responses of Root-knot Disease Development on Five Cucurbits Exposed to Different Concentrations of Sulfur Dioxide. Toxics. 2023; 11(4):334. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040334

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rizvi, Tanveer Fatima, and Mujeebur Rahman Khan. 2023. "Biological and Physiological Responses of Root-knot Disease Development on Five Cucurbits Exposed to Different Concentrations of Sulfur Dioxide" Toxics 11, no. 4: 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040334

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop