Consumers’ Emotion Attitudes towards Organic and Conventional Food: A Comparison Study of Emotional Profiling and Self-Reported Method
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Emotional Profiling
2.1.1. Samples
2.1.2. Procedures
2.2. Cognitive Survey
2.3. Rapid Forced-Choice Test
2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Food-Elicited Emotions vs. Food-Declared Emotions
3.1.1. Organic vs. Conventional Samples
3.1.2. Cognitive Survey vs. Emotional Profiling
3.2. Consumers’ Preferences: Organic vs. Conventional Food
3.3. Organic Food Concept: Cognitive Survey vs. Touch Test
3.4. Intention-Behavior Gap (IBG)
Perceived Impact of IBG on Subjective Well-Being
3.5. Rapid Forced-Choice
4. Discussion
4.1. Food-Declared Emotions vs. Food-Elicited Emotions
4.1.1. Organic versus Conventional
4.1.2. Cognitive Survey versus Emotional Profiling
4.1.3. Organic Food Concept: Cognitive Survey vs. Touch Test
4.2. Intention-Behavior Gap
4.3. Rapid Forced-Choice
4.4. Limitations of the Study
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Appendix B
Sample | Type of Samples | PE | p Value Or-Co | NE | p Value Or-Co | p Value PE-NE | Overall Liking | p Value Or-Co | Dwell Time LC | p Value Or-Co | Dwell Time DC | p Value Or-Co | p Value LC-DC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apple | Or | 2.70 | 0.456 | 1.20 | 0.789 | 0.000 | 3.54 | 0.228 | 3886.80 | 0.324 | 1367.89 | 0.324 | 0.014 |
Co | 2.80 | 1.20 | 0.000 | 3.77 | 4383.20 | 827.66 | 0.000 | ||||||
Orange | Or | 2.75 | 0.590 | 1.42 | 0.203 | 0.000 | 3.79 | 0.795 | 3517.56 | 0.665 | 520.60 | 0.168 | 0.000 |
Co | 2.64 | 1.39 | 0.000 | 3.87 | 3302.96 | 777.00 | 0.000 | ||||||
Walnut | Or | 2.11 | 0.082 | 1.19 | 0.084 | 0.000 | 3.38 | 0.309 | 2032.90 | 0.019 | 2327.04 | 0.004 | 0.548 |
Co | 2.40 | 1.09 | 0.000 | 3.62 | 2853.31 | 1339.43 | 0.025 | ||||||
Oregano | Or | 2.60 | 0.027 | 1.40 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 3.79 | 0.562 | 2825.56 | 0.77 | 1348.09 | 0.55 | 0.001 |
Co | 2.34 | 1.78 | 0.000 | 3.72 | 2824.23 | 1343.61 | 0.03 | ||||||
Red pepper | Or | 1.93 | 0.380 | 1.32 | 0.993 | 0.003 | 2.82 | 0.411 | 3016.57 | 0.460 | 1344.77 | 0.827 | 0.006 |
Co | 1.82 | 1.32 | 0.008 | 2.67 | 2658.45 | 1143.61 | 0.005 | ||||||
Coffee | Or | 2.50 | 0.900 | 1.29 | 0.756 | 0.000 | 3.67 | 0.106 | 2363.26 | 0.301 | 1951.30 | 0.655 | 0.3 |
Co | 2.51 | 1.27 | 0.000 | 3.38 | 1898.78 | 2145.97 | 0.63 | ||||||
Orange juice | Or | 2.33 | 0.018 | 1.34 | 0.029 | 0.000 | 3.8 | 0.000 | 3536.48 | 0.076 | 368.23 | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Co | 1.88 | 1.68 | 0.368 | 2.41 | 2746.32 | 1359.26 | 0.058 | ||||||
Pear | Or | 2.15 | 0.058 | 1.20 | 0.253 | 0.000 | 3.5 | 0.970 | 3486.41 | 0.002 | 609.91 | 0.102 | 0.000 |
Co | 1.93 | 1.30 | 0.002 | 3.6 | 2717.76 | 873.08 | 0.000 | ||||||
Cognitive survey | Or | 3.45 | 0.000 | 1.18 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||||||
Co | 1.96 | 2.18 | 0.406 |
References
- Carrington, M.J.; Neville, B.A.; Whitwell, G.J. Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 97, 139–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beattie, G.; McGuire, L. See no evil? Only implicit attitudes predict unconscious eye movements towards images of climate change. Semiotica 2012, 2012, 315–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aschemann-Witzel, J.; Zielke, S. Can’t Buy Me Green? A Review of Consumer Perceptions of and Behavior Toward the Price of Organic Food. J. Consum. Aff. 2017, 51, 211–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darby, M.R.; Karni, E. Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud. J. Law Econ. 1973, 16, 67–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Millock, K.; Hansen, L.G. Willingness to Pay for Organic Foods: A Comparison between Survey Data and Panel Data from Denmark. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual EAERE (European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists) Conference, Monterey, CA, USA, 24–27 June 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Aertsens, J.; Verbeke, W.; Mondelaers, K.; Van Huylenbroeck, G. Personal determinants of organic food consumption: A review. Br. Food J. 2009, 111, 1140–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Terlau, W.; Hirsch, D. Sustainable Consumption and the Attitude-Behaviour-Gap Phenomenon-Causes and Measurements towards a Sustainable Development. Int. J. Food Syst. Dyn. 2015, 6, 159–174. [Google Scholar]
- Vermeir, I.; Verbeke, W. Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude-behavioral intention” gap. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2006, 19, 169–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashmi, U.; Huong, N.T.; Wee, C.S. Key Factors Affecting Consumer Purchase Intention a Study of Safe Vegetable in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Univ. Econ. Ho Chi Minh City Int. Sch. Bus. 2012, 1, 1–68. [Google Scholar]
- Schleenbecker, R.; Hamm, U. Consumers’ perception of organic product characteristics. A review. Appetite 2013, 71, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aschemann-Witzel, J.; Niebuhr Aagaard, E.M. Elaborating on the attitude-behaviour gap regarding organic products: Young Danish consumers and in-store food choice. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2014, 38, 550–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thøgersen, J.; de Barcellos, M.D.; Perin, M.G.; Zhou, Y. Consumer buying motives and attitudes towards organic food in two emerging markets: China and Brazil. Int. Mark. Rev. 2015, 32, 389–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardello, A.V.; Meiselman, H.L.; Schutz, H.G.; Craig, C.; Given, Z.; Lesher, L.L.; Eicher, S. Measuring emotional responses to foods and food names using questionnaires. Food Qual. Prefer. 2012, 24, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutjar, S.; Dalenberg, J.R.; de Graaf, C.; de Wijk, R.A.; Palascha, A.; Renken, R.J.; Jager, G. What reported food-evoked emotions may add: A model to predict consumer food choice. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 45, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, S.C.; Meiselman, H.L. Development of a method to measure consumer emotions associated with foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 2010, 21, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, M.; Chaya, C.; Hort, J. Beyond liking: Comparing the measurement of emotional response using EsSense Profile and consumer defined check-all-that-apply methodologies. Food Qual. Prefer. 2013, 28, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spinelli, S.; Masi, C.; Dinnella, C.; Zoboli, G.P.; Monteleone, E. How does it make you feel? A new approach to measuring emotions in food product experience. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 37, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomson, D.M.H.; Crocker, C.; Marketo, C.G. Linking sensory characteristics to emotions: An example using dark chocolate. Food Qual. Prefer. 2010, 21, 1117–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schouteten, J.J.; de Steur, H.; de Pelsmaeker, S.; Lagast, S.; de Bourdeaudhuij, I.; Gellynck, X. Impact of health labels on flavor perception and emotional profiling: A consumer study on cheese. Nutrients 2015, 7, 10251–10268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mojet, J.; Dürrschmid, K.; Danner, L.; Jöchl, M.; Heiniö, R.L.; Holthuysen, N.; Köster, E. Are implicit emotion measurements evoked by food unrelated to liking? Food Res. Int. 2015, 76, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desmet, P.M.A.; Schifferstein, H.N.J. Sources of positive and negative emotions in food experience. Appetite 2008, 50, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Bao, J.; Wang, C.; Wu, L. The impact of different emotional appeals on the purchase intention for green products: The moderating effects of green involvement and Confucian cultures. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2017, 34, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antonetti, P.; Maklan, S. Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices. J. Bus. Ethics 2014, 124, 117–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verhoef, P.C. Explaining purchases of organic meat by Dutch consumers. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2005, 32, 245–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dean, M.; Raats, M.M.; Shepherd, R. Moral concerns and consumer choice of fresh and processed organic foods. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2008, 38, 2088–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dalenberg, J.R.; Gutjar, S.; Ter Horst, G.J.; De Graaf, K.; Renken, R.J.; Jager, G. Evoked emotions predict food choice. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, S.C.; Meiselman, H.L.; Carr, B.T. Measuring emotions associated with foods in consumer testing. Food Qual. Prefer. 2010, 21, 1114–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meiselman, H.L. A review of the current state of emotion research in product development. Food Res. Int. 2015, 76, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desmet, P. Development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products. In Funology; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 111–123. [Google Scholar]
- Danner, L.; Sidorkina, L.; Joechl, M.; Duerrschmid, K. Make a face! Implicit and explicit measurement of facial expressions elicited by orange juices using face reading technology. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 32, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Houwer, J.; Moors, A. How to define and examine implicit processes? In Psychology of Science: Implicit and Explicit Processes; Proctor, R., Capaldi, E.J., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012; pp. 183–198. [Google Scholar]
- Ismael, D.; Ploeger, A. Development of a Sensory Method to Detect Food-Elicited Emotions Using Emotion-Color Association and Eye-Tracking. Foods 2019, 8, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Beattie, G.; McGuire, L.; Sale, L. Do we actually look at the carbon footprint of a product in the initial few seconds? An experimental analysis of unconscious eye movements. Int. J. Environ. Cult. Econ. Soc. Sustain. 2010, 6, 47–66. [Google Scholar]
- Beattie, G.; Sale, L. Shopping to Save the Planet? Implicit Rather than Explicit Attitudes Predict Low Carbon Footprint Consumer Choice. Int. J. Environ. Cult. Econ. Soc. Sustain. Annu. Rev. 2011, 7, 211–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenwald, A.G.; Nosek, B.A. Attitudinal Dissociation: What Does it Mean? In Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures; Psychology Press: London, UK, 2008; pp. 85–102. [Google Scholar]
- Dane, E.; Pratt, M.G. Exploring Intuition and Its Role in Managerial Decision Making. Source Acad. Manag. Rev. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Leeuw, E.D.; Hox, J.; Dillman, D. International Handbook of Survey Methodology; Routledge: Abington on the Thames, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Tseng, K.C. Behavioral finance, bounded rationality, neuro-finance, and traditional finance. Invest. Manag. Financ. Innov. 2006, 3, 7–18. [Google Scholar]
- Koola, P.M.; Benjamin, P.; Schatz, S.; Colombo, G. A Methodology for Capturing and Fusing Unconscious Cognition with Computation. Proced. Manuf. 2015, 3, 4129–4135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kühn, S.; Brass, M. Retrospective construction of the judgement of free choice. Conscious. Cognit. 2009, 18, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- UNI EN ISO 8589. Sensory Analysis–General Guidance for the Design of Test Rooms; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Foti, D.; Hajcak, G.; Dien, J. Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: Evidence from temporal-spatial PCA. Psychophysiology 2009, 46, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, C.; Isaacowitz, D.M. Aiming at happiness: How motivation affects attention to and memory for emotional images. Motiv. Emot. 2006, 30, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryła, P. Organic food consumption in Poland: Motives and barriers. Appetite 2016, 105, 737–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gottschalk, I.; Leistner, T. Consumer reactions to the availability of organic food in discount supermarkets. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2013, 37, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geier, U.; Hermann, I.; Mittag, K.; Buchecker, K. First steps in the development of a psychological test on the effects of food on mental well-being. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 2753–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simões-Wüst, A.P.; Moltó-Puigmartí, C.; Jansen, E.H.; van Dongen, M.C.; Dagnelie, P.C.; Thijs, C. Organic food consumption during pregnancy and its association with health-related characteristics: The KOALA Birth Cohort Study. Public Health Nutr. 2017, 20, 2145–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Massey, M.; O’Cass, A.; Otahal, P. A meta-analytic study of the factors driving the purchase of organic food. Appetite 2018, 125, 418–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bourn, D.; Prescott, J. A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities, and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2002, 42, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ellison, B.; Duff, B.R.L.; Wang, Z.; White, T.B. Putting the organic label in context: Examining the interactions between the organic label, product type, and retail outlet. Food Qual. Prefer. 2016, 49, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Montaño, Z.; Smith, J.D.; Dishion, T.J.; Shaw, D.S.; Wilson, M.N. Longitudinal Relations Between Observed Parenting Behaviors and Dietary Quality of Meals from Ages 2 to 5. Appetite 2015, 87, 324–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Spinelli, S.; Masi, C.; Zoboli, G.P.; Prescott, J.; Monteleone, E. Emotional responses to branded and unbranded foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 42, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gmuer, A.; Nuessli Guth, J.; Runte, M.; Siegrist, M. From emotion to language: Application of a systematic, linguistic-based approach to design a food-associated emotion lexicon German. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 40, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dentoni, D.; Tonsor, G.T.; Calantone, R.J.; Peterson, H.C. The Direct and Indirect Effects of ‘Locally Grown’ on Consumers’ Attitudes towards Agri-Food Products. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 2009, 38, 384–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Z.; Schroeder, T.C.; Yu, X. Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Cue Attribute: The Value beyond its Own. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2010, 22, 108–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rousseau, S. The role of organic and fair trade labels when choosing chocolate. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 44, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schouteten, J.J.; De Steur, H.; Sas, B.; De Bourdeaudhuij, I.; Gellynck, X. The effect of the research setting on the emotional and sensory profiling under blind, expected, and informed conditions: A study on premium and private label yogurt products. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 169–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Weber, J.L. Analyzing the Correlation between Overall Likeness and Emotional Responses Before and After the Consumption of Dairy Beverages. Bachelor’s Thesis, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Friese, M.; Basel, M.W.; Plessner, H. Implicit Consumer Preferences and Their Influence on Product Choice. Psychol. Mark. 2017, 23, 727–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Type and Description | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Taste | Unlabeled sample | Apple | Orange juice | Walnut |
Fresh fruit (Royal gala) | Processed juice | Raw, unsalted | ||
Smell | Unlabeled sample | Red bell pepper | Oregano | Ground coffee |
Fresh | Spices | Valve-sealed bags | ||
Visual | Labeled sample | Pear | Orange juice | |
Fresh fruit (Abate Fetel) | 33cl bottle | |||
Touch | Sample | Coins and banknotes | Fresh grass, stones, tree branches, and soil | Apple and cotton wool balls |
Indication | Indicates the price value of organic product | Indicates the environmental friendliness value | Indicates the health value | |
Rapid forced-choice | Labeled sample | A 33cl bottle of Orange juice |
Demographic Characteristics | Category | Percentage/Mean |
---|---|---|
Gender (%) | Female | 65% |
Male | 35% | |
Education (%) | University level | 75% |
High school | 25% | |
Less than high school | 0% | |
Occupation (%) | Student | 75% |
Employee | 20% | |
Neither | 5% | |
Knowledge of organic food concept (%) | Very good knowledge | 15% |
Good knowledge | 58% | |
Moderate knowledge | 23% | |
Poor knowledge | 3% | |
Very poor knowledge | 3% | |
Organic food consumption behavior (%) | All the food purchases are organic | 13% |
Most of the food purchases are organic | 40% | |
Half of the food purchases are organic | 28% | |
Only few of the food purchases are organic | 18% | |
None of the food purchases are organic | 3% | |
Organic food consumption intention (%) | I wish to buy all food purchases as organic | 76% |
I wish to buy most of the food purchases as organic | 10% | |
I wish to buy half of the food purchases as organic | 5% | |
I wish to buy only few of the food purchases as organic | 8% | |
I do not wish to buy any organic food | 3% | |
Started consuming organic food (%) | Recently (<5 years) | 18% |
Since few years (>5 years) | 54% | |
Since I was a child | 28% | |
Motivating factors influencing the organic food consumption behavior (5-point scale) | Protecting the environment | 4.72 |
Animal welfare | 4.33 | |
Taste | 3.90 | |
Health | 3.75 | |
Appearance | 2.77 | |
Rewarding yourself | 2.55 | |
Perceived aspect of organic food products (5-point scale) | Environmentally friendly products | 4.18 |
Healthy products | 3.98 | |
High price products | 3.45 |
Samples | Emotion 1 | Mean | ± SD | Emotion 2 | Mean | ± SD | Emotion 3 | Mean | ± SD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apple | Organic | Happy | 3.23 | 1.37 | Active | 2.90 | 1.31 | Optimistic | 2.85 | 1.39 |
Conventional | Happy | 3.46 | 1.23 | Optimistic | 2.85 | 1.33 | Active | 2.79 | 1.44 | |
Orange juice | Organic | Active | 3.28 | 1.32 | Happy | 3.13 | 1.32 | Optimistic | 2.82 | 1.35 |
Conventional | Happy | 3.51 | 1.39 | Optimistic | 3.08 | 1.35 | Active | 2.90 | 1.35 | |
Walnut | Organic | Happy | 3.59 | 1.50 | Active | 2.21 | 1.30 | Optimistic | 2.26 | 1.37 |
Conventional | Happy | 2.85 | 1.51 | Optimistic | 2.59 | 1.52 | Active marketplace | 2.26 | 1.31 | |
Oregano | Organic | Optimistic | 2.85 | 1.33 | Happy | 2.82 | 1.45 | Active | 2.51 | 1.30 |
Conventional | Happy | 3.13 | 1.49 | Optimistic | 2.97 | 1.42 | Active | 2.87 | 1.36 | |
Red bel pepper | Organic | Active | 2.21 | 1.26 | Happy | 2.18 | 1.27 | Optimistic | 2.15 | 1.31 |
Conventional | Active | 2.10 | 1.12 | Optimistic | 2.00 | 1.08 | Happy | 1.95 | 1.07 | |
Coffee | Organic | Happy | 2.95 | 1.62 | Optimistic | 2.90 | 1.55 | Encouraged | 2.79 | 1.63 |
Conventional | Happy | 3.03 | 1.56 | Optimistic | 2.74 | 1.50 | Active | 2.74 | 1.58 | |
Pear fruit | Organic | Happy | 2.49 | 1.34 | Optimistic | 2.59 | 1.29 | Active | 2.36 | 1.20 |
Conventional | Happy | 2.29 | 1.23 | Optimistic | 2.23 | 1.27 | Active | 2.03 | 1.27 | |
Orange juice bottle | Organic | Happy | 2.95 | 1.52 | Optimistic | 2.59 | 1.31 | Satisfied | 2.51 | 1.20 |
Conventional | Guilty | 2.00 | 1.32 | Sad | 1.97 | 1.27 | Happy | 2.00 | 1.05 | |
Cognitive survey | Organic | Happy | 4.00 | 1.11 | Optimistic | 3.78 | 1.17 | Active | 3.40 | 1.00 |
Conventional | Guilty | 2.60 | 1.31 | Regretful | 2.47 | 1.18 | Happy | 2.75 | 1.10 |
Overall Liking | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive elicited emotions | Sample | Apple | Orange | Walnut | Oregano | Pepper | Coffee | Juice bottle | Pear fruit |
Organic | 0.661 ** | 0.641 ** | 0.619 ** | 0.719 ** | 0.769 ** | 0.696 ** | 0.595 ** | 0.606 ** | |
Conventional | 0.812 ** | 0.438 ** | 0.682 ** | 0.658 ** | 0.623** | 0.707 ** | 0.581 ** | 0.448 ** |
Detect Real PEA towards Organic | Detect Real NEA towards Organic | Detect Real PEA towards Conventional | Detect Real NEA towards Conventional | Predict the Final Choice of Organic | Predict the Final Choice of Conventional | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cognitive survey | + | + | − | − | − − (*) | ++ (*) |
Emotional profiling (Informed condition) | + | + | − − | − | ||
Emotional profiling (Uninformed condition) | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ismael, D.; Ploeger, A. Consumers’ Emotion Attitudes towards Organic and Conventional Food: A Comparison Study of Emotional Profiling and Self-Reported Method. Foods 2020, 9, 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9010079
Ismael D, Ploeger A. Consumers’ Emotion Attitudes towards Organic and Conventional Food: A Comparison Study of Emotional Profiling and Self-Reported Method. Foods. 2020; 9(1):79. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9010079
Chicago/Turabian StyleIsmael, Diana, and Angelika Ploeger. 2020. "Consumers’ Emotion Attitudes towards Organic and Conventional Food: A Comparison Study of Emotional Profiling and Self-Reported Method" Foods 9, no. 1: 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9010079